microRNAs和体细胞重编程

体细胞重编程与microRNAs(miRNAs)均为近年来研究的热点问题。到目前为止,能成功诱导体细胞形成多能性干细胞的体细胞重编程方法有核移植(nuclear transfer,NT)和外源因子诱导形成多能干细胞(induced pluripotent stem cells,iPSc)两种,这两种方法让人们看到了体细胞重编程在细胞治疗方面具有诱人的应用前景。miRNAs是真核生物中存在的一类长度为22nt左右起调控作用的内源性非编码RNA,它在转录后水平调节靶基因的表达,是细胞内基因表达的基本调控机制之一。近年的研究结果表明,miRNAs在干细胞干性维持和分化过程中具有重要的调节作用,从miRNAs角度研究体细胞重编程机理将对体细胞重编程的应用具有重要意义。     

Pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming

Embryonic stem cells are promising donor cell sources for cell transplantation therapy, which may in the future be used to treat various diseases and injuries. However, as is the case for organ transplantation, immune rejection after transplantation is a potential problem with this type of therapy. Moreover, the use of human embryos presents serious ethical difficulties. These issues may be overcome if pluripotent stem cells are generated from patients' somatic cells. Here, we review the molecular mechanisms underlying pluripotency and the currently known methods of inducing pluripotency in somatic cells.     

Repressors of reprogramming

Induced pluripotent stem cells(i PSCs) have been the focal point of ever increasing interest and scrutiny as they hold the promise of personalized regenerative medicine. However, creation of i PSCs is an inefficient process that requires forced expression of potentially oncogenic proteins. In order to unlock the full potential of i PSCs, both for basic and clinical research, we must broaden our search for more reliable ways of inducing pluripotency in somatic cells. This review surveys an area of reprogramming that does not receive as much focus, barriers to reprogramming, in the hope of stimulating new ideas and approaches towardsdeveloping safer and more efficient methods of reprogramming. Better methods of i PSC creation will allow for more reliable disease modeling, better basic research into the pluripotent state and safer i PSCs that can be used in a clinical setting.     

Metformin and reprogramming into iPSCs

Comment on: Vazquez-Martin A, et al. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:922–33     

Cohesin's role in pluripotency and reprogramming

Cohesin is required for ES cell self-renewal and iPS-mediated reprogramming of somatic cells. This may indicate a special role for cohesin in the regulation of pluripotency genes, perhaps by mediating long-range chromosomal interactions between gene regulatory elements. However, cohesin is also essential for genome integrity, and its depletion from cycling cells induces DNA damage responses. Hence, the failure of cohesin-depleted cells to establish or maintain pluripotency gene expression could be explained by a loss of long-range interactions or by DNA damage responses that undermine pluripotency gene expression. In recent work we began to disentangle these possibilities by analyzing reprogramming in the absence of cell division. These experiments showed that cohesin was not specifically required for reprogramming, and that the expression of most pluripotency genes was maintained when ES cells were acutely depleted of cohesin. Here we take this analysis to its logical conclusion by demonstrating that deliberately inflicted DNA damage - and the DNA damage that results from proliferation in the absence of cohesin - can directly interfere with pluripotency and reprogramming. The role of cohesin in pluripotency and reprogramming may therefore be best explained by essential cohesin functions in the cell cycle.