Mechanistic studies on activation of ubiquitin and di-ubiquitin-like protein, FAT10, by ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 6, Uba6

Uba6 is a homolog of the ubiquitin-activating enzyme, Uba1, and activates two ubiquitin-like proteins (UBLs), ubiquitin and FAT10. In this study, biochemical and biophysical experiments were performed to understand the mechanisms of how Uba6 recognizes two distinct UBLs and catalyzes their activation and transfer. Uba6 is shown to undergo a three-step activation process and form a ternary complex with both UBLs, similar to what has been observed for Uba1. The catalytic mechanism of Uba6 is further supported by inhibition studies using a mechanism-based E1 inhibitor, Compound 1, which forms covalent adducts with both ubiquitin and FAT10. In addition, pre-steady state kinetic analysis revealed that the rates of UBL-adenylate (step 1) and thioester (step 2) formation are similar between ubiquitin and FAT10. However, distinct kinetic behaviors were also observed for ubiquitin and FAT10. FAT10 binds Uba6 with much higher affinity than ubiquitin while demonstrating lower catalytic activity in both ATP-PP(i) exchange and E1-E2 transthiolation assays. Also, Compound 1 is less potent with FAT10 as the UBL compared with ubiquitin in ATP-PP(i) exchange assays, and both a slow rate of covalent adduct formation and weak adduct binding to Uba6 contribute to the diminished potency observed for FAT10. Together with expression level analysis in IM-9 cells, this study sheds light on the potential role of cytokine-induced FAT10 expression in regulating Uba6 pathways.     

The HIP2~Ubiquitin Conjugate Forms a Non-Compact Monomeric Thioester during Di-Ubiquitin Synthesis

Polyubiquitination is a post-translational event used to control the degradation of damaged or unwanted proteins by modifying the target protein with a chain of ubiquitin molecules. One potential mechanism for the assembly of polyubiquitin chains involves the dimerization of an E2 conjugating enzyme allowing conjugated ubiquitin molecules to be put into close proximity to assist reactivity. HIP2 (UBE2K) and Ubc1 (yeast homolog of UBE2K) are unique E2 conjugating enzymes that each contain a C-terminal UBA domain attached to their catalytic domains, and they have basal E3-independent polyubiquitination activity. Although the isolated enzymes are monomeric, polyubiquitin formation activity assays show that both can act as ubiquitin donors or ubiquitin acceptors when in the activated thioester conjugate suggesting dimerization of the E2-ubiquitin conjugates. Stable disulfide complexes, analytical ultracentrifugation and small angle x-ray scattering were used to show that the HIP2-Ub and Ubc1-Ub thioester complexes remain predominantly monomeric in solution. Models of the HIP2-Ub complex derived from SAXS data show the complex is not compact but instead forms an open or backbent conformation similar to UbcH5b~Ub or Ubc13~Ub where the UBA domain and covalently attached ubiquitin reside on opposite ends of the catalytic domain. Activity assays showed that full length HIP2 exhibited a five-fold increase in the formation rate of di-ubiquitin compared to a HIP2 lacking the UBA domain. This difference was not observed for Ubc1 and may be attributed to the closer proximity of the UBA domain in HIP2 to the catalytic core than for Ubc1.     

Ubiquitin manipulation by an E2 conjugating enzyme using a novel covalent intermediate

Degradation of misfolded and damaged proteins by the 26 S proteasome requires the substrate to be tagged with a polyubiquitin chain. Assembly of polyubiquitin chains and subsequent substrate labeling potentially involves three enzymes, an E1, E2, and E3. E2 proteins are key enzymes and form a thioester intermediate through their catalytic cysteine with the C-terminal glycine (Gly76) of ubiquitin. This thioester intermediate is easily hydrolyzed in vitro and has eluded structural characterization. To overcome this, we have engineered a novel ubiquitin-E2 disulfide-linked complex by mutating Gly76 to Cys76 in ubiquitin. Reaction of Ubc1, an E2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, with this mutant ubiquitin resulted in an ubiquitin-E2 disulfide that could be purified and was stable for several weeks. Chemical shift perturbation analysis of the disulfide ubiquitin-Ubc1 complex by NMR spectroscopy reveals an ubiquitin-Ubc1 interface similar to that for the ubiquitin-E2 thioester. In addition to the typical E2 catalytic domain, Ubc1 contains an ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain, and we have utilized NMR spectroscopy to demonstrate that in this disulfide complex the UBA domain is freely accessible to non-covalently bind a second molecule of ubiquitin. The ability of the Ubc1 to bind two ubiquitin molecules suggests that the UBA domain does not interact with the thioester-bound ubiquitin during polyubiquitin chain formation. Thus, construction of this novel ubiquitin-E2 disulfide provides a method to characterize structurally the first step in polyubiquitin chain assembly by Ubc1 and its related class II enzymes.     

Noncovalent interaction between Ubc9 and SUMO promotes SUMO chain formation

The ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO regulates a wide range of cellular processes by post-translational modification with one, or a chain of SUMO molecules. Sumoylation is achieved by the sequential action of several enzymes in which the E2, Ubc9, transfers SUMO from the E1 to the target mostly with the help of an E3 enzyme. In this process, Ubc9 not only forms a thioester bond with SUMO, but also interacts with SUMO noncovalently. Here, we show that this noncovalent interaction promotes the formation of short SUMO chains on targets such as Sp100 and HDAC4. We present a crystal structure of the noncovalent Ubc9-SUMO1 complex, showing that SUMO is located far from the E2 active site and resembles the noncovalent interaction site for ubiquitin on UbcH5c and Mms2. Structural comparison suggests a model for poly-sumoylation involving a mechanism analogous to Mms2-Ubc13-mediated ubiquitin chain formation.     

Unique binding interactions among Ubc9, SUMO and RanBP2 reveal a mechanism for SUMO paralog selection

The conjugation of small ubiquitin-like modifiers SUMO-1, SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 onto target proteins requires the concerted action of the specific E1-activating enzyme SAE1/SAE2, the E2-conjugating enzyme Ubc9, and an E3-like SUMO ligase. NMR chemical shift perturbation was used to identify the surface of Ubc9 that interacts with the SUMO ligase RanBP2. Unlike known ubiquitin E2-E3 interactions, RanBP2 binds to the beta-sheet of Ubc9. Mutational disruption of Ubc9-RanBP2 binding affected SUMO-2 but not SUMO-1 conjugation to Sp100 and to a newly identified RanBP2 substrate, PML. RanBP2 contains a binding site specific for SUMO-1 but not SUMO-2, indicating that a Ubc9-SUMO-1 thioester could be recruited to RanBP2 via SUMO-1 in the absence of strong binding between Ubc9 and RanBP2. Thus we show that E2-E3 interactions are not conserved across the ubiquitin-like protein superfamily and identify a RanBP2-dependent mechanism for SUMO paralog-specific conjugation.     

Structure and analysis of a complex between SUMO and Ubc9 illustrates features of a conserved E2-Ubl interaction

The SUMO E2 Ubc9 serves as a lynchpin in the SUMO conjugation pathway, interacting with the SUMO E1 during activation, with thioester linked SUMO after E1 transfer and with the substrate and SUMO E3 ligases during conjugation. Here, we describe the structure determination of a non-covalent complex between human Ubc9 and SUMO-1 at 2.4 A resolution. Non-covalent interactions between Ubc9 and SUMO are conserved in human and yeast insomuch as human Ubc9 interacts with each of the human SUMO isoforms, and yeast Ubc9 interacts with Smt3, the yeast SUMO ortholog. Structural comparisons reveal similarities to several other non-covalent complexes in the ubiquitin pathway, suggesting that the non-covalent Ubc9-SUMO interface may be important for poly-SUMO chain formation, for E2 recruitment to SUMO conjugated substrates, or for mediating E2 interactions with either E1 or E3 ligases. Biochemical analysis suggests that this surface is less important for E1 activation or di-SUMO-2 formation, but more important for E3 interactions and for poly-SUMO chain formation when the chain exceeds more than two SUMO proteins.     

NEDD8 recruits E2-ubiquitin to SCF E3 ligase

NEDD8/Rub1 is a ubiquitin (Ub)-like post-translational modifier that is covalently linked to cullin (Cul)-family proteins in a manner analogous to ubiquitylation. NEDD8 is known to enhance the ubiquitylating activity of the SCF complex (composed of Skp1, Cul-1, ROC1 and F-box protein), but the mechanistic role is largely unknown. Using an in vitro reconstituted system, we report here that NEDD8 modification of Cul-1 enhances recruitment of Ub-conjugating enzyme Ubc4 (E2) to the SCF complex (E3). This recruitment requires thioester linkage of Ub to Ubc4. Our findings indicate that the NEDD8-modifying system accelerates the formation of the E2-E3 complex, which stimulates protein polyubiquitylation.     

ISG15 modification of Ubc13 suppresses its ubiquitin-conjugating activity

ISG15 is one of the interferon-stimulated genes and is classified as a ubiquitin-like protein. Upon interferon stimuli, ISG15 is upregulated and becomes conjugated to various cellular proteins (ISGylation). Several target proteins for ISGylation have recently been identified, but the biological consequence of protein ISGylation remains unclear. In the course of our study to identify components of the ISGylation system, we found that Ubc13, an E2 enzyme for ubiquitin conjugation, is covalently modified with ISG15. To determine the meaning of ISGylation of Ubc13, we isolated ISG15-modified Ubc13 protein and compared its ubiquitin-conjugating activity with that of an unmodified one. We found that ISGylation of Ubc13 suppresses its ability to form a thioester intermediate with ubiquitin.     

Characterization of cullin-based E3 ubiquitin ligases in intact mammalian cells--evidence for cullin dimerization

Cullin-based E3 ligases are a large family of ubiquitin ligases with diverse cellular functions. They are composed of one of six mammalian cullin homologues, the Ring finger containing protein Roc1/Rbx1 and cullin homologue-specific adapter and substrate recognition subunits. To be active, cullin-based ligases require the covalent modification of a conserved lysine residue in the cullin protein with the ubiquitin-like protein Nedd8. To characterize this family of E3 ligases in intact cells, we generated a cell line with tetracycline-inducible expression of a dominant-negative mutant of the Nedd8-conjugating enzyme Ubc12, a reported inhibitor of cullin neddylation. Using this cell line, we demonstrate that the substrate recognition subunit Skp2 and the adaptor protein Skp1 are subject to Ubc12-dependent autoubiquitination and degradation. In contrast, cullin protein stability is not regulated by neddylation in mammalian cells. We also provide evidence that Cul1 and Cul3, as well as their associated substrate recognition subunits Skp2 and Keap1, respectively, homooligomerize in intact cells, suggesting that cullin-based ligases are dimeric. Cul3, but not Cul1 homooligomerization is dependent on substrate recognition subunit dimer formation. As shown for other E3 ubiquitin ligases, dimerization may play a role in regulating the activity of cullin-based E3 ligases.     

Structural basis for recruitment of Ubc12 by an E2 binding domain in NEDD8's E1

E2 conjugating enzymes play a central role in ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like protein (ublp) transfer cascades: the E2 accepts the ublp from the E1 enzyme and then the E2 often interacts with an E3 enzyme to promote ublp transfer to the target. We report here the crystal structure of a complex between the C-terminal domain from NEDD8's heterodimeric E1 (APPBP1-UBA3) and the catalytic core domain of NEDD8's E2 (Ubc12). The structure and associated mutational analyses reveal molecular details of Ubc12 recruitment by NEDD8's E1. Interestingly, the E1's Ubc12 binding domain resembles ubiquitin and recruits Ubc12 in a manner mimicking ubiquitin's interactions with ubiquitin binding domains. Structural comparison with E2-E3 complexes indicates that the E1 and E3 binding sites on Ubc12 may overlap and raises the possibility that crosstalk between E1 and E3 interacting with an E2 could influence the specificity and processivity of ublp transfer.     

Ubiquitin‐Activated Interaction Traps (UBAITs) identify E3 ligase binding partners

We describe a new class of reagents for identifying substrates, adaptors, and regulators of HECT and RING E3s. UBAITs (Ub iquitin‐A ctivated I nteraction T raps) are E3‐ubiquitin fusion proteins and, in an E1‐ and E2‐dependent manner, the C‐terminal ubiquitin moiety forms an amide linkage to proteins that interact with the E3, enabling covalent co‐purification of the E3 with partner proteins. We designed UBAITs for both HECT (Rsp5, Itch) and RING (Psh1, RNF126, RNF168) E3s. For HECT E3s, trapping of interacting proteins occurred in vitro either through an E3 thioester‐linked lariat intermediate or through an E2 thioester intermediate, and both WT and active‐site mutant UBAITs trapped known interacting proteins in yeast and human cells. Yeast Psh1 and human RNF126 and RNF168 UBAITs also trapped known interacting proteins when expressed in cells. Human RNF168 is a key mediator of ubiquitin signaling that promotes DNA double‐strand break repair. Using the RNF168 UBAIT, we identify H2AZ—a histone protein involved in DNA repair—as a new target of this E3 ligase. These results demonstrate that UBAITs represent powerful tools for profiling a wide range of ubiquitin ligases.     

Noncovalent interaction between ubiquitin and the human DNA repair protein Mms2 is required for Ubc13-mediated polyubiquitination

Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme variants share significant sequence similarity with typical E2 (ubiquitin-conjugating) enzymes of the protein ubiquitination pathway but lack their characteristic active site cysteine residue. The MMS2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes one such ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme variant that is involved in the error-free DNA postreplicative repair pathway through its association with Ubc13, an E2. The Mms2-Ubc13 heterodimer is capable of linking ubiquitin molecules to one another through an isopeptide bond between the C terminus and Lys-63. Using highly purified components, we show here that the human forms of Mms2 and Ubc13 associate into a heterodimer that is stable over a range of conditions. The ubiquitin-thiol ester form of the heterodimer can be produced by the direct activation of its Ubc13 subunit with E1 (ubiquitin-activating enzyme) or by the association of Mms2 with the Ubc13-ubiquitin thiol ester. The activated heterodimer is capable of transferring its covalently bound ubiquitin to Lys-63 of an untethered ubiquitin molecule, resulting in diubiquitin as the predominant species. In (1)H (15)N HSQC ((1)H (15)N heteronuclear single quantum coherence) NMR experiments, we have mapped the surface determinants of tethered and untethered ubiquitin that interact with Mms2 and Ubc13 in both their monomeric and dimeric forms. These results have identified a surface of untethered ubiquitin that interacts with Mms2 in the monomeric and heterodimeric form. Furthermore, the C-terminal tail of ubiquitin does not participate in this interaction. These results suggest that the role of Mms2 is to correctly orient either a target-bound or untethered ubiquitin molecule such that its Lys-63 is placed proximally to the C terminus of the ubiquitin molecule that is linked to the active site of Ubc13.     

Characterization of a temperature-sensitive mutant of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme and its use as a heat-inducible degradation signal.

The ubiquitin/proteasome pathway is a highly conserved mechanism of proteolysis in all eukaryotes. Ubiquitin (Ub) is conjugated to proteolytic substrates through the sequential action of ubiquitin-activating (E1/Uba) and ubiquitin-conjugating (E2/Ubc) enzymes. The mechanism of substrate recognition and ubiquitination is an area of active investigation, and we have begun a site-directed mutagenesis approach to define the biochemical and biophysical properties of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes. We have characterized a specific mutation in Ubc4 (Ubc4(P62S)) which was previously shown to cause a temperature-sensitive growth defect in several other Ubc's. Ubc4(P62S) was rapidly degraded in vivo, contributing to the loss of function. However, reconstitution experiments revealed that the catalytic activity of Ubc4(P62S) was reversibly inactivated at 37 degrees C, demonstrating that the primary defect of Ubc4(P62S) is its inability to form a ubiquitin thioester bond at high temperature. The in vivo defect is compounded by increased susceptibility of Ubc4(P62S) to degradation by the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. We have exploited the temperature-dependent degradation of the P62S mutant to destabilize an otherwise stable test protein (glutathione S-transferase). The use of this mutant may provide a useful cis-acting temperature-inducible degradation signal.     

Interaction of the tail with the catalytic region of a class II E2 conjugating enzyme

Ubiquitination plays an important role in many biological processes, including DNA repair, cell cycle regulation, and protein degradation. In the latter pathway the ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes or E2 enzymes are important proteins forming a key E2-ubiquitin thiolester prior to substrate labelling. While the structure of the 150-residue catalytic domain has been well characterized, a subset of E2 enzymes (class II) carry a variable length C-terminal `tail' where structural detail is not available. The presence of this C-terminal extension plays an important role in target recognition, ubiquitin chain assembly and oligomerization. In this work NMR spectroscopy was used to determine the secondary structure of the 215-residue yeast E2 protein Ubc1 and the interactions of its C-terminus with the catalytic domain. The C-terminal tail of Ubc1 was found to contain three -helices between residues D169-S176, K183-L193 and N203-L213 providing the first evidence for a well-defined secondary structure in this region. Chemical shift mapping indicated that residues in the L2 loop of the catalytic domain were most affected indicating the C-terminus of Ubc1 likely interacts with this region. This site of interaction is distinct from that observed in the E2-ubiquitin thiolester and may act to protect the catalytic C88 residue and direct the interaction of ubiquitin in the thiolester intermediate.     

Evidence for an interaction between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and the 26S proteasome

The targeting of proteolytic substrates is accomplished by a family of ubiquitin-conjugating (E2) enzymes and a diverse set of substrate recognition (E3) factors. The ligation of a multiubiquitin chain to a substrate can promote its degradation by the proteasome. However, the mechanism that facilitates the translocation of a substrate to the proteasome in vivo is poorly understood. We have discovered that E2 proteins, including Ubc1, Ubc2, Ubc4, and Ubc5, can interact with the 26S proteasome. Significantly, the interaction between Ubc4 and the proteasome is strongly induced by heat stress, consistent with the requirement for this E2 for efficient stress tolerance. A catalytically inactive derivative of Ubc4 (Ubc4(C86A)), which causes toxicity in yeast cells, can also bind the proteasome. Purified proteasomes can ligate ubiquitin to a test substrate without the addition of exogenous E2 protein, suggesting that the ubiquitylation of some proteolytic substrates might be directly coupled to degradation by the proteasome.     

Ubiquitin in motion: structural studies of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme∼ubiquitin conjugate

Ubiquitination of proteins provides a powerful and versatile post-translational signal in the eukaryotic cell. The formation of a thioester bond between ubiquitin (Ub) and the active site of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2) is critical for the transfer of Ub to substrates. Assembly of a functional ubiquitin ligase (E3) complex poised for Ub transfer involves recognition and binding of an E2～Ub conjugate. Therefore, full characterization of the structure and dynamics of E2～Ub conjugates is required for further mechanistic understanding of Ub transfer reactions. Here we present characterization of the dynamic behavior of E2～Ub conjugates of two human enzymes, UbcH5c～Ub and Ubc13～Ub, in solution as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance and small-angle X-ray scattering. Within each conjugate, Ub retains great flexibility with respect to the E2, indicative of highly dynamic species that adopt manifold orientations. The population distribution of Ub conformations is dictated by the identity of the E2: the UbcH5c～Ub conjugate populates an array of extended conformations, and the population of Ubc13～Ub conjugates favors a closed conformation in which the hydrophobic surface of Ub faces helix 2 of Ubc13. We propose that the varied conformations adopted by Ub represent available binding modes of the E2～Ub species and thus provide insight into the diverse E2～Ub protein interactome, particularly with regard to interaction with Ub ligases.     

Rhes,a Physiologic Regulator of Sumoylation,Enhances Cross-sumoylation between the Basic Sumoylation Enzymes E1 and Ubc9

We recently reported that the small G-protein Rhes has the properties of a SUMO-E3 ligase and mediates mutant huntingtin (mHtt) cytotoxicity. We now demonstrate that Rhes is a physiologic regulator of sumoylation, which is markedly reduced in the corpus striatum of Rhes-deleted mice. Sumoylation involves activation and transfer of small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) from the thioester of E1 to the thioester of Ubc9 (E2) and final transfer to lysines on target proteins, which is enhanced by E3s. We show that E1 transfers SUMO from its thioester directly to lysine residues on Ubc9, forming isopeptide linkages. Conversely, sumoylation on E1 requires transfer of SUMO from the thioester of Ubc9. Thus, the process regarded as “autosumoylation” reflects intermolecular transfer between E1 and Ubc9, which we designate “cross-sumoylation.” Rhes binds directly to both E1 and Ubc9, enhancing cross-sumoylation as well as thioester transfer from E1 to Ubc9.     

Structure of a conjugating enzyme-ubiquitin thiolester intermediate reveals a novel role for the ubiquitin tail

BACKGROUND: Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) are central enzymes involved in ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. During this process, ubiquitin (Ub) and the E2 protein form an unstable E2-Ub thiolester intermediate prior to the transfer of ubiquitin to an E3-ligase protein and the labeling of a substrate for degradation. A series of complex interactions occur among the target substrate, ubiquitin, E2, and E3 in order to efficiently facilitate the transfer of the ubiquitin molecule. However, due to the inherent instability of the E2-Ub thiolester, the structural details of this complex intermediate are not known. RESULTS: A three-dimensional model of the E2-Ub thiolester intermediate has been determined for the catalytic domain of the E2 protein Ubc1 (Ubc1(Delta450)) and ubiquitin from S. cerevisiae. The interface of the E2-Ub intermediate was determined by kinetically monitoring thiolester formation by 1H-(15)N HSQC spectra by using combinations of 15N-labeled and unlabeled Ubc1(Delta450) and Ub proteins. By using the surface interface as a guide and the X-ray structures of Ub and the 1.9 A structure of Ubc1(Delta450) determined here, docking simulations followed by energy minimization were used to produce the first model of a E2-Ub thiolester intermediate. CONCLUSIONS: Complementary surfaces were found on the E2 and Ub proteins whereby the C terminus of Ub wraps around the E2 protein terminating in the thiolester between C88 (Ubc1(Delta450)) and G76 (Ub). The model supports in vivo and in vitro experiments of E2 derivatives carrying surface residue substitutions. Furthermore, the model provides insights into the arrangement of Ub, E2, and E3 within a ternary targeting complex.     

Nedd8-modification of Cul1 is promoted by Roc1 as a Nedd8-E3 ligase and regulates its stability

SCF is a ubiquitin ligase and is composed of Skp1, Cul1, F-box protein, and Roc1. The catalytic site of the SCF is the Cul1/Roc1 complex and RING-finger protein Roc1. It was shown earlier that when Cul1 was co-expressed with Roc1 in Sf-9 cells in a baculovirus protein expression system, Cul1 was highly neddylated in the cell, suggesting that Roc1 may function as a Nedd8-E3 ligase. However, there is no direct evidence that Roc1 is a Nedd8-E3 in an in vitro enzyme system. Here we have shown that Roc1 binds to Ubc12, E2 for Nedd8, but not to Ubc9, E2 for SUMO-1 and Roc1 RING-finger mutant, H77A, did not bind to Ubc12. In in vitro neddylation system using purified Cul1/Roc1 complex expressed in bacteria, Roc1 promotes neddylation of Cul1. These results demonstrate that Roc1 functions as a Nedd8-E3 ligase toward Cul1. Furthermore, Roc1 and Cul1 were ubiquitinylated in a manner dependent on the neddylation of Cul1 in vitro. In addition, Cul1 was degraded through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, and a non-neddylated mutant Cul1, K720R, was more stable than wild-type in intact cells. Thus, neddylation of Cul1 might regulate SCF function negatively via degradation of Cul1/Roc1 complex.