Mutations in the INK4a/ARF melanoma susceptibility locus functionally impair p14ARF

The INK4a/ARF locus encodes two cell cycle regulatory proteins, the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p16(INK4a), and the p53 activator, p14(ARF). Germline mutations in this locus are associated with melanoma susceptibility in 20-40% of multiple case melanoma families. Many of these mutations specifically impair p16(INK4a), whereas mutations uniquely targeting p14(ARF) are rare. Nevertheless, the importance of p14(ARF) has not been excluded because more than 40% of INK4a/ARF alterations affect p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF). We now report that p14(ARF) is functionally impaired in melanoma kindreds carrying INK4a/ARF mutations. Of the seven INK4a/ARF mutations tested, three altered the subcellular distribution of p14(ARF) and diminished the ability of p14(ARF) to activate the p53 pathway. This work establishes the importance of p14(ARF) in melanoma predisposition.     

Losses of both products of the Cdkn2a/Arf locus contribute to asbestos-induced mesothelioma development and cooperate to accelerate tumorigenesis

The CDKN2A/ARF locus encompasses overlapping tumor suppressor genes p16(INK4A) and p14(ARF), which are frequently co-deleted in human malignant mesothelioma (MM). The importance of p16(INK4A) loss in human cancer is well established, but the relative significance of p14(ARF) loss has been debated. The tumor predisposition of mice singly deficient for either Ink4a or Arf, due to targeting of exons 1α or 1β, respectively, supports the idea that both play significant and nonredundant roles in suppressing spontaneous tumors. To further test this notion, we exposed Ink4a(+/-) and Arf(+/-) mice to asbestos, the major cause of MM. Asbestos-treated Ink4a(+/-) and Arf(+/-) mice showed increased incidence and shorter latency of MM relative to wild-type littermates. MMs from Ink4a(+/-) mice exhibited biallelic inactivation of Ink4a, loss of Arf or p53 expression and frequent loss of p15(Ink4b). In contrast, MMs from Arf(+/-) mice exhibited loss of Arf expression, but did not require loss of Ink4a or Ink4b. Mice doubly deficient for Ink4a and Arf, due to deletion of Cdkn2a/Arf exon 2, showed accelerated asbestos-induced MM formation relative to mice deficient for Ink4a or Arf alone, and MMs exhibited biallelic loss of both tumor suppressor genes. The tumor suppressor function of Arf in MM was p53-independent, since MMs with loss of Arf retained functional p53. Collectively, these in vivo data indicate that both CDKN2A/ARF gene products suppress asbestos carcinogenicity. Furthermore, while inactivation of Arf appears to be crucial for MM pathogenesis, the inactivation of both p16(Ink4a) and p19(Arf) cooperate to accelerate asbestos-induced tumorigenesis.     

Simultaneous knockdown of BRAF and expression of INK4A in melanoma cells leads to potent growth inhibition and apoptosis

Abnormal BRAF and p16INK4A co-exist in 60% of melanomas. BRAF mutation also occurs in 80% of benign nevi where it turns-on p16INK4A resulting in proliferative senescence; loss of p16INK4A removes the inhibitory block leading to melanoma development. Since only melanomas with wild-type BRAF have amplified CDK4 and cyclin D1 genes, p16INK4A-CDK4/6-cyclin D pathway is viewed as linearly downstream of BRAF. Thus, co-occurrence of aberrant BRAF and INK4A may be remnant of changes during melanoma formation without functional significance. To explore this notion, we simultaneously knocked down BRAF (via siRNA) and expressed INK4A cDNA in melanoma cells and observed enhanced growth inhibition. Notably, although each alone had no statistically significant effect on apoptosis, co-expression of BRAF siRNA and INK4A cDNA caused potent apoptosis, which was associated with up-regulation of BIM and down-regulation of BCL2. Our results suggest that aberrant BRAF and INK4A cooperate to promote proliferation and survival of melanoma cells.     

p16INK4a and p14ARF methylation as a potential biomarker for human bladder cancer

Promoter hypermethylation is one of the putative mechanisms underlying the inactivation of negative cell-cycle regulators. We examined whether the methylation status of p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF), genes located upstream of the RB and p53 pathway, is a useful biomarker for the staging, clinical outcome, and prognosis of human bladder cancer. Using methylation-specific PCR (MSP), we examined the methylation status of p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) in 64 samples from 45 bladder cancer patients (34 males, 11 females). In 19 patients with recurrent bladder cancer, we examined paired tissue samples from their primary and recurrent tumors. The methylation status of representative samples was confirmed by bisulfite DNA sequencing analysis. The median follow-up duration was 34.3 months (range 27.0-100.1 months). The methylation rate for p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) was 17.8% and 31.1%, respectively, in the 45 patients. The incidence of p16(INKa) and p14(ARF) methylation was significantly higher in patients with invasive (>or=pT2) than superficial bladder cancer (pT1) (p=0.006 and p=0.001, respectively). No MSP bands for p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) were detected in the 8 patients with superficial, non-recurrent tumors. In 19 patients with tumor recurrence, the p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) methylation status of the primary and recurrent tumors was similar. Of the 22 patients who had undergone cystectomy, 8 (36.4%) manifested p16(INKa) methylation; p16(INK4a) was not methylated in 23 patients without cystectomy (p=0.002). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with p14(ARF) methylation had a significantly poorer prognosis than those without (p=0.029). This is the first study indicating that MSP analysis of p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) genes is a useful biomarker for the pathological stage, clinical outcome, and prognosis of patients with bladder cancer.     

Significant role for p16INK4a in p53-independent telomere-directed senescence

Telomere attrition in primary human fibroblasts induces replicative senescence accompanied by activation of the p53 and p16(INK4a)/RB tumor suppressor pathways. Although the contribution of p53 and its target, p21, to telomere-driven senescence have been well established, the role of p16(INK4a) is controversial. Attempts to dissect the significance of p16(INK4a) in response to telomere shortening have been hampered by the concomitant induction of p16(INK4a) by cell culture conditions. To circumvent this problem, we studied the role of p16(INK4a) in the cellular response to acute telomere damage induced by a dominant negative allele of TRF2, TRF2(Delta B Delta M). This approach avoids the confounding aspects of culture stress because parallel cultures with and without telomere damage can be compared. Telomere damage generated with TRF2(Delta B Delta M) resulted in induction of p16(INK4a) in the majority of cells as detected by immunohistochemistry. Inhibition of p16(INK4a) with shRNA or overexpression of BMI1 had a significant effect on the telomere damage response in p53-deficient cells. While p53 deficiency alone only partially abrogated the telomere damage-induced cell cycle arrest, combined inhibition of p16(INK4a) and p53 led to nearly complete bypass of telomere-directed senescence. We conclude that p16(INK4a) contributes to the p53-independent response to telomere damage.     

Significant Role for p16 in p53-Independent Telomere-Directed Senescence

Telomere attrition in primary human fibroblasts induces replicative senescence accompanied by activation of the p53 and p16(INK4a)/RB tumor suppressor pathways. Although the contribution of p53 and its target, p21, to telomere-driven senescence have been well established, the role of p16(INK4a) is controversial. Attempts to dissect the significance of p16(INK4a) in response to telomere shortening have been hampered by the concomitant induction of p16(INK4a) by cell culture conditions. To circumvent this problem, we studied the role of p16(INK4a) in the cellular response to acute telomere damage induced by a dominant negative allele of TRF2, TRF2(Delta B Delta M). This approach avoids the confounding aspects of culture stress because parallel cultures with and without telomere damage can be compared. Telomere damage generated with TRF2(Delta B Delta M) resulted in induction of p16(INK4a) in the majority of cells as detected by immunohistochemistry. Inhibition of p16(INK4a) with shRNA or overexpression of BMI1 had a significant effect on the telomere damage response in p53-deficient cells. While p53 deficiency alone only partially abrogated the telomere damage-induced cell cycle arrest, combined inhibition of p16(INK4a) and p53 led to nearly complete bypass of telomere-directed senescence. We conclude that p16(INK4a) contributes to the p53-independent response to telomere damage.     

miR-20a and miR-290, multi-faceted players with a role in tumourigenesis and senescence

Expression of microRNAs changes markedly in tumours and evidence indicates that they are causatively related to tumourigenesis, behaving as tumour suppressor microRNAs or onco microRNAs; in some cases they can behave as both depending on the type of cancer. Some tumour suppressor microRNAs appear to be an integral part of the p53 and Retinoblastoma (RB) network, the main regulatory pathways controlling senescence, a major tumour suppressor mechanism. The INK4a/ARF locus which codifies for two proteins, p19ARF and p16INK4a, plays a central role in senescence by controlling both p53 and RB. Recent evidence shows that the proto-oncogene leukaemia/lymphoma related factor, a p19ARF specific repressor, is controlled by miRNAs and that miRNAs, in particular miR-20a and miR-290, are causatively involved in mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEF) senescence in culture. Intriguingly, both miR-20a, member of the oncogenic miR-17-92 cluster, and miR-290, belonging to the miR-290-295 cluster, are highly expressed in embryonic stem (ES) cells. The pro-senescence role of miR-20a and miR-290 in MEF is apparently in contrast with their proliferative role in tumour and ES cells. We propose that miRNAs may exert opposing functions depending on the miRNAs repertoire as well as target/s level/s present in different cellular contexts, suggesting the importance of evaluating miRNAs activity in diverse genetic settings before their therapeutic use as tumour suppressors.     

p16INK4A and p19ARF act in overlapping pathways in cellular immortalization

The INK4A locus encodes two independent but overlapping genes, p16INK4A and p19ARF, and is frequently inactivated in human cancers. The unusual structure of this locus has lead to ambiguity regarding the biological role of each gene. Here we express, in primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), antisense RNA constructs directed specifically towards either p16INK4A or p19 ARF. Such constructs induce extended lifespan in primary MEFs; this lifespan extension is reversed upon subsequent elimination of the p16INK4A or p19ARF antisense constructs. In immortal derivatives of cell lines expressing antisense p16INK4A or p19ARF RNA, growth arrest induced by recovery of p16INK4A expression is bypassed by compromising the function of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), whereas growth arrest induced by re-expression of p19ARF is overcome only by simultaneous inactivation of both the Rb and the p53 pathways. Thus, the physically overlapping p16INK4A and p19ARF genes act in partly overlapping pathways.     

INK4a-deficient human diploid fibroblasts are resistant to RAS-induced senescence

The CDKN2A tumour suppressor locus encodes two distinct proteins, p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF), both of which have been implicated in replicative senescence, the state of permanent growth arrest provoked in somatic cells by aberrant proliferative signals or by cumulative population doublings in culture. Here we describe primary fibroblasts from a member of a melanoma-prone family who is homozygous for an intragenic deletion in CDKN2A. Analyses of the resultant gene products imply that the cells are p16(INK4a) deficient but express physiologically relevant levels of a frameshift protein that retains the known functions of p14(ARF). Although they have a finite lifespan, the cells are resistant to arrest by oncogenic RAS. Indeed, ectopic expression of RAS and telomerase (hTERT) results in outgrowth of anchorage-independent colonies that have essentially diploid karyotypes and functional p53. We find that in human fibroblasts, ARF is not induced demonstrably by RAS, pointing to significant differences between the proliferative barriers implemented by the CDKN2A locus in different cell types or species.     

INK4a/ARF: a multifunctional tumor suppressor locus

The INK4a/ARF locus encodes two physically linked tumor suppressor proteins, p16(INK4a) and ARF, which regulate the RB and p53 pathways, respectively. The unusual genomic relationship of the open reading frames of these proteins initially fueled speculation that only one of the two was the true tumor suppressor, and loss of the other merely coincidental in cancer. Recent human and mouse genetic data, however, have firmly established that both proteins possess significant in vivo tumor suppressor activity, although there appear to be species- and cell-type specific differences between the two. For example, ARF plays a clear role in preventing Myc-induced lymphomagenesis in mice, whereas the role for p16(INK4a) is human carcinomas is more firmly established. In this review, I discuss the evolutionary history of the locus, the relative importance of these tumor suppressor genes in human cancer, and recent information suggesting novel biochemical and physiologic functions of these proteins in vivo.     

A senescence program controlled by p53 and p16INK4a contributes to the outcome of cancer therapy

p53 and INK4a/ARF mutations promote tumorigenesis and drug resistance, in part, by disabling apoptosis. We show that primary murine lymphomas also respond to chemotherapy by engaging a senescence program controlled by p53 and p16(INK4a). Hence, tumors with p53 or INK4a/ARF mutations-but not those lacking ARF alone-respond poorly to cyclophosphamide therapy in vivo. Moreover, tumors harboring a Bcl2-mediated apoptotic block undergo a drug-induced cytostasis involving the accumulation of p53, p16(INK4a), and senescence markers, and typically acquire p53 or INK4a mutations upon progression to a terminal stage. Finally, mice bearing tumors capable of drug-induced senescence have a much better prognosis following chemotherapy than those harboring tumors with senescence defects. Therefore, cellular senescence contributes to treatment outcome in vivo.     

Replicative senescence as a barrier to human cancer

There is evidence that one critically short telomere may be recognized as DNA damage and, as a consequence, induce a p53/p21WAF- and p16INK4A-dependent G1 cell cycle checkpoint to cause senescence. Additionally, senescence via a p53- and p16(INK4A)-dependent mechanism can be induced by the over- or under-stimulation of certain signalling pathways that are involved in cancer. Central to this alternative senescence mechanism is the p14ARF protein, which connects oncogene activation, but not DNA damage, to p53 activation and senescence. We find that immortal keratinocytes almost invariably have dysfunctional p53 and p16 and have high levels of telomerase, but very often express a wild-type p14(ARF). Furthermore, when normal keratinocytes senesce they show a striking elevation of p16 protein, but not of p14(ARF) or its downstream targets p53 and p21(WAF). These results suggest that p16, rather than p14(ARF), is the more important gene in human keratinocyte senescence, but do not exclude a co-operative role for p14(ARF), perhaps in the induction of senescence by activated oncogenes in neoplasia. Regardless of mechanism, these results suggest that replicative senescence acts as a barrier to human cancer development.     

CARF is a novel protein that cooperates with mouse p19ARF (human p14ARF) in activating p53

The INK4a locus on chromosome 9p21 encodes two structurally distinct tumor suppressor proteins, p16(INK4a) and the alternative reading frame protein, ARF (p19(ARF) in mouse and p14(ARF) in human). Each of these proteins has a role in senescence of primary cells and activates pathways for cell cycle control and tumor suppression. The current prevailing model proposes that p19(ARF) activates p53 function by antagonizing its degradation by MDM2. It was, however, recently shown that stabilization of p53 by p14(ARF) occurs independent of the relocalization of MDM2 to the nucleolus. We have identified a novel collaborator of ARF, CARF. It co-localizes and interacts with ARF in the nucleolus. We demonstrate that CARF is co-regulated with ARF, cooperates with it in activating p53, and thus acts as a novel component of the ARF-p53-p21 pathway.