再可塑性在学习记忆中作用的研究进展

突触可塑性是学习记忆功能的重要细胞机制,也是神经科学领域的研究热点之一,其中长时程增强(long-term potentiation,LTP)与长时程抑制(long-term depression,LTD)是突触可塑性的两种主要表现形式。作为突触可塑性高级形式的再可塑性(metaplasticity),是指突触可塑性的可塑性,即突触活动的过往史对后继的突触可塑性产生影响,这表明突触的可塑性依赖于当前的突触"状态",因此对探究大脑学习记忆功能与疾病对认知的影响具有重要意义。自再可塑性的概念提出以来,便引起了广泛关注,大量的实验现象与细胞机制的研究成果已经使再可塑性的理论体系逐渐完善。尤其是近年来,人们发现再可塑性调节不仅可以影响突触可塑性,在个体水平上,再可塑性调节也可以提高动物的学习记忆能力,并且可以调控神经网络对特定信息的编码。这些研究成果不仅极大地丰富了再可塑性的理论体系,也为人们探究学习记忆功能开辟了新的道路。本文从以下三个方面对再可塑性调节的研究进展进行了概括与总结:(1)再可塑性的主要分子机制;(2)再可塑性对学习记忆功能的影响;(3)再可塑性领域的研究展望。     

短时程突触可塑性的功能意义

短时程的突触可塑性是突触可塑性的一种重要表现形式,对实现神经系统的正常功能起着重要作用.突触的短时程可塑性能够加强突触传递的确定性,调节大脑皮层兴奋和抑制之间的平衡,形成神经活动的时间、空间特性,形成并调节皮层丘脑网络的同步振荡.突触的短时程可塑性可能也参与了注意、启动效应、睡眠节律和学习记忆等神经系统高级功能的实现.     

AMPA受体的磷酸化与突触可塑性

突触可塑性在学习记忆中发挥了重要作用,AMPA(α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid,AMPA)受体功能和运输的调节是突触可塑性机制研究的重要环节。在突触可塑性发生过程中,激酶和磷酸酶能够调节AMPA受体C末端的磷酸化水平,进而影响AMPA受体运输。对于AMPA受体磷酸化的研究能够加深我们对突触可塑性机制的理解。     

Gamma神经振荡产生机制及其功能研究进展

Gamma神经振荡的频率在30～100 Hz之间,存在于动物和人类大脑的多个区域,如丘脑、体感皮层以及海马等部位,在各个尺度水平上都可被检测到.抑制性中间神经元组成的神经网络是产生此高频节律性活动的主要条件之一.皮层的gamma神经振荡与丘脑-皮层系统有关.Gamma神经振荡具有易化突触可塑性和调节神经网络的作用,主要参与感觉特征绑定、选择性注意以及记忆等高级功能.     

PSD-95与脑缺血的关系及其调控机制研究

PSD-95（突触后密度蛋白-95）在突触后密度区含量丰富,具有复杂的结构域,与膜受体、离子通道、细胞粘附因子和信号分子等相互作用聚集成大分子复合物,在突触的可塑性、学习记忆、大脑的病理生理紊乱等起重要作用。PSD-95与脑缺血神经元损伤和凋亡的分子机制有密切联系。脑缺血再灌注后PSD-95在缺血侧皮层的变化表现为PSD．95阳性细胞数的减少和细胞形态的受损改变。抑制NMDA受体活性的治疗策略包括破坏受体本身、钙离子通道阻滞剂、破坏PSD-95／NMDAR相互作用、破坏PSD-95／nNOS相互作用、nNOS抑制剂药物干预。已有研究发现在大鼠大脑中动脉栓塞模型中抑制PSD-95复合体之间的相互作用可以改善脑缺血。实验性的PSD-95抑制剂减少了短时间和长时间局部脑缺血大鼠的梗死面积、并恢复相应的运动功能治疗脑缺血。本文重点研究PSD-95与脑缺血的关系及其调控机制。     

突触细胞黏附分子在应激中作用的研究进展

突触细胞黏附分子是一类介导突触前、后膜结构和功能互作的膜表面糖蛋白,可以动态调节突触活动和可塑性,其表达与功能受到环境因素调控。突触细胞黏附分子亦是应激反应重要的效应分子之一,可介导应激对认知和情绪的不良影响。本文综述近年来突触细胞黏附分子在应激中作用的研究进展,旨在为应激相关障碍的分子机制研究和药物研发提供思路。     

受体、突触和记忆

大脑中神经元突触间的信号传递是由许多神经递质受体介导的。在过去,Richard L．Huganir实验室一直致力于神经递质受体功能调节的分子机制。而最近,该实验室又聚焦到大脑中一种最主要的兴奋性受体的研究——谷氨酸受体。谷氨酸受体主要可以分为两大类：AMPA受体和NMDA受体。AMPA受体主要介导了快速的兴奋性突触传递;而NMDA受体则在神经可塑性和发育中起到重要作用。实验发现,AMPA受体和NMDA受体都可以被一系列的蛋白激酶磷酸化,而磷酸化的水平则直接影响了这些受体的功能特性,包括通道电导和受体膜定位等。AMPA受体磷酸化的水平同时还在学习和记忆的细胞模型中发生改变,如长时程增强（LTP）和长时程抑制（LTD）。此外,AMPA受体中GluR1亚单位的磷酸化对于各种形式的可塑性以及空间记忆的维持有重要的作用。实验室主要研究突触部位谷氨酸受体在亚细胞水平的定位和聚集的分子机制。最近,一系列可以直接或间接与AMPA和NMDA受体相互作用的蛋白质得以发现,其中包括一个新发现的蛋白家族GRIPs（glutamate receptor interacting proteins）。GRIPs可以直接和AMPA受体的GluR2／3亚单位的C端结合。GRIPs包含7个PDZ结构域,可以介导蛋白与蛋白直接的相互连接,从而把各个AMPA受体交互连接在一起并与其他蛋白相连。另外,GluR2亚单位的c端还可以和兴奋性突触中的蛋白激酶C结合蛋白（PICK1）的PDZ结构域相互作用。另外,GluR2亚单位的C端也可以与一种参与膜融合的蛋白NSF相互作用。这些与AMPA受体相互作用的蛋白质对于受体在膜上的运输以及定位有至关重要的作用。同时,受体与PICK1和GRIP的结合对于小脑运动学习中的LTD有重要作用。总体上说,该实验室发现了一系列可以调节神经递质受体功能的分子机制,这些工作提示受体功能的调节可能是?     

突触可塑性调节过程中蛋白质磷酸化修饰的研究进展

突触可塑性可以导致神经元传递效率的改变,是神经系统发育、学习记忆等脑的高级功能活动中细胞功能的重要基础.蛋白质磷酸化修饰通过蛋白激酶和蛋白磷酸酶之间的动态平衡对突触可塑性和突触传递的长期调节,参与各种脑疾病(包括精神疾病和神经退行性疾病)的发生发展.本文综述了磷酸化修饰和突触可塑性的关系,重点介绍了长时程增强和长时程抑...     

PSD-95 与脑缺血的关系及其调控机制研究

PSD-95(突触后密度蛋白-95)在突触后密度区含量丰富,具有复杂的结构域,与膜受体、离子通道、细胞粘附因子和信号分子 等相互作用聚集成大分子复合物,在突触的可塑性、学习记忆、大脑的病理生理紊乱等起重要作用。PSD-95 与脑缺血神经元损伤 和凋亡的分子机制有密切联系。脑缺血再灌注后PSD-95 在缺血侧皮层的变化表现为PSD-95 阳性细胞数的减少和细胞形态的受 损改变。抑制NMDA 受体活性的治疗策略包括破坏受体本身、钙离子通道阻滞剂、破坏PSD-95/NMDAR 相互作用、破坏 PSD-95/nNOS相互作用、nNOS抑制剂药物干预。已有研究发现在大鼠大脑中动脉栓塞模型中抑制PSD-95 复合体之间的相互作 用可以改善脑缺血。实验性的PSD-95 抑制剂减少了短时间和长时间局部脑缺血大鼠的梗死面积、并恢复相应的运动功能治疗脑 缺血。本文重点研究PSD-95 与脑缺血的关系及其调控机制。     

神经胶质细胞与突触可塑性研究新进展

突触的可塑性是研究学习与记忆的基础,很长时间以来人们对突触的可塑性研究主要集中在神经元和突触上;而胶质细胞的作用较少受到注意。最近的研究发现胶质细胞也参与突触的构成并影响突触的活动。研究表明中枢神经系统中的胶质细胞包括星形胶质细胞、小胶质细胞和少突胶质细胞可分别通过谷氨酸、丝氨酸、甘氨酸、ATP等信号调节突触的可塑性,从而为突触的可塑性研究提供了新的思路和方向,并有助于阐明突触的发生以及学习与记忆的机制。     

The neural cell adhesion molecule and synaptic plasticity

Highly stereotyped patterns of neuronal connections are laid down during the development of the nervous system via a range of activity independent and activity dependent mechanisms. Whereas the coarse hard-wiring of the nervous system appears to rely on molecular recognition events between the neuron, its pathway, and its target, the establishment of precisely patterned functional circuits is thought to be driven by neuronal activity. In this review we discuss the role that the neuronal cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) plays in morphological plasticity. Recent studies on NCAM and its probable species homologue in Aplysia (apCAM) suggests that an individual CAM can function to both promote synaptic plasticity and maintain the structure of the synapse. In the adult brain, changes between stability and plasticity are likely to underlie dynamic morphological changes in synaptic structures associated with learning and memory. In this review we use NCAM as an example to illustrate mechanisms that can change the function of an individual CAM from a molecule that promotes plasticity to one that does not. We also discuss evidence that NCAM promotes plasticity by activating a conventional signal transduction cascade, rather than by modulating adhesion perse. Finally, we consider the evidence that supports a role for NCAM in learning and memory. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Molecular mechanisms coordinating functional and morphological plasticity at the synapse: Role of GluA2/N-cadherin interaction-mediated actin signaling in mGluR-dependent LTD

Long-lasting synaptic plasticity involves changes in both synaptic morphology and electrical signaling (here referred to as structural and functional plasticity). Recent studies have revealed a myriad of molecules and signaling processes that are critical for each of these two forms of plasticity, but whether and how they are mechanistically linked to achieve coordinated changes remain controversial.It is well accepted that functional plasticity at the excitatory synapse is dependent upon the activities of glutamate receptors. While the activation of NMDARs (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors) and/or mGluRs (metabotropic glutamate receptors) is required for the induction of many forms of plasticity, AMPARs (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid receptors), the principal mediators of fast excitatory synaptic transmission, are the ultimate targets of modifications that express functional plasticity. Investigations exploring structural plasticity have been mainly focused on the small membranous protrusions on the dendrites called spines. The morphological regulation of these spines is mediated by the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, the predominant structural component of the synapse. In this regard, the Rho family of GTPases, particularly Rac1, RhoA and Cdc42, is found to be the central regulator of spine actin and structural plasticity of the synapse.It is thought that the collaborative interaction between functional and structural factors underlies the sustained or permanent nature of long-lasting synaptic plasticity such as long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), the most extensively studied forms of synaptic plasticity widely regarded as cellular mechanisms for learning and memory. However, data specifically pertaining to whether and how these two distinct components are linked at the molecular level remain sparse. In this regard, we have identified a number of synaptic proteins that are involved in both structural and functional changes during mGluR-dependent LTD (mGluR-LTD). Among these are the GluA2 (formerly called GluR2) subunit of AMPARs, Rac1 and Rac1-activated kinases. We have discovered that these proteins interact and reciprocally regulate each other, which led us to hypothesize that the GluA2–Rac1 interaction may serve as a coordinator between functional and morphological plasticity. In this review, we will briefly discuss the available evidence to support such a hypothesis.     

Modulating effect of cytokines on mechanisms of synaptic plasticity in the brain

After accumulation of data showing that resident brain cells (neurons, astrocytes, and microglia) produce mediators of the immune system, such as cytokines and their receptors under normal physiological conditions, a critical need emerged for investigating the role of these mediators in cognitive processes. The major problem for understanding the functional role of cytokines in the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity, de novo neurogenesis, and learning and memory is the small number of investigated cytokines. Existing concepts are based on data from just three proinflammatory cytokines: interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. The amount of information in the literature on the functional role of antiinflammatory cytokines in the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity and cognitive functions of mature mammalian brain is dismally low. However, they are of principle importance for understanding the mechanisms of local information processing in the brain, since they modulate the activity of individual cells and local neural networks, being able to reconstruct the processes of synaptic plasticity and intercellular communication, in general, depending on the local ratio of the levels of different cytokines in certain areas of the brain. Understanding the functional role of cytokines in cellular mechanisms of information processing and storage in the brain would allow developing preventive and therapeutic means for the treatment of neuropathologies related to impairment of these mechanisms.     

Synaptically Released Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity in Control of Structural Plasticity and the Cell Surface Distribution of GluA1-AMPA Receptors

Synapses are particularly prone to dynamic alterations and thus play a major role in neuronal plasticity. Dynamic excitatory synapses are located at the membranous neuronal protrusions called dendritic spines. The ability to change synaptic connections involves both alterations at the morphological level and changes in postsynaptic receptor composition. We report that endogenous matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity promotes the structural and functional plasticity of local synapses by its effect on glutamate receptor mobility and content. We used live imaging of cultured hippocampal neurons and quantitative morphological analysis to show that chemical long-term potentiation (cLTP) induces the permanent enlargement of a subset of small dendritic spines in an MMP-dependent manner. We also used a superresolution microscopy approach and found that spine expansion induced by cLTP was accompanied by MMP-dependent immobilization and synaptic accumulation as well as the clustering of GluA1-containing AMPA receptors. Altogether, our results reveal novel molecular and cellular mechanisms of synaptic plasticity.     

Protein kinase signaling in synaptic plasticity and memory

The relay of extracellular signals into changes in cellular physiology involves a Byzantine array of intracellular signaling pathways, of which cytoplasmic protein kinases are a crucial component. In the nervous system, a great deal of effort has focused on understanding the conversion of patterns of synaptic activity into long-lasting changes in synaptic efficacy that are thought to underlie memory. The goal is both to understand synaptic plasticity mechanisms, such as long-term potentiation, at a molecular level and to understand the relationship of these synaptic mechanisms to behavioral memory. Although both involve the activation of multiple signaling pathways, recent studies are beginning to define discrete roles and mechanisms for individual kinases in the different temporal phases of both synaptic and behavioral plasticity.     

Elements of a neurobiological theory of the hippocampus: the role of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in memory

The hypothesis that synaptic plasticity is a critical component of the neural mechanisms underlying learning and memory is now widely accepted. In this article, we begin by outlining four criteria for evaluating the 'synaptic plasticity and memory (SPM)' hypothesis. We then attempt to lay the foundations for a specific neurobiological theory of hippocampal (HPC) function in which activity-dependent synaptic plasticity, such as long-term potentiation (LTP), plays a key part in the forms of memory mediated by this brain structure. HPC memory can, like other forms of memory, be divided into four processes: encoding, storage, consolidation and retrieval. We argue that synaptic plasticity is critical for the encoding and intermediate storage of memory traces that are automatically recorded in the hippocampus. These traces decay, but are sometimes retained by a process of cellular consolidation. However, we also argue that HPC synaptic plasticity is not involved in memory retrieval, and is unlikely to be involved in systems-level consolidation that depends on HPC-neocortical interactions, although neocortical synaptic plasticity does play a part. The information that has emerged from the worldwide focus on the mechanisms of induction and expression of plasticity at individual synapses has been very valuable in functional studies. Progress towards a comprehensive understanding of memory processing will also depend on the analysis of these synaptic changes within the context of a wider range of systems-level and cellular mechanisms of neuronal transmission and plasticity.     

Brain plasticity and ion channels

It is generally believed that spatio-temporal configurations of distributed activity in the brain contribute to the coding of neuronal information and that synaptic contacts between nerve cells could play a central role in the formation of privileged pathways of activity. Synaptic plasticity is not the only mode of regulation of information processing in the brain and persistent regulations of ionic conductances in some specialized neuronal areas such as the dendrites, the cell body and the axon could also modulate, in the short- and the long-term, the propagation of information in the brain. Persistent changes in intrinsic excitability have been reported in several brain areas in which activity is modified during a classical conditioning. The role of synaptic activity seems to be determinant in the induction but the learning rules and the underlying mechanisms remain to be defined. This review discusses the role of neuronal activity in the induction of intrinsic plasticity in cortical, hippocampal and cerebellar neurons. Activation and inactivation properties of ionic channels in the axon determine the short-term dynamics of axonal propagation and synaptic transmission. Activation of glutamate receptors initiates a long-term modification in neuronal excitability that may represent the substrate for the mnesic engram and for the stabilization of the epileptic state. Similarly to synaptic plasticity, long-lasting intrinsic plasticity appears to be reversible and to express a certain level of input or cellular specificity. These non-synaptic forms of plasticity affect the signal propagation in the axon, the dendrites and the soma. They not only share common learning rules and induction pathways with the better known synaptic plasticity such as NMDA receptor-dependent LTP and LTD but also contribute in synergy with these synaptic changes to the formation of a coherent mnesic engram.     

Cellular and molecular mechanisms of memory

There has been nearly a century of interest in the idea that information is encoded in the brain as specific spatio-temporal patterns of activity in distributed networks and stored as changes in the efficacy of synaptic connections on neurons that are activated during learning. The discovery and detailed report of the phenomenon generally known as long-term potentiation opened a new chapter in the study of synaptic plasticity in the vertebrate brain, and this form of synaptic plasticity has now become the dominant model in the search for the cellular bases of learning and memory. To date, the key events in the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying synaptic plasticity are starting to be identified. They require the activation of specific receptors and of several molecular cascades to convert extracellular signals into persistent functional changes in neuronal connectivity. Accumulating evidence suggests that the rapid activation of the genetic machinery is a key mechanism underlying the enduring modification of neural networks required for the laying down of memory. The recent developments in the search for the cellular and molecular mechanisms of memory storage are reviewed.