Loss of the rpl32 gene from the chloroplast genome and subsequent acquisition of a preexisting transit peptide within the nuclear gene in Populus

Gene transfer events from organelle genomes (mitochondria and chloroplasts in plants) to the nuclear genome are important processes in the evolution of the eukaryotic cell. It is highly likely that the gene transfer event is still an ongoing process in higher plant mitochondria and chloroplasts. The number and order of genes encoded in the chloroplast genome of higher plants are highly conserved. Recently, several exceptional cases of gene loss from the chloroplast genome have been discovered as the number of complete chloroplast genome sequences has increased. The Populus chloroplast genome has lost the rpl32 gene, while the corresponding the chloroplast rpl32 (cp rpl32) gene has been identified in the nuclear genome. Nuclear genes transferred from the chloroplast genome need to gain a sequence that encodes a transit peptide. Here, we revealed that the nuclear cp rpl32 gene has acquired the exon sequence, which is highly homologous to a transit peptide derived from the chloroplast Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase (cp sod-1) gene. The cp rpl32 gene has acquired the sequence that encodes not only for the transit peptide, but also for the conserved N-terminal portion of the mature SOD protein from the cp sod-1 gene, suggesting the occurrence of DNA sequence duplication. Unlike cp SOD-1, cp RPL32 did not show biased localization in the chloroplasts. This difference may be caused by mutations accumulated in the sequence of the SOD domain on the cp rpl32 gene. We provide new insight into the fate of the inherent sequence derived from a transit peptide.     

The Cryo-EM structure of a complete 30S translation initiation complex from Escherichia coli

Formation of the 30S initiation complex (30S IC) is an important checkpoint in regulation of gene expression. The selection of mRNA, correct start codon, and the initiator fMet-tRNA(fMet) requires the presence of three initiation factors (IF1, IF2, IF3) of which IF3 and IF1 control the fidelity of the process, while IF2 recruits fMet-tRNA(fMet). Here we present a cryo-EM reconstruction of the complete 30S IC, containing mRNA, fMet-tRNA(fMet), IF1, IF2, and IF3. In the 30S IC, IF2 contacts IF1, the 30S subunit shoulder, and the CCA end of fMet-tRNA(fMet), which occupies a novel P/I position (P/I1). The N-terminal domain of IF3 contacts the tRNA, whereas the C-terminal domain is bound to the platform of the 30S subunit. Binding of initiation factors and fMet-tRNA(fMet) induces a rotation of the head relative to the body of the 30S subunit, which is likely to prevail through 50S subunit joining until GTP hydrolysis and dissociation of IF2 take place. The structure provides insights into the mechanism of mRNA selection during translation initiation.     

The ribosome‐bound initiation factor 2 recruits initiator tRNA to the 30S initiation complex

Bacterial translation initiation factor 2 (IF2) is a GTPase that promotes the binding of the initiator fMet‐tRNA^fMet to the 30S ribosomal subunit. It is often assumed that IF2 delivers fMet‐tRNA^fMet to the ribosome in a ternary complex, IF2·GTP·fMet‐tRNA^fMet. By using rapid kinetic techniques, we show here that binding of IF2·GTP to the 30S ribosomal subunit precedes and is independent of fMet‐tRNA^fMet binding. The ternary complex formed in solution by IF2·GTP and fMet‐tRNA is unstable and dissociates before IF2·GTP and, subsequently, fMet‐tRNA^fMet bind to the 30S subunit. Ribosome‐bound IF2 might accelerate the recruitment of fMet‐tRNA^fMet to the 30S initiation complex by providing anchoring interactions or inducing a favourable ribosome conformation. The mechanism of action of IF2 seems to be different from that of tRNA carriers such as EF‐Tu, SelB and eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), instead resembling that of eIF5B, the eukaryotic subunit association factor.     

Conformational transition of initiation factor 2 from the GTP- to GDP-bound state visualized on the ribosome

Initiation of protein synthesis is a universally conserved event that requires initiation factors IF1, IF2 and IF3 in prokaryotes. IF2 is a GTPase essential for binding initiator transfer RNA to the 30S ribosomal subunit and recruiting the 50S subunit into the 70S initiation complex. We present two cryo-EM structures of the assembled 70S initiation complex comprising mRNA, fMet-tRNA(fMet) and IF2 with either a non-hydrolyzable GTP analog or GDP. Transition from the GTP-bound to the GDP-bound state involves substantial conformational changes of IF2 and of the entire ribosome. In the GTP analog-bound state, IF2 interacts mostly with the 30S subunit and extends to the initiator tRNA in the peptidyl (P) site, whereas in the GDP-bound state IF2 steps back and adopts a 'ready-to-leave' conformation. Our data also provide insights into the molecular mechanism guiding release of IF1 and IF3.     

Structure-function analysis of Escherichia coli translation initiation factor IF3: tyrosine 107 and lysine 110 are required for ribosome binding.

Translation initiation factor IF3 is required for peptide chain initiation in Escherichia coli. IF3 binds directly to 30S ribosomal subunits ensuring a constant supply of free 30S subunits for initiation complex formation, participates in the kinetic selection of the correct initiator region of mRNA, and destabilizes initiation complexes containing noninitiator tRNAs. The roles that tyrosine 107 and lysine 110 play in IF3 function were examined by site-directed mutagenesis. Tyrosine 107 was changed to either phenylalanine (Y107F) or leucine (Y107L), and lysine 110 was converted to either arginine (K110R) or leucine (K110L). These single amino acid changes resulted in a reduced affinity of IF3 for 30S subunits. Association equilibrium constants (M-1) for 30S subunit binding were as follows: wild-type, 7.8 x 10(7); Y107F, 4.1 x 10(7); Y107L, 1 x 10(7); K110R, 5.1 x 10(6); K110L, < 1 x 10(2). The mutant IF3s were similarly impaired in their abilities to specifically select initiation complexes containing tRNA(fMet). Toeprint analysis indicated that 5-fold more Y107L or K110R protein was required for proper initiator tRNA selection. K110L protein was unable to mediate this selection even at concentrations up to 10-fold higher than wild type. The results indicate that tyrosine 107 and lysine 110 are critical components of the ribosome binding domain of IF3 and, furthermore, that dissociation of complexes containing noninitiator tRNAs requires prior binding of IF3 to the ribosomes.     

Structure of the fMet-tRNA(fMet)-binding domain of B. stearothermophilus initiation factor IF2

The three-dimensional structure of the fMet-tRNA(fMet) -binding domain of translation initiation factor IF2 from Bacillus stearothermophilus has been determined by heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. Its structure consists of six antiparallel beta-strands, connected via loops, and forms a closed beta-barrel similar to domain II of elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G, despite low sequence homology. Two structures of the ternary complexes of the EF-Tu small middle dotaminoacyl-tRNA small middle dot GDP analogue have been reported and were used to propose and discuss the possible fMet-tRNA(fMet)-binding site of IF2.     

Characterization of 16S rRNA mutations that decrease the fidelity of translation initiation

In bacteria, initiation of translation is kinetically controlled by factors IF1, IF2, and IF3, which work in conjunction with the 30S subunit to ensure accurate selection of the initiator tRNA (fMet-tRNA(fMet)) and the start codon. Here, we show that mutations G1338A and A790G of 16S rRNA decrease initiation fidelity in vivo and do so in distinct ways. Mutation G1338A increases the affinity of tRNA(fMet) for the 30S subunit, suggesting that G1338 normally forms a suboptimal Type II interaction with fMet-tRNA(fMet). By stabilizing fMet-tRNA(fMet) in the preinitiation complex, G1338A may partially compensate for mismatches in the codon-anti-codon helix and thereby increase spurious initiation. Unlike G1338A, A790G decreases the affinity of IF3 for the 30S subunit. This may indirectly stabilize fMet-tRNA(fMet) in the preinitiation complex and/or promote premature docking of the 50S subunit, resulting in increased levels of spurious initiation.     

Tandem translation of E. coli initiation factor IF2 beta: purification and characterization in vitro of two active forms.

Two forms of E. coli initiation factor IF2, IF2 alpha and IF2 beta, have been known for several years. Both forms are products of the gene infB with translational initiation at codon 1 (AUG) and codon 158 (GUG) in the same reading frame. In this work we demonstrate that IF2 beta exists in two forms, IF2 beta and IF2 beta' with initiation codons 158 (GUG) and 165 (AUG) and molecular masses of 79.7 kDa and 78.8 kDa respectively. We have recently described a fast purification method for IF2 alpha, using an FPLC procedure consisting of ion-exchange liquid chromatography on Q Sepharose HP, Mono Q and Mono S. After the Mono Q step, an apparently homogeneous IF2 beta was observed when analyzed by SDS-PAGE. However the chromatography on Mono S results in the elution of two peaks containing IF2 beta. The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the two proteins identified the first peak to be IF2 beta and the second as a protein which we term IF2 beta' starting seven residues downstream at the AUG codon 165. The activity in vitro of the two purified forms of IF2 beta was tested by measuring the stimulation of binding of the initiator fMet-tRNA(fMet) to 70S ribosomes in the presence of GTP and poly(A,U,G) as messenger-RNA. In this assay no difference in activity is detected.     

Characterization of the translational start site for IF2 beta, a short form of Escherichia coli initiation factor IF2

The gene for initiation factor IF2, infB, represents one of the few examples in Escherichia coli of genes encoding two protein products in vivo. In a previous work, our group showed that both forms of IF2 (alpha and beta) are closely related and may arise from two independent translational events on infB mRNA. Unambiguous mapping and rigorous determination of the nature of the initiation triplet for IF2 beta, the smaller form of IF2, is critical for future mutagenesis of this codon, required for investigating the biological importance of both IF2 alpha and IF2 beta. Three types of experiments were carried out. First, a 77-bp deletion was created at the beginning of the structural gene leading to premature termination of IF2 alpha synthesis. Under these conditions, IF2 beta is still formed. Second, various Bal31 digests of infB containing the 77-bp deletion were fused to lacZ. Any synthesis of a fused protein with beta-galactosidase activity should reflect the occurrence of an initiation event on the messenger corresponding to this DNA segment. It was consequently possible to locate the IF2 beta initiation site within an 18-base region containing an in-phase GUG codon. Third, to avoid any artefactual reinitiation event possibly occurring under our experimental conditions, we fused to lacZ an infB fragment devoid of IF2 alpha start sequences but containing genetic information for this 18-base region. A hybrid protein with beta-galactosidase activity was synthesized. Moreover, its NH2-terminal amino acid sequence coincided with that of IF2 beta, demonstrating that GUG, located 471 bases downstream from the IF2 alpha external start codon, is the internal start codon for the shorter form of IF2.     

Initiation factor 2 of Myxococcus xanthus, a large version of prokaryotic translation initiation factor 2

We have isolated the structural gene for translation initiation factor IF2 (infB) from the myxobacterium Myxococcus xanthus. The gene (3.22 kb) encodes a 1,070-residue protein showing extensive homology within its G domain and C terminus to the equivalent regions of IF2 from Escherichia coli. The protein cross-reacts with antibodies raised against E. coli IF2 and was able to complement an E. coli infB mutant. The M. xanthus protein is the largest IF2 known to date. This is essentially due to a longer N-terminal region made up of two characteristic domains. The first comprises a 188-amino-acid sequence consisting essentially of alanine, proline, valine, and glutamic acid residues, similar to the APE domain observed in Stigmatella aurantiaca IF2. The second is unique to M. xanthus IF2, is located between the APE sequence and the GTP binding domain, and consists exclusively of glycine, proline, and arginine residues.     

The cryo-EM structure of a translation initiation complex from Escherichia coli

The 70S ribosome and its complement of factors required for initiation of translation in E. coli were purified separately and reassembled in vitro with GDPNP, producing a stable initiation complex (IC) stalled after 70S assembly. We have obtained a cryo-EM reconstruction of the IC showing IF2*GDPNP at the intersubunit cleft of the 70S ribosome. IF2*GDPNP contacts the 30S and 50S subunits as well as fMet-tRNA(fMet). IF2 here adopts a conformation radically different from that seen in the recent crystal structure of IF2. The C-terminal domain of IF2 binds to the single-stranded portion of fMet-tRNA(fMet), thereby forcing the tRNA into a novel orientation at the P site. The GTP binding domain of IF2 binds to the GTPase-associated center of the 50S subunit in a manner similar to EF-G and EF-Tu. Additionally, we present evidence for the localization of IF1, IF3, one C-terminal domain of L7/L12, and the N-terminal domain of IF2 in the initiation complex.     

Structural and functional domains of E coli initiation factor IF2.

Initiation of translation in prokaryotes requires the participation of at least three soluble proteins: the initiation factors IF1, IF2 and IF3. Initiation factor 2, which is one of the largest proteins involved in translation (97.3 kDa) has been shown to stimulate in vitro the binding of fMet-tRNA(fMet) to the 30S ribosomal subunit. After formation of 70S translation initiation complex, IF2 is believed to participate in GTP hydrolysis, thereby promoting its own release. Here we review evidence which indicates the functional importance of the different structural domains of IF2, emphasizing new information obtained by in vivo experiments.