Heterochromatin: a meiotic matchmaker?

During meiosis, the pairing of chromosomes is crucial for a successful partitioning of the genetic material and its transmission into the developing gamete. The classical view of meiotic pairing involves recombination between homologues as an integral part of the pairing mechanism. But, in cases where no recombination occurs, how do chromosome partners find one another? And how do they pair up and then segregate appropriately? Recently, a combination of molecular genetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization appears to have provided an answer to these questions by demonstrating a crucial role for heterochromatin in chromosome pairing.     

How to characterize meiotic functions in plants?

Our understanding of plant meiosis is rapidly increasing thanks to the model Arabidopsis thaliana. Here we present the results of a screening for meiotic mutants carried out with a library containing 30,719 T-DNA insertion lines. An average of one mutant per 1000 lines was recovered. Several phenotypic classes could be distinguished and are presented. In parallel, 39 proteins known to be involved in meiosis in non-plant organisms were chosen and a search was performed for homologue sequences in the completed Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Approximately 30% of the meiotic related sequences showed similarities with one or several Arabidopsis putative genes. The relevance of forward versus reverse genetics in order to characterize meiotic functions is discussed.     

Mechanism of meiotic recombination in eukaryotes—A theory

It is proposed that in meiotic chromosomes single strand breaks of DNA originate either in the delayed regions of replicons or as a result of the excision activity of DNA polymerase during zygotene DNA synthesis. Rejoining of the break points belonging to non-sister chromatids takes place by switching over of the polymerase from one strand of DNA to another non-sister strand of the same polarity and gives rise to recombination intermediates (half-chromatid chiasmata). Strand migration in a recombination intermediate or copying of the same parental strand twice during zygotene as a consequence of a delay in copying the homologous strand would lead to gene conversion. Nicking of the cross strands (parental strands) in any recombination intermediate and subsequent repair leads to recombination for flanking markers. A possible way in which three-strand double crossovers occur and the process of recombination are discussed.     

DNA polymerase β is critical for mouse meiotic synapsis

We have shown earlier that DNA polymerase β (Pol β) localizes to the synaptonemal complex (SC) during Prophase I of meiosis in mice. Pol β localizes to synapsed axes during zygonema and pachynema, and it associates with the ends of bivalents during late pachynema and diplonema. To test whether these localization patterns reflect a function for Pol β in recombination and/or synapsis, we used conditional gene targeting to delete the PolB gene from germ cells. We find that Pol β-deficient spermatocytes are defective in meiotic chromosome synapsis and undergo apoptosis during Prophase I. We also find that SPO11-dependent γH2AX persists on meiotic chromatin, indicating that Pol β is critical for the repair of SPO11-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs). Pol β-deficient spermatocytes yielded reduced steady-state levels of the SPO11-oligonucleotide complexes that are formed when SPO11 is removed from the ends of DSBs, and cytological experiments revealed that chromosome-associated foci of replication protein A (RPA), RAD51 and DMC1 are less abundant in Pol β-deficient spermatocyte nuclei. Localization of Pol β to meiotic chromosomes requires the formation of SPO11-dependent DSBs. Taken together, these findings strongly indicate that Pol β is required at a very early step in the processing of meiotic DSBs, at or before the removal of SPO11 from DSB ends and the generation of the 3′ single-stranded tails necessary for subsequent strand exchange. The chromosome synapsis defects and Prophase I apoptosis of Pol β-deficient spermatocytes are likely a direct consequence of these recombination defects.     

PKCβ1 regulates meiotic cell cycle in mouse oocyte

PKCβI, a member of the classical protein kinase C family, plays key roles in regulating cell cycle transition. Here, we report the expression, localization and functions of PKCβI in mouse oocyte meiotic maturation. PKCβI and p-PKCβI (phosphor-PKCβI) were expressed from germinal vesicle (GV) stage to metaphase II (MII) stage. Confocal microscopy revealed that PKCβI was localized in the GV and evenly distributed in the cytoplasm after GV breakdown (GVBD), and it was concentrated at the midbody at telophase in meiotic oocytes. While, p-PKCβI was concentrated at the spindle poles at the metaphase stages and associated with midbody at telophase. Depletion of PKCβI by specific siRNA injection resulted in defective spindles, accompanied with spindle assembly checkpoint activation, metaphase I arrest and failure of first polar body (PB1) extrusion. Live cell imaging analysis also revealed that knockdown of PKCβI resulted in abnormal spindles, misaligned chromosomes, and meiotic arrest of oocytes arrest at the Pro-MI/MI stage. PKCβI depletion did not affect the G2/M transition, but its overexpression delayed the G2/M transition through regulating Cyclin B1 level and Cdc2 activity. Our findings reveal that PKCβI is a critical regulator of meiotic cell cycle progression in oocytes.

Abbreviations: PKC, protein kinase C; COC, cumulus-oocyte complexes; GV, germinal vesicle; GVBD, germinal vesicle breakdown; Pro-MI, first pro-metaphase; MI, first metaphase; Tel I, telophase I; MII, second metaphase; PB1, first polar body; SAC, spindle assembly checkpoint     

Does MAX open up a new avenue for meiotic research?

Meiosis is a central event of sexual reproduction. Like somatic cells, germ cells conduct mitosis to increase their cell number, but unlike somatic cells, germ cells switch their cell division mode from mitosis to meiosis at a certain point in gametogenesis. However, the molecular basis of this switch remains elusive. In this review article, we give an overview of the onset of mammalian meiosis, including our recent finding that MYC Associated Factor X (MAX) prevents ectopic and precocious meiosis in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and germ cells, respectively. We present a hypothetical model of a MAX‐centered molecular network that regulates meiotic entry in mammals and propose that inducible Max knockout ESCs provide an excellent platform for exploring the molecular mechanisms of meiosis initiation, while excluding other aspects of gametogenesis.     

How does Xenopus oocyte acquire its competence to undergo meiotic maturation?

During Xenopus oogenesis, the follicle-enclosed oocyte, arrested at the diplotene stage of meiotic prophase, accumulates pre-MPF. Pre-MPF is an heterodimer formed of cyclin B2 and Cdc2 protein kinase, which is maintained inactive by inhibitory phosphorylations on Thr14 and Tyr15. When the oocyte reaches its full size, it becomes competent to respond to progesterone and to activate MPF through a positive feedback loop. In this paper, we present experimental data indicating that the molecular network involved in the autoamplification loop of MPF is progressively established during late oogenesis.     

HP1γ links histone methylation marks to meiotic synapsis in mice

During meiosis, specific histone modifications at pericentric heterochromatin (PCH), especially histone H3 tri- and dimethylation at lysine 9 (H3K9me3 and H3K9me2, respectively), are required for proper chromosome interactions. However, the molecular mechanism by which H3K9 methylation mediates the synapsis is not yet understood. We have generated a Cbx3-deficient mouse line and performed comparative analysis on Suv39h1/h2-, G9a- and Cbx3-deficient spermatocytes. This study revealed that H3K9me2 at PCH depended on Suv39h1/h2-mediated H3K9me3 and its recognition by the Cbx3 gene product HP1γ. We further found that centromere clustering and synapsis were commonly affected in G9a- and Cbx3-deficient spermatocytes. These genetic observations suggest that HP1γ/G9a-dependent PCH-mediated centromere clustering is an axis for proper chromosome interactions during meiotic prophase. We propose that the role of the HP1γ/G9a axis is to retain centromeric regions of unpaired homologous chromosomes in close alignment and facilitate progression of their pairing in early meiotic prophase. This study also reveals considerable plasticity in the interplay between different histone modifications and suggests that such stepwise and dynamic epigenetic modifications may play a pivotal role in meiosis.     

Preparation and analysis of spermatocyte meiotic pachytene bivalents of pigs for gene mapping

Well-spread meiotic pachytene bivalents were obtained by using the prolonged hypotonic treatment com-bined with high chloroform Carnory’s fixative solution from cells of the testes of domestic pigs. Comparison in the division index and length of pachytene bivalents with metaphase chromosomes showed that those of the former are 5 times higher and 3.42(1.87-5.98) times longer than those of the latter. Comparative studies on chromomere maps of bivalents and mitotic chromosomal G-bands were conducted by using the chromo-some 12 as a example. Sex vesicle and various shapes of synaptic sex chromosomes have been observed.Two-color PRimed IN Situ (PRINS) labeling has been conducted successfully on pachytene bivalents of pigs.     

Giemsa C-banding of rye meiotic chromosomes and the nature of “terminal” chiasmata

The pattern of homologous chromosome association at metaphase I of meiosis in rye has been analysed and interpreted by means of the Giemsa C-banding procedure. The rationale for this approach stems from the unexpected coincidence of terminal Giemsa-bands in most chromosome arms and distal chiasma localisation which characterises this species. Analysis of banded metaphase I and anaphase I configurations suggests that meiotic exchanges occur proximal to the terminal Giemsa-bands, that is sub-terminally. The apparently terminal appearance of many chiasmata at metaphase I has been analysed by Giemsa-banding and shown to be more likely to result from bivalent distortion due to contraction and/or stretching (pseudoterminalisation) than from chiasma terminalisation in the accepted sense.     

How do meiotic chromosomes meet their homologous partners?: lessons from fission yeast

Homologous chromosome pairing is required for proper chromosome segregation and recombination during meiosis. The mechanism by which a pair of homologous chromosomes contact each other to establish pairing is not fully understood. When pairing occurs during meiotic prophase in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the nucleus oscillates between the cell poles and telomeres remain clustered at the leading edge of the moving nucleus. These meiosis-specific activities produce movements of telomere-bundled chromosomes. Several lines of evidence suggest that these movements facilitate homologous chromosome pairing by aligning homologous chromosomes and promoting contact between homologous regions. Since telomere clustering and nuclear or chromosome movements in meiotic prophase have been observed in a wide range of eukaryotic organisms, it is suggested that telomere-mediated chromosome movements are general activities that facilitate homologous chromosome pairing.     

To check or not to check? The application of meiotic studies to plant breeding

Understanding the barriers that prevent pairing and recombination of the chromosomes from two parental species is important for crop improvement strategies. It had been generally thought that plants do not possess checkpoint mechanisms during meiosis. However, recent data may question this assumption and suggest that exploitation of such mechanisms could be crucial to breeding.     

Mus81 cleavage of Holliday junctions: a failsafe for processing meiotic recombination intermediates?

The Holliday junction (HJ) is a central intermediate of homologous recombination. Its cleavage is critical for the formation of crossover recombinants during meiosis, which in turn helps to establish chiasmata and promote genetic diversity. Enzymes that cleave HJs, called HJ resolvases, have been identified in all domains of life except eukaryotic nuclei. Controversially, the Mus81-Eme1 endonuclease has been proposed to be an example of a eukaryotic nuclear resolvase. However, hitherto little or no HJ cleavage has been detected in recombinant preparations of Mus81-Eme1. Here, we report the purification of active forms of recombinant Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mus81-Eme1 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mus81-Mms4, which display robust HJ cleavage in vitro, which, in the case of Mus81-Eme1, is as good as the archetypal HJ resolvase RuvC in single turnover kinetic analysis. We also present genetic evidence that suggests that this activity might be utilised as a back-up to Mus81-Eme1's main activity of cleaving nicked HJs during meiosis in S. pombe.     

Are there morphologically abnormal early recombination nodules in the Drosophila melanogaster meiotic mutant mei-218?

Early recombination nodules have been suggested to perform a role in meiotic gene conversion recombination events. The meiotic recombination-defective mutant mei-218 greatly reduces the frequency of meiotic crossover (reciprocal) recombination events and reduces the number of late recombination nodules to the same extent. However, it does not reduce the frequency of simple gene conversion events, although they are abnormal in having shorter coconversion tracts than controls. The original cytological study yielded somewhat fewer early nodules in mei-218 than in controls, although very abnormal ones might have been missed. The present study failed to identify a mei-218 specific abnormal category. However, because recombination nodules are at present recognizable only by their morphology, a definitive answer to this question must await a specific probe for recombination nodules. Moreover, the possibility remains that early nodules in mei-218 are more ephemeral than are early nodules in wild type.     

The spatial regulation of meiotic recombination hotspots: Are all DSB hotspots crossover hotspots?

A key step for the success of meiosis is programmed homologous recombination, during which crossovers, or exchange of chromosome arms, take place. Crossovers increase genetic diversity but their main function is to ensure accurate chromosome segregation. Defects in crossover number and position produce aneuploidies that represent the main cause of miscarriages and chromosomal abnormalities such as Down's syndrome. Recombination is initiated by the formation of programmed double strand breaks (DSBs), which occur preferentially at places called DSB hotspots. Among all DSBs generated, only a small fraction is repaired by crossover, the other being repaired by other homologous recombination pathways. Crossover maps have been generated in a number of organisms, defining crossover hotspots. With the availability of genome-wide maps of DSBs as well as the ability to measure genetically the repair outcome at several hotspots, it is becoming more and more clear that not all DSB hotspots behave the same for crossover formation, suggesting that chromosomal features distinguish different types of hotspots.