Age and gender effects on bone mass density variation: finite elements simulation

Bone remodeling is a physiological process by which bone constantly adapts its structure to changes in long-term loading manifested by interactions between osteoclasts and osteoblasts. This process can be influenced by many local factors, via effects on bone cells differentiation and proliferation, which are produced by bone cells and act in a paracrine or autocrine way. The aim of the current work is to provide mechanobiological finite elements modeling coupling both cellular activities and mechanical behavior in order to investigate age and gender effects on bone remodeling evolution. A series of computational simulations have been performed on a 2D and 3D human proximal femur. An age- and gender-related impacts on bulk density alteration of trabecular bone have been noticed, and the major actors responsible of this phenomenon have been then discussed.     

Role of vascular endothelial cells in bone biology

Bone development and remodeling depend on complex interactions between bone-forming osteoblasts, bone-degrading osteoclasts, and other cells present within the bone microenvironment. Balanced control of bone formative and degradative processes is normally carefully maintained in the adult skeleton but becomes uncoupled in the course of aging or in various pathological disease states. Systemic regulators of bone metabolism and local mediators, including matrix molecules, cytokines, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and other autocrine or paracrine factors, regulate the recruitment, differentiation, and function of cells participating in bone formation and turnover. Although some of these interactions are now understood, many yet remain to be elucidated. Recent studies have begun exploring in detail how vascular endothelial cells and their products function in bone physiology. The findings are revealing that bone vascular endothelial cells may be members of a complex communication network in bone which operates between endothelial cells, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, macrophages, stromal cells, and perhaps other cell types found in bone as well. Therefore, multiple systemic and locally produced signals may be received, transduced, and integrated by individual cells and then propagated by the release from these cells of further signals targeted to other members of the bone cell network. In this manner, bone cell activities may be continuously coordinated to afford concerted actions and rapid responses to physiological changes. The bone microvasculature may play a pivotal role in these processes, both in linking circulatory and local signals with cells of the bone microenvironment and in actively contributing itself to the regulation of bone cell physiology. Thus, skeletal homeostasis and the coupling observed between bone resorption and bone formation during normal bone remodeling may be manifestations of this dynamic interactive communication network, operating via diverse signals not only between osteoblasts and osteoclasts but between many cell types residing within bone. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Osteoclast-osteoblast communication

Cells in osteoclast and osteoblast lineages communicate with each other through cell-cell contact, diffusible paracrine factors and cell-bone matrix interaction. Osteoclast-osteoblast communication occurs in a basic multicellular unit (BMU) at the initiation, transition and termination phases of bone remodeling. At the initiation phase, hematopoietic precursors are recruited to the BMU. These precursors express cell surface receptors including c-Fms, RANK and costimulatory molecules, such as osteoclast-associated receptor (OSCAR), and differentiate into osteoclasts following cell-cell contact with osteoblasts, which express ligands. Subsequently, the transition from bone resorption to formation is mediated by osteoclast-derived ‘coupling factors’, which direct the differentiation and activation of osteoblasts in resorbed lacunae to refill it with new bone. Bidirectional signaling generated by interaction between ephrinB2 on osteoclasts and EphB4 on osteoblast precursors facilitates the transition. Such interaction is likely to occur between osteoclasts and lining cells in the bone remodeling compartment (BRC). At the termination phase, bone remodeling is completed by osteoblastic bone formation and mineralization of bone matrix. Here, we describe molecular communication between osteoclasts and osteoblasts at distinct phases of bone remodeling.     

HtrA1 is upregulated during RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis,and negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation and BMP2-induced Smad1/5/8, ERK and p38 phosphorylation

Bone remodeling is regulated by secreted factors in the bone microenvironment. However, data regarding osteoclast-derived factors that influence osteoblast differentiation are lacking. Here, we show that HtrA1 is produced as a secreted protein during osteoclastogenesis, and negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation. Exogenous addition of recombinant HtrA1 attenuates osteoblast differentiation and BMP2-induced Smad1/5/8, ERK1/2 and p38 phosphorylation in pre-osteoblasts. Our studies imply a unique mode of crosstalk in which HtrA1 is produced by both osteoclasts and osteoblasts and negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation, suggesting that HtrA1 may mediate the fine tuning of paracrine and autocrine regulations during bone remodeling processes.     

Coupling factors and exosomal packaging microRNAs involved in the regulation of bone remodelling

Bone remodelling is a continuous process by which bone resorption by osteoclasts is followed by bone formation by osteoblasts to maintain skeletal homeostasis. These two forces must be tightly coordinated not only quantitatively, but also in time and space, and its malfunction leads to diseases such as osteoporosis. Recent research focusing on the cross‐talk and coupling mechanisms associated with the sequential recruitment of osteoblasts to areas where osteoclasts have removed bone matrix have identified a number of osteogenic factors produced by the osteoclasts themselves. Osteoclast‐derived factors and exosomal‐containing microRNA (miRNA) can either enhance or inhibit osteoblast differentiation through paracrine and juxtacrine mechanisms, and therefore may have a central coupling role in bone formation. Entwined with angiocrine factors released by vessel‐specific endothelial cells and perivascular cells or pericytes, these factors play a critical role in angiogenesis–osteogenesis coupling essential in bone remodelling.     

Lysophosphatidic acid: A potential mediator of osteoblast–osteoclast signaling in bone

Osteoclasts (bone resorbing cells) and osteoblasts (bone forming cells) play essential roles in skeletal development, mineral homeostasis and bone remodeling. The actions of these two cell types are tightly coordinated, and imbalances in bone formation and resorption can result in disease states, such as osteoporosis. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a potent bioactive phospholipid that influences a number of cellular processes, including proliferation, survival and migration. LPA is also involved in wound healing and pathological conditions, such as tumor metastasis and autoimmune disorders. During trauma, activated platelets are likely a source of LPA in bone. Physiologically, osteoblasts themselves can also produce LPA, which in turn promotes osteogenesis. The capacity for local production of LPA, coupled with the proximity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, leads to the intriguing possibility that LPA acts as a paracrine mediator of osteoblast–osteoclast signaling. Here we summarize emerging evidence that LPA enhances the differentiation of osteoclast precursors, and regulates the morphology, resorptive activity and survival of mature osteoclasts. These actions arise through stimulation of multiple LPA receptors and intracellular signaling pathways. Moreover, LPA is a potent mitogen implicated in promoting the metastasis of breast and ovarian tumors to bone. Thus, LPA released from osteoblasts is potentially an important autocrine and paracrine mediator — physiologically regulating skeletal development and remodeling, while contributing pathologically to metastatic bone disease. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Advances in Lysophospholipid Research.     

RANKL与骨重建

骨是一种动态更新的组织,它不断进行骨吸收（bone resorption）与骨形成（bone formation）的平衡,这个过程称之为骨重建（bone remodeling）．核因子κB受体活化因子配体（receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand,RANKL）是骨吸收和骨形成耦联的关键,具有诱导破骨细胞（osteoclast, OC）生成、活化,抑制破骨细胞凋亡的作用．RANKL最初发现于活化的T细胞,但骨重建过程中RANKL主要来源于骨细胞、成骨细胞和骨髓基质细胞．RANKL/核因子κB受体活化因子（receptor activator of nuclear factor κB,RANK）/骨保护素（osteoprotegerin, OPG）信号通路在成骨细胞调控破骨细胞生成的过程中起着重要的调节作用,是维持骨重建平衡的关键．本文就RANKL及其在骨中的分子作用机制作一综述.     

TNAP, TrAP, ecto-purinergic signaling, and bone remodeling

Bone remodeling is a process of continuous resorption and formation/mineralization carried out by osteoclasts and osteoblasts, which, along with osteocytes, comprise the bone multicellular unit (BMU). A key component of the BMU is the bone remodeling compartment (BRC), isolated from the marrow by a canopy of osteoblast-like lining cells. Although much progress has been made regarding the cytokine-dependent and hormonal regulation of bone remodeling, less attention has been placed on the role of extracellular pH (pH(e)). Osteoclastic bone resorption occurs at acidic pH(e). Furthermore, osteoclasts can be regarded as epithelial-like cells, due to their polarized structure and ability to form a seal against bone, isolating the lacunar space. The major ecto-phosphatases of osteoclasts and osteoblasts, acid and alkaline phosphatases, both have ATPase activity with pH optima several units different from neutrality. Furthermore, osteoclasts and osteoblasts express plasma membrane purinergic P2 receptors that, upon activation by ATP, accelerate bone osteoclast resorption and impair osteoblast mineralization. We hypothesize that these ecto-phosphatases help regulate [ATP](e) and localized pH(e) at the sites of bone resorption and mineralization by pH-dependent ATP hydrolysis coupled with P2Y-dependent regulation of osteoclast and osteoblast function. Furthermore, osteoclast cellular HCO3(-), formed as a product of lacunar V-ATPase H(+) secretion, is secreted into the BRC, which could elevate BRC pH(e), in turn affecting osteoblast function. We will review the existing data addressing regulation of BRC pH(e), present a hypothesis regarding its regulation, and discuss the hypothesis in the context of the function of proteins that regulate pH(e).     

Short-range intercellular calcium signaling in bone

The regulation of bone turnover is a complex and finely tuned process. Many factors regulate bone remodeling, including hormones, growth factors, cytokines etc. However, little is known about the signals coupling bone formation to bone resorption, and how mechanical forces are translated into biological effects in bone. Intercellular calcium waves are increases in intracellular calcium concentration in single cells, subsequently propagating to adjacent cells, and can be a possible mechanism for the coupling of bone formation to bone resorption. The aim of the present studies was to investigate whether bone cells are capable of communicating via intercellular calcium signals, and determine by which mechanisms the cells propagate the signals. First, we found that osteoblastic cells can propagate intercellular calcium transients upon mechanical stimulation, and that there are two principally different mechanisms for this propagation. One mechanism involves the secretion of a nucleotide, possibly ATP, acting in an autocrine action to purinergic P2Y2 receptors on the neighboring cells, leading to intracellular IP3 generation and subsequent release of calcium from intracellular stores. The other mechanism involves the passage of a small messenger through gap junctions to the cytoplasm of the neighboring cells, inducing depolarization of the plasma membrane with subsequent opening of membrane bound voltage-operated calcium channels. Next, we found that osteoblasts can propagate these signals to osteoclasts as well. We demonstrated that paracrine action of ATP was responsible for the wave propagation, but now the purinergic P2X7 receptor was involved. Thus, the studies demonstrate that calcium signals can be propagated not only among osteoblasts, but also between osteoblasts and osteoclasts in response to mechanical stimulation. Thus, intercellular calcium signaling can be a mechanism by which mechanical stimuli on bone are translated into biological signals in bone cells, and propagated through the network of cells in bone. Further, the observations offer new pharmacological targets for the modulation of bone turnover, and perhaps even for the treatment of bone metabolic disorders.     

Membrane trafficking in osteoblasts and osteoclasts: new avenues for understanding and treating skeletal diseases

The endocytic and exocytic/secretory pathways are two major intracellular membrane trafficking routes that regulate numerous cellular functions in a variety of cell types. Osteoblasts and osteoclasts, two major bone cells responsible for bone remodeling and homeostasis, are no exceptions. During the past few years, emerging evidence has pinpointed a critical role for endocytic and secretory pathways in osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation and function. The endosomal membrane provides a platform to integrate bone tropic signals of hormones and growth factors in osteoblasts. In osteoclasts, endocytosis, followed by transcytosis, of degraded bone matrix promotes bone resorption. Secretory pathways, especially lysosome secretion, not only participate in bone matrix deposition by osteoblasts and degradation of mineralized bone matrix by osteoclasts; they may also be involved in the coupling of bone resorption and bone formation during bone remodeling. More importantly, mutations in genes encoding regulatory factors within the endocytic and secretory pathways have been identified as causes for bone diseases. Identification of the molecular mechanisms of these genes in bone cells may provide new therapeutic targets for skeletal disorders.     

Cell-cell interactions in regulating osteogenesis and osteoblast function

Endochondral bone formation requires an elaborate interplay among autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine signals, positional cues, and cell-cell contacts to mediate the complex three-dimensional architecture and function of the skeleton. Embryonic bone development occurs by migration, aggregation, and condensation of immature mesenchymal progenitor cells to form the cartilaginous anlage. Upon vascular invasion, the cartilaginous scaffold is colonized and subsequently mineralized by osteoblasts. Likewise, bone remodeling in the adult skeleton is a dynamic process that requires coordinated cellular activities among osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts to maintain bone homeostasis. This review examines the role of cell-cell interactions mediated by adherens junctions formed by cadherins and communicative gap junctions formed by connexins in regulating bone development and osteogenic function.     

Synaptotagmin VII regulates bone remodeling by modulating osteoclast and osteoblast secretion

Maintenance of bone mass and integrity requires a tight balance between resorption by osteoclasts and formation by osteoblasts. Exocytosis of functional proteins is a prerequisite for the activity of both cells. In the present study, we show that synaptotagmin VII, a calcium sensor protein that regulates exocytosis, is associated with lysosomes in osteoclasts and bone matrix protein-containing vesicles in osteoblasts. Absence of synaptotagmin VII inhibits cathepsin K secretion and formation of the ruffled border in osteoclasts and bone matrix protein deposition in osteoblasts, without affecting the differentiation of either cell. Reflecting these in vitro findings, synaptotagmin VII-deficient mice are osteopenic due to impaired bone resorption and formation. Therefore, synaptotagmin VII plays an important role in bone remodeling and homeostasis by modulating secretory pathways functionally important in osteoclasts and osteoblasts.     

Osteoblastic Responses to TGF-β during Bone Remodeling

Bone remodeling depends on the spatial and temporal coupling of bone formation by osteoblasts and bone resorption by osteoclasts; however, the molecular basis of these inductive interactions is unknown. We have previously shown that osteoblastic overexpression of TGF-β2 in transgenic mice deregulates bone remodeling and leads to an age-dependent loss of bone mass that resembles high-turnover osteoporosis in humans. This phenotype implicates TGF-β2 as a physiological regulator of bone remodeling and raises the question of how this single secreted factor regulates the functions of osteoblasts and osteoclasts and coordinates their opposing activities in vivo. To gain insight into the physiological role of TGF-β in bone remodeling, we have now characterized the responses of osteoblasts to TGF-β in these transgenic mice. We took advantage of the ability of alendronate to specifically inhibit bone resorption, the lack of osteoclast activity in c-fos^−/− mice, and a new transgenic mouse line that expresses a dominant-negative form of the type II TGF-β receptor in osteoblasts. Our results show that TGF-β directly increases the steady-state rate of osteoblastic differentiation from osteoprogenitor cell to terminally differentiated osteocyte and thereby increases the final density of osteocytes embedded within bone matrix. Mice overexpressing TGF-β2 also have increased rates of bone matrix formation; however, this activity does not result from a direct effect of TGF-β on osteoblasts, but is more likely a homeostatic response to the increase in bone resorption caused by TGF-β. Lastly, we find that osteoclastic activity contributes to the TGF-β–induced increase in osteoblast differentiation at sites of bone resorption. These results suggest that TGF-β is a physiological regulator of osteoblast differentiation and acts as a central component of the coupling of bone formation to resorption during bone remodeling.     

Do Epigenetic Marks Govern Bone Mass and Homeostasis?

Bone is a specialized connective tissue with a calcified extracellular matrix in which cells are embedded. Besides providing the internal support of the body and protection for vital organs, bone also has several important metabolic functions, especially in mineral homeostasis. Far from being a passive tissue, it is continuously being resorbed and formed again throughout life, by a process known as bone remodeling.Bone development and remodeling are influenced by many factors, some of which may be modifiable in the early steps of life. Several studies have shown that environmental factors in uterus and in infancy may modify the skeletal growth pattern, influencing the risk of bone disease in later life. On the other hand, bone remodeling is a highly orchestrated multicellular process that requires the sequential and balanced events of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and osteoblast-mediated bone formation. These processes are accompanied by specific gene expression patterns which are responsible for the differentiation of the mesenchymal and hematopoietic precursors of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, respectively, and the activity of differentiated bone cells. This review summarizes the current understanding of how epigenetic mechanisms influence these processes and their possible role in common skeletal diseases.     

A supra-cellular model for coupling of bone resorption to formation during remodeling: lessons from two bone resorption inhibitors affecting bone formation differently

The bone matrix is maintained functional through the combined action of bone resorbing osteoclasts and bone forming osteoblasts, in so-called bone remodeling units. The coupling of these two activities is critical for securing bone replenishment and involves osteogenic factors released by the osteoclasts. However, the osteoclasts are separated from the mature bone forming osteoblasts in time and space. Therefore the target cell of these osteoclastic factors has remained unknown. Recent explorations of the physical microenvironment of osteoclasts revealed a cell layer lining the bone marrow and forming a canopy over the whole remodeling surface, spanning from the osteoclasts to the bone forming osteoblasts. Several observations show that these canopy cells are a source of osteoblast progenitors, and we hypothesized therefore that they are the likely cells targeted by the osteogenic factors of the osteoclasts. Here we provide evidence supporting this hypothesis, by comparing the osteoclast-canopy interface in response to two types of bone resorption inhibitors in rabbit lumbar vertebrae. The bisphosphonate alendronate, an inhibitor leading to low bone formation levels, reduces the extent of canopy coverage above osteoclasts. This effect is in accordance with its toxic action on periosteoclastic cells. In contrast, odanacatib, an inhibitor preserving bone formation, increases the extent of the osteoclast-canopy interface. Interestingly, these distinct effects correlate with how fast bone formation follows resorption during these respective treatments. Furthermore, canopy cells exhibit uPARAP/Endo180, a receptor able to bind the collagen made available by osteoclasts, and reported to mediate osteoblast recruitment. Overall these observations support a mechanism where the recruitment of bone forming osteoblasts from the canopy is induced by osteoclastic factors, thereby favoring initiation of bone formation. They lead to a model where the osteoclast-canopy interface is the physical site where coupling of bone resorption to bone formation occurs.     

Identification of osteopontin in isolated rabbit osteoclasts.

Bone remodeling is a complex process coupling bone formation and resorption. Osteoblasts, the bone-forming cells, are known to produce various bone matrix proteins and cytokines; however, little is known about protein factors produced by osteoclasts or bone-resorbing cells. A method utilizing the high affinity of osteoclasts for tissue culture dishes was developed to isolate a large number of pure osteoclasts from rabbit long bones. A cDNA library was then constructed from these isolated osteoclasts, and differential cDNA screening was performed between osteoclasts and spleen cells. Two clones representing osteoclast-specific clones, named OC-1 and OC-2, were isolated. By Northern blot analysis, OC-1 was expressed in osteoclasts and in kidneys, whereas OC-2 was specific for osteoclasts. OC-1 was found to encode osteopontin from its nucleotide sequence, and therefore, osteopontin may have other functions for osteoclastic bone resorption besides osteoclast attachment to bone.     

The mechanism of transduction of mechanical strains into biological signals at the bone cellular level

As appears from the literature, the majority of bone researchers consider osteoblasts and osteoclasts the only very important bony cells. In the present report we provide evidence, based on personal morphofunctional investigations, that such a view is incorrect and misleading. Indeed osteoblasts and osteoclasts undoubtedly are the only bone forming and bone reabsorbing cells, but they are transient cells, thus they cannot be the first to be involved in sensing both mechanical and non-mechanical agents which control bone modeling and remodeling processes. Briefly, according to our view, osteoblasts and osteoclasts represent the arms of a worker; the actual operation center is constituted by the cells of the osteogenic lineage in the resting state. Such a resting phase is characterized by osteocytes, bone lining cells and stromal cells, all connected in a functional syncytium by gap junctions, which extends from the bone to the vessels. We named this syncytium the Bone Basic Cellular System (BBCS), because it represents the only permanent cellular background capable first of sensing mechanical strains and biochemical factors and then of triggering and driving both processes of bone formation and bone resorption. As shown by our studies, signalling throughout BBCS can occur by volume transmission (VT) and/or wiring transmission (WT). VT corresponds to the routes followed by soluble substances (hormones, cytokines etc.), whereas WT represents the diffusion of ionic currents along cytoplasmic processes in a neuron-like manner. It is likely that non-mechanical agents first affect stromal cells and diffuse by VT to reach the other cells of BBCS, whereas mechanical agents are first sensed by osteocytes and then issued throughout     

The role of nervous system in adaptive response of bone to mechanical loading

Bone tissue is remodeled through the catabolic function of the osteoclasts and the anabolic function of the osteoblasts. The process of bone homeostasis and metabolism has been identified to be co-ordinated with several local and systemic factors, of which mechanical stimulation acts as an important regulator. Very recent studies have shown a mutual effect between bone and other organs, which means bone influences the activity of other organs and is also influenced by other organs and systems of the body, especially the nervous system. With the discovery of neuropeptide (calcitonin gene-related peptide, vasoactive intestinal peptide, substance P, and neuropeptide Y) and neurotransmitter in bone and the adrenergic receptor observed in osteoclasts and osteoblasts, the function of peripheral nervous system including sympathetic and sensor nerves in bone resorption and its reaction to on osteoclasts and osteoblasts under mechanical stimulus cannot be ignored. Taken together, bone tissue is not only the mechanical transmitter, but as well the receptor of neural system under mechanical loading. This review aims to summarize the relationship among bone, nervous system, and mechanotransduction.