Isolation and characterization of covalently cross-linked actin dimer

Covalently cross-linked actin dimer was isolated from rabbit skeletal muscle F-actin reacted with phenylenebismaleimide (Knight, P., and Offer, G. (1978) Biochem. J. 175, 1023-1032). The UV spectrum of the purified cross-linked actin dimer, in a nonpolymerizing buffer, was very similar to that of native F-actin and not to the spectrum of G-actin. Cross-linked actin dimer polymerized to filaments that were indistinguishable in the electron microscope from F-actin made from native G-actin and that were similar to native F-actin in their ability to activate the Mg2+-ATPase of myosin subfragment-1. The critical concentrations of polymerization of cross-linked actin dimer in 0.5 mM and 2.0 mM MgCl2, 2 to 4 microM, and 1 to 2 microM, respectively, were similar to the values for native G-actin. Cross-linked actin dimer contained 2 mol of bound nucleotide/mol of dimer. One bound nucleotide exchanged with ATP in solution with a t 1/2 of 55 min and with ADP with a t 1/2 of 5 h. The second bound nucleotide exchanged much more slowly. The more rapidly exchangeable site contained 10 to 15% bound ADP.Pi and 85 to 90% bound ATP while the second site contained much less, if any, bound ADP.Pi. Cross-linked actin dimer had an ATPase activity in 0.5 mM MgCl2 that was 7 times greater than the ATPase activity of native G-actin and that was also stimulated by cytochalasin D. These data are discussed in relation to the possible role of ATP in actin polymerization and function with the speculation that the cross-linked actin dimer may serve simultaneously as a useful model for each of the two different ends of native F-actin.     

Differences in the ionic interaction of actin with the motor domains of nonmuscle and muscle myosin II.

Changes in the actin-myosin interface are thought to play an important role in microfilament-linked cellular movements. In this study, we compared the actin binding properties of the motor domain of Dictyostelium discoideum (M765) and rabbit skeletal muscle myosin subfragment-1 (S1). The Dictyostelium motor domain resembles S1(A2) (S1 carrying the A2 light chain) in its interaction with G-actin. Similar to S1(A2), none of the Dictyostelium motor domain constructs induced G-actin polymerization. The affinity of monomeric actin (G-actin) was 20-fold lower for M765 than for S1(A2) but increasing the number of positive charges in the loop 2 region of the D. discoideum motor domain (residues 613-623) resulted in equivalent affinities of G-actin for M765 and for S1. Proteolytic cleavage and cross-linking approaches were used to show that M765, like S1, interacts via the loop 2 region with filamentous actin (F-actin). For both types of myosin, F-actin prevents trypsin cleavage in the loop 2 region and F-actin segment 1-28 can be cross-linked to loop 2 residues by a carbodiimide-induced reaction. In contrast with the S1, loop residues 559-565 of D. discoideum myosin was not cross-linked to F-actin, probably due to the lower number of positive charges. These results confirm the importance of the loop 2 region of myosin for the interaction with both G-actin and F-actin, regardless of the source of myosin. The differences observed in the way in which M765 and S1 interact with actin may be linked to more general differences in the structure of the actomyosin interface of muscle and nonmuscle myosins.     

Mapping the cofilin binding site on yeast G-actin by chemical cross-linking

Cofilin is a major cytoskeletal protein that binds to both monomeric actin (G-actin) and polymeric actin (F-actin) and is involved in microfilament dynamics. Although an atomic structure of the G-actin-cofilin complex does not exist, models of the complex have been built using molecular dynamics simulations, structural homology considerations, and synchrotron radiolytic footprinting data. The hydrophobic cleft between actin subdomains 1 and 3 and, alternatively, the cleft between actin subdomains 1 and 2 have been proposed as possible high-affinity cofilin binding sites. In this study, the proposed binding of cofilin to the subdomain 1/subdomain 3 region on G-actin has been probed using site-directed mutagenesis, fluorescence labeling, and chemical cross-linking, with yeast actin mutants containing single reactive cysteines in the actin hydrophobic cleft and with cofilin mutants carrying reactive cysteines in the regions predicted to bind to G-actin. Mass spectrometry analysis of the cross-linked complex revealed that cysteine 345 in subdomain 1 of mutant G-actin was cross-linked to native cysteine 62 on cofilin. A cofilin mutant that carried a cysteine substitution in the α3-helix (residue 95) formed a cross-link with residue 144 in actin subdomain 3. Distance constraints imposed by these cross-links provide experimental evidence for cofilin binding between actin subdomains 1 and 3 and fit a corresponding docking-based structure of the complex. The cross-linking of the N-terminal region of recombinant yeast cofilin to actin residues 346 and 374 with dithio-bis-maleimidoethane (12.4 Å) and via disulfide bond formation was also documented. This set of cross-linking data confirms the important role of the N-terminal segment of cofilin in interactions with G-actin.     

Isolation of an actin-binding protein from membranes of Dictyostelium discoideum

We prepared a probe of radiolabeled, glutaraldehyde cross-linked filamentous actin (F-actin) to study binding of actin to membranes of Dictyostelium discoideum. The probe bound to membranes or detergent extracts of membranes with a high affinity and in a saturable manner. The binding could be reduced by boiling of either the actin probe or the membranes, or by addition of excess native F-actin, but not by addition of an equivalent amount of bovine serum albumin, to the assay. The probe labeled several proteins when used to overlay sodium dodecyl sulfate gels of Dictyostelium membranes. One of these labeled proteins was a 24,000-mol-wt protein (p24), which was soluble only in the presence of a high concentration of sodium deoxycholate (5%, wt/vol) at room temperature or above. The p24 was purified by selective detergent extraction and column chromatography. When tested in a novel two-phase binding assay, p24 bound both native monomeric actin (G-actin) and F-actin in a specific manner. In this assay, G-actin bound p24 with a submicromolar affinity.     

Inhibition of sliding movement of F-actin by crosslinking emphasizes the role of actin structure in the mechanism of motility

The effects of crosslinking of monomeric and polymeric actin with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC), disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) and glutaraldehyde on the interaction with heavy meromyosin (HMM) in solution and on the sliding movement on glass-attached HMM were examined. The Vmax values of actin-activated HMM ATPase decreased in the following order: intact actin = EDC F-actin greater than DSS actin greater than glutaraldehyde F-actin = glutaraldehyde G-actin greater than EDC G-actin. The affinity of actin for HMM in the presence of ATP decreased in the following order: DSS actin greater than glutaraldehyde F-actin = glutaraldehyde G-actin greater than intact actin greater than EDC F-actin greater than EDC G-actin. However, sliding movement was inhibited only in the case of glutaraldehyde-crosslinked F and G-actin and EDC-crosslinked G-actin. Interestingly, after copolymerization of "non-motile" glutaraldehyde or EDC-crosslinked monomers with "motile" monomers of intact actin sliding of the copolymers was observed and its rate was independent of the type of crosslinked monomer, i.e. of the manner of their interaction with HMM. These data strongly indicate that inhibition of the sliding of actin by crosslinking cannot be explained entirely by changes in the Vmax value or affinity for myosin heads. We conclude that movement is generated by interaction of myosin with segments of F-actin containing a number of intact monomers, and the mechanism of inhibition involves an effect of the crosslinkers on the structure of F-actin itself.     

Membrane-associated actin from the microvillar membranes of ascites tumor cells

A membrane fraction (MF2) has been purified from isolated microvilli of the MAT-C1 subline of the 13762 rat mammary ascites adenocarcinoma under conditions which cause F-actin depolymerization. This membrane preparation contains actin as a major component, although no filamentous structures are observed by transmission electron microscopy. Membranes were extracted with a Triton X-100-containing actin-stabilizing buffer (S buffer) or actin-destabilizing buffer (D buffer). In D buffer greater than 90% of metabolically labeled protein and glycoprotein was extracted, and 80-90% of these labeled species was extracted in S buffer. When S buffer extracts of MF2 were fractionated by either gel filtration on Sepharose 6 B or rate-zonal sucrose density gradient centrifugation, most of the actin was found to be intermediate in size between G- and F-actin. In D buffer most of the MF2 actin behaved as G-actin. Extraction and gel filtration of intact microvilli in S buffer also showed the presence of the intermediate form of actin, indicating that it did not arise during membrane preparation. When [35S]methionine-labeled G-actin from ascites cells was added to S buffer extracts of MF2 and chromatographed, all of the radioactivity chromatographed as G-actin, indicating that the intermediate form of actin did not result from an association of G-actin molecules during extraction or chromatography. The results of this study suggest that the microvillar membrane fraction is enriched in an intermediate form of actin smaller than F-actin and larger than G-actin.     

The quantitation of G- and F-actin in cultured cells

An improved method to quantitate the amounts of filamentous (F-actin) and monomeric (globular) actin (G-actin) in cultured cells was developed. Cells are lysed into a myosin-containing buffer and F-actin is removed by centrifugation. The pelleted F-actin is then depolymerized to G-actin in a 1 mM ATP-containing buffer for 1 h before measuring the levels of G-actin using the DNase I inhibition assay. Partitioning of G-actin in the supernatant (greater than 95%) and recovery of actin in both fractions (greater than 85%) were measured by adding [3H]actin to cultured cells. Actin in the separated fractions is stable for at least 72 h at 0 degree C. Asynchronous monolayer cultures of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells contain 2.5 +/- 0.2% of the total protein as actin with 72.4 +/- 5.7% as F-actin. About 10% of this F-actin is not associated with the readily sedimented Triton-cytoskeleton. CHO cells grown in suspension contain 55.8% of the actin as F-actin; following plating about 90 min is required for these cells to flatten and for the F-actin level to reach the monolayer value of about 70%.     

Gln-41 is intermolecularly cross-linked to Lys-113 in F-actin by N-(4-azidobenzoyl)-putrescine.

The bifunctional reagent N-(4-azidobenzoyl)-putrescine was synthesized and covalently bound to rabbit skeletal muscle actin. The incorporation was mediated by guinea pig liver transglutaminase under conditions similar to those described by Takashi (1988, Biochemistry 27, 938-943); up to 0.5 M/M were incorporated into G-actin, whereas F-actin was refractory to incorporation. Peptide fractionation showed that at least 90% of the label was bound to Gln-41. The labeled G-actin was polymerized, and irradiation of the F-actin led to covalent intermolecular cross-linking. A cross-linked peptide complex was isolated from a tryptic digest of the cross-linked actin in which digestion was limited to arginine; sequence analysis as well as mass spectrometry indicated that the linked peptides contained residues 40-62 and residues 96-116, and that the actual cross-link was between Gln-41 and Lys-113. Thus the gamma-carboxyl group of Gln-41 must be within 10.7 A of the side chain (probably the amino group) of Lys-113 in an adjacent actin monomer. In the atomic model for F-actin proposed by Holmes et al. (1990, Nature 347, 44-49), the alpha-carbons of these residues in adjacent monomers along the two-start helices are sufficiently close to permit cross-linking of their side chains, and, pending atomic resolution of the side chains, the results presented here seem to support the proposed model.     

Activation of heavy meromyosin adenosine triphosphatase by various states of actin.

F-actin monomer (F-monomer) is formed upon the addition of neutral salt to G-actin. Since F-monomer has a digestibility similar to that of F-actin and much lower than that of G-actin, it has been proposed that F-monomer has a conformation different from that of G-actin and similar to the conformation of the subunits in F-actin. To examine whether F-monomer will enhance the magnesium-activated myosin adenosine triphosphatase (Mg2+-ATPase) as much as F-actin, the ability of partially polymerized actin populations at equilibrium to activate the Mg2+-ATPase of heavy meromyosin was investigated. Correlations were made between ATPase activities and the polymerization state of actin as determined by measurements of viscosity and digestibility. No significant activation of the heavy meromyosin ATPase was observed under conditions where G-actin or mixtures of G-actin and F-monomer were present. As polymer formation occurred at higher actin concentrations, or with increased KCl concentrations, substantial activation characteristic of F-actin was observed. The data suggest that F-monomer may undergo a further conformational change as it forms nuclei or joins onto polymers. Alternatively, the site of actin which activates the myosin ATPase may involve the crevice between two adjacent actin subunits.     

Change in the actin-myosin subfragment 1 interaction during actin polymerization

To better characterize the conformational differences of G- and F-actin, we have compared the interaction between G- and F-actin with myosin subfragment 1 (S1) which had part of its F-actin binding site (residues 633-642) blocked by a complementary peptide or "antipeptide" (Chaussepied, P., and Morales, M. F. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 7471-7475). Light scattering, sedimentation, and electron microscopy measurements showed that, with the antipeptide covalently attached to the S1 heavy chain, S1 was not capable of inducing G-actin polymerization in the absence of salt. Moreover, the antipeptide-carrying S1 did not change the fluorescence polarization of 5-[2-(iodoacetyl)-aminoethyl]aminonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (1,5-IAEDANS)-labeled G-actin or of 1,5-IAEDANS-labeled actin dimer, compared to the control S1. This result, interpreted as a lack of interaction between G-actin and antipeptide-carrying S1, was confirmed further by the following experiments: in the presence of G-actin, antipeptide.S1 heavy chain was not protected against trypsin and papain proteolysis, and G-actin could not be cross-linked to antipeptide.S1 by 1-ethyl-3[-3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide. In contrast, similar experiments showed that antipeptide.S1 was able to interact with nascent F-actin and with F-actin. Thus, blocking the stretch 633-642 of S1 heavy chain by the antipeptide strongly inhibits G-actin-S1 interaction but only slightly alters F-actin-S1 contact. We, therefore postulate that this stretch of skeletal S1 heavy chain is essential for G-actin-S1 interaction and that the G-F transformation generates new S1 binding site(s) on the actin molecule.     

The viscoelastic properties of actin solutions

The viscoelastic properties in actin solutions were investigated by measuring their elastic modulus and viscous modulus using a rheometer. The polymerization/gelation process of actin solutions was accompanied by an increase of both parameters, indicating the formation of a protein network. High shear rotational motion destroyed this network which, however, would reanneal if left undisturbed. At 25 °C under low ionic strength conditions, the viscoelastic moduli of a Spudich-Watt globular (G) actin preparation increased with time, while G-actin, purified by gel filtration maintained low viscoelastic moduli. The rigidity of the filamentous (F) actin network in a solution of Spudich-Watt actin, measured by the elastic modulus, was somewhat lower than that of gel-filtration-purified actin at the same protein concentration. The crosslink density of these F-actin networks was estimated, using models from rubber elasticity theory. The calculated density was 1 crosslink/50 actin monomers for the purified actin and 1 crosslink/120 actin monomers for Spudich-Watt actin. The results are consistent with the idea that a small amount of regulatory factor(s), which could be removed by the gel filtration step, modulates the structure of an actin network.     

Polymerisation of chemically cross-linked actin:thymosin beta(4) complex to filamentous actin: alteration in helical parameters and visualisation of thymosin beta(4) binding on F-actin.

The beta-thymosins are intracellular monomeric (G-)actin sequestering proteins forming 1:1 complexes with G-actin. Here, we analysed the interaction of thymosin beta(4) with F-actin. Thymosin beta(4) at 200 microM was chemically cross-linked to F-actin. In the presence of phalloidin, the chemically cross-linked actin:thymosin beta(4) complex was incorporated into F-actin. These mixed filaments were of normal appearance when inspected by conventional transmission electron microscopy after negative staining. We purified the chemically cross-linked actin:thymosin beta(4) complex, which polymerised only when phalloidin and the gelsolin:2-actin complex were present simultaneously. Using scanning transmission electron microscopy, the mass-per-length of control and actin:thymosin beta(4) filaments was found to be 16.0(+/-0.8) kDa/nm and 18.0(+/-0.9) kDa/nm, respectively, indicating an increase in subunit mass of 5.4 kDa. Analysis of the helical parameters revealed an increase of the crossover spacing of the two right-handed long-pitch helical strands from 36.0 to 40.5 nm. Difference map analysis of 3-D helical reconstruction of control and actin:thymosin beta(4) filaments yielded an elongated extra mass. Qualitatively, the overall size and shape of the difference mass were compatible with published data of the atomic structure of thymosin beta(4). The deduced binding sites of thymosin beta(4) to actin were in agreement with those identified previously. However, parts of the difference map might represent subtle conformational changes of both proteins occurring upon complex formation.     

Stable interaction between G-actin and neurofilament light subunit in dopaminergic neurons

Excessive accumulation of neurofilaments in the cell bodies and proximal axons of motor neurons is a major pathological hallmark of motor neuron diseases. In this communication we provide evidence that the neurofilament light subunit (68 kDa) and G-actin are capable of forming a stable interaction. Cytochalasin B, a cytoskeleton disrupting agent that interrupts actin-based microfilaments, caused aggregation of neurofilaments in cultured mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons, suggesting a possible interaction between neurofilaments and actin; which was tested further by using crosslinking reaction and affinity chromatography techniques. In the cross-linking experiment, G-actin interacted with individual neurofilament subunits and covalently cross-linked disuccinimidyl suberate, a homobifunctional cross-linking reagent. Furthermore, G-actin was extensively cross-linked to the light neurofilament subunit with this reagent. The other two neurofilament subunits showed no cross-linking to G-actin. Moreover, neurofilament subunits were retained on a G-actin coupled affinity column and were eluted from this column by increasing salt concentration. All three neurofilament subunits became bound to the G-actin affinity column. However, a portion of the 160 and 200 kDa neurofilament subunits did not bind to the column, and the remainder of these two subunits eluted prior to the 68 kDa subunit, suggesting that the light subunit exhibited the highest affinity for G-actin. Moreover, neurofilaments demonstrated little or no binding to F-actin coupled affinity columns. The phosphorylation of neurofilament proteins with protein kinase C reduced its cross-linking to G-actin. The results of these studies are interpreted to suggest that the interaction between neurofilaments and actin, regulated by neurofilament phosphorylation, may play a role in maintaining the structure and hence the function of dopaminergic neurons in culture.     

Effect of Hypothyroidism on Different Forms of Actin in Rat Cerebral Neuronal Cultures Studied by an Improved DNase I Inhibition Assay

An improved DNase I inhibition assay for the filamentous actin (F-actin) and monomeric actin (G-actin) in brain cells has been developed. Unlike other methods, the cell lysis conditions and postlysis treatments, established by us, inhibited the temporal inactivation of actin in the cell lysate and maintained a stable F-actin/G-actin ratio for at least 4-5 h after lysis. The new procedure allowed separate quantitation of the noncytoskeletal F-actin in the Triton-soluble fraction (12,000 g, 10 min supernatant) that did not readily sediment with the Triton-insoluble cytoskeletal F-actin (12,000 g, 10 min pellet). We have applied this modified assay system to study the effect of hypothyroidism on different forms of actin using primary cultures of neurons derived from cerebra of neonatal normal and hypothyroid rats. Our results showed a 20% increase in the Triton-insoluble cytoskeletal F-actin in cultures from hypothyroid brain relative to normal controls. In the Triton-soluble fraction, containing the G-actin and the noncytoskeletal F-actin, cultures from hypothyroid brain showed a 15% increase in G-actin, whereas the F-actin remained unaltered. The 10% increase in total actin observed in this fraction from hypothyroid brain could be totally accounted for by the enhancement of G-actin. The mean F-actin/G-actin ratio in this fraction was about 30% higher in the cultures from normal brain compared to that of the hypothyroid system, which indicates that hypothyroidism tends to decrease the proportion of noncytoskeletal F-actin relative to G-actin.     

Hyper-mobility of water around actin filaments revealed using pulse-field gradient spin-echo 1H NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy

This paper reports that water molecules around F-actin, a polymerized form of actin, are more mobile than those around G-actin or in bulk water. A measurement using pulse-field gradient spin-echo (1)H NMR showed that the self-diffusion coefficient of water in aqueous F-actin solution increased with actin concentration by ～5%, whereas that in G-actin solution was close to that of pure water. This indicates that an F-actin/water interaction is responsible for the high self-diffusion of water. The local viscosity around actin was also investigated by fluorescence measurements of Cy3, a fluorescent dye, conjugated to Cys 374 of actin. The steady-state fluorescence anisotropy of Cy3 attached to F-actin was 0.270, which was lower than that for G-actin, 0.334. Taking into account the fluorescence lifetimes of the Cy3 bound to actin, their rotational correlation times were estimated to be 3.8 and 9.1ns for F- and G-actin, respectively. This indicates that Cy3 bound to F-actin rotates more freely than that bound to G-actin, and therefore the local water viscosity is lower around F-actin than around G-actin.     

Conformational dynamics of loop 262-274 in G- and F-actin

According to the original Holmes model of F-actin structure, the hydrophobic loop 262-274 stabilizes the actin filament by inserting into a pocket formed at the interface between two protomers on the opposing strand. Using a yeast actin triple mutant, L180C/L269C/C374A [(LC)(2)CA], we showed previously that locking the hydrophobic loop to the G-actin surface by a disulfide bridge prevents filament formation. We report here that the hydrophobic loop is mobile in F- as well as in G-actin, fluctuating between the extended and parked conformations. Copper-catalyzed, brief air oxidation of (LC)(2)CA F-actin on electron microscopy grids resulted in the severing of thin filaments and their conversion to amorphous aggregates. Disulfide, bis(methanethiosulfonate) (MTS), and dibromobimane (DBB) cross-linking reactions proceeded in solution at a faster rate with G- than with F-actin. Cross-linking of C180 to C269 by DBB (4.4 A) in either G- or F-actin resulted in shorter and less stable filaments. The cross-linking with a longer MTS-6 reagent (9.6 A) did not impair actin polymerization or filament structure. Myosin subfragment 1 (S1) and tropomyosin inhibited the disulfide cross-linking of phalloidin-stabilized F-actin. Electron paramagnetic resonance measurements with nitroxide spin-labeled actin revealed strong spin-spin coupling and a similar mean interspin distance ( approximately 10 A) in G- and in F-actin, with a broader distance distribution in G-actin. These results show loop 262-274 fluctuations in G- and F-actin and correlate loop dynamics with actin filament formation and stability.     

Intermolecular coupling between loop 38-52 and the C-terminus in actin filaments.

The recently reported structural connectivity in F-actin between the DNase I binding loop on actin (residues 38-52) and the C-terminus region was investigated by fluorescence and proteolytic digestion methods. The binding of copper to Cys-374 on F- but not G-actin quenched the fluorescence of dansyl ethylenediamine (DED) attached to Gin-41 by more than 50%. The blocking of copper binding to DED-actin by N-ethylmaleimide labeling of Cys-374 on actin abolished the fluorescence quenching. The quenching of DED-actin fluorescence was restored in copolymers (1:9) of N-ethylmaleimide-DED-actin with unlabeled actin. The quenching of DED-actin fluorescence by copper was also abolished in copolymers (1:4) of DED-actin and N-ethylmaleimide-actin. These results show intermolecular coupling between loop 38-52 and the C-terminus in F-actin. Consistent with this, the rate of subtilisin cleavage of actin at loop 38-52 was increased by the bound copper by more than 10-fold in F-actin but not in G-actin. Neither acto-myosin subfragment-1 (S1) ATPase activity nor the tryptic digestion of G-actin and F-actin at the Lys-61 and Lys-69 sites were affected by the bound copper. These observations suggest that copper binding to Cys-374 does not induce extensive changes in actin structure and that the perturbation of loop 38-52 environment results from changes in the intermolecular contacts in F-actin.     

Hyper-mobility of water around actin filaments revealed using pulse-field gradient spin-echo H NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy

This paper reports that water molecules around F-actin, a polymerized form of actin, are more mobile than those around G-actin or in bulk water. A measurement using pulse-field gradient spin-echo ¹H NMR showed that the self-diffusion coefficient of water in aqueous F-actin solution increased with actin concentration by ∼5%, whereas that in G-actin solution was close to that of pure water. This indicates that an F-actin/water interaction is responsible for the high self-diffusion of water. The local viscosity around actin was also investigated by fluorescence measurements of Cy3, a fluorescent dye, conjugated to Cys 374 of actin. The steady-state fluorescence anisotropy of Cy3 attached to F-actin was 0.270, which was lower than that for G-actin, 0.334. Taking into account the fluorescence lifetimes of the Cy3 bound to actin, their rotational correlation times were estimated to be 3.8 and 9.1 ns for F- and G-actin, respectively. This indicates that Cy3 bound to F-actin rotates more freely than that bound to G-actin, and therefore the local water viscosity is lower around F-actin than around G-actin.     

Implications of oxidovanadium(IV) binding to actin

Oxidovanadium(IV), a cationic species (VO²⁺) of vanadium(IV), binds to several proteins, including actin. Upon titration with oxidovanadium(IV), approximately 100% quenching of the intrinsic fluorescence of monomeric actin purified from rabbit skeletal muscle (G-actin) was observed, with a V₅₀ of 131 μM, whereas for the polymerized form of actin (F-actin) 75% of quenching was obtained and a V₅₀ value of 320 μM. Stern-Volmer plots were used to estimate an oxidovanadium(IV)-actin dissociation constant, with K_d of 8.2 μM and 64.1 μM VOSO₄, for G-actin and F-actin, respectively. These studies reveal the presence of a high affinity binding site for oxidovanadium(IV) in actin, producing local conformational changes near the tryptophans most accessible to water in the three-dimensional structure of actin. The actin conformational changes, also confirmed by ¹H NMR, are accompanied by changes in G-actin hydrophobic surface, but not in F-actin. The ¹H NMR spectra of G-actin treated with oxidovanadium(IV) clearly indicates changes in the resonances ascribed to methyl group and aliphatic regions as well as to aromatics and peptide-bond amide region. In parallel, it was verified that oxidovanadium(IV) prevents the G-actin polymerization into F-actin. In the 0-200 μM range, VOSO₄ inhibits 40% of the extent of polymerization with an IC₅₀ of 15.1 μM, whereas 500 μM VOSO₄ totally suppresses actin polymerization. The data strongly suggest that oxidovanadium(IV) binds to actin at specific binding sites preventing actin polymerization. By affecting actin structure and function, oxidovanadium(IV) might be responsible for many cellular effects described for vanadium.