Infection with an insect virus affects olfactory behaviour and interactions with host plant and natural enemies in an aphid

Aphid ecology and population dynamics are affected by a series of factors including behavioural responses to ecologically relevant chemical cues, capacity for population growth, and interactions with host plants and natural enemies. Using the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Homoptera: Aphididae), we showed that these factors were affected by infection with Rhopalosiphum padi virus (RhPV). Uninfected aphids were attracted to odour of uninfected aphids on the host plant, an aggregation mechanism. However, infected aphids were not attracted, and neither infected nor uninfected aphids were attracted to infected aphids on the plant. Infected aphids did not respond to methyl salicylate, a cue denoting host suitability. Infected aphids were more behaviourally sensitive to aphid alarm pheromone, and left the host plant more readily in response to it. RhPV reduced the lifespan and population growth rate of the aphid. The predacious ladybird, Coccinella septempunctata (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), consumed more infected aphids than uninfected aphids in a 24‐h period, and the aphid parasitoid Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) attacked more infected than uninfected aphids. However, the proportion of mummies formed was lower with infected aphids. The results represent further evidence that associated organisms can affect the behaviour and ecology of their aphid hosts.     

Aphid behavioral responses to virus‐infected plants are similar despite divergent fitness effects

We compared the settling preferences and reproductive potential of an oligophagous herbivore, the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris (Hemiptera: Aphididae), in response to pea plants, Pisum sativum L. cv. ‘Aragorn’ (Fabaceae), infected with two persistently transmitted viruses, Pea enation mosaic virus (PEMV) and Bean leaf roll virus (BLRV), that differ in their distribution within an infected plant. Aphids preferentially oriented toward and settled on plants infected with PEMV or BLRV in comparison with sham‐inoculated plants (plants exposed to herbivory by uninfected aphids), but aphids did not discriminate between plants infected with the two viruses. Analysis of plant volatiles indicated that plants inoculated with either virus had significantly higher green leaf volatile‐to‐monoterpene ratios. Time until reproductive maturity was marginally influenced by plant infection status, with a trend toward earlier nymph production on infected plants. There were consistent age‐specific effects of plant infection status on aphid fecundity: reproduction was significantly enhanced for aphids on BLRV‐infected plants across most time intervals, though mean aphid fecundity did not differ between sham and PEMV‐infected plants. There was no clear pattern of age‐specific survivorship; however, mean aphid lifespan was reduced on plants infected with PEMV. Our results are consistent with predictions of the host manipulation hypothesis, extended to include plant viruses: non‐viruliferous A. pisum preferentially orient to virus‐infected host plants, potentially facilitating pathogen transmission. These studies extend the scope of the host manipulation hypothesis by demonstrating that divergent fitness effects on vectors arise relative to the mode of virus transmission.     

Cucurbit aphid‐borne yellows virus (CABYV) modifies the alighting,settling and probing behaviour of its vector Aphis gossypii favouring its own spread

Plant pathogens are able to influence the behaviour and fitness of their vectors in such a way that changes in plant–pathogen–vector interactions can affect their transmission. Such influence can be direct or indirect, depending on whether it is mediated by the presence of the pathogen in the vector's body or by host changes as a consequence of pathogen infection. We report the effect that the persistently aphid‐transmitted Cucurbit aphid‐borne yellows virus (CABYV, Polerovirus) can induce on the alighting, settling and probing behaviour activities of its vector, the cotton aphid Aphis gossypii. Only minor direct changes on aphid feeding behaviour were observed when viruliferous aphids fed on non‐infected plants. However, the feeding behaviour of non‐viruliferous aphids was very different on CABYV‐infected than on non‐infected plants. Non‐viruliferous aphids spent longer time feeding from the phloem in CABYV‐infected plants compared to non‐infected plants, suggesting that CABYV indirectly manipulates aphid feeding behaviour through its shared host plant in order to favour viral acquisition. Viruliferous aphids showed a clear preference for non‐infected over CABYV‐infected plants at short and long time, while such behaviour was not observed for non‐viruliferous aphids. Overall, our results indicate that CABYV induces changes in its host plant that modifies aphid feeding behaviour in a way that virus acquisition from infected plants is enhanced. Once the aphids become viruliferous they prefer to settle on healthy plants, leading to optimise the transmission and spread of this phloem‐limited virus.     

Suppressing spread of alfalfa mosaic virus in grazed legume pasture swards using insecticides and admixture with grass, and effects of insecticides on numbers of aphids and three other pasture pests

Field experiments were sown with alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV)‐infected or healthy seed of burr medic (Medicago polymorpha) and grazed by sheep. Seed‐infected plants acted as primary sources for virus spread by naturally occurring aphids. Admixture with annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum), a non‐host of AMV, and different insecticides were used in attempts to suppress virus spread. Sowing swards to provide the ratios 1 : 4 and 1 : 13 of medic:ryegrass plants diminished AMV spread in medic plants by 23% and 45% respectively. Applications of organophosphorus (demeton‐s‐methyl), carbamate (pirimicarb) and newer generation synthetic pyrethroid (alpha‐cypermethrin) insecticides, all significantly decreased final AMV incidence. Alpha‐cypermethrin was the most effective, suppressing AMV incidence by 87% (two sprays), 79% (one late spray) and 65% (one early spray). Two sprays of demeton‐s‐methyl decreased incidence by only 36%, while two and 2 weekly applications of pirimicarb diminished it by 29–65% and 35–70% respectively. AMV infection of medic seed harvested decreased by up to 76% in sprayed plots. Insecticide treatment did not prevent winged aphids from landing but numbers of wingless Acyrthosiphon kondoi colonising swards were suppressed by up to 92% by spraying with pirimicarb and up to 96% by alpha‐cypermethrin. A. kondoi were much slower to recover with alpha‐cypermethrin than with pirimicarb, the former still significantly diminishing its numbers 35 days after spraying. Alpha‐cypermethrin was also very effective at suppressing Halotydeus destructor and Penthaleus major but not Sminthurus viridis. Greater effectiveness of insecticides in controlling spread of AMV in pasture than has been found previously with non‐persistently aphid‐transmitted viruses in annual crops seems due to the key role played by wingless aphids as virus vectors.     

Infection of potato plants with potato leafroll virus changes attraction and feeding behaviour of Myzus persicae

Potato leafroll virus (PLRV; genus Polerovirus, family Luteoviridae) is a persistently transmitted circulative virus that depends on aphids for spreading. The primary vector of PLRV is the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Solanum tuberosum L. potato cv. Kardal (Solanaceae) has a certain degree of resistance to M. persicae: young leaves seem to be resistant, whereas senescent leaves are susceptible. In this study, we investigated whether PLRV‐infection of potato plants affected aphid behaviour. We found that M. persicae's ability to differentiate headspace volatiles emitted from PLRV‐infected and non‐infected potato plants depends on the age of the leaf. In young apical leaves, no difference in aphid attraction was found between PLRV‐infected and non‐infected leaves. In fact, hardly any aphids were attracted. On the contrary, in mature leaves, headspace volatiles from virus infected leaves attracted the aphids. We also studied the effect of PLRV‐infection on probing and feeding behaviour (plant penetration) of M. persicae using the electrical penetration graph technique (DC system). Several differences were observed between plant penetration in PLRV‐infected and non‐infected plants, but only after infected plants showed visual symptoms of PLRV infection. The effects of PLRV‐infection in plants on the behaviour of M. persicae, the vector of the virus, and the implications of these effects on the transmission of the virus are thoroughly discussed.     

Deploying strain specific hypersensitive resistance to diminish temporal virus spread

Spread of necrotic and non‐necrotic strains of Bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV) was compared when aphid vectors moved both types from external or internal virus sources to plots of Lupinus spp. (lupin). Regardless of whether virus sources were internal or external, removed or left in place, and spread was within plots with homologous sources or across buffers to plots containing the opposite type of virus source, non‐necrotic BYMV always spread faster than necrotic BYMV in plots of L. angustifolius (narrow‐leafed lupin). When necrotic BYMV spread from external sources into plots sown with two L. angustifolius genotypes differing in their necrosis responses to different BYMV strain groups and one genotype of L. luteus (yellow lupin) giving only non‐necrotic responses, differing symptom reactions in the two L. angustifolius genotypes revealed presence of two distinct necrotic BYMV strain groups and overall virus spread was greater in this species than in L. luteus. Spread of non‐necrotic BYMV in L. angustifolius was always polycyclic in nature. However, when it came initially from external sources, spread of necrotic BYMV was largely monocyclic. This work demonstrates how temporal virus spread can be diminished when hypersensitive (necrotic) resistance is deployed and the limitations associated with employing hypersensitivity that is strain specific.     

Further studies on cucumber mosaic virus infection of narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius): seed-borne infection, aphid transmission, spread and effects on grain yield

Four field trials were done with narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius) in 1988 - 1989, to examine the effect of sowing seed with 5% and 0.5% cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) infection on subsequent virus spread, grain yield and percentage of infection in harvested seed. A proportion of the CM V-infected seed failed to produce established plants and thus, plots sown with 5% and 0.5% infected seed contained 1.5-2.9% and 0.2-0.3% of seed-infected plants respectively. The rate of virus spread by aphids was faster and resulted in more extensive infection at maturity in plots sown with 5% infected seed than with 0.5% infected seed. In three trials, sowing 5% infected seed resulted in yield losses of 34 - 53% and CMV infection in the seed harvested of 6 - 13%. The spread of CMV infection resulting from sowing 0.5% infected seed did not significantly decrease yield. However, late CMV spread in these plots caused > 1% seed infection. In the fourth trial, which was badly affected by drought, CMV spread only slowly, there was no significant effect of CMV on grain yield and the percentage of infected seed harvested was 3–5 times less than that in the seed sown. When CMV-infected seed was sown at different depths, target depths of 8 and 11 cm decreased the incidence of seed-infected plants by c. 15% and c. 50% respectively compared with sowing at 5 cm. However, in glasshouse tests, treatment with the pre-emergence herbicide simazine failed to selectively cull out seed-infected plants. The field trials were colonised by green peach (Myzus persicae), blue-green (Acyrthosiphon kondoi) and cowpea (Aphis craccivora) aphids. When the abilities of these aphid species and of the turnip aphid (Lipaphis erysimi) in transmitting CMV from lupins to lupins were examined in glasshouse tests, short acquisition access times favoured transmission. With 5–10 min acquisition access times, overall transmission efficiencies were 10.8%, 9.4%, 6.1% and 3.9% for the green peach, cowpea, blue-green and turnip aphids respectively.     

Effects of cereal borders, admixture with cereals and plant density on the spread of bean yellow mosaic potyvirus into narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius)

In studies of virus control measures, field experiments in 1987–1991 investigated the effects of cereal and fallow borders, admixture with cereals and plant density on spread of bean yellow mosaic potyvirus (BYMV) from pastures dominated by subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum) into plots of narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius). Virus spread was mainly monocyclic because BYMV killed infected lupin plants and between systemic movement and death there was only a brief period for BYMV acquisition and transmission to other plants by vector aphids. In plots with cereal borders, the rate and extent of BYMV spread into the lupins was decreased; at final assessment the numbers of infected plants were 43–60% less than in plots with fallow borders. Admixture with cereals also decreased the rate and extent of BYMV spread into lupin plots, numbers of infected plants being decreased by 76–96% at the time of final assessment. When lupins were sown at different seeding rates to generate a range of plant densities and weeds were removed, high densities decreased BYMV infection. The higher incidences of BYMV infection in sparse stands were attributed partly to smaller plant numbers and partly to incoming viruliferous vector aphids being more attracted to plants with bare earth around them, than to a plant canopy. BYMV infection decreased grain yield of samples from infected lupin plants by 94–100%. In plots with 34% infection and sparse stands, grain yield was decreased by about one third. Plotted progress curves for the accumulated numbers of alate aphids of the BYMV vector species Acyrthosiphon kondoi and Myzus persicae resembled those for numbers of BYMV infected plants in 1990, but in 1991 only the curve plotted for M. persicae did so. There was a 2 week delay between the curves for aphid numbers and virus counts which reflected the time taken for obvious systemic necrotic symptoms to develop in lupins.     

Bottom–up regulates top–down: the effects of hybridization of grass endophytes on an aphid herbivore and its generalist predator

The ecological consequences of hybridization of microbial symbionts are largely unknown. We tested the hypothesis that hybridization of microbial symbionts of plants can negatively affect performance of herbivores and their natural enemies. In addition, we studied the effects of hybridization of these symbionts on feeding preference of herbivores and their natural enemies. We used Arizona fescue as the host‐plant, Neotyphodium endophytes as symbionts, the bird cherry–oat aphid as the herbivore and the pink spotted ladybird beetle as the predator in controlled experiments. Neither endophyte infection (infected or not infected) nor hybrid status (hybrid and non‐hybrid infection) affected aphid reproduction, proportion of winged forms in the aphid populations, aphid host‐plant preference or body mass of the ladybirds. However, development of ladybird larvae was delayed when fed with aphids grown on hybrid (H+) endophyte infected grasses compared to larvae fed with aphids from non‐hybrid (NH+) infected grasses, non‐hybrid, endophyte‐removed grasses (NH?) and hybrid, endophyte‐removed (H?) grasses. Furthermore, adult beetles were more likely to choose all other types of grasses harboring aphids rather than H+ infected grasses. In addition, development of ladybirds was delayed when fed with aphids from naturally uninfected (E?) grasses compared to ladybirds that were fed with aphids from NH+ and NH? grasses. Our results suggest that hybridization of microbial symbionts may negatively affect generalist predators such as the pink spotted ladybird and protect herbivores like the bird cherry–oat aphids from predation even though the direct effects on herbivores are not evident.     

Parasitoids aid dispersal of a nonpersistently transmitted plant virus by disturbing the aphid vector

• 1 Aphids are the major group of insects that vector plant viruses, and they often display a preference for foliage showing disease symptoms. Although this behaviour will increase the numbers of vectors acquiring the pathogen, it will not in itself result in a greater spread of the disease.
• 2 The present study examined how infection of Vicia faba by the nonpersistently transmitted virus bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV) affected colonization by pea aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum. We then examined how foraging by the hymenopterous parasitoid Aphidius ervi affected aphid settling/movement behaviour and the consequences for dissemination of the virus.
• 3 In Petri dish arenas, aphids colonized discs from BYMV‐infected leaves more rapidly than discs from uninfected plants. Reflectance from infected foliage was approximately 20% higher than from uninfected leaves in the green–yellow wavelengths, indicating that aphids might be responding to visual cues from the brighter foliage. Settling was reduced by A. ervi, with the foraging wasps preventing the aphids reaching and/or remaining on the leaf tissue.
• 4 In multiple plant arenas, A. ervi caused a reduction in aphid numbers but also a nine‐fold increase in BYMV infection. It is hypothesized that disturbance by the parasitoids resulted in more aphid movement as well as more cases of aphids probing on a BYMV‐infected plant and then a new host within the critical time period for successful inoculation to occur. This effect of parasitoids on virus dispersal should be considered in epidemiological models of insect‐vectored plant diseases, and also when evaluating the use of natural enemies in biocontrol strategies of insect herbivore/vector pests.

     

Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) response to Barley yellow dwarf virus at various nitrogen application rates in the presence and absence of its aphid vector,Rhopalosiphum padi

Barley yellow dwarf (BYD) is one of the most common diseases of cereal crops, caused by the phloem‐limited, cereal aphid‐borne Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) (Luteoviridae). Delayed planting and controlling aphid vector numbers with insecticides have been the primary approaches to manage BYD. There is limited research on nitrogen (N) application effects on plant growth, N status, and water use in the BYDV pathosystem in the absence of aphid control. Such information will be essential in developing a post‐infection management plan for BYDV‐infected cereals. Through a greenhouse study, we assessed whether manipulation of N supply to BYDV‐infected winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L. (Poaceae), in the presence or absence of the aphid vector Rhopalosiphum padi L. (Hemiptera: Aphididae), could improve N and/or water uptake, and subsequently promote plant growth. Similar responses of shoot biomass and of water and N use efficiencies to various N application rates were observed in both BYDV‐infected and non‐infected plants, suggesting that winter wheat plants with only BYDV infection may be capable of outgrowing infection by the virus. Plants, which simultaneously hosted aphids and BYDV, suffered more severe symptoms and possessed higher virus loads than those infected with BYDV only. Moreover, in plants hosting both BYDV and aphids, aphid pressure was positively associated with N concentration within plant tissue, suggesting that N application and N concentration within foliar tissue may alter BYDV replication indirectly through their influence on aphid reproduction. Even though shoot biomass, tissue N concentration, and water use efficiency increased in response to increased N application, decision‐making on N fertilization to plants hosting both BYDV and aphids should take into consideration the potential of aphid outbreak and/or the possibility of reduced plant resilience to environmental stresses due to decreased root growth.     

Aphids decelerate litter nitrogen mineralisation through changes in litter quality

相似文献   

The influence of primary infection date and establishment of vector populations on the spread of yellowing viruses in sugar beet

In three field experiments in 1985 and 1986, we studied the effect of the date of primary infection on the spread of beet yellows closterovirus (BYV) and beet mild yellowing luteovirus (BMW) from artificially inoculated sugar beet plants. Laboratory-reared vector aphids, Myzus persicae, were placed on these sources of virus. There was no substantial natural immigration of vectors or viruses. In two experiments, one with BMYV in 1985 and the other in BYV in 1986, populations of vector aphids remained low and there was little virus spread, i.e. c. 50 infected plants from one primarily infected source. The cause of this small amount of spread was the low number of vector aphids. In the third experiment, with BYV in 1986, large populations of M. persicae developed and there was substantial virus spread: c. 2000 infected plants in the plots which were inoculated before canopy closure. In later-inoculated plots in the same experiment, there was much less spread: c. 100 infected plants per virus source plant. Differences between fields in predator impact are implicated as the most probable factor causing differences in vector establishment and virus spread between these three experiments. Virus spread decreased with later inoculation in all three experiments. A mathematical model of virus spread incorporating results from our work has been used to calculate how the initial proportion of infected plants in a crop affects the final virus incidence. This model takes into account the effect of predation on the development of the aphid populations. The processes underlying the spread and its timing are discussed.     

Raspberry viruses affect the behavior and performance of Amphorophora agathonica in single and mixed infections

Pathogens may alter their hosts, which consequently increases transmission efficiency by vectors. We examined the effects of Raspberry leaf mottle virus [RLMV; Closterovirus (Closteroviridae)] and Raspberry latent virus [RpLV; Reovirus (Reoviridae)], alone and in a co‐infection in raspberry, Rubus idaeus L. (Rosaceae) cv. Meeker, on the behavior and performance of its vector, Amphorophora agathonica Hottes (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Longevity was increased in aphids feeding on all infected‐plant treatments compared with healthy plants, but aphid fecundity only increased in the co‐infection treatment. In a two‐way choice study between infected and healthy plants, aphids showed no difference in preference between plants after 30 min of exposure. After 24 h, aphids significantly preferred to settle on plants infected with RLMV over healthy, but healthy plants over plants infected with RpLV. There were no differences in settling preferences between healthy and co‐infected plants. An electrical penetration graph study showed no differences in aphid feeding behavior on plants infected with RLMV and RLMV+RpLV when compared with healthy controls. Our results are consistent with past findings that infected plant's impact vector performance and behavior, but also highlight the need to further investigate greater virus diversity and effects of mixed infections.     

Aphids secrete watery saliva into plant tissues from the onset of stylet penetration

Aphid feeding requires the secretion of two types of saliva: gelling saliva (from the principal gland) that forms an intercellular sheath for the penetrating stylet, and watery saliva [from accessory salivary glands (ASGs)] that facilitates intracellular penetration and phloem feeding. Plant viruses can be used as salivary markers to investigate key steps in aphid feeding, and penetration can be monitored electrically using the electrical penetration graph (EPG) approach. We conducted a series of EPG‐controlled transmission experiments using Cucurbit aphid‐borne yellows virus [CABYV; Polerovirus spec. (Luteoviridae)], which is retained in the ASGs, as a marker for watery saliva secretions. The melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae), was used as a vector and melon seedlings, Cucumis melo L. (Cucurbitaceae), as host plants. Viruliferous aphids were interrupted at various stages during stylet penetration, i.e., during intercellular penetration prior to intracellular puncture and following a potential drop within the first probe. Viruliferous aphids and leaf disc samples obtained from the stylet penetration site were used to detect CABYV by quantitative real‐time RT‐PCR. Approximately half of the inoculated leaf discs were found to be infected with CABYV after very brief (12.9 ± 1.9 s) intercellular stylet probes and before intracellular stylet puncture. The number of virus particles ejected during such probes was similar to the number ejected by aphids during longer probes including a single intracellular puncture. Our results therefore suggest that watery saliva is secreted by aphids from the onset of stylet penetration.     

Comparison of the potential rate of population increase of brown and green color morphs of Sitobion avenae (Homoptera: Aphididae) on barley infected and uninfected with Barley yellow dwarf virus

Life tables of brown and green color morphs of the English grain aphid, Sitobion avenae (Fabricius) reared on barley under laboratory conditions at 20 ± 1°C, 65% ± 5% relative humidity and a photoperiod of 16 : 8 h (L : D) were compared. The plants were either: (i) infected with the Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV); (ii) not infected with virus but previously infested with aphids; or (iii) healthy barley plants, which were not previously infested with aphids. Generally, both color morphs of S. avenae performed significantly better when fed on BYDV‐infected plants than on plants that were virus free but had either not been or had been previously infested with aphids. Furthermore, when fed on BYDV‐infected plants, green S. avenae developed significantly faster and had a significantly shorter reproductive period than the brown color morph. There were no significant differences in this respect between the two color morphs of S. avenae when they were reared on virus‐free plants that either had been or not been previously infested with aphids. These results indicate that barley infected with BYDV is a more favorable host plant than uninfected barley for both the color morphs of S. avenae tested, particularly the green color morph.     

Effect of mineral oil on Potato virus Y acquisition by Rhopalosiphum padi

Seed potato crops are currently sprayed weekly with mineral oil to prevent transmission of the Potato virus Y (PVY; Potyviridae: Potyvirus), one of the most prevalent and important non‐persistent viruses affecting potato production. In spite of its wide usage as inhibitor of virus transmission, the mode of action for mineral oil is poorly known. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of dosage and time from application of mineral oil on the inhibition of PVY acquisition. The bird cherry‐oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), known as vector of PVY, was used in all the experiments. The results indicated that mineral oil efficiently decreased PVY acquisition by 75 and 70% 1 day after application of 5 and 10 l ha^?1, respectively. The inhibition effect decreased with time from application; mineral oil inhibits acquisition for less than 4 days at 5 l ha^?1 and between 8 and 12 days at 10 l ha^?1. As mineral oil was detected in the body of fewer aphids when they fed on plants 1 day after oil application, a change in the aphid probing behaviour on mineral oil‐treated plants was deduced. These results support the hypothesis that mineral oil physically inhibits the binding of the virus at the tip of the stylets.     

Biological properties of necrotic and non-necrotic strains of bean yellow mosaic virus in cool season grain legumes

A collection of 51 bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV) isolates was transmitted from infected Trifolium subterraneum (subterranean clover) to Lupinus angustifolius (narrow‐leafed lupin) by Myzus persicae (green peach aphid). Depending on isolate and L. angiistifolius genotype used, two distinct responses developed in L. angustifolius plants, either systemic necrosis and plant death or non‐necrotic reactions of varying severity. Ten isolates caused necrosis and plant death in cv. Danja. However, when nine of these were inoculated to breeding line 90L423‐07‐13, seven induced non‐necrotic reactions, while two caused necrosis and plant death. Thirty seven isolates always produced non‐necrotic reactions regardless of genotype of L. angustifolius inoculated. Non‐necrotic and necrotic isolates originally came both from lupins and other species, and the non‐necrotic isolates were no less efficiently transmitted by M. persicae than the necrotic ones. When one isolate of each type was inoculated together to T. subterraneum and nine months later this culture was used as an acquisition source for aphid transmission to L. angustifolius, only the necrotic type was detected. Previous infection of L. angustifolius plants with a non necrolic isolate prevented subsequent infection by a necrotic one. All necrotic and non‐necrotic isolates reacted with BYMV antiserum in ELISA but only two cross‐reacted with antiserum to clover yellow vein virus (CYVV). When selected necrotic and non‐necrotic isolates were inoculated to differential hosts, all behaved like BYMV and not CYVV. When three isolates of each type were transmitted to 11 other cool season grain legume species, except in Cicer arietinum (chickpea), there were no necrotic reactions, but symptom severity varied with the isolate and species inoculated. The two isolates that caused necrosis in C. arietinum did not do so in L. angustifolius. The six isolates from Vicia faba (faba bean) all caused non‐necrotic reactions in L. angustifolius cv. Danja and 90L423‐07‐13. These and two necrotic isolates readily infected five genotypes of V. faba always causing severe symptoms. However, three non‐necrotic isolates from L. angustifolius and a further necrotic isolate were poorly infectious on V. faba in which they generally induced mild symptoms. These results show that at least three strain groups of BYMV can be distinguished by their reactions in different L. angustifolius genotypes, one causing necrosis and death in cv. Danja and 90L423‐07‐13, one causing necrosis and death in Danja but not 90L423‐07‐13, and one causing non‐nccrotic reactions in both. These strain groups could not be distinguished when representative necrotic and non‐necrotic isolates were inoculated to other grain legume species. However, inoculation to V. faba distinguished two other BYMV strain groupings differing in severity of symptoms and ability to infect this species.     

Blockage of stylet tips as the mechanism of resistance to virus transmission by Aphis gossypii in melon lines bearing the Vat gene

Aphis gossypii is the main virus vector in muskmelon crops. The melon gene Vat confers resistance to non‐persistent virus transmission by this aphid. The mechanism of this resistance is not well understood, but no relationship has been detected between resistance and the probing behaviour of aphids on resistant plants. Results presented here suggest that temporary blockage of aphid stylet tips preventing virus particle release may explain the resistance conferred by Vat gene. We performed experiments in which viruliferous aphids were allowed to probe different sequences of resistant (Vat‐bearing) and/or susceptible melon plants. The results demonstrated that A. gossypii inoculates Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) efficiently in susceptible plants having previously probed resistant plants, showing that the resistance mechanism is reversible. Furthermore, the infection rate obtained for susceptible plants was the same (25%) regardless of whether the transmitting aphid had come directly from the CMV source or had subsequently probed on resistant plants. This result suggests that virus is not lost from stylet to plant during probing of resistant plants, supporting the temporary blockage hypothesis. We also found that the ability of Myzus persicae to transmit CMV is noticeably reduced after probing on resistant plants, providing evidence that this aphid species also responds to the presence of the Vat gene. Finally, we also found that in probes immediately after virus acquisition M. persicae inoculates resistant plants with CMV more efficiently than susceptible plants, perhaps because the Vat gene product induces increased salivation by this aphid.     

Elevated CO2 shifts the focus of tobacco plant defences from cucumber mosaic virus to the green peach aphid

Elevation in CO₂ concentration broadly impacts plant physiological characteristics, which influences herbivores and biotrophic pathogens, which in turn regulate the plant defensive response. In this study, responses of tobacco plants to stress in the form of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer), or cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), or both aphid and CMV combined were investigated in open‐top chambers under ambient and elevated CO₂ concentrations. We measured aboveground biomass and foliar chlorophyll, nitrogen, non‐structural carbohydrates, soluble protein, total amino acid and nicotine content in tobacco plants and also measured aphid population dynamics, body weight, honeydew production and anti‐oxidative enzyme activities in individual aphids. Plants produced more secondary metabolites for defence in both CO₂ treatments when treated with aphid and CMV combined than with either alone. Aphid density significantly increased on CMV‐infected tobacco plants (relative to uninfected plants) under ambient CO₂ but not under elevated CO₂. This suggests that plant defences against virus and aphid would be more efficient under elevated CO₂. Plant defence appears to shift from plant virus to aphid under increasing CO₂ levels, which highlights the potential influences of multiple biotic stressors on plants under elevated CO₂.