Evaluation and treatment of BRCA-positive patients

The recent discovery of the breast cancer-associated genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 has now made it possible to identify individuals who are at a very high risk for the future development of breast cancer. To some extent, however, society has fallen victim to its molecular genetic technology. The significance of these discoveries to the detection, treatment, and prevention of breast cancer cannot be overstated. Nevertheless, the appropriate administration and interpretation of BRCA genetic testing and the treatment of BRCA-positive patients remain controversial issues. Complexities of BRCA testing require that such genetic screening be restricted to selected high-risk patients and that test results be interpreted by a knowledgeable molecular geneticist. Although no medical prophylaxis has been demonstrated to be of benefit in BRCA-positive patients, recent evidence suggests that a prophylactic mastectomy, with or without reconstruction, is a reasonable treatment option that substantially reduces cancer risk.     

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in clinical genetic testing: the characterization of the clinical significance of genetic variants and their application in clinical research for BRCA1

Clinical genetic testing is increasingly employed in the medical management of cancer patients. These tests support a variety of clinical decisions by providing results that indicate risk for future disease, confirmation of diagnoses, and more recently, therapeutic selection and prognosis. Most genetic variation detected during clinical testing involves single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Continued advances in the technologies of genetic analyses make these tests increasingly sensitive, cost-effective and timely, which contribute to their increased utilization. Conversely, it has proven difficult to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants that do not obviously truncate the open reading frames of genes. These genetic variants of uncertain clinical significance diminish the value of genetic test results. This article highlights a variety of approaches that have emerged from research in diverse disciplines to solve the problem, including the application of information about common SNPs in multiple methods to better characterize clinically uncertain variants. Hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, and in particular BRCA1, provides a framework for this discussion. BRCA1 is particularly interesting in this respect since clinical genetic testing by direct DNA sequencing for over 50,000 patients in North America has revealed approximately 1500 genetic variants to date. This large data set combined with the clinical significance of BRCA1 have resulted in research groups selecting BRCA1 as a preferred gene to evaluate novel methods in this field. Finally, the lessons learned through work with BRCA1 are highly applicable to many other genes associated with cancer risk.     

Law-medicine interfacing: patenting of human genes and mutations

Mutations, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), deletions and genetic rearrangements in specific genes in the human genome account for not only our physical characteristics and behavior, but can lead to many in-born and acquired diseases. Such changes in the genome can also predispose people to cancers, as well as significantly affect the metabolism and efficacy of many drugs, resulting in some cases in acute toxicity to the drug. The testing of the presence of such genetic mutations and rearrangements is of great practical and commercial value, leading many of these genes and their mutations/deletions and genetic rearrangements to be patented. A recent decision by a judge in the Federal District Court in the Southern District of New York, has created major uncertainties, based on the revocation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene patents, in the eligibility of all human and presumably other gene patents. This article argues that while patents on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes could be challenged based on a lack of utility, the patenting of the mutations and genetic rearrangements is of great importance to further development and commercialization of genetic tests that can save human lives and prevent suffering, and should be allowed.     

Management updates for women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation

In most cases of families with breast and ovarian cancer, the pattern of cancers in the family can be attributed to mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Genetic testing for these cancer susceptibility genes typically takes place in the context of comprehensive genetic counseling. Strategies have been developed for the medical management of women at high risk of developing breast cancer, including options for screening and prophylactic surgery. BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers are recommended to undergo prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy by age 35-40 years or when childbearing is complete. This surgery significantly reduces the risk of ovarian cancer and also reduces the risk of breast cancer when performed in premenopausal mutation carriers. For breast cancer management, BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers are offered the options of increased surveillance, with or without chemoprevention, or prophylactic surgery. Currently, BRCA carrier status is not used as an independent prognostic factor regarding systemic treatment options.     

On doing ‘being ordinary’: women's accounts of BRCA testing and maternal responsibility

Abstract

In recent months, genetic testing for the breast and ovarian cancer genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, has again hit the headlines in the UK press. Four women, all from families with a strong breast cancer pedigree, have asked the Human Fertility and Embryology Authority for permission to screen their embryos for BRCA1/2 mutations. Although this may be a dramatic example of parental responsibility, other studies have shown that women at risk of BRCA-related cancers frequently cite responsibility to others as an important influence on their testing and treatment decision making. In this paper, I explore the decision-making explanations that women at risk of BRCA-related breast and ovarian cancer provide when accounting for their decision to undergo genetic testing. In doing so, I treat women's accounts critically, and examine how and why the women verbalize their explanations in the manner that they do.     

Genetic counselling and testing for susceptibility to breast,ovarian and colon cancer: where are we today?

Recent advances in our understanding of the genetic characteristics of cancer will change approaches to genetic screening and counselling. Cancer results from multiple, cumulative mutations in genes that regulate cell replication and differentiation. In familial cancer a germ-line mutation is passed on in an autosomal dominant pattern, but cancer will develop in people who inherit the defect only if other mutations also occur in susceptible somatic cells. The tumour-suppressor gene known as BRCA1 is thought to affect half of those families who have an inherited breast cancer syndrome and most families with a breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Another gene, BRCA2, is thought to affect most of the remaining families with a breast-cancer-only syndrome. Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) is caused by mutations in surveillance genes that protect DNA from the spontaneous errors that occur during cell division. Because there are no outcome data on which to base practice guidelines for genetic screening or management of asymptomatic carriers in families at risk, testing should be restricted to research settings.     

Molecular characterization of germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes from breast cancer families in Taiwan

A total of 18 families with multiple cases of breast cancer were identified from southern Taiwan, and 5 of these families were found to carry cancer-associated germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. One novel cryptic splicing mutation of the BRCA1 gene, found in two unrelated families, was shown to be a deletion of 10 bp near the branch site in intron 7. This mutation causes an insertion of 59 nucleotides derived from intron 7 and results in a frameshift, leading to premature translational termination of BRCA1 mRNA in exon 8. Deletions of 2670delC, 3073delT and 6696-7delTC in the BRCA2 gene were found in three other breast cancer families. All three deletions are predicted to generate frameshifts and to result in the premature termination of BRCA2 protein translation. Several genetic polymorphisms in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were also detected in this investigation. Received: 28 September 1998 / Accepted: 20 November 1998     

Functional assays for BRCA1 and BRCA2

Genetic testing for the two major breast cancer susceptibility genes has now been available for several years with more than 70,000 people tested in the USA alone. While the current genetic testing identifies many sequence alterations there are problems with both sensitivity and specificity of the assay. In particular, the genetic testing is limited in its ability to determine which of the many missense mutations identified in BRCA1 and BRCA2 actually predispose to cancer and which are simply neutral alterations. Here we will focus on the limitations in test result interpretation and we will explore how biochemistry and cell biology can help to clarify these issues. Although we limit our discussion to genetic testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2, the problem is common to an expanding group of genes, including ATM and MSH2, in which germ-line missense mutations may also confer increased risk of cancer. Here we advocate the use of functional assays to complement genetic data in the analysis of unclassified missense mutations and propose a set of standards to conduct and interpret these assays.     

The predictive value of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing

Genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, two genes predisposing to breast and ovarian cancers, is available to women with a relevant family history. The aim of this study was to estimate the positive and negative predictive value of clinical sequence analysis of these genes. A reference graph showing positive and negative predictive values over a range of pre-test risk was derived, taking into account the sensitivity and specificity of a full-sequence analysis test. High positive and negative predictive values were found for women with pre-test risk between 4% and 40%, a range of risk commonly seen in clinical testing. The predictive value of full sequence and single-site analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2, therefore, compares favorably with other diagnostic medical tests. Our results provide a numerical estimate of the predictive value of BRCA testing, and as such, provide a valuable tool to healthcare providers and families as they interpret BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results.     

Identification of a Comprehensive Spectrum of Genetic Factors for Hereditary Breast Cancer in a Chinese Population by Next-Generation Sequencing

The genetic etiology of hereditary breast cancer has not been fully elucidated. Although germline mutations of high-penetrance genes such as BRCA1/2 are implicated in development of hereditary breast cancers, at least half of all breast cancer families are not linked to these genes. To identify a comprehensive spectrum of genetic factors for hereditary breast cancer in a Chinese population, we performed an analysis of germline mutations in 2,165 coding exons of 152 genes associated with hereditary cancer using next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 99 breast cancer patients from families of cancer patients regardless of cancer types. Forty-two deleterious germline mutations were identified in 21 genes of 34 patients, including 18 (18.2%) BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, 3 (3%) TP53 mutations, 5 (5.1%) DNA mismatch repair gene mutations, 1 (1%) CDH1 mutation, 6 (6.1%) Fanconi anemia pathway gene mutations, and 9 (9.1%) mutations in other genes. Of seven patients who carried mutations in more than one gene, 4 were BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, and their average onset age was much younger than patients with only BRCA1/2 mutations. Almost all identified high-penetrance gene mutations in those families fulfill the typical phenotypes of hereditary cancer syndromes listed in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, except two TP53 and three mismatch repair gene mutations. Furthermore, functional studies of MSH3 germline mutations confirmed the association between MSH3 mutation and tumorigenesis, and segregation analysis suggested antagonism between BRCA1 and MSH3. We also identified a lot of low-penetrance gene mutations. Although the clinical significance of those newly identified low-penetrance gene mutations has not been fully appreciated yet, these new findings do provide valuable epidemiological information for the future studies. Together, these findings highlight the importance of genetic testing based on NCCN guidelines and a multi-gene analysis using NGS may be a supplement to traditional genetic counseling.     

Mutation Analysis of BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and BRD7 in a Hospital-Based Series of German Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive form of breast carcinoma with a poor prognosis. Recent evidence suggests that some patients with TNBC harbour germ-line mutations in DNA repair genes which may render their tumours susceptible to novel therapies such as treatment with PARP inhibitors. In the present study, we have investigated a hospital-based series of 40 German patients with TNBC for the presence of germ-line mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and BRD7 genes. Microfluidic array PCR and next-generation sequencing was used for BRCA1 and BRCA2 analysis while conventional high-resolution melting and Sanger sequencing was applied to study the coding regions of PALB2 and BRD7, respectively. Truncating mutations in BRCA1 were found in six patients, and truncating mutations in BRCA2 and PALB2 were detected in one patient each, whereas no truncating mutation was identified in BRD7. One patient was a double heterozygote for the PALB2 mutation, c.758insT, and a BRCA1 mutation, c.927delA. Our results confirm in a hospital-based setting that a substantial proportion of German TNBC patients (17.5%) harbour germ-line mutations in genes involved in homology-directed DNA repair, with a preponderance of BRCA1 mutations. Triple-negative breast cancer should be considered as an additional criterion for future genetic counselling and diagnostic sequencing.     

Evaluation of the needs of male carriers of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who have undergone genetic counseling

To date, the concerns of men at risk of inheriting a BRCA1 mutation or a BRCA2 mutation have received little attention. It had been anticipated that few men would be interested in predictive testing when a BRCA mutation was identified in their family. However, these men are often affected emotionally by diagnoses of breast cancer in their relatives and may themselves harbor fears that cancer will develop. Male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations are at increased risk of development of cancers of several types, including those of the breast and prostate. We conducted an evaluation of the needs and experiences of 59 male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations followed at either the University of Toronto or Creighton University. We assessed their motivations for seeking genetic counseling and testing, involvement in family discussions of breast and ovarian cancer, risk perception, changes in cancer-screening practices, and overall satisfaction with the genetic-counseling process. The principal motivation for seeking genetic counseling was concern for their daughters. The majority (88%) of men participated in family conversations about breast and ovarian cancer, and 47% participated in conversations about prophylactic surgery. Most men believed that they were at increased risk of development of cancer (prostate, breast, colorectal, and skin cancers). However, fewer than one-half (43%) of the men with no previous diagnosis of cancer stated that their prostate cancer-surveillance practices had changed after they had received genetic test results. More than one-half (55%) had intrusive thoughts about their cancer risk. Although levels of satisfaction were high, practitioners should be aware of (a) potential pressures influencing men to request predictive testing, (b) the difficulties that men encounter in establishing surveillance regimens for breast and prostate cancer, and (c) the general lack of information about men's particular experiences in the medical community.     

Information needs of mothers regarding communicating BRCA1/2 cancer genetic test results to their children

Mothers who participate in genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer risk must decide if, when, and how to ultimately share their BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) test results with their minor-age children. One of the primary aides for mothers in making this decision is cancer genetic counseling. However, counseling is limited in how well it can educate mothers about such decisions without the availability of resources that are specific to family communication and genetic testing per se. In an effort to fill this gap and identify mothers most likely to benefit from such resources, surveys were conducted with 187 mothers undergoing BRCA1/2 testing who had children 8-21 years old. Data were collected weeks after genetic testing but prior to mothers' learning of their test results; quantitative assessments of informational resource needs (i.e., speaking with previous BRCA1/2 testing participants who are parents regarding their experiences, reading educational literature about options and what to expect, speaking with a family counselor, attending a family support group, and self-nominated other resources), testing motivations, decision making vigilance, and decisional conflict regarding communicating test results to children were included. Mothers' most-to-least frequently cited information resource needs were: literature (93.4%), family counseling (85.8%), prior participants (79.0%), support groups (53.9%), and other (28.9%; e.g., pediatricians and psychologists). Seventy-eight percent of mothers were interested in accessing three or more resources. In multivariate regression analyses, testing motivations (beta = 0.35, p = 0.03), decision-making vigilance (beta = 0.16, p = 0.00), and decisional conflict (beta = 0.10, p = 0.00) were associated with mothers' need level; mothers with a greater interest in testing to learn about their children's risks, those with more vigilant decision-making styles, and those with higher decisional conflict had the greatest need. In conjunction with enhanced genetic counseling focusing on family disclosure, educational literature, and psychosocial support may promote improved outcomes.     

Africanization in the United States: replacement of feral European honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) by an African hybrid swarm

The expansion of Africanized honeybees from South America to the southwestern United States in <50 years is considered one of the most spectacular biological invasions yet documented. In the American tropics, it has been shown that during their expansion Africanized honeybees have low levels of introgressed alleles from resident European populations. In the United States, it has been speculated, but not shown, that Africanized honeybees would hybridize extensively with European honeybees. Here we report a continuous 11-year study investigating temporal changes in the genetic structure of a feral population from the southern United States undergoing Africanization. Our microsatellite data showed that (1) the process of Africanization involved both maternal and paternal bidirectional gene flow between European and Africanized honeybees and (2) the panmitic European population was replaced by panmitic mixtures of A. m. scutellata and European genes within 5 years after Africanization. The post-Africanization gene pool (1998-2001) was composed of a diverse array of recombinant classes with a substantial European genetic contribution (mean 25-37%). Therefore, the resulting feral honeybee population of south Texas was best viewed as a hybrid swarm.     

What does my doctor think? Preferences for knowing the doctor's opinion among women considering clinical testing for BRCA1/2 mutations

The traditional emphasis on nondirectiveness in genetic counseling has become increasingly controversial with the rapid expansion of genetic testing in clinical medicine. This study was done to determine whether women considering clinical testing for BRCA1/2 mutations want to know their health care providers' opinions about whether or not they should undergo testing. Participating in the study was a retrospective cohort of 335 women who participated in a university-based clinic offering breast cancer risk assessment, genetic counseling, and BRCA1/2 testing between January, 1996, and April, 1998. A total of 242 women (77%) wanted to know if the doctors at the Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Evaluation Program (BCREP) thought they should be tested, 28 women (9%) were unsure, and 46 women (14%) did not want a BCREP doctor's opinion on testing. A total of 158 women (49%) wanted to know if their primary doctor thought they should be tested, 31 women (10%) were unsure, and 130 women (41%) did not want to know. Desire to know the opinion of the BCREP doctors was inversely associated with having undergone BRCA1/2 testing (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.95) and having a breast cancer diagnosis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99). Desire to know their primary doctor's opinion was inversely associated with having undergone BRCA1/2 testing (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.92). Our study suggests that over three-quarters of women who considered clinical testing for BRCA1/2 mutations wanted to know the opinions of the cancer genetics doctors and almost half wanted to know their primary doctor's opinion about whether or not they should undergo testing. These results support the use of models of genetic counseling that allow for sharing the health care providers' opinions when desired by the patient.     

Usefulness of polymorphic markers in exclusion of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in families with aggregation of breast/ovarian cancers

Founder mutations can account for a large proportion of BRCA1/BRCA2 gene abnormalities in a given population. However there is still a need to study the entire gene in many families, even in countries where founder mutations have been identified. It is possible to decrease the number of cases which are studied by complex and expensive sequencing/Southern blot analyses of BRCA1/BRCA2 genes by exclusion of common BRCA1/BRCA2 alleles in a given family by using polymorphic dinucleotide markers. The goal of o ur study was to assess the effectiveness of this method in exclusion of BRCA1/BRCA2 constitutional mutations. In each family, blood samples for genetic analyses were taken from two affected relatives from the same generation. Six polymorphic microsatellite markers linked to BRCA1/BRCA2 genes were analysed. Results obtained with these markers were verified by applying BRCA1 testing for the most common founder mutations in Poland and using exon by exon" sequencing of coding fragments of the BRCA2 gene. Polymorphic markers useful in BRCA1/BRCA2 analyses included only 3 of 6 examined - D17S855, D13S260 and D13S267. Occurrence of commoalleles of BRCA1 was excluded in 3 families and BRCA2 in 5 out of 30 families. Results obtained by testing for BRCA1 Polish founder mutations and BRCA2 sequencing were in agreement with BRCA1 findings based on polymorphic markers. The only exception was family 994 with BRCA1 exon 5 300T/G mutation, in which BRCA1 mutation carrier was excluded by using D17S855. Among 14 families without BRCA1 Polish founder mutations in this gene were excluded in 2 families and BRCA2 mutation was excluded in one family.     

The prevalence of common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among Ashkenazi Jews

Three founder mutations in the cancer-associated genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 occur frequently enough among Ashkenazi Jews to warrant consideration of genetic testing outside the setting of high-risk families with multiple cases of breast or ovarian cancer. We estimated the prevalence of these founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the general population of Ashkenazi Jews according to age at testing, personal cancer history, and family cancer history. We compared the results of anonymous genetic testing of blood samples obtained in a survey of >5,000 Jewish participants from the Washington, DC, area with personal and family cancer histories obtained from questionnaires completed by the participants. In all subgroups defined by age and cancer history, fewer mutations were found in this community sample than in clinical series studied to date. For example, 11 (10%) of 109 Jewish women who had been given a diagnosis of breast cancer in their forties carried one of the mutations. The most important predictor of mutation status was a previous diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer. In men and in women never given a diagnosis of cancer, family history of breast cancer before age 50 years was the strongest predictor. As interest in genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the Jewish community broadens, community-based estimates such as these help guide those seeking and those offering such testing. Even with accurate estimates of the likelihood of carrying a mutation and the likelihood of developing cancer if a mutation is detected, the most vexing clinical problems remain.     

Referral and experience with genetic testing among women with early onset breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine whether physicians refer women with early onset breast cancer for genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2, and how women respond to being offered testing and use the results. A web-based survey was distributed to 1221 women with early onset breast cancer. The survey included 158 questions divided into the following sections: demographics, family history of cancer, medical history, treatment history, and experience with genetic testing. Of 551 women diagnosed since 1993 who responded to the survey (45.1%), less than half (45%, n = 246) had ever discussed genetic testing with their physician and/or been referred to see a genetic counselor. Women with a family history of cancer (53%) and Ashkenazi Jewish women (81%) were more likely to have been referred. Of those who had discussed testing, 60% had undergone or were interested in testing. Overall 92 women were tested and 19 (20.6%) of these tested positive for a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Fourteen (74%) who tested positive subsequently underwent prophylactic surgery. Satisfaction with counseling and the decision to be tested was high. Among women who were not offered testing, the fact that the test had not been offered by their physician (89%), and fear of discrimination (83%) were the two most frequently cited factors for lack of interest in testing. A substantial number of women are not being referred to genetic counseling and/or testing after a diagnosis of early onset breast cancer. Among those who were tested, there was high interest in prophylactic surgery after confirmation of a BRCA1/2 mutation.     

Knowledge, attitudes, and utilization of BRCA1/2 testing among women with early-onset breast cancer

A total of 2,400 questionnaires were mailed to members of two mid-Atlantic breast cancer awareness/support groups to investigate the association between attitudes, knowledge, and use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with early-onset breast cancer. Of the 493 (21%) questionnaires returned, 406 respondents had a diagnosis of breast cancer, of whom 248 were diagnosed prior to age 50 and included in the analyses. Eighty-three percent (206/248) of these women had heard of BRCA1/2 testing and 12.5% (31/248) had undergone BRCA1/2 testing. Among women who had heard of BRCA1/2 testing, women who had been tested were younger (p = 0.03), more likely to have a college education (p = 0.03), more likely to have a family member who had undergone BRCA1/2 testing (p = 0.005), and had greater knowledge, more positive attitudes, and fewer negative attitudes about BRCA1/2 testing (p = 0.02, p = 0.004, and p = 0.004, respectively). In this sample, knowledge regarding BRCA1/2 testing is high, but uptake of genetic testing is low. Lack of information regarding how genetic testing might alter health-care decisions and fear about the genetic testing procedure, its costs, and possible false-positive results are associated with low uptake of genetic testing. Further education regarding these specific points may enhance the use of genetic testing.