Transfer RNA determinants for translational editing by Escherichia coli valyl-tRNA synthetase

Valyl-tRNA synthetase (ValRS) has difficulty differentiating valine from structurally similar non-cognate amino acids, most prominently threonine. To minimize errors in aminoacylation and translation the enzyme catalyzes a proofreading (editing) reaction that is dependent on the presence of cognate tRNA^Val. Editing occurs at a site functionally distinct from the aminoacylation site of ValRS and previous results have shown that the 3′-terminus of tRNA^Val is recognized differently at the two sites. Here, we extend these studies by comparing the contribution of aminoacylation identity determinants to productive recognition of tRNA^Val at the aminoacylation and editing sites, and by probing tRNA^Val for editing determinants that are distinct from those required for aminoacylation. Mutational analysis of Escherichia coli tRNA^Val and identity switch experiments with non-cognate tRNAs reveal a direct relationship between the ability of a tRNA to be aminoacylated and its ability to stimulate the editing activity of ValRS. This suggests that at least a majority of editing by the enzyme entails prior charging of tRNA and that misacylated tRNA is a transient intermediate in the editing reaction.     

The tRNA A76 Hydroxyl Groups Control Partitioning of the tRNA-dependent Pre- and Post-transfer Editing Pathways in Class I tRNA Synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze ATP-dependent covalent coupling of cognate amino acids and tRNAs for ribosomal protein synthesis. Escherichia coli isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (IleRS) exploits both the tRNA-dependent pre- and post-transfer editing pathways to minimize errors in translation. However, the molecular mechanisms by which tRNA^Ile organizes the synthetic site to enhance pre-transfer editing, an idiosyncratic feature of IleRS, remains elusive. Here we show that tRNA^Ile affects both the synthetic and editing reactions localized within the IleRS synthetic site. In a complex with cognate tRNA, IleRS exhibits a 10-fold faster aminoacyl-AMP hydrolysis and a 10-fold drop in amino acid affinity relative to the free enzyme. Remarkably, the specificity against non-cognate valine was not improved by the presence of tRNA in either of these processes. Instead, amino acid specificity is determined by the protein component per se, whereas the tRNA promotes catalytic performance of the synthetic site, bringing about less error-prone and kinetically optimized isoleucyl-tRNA^Ile synthesis under cellular conditions. Finally, the extent to which tRNA^Ile modulates activation and pre-transfer editing is independent of the intactness of its 3′-end. This finding decouples aminoacylation and pre-transfer editing within the IleRS synthetic site and further demonstrates that the A76 hydroxyl groups participate in post-transfer editing only. The data are consistent with a model whereby the 3′-end of the tRNA remains free to sample different positions within the IleRS·tRNA complex, whereas the fine-tuning of the synthetic site is attained via conformational rearrangement of the enzyme through the interactions with the remaining parts of the tRNA body.     

Kinetic Origin of Substrate Specificity in Post-Transfer Editing by Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase

The intrinsic editing capacities of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases ensure a high-fidelity translation of the amino acids that possess effective non-cognate aminoacylation surrogates. The dominant error-correction pathway comprises deacylation of misaminoacylated tRNA within the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase editing site. To assess the origin of specificity of Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) against the cognate aminoacylation product in editing, we followed binding and catalysis independently using cognate leucyl- and non-cognate norvalyl-tRNA^Leu and their non-hydrolyzable analogues. We found that the amino acid part (leucine versus norvaline) of (mis)aminoacyl-tRNAs can contribute approximately 10-fold to ground-state discrimination at the editing site. In sharp contrast, the rate of deacylation of leucyl- and norvalyl-tRNA^Leu differed by about 10⁴-fold. We further established the critical role for the A76 3′-OH group of the tRNA^Leu in post-transfer editing, which supports the substrate-assisted deacylation mechanism. Interestingly, the abrogation of the LeuRS specificity determinant threonine 252 did not improve the affinity of the editing site for the cognate leucine as expected, but instead substantially enhanced the rate of leucyl-tRNA^Leu hydrolysis. In line with that, molecular dynamics simulations revealed that the wild-type enzyme, but not the T252A mutant, enforced leucine to adopt the side-chain conformation that promotes the steric exclusion of a putative catalytic water. Our data demonstrated that the LeuRS editing site exhibits amino acid specificity of kinetic origin, arguing against the anticipated prominent role of steric exclusion in the rejection of leucine. This feature distinguishes editing from the synthetic site, which relies on ground-state discrimination in amino acid selection.     

Transiently misacylated tRNA is a primer for editing of misactivated adenylates by class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

The genetic code depends on amino acid fine structure discrimination by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. For isoleucyl- (IleRS) and valyl-tRNA synthetases (ValRS), reactions that hydrolyze misactivated noncognate amino acids help to achieve high accuracy in aminoacylation. Two editing pathways contribute to aminoacylation fidelity: pretransfer and post-transfer. In pretransfer editing, the misactivated amino acid is hydrolyzed as an aminoacyl adenylate, while in post-transfer editing a misacylated tRNA is deacylated. Both reactions are dependent on a tRNA cofactor and require translocation to a site located approximately 30 A from the site of amino acid activation. Using a series of 3'-end modified tRNAs that are deficient in either aminoacylation, deacylation, or both, total editing (the sum of pre- and post-transfer editing) was shown to require both aminoacylation and deacylation activities. These and additional results with IleRS are consistent with a post-transfer deacylation event initiating formation of an editing-active enzyme/tRNA complex. In this state, the primed complex processively edits misactivated valyl-adenylate via the pretransfer route. Thus, misacylated tRNA is an obligatory intermediate for editing by either pathway.     

An aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase with a defunct editing site

Many aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) contain two active sites, a synthetic site catalyzing aminoacyl-adenylate formation and tRNA aminoacylation and a second editing or proofreading site that hydrolyzes misactivated adenylates or mischarged tRNAs. The combined activities of these two sites lead to rigorous accuracy in tRNA aminoacylation, and both activities are essential to LeuRS and other aaRSs. Here, we describe studies of the human mitochondrial (hs mt) LeuRS indicating that the two active sites of this enzyme have undergone functional changes that impact how accurate aminoacylation is achieved. The sequence of the hs mt LeuRS closely resembles a bacterial LeuRS overall but displays significant variability in regions of the editing site. Studies comparing Escherichia coli and hs mt LeuRS reveal that the proofreading activity of the mt enzyme is disrupted by these sequence changes, as significant levels of Ile-tRNA(Leu) are formed in the presence of high concentrations of the noncognate amino acid. Experiments monitoring deacylation of Ile-tRNA(Leu) and misactivated adenylate turnover revealed that the editing active site is not operational. However, hs mt LeuRS has weaker binding affinities for both cognate and noncognate amino acids relative to the E. coli enzyme and an elevated discrimination ratio. Therefore, the enzyme achieves fidelity using a more specific synthetic active site that is not prone to errors under physiological conditions. This enhanced specificity must compensate for the presence of a defunct editing site and ensures translational accuracy.     

Relationship of the CCA sequence of tRNA with the early evolutional aspect of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.

The CCA sequence is common to the 3'-ends of all tRNAs. We investigated the requirement of the CCA sequence in aminoacylation with the cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) and several interesting conclusions could be drawn. In tRNAs belonging to the class I aaRSs, decreased aminoacylation activities resulted from the substitution of A76 with a pyrimidine, whereas in tRNAs belonging to the class II aaRSs, decreased aminoacylation activities resulted from the substitution with guanine. The results suggest that aminoacylation of proto-tRNA might have started through the direct hydrophobic (or stacking) interaction between the large, hydrophobic amino acid residue (now utilizing a class I aaRS) of aminoacyl-AMP and the 3'-terminal adenine. The shorter distance between the adenine and the 2'-OH position than the 3'-OH position, and the bulkiness and hydrophobicity of amino acids may be important reasons why class I aaRSs select the 2'-OH position in aminoacylation. Molecular mechanics-based conformation modeling also indicated that the resulting positioning of the adenine and the amino acid residue of 2'-aminoacyl-adenosine for large amino acid is in the vicinity. In contrast, in the case of small amino acids (with class II aaRSs) which would not be able to use the hydrophobic interaction, a protein enzyme might have participated in the aminoacylation reaction from an early stage. The active-site folds of aaRSs belonging to each class reflect the history of evolution: typical nucleotide-binding fold (Rossman fold) in the case of class I aaRSs, and primitive fold which is found also among the family of nonribosomal peptide synthetases in the case of class II aaRSs.     

Selection of tRNA charging quality control mechanisms that increase mistranslation of the genetic code

Mistranslation can follow two events during protein synthesis: production of non-cognate amino acid:transfer RNA (tRNA) pairs by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) and inaccurate selection of aminoacyl-tRNAs by the ribosome. Many aaRSs actively edit non-cognate amino acids, but editing mechanisms are not evolutionarily conserved, and their physiological significance remains unclear. To address the connection between aaRSs and mistranslation, the evolutionary divergence of tyrosine editing by phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS) was used as a model. Certain PheRSs are naturally error prone, most notably a Mycoplasma example that displayed a low level of specificity consistent with elevated mistranslation of the proteome. Mycoplasma PheRS was found to lack canonical editing activity, relying instead on discrimination against the non-cognate amino acid by kinetic proofreading. This mechanism of discrimination is inadequate for organisms where translation is more accurate, as Mycoplasma PheRS failed to support Escherichia coli growth. However, minor changes in the defunct editing domain of the Mycoplasma enzyme were sufficient to restore E. coli growth, indicating that translational accuracy is an evolutionarily selectable trait.     

Structural modelling of the complex of leucyl-tRNA synthetase and mis-aminoacylated tRNA

To assure fidelity of translation, class Ia aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) edit mis-aminoacylated tRNAs. Mis-attached amino acids and structural water molecules are not included simultaneously in the current crystal structures of the aaRS•tRNA complexes, where the 3′-ends (adenine 76; A76) are bound to the editing sites. A structural model of the completely solvated leucyl-tRNA synthetase complexed with valyl-tRNA^Leu was constructed by exploiting molecular dynamics simulations modified for the present modelling. The results showed that the ribose conformation of A76 is distinct from those observed in the above-mentioned crystal structures, which could be derived from structural constraints in a sandwiched manner induced by the mis-attached valine and tRNA^Leu.     

Modular pathways for editing non-cognate amino acids by human cytoplasmic leucyl-tRNA synthetase

To prevent potential errors in protein synthesis, some aminoacyl-transfer RNA (tRNA) synthetases have evolved editing mechanisms to hydrolyze misactivated amino acids (pre-transfer editing) or misacylated tRNAs (post-transfer editing). Class Ia leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) may misactivate various natural and non-protein amino acids and then mischarge tRNA^Leu. It is known that the fidelity of prokaryotic LeuRS depends on multiple editing pathways to clear the incorrect intermediates and products in the every step of aminoacylation reaction. Here, we obtained human cytoplasmic LeuRS (hcLeuRS) and tRNA^Leu (hctRNA^Leu) with high activity from Escherichia coli overproducing strains to study the synthetic and editing properties of the enzyme. We revealed that hcLeuRS could adjust its editing strategy against different non-cognate amino acids. HcLeuRS edits norvaline predominantly by post-transfer editing; however, it uses mainly pre-transfer editing to edit α-amino butyrate, although both amino acids can be charged to tRNA^Leu. Post-transfer editing as a final checkpoint of the reaction was very important to prevent mis-incorporation in vitro. These results provide insight into the modular editing pathways created to prevent genetic code ambiguity by evolution.     

Pre-transfer editing by class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase: role of aminoacylation active site in "selective release" of noncognate amino acids

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of cognate amino acids to specific tRNA molecules. To prevent potential errors in protein synthesis caused by misactivation of noncognate amino acids, some synthetases have evolved editing mechanisms to hydrolyze misactivated amino acids (pre-transfer editing) or misacylated tRNAs (post-transfer editing). In the case of post-transfer editing, synthetases employ a separate editing domain that is distinct from the site of amino acid activation, and the mechanism is believed to involve shuttling of the flexible CCA-3' end of the tRNA from the synthetic active site to the site of hydrolysis. The mechanism of pre-transfer editing is less well understood, and in most cases, the exact site of pre-transfer editing has not been conclusively identified. Here, we probe the pre-transfer editing activity of class II prolyl-tRNA synthetases from five species representing all three kingdoms of life. To locate the site of pre-transfer editing, truncation mutants were constructed by deleting the insertion domain characteristic of bacterial prolyl-tRNA synthetase species, which is the site of post-transfer editing, or the N- or C-terminal extension domains of eukaryotic and archaeal enzymes. In addition, the pre-transfer editing mechanism of Escherichia coli prolyl-tRNA synthetase was probed in detail. These studies show that a separate editing domain is not required for pre-transfer editing by prolyl-tRNA synthetase. The aminoacylation active site plays a significant role in preserving the fidelity of translation by acting as a filter that selectively releases non-cognate adenylates into solution, while protecting the cognate adenylate from hydrolysis.     

Aminoacylation and translational quality control strategy employed by leucyl-tRNA synthetase from a human pathogen with genetic code ambiguity

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases should ensure high accuracy in tRNA aminoacylation. However, the absence of significant structural differences between amino acids always poses a direct challenge for some aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, such as leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS), which require editing function to remove mis-activated amino acids. In the cytoplasm of the human pathogen Candida albicans, the CUG codon is translated as both Ser and Leu by a uniquely evolved CatRNA^Ser(CAG). Its cytoplasmic LeuRS (CaLeuRS) is a crucial component for CUG codon ambiguity and harbors only one CUG codon at position 919. Comparison of the activity of CaLeuRS-Ser⁹¹⁹ and CaLeuRS-Leu⁹¹⁹ revealed yeast LeuRSs have a relaxed tRNA recognition capacity. We also studied the mis-activation and editing of non-cognate amino acids by CaLeuRS. Interestingly, we found that CaLeuRS is naturally deficient in tRNA-dependent pre-transfer editing for non-cognate norvaline while displaying a weak tRNA-dependent pre-transfer editing capacity for non-cognate α-amino butyric acid. We also demonstrated that post-transfer editing of CaLeuRS is not tRNA^Leu species-specific. In addition, other eukaryotic but not archaeal or bacterial LeuRSs were found to recognize CatRNA^Ser(CAG). Overall, we systematically studied the aminoacylation and editing properties of CaLeuRS and established a characteristic LeuRS model with naturally deficient tRNA-dependent pre-transfer editing, which increases LeuRS types with unique editing patterns.     

Development of tRNA synthetases and connection to genetic code and disease

The genetic code is established by the aminoacylation reactions of aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, where amino acids are matched with triplet anticodons imbedded in the cognate tRNAs. The code established in this way is so robust that it gave birth to the entire tree of life. The tRNA synthetases are organized into two classes, based on their active site architectures. The details of this organization, and other considerations, suggest how the synthetases evolved by gene duplications, and how early proteins may have been statistical in nature, that is, products of a primitive code where one of several similar amino acids was used at a specific position in a polypeptide. The emergence of polypeptides with unique, defined sequences--true chemical entities--required extraordinary specificity of the aminoacylation reaction. This high specificity was achieved by editing activities that clear errors of aminoacylation and thereby prevent mistranslation. Defects in editing activities can be lethal and lead to pathologies in mammalian cells in culture. Even a mild defect in editing is casually associated with neurological disease in the mouse. Defects in editing are also mutagenic in an aging organism and suggest how mistranslation can lead to mutations that are fixed in the genome. Thus, clearance of mischarged tRNAs by the editing activities of tRNA synthetases was essential for development of the tree of life and has a role in the etiology of diseases that is just now being understood.     

The Yin and Yang of tRNA: proper binding of acceptor end determines the catalytic balance of editing and aminoacylation

Faithful translation of the genetic code depends on accurate coupling of amino acids with cognate transfer RNAs (tRNAs) catalyzed by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. The fidelity of leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) depends mainly on proofreading at the pre- and post-transfer levels. During the catalytic cycle, the tRNA CCA-tail shuttles between the synthetic and editing domains to accomplish the aminoacylation and editing reactions. Previously, we showed that the Y330D mutation of Escherichia coli LeuRS, which blocks the entry of the tRNA CCA-tail into the connective polypeptide 1domain, abolishes both tRNA-dependent pre- and post-transfer editing. In this study, we identified the counterpart substitutions, which constrain the tRNA acceptor stem binding within the synthetic active site. These mutations negatively impact the tRNA charging activity while retaining the capacity to activate the amino acid. Interestingly, the mutated LeuRSs exhibit increased global editing activity in the presence of a non-cognate amino acid. We used a reaction mimicking post-transfer editing to show that these mutations decrease post-transfer editing owing to reduced tRNA aminoacylation activity. This implied that the increased editing activity originates from tRNA-dependent pre-transfer editing. These results, together with our previous work, provide a comprehensive assessment of how intra-molecular translocation of the tRNA CCA-tail balances the aminoacylation and editing activities of LeuRS.     

Transfer RNA modulates the editing mechanism used by class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. To prevent errors in protein synthesis, many synthetases have evolved editing pathways by which misactivated amino acids (pre-transfer editing) and misacylated tRNAs (post-transfer editing) are hydrolyzed. Previous studies have shown that class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) possesses both pre- and post-transfer editing functions against noncognate alanine. To assess the relative contributions of pre- and post-transfer editing, presented herein are kinetic studies of an Escherichia coli ProRS mutant in which post-transfer editing is selectively inactivated, effectively isolating the pre-transfer editing pathway. When post-transfer editing is abolished, substantial levels of alanine mischarging are observed under saturating amino acid conditions, indicating that pre-transfer editing alone cannot prevent the formation of Ala-tRNA Pro. Steady-state kinetic parameters for aminoacylation measured under these conditions reveal that the preference for proline over alanine is 2000-fold, which is well within the regime where editing is required. Simultaneous measurement of AMP and Ala-tRNA Pro formation in the presence of tRNA Pro suggested that misactivated alanine is efficiently transferred to tRNA to form the mischarged product. In the absence of tRNA, enzyme-catalyzed Ala-AMP hydrolysis is the dominant form of editing, with "selective release" of noncognate adenylate from the active site constituting a minor pathway. Studies with human and Methanococcus jannaschii ProRS, which lack a post-transfer editing domain, suggest that enzymatic pre-transfer editing occurs within the aminoacylation active site. Taken together, the results reported herein illustrate how both pre- and post-transfer editing pathways work in concert to ensure accurate aminoacylation by ProRS.     

tRNA-dependent Pre-transfer Editing by Prokaryotic Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase

To prevent genetic code ambiguity due to misincorporation of amino acids into proteins, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have evolved editing activities to eliminate intermediate or final non-cognate products. In this work we studied the different editing pathways of class Ia leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS). Different mutations and experimental conditions were used to decipher the editing mechanism, including the recently developed compound AN2690 that targets the post-transfer editing site of LeuRS. The study emphasizes the crucial importance of tRNA for the pre- and post-transfer editing catalysis. Both reactions have comparable efficiencies in prokaryotic Aquifex aeolicus and Escherichia coli LeuRSs, although the E. coli enzyme favors post-transfer editing, whereas the A. aeolicus enzyme favors pre-transfer editing. Our results also indicate that the entry of the CCA-acceptor end of tRNA in the editing domain is strictly required for tRNA-dependent pre-transfer editing. Surprisingly, this editing reaction was resistant to AN2690, which inactivates the enzyme by forming a covalent adduct with tRNA^Leu in the post-transfer editing site. Taken together, these data suggest that the binding of tRNA in the post-transfer editing conformation confers to the enzyme the capacity for pre-transfer editing catalysis, regardless of its capacity to catalyze post-transfer editing.     

Enzymatic tRNA acylation by acid and alpha-hydroxy acid analogues of amino acids

Incorporation of unnatural amino acids with unique chemical functionalities has proven to be a valuable tool for expansion of the functional repertoire and properties of proteins as well as for structure-function analysis. Incorporation of alpha-hydroxy acids (primary amino group is substituted with hydroxyl) leads to the synthesis of proteins with peptide bonds being substituted by ester bonds. Practical application of this modification is limited by the necessity to prepare corresponding acylated tRNA by chemical synthesis. We investigated the possibility of enzymatic incorporation of alpha-hydroxy acid and acid analogues (lacking amino group) of amino acids into tRNA using aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs). We studied direct acylation of tRNAs by alpha-hydroxy acid and acid analogues of amino acids and corresponding chemically synthesized analogues of aminoacyl-adenylates. Using adenylate analogues we were able to enzymatically acylate tRNA with amino acid analogues which were otherwise completely inactive in direct aminoacylation reaction, thus bypassing the natural mechanisms ensuring the selectivity of tRNA aminoacylation. Our results are the first demonstration that the use of synthetic aminoacyl-adenylates as substrates in tRNA aminoacylation reaction may provide a way for incorporation of unnatural amino acids into tRNA, and consequently into proteins.     

The balance between pre- and post-transfer editing in tRNA synthetases

The fidelity of tRNA aminoacylation is dependent in part on amino acid editing mechanisms. A hydrolytic activity that clears mischarged tRNAs typically resides in an active site on the tRNA synthetase that is distinct from its synthetic aminoacylation active site. A second pre-transfer editing pathway that hydrolyzes the tRNA synthetase aminoacyl adenylate intermediate can also be activated. Pre- and post-transfer editing activities can co-exist within a single tRNA synthetase resulting in a redundancy of fidelity mechanisms. However, in most cases one pathway appears to dominate, but when compromised, the secondary pathway can be activated to suppress tRNA synthetase infidelities.     

A glycine hinge for tRNA-dependent translocation of editing substrates to prevent errors by leucyl-tRNA synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases often rely on a proofreading mechanism to clear mischarging errors before they can be incorporated into newly synthesized proteins. Leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) houses a hydrolytic editing pocket in a domain that is distinct from its aminoacylation domain. Mischarged amino acids are transiently translocated ∼30 Å between active sites for editing by an unknown tRNA-dependent mechanism. A glycine within a flexible β-strand that links the aminoacylation and editing domains of LeuRS was determined to be important to tRNA translocation. The translocation-defective mutation also demonstrated that the editing site screens both correctly and incorrectly charged tRNAs prior to product release.