Superomedial pedicle technique of reduction mammaplasty

A series of 148 patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty utilizing the superomedial pedicle technique is presented. Resections as large as 4100 gm per breast with nipple-areola transpositions up to 30 cm were done with reliable nipple-areola survival, including preservation of sensation. The superior pedicle technique of breast reduction is recognized by many as technically easier and capable of producing a longer-lasting aesthetic effect. Classically, however, it has been limited to smaller resections. By incorporating the medial quadrant in the superior pedicle, more aggressive reductions can be safely undertaken with the same excellent results. Details of the procedure, the anatomic basis for its success, and complications are discussed.     

Medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty for severe mammary hypertrophy

Current options in reduction mammaplasty for severe mammary hypertrophy include amputation with free-nipple graft as well as the inferior pedicle and bipedicle techniques. Complications of these procedures include nipple-areola necrosis, insensitivity, and hypopigmentation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty can minimize these complications. Twenty-three patients with severe mammary hypertrophy were studied. The medial pedicle successfully transposed the nipple-areola complex in 44 of 45 breasts (98 percent). Mean change in nipple position was 17.1 cm, and mean weight of tissue removed was 1604 g per breast. Nipple-areola sensation was retained in 43 of 44 breasts (98 percent) using a medial pedicle. Hypopigmentation was not observed, and central breast projection was restored in all patients. This study has demonstrated that medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty is a safe and reliable technique and should be given primary consideration in cases of severe mammary hypertrophy.     

Breast-feeding after inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty

The breast-feeding practices of a series of postpartum women, who had undergone prior reduction mammaplasty by means of an inferior pedicle approach, are reported in this retrospective study. Also identified are the factors that influenced the decision to breast-feed postoperatively. From a patient pool of 544 individuals who elected to have reduction mammaplasty between 1984 and 1994 (age range, 15 to 35 years), 334 could be contacted and interviewed by means of telephone by using a standardized questionnaire. Successful breast-feeding was defined as the ability to feed for a duration equal to or greater than 2 weeks. Seventy-eight patients had children after their breast reduction surgery. Fifteen of the 78 patients (19.2 percent) breast-fed exclusively, 8 (10.3 percent) breast-fed with formula supplementation, 14 (17.9 percent) had an unsuccessful breast-feeding attempt, and 41 (52.6 percent) did not attempt breast-feeding. Of the 41 patients not attempting to breast-feed, 9 patients did so as a direct consequence of discouragement by a health care professional. Further reasons for feeding with supplementation, having an unsuccessful attempt, and not attempting to breast-feed are presented. Of the 78 women who had children postoperatively, a total of 27 were discouraged from breast-feeding by medical professionals with only 8 of the 27 (29.6 percent) subsequently attempting, despite this recommendation. In comparison, 26 patients were encouraged to breast-feed; nineteen (73.1 percent) of them did subsequently attempt breast-feeding. This rate is statistically significant by using a chi2 test with 1 df(p = 0.0016). Postpartum breast engorgement and lactation was experienced by 31 of the 41 patients not attempting to breast-feed. Of these 31 patients, 19 believed that they would have been able to breast-feed due to the extent of breast engorgement and lactation experienced. Given the use of an inferior flap mammaplasty technique and patient encouragement, the possibility for breast-feeding after reduction mammaplasty exists. This prevalence falls near the breast-feeding rate found in the population not having undergone breast surgery, according to an article in the Canadian Journal of Public Health.     

Importance of the pedicle length measurement in reduction mammaplasty

Various measurements are still considered to be important for making decisions regarding the approach in reduction mammaplasty, even though the vast majority of techniques used are based on an inferior pedicle. This study was performed to analyze the variability of the suprasternal notch-to-nipple and nipple-to-inframammary fold distance measurements when using the inferior pedicle technique. In 92 patients, 184 breasts having various volumes were measured preoperatively, and the variability of the measurements of the suprasternal notch-to-nipple and nipple-to-inframammary fold distance was analyzed. The values of the distance from the suprasternal notch to nipple were dispersed over a wide range with a trimodal distribution, with peaks at the intervals of 23 to 27 cm, 28 to 33 cm, and 34 to 45 cm. In contrast, the values of the nipple-to-inframammary fold distance showed a normal distribution pattern, with the peak at 14 cm. The distance from the suprasternal notch to nipple has a fair relationship to the inframammary fold-to-nipple distance, the latter being concentrated in a smaller range (r = 0.51). The former is often used to decide whether a free-nipple graft should be performed. However, the relative consistency of the latter measurement has led to the conclusion that the free-nipple graft technique need never be considered.     

Reliability of inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty in burned oversized breasts

Heavy pendulous breasts cause physical and psychological trauma. Postburn deformity of breasts results in significant asymmetry, displacement of nipple-areola complex, due to burn scar contracture, and significant scarring; these factors add more psychological discomfort and subsequent behavioral changes. The use of the inferior pedicle procedure in burned breasts can solve many problems. The technique reduces the size of the large breast, eliminates the scar tissue by excising both medial and lateral flaps, and brings the mal-located nipple and areola to a normal position. This study stresses the possibility of harvesting the inferior dermal pedicle flap from within the postburn scar tissue without necrosis of the nipple and areola, because of the excellent flap circulation. Acceptable aesthetic appearance and retainment of nipple viability and sensitivity can be achieved with the inferior pedicle technique even with postburn deformity of the breast. The study was conducted on 11 women, all of whom had sustained deep thermal burns to the breasts and anterior torso and whose breasts were hypertrophied and pendulous.     

"De-epithelization" of the dermal pedicle in a reduction mammaplasty.

Eleven biopsies in 6 consecutive patients having reduction mammaplasties by a technique which uses a dermal pedicle have established that dermis does remain in the pedicle. The term "de-epithelization" is not correct and should be abandoned in this context.     

Short scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction (SPAIR) mammaplasty

A method of breast reduction is presented that maintains the blood supply and innervation to the nipple and areola complex by means of an inferior pedicle, reduces the breast volume by removing tissue from the periphery of the breast, maintains breast shape with internal plication sutures, and limits the scar using a periareolar technique with a short inferior vertical-to-oblique extension. There were 167 breasts in 98 patients reduced in this fashion. The average resection volume was 632 g per breast, with an average follow-up of 7.6 months. The complication rate was similar to that observed using traditional inferior pedicle techniques with the inverted-T cutaneous scar. This technique has proven to be versatile, technically straightforward, and applicable to breasts of all sizes for both breast reduction and mastopexy. By combining the aesthetic advantage of less cutaneous scarring with the safety and familiarity of the inferiorly based pedicle, superior results in breast reduction can be obtained that are consistent, long-lasting, and satisfying for both patient and surgeon alike.     

A comparison of complication rates in large and small inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty

The main objective of this retrospective study was to determine whether the rates of complications are higher in large reductions (> or =1000 g per breast) as compared with smaller reductions (< or =999 g per breast) using the inferior pedicle technique. A retrospective chart review of 133 consecutive patients operated on between October of 2000 and March of 2002 was undertaken. Complication data were recorded and analyzed on a per-breast basis. Two hundred sixteen breasts had reductions of 999 g or less, whereas 50 breasts had reductions of 1000 g or more. The overall mean follow-up period was 152 days (range, 20 to 522 days). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of nipple necrosis, hematoma formation, seroma, delayed healing, culture-positive wound infection, fat necrosis, cyst formation, nipple sensation, or hypertrophic scarring between the large and small reductions. However, the rate of wound dehiscence was significantly lower in the smaller reduction group. The rates of wound dehiscence and hypertrophic scarring were also significantly lower in patients who had received at least 5 days of postoperative antibiotics. A statistically significant difference was also reported for clinical wound infection (p < 0.0005). Body mass index had no statistically significant effect on the rate of nipple necrosis, hematoma formation, fat necrosis, cyst formation, nipple sensation, or hypertrophic scarring. However, body mass index had a statistically significant effect on delayed healing, wound dehiscence, and culture-positive wound infection. A higher mean body mass index predicted a delayed healing, wound dehiscence, and infection. The inferior pedicle technique is a safe method of breast reduction regardless of degree of parenchymal resection. However, the use of postoperative antibiotics for at least 5 days is recommended to reduce rates of wound dehiscence and improve postoperative scarring.     

Preservation of projection after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up of the inferior pedicle technique

In reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique, the dermal-breast pedicle can be manipulated to form a central breast mound and enhance breast projection. When this technique is applied both to macromastia and breast asymmetry, excellent early results are reported. To study the effects of time on breast reduction, 22 patients were followed for an average of 4.7 years. Contour of the breast mound and projection are well preserved. However, evaluation of long-term results reveals a gradual increase in the inframammary fold to inferior areola distance. Since no increase in the midclavicle to nipple distance is observed, inferior migration of the breast parenchyma and superior displacement of the nipple-areola with respect to the breast mound occur after reduction mammaplasty with the inferior pedicle technique.