Simple approach to harvest of the anterolateral thigh flap

The free anterolateral thigh flap has proven to be invaluable for many types of reconstruction, ranging from upper and lower extremity trauma to head and neck reconstruction. There exist some controversies relating to certain difficulties in flap harvest because of the intramuscular route of its major perforator, which can exceed 80 percent and create a longer, more tedious dissection. Strategies to expedite flap harvest and minimize technical challenges have been proposed. The authors propose a simplified approach to harvest the anterolateral thigh flap founded on topographic surface anatomy and the intrinsic vascular anatomy of the flap. No Doppler imaging or angiography is used for preoperative perforator mapping.     

Anterolateral thigh flap for postmastectomy breast reconstruction

Most postmastectomy defects are reconstructed by use of lower abdominal-wall tissue either as a pedicled or free flap. However, there are some contraindications for using lower abdominal flaps in breast reconstruction, such as inadequate soft-tissue volume, previous abdominoplasty, lower paramedian or multiple abdominal scars, and plans for future pregnancy. In such situations, a gluteal flap has often been the second choice. However, the quality of the adipose tissue of gluteal flaps is inferior to that of lower abdominal flaps, the pedicle is short, and a two-team approach is not possible because creation of the gluteal flap requires that the patient's position be changed during the operation. In 2000, five cases of breast reconstructions were performed with anterolateral thigh flaps in the authors' institution. Two of them were secondary and three were immediate unilateral breast reconstructions. The mean weight of the specimen removed was 350 g in the three patients who underwent immediate reconstruction, and the mean weight of the entire anterolateral thigh flap was 410 g. Skin islands ranged in size from 4 x 8 cm to 7 x 22 cm, with the underlying fat pad ranging in size from 10 x 12 cm to 14 x 22 cm. The mean pedicle length was 11 cm (range, 7 to 15 cm). All flaps were completely successful, except for one that involved some fat necrosis. The quality of the skin and underlying fat and the pliability of the anterolateral thigh flap are much superior to those of gluteal flaps and are similar to those of lower abdominal flaps. In thin patients, more subcutaneous fat can be harvested by extending the flap under the skin. Use of a thigh flap allows a two-team approach with the patient in a supine position, and no change of patient position is required during the operation. However, the position of the scar may not be acceptable to some patients. Therefore, when an abdominal flap is unavailable or contraindicated, the creation of an anterolateral thigh flap for primary and secondary breast reconstruction is an alternative to the use of lower abdominal and gluteal tissues.     

The innervated anterolateral thigh flap: anatomical study and clinical implications

During the past 20 years, the neural anatomy of many flaps has been investigated, although no extensive studies have been reported yet on the anterolateral thigh flap. The goal of this study was to describe the sensory territories of the nerves supplying the anterolateral thigh flap with dissections on fresh cadavers and with local anesthetic injections in living subjects. The sensate anterolateral thigh flap is typically described as innervated by the lateral cutaneous femoral nerve. Two other well-known nerves, the superior perforator nerve and the median perforator nerve, which enter the flap at its medial border, might have a role in anterolateral thigh flap innervation. Twenty-nine anterolateral thigh flaps were elevated in 15 cadavers, and the lateral cutaneous femoral nerve, the superior perforator nerve, and median perforator nerve were dissected. In the injection study, the lateral cutaneous femoral nerve, superior perforator nerve, and median perforator nerve in 16 thighs of eight subjects were sequentially blocked. The resulting sensory deficit from each injection was mapped on the skin and superimposed on the marked anterolateral thigh flap territory. The study shows that the sensate anterolateral thigh flap is basically innervated by all three nerves. The lateral cutaneous femoral nerve was present in 29 of 29 thighs, whereas the superior perforator nerve was present in 25 of 29 and the median perforator nerve in 24 of 29 thighs. Furthermore, in the proximal half of the flap, the lateral cutaneous femoral nerve lies deep, whereas the superior perforator nerve and median perforator nerve lie more superficially. Whereas the lateral cutaneous femoral nerve innervates the entire flap, the superior perforator nerve innervates 25 percent of the flap and the median perforator nerve innervates 60 percent of the flap. Clinically, a small anterolateral thigh flap (7 x 5 cm) can be raised sparing the lateral cutaneous femoral nerve and using only the selective areas innervated by the superior perforator and median perforator nerves. Alternatively, a large anterolateral thigh flap can be raised with this multiple innervation. This can be helpful if one wants to harvest the flap under local anesthesia. Sensate bilobed flaps can be harvested when dual innervated flaps are required.     

Anterolateral thigh flap for abdominal wall reconstruction

The free or pedicled anterolateral thigh flap was introduced for the reconstruction of large abdominal wall defects. This flap is superior to the tensor fasciae latae musculocutaneous flap in several respects. These include the wide, reliable skin territory (which can reach the level of the knee) and the long pedicle. Therefore, a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap with reliable blood circulation can easily be positioned above the umbilicus. In addition, the free anterolateral thigh flap has greater freedom of orientation and can be used to repair larger abdominal wall defects than can the tensor fasciae latae flap. Seven patients in whom abdominal wall defects had been reconstructed with pedicled or free anterolateral thigh flaps were reviewed. Their average age was 47.1 years (range, 21 to 74 years), and the average follow-up period was 10.7 months (range, 2 to 21 months). The size of the abdominal wall defects ranged from 12 x 12 cm to 18 x 24 cm, and the size of the transferred flap ranged from 10 x 20 cm to 20 x 20 cm. Three flaps were pedicled and four were free, of which three incorporated the tensor fasciae latae flap. All flaps survived completely, and no postoperative abdominal hernias developed. Despite some variations in vascular anatomy and technical difficulties in elevating the anterolateral thigh flap, the authors conclude that the pedicled or free anterolateral thigh flap is superior to the tensor fasciae latae flap for reconstruction of large abdominal wall defects.     

Three-dimensional reconstruction of the oral cavity using the free anterolateral thigh flap.

Oral cavity reconstruction after removal of locally advanced tumors is particularly difficult because anatomical restoration must accurately reproduce the original structure and enable effective and fast rehabilitation of mastication, swallowing, and phonation. The authors report their 2-year experience with 17 patients surgically treated for oral cavity cancer with reconstruction performed with the free anterolateral thigh flap. Thanks to its thinness and pliability, this flap has proven to be perfectly adaptable to the structural peculiarities of the resected areas and has enabled the authors to considerably reduce the cosmetic and functional complications in the donor area observed with other flaps (such as the radial forearm flap). Flap grafting has always been complete and regular, and no intraoperative and postoperative complications have been observed. Swallowing recovery has always been satisfactory. On the basis of the authors' results, their current approach to oral cavity reconstruction is based on the use of flaps that enable anatomical restoration of the resected areas and reduce morbidity of the donor site. They believe that the anterolateral thigh flap can offer all of these opportunities, and the surgery can be simultaneously performed by two surgical teams.     

Combined anterolateral thigh flap and vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap in reconstruction of extensive composite mandibular defects.

Extensive composite defects of the oromandibular area are usually created after the surgical treatment of T3 and T4 cancers, requiring complex reconstructive plastic surgical procedures. The preferred treatment method for this type of defect is reconstruction with two free flaps. The use of the vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap for the bone and inner lining defect is well known and accepted. Among the flaps that can be used for the outer lining and soft-tissue reconstruction, the two most commonly used have been the forearm flap and the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. However, these flaps have some disadvantages that restrict their use for this purpose. The forearm flap is usually too thin to cover the fibular bone and reconstruction plate, and the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap can cause a subclinical reduction in abdominal strength. Both radial forearm and rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps are difficult to harvest during tumor excision. Because of these drawbacks, over the past several years the authors have preferred to use the anterolateral thigh flap for outer face, neck, and submandibular region reconstructions. From October of 1998 to June of 2000, 22 extensive composite mandibular defect reconstructions using the free anterolateral thigh flap, combined with the vascularized free fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap, were performed at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Complete flap survival was 90.9 percent (40 of 44 flaps). Complete loss was seen in an anterolateral thigh flap, which was then reconstructed with a pectoralis major myocutaneous pedicled flap (2.3 percent). There were five venous problems: three in osteoseptocutaneous free fibula flaps, the other two in anterolateral thigh flaps; all were revised immediately. However, the skin islands of two osteoseptocutaneous free fibula flaps and one anterolateral thigh flap developed partial necrosis (6.8 percent). The other complications were compartment syndrome in the leg in one patient, external carotid artery rupture in one patient, three donor-site infections in two patients, three neck wound infections, and one myocardial insufficiency; all were treated properly. Thirteen patients underwent revision procedures 6 months after the first operation. These procedures included debulking of the flap or revision of the mouth angle or both. Trismus or intraoral contraction was noted in none of these patients. In conclusion, the free anterolateral thigh flap combined with the vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap seems to be a good choice in the reconstruction of the extensive composite defects of the oromandibular region aesthetically and functionally.     

Comparison of the radial forearm flap and the thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap for reconstruction of tongue defects: an evaluation of donor-site morbidity

The radial forearm flap is commonly used for reconstruction of tongue defects following tumor extirpation. This flap is easy to harvest and offers thin tissue with large-caliber vessels. However, its use leaves behind a conspicuous aesthetic deformity in the forearm and requires the sacrifice of a major artery of that limb, the radial artery. The anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap has found clinical applications in the reconstruction of soft-tissue defects requiring thin tissue. More recently, in a thinned form, the anterolateral thigh flap has been used for reconstructing defects of the tongue with functional results equivalent to that of the radial forearm flap. For the reconstruction of tongue defects, these two flaps could provide similar soft-tissue coverage, but they seem to result in different donor-site appearances. The donor site is closed primarily, leaving only a linear scar that is inconspicuous with normal clothing, and no functional deficit is left behind in the thigh. Thus, for the supply of flaps for tongue defects, a comparison between the radial forearm flap and the anterolateral thigh flap donor sites is provided in this study. Between December of 2000 and August of 2002, 41 patients who underwent reconstruction of defects of the tongue using either a radial forearm flap or an anterolateral thigh flap were evaluated. The focus was on the evaluation of the functional and aesthetic outcome of the donor site after harvesting these flaps for the purpose of reconstructing either total or partial tongue defects. Finally, a comparison was performed between the donor sites of the two flaps. The disadvantages of the radial forearm flap include the conspicuous unattractive scar in the forearm region, pain, numbness, and the sacrifice of a major artery of the limb. In some patients, the donor-site scar of the forearm acted as a social stigma, preventing these patients from leading a normal life. In contrast, the anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap, after thinning, achieved the same results in reconstructing defects of the tongue without the associated donor-site morbidity. Most importantly, the donor site in the thigh could be closed primarily in almost all patients without any functional deficit. The thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap is a viable substitute for the radial forearm flap when reconstructing defects of the tongue. The results achieved are similar to those of the radial forearm flap, and the donor-site morbidity is significantly decreased.     

Free anterolateral thigh adipofascial perforator flap

The anterolateral thigh adipofascial flap is a vascularized flap prepared from the adipofascial layer of the anterolateral thigh region. It is a perforator flap based on septocutaneous or musculocutaneous perforators of the lateral circumflex femoral system. With methods similar to those used for the free anterolateral thigh flap, only the deep fascia of the anterolateral thigh and a 2-mm-thick to 3-mm-thick layer of subcutaneous fatty tissue above the fascia were harvested. In 11 cases, this flap (length, 5 to 11 cm; width, 4 to 8 cm) was used for successful reconstruction of extremity defects. Split-thickness skin grafts were used to immediately resurface the adipofascial flaps for eight patients, and delayed skin grafting was performed for the other three patients. The advantage of the anterolateral thigh adipofascial flap is its ability to provide vascularized, thin, pliable, gliding coverage. In addition, the donor-site defect can be closed directly. Other advantages of this flap, such as safe elevation, a long wide vascular pedicle, a large flap territory, and flow-through properties that allow simultaneous reconstruction of major-vessel and soft-tissue defects, are the same as for the conventional anterolateral thigh flap. The main disadvantage of this procedure is the need for a skin graft, with the possible complications of subsequent skin graft loss or hyperpigmentation.     

Applied anatomy of the anterolateral femoral flap

A study of the source of the blood supply to the anterolateral femoral flap was carried out on 42 lower limbs of adult cadavers (among them 35 cadavers with injection of red latex and 1 with india ink into the arteries and 6 vascular cast specimens), and the surface locations of the vascular pedicle were detected on 50 healthy adults. It was found that the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral vessel was an ideal axial vessel. There are constant perforating branches of the myocutaneous artery or cutaneous branches from the intermuscular space to the anterolateral femoral skin. The area extends about 12 x 30 cm. Within the flap, the anterior branch of the anterolateral cutaneous nerve of the high is located. This flap has been widely used for free transplantation in China since 1983 with satisfactory results.     

Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps

The free anterolateral thigh flap is becoming one of the most preferred options for soft-tissue reconstruction. Between June of 1996 and August of 2000, 672 anterolateral thigh flaps were used in 660 patients at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Four hundred eighty-four anterolateral thigh flaps were used for head and neck region recontruction in 475 patients, 58 flaps were used for upper extremity reconstruction in 58 patients, 121 flaps were used for lower extremity reconstruction in 119 patients, and nine flaps were used for trunk reconstruction in nine patients. Of the 672 flaps used in total, a majority (439) were musculocutaneous perforator flaps. Sixty-five were septocutaneous vessel flaps. Of these 504 flaps, 350 were fasciocutaneous and 154 were cutaneous flaps. Of the remaining 168 flaps, 95 were musculocutaneous flaps, 63 were chimeric flaps, and the remaining ten were composite musculocutaneous perforator flaps with the tensor fasciae latae. Total flap failure occurred in 12 patients (1.79 percent of the flaps) and partial failure occurred in 17 patients (2.53 percent of the flaps). Of the 12 flaps that failed completely, five were reconstructed with second anterolateral thigh flaps, four with pedicled flaps, one with a free radial forearm flap, one with skin grafting, and one with primary closure. Of the 17 flaps that failed partially, three were reconstructed with anterolateral thigh flaps, one with a free radial forearm flap, five with pedicled flaps, and eight with primary suture, skin grafting, and conservative methods.In this large series, a consistent anatomy of the main pedicle of the anterolateral thigh flap was observed. In cutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps, the skin vessels (musculocutaneous perforators or septocutaneous vessels) were found and followed until they reached the main pedicle, regardless of the anatomic position. There were only six cases in this series in which no skin vessels were identified during the harvesting of cutaneous or fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh flaps. In 87.1 percent of the cutaneous or fasciocutaneous flaps, the skin vessels were found to be musculocutaneous perforators; in 12.9 percent, they were found as septocutaneous vessels. The anterolateral thigh flap is a reliable flap that supplies a large area of skin. This flap can be harvested irrespective of whether the skin vessels are septocutaneous or musculocutaneous. It is a versatile soft-tissue flap in which thickness and volume can be adjusted for the extent of the defect, and it can replace most soft-tissue free flaps in most clinical situations.     

Distally based anterolateral thigh flap: an anatomic and clinical study

The distally based anterolateral thigh flap has been used for coverage of soft-tissue defects of the knee and upper third of the leg. This flap is based on the septocutaneous or musculocutaneous perforators derived from the lateral circumflex femoral system. The purpose of this study was to examine the results of anatomical variations of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery and the retrograde blood pressure of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery so that the surgical technique for raising and transferring a distally based anterolateral thigh flap to the knee region could be improved. The authors have actually used this flap in three cases. In 11 thighs of six cadavers, the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery had a rather consistent connection with the lateral superior genicular artery or profunda femoral artery in the knee region. The pivot point, located at the distal portion of the vastus lateralis muscle, ranges from 3 to 10 cm above the knee. In their three cases, the maximal flap size was 7.0 x 16.0 cm and was harvested safely, without marginal necrosis. The mean pedicle length was 15.2 +/- 0.7 cm (range, 14.5 to 16 cm). The average proximal and distal retrograde blood pressure of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery was also studied in another 11 patients, and the anterolateral thigh flap being used for reconstruction of head and neck defects showed 58.3 and 77.7 percent of proximal antegrade blood pressure, respectively. The advantages of this flap include a long pedicle length, a sufficient tissue supply, possible combination with fascia lata for tendon reconstruction, and favorable donor-site selection, without sacrifice of major vessels or muscles.     

Anterolateral thigh flap in the treatment of postburn flexion contractures of the knee

The use of the anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flap in the reconstruction of soft-tissue defects around the knee among burn patients is described. The anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flap was used for eight patients (all male; mean age, 45 years; age range, 32 to 60 years). Flexion contracture was observed for seven patients with unhealed wounds and one patient with a healed burn wound. The anterolateral thigh flap was used as a free flap for six patients and as a distally based island flap for two patients. The flaps ranged from 8 to 17 cm in width and from 12 to 30 cm in length. Seven flaps were based on a musculocutaneous perforator, and two of them were thinned before transfer to the defect. A true septocutaneous perforator was observed in only one case. The mean follow-up period was 12.5 months (range, 3 to 23 months). Only one flap exhibited distal superficial necrosis, which did not compromise the final result. All patients returned to ambulatory status in 15 to 22 days. Extensor splints were applied to prevent mobilization of the skin graft at the flap donor site for only 7 days. The anterolateral thigh flap has many advantages for the reconstruction of postburn flexion contracture of the knee, as follows: (1) very large thin flaps can be elevated, (2) the two-team approach is possible, (3) color and texture matches are good, (4) the donor-site scar can be easily hidden, and (5) the technique allows early mobilization and patients can return to normal daily activity in a short time. Free or distally based anterolateral thigh flaps are a good choice, both aesthetically and functionally, for the reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of the knee region.     

Technique and strategy in anterolateral thigh perforator flap surgery,based on an analysis of 15 complete and partial failures in 439 cases

The free anterolateral thigh flap is becoming one of the most preferred options for soft-tissue defect reconstruction. Between June of 1996 and August of 2000, 672 anterolateral thigh flaps were used in 660 patients in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. A total of 439 flaps were cutaneous or fasciocutaneous flaps based on musculocutaneous perforators. The analysis of the flap failures was done only in this perforator series. In six cases, no suitable skin vessel was found during the dissection of the flaps. The complete success rate was 96.58 percent (424 of 439). Of the 15 failure cases, eight were complete and seven were partial (10 percent to 60 percent of the flap). Thirty-four flaps were reexplored, and 19 (56 percent) were salvaged. In this study, some of the reasons for the flap failure, unique to the anterolateral thigh perforator flap, were identified. They include inadvertent division of perforator at the fascial plane as a result of inadequate knowledge of perforator anatomy, inadvertent injury to the perforator during intramuscular dissection (noted by the surgeon or ignored) as a result of inexperience, and twisting of the pedicle during inset of the flap at the recipient site. Technical pearls in the harvest of the anterolateral thigh perforator flap are as follows: mapping of the skin vessels with a Doppler probe before flap design, meticulous dissection of the perforator under surgical loupe or even lower-magnification microscope, inclusion of a small fascia cuff around the perforator, and intermittent topical use of Xylocaine during the intramuscular dissection of the perforators. During reexploration, one must search for twisting of the pedicle and small bleeders from the branches of the intramuscular perforators.     

Clinical application of the free thin anterolateral thigh flap in 31 consecutive patients

In this retrospective study, 31 reconstructions using thin anterolateral thigh flaps and six cadaveric dissections of the thigh were investigated in consideration of the anatomic variations of the perforator vessels in the adipose layer, the safe area of flap circulation, and the clinical indications.Three variations of the perforator vessel course in the adipose layer were predicted correctly. The safe radius of a thin anterolateral thigh flap with a thickness of 3 to 4 mm was determined to be approximately 9 cm from the point where the perforator met the skin. The use of a thin anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of the neck, axilla, anterior tibial area, dorsum of the foot, circumference on the ankle, forearm, and dorsum of the hand was therefore recommended.     

Preoperative color Doppler assessment in planning of anterolateral thigh flaps

The anterolateral thigh flap has many advantages, but it has not yet achieved widespread use because the perforators exhibit considerable anatomical variation and their locations are difficult to predict preoperatively. The authors performed a prospective study to investigate whether acoustic Doppler flowmetry and color Doppler ultrasonography were helpful for preoperative localization of the perforators in anterolateral thigh flaps. Ten patients scheduled for anterolateral thigh flap surgery were examined preoperatively with both acoustic Doppler flowmetry and color Doppler ultrasonography, and all points where the perforators seemed to penetrate the fascia lata were mapped. The actual perforating points were identified intraoperatively and were compared with the preoperatively mapped points. Fifteen perforators were detected in 10 patients. The concordance rate with acoustic Doppler flowmetry was 40 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 15 to 68 percent; p = 0.05). In contrast, the concordance rate with color Doppler ultrasonography was 100 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 81 to 100 percent; p = 0.05). Color Doppler examination was significantly more accurate than acoustic Doppler examination (determined by the binomial test; p < 0.0014). Three-dimensional anatomical information around the perforators was further useful in elevating flaps. The authors conclude that color Doppler examination can accurately identify the perforators and is useful for planning in anterolateral thigh flap surgery, whereas acoustic Doppler examination is unreliable.     

Vascular anatomy of the anterolateral thigh flap

Arterial and venous anatomy and their relation to the anterolateral thigh flap were examined in 10 specimens of six fresh cadavers in which radiopaque materials were injected into both the arterial and venous systems. Territories and positions of individual perforating arteries were measured, and the venous drainage pathway of the flap was analyzed. All specimens were radiographed stereoscopically to observe the three-dimensional structure of the arteries and veins. The territory of each perforating artery was smaller than expected. Most of the venous blood that had perfused the dermis was considered to pool in a polygonal venous network located in the skin layer and to enter the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery through large descending veins. The venous territories were considered different from the arterial territories. The findings in this study suggest that the design of the anterolateral thigh flap should be based on the venous architecture rather than on the arterial architecture and that the flap survival rate might be improved if thinning is performed appropriately.     

Facial contour restoration in Barraquer-Simons syndrome using two free anterolateral thigh flaps

Barraquer-Simons syndrome, or cephalothoracic lipodystrophy, is characterized by fat atrophy of an obscure pathogenesis involving the face and, eventually, the thoracic region. Simultaneously, fat hypertrophy of the lower extremities, a nephropathy, and complement anomalies may be observed. We presented two patients with the typical features of this disease, as well as a previously undescribed vascular and perivascular inflammation of the facial arteries and veins that caused problems with microvascular anastomosis. Both patients were treated with a bilateral transfer of the anterolateral thigh flap, which has not been reported previously. In contrast to other transfers previously reported, the fat tissue of this flap is never affected by the disease and is redundantly present. Placing the fascia of the flaps toward the skin allows for strong fixation to the temporal region and guarantees a stable result with a smooth facial contour.     

A new surgical procedure for phallic reconstruction: Istanbul flap

A new surgical procedure is described for phallic reconstruction, which still remains a great challenge in reconstructive surgery. In this procedure, an osteocutaneous radial forearm flap is combined with a radial recurrent fasciocutaneous flap from the anterolateral aspect of the upper arm. While keeping a fasciovascular connection between them, both flaps are elevated as a combined free flap based on the radial artery. The forearm skin island is used solely to construct the outer skin cover of the phallic shaft, and the neourethra is created by using the radial recurrent flap. Over the past 4 years, this surgical procedure, termed the Istanbul flap, has been used successfully for complete phallic reconstruction in five patients. Although more clinical experience with this new technique is needed, it seems to be a useful alternative in phallic reconstruction. It remarkably minimizes the donor-site scar without sacrificing the length of the neopenis. In addition, this technique reduces the risk of a hairy urethra.     

Multipaddled Anterolateral Thigh Chimeric Flap for Reconstruction of Complex Defects in Head and Neck

The anterolateral thigh flap has been the workhouse flap for coverage of soft-tissue defects in head and neck for decades. However, the reconstruction of multiple and complex soft-tissue defects in head and neck with multipaddled anterolateral thigh chimeric flaps is still a challenge for reconstructive surgeries. Here, a clinical series of 12 cases is reported in which multipaddled anterolateral thigh chimeric flaps were used for complex soft-tissue defects with several separately anatomic locations in head and neck. Of the 12 cases, 7 patients presented with trismus were diagnosed as advanced buccal cancer with oral submucous fibrosis, 2 tongue cancer cases were found accompanied with multiple oral mucosa lesions or buccal cancer, and 3 were hypopharyngeal cancer with anterior neck skin invaded. All soft-tissue defects were reconstructed by multipaddled anterolateral thigh chimeric flaps, including 9 tripaddled anterolateral thigh flaps and 3 bipaddled flaps. The mean length of skin paddle was 19.2 (range: 14–23) cm and the mean width was 4.9 (range: 2.5–7) cm. All flaps survived and all donor sites were closed primarily. After a mean follow-up time of 9.1 months, there were no problems with the donor or recipient sites. This study supports that the multipaddled anterolateral thigh chimeric flap is a reliable and good alternative for complex and multiple soft-tissue defects of the head and neck.     

The lateral intercostal neurovascular free flap

The lateral intercostal flap is a new neurovascular flap that may be used as a free or island flap. It is based on the lateral cutaneous branch of a single posterior intercostal neurovascular bundle. The donor area of the flap is the anterolateral skin of the abdomen. The flap is large, thin, and has a long pedicle that contains the lateral cutaneous nerve. The donor pedicles of the flap are multiple, and its venous drainage is adequate. The detection and design of this flap were based on information gained from the dissection of 95 intercostal spaces in 40 fresh cadavers. The flap was then applied 12 times in 11 patients. Ten flaps were successful, one flap was partially lost, and one was completely lost. The flap was used as a noninnervated flap to resurface six defects in the neck and one facial defect, and it was used as an innervated flap to cover two hand defects and two heel defects.