Affinity-based screening of MDM2/MDMX–p53 interaction inhibitors by chemical array: Identification of novel peptidic inhibitors

MDM2 and MDMX are oncoproteins that negatively regulate the activity and stability of the tumor suppressor protein p53. The inhibitors of protein–protein interactions (PPIs) of MDM2–p53 and MDMX–p53 represent potential anticancer agents. In this study, a novel approach for identifying MDM2–p53 and MDMX–p53 PPI inhibitor candidates by affinity-based screening using a chemical array has been established. A number of compounds from an in-house compound library, which were immobilized onto a chemical array, were screened for interaction with fluorescence-labeled MDM2 and MDMX proteins. The subsequent fluorescent polarization assay identified several compounds that inhibited MDM2–p53 and MDMX–p53 interactions.     

Investigation of the inhibitory mechanism of apomorphine against MDM2–p53 interaction

Mirror-image screening using d-proteins is a powerful approach to provide mirror-image structures of chiral natural products for drug screening. During the course of our screening study for novel MDM2–p53 interaction inhibitors, we identified that NPD6878 (R-(?)-apomorphine) inhibited both the native l-MDM2–l-p53 interaction and the mirror-image d-MDM2–d-p53 interaction at equipotent doses. In addition, both enantiomers of apomorphine showed potent inhibitory activity against the native MDM2–p53 interaction. In this study, we investigated the inhibitory mechanism of both enantiomers of apomorphine against the MDM2–p53 interaction. Achiral oxoapomorphine, which was converted from chiral apomorphines under aerobic conditions, served as the reactive species to form a covalent bond at Cys77 of MDM2, leading to the inhibitory effect against the binding to p53.     

RYBP stabilizes p53 by modulating MDM2

The mouse double minute 2 (MDM2)–p53 interaction regulates the activity of p53 and is a potential target for human cancer therapy. Here, we report that RYBP (RING1‐ and YY1‐binding protein), a member of the polycomb group (PcG), interacts with MDM2 and decreases MDM2‐mediated p53 ubiquitination, leading to stabilization of p53 and an increase in p53 activity. RYBP induces cell‐cycle arrest and is involved in the p53 response to DNA damage. Expression of RYBP is decreased in human cancer tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. These results show that RYBP is a new regulator of the MDM2–p53 loop and that it has tumour suppressor activity.     

MDM2 and promyelocytic leukemia antagonize each other through their direct interaction with p53

p53 can be regulated through post-translational modifications and through interactions with positive and negative regulatory factors. MDM2 binding inhibits p53 and promotes its degradation by the proteasome, whereas promyelocytic leukemia (PML) activates p53 by recruiting it to multiprotein complexes termed PML-nuclear bodies. We reported previously an in vivo and in vitro interaction between PML and MDM2 that is independent of p53. In the current study, we investigated whether interaction between MDM2 and PML can indirectly affect p53 activity. Increasing amounts of MDM2 inhibited p53 activation by PML but could not inhibit PML-mediated activation of a p53 fusion protein that lacked the MDM2-binding domain. Conversely, increasing amounts of PML could overcome p53 inhibition by MDM2 but could not overcome MDM2-mediated inhibition of a p53 fusion protein that lacked the PML-binding domain. These results demonstrate that MDM2 and PML can antagonize each other through their direct interaction with p53 and suggest the combined effects of MDM2 and PML on p53 function are determined by the relative level of each protein. Furthermore, these results imply that interactions between MDM2 and PML by themselves have little or no effect on p53 activity.     

Over-expression of the human MDM2 p53 binding domain by fusion to a p53 transactivation peptide

MDM2 binds to the tumor suppressor protein p53 and regulates the level of p53 in cells. Although it is possible to prepare a small amount of the region of MDM2 that binds to p53, the expression level of this fragment of MDM2 is relatively low, limiting the studies involving this protein. Here, we describe a construct for the optimized bacterial expression and purification of the MDM2 p53 binding domain. We found that the expression level of the soluble MDM2 p53 binding domain in bacteria was increased dramatically by fusing it to its interaction partner, the p53 transactivation peptide. Attachment of the p53 transactivation peptide (residues 17-29) to the N-terminus of MDM2 resulted in a more than 200-fold increase of soluble protein expression of the p53 binding domain in bacteria. To obtain the final MDM2 p53 binding domain (residues 5-109) we inserted a tobacco etch virus protease recognition site between the P53 peptide and the MDM2 p53 binding domain. To weaken the protein/peptide interaction and facilitate the separation of the protein from the complex, we introduced a point mutation of one of the key interaction residues (F19A or W23A) in the p53 peptide. The advantages of our new construct are high yield and easy purification of the MDM2 protein.     

Proteasome activator PA28 gamma regulates p53 by enhancing its MDM2-mediated degradation

Downregulation of p53 by MDM2-mediated proteasomal degradation makes cells resistant to apoptosis. The MDM2-p53 interaction is well characterized, but the mechanisms that regulate the interaction are not well understood. Here, we show that PA28gamma, a proteasome activator that inhibits apoptosis and promotes cell cycle progression through unknown mechanisms, exerts an effect as a cofactor in the MDM2-p53 interaction. The polymer form of PA28gamma interacts with both MDM2 and p53 proteins and facilitates their physical interaction. This promotes ubiquitination- and MDM2-dependent proteasomal degradation of p53, limiting its accumulation and resulting in inhibited apoptosis after DNA damage. Elimination of endogenous PA28gamma in human cancer cells abrogates MDM2-mediated p53 degradation, increases the activity of p53, and enhances apoptosis. These findings reveal the mechanism by which PA28gamma affects apoptosis and proliferation. Manipulation of the level of PA28gamma, an approach that would regulate the cellular content of p53, may improve the efficacy of current cancer therapies.     

The MDMX acidic domain competes with the p53 transactivation domain for MDM2 N-terminal domain binding

The tumor suppressor protein p53 governs many cellular pathways to control genome integrity, metabolic homeostasis, and cell viability. The critical roles of p53 highlight the importance of proper control over p53 in maintaining normal cellular function, with the negative regulators MDM2 and MDMX playing central roles in regulating p53 activity. The interaction between p53 and either MDM2 or MDMX involves the p53 transactivation domain (p53TD) and the N-terminal domains (NTD) of MDM2 or MDMX. Recently, the acidic domain (AD) of MDMX was found to bind to its own NTD, inhibiting the p53-MDMX interaction. Given the established structural and functional similarity between the MDM2 and MDMX NTDs, we hypothesized that the MDMX AD would also directly bind to MDM2 NTD to inhibit p53-MDM2 interaction. Through solution-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), we show that the MDMX AD can indeed directly interact with the MDM2 NTD and, as a result, can compete for p53 binding. The MDMX AD is thus able to serve as a regulatory domain to inhibit the MDM2-p53 interaction and may also play a direct role in p53 activation.     

MDM2 Inhibits Axin-Induced p53 Activation Independently of its E3 Ligase Activity

MDM2 plays a crucial role in negatively regulating the functions of tumor suppressor p53. Here we show that MDM2 can inhibit Axin-stimulated p53-dependent apoptosis by suppressing p53 phosphorylation at Ser 46 and apoptosis-related p53 transactivational activity. Interestingly, the ubiquitin E3 ligase activity of MDM2 is not required for this inhibitory effect. Mechanically, either wildtype MDM2 or its E3-dead mutant, disrupts the Axin-based HIPK2/p53 complex formation by blocking the binding of p53 and HIPK2 to Axin. MDM2Δp53, a deletion mutant that lacks p53 binding domain fails to exert the inhibitory effect, demonstrating that the interaction of MDM2 and p53, but not its E3 ligase activity toward p53 plays key role in suppressing Axin-stimulated p53 activation. Our results thus have revealed a novel aspect of the mechanism by which MDM2 regulates p53 activities.     

Dual-site regulation of MDM2 E3-ubiquitin ligase activity

The control of p53 ubiquitination by MDM2 provides a model system to define how an E3-ligase functions on a conformationally flexible substrate. The mechanism of MDM2-mediated ubiquitination of p53 has been analyzed by deconstructing, in vitro, the MDM2-dependent ubiquitination reaction. Surprisingly, ligands binding to the hydrophobic cleft of MDM2 do not inhibit its E3-ligase function. However, peptides from within the DNA binding domain of p53 that bind the acid domain of MDM2 inhibit ubiquitination of p53, localizing a motif that harbors a key ubiquitination signal. The binding of ligands to the N-terminal hydrophobic cleft of MDM2 reactivates, in vitro and in vivo, MDM2-catalyzed ubiquitination of p53F19A, a mutant p53 normally refractory to MDM2-catalyzed ubiquitination. We propose a model in which the interaction between the p53-BOX-I domain and the N terminus of MDM2 promotes conformational changes in MDM2 that stabilize acid-domain interactions with a ubiquitination signal in the DNA binding domain of the p53 tetramer.     

A spatiotemporal characterization of the effect of p53 phosphorylation on its interaction with MDM2

The interaction of p53 and MDM2 is modulated by the phosphorylation of p53. This mechanism is key to activating p53, yet its molecular determinants are not fully understood. To study the spatiotemporal characteristics of this molecular process we carried out Brownian dynamics simulations of the interactions of the MDM2 protein with a p53 peptide in its wild type state and when phosphorylated at Thr18 (pThr18) and Ser20 (pSer20). We found that p53 phosphorylation results in concerted changes in the topology of the interaction landscape in the diffusively bound encounter complex domain. These changes hinder phosphorylated p53 peptides from binding to MDM2 well before reaching the binding site. The underlying mechanism appears to involve shift of the peptide away from the vicinity of the MDM2 protein, peptide reorientation, and reduction in peptide residence time relative to wild-type p53 peptide. pThr18 and pSr20 p53 peptides experience reduction in residence times by factors of 13.6 and 37.5 respectively relative to the wild-type p53 peptide, indicating a greater role for Ser20 phosphorylation in abrogating p53 MDM2 interactions. These detailed insights into the effect of phosphorylation on molecular interactions are not available from conventional experimental and theoretical approaches and open up new avenues that incorporate molecular interaction dynamics, for stabilizing p53 against MDM2, which is a major focus of anticancer drug lead development.     

A spatiotemporal characterization of the effect of p53 phosphorylation on its interaction with MDM2

The interaction of p53 and MDM2 is modulated by the phosphorylation of p53. This mechanism is key to activating p53, yet its molecular determinants are not fully understood. To study the spatiotemporal characteristics of this molecular process we carried out Brownian dynamics simulations of the interactions of the MDM2 protein with a p53 peptide in its wild type state and when phosphorylated at Thr18 (pThr18) and Ser20 (pSer20). We found that p53 phosphorylation results in concerted changes in the topology of the interaction landscape in the diffusively bound encounter complex domain. These changes hinder phosphorylated p53 peptides from binding to MDM2 well before reaching the binding site. The underlying mechanism appears to involve shift of the peptide away from the vicinity of the MDM2 protein, peptide reorientation, and reduction in peptide residence time relative to wild-type p53 peptide. pThr18 and pSr20 p53 peptides experience reduction in residence times by factors of 13.6 and 37.5 respectively relative to the wild-type p53 peptide, indicating a greater role for Ser20 phosphorylation in abrogating p53 MDM2 interactions. These detailed insights into the effect of phosphorylation on molecular interactions are not available from conventional experimental and theoretical approaches and open up new avenues that incorporate molecular interaction dynamics, for stabilizing p53 against MDM2, which is a major focus of anticancer drug lead development.     

MDM2 splice variants predominantly localize to the nucleoplasm mediated by a COOH-terminal nuclear localization signal

Of the >40 alternative and aberrant splice variants of MDM2 that have been described to date, the majority has lost both the well-characterized nuclear localization signal (NLS1) and the nuclear export signal (NES) sequence. Because cellular localization of proteins provides insight regarding their potential function, we determined the localization of three different MDM2 splice variants. The splice variants chosen were the common variants MDM2-A and MDM2-B. In addition, MDM2-FB26 was chosen because it is one of the few variants described that contains the complete p53-binding site. All three splice variants predominantly localized to the nucleus. Nuclear localization of MDM2-A and MDM2-B was controlled by a previously uncharacterized nuclear localization signal (NLS2), whereas nucleoplasmic localization of MDM2-FB26 was mediated by NLS1. p53 and full-length MDM2 colocalized with the splice variants in the nucleus. MDM2-A and MDM2-B both contain a COOH-terminal RING finger domain, and interaction with full-length MDM2 through this domain was confirmed. MDM2-FB26 was the only splice variant evaluated that contained a p53-binding domain; however, interaction between MDM2-FB26 and p53 could not be shown. p14(ARF) did not colocalize with the splice variants and was predominantly expressed within the nucleoli. In summary, nuclear localization signals responsible for the nucleoplasmic distribution of MDM2 splice variants have been characterized. Colocalization and interaction of MDM2-A and MDM2-B with full-length MDM2 in the nucleus have important physiologic consequences, for example, deregulation of p53 activity.