RNase activity of polynucleotide phosphorylase is critical at low temperature in Escherichia coli and is complemented by RNase II

In Escherichia coli, the cold shock response is exerted upon a temperature change from 37°C to 15°C and is characterized by induction of several cold shock proteins, including polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), during acclimation phase. In E. coli, PNPase is essential for growth at low temperatures; however, its exact role in this essential function has not been fully elucidated. PNPase is a 3′-to-5′ exoribonuclease and promotes the processive degradation of RNA. Our screening of an E. coli genomic library for an in vivo counterpart of PNPase that can compensate for its absence at low temperature revealed only one protein, another 3′-to-5′ exonuclease, RNase II. Here we show that the RNase PH domains 1 and 2 of PNPase are important for its cold shock function, suggesting that the RNase activity of PNPase is critical for its essential function at low temperature. We also show that its polymerization activity is dispensable in its cold shock function. Interestingly, the third 3′-to-5′ processing exoribonuclease, RNase R of E. coli, which is cold inducible, cannot complement the cold shock function of PNPase. We further show that this difference is due to the different targets of these enzymes and stabilization of some of the PNPase-sensitive mRNAs, like fis, in the Δpnp cells has consequences, such as accumulation of ribosomal subunits in the Δpnp cells, which may play a role in the cold sensitivity of this strain.     

Dimeric assembly of human Suv3 helicase promotes its RNA unwinding function in mitochondrial RNA degradosome for RNA decay

Human Suv3 is a unique homodimeric helicase that constitutes the major component of the mitochondrial degradosome to work cooperatively with exoribonuclease PNPase for efficient RNA decay. However, the molecular mechanism of how Suv3 is assembled into a homodimer to unwind RNA remains elusive. Here, we show that dimeric Suv3 preferentially binds to and unwinds DNA–DNA, DNA–RNA, and RNA–RNA duplexes with a long 3′ overhang (≥10 nucleotides). The C‐terminal tail (CTT)‐truncated Suv3 (Suv3ΔC) becomes a monomeric protein that binds to and unwinds duplex substrates with ~six to sevenfold lower activities relative to dimeric Suv3. Only dimeric Suv3, but not monomeric Suv3ΔC, binds RNA independently of ATP or ADP, and is capable of interacting with PNPase, indicating that dimeric Suv3 assembly ensures its continuous association with RNA and PNPase during ATP hydrolysis cycles for efficient RNA degradation. We further determined the crystal structure of the apo‐form of Suv3ΔC, and SAXS structures of dimeric Suv3 and PNPase–Suv3 complex, showing that dimeric Suv3 caps on the top of PNPase via interactions with S1 domains, and forms a dumbbell‐shaped degradosome complex with PNPase. Overall, this study reveals that Suv3 is assembled into a dimeric helicase by its CTT for efficient and persistent RNA binding and unwinding to facilitate interactions with PNPase, promote RNA degradation, and maintain mitochondrial genome integrity and homeostasis.     

Crystal structure of Caulobacter crescentus polynucleotide phosphorylase reveals a mechanism of RNA substrate channelling and RNA degradosome assembly

Polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) is an exoribonuclease that cleaves single-stranded RNA substrates with 3'-5' directionality and processive behaviour. Its ring-like, trimeric architecture creates a central channel where phosphorolytic active sites reside. One face of the ring is decorated with RNA-binding K-homology (KH) and S1 domains, but exactly how these domains help to direct the 3' end of single-stranded RNA substrates towards the active sites is an unsolved puzzle. Insight into this process is provided by our crystal structures of RNA-bound and apo Caulobacter crescentus PNPase. In the RNA-free form, the S1 domains adopt a 'splayed' conformation that may facilitate capture of RNA substrates. In the RNA-bound structure, the three KH domains collectively close upon the RNA and direct the 3' end towards a constricted aperture at the entrance of the central channel. The KH domains make non-equivalent interactions with the RNA, and there is a marked asymmetry within the catalytic core of the enzyme. On the basis of these data, we propose that structural non-equivalence, induced upon RNA binding, helps to channel substrate to the active sites through mechanical ratcheting. Structural and biochemical analyses also reveal the basis for PNPase association with RNase E in the multi-enzyme RNA degradosome assembly of the α-proteobacteria.     

CvfA Protein and Polynucleotide Phosphorylase Act in an Opposing Manner to Regulate Staphylococcus aureus Virulence

We previously identified CvfA (SA1129) as a Staphylococcus aureus virulence factor using a silkworm infection model. S. aureus cvfA-deleted mutants exhibit decreased expression of the agr locus encoding a positive regulator of hemolysin genes and decreased hemolysin production. CvfA protein hydrolyzes a 2′,3′-cyclic phosphodiester bond at the RNA 3′ terminus, producing RNA with a 3′-phosphate (3′-phosphorylated RNA, RNA with a 3′-phosphate). Here, we report that the cvfA-deleted mutant phenotype (decreased agr expression and hemolysin production) was suppressed by disrupting pnpA-encoding polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) with 3′- to 5′-exonuclease activity. The suppression was blocked by introducing a pnpA-encoding PNPase with exonuclease activity but not by a pnpA-encoding mutant PNPase without exonuclease activity. Therefore, loss of PNPase exonuclease activity suppressed the cvfA-deleted mutant phenotype. Purified PNPase efficiently degraded RNA with 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate at the 3′ terminus (2′,3′-cyclic RNA), but it inefficiently degraded 3′-phosphorylated RNA. These findings indicate that 3′-phosphorylated RNA production from 2′,3′-cyclic RNA by CvfA prevents RNA degradation by PNPase and contributes to the expression of agr and hemolysin genes. We speculate that in the cvfA-deleted mutant, 2′,3′-cyclic RNA is not converted to the 3′-phosphorylated form and is efficiently degraded by PNPase, resulting in the loss of RNA essential for expressing agr and hemolysin genes, whereas in the cvfA/pnpA double-disrupted mutant, 2′,3′-cyclic RNA is not degraded by PNPase, leading to hemolysin production. These findings suggest that CvfA and PNPase competitively regulate RNA degradation essential for S. aureus virulence.     

Bacillus subtilis polynucleotide phosphorylase 3′-to-5′ DNase activity is involved in DNA repair

In the presence of Mn²⁺, an activity in a preparation of purified Bacillus subtilis RecN degrades single-stranded (ss) DNA with a 3′ → 5′ polarity. This activity is not associated with RecN itself, because RecN purified from cells lacking polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) does not show the exonuclease activity. We show here that, in the presence of Mn²⁺ and low-level inorganic phosphate (P_i), PNPase degrades ssDNA. The limited end-processing of DNA is regulated by ATP and is inactive in the presence of Mg²⁺ or high-level P_i. In contrast, the RNase activity of PNPase requires Mg²⁺ and P_i, suggesting that PNPase degradation of RNA and ssDNA occur by mutually exclusive mechanisms. A null pnpA mutation (ΔpnpA) is not epistatic with ΔrecA, but is epistatic with ΔrecN and Δku, which by themselves are non-epistatic. The addA5, ΔrecO, ΔrecQ (ΔrecJ), ΔrecU and ΔrecG mutations (representative of different epistatic groups), in the context of ΔpnpA, demonstrate gain- or loss-of-function by inactivation of repair-by-recombination, depending on acute or chronic exposure to the damaging agent and the nature of the DNA lesion. Our data suggest that PNPase is involved in various nucleic acid metabolic pathways, and its limited ssDNA exonuclease activity plays an important role in RecA-dependent and RecA-independent repair pathways.     

Nucleic acid and protein factors involved in Escherichia coli polynucleotide phosphorylase function on RNA

It has been reported that polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) binds to RNA via KH and S1 domains, and at least two main complexes (I and II) have been observed in RNA-binding assays. Here we describe PNPase binding to RNA, the factors involved in this activity and the nature of the interactions observed in vitro. Our results show that RNA length and composition affect PNPase binding, and that PNPase interacts primarily with the 3′ end of RNA, forming the complex I-RNA, which contains trimeric units of PNPase. When the 5′ end of RNA is blocked by a hybridizing oligonucleotide, the formation of complex II-RNA is inhibited. In addition, PNPase was found to form high molecular weight (>440 kDa) aggregates in vitro in the absence of RNA, which may correspond to the hexameric form of the enzyme. We confirmed that PNPase in vitro RNA binding, degradation and polyadenylation activities depend on the integrity of KH and S1 domains. These results can explain the defective in vivo autoregulation of PNPase71, a KH point substitution mutant. As previously reported, optimal growth of a cold-sensitive strain at 18 °C requires a fully active PNPase, however, we show that overexpression of a novel PNPaseΔS1 partially compensated the growth impairment of this strain, while PNPase71 showed a minor compensation effect. Finally, we propose a mechanism of PNPase interactions and discuss their implications in PNPase function.     

A duplicated fold is the structural basis for polynucleotide phosphorylase catalytic activity, processivity, and regulation

BACKGROUND: Polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) is a polyribonucleotide nucleotidyl transferase (E.C.2.7.7.8) that degrades mRNA in prokaryotes. Streptomyces antibioticus PNPase also assays as a guanosine 3'-diphosphate 5'-triphosphate (pppGpp) synthetase (E.C.2.7.6.5). It may function to coordinate changes in mRNA lifetimes with pppGpp levels during the Streptomyces lifecycle. RESULTS: The structure of S. antibioticus PNPase without bound RNA but with the phosphate analog tungstate bound at the PNPase catalytic sites was determined by X-ray crystallography and shows a trimeric multidomain protein with a central channel. The structural core has a novel duplicated architecture formed by association of two homologous domains. The tungstate derivative structure reveals the PNPase active site in the second of these core domains. Structure-based sequence analysis suggests that the pppGpp synthetase active site is located in the first core domain. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first structure of a PNPase and shows the structural basis for the trimer assembly, the arrangement of accessory RNA binding domains, and the likely catalytic residues of the PNPase active site. A possible function of the trimer channel is as a contribution to both the processivity of degradation and the regulation of PNPase action by RNA structural elements.     

Structural framework for the mechanism of archaeal exosomes in RNA processing

Exosomes emerge as central 3'-->5' RNA processing and degradation machineries in eukaryotes and archaea. We determined crystal structures of two 230 kDa nine subunit archaeal exosome isoforms. Both exosome isoforms contain a hexameric ring of RNase phosphorolytic (PH) domain subunits with a central chamber. Tungstate soaks identified three phosphorolytic active sites in this processing chamber. A trimer of Csl4 or Rrp4 subunits forms a multidomain macromolecular interaction surface on the RNase-PH domain ring with central S1 domains and peripheral KH and zinc-ribbon domains. Structural and mutational analyses suggest that the S1 domains and a subsequent neck in the RNase-PH domain ring form an RNA entry pore to the processing chamber that only allows access of unstructured RNA. This structural framework can mechanistically unify observed features of exosomes, including processive degradation of unstructured RNA, the requirement for regulatory factors to degrade structured RNA, and left-over tails in rRNA trimming.     

RNR1, a 3'-5' exoribonuclease belonging to the RNR superfamily, catalyzes 3' maturation of chloroplast ribosomal RNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana

Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts contain at least two 3′ to 5′ exoribonucleases, polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) and an RNase R homolog (RNR1). PNPase has been implicated in both mRNA and 23S rRNA 3′ processing. However, the observed maturation defects do not affect chloroplast translation, suggesting that the overall role of PNPase in maturation of chloroplast rRNA is not essential. Here, we show that this role can be largely ascribed to RNR1, for which homozygous mutants germinate only on sucrose-containing media, and have white cotyledons and pale green rosette leaves. Accumulation of chloroplast-encoded mRNAs and tRNAs is unaffected in such mutants, suggesting that RNR1 activity is either unnecessary or redundant for their processing and turnover. However, accumulation of several chloroplast rRNA species is severely affected. High-resolution RNA gel blot analysis, and mapping of 5′ and 3′ ends, revealed that RNR1 is involved in the maturation of 23S, 16S and 5S rRNAs. The 3′ extensions of the accumulating 5S rRNA precursors can be efficiently removed in vitro by purified RNR1, consistent with this view. Our data suggest that decreased accumulation of mature chloroplast ribosomal RNAs leads to a reduction in the number of translating ribosomes, ultimately compromising chloroplast protein abundance and thus plant growth and development.     

Crystal structure of human polynucleotide phosphorylase: insights into its domain function in RNA binding and degradation

Human polynucleotide phosphorylase (hPNPase) is a 3′-to-5′ exoribonuclease that degrades specific mRNA and miRNA, and imports RNA into mitochondria, and thus regulates diverse physiological processes, including cellular senescence and homeostasis. However, the RNA-processing mechanism by hPNPase, particularly how RNA is bound via its various domains, remains obscure. Here, we report the crystal structure of an S1 domain-truncated hPNPase at a resolution of 2.1 Å. The trimeric hPNPase has a hexameric ring-like structure formed by six RNase PH domains, capped with a trimeric KH pore. Our biochemical and mutagenesis studies suggest that the S1 domain is not critical for RNA binding, and conversely, that the conserved GXXG motif in the KH domain directly participates in RNA binding in hPNPase. Our studies thus provide structural and functional insights into hPNPase, which uses a KH pore to trap a long RNA 3′ tail that is further delivered into an RNase PH channel for the degradation process. Structural RNA with short 3′ tails are, on the other hand, transported but not digested by hPNPase.     

Running rings around RNA: a superfamily of phosphate-dependent RNases.

The exosome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the degradosome of Escherichia coli are multienzyme complexes involved in the degradation of mRNA. Both contain enzymes that are similar to the phosphate-dependent exoribonuclease RNase PH. These enzymes are phosphorylases that degrade RNA from the 3'-end. A recent X-ray crystallographic study of the polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) from Streptomyces antibioticus reveals, for the first time, the atomic structure of a member of the RNase PH superfamily. Here, information from the structure of PNPase is used to address two related issues. First, the structure supports the idea that PNPase, which is a trimer of multidomain subunits, arose by duplication of a gene encoding an RNase PH-like enzyme. Second, the structure might explain how RNase PH-like enzymes associate into oligomeric rings that degrade RNA in a processive reaction.     

Interplay of Mre11 Nuclease with Dna2 plus Sgs1 in Rad51-Dependent Recombinational Repair

The Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex initiates IR repair by binding to the end of a double-strand break, resulting in 5′ to 3′ exonuclease degradation creating a single-stranded 3′ overhang competent for strand invasion into the unbroken chromosome. The nuclease(s) involved are not well understood. Mre11 encodes a nuclease, but it has 3′ to 5′, rather than 5′ to 3′ activity. Furthermore, mutations that inactivate only the nuclease activity of Mre11 but not its other repair functions, mre11-D56N and mre11-H125N, are resistant to IR. This suggests that another nuclease can catalyze 5′ to 3′ degradation. One candidate nuclease that has not been tested to date because it is encoded by an essential gene is the Dna2 helicase/nuclease. We recently reported the ability to suppress the lethality of a dna2Δ with a pif1Δ. The dna2Δ pif1Δ mutant is IR-resistant. We have determined that dna2Δ pif1Δ mre11-D56N and dna2Δ pif1Δ mre11-H125N strains are equally as sensitive to IR as mre11Δ strains, suggesting that in the absence of Dna2, Mre11 nuclease carries out repair. The dna2Δ pif1Δ mre11-D56N triple mutant is complemented by plasmids expressing Mre11, Dna2 or dna2K1080E, a mutant with defective helicase and functional nuclease, demonstrating that the nuclease of Dna2 compensates for the absence of Mre11 nuclease in IR repair, presumably in 5′ to 3′ degradation at DSB ends. We further show that sgs1Δ mre11-H125N, but not sgs1Δ, is very sensitive to IR, implicating the Sgs1 helicase in the Dna2-mediated pathway.     

Orientation of the central domains of KSRP and its implications for the interaction with the RNA targets

KSRP is a multi-domain RNA-binding protein that recruits the exosome-containing mRNA degradation complex to mRNAs coding for cellular proliferation and inflammatory response factors. The selectivity of this mRNA degradation mechanism relies on KSRP recognition of AU-rich elements in the mRNA 3′UTR, that is mediated by KSRP’s KH domains. Our structural analysis shows that the inter-domain linker orients the two central KH domains of KSRP—and their RNA-binding surfaces—creating a two-domain unit. We also show that this inter-domain arrangement is important to the interaction with KSRP’s RNA targets.     

The ribonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase can interact with small regulatory RNAs in both protective and degradative modes

In all bacterial species examined thus far, small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) contribute to intricate patterns of dynamic genetic regulation. Many of the actions of these nucleic acids are mediated by well-characterized chaperones such as the Hfq protein, but genetic screens have also recently identified the 3′-to-5′ exoribonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) as an unexpected stabilizer and facilitator of sRNAs in vivo. To understand how a ribonuclease might mediate these effects, we tested the interactions of PNPase with sRNAs and found that the enzyme can readily degrade these nucleic acids in vitro but, nonetheless, copurifies from cell extracts with the same sRNAs without discernible degradation or modification to their 3′ ends, suggesting that the associated RNA is protected against the destructive activity of the ribonuclease. In vitro, PNPase, Hfq, and sRNA can form a ternary complex in which the ribonuclease plays a nondestructive, structural role. Such ternary complexes might be formed transiently in vivo, but could help to stabilize particular sRNAs and remodel their population on Hfq. Taken together, our results indicate that PNPase can be programmed to act on RNA in either destructive or stabilizing modes in vivo and may form complex, protective ribonucleoprotein assemblies that shape the landscape of sRNAs available for action.     

The KH and S1 domains of Escherichia coli polynucleotide phosphorylase are necessary for autoregulation and growth at low temperature

PNPase is a phosphate-dependent exonuclease of Escherichia coli required for growth in the cold. In this work we explored the effect of specific mutations in its two RNA binding domains KH and S1 on RNA binding, enzymatic activities, autoregulation and ability to grow at low temperature. We removed critical motifs that stabilize the hydrophobic core of each domain, as well as made a complete deletion of both (ΔKHS1) that severely impaired PNPase binding to RNA. Nevertheless, a residual RNA binding activity, possibly imputable to catalytic binding, could be observed even in the ΔKHS1 PNPase. These mutations also resulted in significant changes in the kinetic behavior of both phosphorolysis and polymerization activities of the enzyme, in particular for the double mutant Pnp-ΔKHS1-H. Additionally, PNPases with mutations in these RNA binding domains did not autoregulate efficiently and were unable to complement the growth defect of a chromosomal Δpnp mutation at 18 °C. Based on these results it appears that in E. coli the RNA binding domains of PNPase, in particular the KH domain, are vital at low temperature, when the stem-loop structures present in the target mRNAs are more stable and a machinery capable to degrade structured RNA may be essential.     

Studies of the 5' exonuclease and endonuclease activities of CPSF-73 in histone pre-mRNA processing

Processing of histone pre-mRNA requires a single 3′ endonucleolytic cleavage guided by the U7 snRNP that binds downstream of the cleavage site. Following cleavage, the downstream cleavage product (DCP) is rapidly degraded in vitro by a nuclease that also depends on the U7 snRNP. Our previous studies demonstrated that the endonucleolytic cleavage is catalyzed by the cleavage/polyadenylation factor CPSF-73. Here, by using RNA substrates with different nucleotide modifications, we characterize the activity that degrades the DCP. We show that the degradation is blocked by a 2′-O-methyl nucleotide and occurs in the 5′-to-3′ direction. The U7-dependent 5′ exonuclease activity is processive and continues degrading the DCP substrate even after complete removal of the U7-binding site. Thus, U7 snRNP is required only to initiate the degradation. UV cross-linking studies demonstrate that the DCP and its 5′-truncated version specifically interact with CPSF-73, strongly suggesting that in vitro, the same protein is responsible for the endonucleolytic cleavage of histone pre-mRNA and the subsequent degradation of the DCP. By using various RNA substrates, we define important space requirements upstream and downstream of the cleavage site that dictate whether CPSF-73 functions as an endonuclease or a 5′ exonuclease. RNA interference experiments with HeLa cells indicate that degradation of the DCP does not depend on the Xrn2 5′ exonuclease, suggesting that CPSF-73 degrades the DCP both in vitro and in vivo.     

Domain analysis of the chloroplast polynucleotide phosphorylase reveals discrete functions in RNA degradation,polyadenylation, and sequence homology with exosome proteins

The molecular mechanism of mRNA degradation in the chloroplast consists of sequential events, including endonucleolytic cleavage, the addition of poly(A)-rich sequences to the endonucleolytic cleavage products, and exonucleolytic degradation. In spinach chloroplasts, the latter two steps of polyadenylation and exonucleolytic degradation are performed by the same phosphorolytic and processive enzyme, polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). An analysis of its amino acid sequence shows that the protein is composed of two core domains related to RNase PH, two RNA binding domains (KH and S1), and an alpha-helical domain. The amino acid sequence and domain structure is largely conserved between bacteria and organelles. To define the molecular mechanism that controls the two opposite activities of this protein in the chloroplast, the ribonuclease, polymerase, and RNA binding properties of each domain were analyzed. The first core domain, which was predicted to be inactive in the bacterial enzymes, was active in RNA degradation but not in polymerization. Surprisingly, the second core domain was found to be active in degrading polyadenylated RNA only, suggesting that nonpolyadenylated molecules can be degraded only if tails are added, apparently by the same protein. The poly(A) high-binding-affinity site was localized to the S1 domain. The complete spinach chloroplast PNPase, as well as versions containing the core domains, complemented the cold sensitivity of an Escherichia coli PNPase-less mutant. Phylogenetic analyses of the two core domains showed that the two domains separated very early, resulting in the evolution of the bacterial and organelle PNPases and the exosome proteins found in eukaryotes and some archaea.     

Cleavage of poly(A) tails on the 3'-end of RNA by ribonuclease E of Escherichia coli

RNase E initiates the decay of Escherichia coli RNAs by cutting them internally near their 5′-end and is a component of the RNA degradosome complex, which also contains the 3′-exonuclease PNPase. Recently, RNase E has been shown to be able to remove poly(A) tails by what has been described as an exonucleolytic process that can be blocked by the presence of a phosphate group on the 3′-end of the RNA. We show here, however, that poly(A) tail removal by RNase E is in fact an endonucleolytic process that is regulated by the phosphorylation status at the 5′- but not the 3′-end of RNA. The rate of poly(A) tail removal by RNase E was found to be 30-fold greater when the 5′-terminus of RNA substrates was converted from a triphosphate to monophosphate group. This finding prompted us to re-analyse the contributions of the ribonucleolytic activities within the degradosome to 3′ attack since previous studies had only used substrates that had a triphosphate group on their 5′-end. Our results indicate that RNase E associated with the degradosome may contribute to the removal of poly(A) tails from 5′-monophosphorylated RNAs, but this is only likely to be significant should their attack by PNPase be blocked.