Purification and particle properties of groundnut rosette assistor virus and production of a specific antiserum*

Purified preparations of the luteovirus, groundnut rosette assistor virus (GRAV), were made by treatment of groundnut leaf extracts with cellulase, followed by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Yields of virus particles were about 0·5-1·0 mg/kg leaf material. The preparations contained isometric particles c. 28 nm in diameter with a sedimentation coefficient (s_{20, w}) of 115 S, a buoyant density in Cs₂SO₄ of 1·34 g/cm³, and A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ of 1·86. The particles contained a single species of nucleic acid (presumably RNA), of mol. wt 2·09 × 10⁶and with no detectable polyadenylate sequence, and a single protein species, of mol. wt 24 × 10³. An antiserum produced in a rabbit had a titre of 1/256 in gel diffusion tests and detected GRAV in leaf extracts by ELISA. GRAV particles reacted in F(ab')₂-ELISA and immunosorbent electron microscopy (ISEM) tests with antisera to bean leaf roll, potato leafroll and tobacco necrotic dwarf luteoviruses, but did not react with antisera to carrot red leaf luteovirus.     

Viruses associated with chlorotic rosette and green rosette diseases of groundnut in Nigeria*

Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) plants from Nigeria with chlorotic rosette disease contained a manually transmissible virus, considered to be a strain of groundnut rosette virus (GRV(C)). GRV(C) infected nine out of 32 species in three out of nine families. It caused local lesions without systemic infection in Chenopodium amaranticolor, C. murale and C. quinoa, and systemic symptoms in Glycine max, Nicotiana benthamiana, N. clevelandii and Phaseolus vulgaris as well as in groundnut. Some ‘rosette-resistant’ groundnut lines were also infected. GRV(C) was transmitted by Aphis craccivora, but only from groundnut plants that were also infected with an aphid-transmissible second virus, which was not manually transmissible and was considered to be groundnut rosette assistor virus (GRAV). Plants infected with GRAV contained isometric particles c. 25 nm in diameter which were detectable by immunosorbent electron microscopy on grids coated with antisera to several luteoviruses, especially with antisera to bean leaf roll, potato leafroll and beet western yellows viruses. No virus-like particles were observed in extracts from plants infected with GRV(C) alone. A single groundnut plant obtained from Nigeria with symptoms of green rosette contained luteovirus particles, presumed to be of GRAV, and yielded a manually transmissible virus that induced symptoms similar to those of GRV(C) in C. amaranticolor but gave only mild or symptomless infection of N. benthamiana and N. clevelandii. It was considered to be a strain of GRV and designated GRV(G).     

The Effect of Groundnut rosette assistor virus on the Agronomic Performance of Four Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotypes

The effect of Groundnut rosette assistor virus (GRAV), in the absence of the other two agents (Groundnut rosette virus and its satellite RNA) of the groundnut rosette disease virus complex, was evaluated on the agronomic performance of four groundnut (=peanut) genotypes (CG‐7, ICGV‐SM‐90704, JL‐24 and ICG‐12991) with different botanical characteristics. All genotypes infected with GRAV showed mild yellowing/chlorosis of leaves and the symptoms persisted throughout their growth period. ELISA absorbance values indicated lower amounts of GRAV antigen in ICGV‐SM‐90704 than in the other genotypes. The reduction in leaf area due to GRAV infection varied between 15.5% and 21.7%, whereas the plant height was decreased between 11.3% and 13.4% among the four genotypes. GRAV infection caused 28.4%, 16.9%, 21.7% and 25.5% reduction in the dry weight of haulms in CG‐7, ICGV‐SM‐90704, JL‐24 and ICG‐12991 respectively. Plants infected with GRAV showed greater reduction in seed weight in CG‐7 (52.2%), followed by JL‐24 (46.1%), ICG‐12991 (40.7%) and ICGV‐SM‐90704 (25.7%). These results provide evidence for the first time that GRAV infection, without GRV and sat RNA, affect plant growth and contribute to yield losses in groundnut.     

Properties and partial purification of infective material from plants containing groundnut rosette virus*

Groundnut plants with chlorotic rosette disease contain a manually transmissible virus, groundnut rosette (GRV), which is also transmitted in the persistent (circulative) manner by aphids (Aphis craccivora), but only from plants that are co-infected with a manually non-transmissible luteovirus, groundnut rosette assistor virus (GRAV). Strains of GRV from plants with chlorotic or green forms of rosette are called GRV(C) and GRV(G) respectively. An isolate of GRV(C) from Nigeria remained infective in Nicotiana clevelandii leaf extracts for 1 day at room temperature and for 15 days at 4d?C, but lost infectivity after 1 day at -20d?C or after dilution to 10^--⁴. Its infectivity and longevity in vitro were not altered by addition of 1 mg/litre bentonite to the extraction buffer. Infectivity in leaf extracts was abolished by treatment with 50% (v/v) ether, 10% (v/v) chloroform or 8% (v/v) n-butanol, but not by treatment for 30 min with RNase A at up to 100 ng/ml. In attempts to purify GRV(C), nearly all the infectivity from N. clevelandii extracts was found in the pellets from centrifugation at 65 000 g for 1. 5 h; infectivity also occurred in a cell membrane fraction that collected at the top of a 30% sucrose ‘cushion’ containing 4% polyethylene glycol and 0.2 M NaCI. However, no virus-like particles were found in either type of preparation by electron microscopy. Nucleic acid preparations made directly from GRV(C)-infected N. clevelandii leaves were very infective; this infectivity was totally inactivated by treatment for 30 min with RNase A at 10 ng/ml in buffers of both low and high ionic strength and was therefore attributed to ssRNA. When nucleic acid preparations were electrophoresed in gels no virus-specific bands were visible but the position of the infectivity indicated that the infective ssRNA has an apparent mol. wt of c. 1.55 × 10⁶. A similar mol. wt was indicated by the rate of sedimentation of the infective ssRNA in sucrose gradients. Preparations of dsRNA made from GRV(C)-infected N. clevelandii leaves contained a species of mol. wt c. 3.0 × 10⁶; in addition some dsRNA preparations contained an abundant component of mol. wt c. 0.6 × 106 together with several other components of intermediate mol. wt. Similar patterns of bands were observed in dsRNA preparations made from Nigerian-grown groundnut material infected with GRV(C) alone, or with GRV(C) + GRAV, or with GRV(G) + GRAV. The properties of GRV closely resemble those of two other viruses that depend on luteoviruses for transmission by aphids, carrot mottle virus and lettuce speckles mottle virus.     

Groundnut rosette and its assistor virus

Chlorotic rosette from Malawi (isolate CR1), passed through Stylosanthes gracilis and S. juncea, was not subsequently transmissible from groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea) by Aphis craccivora or A. gossypii, but with S. mucronata transmissibility was occasionally regained after a period of time. Aphid transmissibility was similarly lost after passage of two isolates (a chlorotic rosette from Rhodesia, CR2, and a green rosette from Nigeria, GR) through soybean (Soja max) and after manual inoculation to groundnuts. Groundnut plants that remained symptomless after exposure to rosette infection by aphids often contained a virus that restored aphid transmissibility when introduced into groundnuts containing the vectorless virus from that isolate. Groundnut rosette disease therefore consists of a symptom-inducing virus that we call groundnut rosette virus (GRV) and a symptomless assistor virus (GRAV) that must be present for aphid transmission. The interactions between the GRV and GRAV of chlorotic and green rosette, and their transmission by different vector races, are described.     

Different variants of the satellite RNA of groundnut rosette virus are responsible for the chlorotic and green forms of groundnut rosette disease*

Groundnut plants with symptoms of rosette disease contain groundnut rosette virus (GRV), but GRV is transmitted by Aphis craccivora only from plants that also contain groundnut rosette assistor virus (GRAV). Two main forms of rosette disease are recognised, ‘chlorotic rosette’ and ‘green rosette’. GRV cultures invariably possess a satellite RNA and this is the major cause of rosette symptoms: satellite-free isolates derived from GRV cultures from Nigerian plants with chlorotic or green rosette, or from Malawian plants with chlorotic rosette, induced no symptoms, or only transient mild mottle or interveinal yellowing, in groundnut. When the satellite RNA species from GRV cultures from Nigerian green or Malawian chlorotic rosette were reintroduced into the three satellite-free isolates in homologous and heterologous combinations, the ability to induce rosette symptoms was restored and the type of rosette induced was that of the cultures from which the satellite RNA was derived. Thus different forms of the satellite are responsible for the different forms of rosette disease. Other forms of the satellite induce only mild chlorosis or mottle symptoms in groundnut. Individual plants may contain more than one form of the satellite, and variations in their relative predominance are suggested to account for the variable symptoms (ranging from overall yellowing to mosaic) seen in some plants graft-inoculated with chlorotic rosette.     

Comparison of the coat protein of groundnut rosette assistor virus with those of other luteoviruses

The coat protein gene of groundnut rosette assistor virus (GRAV) was cloned and sequenced. The deduced amino acid sequences of the coat protein and of another protein encoded in a different, overlapping, reading frame resemble those of other luteoviruses. Four monoclonal antibodies against GRAV, prepared using denatured coat protein as immunogen, also reacted with some other luteoviruses in ELISA. Nevertheless, they will be useful as reagents for the identification of GRAV infections in groundnut.     

The nature of the resistance in groundnut to rosette disease

Groundnut rosette disease is caused by a complex of three agents, groundnut rosette virus (GRV) and its satellite RNA, and groundnut rosette assistor virus (GRAV); the satellite RNA is mainly responsible for the disease symptoms. Groundnut genotypes possessing resistance to rosette disease were shown to be highly resistant (though not immune) to GRV and therefore to its satellite RNA, but were fully susceptible to GRAV.     

Spread of potato leafroll virus is decreased from plants of potato clones in which virus accumulation is restricted

Tubers of eight potato clones infected with potato leafroll luteovirus (PLRV) were planted as ‘infectors’ in a field crop grown, at Invergowrie, of virus-free potato cv. Maris Piper in 1989. The mean PLRV contents of the infector clones, determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of leaf tissue, ranged from c. 65 to 2400 ng/g leaf. Myzus persicae colonised the crop shortly after shoot emergence in late May and established large populations on all plants, exceeding 2000/plant by 27 June. Aphid infestations were controlled on 30 June by insecticide sprays. Aphid-borne spread of PLRV from plants of the infector clones was assessed in August by ELISA of foliage samples from the neighbouring Maris Piper ‘receptors’. Up to 89% infection occurred in receptor plots containing infector clones with high concentrations of PLRV. Spread was least (as little as 6%) in plots containing infectors in which PLRV concentrations were low. Primary PLRV infection in guard areas of the crop away from infectors was 4%. Some receptor plants became infected where no leaf contact was established with the infectors, suggesting that some virus spread may have been initiated by aphids walking across the soil.     

Specificity of the effect of sap-transmissible viruses in increasing the accumulation of luteoviruses in co-infected plants

The concentration of potato leafroll luteovirus (PLRV) (c. 1300 ng/g leaf) in singly infected Nicotiana clevelandii plants was increased up to 10-fold in plants co-infected with each of several potyviruses, or with narcissus mosaic potexvirus, carrot mottle virus or each of three tobravirus isolates. With the tobraviruses, PLRV concentration was increased equally by co-infection with either NM-type isolates (coat protein-free cultures containing RNA-1) or M-type isolates (particle-producing cultures containing RNA-1 and RNA-2). In contrast, the accumulation of PLRV was not substantially affected by co-infection with either of two nepoviruses, cucumber mosaic cucumovirus, broad bean mottle bromovirus, alfalfa mosaic virus, pea enation mosaic virus or parsnip yellow fleck virus. The specificity of these interactions between PLRV and sap-transmissible viruses was retained in tests made in Nicotiana benthamiana and when beet western yellows luteovirus was used instead of PLRV.     

Detection of a Luteovirus in Groundnut Rosette Diseased Groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea) by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay and Immunoelectron Microscopy

In groundnut rosette diseased groundnut plants collected near Zaria, Nigeria, a luteovirus was detected by ELISA and ISEM. In ELISA only beet western yellows virus antiserum reacted, while in ISEM luteovirus particles were trapped by antisera beet western yellows virus, potato leafroll virus, pea leafroll virus and barley yellow dwarf virus. The data are in agreement with the interpretation that the assistor of groundnut rosette virus is possibly a member of the luteovirus group.     

Resistance to groundnut rosette disease in wild Arachis species

One hundred and sixteen accessions representing 28 species in the genus Arachis were evaluated for resistance to groundnut rosette disease using an infector row technique during the 1996/97, 1997/98, 1998/99 and 1999/2000 growing seasons at Chitedze, Malawi. Of these, a total of 25 accessions belonging to Arachis diogoi (1 accession), A. hoehnei (2), A. kretschmeri (2), A. cardenasii (2), A. villosa (1), A. pintoi (5), A. kuhlmannii (2), A. appressipila (3), A. stenosperma (5), A. decora (1), and A. triseminata (1) showed resistance to the groundnut rosette disease. No visible disease symptoms were observed in several accessions belonging to A. appressipila, A. cardenasii, A. hoehnei, A. kretschmeri, A. villosa, A. pintoi, A. kuhlmannii, and A. stenosperma. Some accessions in A. appressipila, A. diogoi, A. stenosperma, A. decora, A. triseminata, A. kretschmeri, A. kuhlmannii, and A. pintoi were resistant to all three components of rosette, Groundnut rosette ass is tor virus (GRAV), Groundnut rosette virus (GRV) and its satellite RNA (sat. RNA). Two accessions in A. stenosperma and one accession in A. kuhlmannii showed the presence of all three components of the rosette disease. Several wild Arachis accessions were resistant to GRAV. All the accessions of A. batizocoi (4), A. benensis (2), A. duranensis (46), A. dardani (1), A. ipaensis (1), A. magna (1), A. monticola (3), A. oteroi (1), A. pusilla (4), and A. valida (2) were susceptible to rosette disease. In all these accessions, infected plants were chlorotic and severely stunted. The value of exploitation of the resistance in wild Arachis species in rosette resistance breeding programmes is discussed.     

The effects of temperature on the availability and acquisition of potato leafroll luteovirus by Myzus persicae

The concentration of potato leafroll luteovirus (PLRV) did not differ in potato plants with secondary infections grown at 15°C or 27°C. Detached leaves of plants grown at 15°C or 27°C were used as sources of PLRV for peach-potato aphids (Myzus persicae Sulz.) both at 15°C and 27°C. At comparable temperature during virus acquisition, aphids which fed on leaves of plants kept previously at 15°C contained more viral antigen detected by ELISA than aphids which fed on leaves of plants grown at 27°C. The aphids which acquired PLRV at 27°C contained evidently more viral antigen than those which acquired PLRV at 15°C. The greatest amount of PLRV was found in the aphids which acquired the virus at 27°C from the leaves of plants kept at 15°C. The ability of M. persicae to transmit PLRV to Physalis ftoridana Rydb. generally decreased with decrease in the amount of PLRV in vectors.     

Characterisation of an Australian isolate of tomato yellow top virus

An Australian isolate of tomato yellow top virus (TYTV-A) was transmitted in the persistent manner by the aphid Myzus persicae. Its host range was mainly restricted to the Solanaceae, though Capsella bursa-pastoris and Gomphrena globosa were symptomlessly infected. TYTV-A was purified from Physalis Joridana, using an enzyme-assisted method in which the initial tissue homogenate was incubated with cellulase. Yields of purified virus were 100–900 μg/kg tissue and depended on the age of the infected plants. Maximum yields were obtained 4–5 wk after inoculation. The particles of TYTV-A were c. 24 nm in diameter, had a buoyant density of 1.34 in caesium sulphate and a coat protein mol. wt of c. 25.7 × 10³. TYTV-A was shown to be closely related serologically to potato leafroll virus (PLRV), TYTV from New Zealand and more distantly related to several other luteoviruses. An antiserum to TYTV-A was used in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests to detect TYTV in field-infected tomato plants and also luteoviruses from potato plants with leafroll symptoms. It is clear that TYTV-A is a luteovirus closely related to PLRV.     

Evidence of simple genetic control in potato of ability to restrict potato leaf roll virus concentration in leaves

Summary The concentration of potato leaf roll virus (PLRV), measured by quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, in foliage of plants of cv Maris Piper and clone G7445(1) with secondary infection was 2,700 ng/g leaf and 120 ng/g leaf, respectively. In experiments to examine the genetic control of their ability to restrict the multiplication of PLRV, reciprocal crosses were made between these two clones. Among 40 genotypes from the progeny of the crosses, about half had a low PLRV concentration in plants with secondary infection and the other half had a high concentration. The possibility of monogenic control of the character that restricts PLRV multiplication in such clones of Solanum tuberosum is discussed.     

Restricted distribution of potato leafroll virus antigen in resistant potato genotypes and its effect on transmission of the virus by aphids

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure the concentration of potato leafroll virus (PLRV) antigen in different parts of field-grown secondarily infected plants of three potato genotypes known to differ in resistance to infection. The antigen concentration in leaves of cv. Maris Piper (susceptible) was 10–30 times greater than that in cv. Pentland Crown or G 7445(1), a breeder's line (both resistant). Differences between genotypes in antigen concentration were smaller in petioles and tubers (5–10-fold) and in above-ground stems (about 4-fold), and were least in below-ground stems, stolons and roots (about 2-fold). PLRV antigen, detected by fluorescent antibody staining of tissue sections, was confined to phloem companion cells. In Pentland Crown, the decrease in PLRV antigen concentration in leaf mid-veins and petioles, relative to that in Maris Piper, was proportional to the decrease in number of PLRV-containing companion cells; this decrease was greater in the external phloem than in the internal phloem. The spread of PLRV infection within the phloem system seems to be impaired in the resistant genotypes. Green peach aphids (Myzuspersicae) acquired < 2800 pg PLRV/aphid when fed for 4 days on infected field-grown Maris Piper plants and < 58% of such aphids transmitted the virus to Physalis floridana test plants. In contrast, aphids fed on infected Pentland Crown plants acquired <120 pg PLRV/aphid and <3% transmitted the virus to P. floridana. The ease with which M. persicae acquired and transmitted PLRV from field-grown Maris Piper plants decreased greatly after the end of June without a proportionate drop in PLRV concentration. Spread of PLRV in potato crops should be substantially decreased by growing cultivars in which the virus multiplies to only a limited extent.     

A variant of the satellite RNA of groundnut rosette virus that induces brilliant yellow blotch mosaic symptoms in Nicotiana benthamiana

Some Malawian cultures of groundnut rosette virus (GRV) give rise to variants that, although still causing symptoms of the chlorotic type of rosette in groundnut, induce brilliant yellow blotch mosaic symptoms, instead of the usual veinal chlorosis and mild mottle, in Nicotiana benthamiana. One such isolate (YB) induced the formation in infected plants of a 0.9 kbp dsRNA having extensive sequence homology with molecules of similar size in other naturally occurring isolates of GRV. These dsRNA molecules were shown to be double-stranded forms of single-stranded satellite RNA molecules. Experiments in which the satellite was removed from and restored to isolate YB, or exchanged with those from other GRV isolates, showed that it carries the determinant for yellow blotch mosaic symptoms. Plants inoculated with the 0.9 kbp dsRNA (denatured or undenatured) developed yellow blotch mosaic even when the satellite-free GRV helper was not inoculated until 11 days later. The satellite RNA is therefore a very stable molecule. Prior infection of N. benthamiana with a GRV isolate containing a normal form of the satellite protected against expression of yellow blotch mosaic symptoms when the plants were later inoculated with isolate YB, whereas prior infection with satellite-free isolates did not. This provides a simple method of determining whether a GRV isolate has an associated satellite RNA. The YB satellite seems to be a newly recognised variant additional to those known to cause the chlorotic, green and other forms of groundnut rosette disease.     

Additional sources of resistance to groundnut rosette disease in groundnut germplasm and breeding lines

Groundnut rosette, a virus disease of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) transmitted by the aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch, reduces yield in susceptible cultivars by 30–100%. Additional sources were sought in germplasm accessions involving 2301 lines from different sources and from 252 advanced breeding lines derived from crosses involving earlier identified sources of resistance to rosette. The lines were evaluated in field screening trials using an infector row technique during 1996 and 1997 growing seasons. Among the germplasm lines, 65 accessions showed high levels of resistance while 134 breeding lines were resistant. All rosette disease resistant lines were susceptible to groundnut rosette assistor virus. This work identified germplasm and breeding lines that will contribute to an integrated management of groundnut rosette disease. These new sources also provide an opportunity to eliminate yield losses due to the rosette disease.