Genetic Control of the Formation and Reorganization of Chromocenter in Drosophila

The chromocenter integrates the entire Drosophilagenome into a unit. The formation and reorganization of chromocenter are genetically determined. Currently, several mutations affecting the structure of chromocenter have been described. In this work, I present evidence on the time of the formation and reorganization of chromocenter in mitotic and meiotic cells of females of the wild type and the ff16mutant line obtained by selection of mosaic clones produced from mitotic recombination of chromosomes in the dividing embryo cells. In females homozygous for this mutation, the second stage of the formation of chromocenter (joining two groups of nonhomologous chromosomes X-4 and 2-3 into a united ring structure =X=2=3=4=) is disturbed. The differences between the mitotic and meiotic reorganization of chromocenter and the role of chromocenter in the control of chromosome segregation are discussed.     

Features of the chromocenter structure in Drosophila melanogaster larva cells, mutant for genes C(3)G and NOD

Homolog pairing, chromosome morphology, and chromosome disjunction in the first meiotic division were studied in the oocytes of c(3)G/c(3)G female Drosophila melanogaster at developmental stages 3-4 and 14. It was found that homologs were completely or partly paired in some cells (about 20% in either case). The lengths of chromosomes in +/+, +/c(3)G, and c(3)G/c(3)G cells were at a ratio of 1.0:1.6:2.2. The chromocenters of homozygous cells had an abnormal structure. There was no meiotic block in metaphase 1, and chromosomes only segregated equally in about 80% of anaphases of the first meiotic division. The data obtained correspond to the abnormal variants of the formation of the chromocenter in c(3)G/c(3)G females that could be predicted based on the two-ring structure of the chromocenter. The mechanism of the effect of the homo- and heterozygosity for the hypomorphic mutation c(3)G on the formation of the synaptonemal complex (SC) and crossing over frequency was suggested. In nod/nod homozygous females, asynapsis of pericentromeric regions of homologs was observed in the chromocenter. It was assumed that NOD kinezin is necessary at the last stages of pairing of the pericentromeric regions of homologs and formation of the coordinating bonds between them.     

Puzzling chromosome behavior in triploid females of Drosophila melanogaster

Based on a particular formation of the chromocenter and trivalents in triploid Drosophila females, as well as on asynapsis in pericentromeric regions (which is a result of trivalent competition), an explanation for the increased frequency of crossing over and nonrandom segregation of the X chromosomes and autosomes in the first meiotic division is suggested. It is proposed that a delay in pairing of the pericentromeric heterochromatic chromosome regions combined into a single chromocenter leads to the following: (1) formation of the heteroduplex structures (X structures) takes more time and, consequently, their number and the frequency of crossing over in the paired chromosome regions increases; (2) in nonhomologous chromosomes, the chromocentral connections, which normally degrade in prometaphase, are retained to fulfill a function of coorientation during the first meiotic division.     

Puzzling Chromosome Behavior in Triploid Females of Drosophila melanogaster

Based on a particular formation of the chromocenter and trivalents in triploid Drosophila females, as well as on asynapsis in pericentromeric regions (which is a result of trivalent competition), an explanation for the increased frequency of crossing over and nonrandom segregation of the X chromosomes and autosomes in the first meiotic division is suggested. It is proposed that a delay in pairing of the pericentromeric heterochromatic chromosome regions combined into a single chromocenter leads to the following: (1) formation of the heteroduplex structures (X structures) takes more time and, consequently, their number and the frequency of crossing over in the paired chromosome regions increases; (2) in nonhomologous chromosomes, the chromocentral connections, which normally degrade in prometaphase, are retained to fulfill a function of coorientation during the first meiotic division.     

Structural Characteristics of the Chromocenter in Ovary Cells ofc(3)Gand nodMutants of Drosophila melanogaster

Homolog pairing, chromosome morphology, and chromosome disjunction in the first meiotic division were studied in the oocytes of c(3)G/c(3)Gfemale Drosophila melanogasterat developmental stages 3–4 and 14. It was found that homologs were completely or partly paired in some cells (about 20% in either case). The lengths of chromosomes in +/+, +/c(3)G, and c(3)G/c(3)Gcells were at a ratio of 1.0 : 1.6 : 2.2. The chromocenters of homozygous cells had an abnormal structure. There was no meiotic block in metaphase 1, and chromosomes only segregated equally in about 80% of anaphases of the first meiotic division. The data obtained correspond to the abnormal variants of the formation of the chromocenter in c(3)G/c(3)Gfemales that could be predicted based on the two-ring structure of the chromocenter. The mechanism of the effect of the homo- and heterozygosity for the hypomorphic mutation c(3)Gon the formation of the synaptonemal complex (SC) and crossing over frequency was suggested. In nod/nodhomozygous females, asynapsis of pericentromeric regions of homologs was observed in the chromocenter. It was assumed that NOD kinezin is necessary at the last stages of pairing of the pericentromeric regions of homologs and formation of the coordinating bonds between them.     

The Drosophila Salivary Gland Chromocenter Contains Highly Polytenized Subdomains of Mitotic Heterochromatin

Peri-centromeric regions of Drosophila melanogaster chromosomes appear heterochromatic in mitotic cells and become greatly underrepresented in giant polytene chromosomes, where they aggregate into a central mass called the chromocenter. We used P elements inserted at sites dispersed throughout much of the mitotic heterochromatin to analyze the fate of 31 individual sites during polytenization. Analysis of DNA sequences flanking many of these elements revealed that middle repetitive or unique sequence DNAs frequently are interspersed with satellite DNAs in mitotic heterochromatin. All nine Y chromosome sites tested were underrepresented >20-fold on Southern blots of polytene DNA and were rarely or never detected by in situ hybridization to salivary gland chromosomes. In contrast, nine tested insertions in autosomal centromeric heterochromatin were represented fully in salivary gland DNA, despite the fact that at least six were located proximal to known blocks of satellite DNA. The inserted sequences formed diverse, site-specific morphologies in the chromocenter of salivary gland chromosomes, suggesting that domains dispersed at multiple sites in the centromeric heterochromatin of mitotic chromosomes contribute to polytene β-heterochromatin. We suggest that regions containing heterochromatic genes are organized into dispersed chromatin configurations that are important for their function in vivo.     

Condensin restructures chromosomes in preparation for meiotic divisions

The production of haploid gametes from diploid germ cells requires two rounds of meiotic chromosome segregation after one round of replication. Accurate meiotic chromosome segregation involves the remodeling of each pair of homologous chromosomes around the site of crossover into a highly condensed and ordered structure. We showed that condensin, the protein complex needed for mitotic chromosome compaction, restructures chromosomes during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. In particular, condensin promotes both meiotic chromosome condensation after crossover recombination and the remodeling of sister chromatids. Condensin helps resolve cohesin-independent linkages between sister chromatids and alleviates recombination-independent linkages between homologues. The safeguarding of chromosome resolution by condensin permits chromosome segregation and is crucial for the formation of discrete, individualized bivalent chromosomes.     

The role of the chromocenter in nonrandom meiotic segregation of nonhomologous chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster females

The evidence supporting universal significance of physical links between pericentromeric regions of homologous chromosomes for their bipolar orientation during the first meiotic division is discussed. The pericentromeric chiasmata between homologs or (in the absence of the latter) chromocentric links between nonhomologs, which are preserved until prometaphase, compensate for the disturbed binding between homologous pericentromeric regions in both structural or locus mutants. When the links between nonhomologs are involved, interchromosomal effects on chromosome disjunction and nonhomologous pairing were revealed by the genetic methods. An explanation suggested for genetic events observed during Drosophila meiosis conforms with the original, cytogenetically proved model of the orderly two-ring chromocenter formation and reorganization.     

Bivalent individualization during chromosome territory formation in Drosophila spermatocytes by controlled condensin II protein activity and additional force generators

Reduction of genome ploidy from diploid to haploid necessitates stable pairing of homologous chromosomes into bivalents before the start of the first meiotic division. Importantly, this chromosome pairing must avoid interlocking of non-homologous chromosomes. In spermatocytes of Drosophila melanogaster, where homolog pairing does not involve synaptonemal complex formation and crossovers, associations between non-homologous chromosomes are broken up by chromosome territory formation in early spermatocytes. Extensive non-homologous associations arise from the coalescence of the large blocks of pericentromeric heterochromatin into a chromocenter and from centromere clustering. Nevertheless, during territory formation, bivalents are moved apart into spatially separate subnuclear regions. The condensin II subunits, Cap-D3 and Cap-H2, have been implicated, but the remarkable separation of bivalents during interphase might require more than just condensin II. For further characterization of this process, we have applied time-lapse imaging using fluorescent markers of centromeres, telomeres and DNA satellites in pericentromeric heterochromatin. We describe the dynamics of the disruption of centromere clusters and the chromocenter in normal spermatocytes. Mutations in Cap-D3 and Cap-H2 abolish chromocenter disruption, resulting in excessive chromosome missegregation during M I. Chromocenter persistence in the mutants is not mediated by the special system, which conjoins homologs in compensation for the absence of crossovers in Drosophila spermatocytes. However, overexpression of Cap-H2 precluded conjunction between autosomal homologs, resulting in random segregation of univalents. Interestingly, Cap-D3 and Cap-H2 mutant spermatocytes displayed conspicuous stretching of the chromocenter, as well as occasional chromocenter disruption, suggesting that territory formation might involve forces unrelated to condensin II. While the molecular basis of these forces remains to be clarified, they are not destroyed by inhibitors of F actin and microtubules. Our results indicate that condensin II activity promotes chromosome territory formation in co-operation with additional force generators and that careful co-ordination with alternative homolog conjunction is crucial.     

A Meiotic Chromosomal Core Consisting of Cohesin Complex Proteins Recruits DNA Recombination Proteins and Promotes Synapsis in the Absence of an Axial Element in Mammalian Meiotic Cells

The behavior of meiotic chromosomes differs in several respects from that of their mitotic counterparts, resulting in the generation of genetically distinct haploid cells. This has been attributed in part to a meiosis-specific chromatin-associated protein structure, the synaptonemal complex. This complex consist of two parallel axial elements, each one associated with a pair of sister chromatids, and a transverse filament located between the synapsed homologous chromosomes. Recently, a different protein structure, the cohesin complex, was shown to be associated with meiotic chromosomes and to be required for chromosome segregation. To explore the functions of the two different protein structures, the synaptonemal complex and the cohesin complex, in mammalian male meiotic cells, we have analyzed how absence of the axial element affects early meiotic chromosome behavior. We find that the synaptonemal complex protein 3 (SCP3) is a main determinant of axial-element assembly and is required for attachment of this structure to meiotic chromosomes, whereas SCP2 helps shape the in vivo structure of the axial element. We also show that formation of a cohesin-containing chromosomal core in meiotic nuclei does not require SCP3 or SCP2. Our results also suggest that the cohesin core recruits recombination proteins and promotes synapsis between homologous chromosomes in the absence of an axial element. A model for early meiotic chromosome pairing and synapsis is proposed.     

Role of the Chromocenter in Nonrandom Meiotic Segregation of Nonhomologous Chromosomes inDrosophila melanogasterFemales

The evidence supporting universal significance of physical links between pericentromeric regions of homologous chromosomes for their bipolar orientation during the first meiotic division is discussed. The pericentromeric chiasmata between homologs or (in the absence of the latter) chromocentric links between nonhomologs, which are preserved until prometaphase, compensate for the disturbed binding between homologous pericentromeric regions in both structural or locus mutants. When the links between nonhomologs are involved, interchromosomal effects on chromosome disjunction and nonhomologous pairing were revealed by the genetic methods. An explanation suggested for genetic events observed during Drosophilameiosis conforms with the original, cytogenetically proved model of the orderly two-ring chromocenter formation and reorganization.     

Folded chromosomes in meiotic yeast cells: analysis of early meiotic events.

Analysis of folded chromosomes in cells under standard sporulation conditions shows that the g₀ form of the folded genome is used as the entry into meiosis. Premeiotic DNA replication is initiated from the g₀ structure. In contrast, mitotic DNA replication is preceded by a characteristic pre-replicative form, g₁. Nonetheless, the mitotic and meiotic replication structures are indistinguishable by sedimentation. Preliminary evidence also suggests that the meiotic equivalent of the mitotic post-replicative structure, g₂, is absent. In strains homozygous for the mating type locus, aa and αα, meiotic replicating structures are not detected, and the folded chromosomes remain in a non-cycling form. However, this non-cycling form is distinguishable from the g₀ form of aα. cells.     

Dynamics of satellite binding protein CENP-B and telomere binding protein TRF2/MTBP in the nuclei of mouse spermatogenic line

The location of centromeric protein CENP-B and telomeric protein TRF2/MTBP in the mouse spermatogenic line has been studied using indirect immunofluorescent and immunoelectron microscopy. CENP-B localized to the heterochromatic parts of the nuclei at meiotic stages. A clearly distinct chromocenter forms in the nucleus at stages 3-4 of spermatid maturation; CENP-B localizes in it and in the area adjacent to the future acrosome. CENP-B localization in the subacrosomal area and in the chromocenters' periphery demonstrates that centromeres are organized in two groups in mouse spermatozoa, unlike human centromeres. TRF2/MTBP concentrates around the forming chromocenter at spermiogenesis early stages. The TRF2/MTBP main signal migrates into the area of acrosomal membrane at the course of spermatozoon maturation. TRF2/MTBP never localizes inside the synaptonemal complex but can be found in the areas where the synaptonemal complex attaches to the nuclear envelope. At the pachytene and diplotene stages when chromosomes separate from the nuclear envelope, some amount of the protein remains bound to the nuclear membrane while the other part reveals itself in chromosomes. TRF2/MTBP accumulates in the future acrosome from the very beginning of its formation. In the mature spermatozoon TRF2/MTBP decorates the acrosomal membrane as well as spreads in condensed chromatin.     

C-heterochromatin during synapsis and recombination in grey cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea spermatogenesis

The behavior of large, distal, C-heterochromatic blocks in the spermatogenesis of the grey cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea was investigated by light and electron microscopy. In early meiotic prophase I, heterochromatic blocks of some autosomes are involved in the nonhomologous association and form a chromocenter. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with a ribosomal DNA (rDNA) probe revealed the signal on only two pairs of middle chromosomes not engaged in the chromocenter formation; therefore, ectopic conjugation was not caused by the formation of a nucleolus. Analysis showed that chromocentric heterochromatin does not participate (functionally or spatially) in basic meiotic events. Heterochromatin does not participate in the formation of a bouquet, initiation of homologous synapsis, or recombination events. The chromocenter disintegrates at the end of the pachytene when synapsis is totally completed. Heterochromatin polymorphism results in asymmetric synaptonemal complexes (SCs) with different degrees of synaptic adjustment. The axis of the sex univalent (male sex determination is XO) is split in various sites, regardless of heterochromatin localization.     

KLP-18, a Klp2 kinesin,is required for assembly of acentrosomal meiotic spindles in Caenorhabditis elegans

The proper segregation of chromosomes during meiosis or mitosis requires the assembly of well organized spindles. In many organisms, meiotic spindles lack centrosomes. The formation of such acentrosomal spindles seems to involve first assembly or capture of microtubules (MTs) in a random pattern around the meiotic chromosomes and then parallel bundling and bipolar organization by the action of MT motors and other proteins. Here, we describe the structure, distribution, and function of KLP-18, a Caenorhabditis elegans Klp2 kinesin. Previous reports of Klp2 kinesins agree that it concentrates in spindles, but do not provide a clear view of its function. During prometaphase, metaphase, and anaphase, KLP-18 concentrates toward the poles in both meiotic and mitotic spindles. Depletion of KLP-18 by RNA-mediated interference prevents parallel bundling/bipolar organization of the MTs that accumulate around female meiotic chromosomes. Hence, meiotic chromosome segregation fails, leading to haploid or aneuploid embryos. Subsequent assembly and function of centrosomal mitotic spindles is normal except when aberrant maternal chromatin is present. This suggests that although KLP-18 is critical for organizing chromosome-derived MTs into a parallel bipolar spindle, the order inherent in centrosome-derived astral MT arrays greatly reduces or eliminates the need for KLP-18 organizing activity in mitotic spindles.     

Morphology and Meiotic/Mitotic Behavior of B Cromosomes in a Japanese Harvestman, Metagagrella tenuipes (Arachnida: Opiliones): No Evidence for B Accumulation Mechanisms

Earlier, it has been demonstrated that wild populations of a Japanese harvestman Metagagrella tenuipes (Arachnida: Opiliones) are polymorphic for B chromosomes. In this paper, we present results of a study of the morphology and mitotic and meiotic behavior of the Bs. The B chromosomes varied considerably in size and proportion of eu- and heterochromatin. The single nucleolus organizing region, found in males, was located on a chromosome of the A complement. Some intercell variation in number of Bs may be explained by accidental chromosome losses during chromosome preparation. We also found no intertissue variation in number of Bs. There were also no differences in mean number of B chromosomes per individual among males and females, adult and subadult harvestmen. Segregation of Bs in mitotic and meiotic divisions was nonrandom; B chromosomes tended to segregate equally between daughter cells. The results obtained provide no support for the hypothesis of existence of B accumulation mechanism in this species.     

玉兰减数分裂观察及染色体构型分析

采用去壁低渗方法,观察研究了玉兰Magnolia denudata有丝分裂和减数分裂的细胞学特征。实验结果证实玉兰存在两种染色体倍性,即2n=4x=76和2n=6x=114。通常,在木兰属甚至整个木兰科每个物种只具有一种染色体数目。玉兰有丝分裂间期核为复杂染色中心型,其中期染色体较小。玉兰在减数分裂中期I的构型表现出多样性,其中最主要的特点是比同源多倍体预期的二价体出现的频率更高些,其次是在减数分裂中期I可以观察到1或2个环状和（或）链状六价体。这些特征与同源异源六倍体或部分的异源六倍体种北美红杉Sequ     

The Heterochromatic Rolled Gene of Drosophila Melanogaster Is Extensively Polytenized and Transcriptionally Active in the Salivary Gland Chromocenter

This paper reports a cytogenetic and molecular study of the structural and functional organization of the Drosophila melanogaster chromocenter. The relations between mitotic (constitutive) heterochromatin and α- and β-heterochromatin are not fully understood. In the present work, we have studied the polytenization of the rolled (rl) locus, a 100-kb genomic region that maps to the proximal heterochromatin of chromosome 2 and has been previously thought to contribute to α-heterochromatin. We show that rolled undergoes polytenization in salivary gland chromosomes to a degree comparable to that of euchromatic genes, despite its deep heterochromatic location. In contrast, both the Bari-1 sequences and the AAGAC satellite repeats, located respectively to the left and right of rl, are severely underrepresented and thus both appear to be α-heterochromatic. In addition, we found that rl is transcribed in polytene tissues. Together, the results reported here indicate that functional sequences located within the proximal constitutive heterochromatin can undergo polytenization, contributing to the formation of β-heterochromatin. The implications of this finding to chromocenter structure are discussed.