DNA氧化性损伤与端粒缩短

末端复制问题（the end replication problem）不能完全解释端粒在某些细胞分裂过程中迅速缩短的现象.40％的高压氧下细胞传代次数降低,端粒缩短速率增大,细胞出现衰老特征,端粒DNA上单链断裂积累.推测端粒缩短的主要原因在于衰老过程中或氧胁迫下端粒DNA单链断裂增多,使端粒末端单链片段在DNA复制时丢失.端粒酶和活性氧对端粒长度的正负调控作用的准确机制还有待于更深入的研究.     

Normal Human Telomeres Are Not Late Replicating

Telomeres in yeast are late replicating. Genes placed next to telomeres in yeast can be repressed (telomere positional effects), leading to the hypothesis that telomeres may be heterochromatic and may control the expression of subtelomeric genes. In addition, yeast telomeres are processed to have a transient long overhang at the end of S phase. The applicability of the yeast data to human biology was examined by determining the timing of telomere replication and processing in normal human diploid fibroblasts. Telomeres were purified from synchronized cells that had been labeled with 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) at hourly intervals, and the fraction of labeled telomeres was analyzed by retrieval with anti-BrdU antibodies. We determined that normal human telomeres replicate throughout S phase rather than being very late replicating. Furthermore, the overall timing of replication was unaffected by telomere length in young versus old cells or cells whose telomeres had been elongated following transfection with the catalytic subunit of telomerase. Finally, the asymmetry in the length of the G-rich overhang in daughter telomeres produced by leading versus lagging strand synthesis was shown to be established within 1 h of telomere replication, indicating there is no significant delay between synthesis and the processing events that contribute to the establishment of asymmetric overhangs. Therefore, the timings of replication and processing of human telomeres are very different from those of yeast.     

Low-Dose Formaldehyde Delays DNA Damage Recognition and DNA Excision Repair in Human Cells

Objective

Formaldehyde is still widely employed as a universal crosslinking agent, preservative and disinfectant, despite its proven carcinogenicity in occupationally exposed workers. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to understand the possible impact of low-dose formaldehyde exposures in the general population. Due to the concomitant occurrence of multiple indoor and outdoor toxicants, we tested how formaldehyde, at micromolar concentrations, interferes with general DNA damage recognition and excision processes that remove some of the most frequently inflicted DNA lesions.

Methodology/Principal Findings

The overall mobility of the DNA damage sensors UV-DDB (ultraviolet-damaged DNA-binding) and XPC (xeroderma pigmentosum group C) was analyzed by assessing real-time protein dynamics in the nucleus of cultured human cells exposed to non-cytotoxic (<100 μM) formaldehyde concentrations. The DNA lesion-specific recruitment of these damage sensors was tested by monitoring their accumulation at local irradiation spots. DNA repair activity was determined in host-cell reactivation assays and, more directly, by measuring the excision of DNA lesions from chromosomes. Taken together, these assays demonstrated that formaldehyde obstructs the rapid nuclear trafficking of DNA damage sensors and, consequently, slows down their relocation to DNA damage sites thus delaying the excision repair of target lesions. A concentration-dependent effect relationship established a threshold concentration of as low as 25 micromolar for the inhibition of DNA excision repair.

Conclusions/Significance

A main implication of the retarded repair activity is that low-dose formaldehyde may exert an adjuvant role in carcinogenesis by impeding the excision of multiple mutagenic base lesions. In view of this generally disruptive effect on DNA repair, we propose that formaldehyde exposures in the general population should be further decreased to help reducing cancer risks.     

Repair Responses to DNA Damage: Enzymatic Pathways in E coli and Human Cells

Bacteria and eukaryotic cells employ a variety of enzymatic pathways to remove damage from DNA or to lessen its impact upon cellular functions. Most of these processes were discovered in Escherichia coli and have been most extensively analyzed in this organism because suitable mutants have been isolated and characterized. Analogous pathways have been inferred to exist in mammalian cells from the presence of enzyme activities similar to those known to be involved in repair in bacteria, from the analysis of events in cells treated with DNA damaging agents, and from the analysis of the few naturally occurring mutant cell types. Excision repair of pyrimidine dimers produced by UV in E coli is initiated by an incision event catalyzed by a complex composed of uvrA, uvrB, and uvrC gene products. Multiple exonuclease and polymerase activities are available for the subsequent excision and resynthesis steps. In addition to the constitutive pathway, which produces short patches of 20–30 nucleotides, an inducible excision repair process exists that produces much longer patches. This long patch pathway is controlled by the recA-lexA regulatory circuit and also requires the recF gene. It is apparently not responsible for UV-induced mutagenesis. However, the ability to perform inducible long patch repair correlates with enhanced bacterial survival and with a major component of the Weigle reactivation of bacteriophage with double-strand DNA genomes. Mammalian cells possess an excision repair pathway similar to the constitutive pathway in E coli. Although not as well understood, the incision event is at least as complex, and repair resynthesis produces patches of about the same size as the constitutive short patches. In mammalian cells, no patches comparable in size to those produced by the inducible pathway of E coli are observed. Repair in mammalian cells may be more complicated than in bacteria because of the structure of chromatin, which can affect both the distribution of DNA damage and its accessibility to repair enzymes. A coordinated alteration and reassembly of chromatin at sites of repair may be required. We have observed that the sensitivity of digestion by staphylococcal nuclease (SN) of newly synthesized repair patches resulting from excision of furocoumarin adducts changes with time in the same way as that of patches resulting from excision of pyrimidine dimers. Since furocoumarin adducts are formed only in the SN-sensitive linker DNA between nucleosome cores, this suggests that after repair resynthesis is completed, the nucleosome cores in the region of the repair event do not return exactly to their original positions. We have also studied excision repair of UV and chemical damage in the highly repeated 172 base pair α DNA sequence in African green monkey cells. In UV irradiated cells, the rate and extent of repair resynthesis in this sequence is similar to that in bulk DNA. However, in cells containing furocoumarin adducts, repair resynthesis in α DNA is only about 30% of that in bulk DNA. Since the frequency of adducts does not seem to be reduced in α DNA, it appears that certain adducts in this unique DNA may be less accessible to repair. Endonuclease V of bacteriophage T4 incises DNA at pyrimidine dimers by cleaving first the glycosylic bond between deoxyribose and the 5′ pyrimidine of the dimer and then the phosphodiester bond between the two pyrimidines. We have cloned the gene (denV) that codes for this enzyme and have demonstrated its expression in uvrA recA and uvrB recA cells of E coli. Because T4 endonuclease V can alleviate the excision repair deficiency of xeroderma pigmentosum when added to permeabilized cells or to isolated nuclei after UV irradiation, the cloned denV gene may ultimately be of value for analyzing DNA repair pathways in cultured human cells.     

A Fluorescent Probe to Measure DNA Damage and Repair

DNA damage and repair is a fundamental process that plays an important role in cancer treatment. Base excision repair (BER) is a major repair pathway that often leads to drug resistance in DNA-targeted cancer chemotherapy. In order to measure BER, we have developed a near infrared (NIR) fluorescent probe. This probe binds to a key intermediate, termed apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site, in the BER pathway where DNA damage and repair occurs. We have developed an assay to show the efficacy of the probe binding to AP sites and have shown that it can distinguish AP sites in DNA extract from chemotherapy treated cells. This probe has potential application in monitoring patient response to chemotherapy and evaluating new drugs in development.     

Sirtuin家族与DNA损伤修复

DNA损伤的发生与积累是造成细胞功能紊乱的根本原因,也是引起衰老与肿瘤等疾病发生的关键事件。为维持机体自身遗传物质的完整性与稳定性,生物体内拥有多种针对不同类型DNA损伤的修复方式。Sirtuin蛋白是一组NAD+依赖的、高度保守的组蛋白去乙酰化酶,可通过去乙酰化作用调节众多底物蛋白质的表达、活性与稳定性。 近来的研究显示,DNA损伤修复途径的多个关键蛋白质是Sirtuin的下游底物。Sirtuin蛋白通过调节同源重组修复、非同源末端修复、核苷酸切除修复等途径中的核心蛋白质参与修复包括双链断裂（double stranded breakes, DSBs）在内的多种DNA损伤类型,从而在维持基因组稳定性、寿命以及细胞能量代谢调节等一系列生物学作用中发挥至关重要的作用。本综述将介绍近年来Sirtuin与DNA损伤修复的研究进展。     

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Are Sensitive to DNA Damage

Induced pluripotent stem cells(iPSCs)resemble embryonic stem cells(ESCs)in morphology,gene expression and in vitro differentiation,raising new hope for personalized clinical therapy.While many efforts have been made to improve reprogramming effciency,signifcant problems such as genomic instability of iPSCs need to be addressed before clinical therapy.In this study,we try to fgure out the real genomic state of iPSCs and their DNA damage response to ionizing radiation(IR).We found that iPSC line 3FB4-1 had lower DNA damage repair ability than mouse embryonic fbroblast(MEF)cells,from which 3FB4-1line was derived.After the introduction of DNA damage by IR,the number of c-H2AX foci in 3FB4-1 increased modestly compared to a large increase seen in MEF,albeit both signifcantly(P<0.01).In addition,whole-genome sequencing analysis showed that after IR,3FB4-1 possessed more point mutations than MEF and the point mutations spread all over chromosomes.These observations provide evidence that iPSCs are more sensitive to ionizing radiation and their relatively low DNA damage repair capacity may account for their high radiosensitivity.The compromised DNA damage repair capacity of iPSCs should be considered when used in clinical therapy.     

DNA损伤修复过程表观遗传学改变

多种化学、物理及生物因素可诱发细胞DNA损伤,损伤后DNA损伤位点被相关损伤感受器识别,激活相应的修复通路进行DNA修复。越来越多的证据表明DNA甲基化状态、蛋白翻译后修饰、染色质重塑、miRNA等修饰方式参与了DNA的损伤修复。文章通过不同损伤修复通路中这些修饰的特点,阐述表观遗传学改变在DNA损伤修复发展过程中的作用机制。     

Arabidopsis Flavonoid Mutants Are Hypersensitive to UV-B Irradiation

Increases in the terrestrial levels of ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation (280 to 320 nm) due to diminished stratospheric ozone have prompted an investigation of the protective mechanisms that contribute to UV-B tolerance in plants. In response to UV-B stress, flowering plants produce a variety of UV-absorptive secondary products derived from phenylalanine. Arabidopsis mutants with defects in the synthesis of these compounds were tested for UV-B sensitivity. The transparent testa-4 (tt4) mutant, which has reduced flavonoids and normal levels of sinapate esters, is more sensitive to UV-B than the wild type when grown under high UV-B irradiance. The tt5 and tt6 mutants, which have reduced levels of UV-absorptive leaf flavonoids and the monocyclic sinapic acid ester phenolic compounds, are highly sensitive to the damaging effects of UV-B radiation. These results demonstrate that both flavonoids and other phenolic compounds play important roles in vivo in plant UV-B protection.     

DNA Damage and Repair in Eukaryotic Cells

DAMAGE IN DNA AFTER IRRADIATION CAN BE CLASSIFIED INTO FIVE KINDS: base damage, single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks, DNA-DNA cross-linking, and DNA-protein cross-linking. Of these, repair of base damage is the best understood. In eukaryotes, at least three repair systems are known that can deal with base damage: photoreactivation, excision repair, and post-replication repair. Photoreactivation is specific for UV-induced damage and occurs widely throughout the biosphere, although it seems to be absent from placental mammals. Excision repair is present in prokaryotes and in animals but does not seem to be present in plants. Post-replication repair is poorly understood. Recent reports indicate that growing points in mammalian DNA simply skip past UV-induced lesions, leaving gaps in newly made DNA that are subsequently filled in by de novo synthesis. Evidence that this concept is oversimplified or incorrect is presented.-Single-strand breaks are induced by ionizing radiation but most cells can rapidly repair most or all of them, even after supralethal doses. The chemistry of the fragments formed when breaks are induced by ionizing radiation is complex and poorly understood. Therefore, the intermediate steps in the repair of single-strand breaks are unknown. Double-strand breaks and the two kinds of cross-linking have been studied very little and almost nothing is known about their mechanisms for repair.-The role of mammalian DNA repair in mutations is not known. Although there is evidence that defective repair can lead to cancer and/or premature aging in humans, the relationship between the molecular defects and the diseased state remains obscure.     

DNA Damage Checkpoint, Damage Repair, and Genome Stability

Genomic DNA is under constant attack from both endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damaging agents. Without proper care, the ensuing DNA damages would lead to alteration of genomic structure thus affecting the faithful transmission of genetic information. During the process of evolution, organisms have acquired a series of mechanisms responding to and repairing DNA damage, thus assuring the maintenance of genome stability and faithful transmission of genetic information. DNA damage checkpoint is one such important mechanism by which, in the face of DNA damage, a cell can respond to amplified damage signals, either by actively halting the cell cycle until it ensures that critical processes such as DNA replication or mitosis are complete or by initiating apoptosis as a last resort. Over the last decade, complex hierarchical interactions between the key components like ATM/ATR in the checkpoint pathway and various other mediators, effectors including DNA damage repair proteins have begun to emerge. In the meantime, an intimate relationship between mechanisms of damage checkpoint pathway, DNA damage repair, and genome stability was also uncovered. Reviewed hereinare the recent findings on both the mechanisms of activation of checkpoint pathways and their coordination with DNA damage repair machinery as well as their effect on genomic integrity.     

DNA损伤检验点与损伤修复及基因组稳定性

生物有机体基因组DNA经常会受到内源或外源因素的影响而导致结构发生变化,产生损伤;在长期进化过程中,有机体也相应形成了一系列应对与修复损伤DNA,并维持染色体基因组正常结构功能的机制。其中DNA损伤检验点（DNA damage checkpoint）就是在感应DNA损伤的基础上,对损伤感应信号进行转导,或引起细胞周期的暂停,从而使细胞有足够的时间对损伤DNA进行修复,或最终导致细胞发生凋亡。DNA损伤检验点信号转导途径是一个高度保守的信号感应过程,整个途径大致可以分为损伤感应、信号传递及信号效应3个组成部分。其中3-磷脂酰肌醇激酶家族类成员ATM（ataxia-telangiectasia mutated）和ATR（ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related）活性的增加构成整个途径活化的第一步。它们通过激活下游的效应激酶,Chk2／Chk1,通过协同作用许多其他调控细胞周期、DNA复制、DNA损伤修复及细胞凋亡等过程的蛋白质因子来实现细胞对DNA损伤的高度协调反应。近十几年,随着此领域研究的不断深入,人们逐步揭示了DNA损伤检验点途径发生过程中,各种核心组分通过与不同调节因子、效应因子及DNA损伤修复蛋白间的复杂相互作用,以实现监测感应异常DNA结构并实施相应反应的机制;其中,检验点衔接因子（mediators）及染色质结构,尤其是核小体组蛋白的共价修饰在调控ATM／ATR活性,促进ATM／ATR与底物间的相互作用以及介导DNA损伤位点周围染色质区域上多蛋白复合物在时间与空间上的动态形成发挥着重要的作用。同时,人们也开始发现DNA损伤检验点途径与DNA损伤修复、基因组稳定性以及肿瘤发生等过程之间某些内在的联系。该反应途径在通过协调细胞针对DNA损伤做出各种反应的基础上,直接或间接地参与或调控DNA损伤修复过程,并与DNA损伤修复途径协同作用最终保证染色体基凶组结构的完整性,而检验点途径的改变,则会引起基因组不稳定的发生,包括从突变频率的提高到大范围的染色体重排,以及染色体数量的畸变。如：突变发生在肿瘤形成早期,会大大增加肿瘤发生的几率。文章将对DNA损伤检验点途径机制及其对DNA损伤修复、基因组稳定性影响的最新进展进行综述。