Mutational analysis of the ethylene receptor ETR1. Role of the histidine kinase domain in dominant ethylene insensitivity

The ethylene receptor family of Arabidopsis consists of five members, one of these being ETR1. The N-terminal half of ETR1 contains a hydrophobic domain responsible for ethylene binding and membrane localization. The C-terminal half of the polypeptide contains domains with homology to histidine (His) kinases and response regulators, signaling motifs originally identified in bacteria. The role of the His kinase domain in ethylene signaling was examined in planta. For this purpose, site-directed mutations were introduced into the full-length wild-type ETR1 gene and into etr1-1, a mutant allele that confers dominant ethylene insensitivity on plants. The mutant forms of the receptor were expressed in Arabidopsis and the transgenic plants characterized for their ethylene responses. A mutation that eliminated His kinase activity did not affect the ability of etr1-1 to confer ethylene insensitivity. A truncated version of etr1-1 that lacks the His kinase domain also conferred ethylene insensitivity. Possible mechanisms by which a truncated version of etr1-1 could exert dominance are discussed.     

Requirement of the histidine kinase domain for signal transduction by the ethylene receptor ETR1

In Arabidopsis, ethylene is perceived by a receptor family consisting of five members, one of these being ETR1. The N-terminal half of ETR1 functions as a signal input domain. The C-terminal region of ETR1, consisting of a His kinase domain and a putative receiver domain, is likely to function in signal output. The role of the proposed signal output region in ethylene signaling was examined in planta. For this purpose, the ability of mutant versions of ETR1 to rescue the constitutive ethylene-response phenotype of the etr1-6;etr2-3;ein4-4 triple loss-of-function mutant line was examined. A truncated version of ETR1 that lacks both the His kinase domain and the receiver domain failed to rescue the triple mutant phenotype. A truncated ETR1 receptor that lacks only the receiver domain restored normal growth to the triple mutant in air, but the transgenic seedlings displayed hypersensitivity to low doses of ethylene. A mutation that eliminated His kinase activity had a modest effect upon the ability of the receptor to repress ethylene responses in air. These results demonstrate that the His kinase domain plays a role in the repression of ethylene responses. The potential roles of the receiver domain and His kinase activity in ethylene signaling are discussed.     

Spectroscopic and QM/MM studies of the Cu(I) binding site of the plant ethylene receptor ETR1

Herein, we present, to our knowledge, the first spectroscopic characterization of the Cu(I) active site of the plant ethylene receptor ETR1. The x-ray absorption (XAS) and extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopies presented here establish that ETR1 has a low-coordinate Cu(I) site. The EXAFS resolves a mixed first coordination sphere of N/O and S scatterers at distances consistent with potential histidine and cysteine residues. This finding agrees with the coordination of residues C65 and H69 to the Cu(I) site, which are critical for ethylene activity and well conserved. Furthermore, the Cu K-edge XAS and EXAFS of ETR1 exhibit spectroscopic changes upon addition of ethylene that are attributed to modifications in the Cu(I) coordination environment, suggestive of ethylene binding. Results from umbrella sampling simulations of the proposed ethylene binding helix of ETR1 at a mixed quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics level agree with the EXAFS fit distance changes upon ethylene binding, particularly in the increase of the distance between H69 and Cu(I), and yield binding energetics comparable with experimental dissociation constants. The observed changes in the copper coordination environment might be the triggering signal for the transmission of the ethylene response.     

Involvement of RTE1 in conformational changes promoting ETR1 ethylene receptor signaling in Arabidopsis

Ethylene is an important regulator of plant growth, development and responses to environmental stresses. Arabidopsis perceives ethylene through five homologous receptors that negatively regulate ethylene responses. RTE1, a novel gene conserved in plants, animals and some protists, was recently identified as a positive regulator of the ETR1 ethylene receptor. Here, we genetically analyze the dependence of ETR1 on RTE1 in order to obtain further insight into RTE1 function. The function of RTE1 was found to be independent and distinct from that of RAN1, which encodes a copper transporter required for ethylene receptor function. We tested the ability of an rte1 loss-of-function mutation to suppress 11 etr1 ethylene-binding domain mis-sense mutations, all of which result in dominant ethylene insensitivity due to constitutive signaling. This suppression test uncovered two classes of etr1 mutations -RTE1-dependent and RTE1-independent. The nature of these mutations suggests that the ethylene-binding domain is a possible target of RTE1 action. Based on these findings, we propose that RTE1 promotes ETR1 signaling through a conformational effect on the ethylene-binding domain.     

The Relationship between Ethylene Binding and Dominant Insensitivity Conferred by Mutant Forms of the ETR1 Ethylene Receptor

Ethylene responses in Arabidopsis are mediated by a small family of receptors, including the ETR1 gene product. Specific mutations in the N-terminal ethylene-binding domain of any family member lead to dominant ethylene insensitivity. To investigate the mechanism of ethylene insensitivity, we examined the effects of mutations on the ethylene-binding activity of the ETR1 protein expressed in yeast. The etr1-1 and etr1-4 mutations completely eliminated ethylene binding, while the etr1-3 mutation severely reduced binding. Additional site-directed mutations that disrupted ethylene binding in yeast also conferred dominant ethylene insensitivity when the mutated genes were transferred into wild-type Arabidopsis plants. By contrast, the etr1-2 mutation did not disrupt ethylene binding in yeast. These results indicate that dominant ethylene insensitivity may be conferred by mutations that disrupt ethylene binding or that uncouple ethylene binding from signal output by the receptor. Increased dosage of wild-type alleles in triploid lines led to the partial recovery of ethylene sensitivity, indicating that dominant ethylene insensitivity may involve either interactions between wild-type and mutant receptors or competition between mutant and wild-type receptors for downstream effectors.     

The cytoplasmic end of transmembrane domain 3 regulates the activity of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae G-protein-coupled alpha-factor receptor

The binding of alpha-factor to its receptor (Ste2p) activates a G-protein-signaling pathway leading to conjugation of MATa cells of the budding yeast S. cerevisiae. We conducted a genetic screen to identify constitutively activating mutations in the N-terminal region of the alpha-factor receptor that includes transmembrane domains 1-5. This approach identified 12 unique constitutively activating mutations, the strongest of which affected polar residues at the cytoplasmic ends of transmembrane domains 2 and 3 (Asn84 and Gln149, respectively) that are conserved in the alpha-factor receptors of divergent yeast species. Targeted mutagenesis, in combination with molecular modeling studies, suggested that Gln149 is oriented toward the core of the transmembrane helix bundle where it may be involved in mediating an interaction with Asn84. These residues appear to play specific roles in maintaining the inactive conformation of the protein since a variety of mutations at either position cause constitutive receptor signaling. Interestingly, the activity of many mammalian G-protein-coupled receptors is also regulated by conserved polar residues (the E/DRY motif) at the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane domain 3. Altogether, the results of this study suggest a conserved role for the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane domain 3 in regulating the activity of divergent G-protein-coupled receptors.     

Histidine kinase activity of the ethylene receptor ETR1 facilitates the ethylene response in Arabidopsis

In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), ethylene is perceived by a receptor family consisting of five members. Subfamily 1 members ETHYLENE RESPONSE1 (ETR1) and ETHYLENE RESPONSE SENSOR1 (ERS1) have histidine kinase activity, unlike the subfamily 2 members ETR2, ERS2, and ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE4 (EIN4), which lack amino acid residues critical for this enzymatic activity. To resolve the role of histidine kinase activity in signaling by the receptors, we transformed an etr1-9;ers1-3 double mutant with wild-type and kinase-inactive versions of the receptor ETR1. Both wild-type and kinase-inactive ETR1 rescue the constitutive ethylene-response phenotype of etr1-9;ers1-3, restoring normal growth to the mutant in air. However, the lines carrying kinase-inactive ETR1 exhibit reduced sensitivity to ethylene based on several growth response assays. Microarray and real-time polymerase chain reaction analyses of gene expression support a role for histidine kinase activity in eliciting the ethylene response. In addition, protein levels of the Raf-like kinase CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE RESPONSE1 (CTR1), which physically associates with the ethylene receptor ETR1, are less responsive to ethylene in lines containing kinase-inactive ETR1. These data indicate that the histidine kinase activity of ETR1 is not required for but plays a modulating role in the regulation of ethylene responses. Models for how enzymatic and nonenzymatic regulation may facilitate signaling from the ethylene receptors are discussed.     

Serine/threonine kinase activity in the putative histidine kinase-like ethylene receptor NTHK1 from tobacco

A histidine kinase-based signaling system has been proposed to function in ethylene signal transduction pathway of plants and one ethylene receptor has been found to possess His kinase activity. Here we demonstrate that a His kinase-like ethylene receptor homologue NTHK1 from tobacco has serine/threonine (Ser/Thr) kinase activity, but no His kinase activity. Evidence obtained by analyzing acid/base stability, phosphoamino acid and substrate specificity of the phosphorylated kinase domain, supports this conclusion. In addition, mutation of the presumptive phosphorylation site His (H378) to Gln did not affect the kinase activity whereas deletion of the ATP-binding domain eliminated it, indicating that the conserved His (H378) is not required for the kinase activity and this activity is intrinsic to the NTHK1-KD. Moreover, confocal analysis of NTHK1 expression in insect cells and plant cells suggested the plasma membrane localization of the NTHK1 protein. Thus, NTHK1 may represent a distinct Ser/Thr kinase-type ethylene receptor and function in an alternative mechanism for ethylene signal transduction.     

Identification of tyrosine residues in constitutively activated fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 involved in mitogenesis, Stat activation, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutations are frequently involved in human developmental disorders and cancer. Activation of FGFR3, through mutation or ligand stimulation, results in autophosphorylation of multiple tyrosine residues within the intracellular domain. To assess the importance of the six conserved tyrosine residues within the intracellular domain of FGFR3 for signaling, derivatives were constructed containing an N-terminal myristylation signal for plasma membrane localization and a point mutation (K650E) that confers constitutive kinase activation. A derivative containing all conserved tyrosine residues stimulates cellular transformation and activation of several FGFR3 signaling pathways. Substitution of all nonactivation loop tyrosine residues with phenylalanine rendered this FGFR3 construct inactive, despite the presence of the activating K650E mutation. Addition of a single tyrosine residue, Y724, restored its ability to stimulate cellular transformation, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation, and phosphorylation of Shp2, MAPK, Stat1, and Stat3. These results demonstrate a critical role for Y724 in the activation of multiple signaling pathways by constitutively activated mutants of FGFR3.     

Ethylene-binding activity, gene expression levels, and receptor system output for ethylene receptor family members from Arabidopsis and tomato

Ethylene signaling in plants is mediated by a family of ethylene receptors related to bacterial two-component regulators. Expression in yeast of ethylene-binding domains from the five receptor isoforms from Arabidopsis thaliana and five-receptor isoforms from tomato confirmed that all members of the family are capable of high-affinity ethylene-binding activity. All receptor isoforms displayed a similar level of ethylene binding on a per unit protein basis, while members of both subfamily I and subfamily II from Arabidopsis showed similar slow-release kinetics for ethylene. Quantification of receptor-isoform mRNA levels in receptor-deficient Arabidopsis lines indicated a direct correlation between total message level and total ethylene-binding activity in planta. Increased expression of remaining receptor isoforms in receptor-deficient lines tended to compensate for missing receptors at the level of mRNA expression and ethylene-binding activity, but not at the level of receptor signaling, consistent with specialized roles for family members in receptor signal output.     

Modulation of Constitutive Activity and Signaling Bias of the Ghrelin Receptor by Conformational Constraint in the Second Extracellular Loop

Based on a rare, natural Glu for Ala-204(C+6) variant located six residues after the conserved Cys residue in extracellular loop 2b (ECL2b) associated with selective elimination of the high constitutive signaling of the ghrelin receptor, this loop was subjected to a detailed structure functional analysis. Introduction of Glu in different positions demonstrated that although the constitutive signaling was partly reduced when introduced in position 205(C+7) it was only totally eliminated in position 204(C+6). No charge-charge interaction partner could be identified for the Glu(C+6) variant despite mutational analysis of a number of potential partners in the extracellular loops and outer parts of the transmembrane segments. Systematic probing of position 204(C+6) with amino acid residues of different physicochemical properties indicated that a positively charged Lys surprisingly provided phenotypes similar to those of the negatively charged Glu residue. Computational chemistry analysis indicated that the propensity for the C-terminal segment of extracellular loop 2b to form an extended α-helix was increased from 15% in the wild type to 89 and 82% by introduction in position 204(C+6) of a Glu or a Lys residue, respectively. Moreover, the constitutive activity of the receptor was inhibited by Zn²⁺ binding in an engineered metal ion site, stabilizing an α-helical conformation of this loop segment. It is concluded that the high constitutive activity of the ghrelin receptor is dependent upon flexibility in the C-terminal segment of extracellular loop 2 and that mutations or ligand binding that constrains this segment and thereby conceivably the movements of transmembrane domain V relative to transmembrane domain III inhibits the high constitutive signaling.     

The thyrotropin receptor hinge region is not simply a scaffold for the leucine-rich domain but contributes to ligand binding and signal transduction

The glycoprotein hormone receptor hinge region connects the leucine-rich and transmembrane domains. The prevalent concept is that the hinge does not play a significant role in ligand binding and signal transduction. Portions of the hinge are redundant and can be deleted by mutagenesis or are absent in certain species. A minimal hinge will be more amenable to future investigation of its structure and function. We, therefore, combined and progressively extended previous deletions (Delta) in the TSH receptor (TSHR) hinge region (residues 277-418). TSHRDelta287-366, Delta287-371, Delta287-376, and Delta287-384 progressively lost their response to TSH stimulation of cAMP generation in intact cells, consistent with a progressive loss of TSH binding. The longest deletion (TSHRDelta287-384), reducing the hinge region from 141 to 43 amino acids, totally lost both functions. Surprisingly, however, with deletions extending from residues 371-384, constitutive (ligand-independent) activity increased severalfold, reversing the suppressive (inverse agonist) effect of the TSHR extracellular domain. TSHR-activating point mutations I486F and I568T in the first and second extracellular loops (especially the former) had reduced activity on a background of TSHRDelta287-371. In summary, our data support the concept that the TSHR hinge contributes significantly to ligand binding affinity and signal transduction. Residues within the hinge, particularly between positions 371-384, appear involved in ectodomain inverse agonist activity. In addition, the hinge is necessary for functionality of activating mutations in the first and second extracellular loops. Rather than being an inert linker between the leucine-rich and transmembrane domains, the TSHR hinge is a signaling-specificity domain.     

Identification of residues that contribute to receptor activation through the analysis of compensatory mutations in the G protein-coupled alpha-factor receptor

The alpha-factor receptor (Ste2p) stimulates mating of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ste2p belongs to the large family of G protein-coupled receptors that are characterized by seven transmembrane alpha-helices. Receptor activation is thought to involve changes in the packing of the transmembrane helix bundle. To identify residues that contribute to Ste2p activation, second-site suppressor mutations were isolated that restored function to defective receptors carrying either an F204S or Y266C substitution which affect residues at the extracellular ends of transmembrane domains 5 and 6, respectively. Thirty-five different suppressor mutations were identified. On their own, these mutations caused a range of phenotypes, including hypersensitivity, constitutive activity, altered ligand binding, and loss of function. The majority of the mutations affected residues in the transmembrane segments that are predicted to face the helix bundle. Many of the suppressor mutations caused constitutive receptor activity, suggesting they improved receptor function by partially restoring the balance between the active and inactive states. Analysis of mutations in transmembrane domain 7 implicated residues Ala281 and Thr282 in receptor activation. The A281T and T282A mutants were supersensitive to S. cerevisiae alpha-factor, but were defective in responding to a variant of alpha-factor produced by another species, Saccharomyces kluyveri. The A281T mutant also displayed 8.7-fold enhanced basal signaling. Interestingly, Ala281 and Thr282 are situated in approximately the same position as Lys296 in rhodopsin, which is covalently linked to retinal. These results suggest that transmembrane domain 7 plays a role in receptor activation in a wide range of G protein-coupled receptors from yeast to humans.     

Identification of residues in GTPase-activating protein Src homology 2 domains that control binding to tyrosine phosphorylated growth factor receptors and p62.

Ras GTPase-activating protein (GAP) contains two Src homology 2 (SH2) domains which are implicated in binding to tyrosine-phosphorylated sites in specific activated growth factor receptors and to a cytoplasmic tyrosine-phosphorylated protein, p62. We have used site-directed mutagenesis of the two GAP SH2 domains (SH2-N and SH2-C) to identify residues involved in receptor and p62 binding. A bacterial fusion protein containing the precise SH2-N domain, as defined by sequence homology, associated with both the activated beta platelet-derived growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor, and p62 in vitro. However, short deletions at either the N or C termini of the SH2-N domain abolished binding, suggesting that the entire SH2 sequence is required for formation of an active domain. Conservative substitutions of 2 highly conserved basic residues in the SH2-N domain, an arginine and a histidine, resulted in complete loss of receptor and p62 binding, whereas other basic residues, and residues at variable SH2 sites, were more tolerant of substitution. The conserved arginine and histidine therefore appear critical for association with phosphotyrosine-containing proteins, possibly through an interaction with phosphotyrosine. The GAP SH2-C domain, unlike SH2-N, does not bind efficiently to activated receptors or p62 in vitro. The SH2-C domain lacks 3 residues which are otherwise well conserved, and contribute to high affinity SH2-N binding. Replacement of 1 of these residues, a cysteine, with the consensus glycine, conferred SH2-C binding activity toward tyrosine-phosphorylated p62 and epidermal growth factor receptor. Loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations in the GAP SH2 domains can therefore be used to identify residues that are critical for receptor and p62 binding.     

Possible modulation of Arabidopsis ETR1 N-terminal signaling by CTR1

The mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK) Constitutive Triple-Response1 (CTR1) plays a key role in mediating ethylene receptor signaling via its N-terminal interaction with the ethylene receptor C-terminal histidine kinase (HK) domain. Loss-of-function mutations of CTR1 prevent ethylene receptor signaling, and corresponding ctr1 mutants show a constitutive ethylene response phenotype. We recently reported in Plant Physiology that expression of the truncated ethylene receptor Ethylene Response1 (ETR1) isoforms etr11-349 and dominant ethylene-insensitive etr1-11-349, lacking the C-terminal HK and receiver domains, both suppressed the ctr1 mutant phenotype. Therefore, the ETR1 N terminus is capable of receptor signaling independent of CTR1. The constitutive ethylene response phenotype is stronger for ctr1-1 than ctr1-1 lines expressing the etr11-349 transgene, so N-terminal signaling by the full-length but not truncated ETR1 is inhibited by ctr1-1. We address possible modulations of ETR1 N-terminal signaling with docking of CTR1 on the ETR1 HK domain.     

The third intracellular loop stabilizes the inactive state of the neuropeptide Y1 receptor

Constitutively active G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can signal even in the absence of ligand binding. Most Class I GPCRs are stabilized in the resting conformation by intramolecular interactions involving transmembrane domain (TM) 3 and TM6, particularly at loci 6.30 and 6.34 of TM6. Signaling by Gi/Go-coupled receptors such as the Neuropeptide Y1 receptor decreases already low basal metabolite levels. Thus, we examined constitutive activity using a biochemical assay mediated by a Gi/Gq chimeric protein and a more direct electrophysiological assay. Wild-type (WT-Y1) receptors express no measurable, agonist-independent activation, while mu-opioid receptors (MOR) and P2Y12 purinoceptors showed clear evidence of constitutive activation, especially in the electrophysiological assay. Neither point mutations at TM6 (T6.30A or N6.34A) nor substitution of the entire TM3 and TM6 regions from the MOR into the Y1 receptor increased basal WT-Y1 activation. By contrast, chimeric substitution of the third intracellular loop (ICL3) generated a constitutively active, Y1-ICL3-MOR chimera. Furthermore, the loss of stabilizing interactions from the native ICL3 enhanced the role of surrounding residues to permit basal receptor activation; because constitutive activity of the Y1-ICL3-MOR chimera was further increased by point mutation at locus 6.34, which did not alter WT-Y1 receptor activity. Our results indicate that the ICL3 stabilizes the Y1 receptor in the inactive state and confers structural properties critical for regulating Y receptor activation and signal transduction. These studies reveal the active participation of the ICL3 in the stabilization and activation of Class I GPCRs.     

Autophosphorylation activity of the Arabidopsis ethylene receptor multigene family

Receptors for the gaseous phytohormone ethylene show sequence similarity to bacterial two-component histidine kinases. These receptors are encoded by a multigene family that can be divided into subfamilies 1 and 2. It has been previously shown that a subfamily 1 Arabidopsis thaliana ethylene receptor, ETR1, autophosphorylates in vitro on a conserved histidine residue (1). However, sequence comparisons between the five ethylene receptor family members suggest that subfamily 2 members do not have all the motifs necessary for histidine kinase activity. Further, a tobacco subfamily 2 receptor, NTHK1, autophosphorylates on serines and threonines in vitro (2). Here we show that all five Arabidopsis ethylene receptor proteins autophosphorylate in vitro. We analyzed the nature of the phosphorylated amino acids by acid/base stability and bi-dimensional thin layer electrophoresis and demonstrated that unlike ETR1 all other ethylene receptors autophosphorylate predominantly on serine residues. ERS1, the only other subfamily 1 receptor, is able to phosphorylate on both histidine and serine residues in the presence of Mn2+. However, histidine autophosphorylation is lost when ERS1 is assayed in the presence of both Mg2+ and Mn2+, suggesting that this activity may not occur in vivo. Furthermore, mutation of the histidine residue conserved in two-component systems does not abolish serine autophosphorylation, eliminating the possibility of a histidine to serine phosphotransfer. Our biochemical observations complement the recently published genetic data that histidine kinase activity is not necessary for ethylene receptor function in plants and suggest that ethylene signal transduction does not occur through a phosphorelay mechanism.     

Arabidopsis RTE1 is essential to ethylene receptor ETR1 amino-terminal signaling independent of CTR1

The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) ethylene receptor Ethylene Response1 (ETR1) can mediate the receptor signal output via its carboxyl terminus interacting with the amino (N) terminus of Constitutive Triple Response1 (CTR1) or via its N terminus (etr1^1-349 or the dominant ethylene-insensitive etr1-1^1-349) by an unknown mechanism. Given that CTR1 is essential to ethylene receptor signaling and that overexpression of Reversion To Ethylene Sensitivity1 (RTE1) promotes ETR1 N-terminal signaling, we evaluated the roles of CTR1 and RTE1 in ETR1 N-terminal signaling. The mutant phenotype of ctr1-1 and ctr1-2 was suppressed in part by the transgenes etr1^1-349 and etr1-1^1-349, with etr1-1^1-349 conferring ethylene insensitivity. Coexpression of 35S:RTE1 and etr1^1-349 conferred ethylene insensitivity in ctr1-1, whereas suppression of the ctr1-1 phenotype by etr1^1-349 was prevented by rte1-2. Thus, RTE1 was essential to ETR1 N-terminal signaling independent of the CTR1 pathway. An excess amount of the CTR1 N terminus CTR1^7-560 prevented ethylene receptor signaling, and the CTR1^7-560 overexpressor CTR1-Nox showed a constitutive ethylene response phenotype. Expression of the ETR1 N terminus suppressed the CTR1-Nox phenotype. etr1^1-349 restored the ethylene insensitivity conferred by dominant receptor mutant alleles in the ctr1-1 background. Therefore, ETR1 N-terminal signaling was not mediated by full-length ethylene receptors; rather, full-length ethylene receptors acted cooperatively with the ETR1 N terminus to mediate the receptor signal independent of CTR1. ETR1 N-terminal signaling may involve RTE1, receptor cooperation, and negative regulation by the ETR1 carboxyl terminus.The gaseous plant hormone ethylene is perceived by a small family of ethylene receptors. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) has five ethylene receptors that are structurally similar to prokaryotic two-component histidine kinase (HK) proteins. Mutants defective in multiple ethylene receptor genes show a constitutive ethylene response phenotype, which indicates a negative regulation of ethylene responses by the receptor genes (Hua and Meyerowitz, 1998).The receptor N terminus has three or four transmembrane domains that bind ethylene. The GAF (for cGMP-specific phosphodiesterases, adenylyl cyclases, and FhlA) domain, which follows the transmembrane helices, mediates noncovalent receptor heterodimerization and may have a role in receptor cooperation (Gamble et al., 2002; O’Malley et al., 2005; Xie et al., 2006; Gao et al., 2008). The subfamily I receptors Ethylene Response1 (ETR1) and Ethylene Response Sensor1 (ERS1) have a conserved HK domain following the GAF domain. For subfamily II members ETR2, Ethylene Insensitive4 (EIN4), and ERS2, the HK domain is less conserved, and they lack most signature motifs essential for HK activity (Chang et al., 1993; Gamble et al., 1998; Hua et al., 1998; Qu and Schaller, 2004; Xie et al., 2006). Among the five receptors, ETR1, ETR2, and EIN4 have a receiver domain following the HK domain. The ETR1 HK domain may have a role in mediating the receptor signal to downstream components, and the HK activity facilitates the ethylene signaling (Clark et al., 1998; Huang et al., 2003; Hall et al., 2012). The receiver domain can dimerize and could involve receptor cooperation (Müller-Dieckmann et al., 1999). However, differential receptor cooperation occurs between the receiver domain-lacking ERS1 and the other ethylene receptors, which does not support the hypothesis that the domains involve receptor cooperation (Liu and Wen, 2012).Acting downstream of the ethylene receptors is Constitutive Triple Response1 (CTR1), a MEK kinase (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase) with Ser/Thr kinase activity, and the kinase domain locates at the C terminus. The CTR1 N terminus does not share sequence similarity to known domains and can physically interact with the ethylene-receptor HK domain (Clark et al., 1998; Huang et al., 2003). ctr1 mutants showing attenuated CTR1 kinase activity or the ETR1-CTR1 association exhibit various degrees of the constitutive ethylene-response phenotype. For example, the ctr1-1 and ctr1^btk mutations result from the D694E and E626K substitutions, respectively, in the CTR1 kinase domain, and ctr1-1 shows a stronger ethylene-response phenotype than ctr1^btk, with ctr1-1 having much weaker kinase activity than ctr1^btk (Kieber et al., 1993; Huang et al., 2003; Ikeda et al., 2009). The ctr1-8 mutation results in the G354E substitution that prevents the ETR1-CTR1 association, and the mutant exhibits a constitutive ethylene-response phenotype. Overexpression of the CTR1 N terminus CTR1^7-560, which is responsible for interaction with ethylene receptors, leads to constitutive ethylene responses, possibly by titrating out available ethylene receptors (Kieber et al., 1993; Huang et al., 2003). These studies suggest that CTR1 kinase activity and the interaction of CTR1 with the receptor HK domain may be important to the ethylene receptor signal output in suppressing constitutive ethylene responses.Although the ETR1-CTR1 interaction via the HK domain is essential to the ethylene receptor signal output, evidence suggests that the ETR1 receptor signal output can also be independent of the HK activity or domain. The etr1 ers1 loss-of-function mutant displays extreme growth defects. The etr1[HGG] mutation inactivates ETR1 HK activity, and expression of the getr1[HGG] transgene rescues the etr1 ers1 growth defects, which indicates a lack of association of ETR1 receptor signaling and its kinase activity (Wang et al., 2003). The dominant etr1-1 mutation results in the C65Y substitution and confers ethylene insensitivity (Chang et al., 1993), and the expression of the HK domain-lacking etr1^1-349 and ethylene-insensitive etr1-1^1-349 isoforms partially suppresses the growth defects of etr1 ers1-2. Loss-of-function mutations of subfamily II members do not affect etr1-1^1-349 functions. Therefore, etr1-1^1-349 predominantly cooperates with subfamily I receptors to mediate the ethylene receptor signal output (Xie et al., 2006). Biochemical and transformation studies showing that ethylene receptors can form heterodimers and that each receptor is a component of high-molecular-mass complexes explain how ethylene receptors may act cooperatively (Gao et al., 2008; Gao and Schaller, 2009; Chen et al., 2010).Reversion To Ethylene Sensitivity1 (RTE1), a Golgi/endoplasmic reticulum protein, was isolated from a suppressor screen of the dominant ethylene-insensitive etr1-2 mutation. The cross-species complementation of the rte1-2 loss-of-function mutation by the rice (Oryza sativa) RTE Homolog1 (OsRTH1) suggests a conserved mechanism that modulates the ethylene receptor signaling across higher plant species (Zhang et al., 2012). RTE1 and OsRTH1 overexpression led to ethylene insensitivity in wild-type Arabidopsis but not the etr1-7 loss-of-function mutant, and expression of etr1^1-349 restored ethylene insensitivity with RTE1 overexpression in etr1-7 (Resnick et al., 2006; Zhou et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2010). Coimmunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged ETR1 and RTE1 and Trp fluorescence spectroscopy revealed the physical interaction of RTE1 and ETR1 (Zhou et al., 2007; Dong et al., 2008, 2010). Therefore, RTE1 may directly promote ETR1 receptor signal output through the ETR1 N terminus, but whether RTE1 has an essential role in ETR1 N-terminal signaling remains to be addressed.Currently, the biochemical nature of the ethylene receptor signal is unknown, and the underlying mechanisms of mediation of the ethylene receptor signal output remain uninvestigated. Genetic and biochemical studies suggest that activation of CTR1 by ethylene receptors may suppress constitutive ethylene responses; upon ethylene binding, the receptors are converted to an inactive state and fail to activate CTR1, and the suppression of ethylene responses by CTR1 is alleviated (Hua and Meyerowitz, 1998; Klee, 2004; Wang et al., 2006; Hall et al., 2007). However, this model does not address how the ETR1 N terminus, which does not have the CTR1-interacting site, mediates the receptor signal to suppress constitutive ethylene responses. The receptor signal of the truncated etr1 isoforms may be mediated by other full-length ethylene receptors and then activate CTR1; alternatively, the ETR1 N-terminal signal may be mediated by a pathway independent of CTR1 (Gamble et al., 2002; Qu and Schaller, 2004; Xie et al., 2006). Results showing that mutants defective in multiple ethylene receptor genes exhibit a more severe ethylene-response phenotype than ctr1 and that ctr1 mutants are responsive to ethylene support the presence of a CTR1-independent pathway (Hua and Meyerowitz, 1998; Cancel and Larsen, 2002; Huang et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2010).In this study, we investigated whether mediation of ETR1 N-terminal signaling is independent of CTR1 and whether RTE1 is essential to the CTR1-independent ETR1 N-terminal signaling. The ETR1 N-terminal signaling was not mediated via other full-length ethylene receptors, but the signal of full-length ethylene receptors could be mediated by the ETR1 N terminus independent of CTR1. The ETR1 C terminus may inhibit ETR1 N-terminal signaling, whereby deletion of the C terminus facilitates N-terminal signaling. We propose a model for the possible modulation of ETR1 receptor signaling.