A Single Amino Acid Substitution in the Capsid of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Can Increase Acid Lability and Confer Resistance to Acid-Dependent Uncoating Inhibition

The acid-dependent disassembly of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is required for viral RNA release from endosomes to initiate replication. Although the FMDV capsid disassembles at acid pH, mutants escaping inhibition by NH₄Cl of endosomal acidification were found to constitute about 10% of the viruses recovered from BHK-21 cells infected with FMDV C-S8c1. For three of these mutants, the degree of NH₄Cl resistance correlated with the sensitivity of the virion to acid-induced inactivation of its infectivity. Capsid sequencing revealed the presence in each of these mutants of a different amino acid substitution (VP3 A123T, VP3 A118V, and VP2 D106G) that affected a highly conserved residue among FMDVs located close to the capsid interpentameric interfaces. These residues may be involved in the modulation of the acid-induced dissociation of the FMDV capsid. The substitution VP3 A118V present in mutant c2 was sufficient to confer full resistance to NH₄Cl and concanamycin A (a V-ATPase inhibitor that blocks endosomal acidification) as well as to increase the acid sensitivity of the virion to an extent similar to that exhibited by mutant c2 relative to the sensitivity of the parental virus C-S8c1. In addition, the increased propensity to dissociation into pentameric subunits of virions bearing substitution VP3 A118V indicates that this replacement also facilitates the dissociation of the FMDV capsid.Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is a member of the Aphthovirus genus in the family Picornaviridae. FMDV displays epithelial tropism and is responsible for a highly contagious disease of cloven-hoofed animals (23, 60). FMDV populations are quasispecies and exhibit a high potential for variation and adaptation, one consequence of which is the extensive antigenic diversity of this virus, reflected in the existence of seven serotypes and multiple antigenic variants (reviewed in references 17 and 60). Different cellular receptors, including α_vβ integrins and heparan sulfate (HS) glycosaminoglycans, have been described for natural isolates and tissue culture-adapted FMDVs (3, 4, 6, 28-31, 56). However, viruses that are infectious in vivo use integrins as receptors (28). The interaction between FMDV and the integrin molecule is mediated by an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) triplet located at the G-H loop of capsid protein VP1 (9, 47). FMDV isolates interacting with integrins gain entry into the cell following clathrin-mediated endocytosis (8, 39, 52). On the other hand, it has been described that a genetically engineered HS-binding mutant uses caveolae to enter into cultured cells (51). After internalization, FMDV must release its genomic RNA molecule of positive polarity into the host cell cytoplasm to establish a productive infection. Early work showed that a variety of lysosomotropic agents, such as weak bases and ionophores that block acidification of endosomes, inhibit FMDV infection (5, 11-13), indicating that genome release is dependent on endosomal acidification. In addition, internalized FMDV particles colocalize with markers from early and recycling endosomes (8, 51, 52) and FMDV infection is reduced by expression of a dominant negative mutant of Rab5 (33), suggesting that FMDV may release its genome from these compartments.The FMDV capsid comprises 60 copies of each of the four structural proteins (VP1 to VP4) arranged in an icosahedral lattice of 12 pentameric subunits. FMDV particles are highly acid labile and disassemble at pH values slightly below neutrality (13). Acid lability is not a feature of the capsids of other picornaviruses, such as Enterovirus. Pentameric subunits are intermediates of FMDV assembly and disassembly (64). A high density of His residues is found close to the interpentameric interface. Protonation of these residues at the acidic pH in the endosomes has been proposed to trigger acid-induced capsid disassembly by electrostatic repulsion between the protonated His side chains (1). His 142 (H142) in VP3 of type A FMDV is involved in a His-α-helix dipole interaction, which is likely to influence the acid lability of FMDV (13). In silico predictions suggested that H142 and H145 in VP3 may have the greatest effect on this process (63). Experimental evidence of the involvement of H142 of VP3 in acid-induced disassembly of FMDV has also been reported (20). Concomitantly with capsid disassembly into pentameric intermediates, internal protein VP4 and viral RNA are released. VP4 is a highly hydrophobic and myristoylated protein (7) whose release has been suggested to mediate membrane permeabilization and ion channel formation, thus facilitating the endosomal exit of viral RNA (15, 16, 34).Besides providing information about the endosomal pH requirements for the release of virus genomes, drugs modifying endosomal acidification can reveal the molecular changes associated with viral resistance to their action. These analyses may also address whether the balance between acid lability and capsid stability required for completion of virus replication allows FMDV, which disassembles at a pH close to neutrality, to escape inhibition by drugs raising the endosomal pH. In this work, we have isolated and characterized FMDV mutants that are able to escape from the inhibition of endosomal acidification exerted by NH₄Cl, a lysosomotropic weak base that raises endolysosomal pH and impairs uncoating and infection of viruses that require transit through acidic endosomal compartments for penetration (5, 26, 53). These mutants showed an increased acid lability, which is likely to allow them to uncoat at more-alkaline pH values. A single amino acid substitution close to the interpentameric interfaces in the capsid of one of these mutants was responsible for a total resistance to the elevation in endosomal pH caused by NH₄Cl treatment and for the acid-labile phenotype.     

HIV-1 gp120 Determinants Proximal to the CD4 Binding Site Shift Protective Glycans That Are Targeted by Monoclonal Antibody 2G12

HIV-1 R5 envelopes vary considerably in their capacities to exploit low CD4 levels on macrophages for infection and in their sensitivities to the CD4 binding site (CD4bs) monoclonal antibody (MAb) b12 and the glycan-specific MAb 2G12. Here, we show that nonglycan determinants flanking the CD4 binding loop, which affect exposure of the CD4bs, also modulate 2G12 neutralization. Our data indicate that such residues act via a mechanism that involves shifts in the orientation of proximal glycans, thus modulating the sensitivity of 2G12 neutralization and affecting the overall presentation and structure of the glycan shield.The trimeric envelope (Env) spikes on HIV-1 virions are comprised of gp120 and gp41 heterodimers. gp120 is coated extensively with glycans (9, 11, 15) that are believed to protect the envelope from neutralizing antibodies. The extents and locations of glycosylation are variable and evolving (15). Thus, while some glycans are conserved, others appear or disappear in a host over the course of infection. Such changes may result in exposure or protection of functional envelope sites and can result from selection by different environmental pressures in vivo, including neutralizing antibodies.We previously reported that HIV-1 R5 envelopes varied considerably in tropism and neutralization sensitivity (3, 4, 12-14). We showed that highly macrophage-tropic R5 envelopes were more frequently detected in brain than in semen, blood, and lymph node (LN) samples (12, 14). The capacity of R5 envelopes to infect macrophages correlated with their ability to exploit low levels of cell surface CD4 for infection (12, 14). Determinants within and proximal to the CD4 binding site (CD4bs) were shown to modulate macrophage infectivity (3, 4, 5, 12, 13) and presumably acted by altering the avidity of the trimer for cell surface CD4. These determinants include residues proximal to the CD4 binding loop, which is likely the first part of the CD4bs contacted by CD4 (1). We also observed that macrophage-tropic R5 envelopes were frequently more resistant to the glycan-specific monoclonal antibody (MAb) 2G12 than were non-macrophage-tropic R5 Envs (13).Here, we investigated the envelope determinants of 2G12 sensitivity by using two HIV-1 envelopes that we used previously to map macrophage tropism determinants (4), B33 from brain and LN40 from lymph node tissue of an AIDS patient with neurological complications. While B33 imparts high levels of macrophage infectivity and is resistant to 2G12, LN40 Env confers very inefficient macrophage infection and is 2G12 sensitive (12-14).     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Prophylactic Treatment with a G Glycoprotein Monoclonal Antibody Reduces Pulmonary Inflammation in Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)-Challenged Na?ve and Formalin-Inactivated RSV-Immunized BALB/c Mice

We examined whether prophylactically administered anti-respiratory syncytial virus (anti-RSV) G monoclonal antibody (MAb) would decrease the pulmonary inflammation associated with primary RSV infection and formalin-inactivated RSV (FI-RSV)-enhanced disease in mice. MAb 131-2G administration 1 day prior to primary infection reduced the pulmonary inflammatory response and the level of RSV replication. Further, intact or F(ab′)₂ forms of MAb 131-2G administered 1 day prior to infection in FI-RSV-vaccinated mice reduced enhanced inflammation and disease. This study shows that an anti-RSV G protein MAb might provide prophylaxis against both primary infection and FI-RSV-associated enhanced disease. It is possible that antibodies with similar reactivities might prevent enhanced disease and improve the safety of nonlive virus vaccines.Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in infants and young children causes substantial bronchiolitis and pneumonia (11, 27, 28, 40) resulting in 40,000 to 125,000 hospitalizations in the United States each year (27). RSV is also a prominent cause of respiratory illness in older children; those of any age with compromised cardiac, pulmonary, or immune systems; and the elderly (6, 7, 11, 17, 18, 39). Despite extensive efforts toward vaccine development (3, 5, 8, 20, 30, 38), none is yet available. Currently, only preventive measures are available that focus on infection control to decrease transmission and prophylactic administration of a humanized IgG monoclonal antibody (MAb) directed against the F protein of RSV (palivizumab) that is recommended for high-risk infants and young children (4, 7, 17). To date, no treatment has been highly effective for active RSV infection (17, 21).The first candidate vaccine, a formalin-inactivated RSV (FI-RSV) vaccine developed in the 1960s, not only failed to protect against disease but led to severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection in young vaccine recipients upon subsequent natural infection (8, 16). The experience with FI-RSV has limited nonlive RSV vaccine development for the RSV-naïve infant and young child. Understanding the factors contributing to disease pathogenesis and FI-RSV vaccine-enhanced disease may identify ways to prevent such a response and to help achieve a safe and effective vaccine.The RSV G, or attachment, protein has been implicated in the pathogenesis of disease after primary infection and FI-RSV-enhanced disease (2, 26, 31). The central conserved region of the G protein contains four evolutionarily conserved cysteines in a cysteine noose structure, within which lies a CX3C chemokine motif (9, 29, 34). The G protein CX3C motif is also immunoactive, as suggested by studies with the mouse model that show that G protein CX3C motif interaction with CX3CR1 alters pulmonary inflammation (41), RSV-specific T-cell responses (12), FI-RSV vaccine-enhanced disease, and expression of the neurokinin substance P (14) and also depresses respiratory rates (32). Recent studies demonstrated that therapeutic treatment with a murine anti-RSV G protein monoclonal antibody (MAb 131-2G) which blocks binding to CX3CR1 can reduce pulmonary inflammation associated with primary infection (13, 23). These findings led us to hypothesize that prophylactic administration of this anti-RSV G monoclonal antibody may also diminish pulmonary inflammation associated with RSV infection in naïve and in FI-RSV-vaccinated mice. In this study, we evaluate the impact of prophylactic administration of MAb 131-2G on the pulmonary inflammatory response to primary infection and to RSV challenge following FI-RSV immunization in mice.     

Previously Unrecognized Amino Acid Substitutions in the Hemagglutinin and Fusion Proteins of Measles Virus Modulate Cell-Cell Fusion,Hemadsorption, Virus Growth,and Penetration Rate

Wild-type measles virus (MV) isolated in B95a cells could be adapted to Vero cells after several blind passages. In this study, we have determined the complete nucleotide sequences of the genomes of the wild type (T11wild) and its Vero cell-adapted (T11Ve-23) MV strain and identified amino acid substitutions R516G, E271K, D439E and G464W (D439E/G464W), N481Y/H495R, and Y187H/L204F in the nucleocapsid, V, fusion (F), hemagglutinin (H), and large proteins, respectively. Expression of mutated H and F proteins from cDNA revealed that the H495R substitution, in addition to N481Y, in the H protein was necessary for the wild-type H protein to use CD46 efficiently as a receptor and that the G464W substitution in the F protein was important for enhanced cell-cell fusion. Recombinant wild-type MV strains harboring the F protein with the mutations D439E/G464W [F(D439E/G464W)] and/or H(N481Y/H495R) protein revealed that both mutated F and H proteins were required for efficient syncytium formation and virus growth in Vero cells. Interestingly, a recombinant wild-type MV strain harboring the H(N481Y/H495R) protein penetrated slowly into Vero cells, while a recombinant wild-type MV strain harboring both the F(D439E/G464W) and H(N481Y/H495R) proteins penetrated efficiently into Vero cells, indicating that the F(D439E/G464W) protein compensates for the inefficient penetration of a wild-type MV strain harboring the H(N481Y/H495R) protein. Thus, the F and H proteins synergistically function to ensure efficient wild-type MV growth in Vero cells.Measles virus (MV), which belongs to the genus Morbillivirus in the family Paramyxoviridae, is an enveloped virus with a nonsegmented negative-strand RNA genome. The MV genome encodes six structural proteins: the nucleocapsid (N), phosphoprotein (P), matrix (M), fusion (F), hemagglutinin (H), and large (L) proteins. The P gene also encodes two other accessory proteins, the C and V proteins. The C protein is translated from an alternative translational initiation site leading a different reading frame, and the V protein is synthesized from an edited mRNA. MV has two envelope glycoproteins, the F and H proteins. The former is responsible for envelope fusion, and the latter is responsible for receptor binding (12).Wild-type MV strains isolated in B95a cells and laboratory-adapted MV strains have distinct phenotypes (18). Wild-type MV strains can grow in B95a cells but not in Vero cells, while laboratory-adapted MV strains can grow in both B95a and Vero cells. Wild-type MV strains do not cause hemadsorption (HAd) in African green monkey red blood cells (AGM-RBC), while most of laboratory-adapted MV strains cause HAd. Importantly, wild-type MV strains are pathogenic and induce clinical signs that resemble human measles in experimentally infected monkeys while laboratory-adapted MV strains do not.One approach to identify amino acid substitutions responsible for these phenotypic differences is the comparison of a wild-type MV strain with a standard laboratory-adapted MV strain such as the Edmonston strain. With regard to the H protein, amino acid substitutions important for HAd activity and cell-cell fusion in tissue culture cells were identified by expressing the H proteins in mammalian cells (15, 21). Recently, Tahara et al. revealed that the M, H, and L proteins are responsible for efficient growth in Vero cells by constructing a series of recombinant viruses in which part of the genome of the wild-type MV was replaced with the corresponding sequences of the Edmonston strain (45, 46, 47).Another approach is the comparison of wild-type MV strains with their Vero cell-adapted MV strains. It was reported that Vero cell-adapted MV strains could be obtained by successive blind passages of wild-type MV strains in Vero cells (18, 24, 30, 43). Interestingly, in vivo and in vitro phenotypes of Vero cell-adapted MV strains were similar to those of laboratory-adapted standard MV strains (18, 19, 24, 30, 43). Comparison of the complete nucleotide sequences of the genomes of wild-type MV strains with those of Vero cell-adapted wild-type MV strains revealed amino acid substitutions in the P, C, V, M, H, and L proteins (27, 42, 48, 53).At present, these phenotypic differences are explained mainly by the receptor usage of MV. Wild-type MV strains can use signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM; also called CD150) but not CD46 as a cellular receptor, whereas laboratory-adapted MV strains can use both SLAM and CD46 as cellular receptors (7, 10, 16, 29, 56, 60).However, receptor usage per se cannot explain all of the phenotypic differences (20, 25, 48, 53). For example, recombinant Edmonston strains expressing wild-type H proteins can grow in Vero cells to some extent (17, 54). Several reports suggested the presence of the third MV receptor on Vero cells (14, 44, 54, 60). Other reports indicated the contribution of the M protein on cell-cell fusion and growth of MV in Vero cells (4, 27, 47). Recently, the unidentified epithelial cell receptor for MV was predicted in primary culture of human cells (1, 55) and several epithelial cell lines (23, 51). However, the identity of the third receptor on Vero cells and the unidentified epithelial cell receptor is not clear yet. Thus, the mechanism of Vero cell adaptation of wild-type MV is not completely understood.In order to understand the molecular mechanism of these phenotypic changes of wild-type MV strains during adaptation in Vero cells, we determined the complete nucleotide sequences of the genomes of the wild-type (T11wild) and its Vero cell-adapted (T11Ve-23) MV strains (43) and examined the effect of individual amino acid substitutions using a mammalian cell expression system and reverse genetics. We show here that previously unrecognized new amino acid substitutions in the H and F proteins are important for MV adaptation and HAd activity.     

Pathogenic Hantaviruses Andes Virus and Hantaan Virus Induce Adherens Junction Disassembly by Directing Vascular Endothelial Cadherin Internalization in Human Endothelial Cells

Hantaviruses infect endothelial cells and cause 2 vascular permeability-based diseases. Pathogenic hantaviruses enhance the permeability of endothelial cells in response to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). However, the mechanism by which hantaviruses hyperpermeabilize endothelial cells has not been defined. The paracellular permeability of endothelial cells is uniquely determined by the homophilic assembly of vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin) within adherens junctions, which is regulated by VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR2) responses. Here, we investigated VEGFR2 phosphorylation and the internalization of VE-cadherin within endothelial cells infected by pathogenic Andes virus (ANDV) and Hantaan virus (HTNV) and nonpathogenic Tula virus (TULV) hantaviruses. We found that VEGF addition to ANDV- and HTNV-infected endothelial cells results in the hyperphosphorylation of VEGFR2, while TULV infection failed to increase VEGFR2 phosphorylation. Concomitant with the VEGFR2 hyperphosphorylation, VE-cadherin was internalized to intracellular vesicles within ANDV- or HTNV-, but not TULV-, infected endothelial cells. Addition of angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) or sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) to ANDV- or HTNV-infected cells blocked VE-cadherin internalization in response to VEGF. These findings are consistent with the ability of Ang-1 and S1P to inhibit hantavirus-induced endothelial cell permeability. Our results suggest that pathogenic hantaviruses disrupt fluid barrier properties of endothelial cell adherens junctions by enhancing VEGFR2-VE-cadherin pathway responses which increase paracellular permeability. These results provide a pathway-specific mechanism for the enhanced permeability of hantavirus-infected endothelial cells and suggest that stabilizing VE-cadherin within adherens junctions is a primary target for regulating endothelial cell permeability during pathogenic hantavirus infection.Hantaviruses cause 2 human diseases: hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) (50). HPS and HFRS are multifactorial in nature and cause thrombocytopenia, immune and endothelial cell responses, and hypoxia, which contribute to disease (7, 11, 31, 42, 62). Although these syndromes sound quite different, they share common components which involve the ability of hantaviruses to infect endothelial cells and induce capillary permeability. Edema, which results from capillary leakage of fluid into tissues and organs, is a common finding in both HPS and HFRS patients (4, 7, 11, 31, 42, 62). In fact, both diseases can present with renal or pulmonary sequelae, and the renal or pulmonary focus of hantavirus diseases is likely to result from hantavirus infection of endothelial cells within vast glomerular and pulmonary capillary beds (4, 7, 11, 31, 42, 62). All hantaviruses predominantly infect endothelial cells which line capillaries (31, 42, 44, 61, 62), and endothelial cells have a primary role in maintaining fluid barrier functions of the vasculature (1, 12, 55). Although hantaviruses do not lyse endothelial cells (44, 61), this primary cellular target underlies hantavirus-induced changes in capillary integrity. As a result, understanding altered endothelial cell responses following hantavirus infection is fundamental to defining the mechanism of permeability induced by pathogenic hantaviruses (1, 12, 55).Pathogenic, but not nonpathogenic, hantaviruses use β₃ integrins on the surface of endothelial cells and platelets for attachment (19, 21, 23, 39, 46), and β₃ integrins play prominent roles in regulating vascular integrity (3, 6, 8, 24, 48). Pathogenic hantaviruses bind to basal, inactive conformations of β₃ integrins (35, 46, 53) and days after infection inhibit β₃ integrin-directed endothelial cell migration (20, 46). This may be the result of cell-associated virus (19, 20, 22) which keeps β₃ in an inactive state but could also occur through additional regulatory processes that have yet to be defined. Interestingly, the nonpathogenic hantaviruses Prospect Hill virus (PHV) and Tula virus (TULV) fail to alter β₃ integrin functions, and their entry is consistent with the use of discrete α₅β₁ integrins (21, 23, 36).On endothelial cells, α_vβ₃ integrins normally regulate permeabilizing effects of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2) (3, 24, 48, 51). VEGF was initially identified as an edema-causing vascular permeability factor (VPF) that is 50,000 times more potent than histamine in directing fluid across capillaries (12, 14). VEGF is responsible for disassembling adherens junctions between endothelial cells to permit cellular movement, wound repair, and angiogenesis (8, 10, 12, 13, 17, 26, 57). Extracellular domains of β₃ integrins and VEGFR2 reportedly form a coprecipitable complex (3), and knocking out β₃ causes capillary permeability that is augmented by VEGF addition (24, 47, 48). Pathogenic hantaviruses inhibit β₃ integrin functions days after infection and similarly enhance the permeability of endothelial cells in response to VEGF (22).Adherens junctions form the primary fluid barrier of endothelial cells, and VEGFR2 responses control adherens junction disassembly (10, 17, 34, 57, 63). Vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin) is an endothelial cell-specific adherens junction protein and the primary determinant of paracellular permeability within the vascular endothelium (30, 33, 34). Activation of VEGFR2, another endothelial cell-specific protein, triggers signaling responses resulting in VE-cadherin disassembly and endocytosis, which increases the permeability of endothelial cell junctions (10, 12, 17, 34). VEGF is induced by hypoxic conditions and released by endothelial cells, platelets, and immune cells (2, 15, 38, 52). VEGF acts locally on endothelial cells through the autocrine or paracrine activation of VEGFR2, and the disassembly of endothelial cell adherens junctions increases the availability of nutrients to tissues and facilitates leukocyte trafficking and diapedesis (10, 12, 17, 55). The importance of endothelial cell barrier integrity is often in conflict with requirements for endothelial cells to move in order to permit angiogenesis and repair or cell and fluid egress, and as a result, VEGF-induced VE-cadherin responses are tightly controlled (10, 17, 18, 32, 33, 59). This limits capillary permeability while dynamically responding to a variety of endothelial cell-specific factors and conditions. However, if unregulated, this process can result in localized capillary permeability and edema (2, 9, 10, 12, 14, 17, 29, 60).Interestingly, tissue edema and hypoxia are common findings in both HPS and HFRS patients (11, 31, 62), and the ability of pathogenic hantaviruses to infect human endothelial cells provides a means for hantaviruses to directly alter normal VEGF-VE-cadherin regulation. In fact, the permeability of endothelial cells infected by pathogenic Andes virus (ANDV) or Hantaan virus (HTNV) is dramatically enhanced in response to VEGF addition (22). This response is absent from endothelial cells comparably infected with the nonpathogenic TULV and suggests that enhanced VEGF-induced endothelial cell permeability is a common underlying response of both HPS- and HFRS-causing hantaviruses (22). In these studies, we comparatively investigate responses of human endothelial cells infected with pathogenic ANDV and HTNV, as well as nonpathogenic TULV.     

A Dominant-Negative Mutant of rab5 Inhibits Infection of Cells by Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus: Implications for Virus Entry

Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) can use a number of different integrins (αvβ1, αvβ3, αvβ6, and αvβ8) as receptors to initiate infection. Infection mediated by αvβ6 is known to occur by clathrin-mediated endocytosis and is dependent on the acidic pH within endosomes. On internalization, virus is detected rapidly in early endosomes (EE) and subsequently in perinuclear recycling endosomes (PNRE), but not in late endosomal compartments. Due to the extreme sensitivity of FMDV to acidic pH, it is thought that EE can provide a pH low enough for infection to occur; however, definitive proof that infection takes place from within these compartments is still lacking. Here we have investigated the intracellular transport steps required for FMDV infection of IBRS-2 cells, which express αvβ8 as their FMDV receptor. These experiments confirmed that FMDV infection mediated by αvβ8 is also dependent on clathrin-mediate endocytosis and an acidic pH within endosomes. Also, the effect on FMDV infection of dominant-negative (DN) mutants of cellular rab proteins that regulate endosomal traffic was examined. Expression of DN rab5 reduced the number of FMDV-infected cells by 80%, while expression of DN rab4 or DN rab7 had virtually no effect on infection. Expression of DN rab11 inhibited infection by FMDV, albeit to a small extent (∼35%). These results demonstrate that FMDV infection takes place predominantly from within EE and does not require virus trafficking to the late endosomal compartments. However, our results suggest that infection may not be exclusive to EE and that a small amount of infection could occur from within PNRE.Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is a member of the Aphthovirus genus of the family Picornaviridae and the etiological agent responsible for FMD, an economically important and severe vesicular condition of cloven-hoofed animals, including cattle, pigs, sheep, and goats (2). The mature virus particle consists of a positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome (vRNA) enclosed within a nonenveloped icosahedral capsid formed from 60 copies each of four virus-encoded proteins, VP1 to VP4 (1).The initial stage of FMDV infection is virus binding to cell surface integrins via a highly conserved RGD motif located on the GH loop of VP1. A number of different species of RGD-binding integrins (αvβ1, αvβ3, αvβ6, and αvβ8) have been reported to serve as receptors for FMDV (5, 23-26). Using pharmacological and dominant-negative (DN) inhibitors of specific endocytic pathways in combination with immunofluorescence confocal microscopy, the cell entry pathway used by FMDV has been determined for αvβ6-expressing cells (6, 36). These studies established that infection occurs by clathrin-mediated endocytosis and is dependent on the acidic pH within endosomes, which serves as the trigger for capsid disassembly and translocation of the vRNA across the endosomal membrane into the cytosol. Internalized virus was detected rapidly in early endosomes (EE) and subsequently in perinuclear recycling endosomes (PNRE), but not in late endosomes (LE) or lysosomes (Lys) (the late endosomal compartments). Due to the extreme sensitivity of FMDV to acidic pH (15), it is thought that EE can provide a pH low enough for virus disassembly to occur; however, definitive proof that infection takes place from within EE is still lacking. For example, the possibility cannot be excluded that a productive infection requires virus transport to late endosomal compartments, where, following capsid disassembly and viral genome transfer into the cytosol, the capsid proteins are rapidly degraded.rab proteins control multiple membrane trafficking events in the cell. They are members of the ras superfamily of small GTP-binding proteins and cycle between active GTP- and inactive GDP-bound states (22, 38, 39, 47, 50). Conversion between these states is regulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors, which stimulate the binding of GTP, and GTPase-activating proteins that which accelerate GTP hydrolysis. Activated rab proteins are recruited onto membrane-bounded compartments where they regulate many steps of vesicle trafficking, including vesicle budding, movement, tethering, and fusion (35, 61). Each rab is recruited to a specific compartment and functions through interactions with specific effectors that mediate the downstream rab-associated functions (39). In mammalian cells, at least 12 rab proteins that regulate trafficking through the endosomal pathway have been identified (27). Of these, rab4, rab5, rab7, and rab11 play major roles in endocytic vesicle trafficking. rab5 is present on EE and regulates transport of incoming endocytic vesicles from the plasma membrane (PM) to EE and homotypic EE fusion events (3, 8, 10, 20, 30, 44, 52). Both rab4 and rab11 are regulators of receptor recycling from EE back to the PM (34); rab4 is localized primarily to EE and regulates rapid recycling directly back to the PM (16, 45, 48, 51, 56), and rab11 is localized primarily to the PNRE and regulates a slower recycling pathway through these compartments (21, 43, 54, 60). In addition rab11 also regulates membrane traffic from endocytic recycling compartments to the trans-Golgi network (55). rab7 is located primarily on LE and regulates traffic from EE to LE and between LE and Lys (7, 9, 18, 32, 40, 58, 59). The unique targeting of rab proteins to distinct cellular compartments and their specificity as regulators of vesicular trafficking has made them important tools for studying endocytosis. For example, expression of DN or constitutively active mutants of rab proteins that regulate endosomal traffic has been used to identify the intracellular transport steps that are required for infection by a number of different viruses (13, 14, 28, 31, 41, 42, 49, 53, 57, 59).Here we have investigated the intracellular transport steps required for FMDV infection using porcine IBRS-2 cells, which are derived from a natural host of FMDV. IBRS-2 cells use αvβ8, and not αvβ6, as the major FMDV receptor (11). Our initial experiments confirmed that FMDV infection mediated by αvβ8 is dependent on clathrin-mediated endocytosis and on an acidic pH within endosomes. The effect on FMDV infection within IBRS-2 cells of DN mutants of cellular rab proteins that regulate endosomal traffic was examined. These experiments show that rab5 is needed for FMDV infection, as expression of DN rab5 reduced the number of FMDV-infected cells by ∼80%. In contrast, expression of either DN rab4 or DN rab7 had virtually no effect on infection. Expression of DN rab11 inhibited infection by FMDV, albeit to a small extent (∼35%). These results demonstrate that FMDV infection takes place predominantly from within EE and does not require virus trafficking to the late endosomal compartments. However, our results suggest that infection may not be exclusive to EE and that a small amount of infection could occur from within PNRE.