Spatial distribution patterns of interphase centromeres during retinoic acid-induced differentiation of promyelocytic leukemia cells

BACKGROUND: The pericentromeric heterochromatin is an important element for the regulation of gene silencing. Its spatial distribution during interphase appears to be cell-type specific. This study analyzes three-dimensional (3D) centromere distribution patterns during cellular differentiation along the neutrophil pathway. METHODS: Differentiation of the promyelocytic leukemia cell line NB4 was induced by retinoic acid. Centromeres in interphase nuclei were visualized by immunofluorescence staining of centromere-associated proteins with CREST serum. 3D images of nuclei were obtained by confocal microscopy. Automated methods for the segmentation of point-like objects in 3D images were implemented to detect the position of centromeres. Features of centromere localization patterns were determined by constructing the minimal spanning tree of the centromere distribution. RESULTS: In differentiated NB4 cells, the number of centromere conglomerates (chromocenters) was decreased and the distance between chromocenters was increased as compared with untreated controls. The nuclear volume did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The measured rearrangement of centromeres indicates a progressive clustering of heterochromatin and a global remodeling of interphase chromosome territories during differentiation of NB4 cells. The developed methods for the analysis of 3D centromere distribution patterns provide the opportunity for a fast and objective analysis of heterochromatin remodeling.     

Cultivation and Differentiation Change Nuclear Localization of Chromosome Centromeres in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Chromosome arrangement in the interphase nucleus is not accidental. Strong evidences support that nuclear localization is an important mechanism of epigenetic regulation of gene expression. The purpose of this research was to identify differences in the localization of centromeres of chromosomes 6, 12, 18 and X in human mesenchymal stem cells depending on differentiation and cultivating time. We analyzed centromere positions in more than 4000 nuclei in 19 mesenchymal stem cell cultures before and after prolonged cultivation and after differentiation into osteogenic and adipogenic directions. We found a centromere reposition of HSAX at late passages and after differentiation in osteogenic direction as well as of HSA12 and HSA18 after adipogenic differentiation. The observed changes of the nuclear structure are new nuclear characteristics of the studied cells which may reflect regulatory changes of gene expression during the studied processes.     

Centromere pattern in different mouse seminiferous tubule cells

Centromere arrangement in different mouse seminiferous tubule cells was analyzed using an anticentromere antiserum from a patient with the CREST syndrome of scleroderma. A peptide of 18 kd was recognized by this serum on immunoblotting of mouse nuclear proteins from seminiferous tubule cells. In the cells studied by immunofluorescence, different patterns of centromere arrangement were observed. A speckled arrangement of centromeres was found in spermatogonia, double spots corresponding to meiotic bivalents were found in pachytene cells, and clusters of a haploid numer of centromeres were found in early and acrosome phase spermatids. In Sertoli cells, only three centromeric spots were detected, corresponding to the nucleolar organizer chromosome pairs. A relationship between the functional stage of the cell and the arrangement of and conformational changes in the centromeres is considered.     

Dissociation of the Nuf2-Ndc80 complex releases centromeres from the spindle-pole body during meiotic prophase in fission yeast

In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, centromeres remain clustered at the spindle-pole body (SPB) during mitotic interphase. In contrast, during meiotic prophase centromeres dissociate from the SPB. Here we examined the behavior of centromere proteins in living meiotic cells of S. pombe. We show that the Nuf2-Ndc80 complex proteins (Nuf2, Ndc80, Spc24, and Spc25) disappear from the centromere in meiotic prophase when the centromeres are separated from the SPB. The centromere protein Mis12 also dissociates during meiotic prophase; however, Mis6 remains throughout meiosis. When cells are induced to meiosis by inactivation of Pat1 kinase (a key negative regulator of meiosis), centromeres remain associated with the SPB during meiotic prophase. However, inactivation of Nuf2 by a mutation causes the release of centromeres from the SPB in pat1 mutant cells, suggesting that the Nuf2-Ndc80 complex connects centromeres to the SPB. We further found that removal of the Nuf2-Ndc80 complex from the centromere and centromere-SPB dissociation are caused by mating pheromone signaling. Because pat1 mutant cells also show aberrant chromosome segregation in the first meiotic division and this aberration is compensated by mating pheromone signaling, dissociation of the Nuf2-Ndc80 complex may be associated with remodeling of the kinetochore for meiotic chromosome segregation.     

Csi1 links centromeres to the nuclear envelope for centromere clustering

In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the centromeres of each chromosome are clustered together and attached to the nuclear envelope near the site of the spindle pole body during interphase. The mechanism and functional importance of this arrangement of chromosomes are poorly understood. In this paper, we identified a novel nuclear protein, Csi1, that localized to the site of centromere attachment and interacted with both the inner nuclear envelope SUN domain protein Sad1 and centromeres. Both Csi1 and Sad1 mutants exhibited centromere clustering defects in a high percentage of cells. Csi1 mutants also displayed a high rate of chromosome loss during mitosis, significant mitotic delays, and sensitivity to perturbations in microtubule–kinetochore interactions and chromosome numbers. These studies thus define a molecular link between the centromere and nuclear envelope that is responsible for centromere clustering.     

The spatial organization of centromeric heterochromatin during normal human lymphopoiesis: evidence for ontogenically determined spatial patterns

It is believed that pericentromeric heterochromatin may play a major role in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. We have previously shown that centromeres in human peripheral blood cells aggregate into distinct "myeloid" and "lymphoid" spatial patterns, suggesting that the three-dimensional organization of centromeric heterochromatin in interphase may be ontogenically determined during hematopoietic differentiation. To investigate this possibility, the spatial patterns of association of different centromeres were analyzed in hematopoietic progenitors and compared with those in early-B and early-T cells, mature B and T lymphocytes, and, additionally, mature granulocytes and monocytes. We show that those patterns change during lymphoid differentiation, with major spatial arrangements taking place at different stages during T and B cell differentiation. Heritable patterns of centromere association are observed, which can occur either at the level of the common lymphoid progenitor, or in early-T or early-B committed cells. A correlation of the observed patterns of centromere association with the gene content of the respective chromosomes further suggests that the variation in the composition of these heterochromatic structures may contribute to the dynamic relocation of genes in different nuclear compartments during cell differentiation, which might have functional implications for cell-stage-specific gene expression.     

The mouse pubic symphysis as a remodeling system: morphometrical analysis of proliferation and cell death during pregnancy, partus and postpartum

Marked changes in mice pubic symphysis occur by the end of pregnancy. Tissue remodeling involves a dynamic balance between cell proliferation and programmed cell death as well as changes in the extracellular matrix components. Therefore, it is important to consider both of these cellular behaviors when investigating the mechanism that regulates interpubic tissue remodeling, growth during late pregnancy and partus ensuring involution during the postpartum period. Proliferating and programmed death cells were identified by immunohistochemistry (proliferating cell nuclear antigen and TUNEL detection, respectively) and the rates at which these processes occurred were determined by morphometric analysis. The results demonstrated that cellular proliferation was intense during the period of ligament formation, from D15 to D18, thereafter abruptly declining on D19. From parturition (D19) onwards, an ever-increasing decline in the cellular proliferation levels could be observed. The quantitative analyses of cellular death showed opposite results when compared to cellular proliferation. During early pregnancy the cycle of cellular renovation was clearly proliferative and during late mouse pregnancy the cycle was directed by programmed cellular death. Although the high levels of cellular death during postpartum involution could be shown by the TUNEL-positive cells, we were unable to observed picnotic nucleus at the light microscopy.     

Stable Patterns of CENH3 Occupancy Through Maize Lineages Containing Genetically Similar Centromeres

While the approximate chromosomal position of centromeres has been identified in many species, little is known about the dynamics and diversity of centromere positions within species. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that DNA sequence has little or no impact in specifying centromeres in maize and in most multicellular organisms. Given that epigenetically defined boundaries are expected to be dynamic, we hypothesized that centromere positions would change rapidly over time, which would result in a diversity of centromere positions in isolated populations. To test this hypothesis, we used CENP-A/cenH3 (CENH3 in maize) chromatin immunoprecipitation to define centromeres in breeding pedigrees that included the B73 inbred as a common parent. While we found a diversity of CENH3 profiles for centromeres with divergent sequences that were not inherited from B73, the CENH3 profiles from centromeres that were inherited from B73 were indistinguishable from each other. We propose that specific genetic elements in centromeric regions favor or inhibit CENH3 accumulation, leading to reproducible patterns of CENH3 occupancy. These data also indicate that dramatic shifts in centromere position normally originate from accumulated or large-scale genetic changes rather than from epigenetic positional drift.     

Centromere mitotic recombination in mammalian cells

Centromeres are special structures of eukaryotic chromosomes that hold sister chromatid together and ensure proper chromosome segregation during cell division. Centromeres consist of repeated sequences, which have hindered the study of centromere mitotic recombination and its consequences for centromeric function. We use a chromosome orientation fluorescence in situ hybridization technique to visualize and quantify recombination events at mouse centromeres. We show that centromere mitotic recombination occurs in normal cells to a higher frequency than telomere recombination and to a much higher frequency than chromosome-arm recombination. Furthermore, we show that centromere mitotic recombination is increased in cells lacking the Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b DNA methyltransferases, suggesting that the epigenetic state of centromeric heterochromatin controls recombination events at these regions. Increased centromere recombination in Dnmt3a,3b-deficient cells is accompanied by changes in the length of centromere repeats, suggesting that prevention of illicit centromere recombination is important to maintain centromere integrity in the mouse.     

Specific radial positions of centromeres of human chromosomes X, 1, and 19 remain unchanged in chromatin-depleted nuclei of primary human fibroblasts: evidence for the organizing role of the nuclear matrix

Radial positions of centromeres of human chromosomes X, 1, and 19 were determined in the nuclei of primary fibroblasts before and after removal of 60%-80% of chromatin. It has been demonstrated that the specific radial positions of these centromeres (more central for the chromosome 19 centromere and more peripheral for the centromeres of chromosomes 1 and X) remain unchanged in chromatin-depleted nuclei. Additional digestion of nuclear RNA did not influence this specific distribution. These results strongly suggest that the characteristic organization of interphase chromosomes is supported by the proteinous nuclear matrix and is not maintained by simple repulsing of negatively charged chromosomes.     

Decondensation of pericentric heterochromatin alters the sequence of centromere separation in mouse cells

The centromeres of a genome separate in a sequential, nonrandom manner that is apparently dependent upon the quantity and quality of pericentric heterochromatin. It is becoming increasingly clear that the biological properties of a centromere depend upon its physicochemical makeup, such as its tertiary structure, and not necessarily on its particular nucleotide sequence. To test this idea we altered the physical state of the AT-rich pericentric heterochromatin of mouse with Hoechst 33258 (bis-benzimidazole) and studied a biological parameter, viz., sequence of separation. We report that an alteration in the physical state of heterochromatin, i.e., decondensation, is accompanied by aberrations in the pattern of centromere separation. The most dramatic effect seems to be on chromosomes with large blocks of heterochromatin. Many chromosomes with large blocks of heterochromatin that, in untreated cells, separate late tend to separate early. Decondensation with Hoechst 33258 does not seem to alter the sequence of separation of inactive centromeres relative to that of active centromeres. These data indicate that alteration in the physical parameters of the pericentric heterochromatin might dispose the centromeres to errors. It is likely that this aberration results from early replication of the pericentric heterochromatin associated with active centromeres. Received: 24 August 1998; in revised form: 24 August 1998 / Accepted: 28 August 1998     

A Taz1- and Microtubule-Dependent Regulatory Relationship between Telomere and Centromere Positions in Bouquet Formation Secures Proper Meiotic Divisions

During meiotic prophase, telomeres cluster, forming the bouquet chromosome arrangement, and facilitate homologous chromosome pairing. In fission yeast, bouquet formation requires switching of telomere and centromere positions. Centromeres are located at the spindle pole body (SPB) during mitotic interphase, and upon entering meiosis, telomeres cluster at the SPB, followed by centromere detachment from the SPB. Telomere clustering depends on the formation of the microtubule-organizing center at telomeres by the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton complex (LINC), while centromere detachment depends on disassembly of kinetochores, which induces meiotic centromere formation. However, how the switching of telomere and centromere positions occurs during bouquet formation is not fully understood. Here, we show that, when impaired telomere interaction with the LINC or microtubule disruption inhibited telomere clustering, kinetochore disassembly-dependent centromere detachment and accompanying meiotic centromere formation were also inhibited. Efficient centromere detachment required telomere clustering-dependent SPB recruitment of a conserved telomere component, Taz1, and microtubules. Furthermore, when artificial SPB recruitment of Taz1 induced centromere detachment in telomere clustering-defective cells, spindle formation was impaired. Thus, detachment of centromeres from the SPB without telomere clustering causes spindle impairment. These findings establish novel regulatory mechanisms, which prevent concurrent detachment of telomeres and centromeres from the SPB during bouquet formation and secure proper meiotic divisions.     

The nuclear position of pericentromeric DNA of chromosome 11 appears to be random in GO and non-random in G1 human lymphocytes

The nuclear topography of pericentromeric DNA of chromosome 11 was analyzed in G₀ (nonstimulated) and G₁ [phytohemagglutinin (PHA) stimulated] human lymphocytes by confocal microscopy. In addition to the nuclear center, the centrosome was used as a second point of reference in the three-dimensional (3D) analysis. Pericentromeric DNA of chromosome 11 and the centrosome were labeled using a combination of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunofluorescence. To preserve the 3D morphology of the cells, these techniques were performed on whole cells in suspension. Three-dimensional images of the cells were analyzed with a recently developed 3D software program (Interactive Measurement of Axes and Positioning in 3 Dimensions). The distribution of the chromosome 11 centromeres appeared to be random during the G₀ stage but clearly non-random during the G₁ stage, when the nuclear center was used as a reference point. Further statistical analysis of the G₁ cells revealed that the centromeres were randomly distributed in a shell underlying the nuclear membrane. A topographical relationship between the centrosome and the centromeres appeared to be absent during the G₀ and G₁ stages of the cell cycle.     

Centromere behavior during interphase and meiotic prophase in Allium fistulosum from 3-D,E.M. reconstruction

Centromeres at premeiotic interphase are clustered and situated in a small area of the nucleus opposite to the nuclear envelope associated heterochromatic masses. The centromeres may occur singly or they may associate to form a structure composed of 2 or more centromeres. Many centromere associations are nonhomologous. Interphase centromeres are not attached to the nuclear envelope. — At zygotene and pachytene centromeres are no longer clustered at one pole of the nucleus but rather are distributed throughout the nucleus. Premeiotic associations appear to be resolved prior to meiotic pairing. Only homologous centromere associations occur during zygotene and pachytene. There is no indication that premeiotic centromere associations are involved in prezygotene alignment of homologous chromosomes.     

DNA and proteins of plant centromeres

In plants, as in all eukaryotes, centromeres are chromatin domains that govern the transmission of nuclear chromosomes to the next generation of cells/individuals. The DNA composition and sequence organization of centromeres has recently been elucidated for a few plant species. Although there is little sequence conservation among centromeres, they usually contain tandem repeats and retroelements. The occurrence of neocentromeres reinforces the idea that the positions of centromeres are determined epigenetically. In contrast to centromeric DNA, structural and transient kinetochoric proteins are highly conserved among eukaryotes. Candidate sequences have been identified for a dozen putative kinetochore protein homologues, and some have been localized to plant centromeres. The kinetochore protein CENH3, which substitutes histone H3 within centromeric nucleosomes, co-immunoprecipitates preferentially with centromeric sequences. The mechanism(s) of centromere assembly and the functional implication of (peri-)centromeric modifications of chromatin remain to be elucidated.     

Immortalization and malignant transformation of Eukaryotic cells

The process of cellular transformation has been amply studied in vitro using immortalized cell lines. Immortalized cells never have the normal diploid karyotype, nevertheless, they cannot grow over one another in cell culture (contact inhibition), do not form colonies in soft agar (anchorage-dependent growth) and do not form tumors when injected into immunodeficient rodents. All these characteristics can be obtained with additional chromosome changes. Multiple genetic rearrangements, including whole chromosome and gene copy number gains and losses, chromosome translocations, gene mutations are necessary for establishing the malignant cell phenotype. Most of the experiments detecting transforming ability of genes overexpressed and/or mutated in tumors (oncogenes) were performed using mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), NIH3T3 mouse fibroblast cell line, human embryonic kidney 293 cell line (HEK293), and human mammary epithelial cell lines (mainly HMECs and MCF10A). These cell lines have abnormal karyotypes and are prone to progress to malignantly transformed cells. This review is aimed at understanding the mechanisms of cell immortalization by different “immortalizing agents”, oncogene-induced cell transformation of immortalized cells and moderate response of the advanced tumors to anticancer therapy in the light of tumor “oncogene and chromosome addiction”, intra-/intertumor heterogeneity, and chromosome instability.     

Human epidermal keratinocytes retain radiation resistance following in vitro immortalization and malignant transformation

The radiobiology of human tumors suggests that multiple factors are involved in clinical radioresponsiveness. To date, no direct experimental evidence is available to correlate intrinsic cellular radiosensitivity with the steps of malignant transformation. We developed an in vitro multistage model of epithelial neoplasia using human epidermal keratinocytes to examine the effects of malignant transformation on radiation response. These cells were first immortalized as a result of infection with a hybrid virus (adenovirus 12 and simian virus 40) and subsequently transformed either by infection with a second virus (Kirsten murine sarcoma virus) or by treatment with a chemical carcinogen (N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine or 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide). We demonstrate that primary human epidermal keratinocytes were radiation resistant (D0 = 2.24 Gy) as compared with human fibroblasts (D0 = 1.45 Gy) and that this resistance was retained in the immortalized as well as the transformed cell lines. These findings present direct experimental evidence that radiation sensitivity of malignant human keratinocytes is an intrinsic property of the precursor cell that may be conserved through the stages of neoplastic transformation.     

Differences in centromere positioning of cycling and postmitotic human cell types

Centromere positioning in human cell nuclei was traced in non-cycling peripheral blood lymphocytes (G0) and in terminally differentiated monocytes, as well as in cycling phytohemagglutinin-stimulated lymphocytes, diploid lymphoblastoid cells, normal fibroblasts, and neuroblastoma SH-EP cells using immunostaining of kinetochores, confocal microscopy and three-dimensional image analysis. Cell cycle stages were identified for each individual cell by a combination of replication labeling with 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine and immunostaining of pKi67. We demonstrate that the behavior of centromeres is similar in all cell types studied: a large fraction of centromeres are in the nuclear interior during early G1; in late G1 and early S phase, centromeres shift to the nuclear periphery and fuse in clusters. Peripheral location and clustering of centromeres are most pronounced in non-cycling cells (G0) and terminally differentiated monocytes. In late S and G2, centromeres partially decluster and migrate towards the nuclear interior. In the rather flat nuclei of adherently growing fibroblasts and neuroblastoma cells, kinetochores showed asymmetrical distributions with preferential kinetochore location close either to the bottom side of the nucleus (adjacent to the growth surface) or to the nuclear upper side. This asymmetrical distribution of centromeres is considered to be a consequence of chromosome arrangement in anaphase rosettes.     

Strong nucleosomes of mouse genome including recovered centromeric sequences

Recently discovered strong nucleosomes (SNs) characterized by visibly periodical DNA sequences have been found to concentrate in centromeres of Arabidopsis thaliana and in transient meiotic centromeres of Caenorhabditis elegans. To find out whether such affiliation of SNs to centromeres is a more general phenomenon, we studied SNs of the Mus musculus. The publicly available genome sequences of mouse, as well as of practically all other eukaryotes do not include the centromere regions which are difficult to assemble because of a large amount of repeat sequences in the centromeres and pericentromeric regions. We recovered those missing sequences using the data from MNase-seq experiments in mouse embryonic stem cells, where the sequence of DNA inside nucleosomes, including missing regions, was determined by 100-bp paired-end sequencing. Those nucleosome sequences, which are not matching to the published genome sequence, would largely belong to the centromeres. By evaluating SN densities in centromeres and in non-centromeric regions, we conclude that mouse SNs concentrate in the centromeres of telocentric mouse chromosomes, with ~3.9 times excess compared to their density in the rest of the genome. The remaining non-centromeric SNs are harbored mainly by introns and intergenic regions, by retro-transposons, in particular. The centromeric involvement of the SNs opens new horizons for the chromosome and centromere structure studies.     

Formation of primary constriction and heterochromatin in mouse does not require minor satellite DNA.

Whereas the major satellite fraction in mouse extends its domain from the centromere to the distal end of the pericentric heterochromatin, the minor satellite DNA is present specifically in the centromere or primary constriction. We hybridized the biotinylated minor satellite sequence to L929 cells of mouse origin. The sequence hybridized to all chromosomes. Whereas hybridization was detected on all active centromeres, the inactive centromeres in certain dicentrics did not show any signal. This satellite, however, was detected in all inactive centromeres in a heptacentric chromosome. The intensity of fluorescence on the inactive centromeres of the heptacentric was similar to that present on the active centromeres. Several heterochromatin blocks, which were not associated with any centromere, were also found to lack hybridization with the minor satellite. The inactive centromeres, whether carrying the minor satellite DNA fraction or not, generally do not react with the antikinetochore antibodies present in the scleroderma serum. These studies are interpreted to show that (1) the primary constriction in mouse can be formed without the participation of minor satellite, (2) heterochromatin in mouse may constitute without this fraction, (3) the major and minor satellite may not be interspersed but are joined at some defined boundary, and (4) the binding of CENP-B does not depend upon the quantity of minor satellite or the number of CENP boxes present in the inactive centromeres.