Factors governing loss and rescue of DNA binding upon single and double mutations in the p53 core domain

The mutation of R273→H in the p53 core domain (p53-CD) is one of the most common mutations found in human cancers. Although the 273H p53-CD retains the wild-type conformation and stability, it lacks sequence-specific DNA binding, a transactivation function and growth suppression. However, mutating T284→R in the 273H p53-CD restores the DNA binding affinity, and transactivation and tumour suppressor functions. Since X-ray/NMR structures of DNA-free or DNA-bound mutant p53-CD molecules are unavailable, the factors governing the loss and rescue of sequence-specific DNA binding in the 273H and 273H+284R p53-CD, respectively, are unclear. Hence, we have carried out molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the wild-type, single mutant and double mutant p53-CD, free and DNA bound, in the presence of explicit water molecules. Based on the MD structures, the DNA-binding free energy of each p53 molecule has been computed and decomposed into component energies and contributions from the interface residues. The wild-type and mutant p53-CD MD structures were found to be consistent with the antibody-binding, X-ray and NMR data. The predicted DNA binding affinity and specificity of both mutant p53-CDs were also in accord with experimental data. The non-detectable DNA binding of the 273H p53-CD is due mainly to the disruption of a hydrogen-bonding network involving R273, D281 and R280, leading to a loss of major groove binding by R280 and K120. The restoration of DNA binding affinity and specificity of the 273H+284R p53-CD is due mainly to the introduction of another DNA-binding site at position 284, leading to a recovery of major groove binding by R280 and K120. The important role of water molecules and the DNA major groove conformation as well as implications for structure-based linker rescue of the 273H p53-CD DNA-binding affinity are discussed.     

Reactivation of mutant p53 through interaction of a C-terminal peptide with the core domain

A synthetic 22-mer peptide (peptide 46) derived from the p53 C-terminal domain can restore the growth suppressor function of mutant p53 proteins in human tumor cells (G. Selivanova et al., Nat. Med. 3:632-638, 1997). Here we demonstrate that peptide 46 binds mutant p53. Peptide 46 binding sites were found within both the core and C-terminal domains of p53. Lys residues within the peptide were critical for both p53 activation and core domain binding. The sequence-specific DNA binding of isolated tumor-derived mutant p53 core domains was restored by a C-terminal polypeptide. Our results indicate that C-terminal peptide binding to the core domain activates p53 through displacement of the negative regulatory C-terminal domain. Furthermore, stabilization of the core domain structure and/or establishment of novel DNA contacts may contribute to the reactivation of mutant p53. These findings should facilitate the design of p53-reactivating drugs for cancer therapy.     

Modeling multi-component protein-DNA complexes: the role of bending and dimerization in the complex of p53 dimers with DNA

We used molecular modeling to study the optimal conformation of the complex between two p53 DNA-binding domain monomers and a 12 base-pair target DNA sequence. The complex was constructed using experimental data on the monomer binding conformation and a new approach to deform the target DNA sequence. Combined with an internal/helicoidal coordinate model of DNA, this approach enables us to bend the target sequence in a controlled way while respecting the contacts formed with each p53 monomer. The results show that the dimeric complex favors DNA bending towards the major groove at the dimer junction by a value close to experimental findings. In contrast to inferences from earlier models, the calculation of key contributions to the free energy of the complexes indicates a determinant role for DNA in the formation of the complex with the dimer of the p53 DNA-binding domains.     

Analysis of p53 "latency" and "activation" by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Evidence for different modes of high affinity DNA binding

The concept that the tumor suppressor p53 is a latent DNA-binding protein that must become activated for sequence-specific DNA binding recently has been challenged, although the "activation" phenomenon has been well established in in vitro DNA binding assays. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, we analyzed the binding of "latent" and "activated" p53 to double-stranded DNA oligonucleotides containing or not containing a p53 consensus binding site (DNAspec or DNAunspec, respectively). In the absence of competitor DNA, latent p53 bound DNAspec and DNAunspec with high affinity in a sequence-independent manner. Activation of p53 by the addition of the C-terminal antibody PAb421 significantly decreased the binding affinity for DNAunspec and concomitantly increased the binding affinity for DNAspec. The net result of this dual effect is a significant difference in the affinity of activated p53 for DNAspec and DNAunspec, which explains the activation of p53. High affinity nonspecific DNA binding of latent p53 required both the p53 core domain and the p53 C terminus, whereas high affinity sequence-specific DNA binding of activated p53 was mediated by the p53 core domain alone. The data suggest that high affinity nonspecific DNA binding of latent and high affinity sequence-specific binding of activated p53 to double-stranded DNA differ in their requirement for the C terminus and involve different structural features of the core domain. Because high affinity nonspecific DNA binding of latent p53 is restricted to wild type p53, we propose that it relates to its tumor suppressor functions.     

Investigations of the supercoil-selective DNA binding of wild type p53 suggest a novel mechanism for controlling p53 function.

The tumor suppressor protein, p53, selectively binds to supercoiled (sc) DNA lacking the specific p53 consensus binding sequence (p53CON). Using p53 deletion mutants, we have previously shown that the p53 C-terminal DNA-binding site (CTDBS) is critical for this binding. Here we studied supercoil-selective binding of bacterially expressed full-length p53 using modulation of activity of the p53 DNA-binding domains by oxidation of cysteine residues (to preclude binding within the p53 core domain) and/or by antibodies mapping to epitopes at the protein C-terminus (to block binding within the CTDBS). In the absence of antibody, reduced p53 preferentially bound scDNA lacking p53CON in the presence of 3 kb linear plasmid DNAs or 20 mer oligonucleotides, both containing and lacking the p53CON. Blocking the CTDBS with antibody caused reduced p53 to bind equally to sc and linear or relaxed circular DNA lacking p53CON, but with a high preference for the p53CON. The same immune complex of oxidized p53 failed to bind DNA, while oxidized p53 in the absence of antibody restored selective scDNA binding. Antibodies mapping outside the CTDBS did not prevent p53 supercoil-selective (SCS) binding. These data indicate that the CTDBS is primarily responsible for p53 SCS binding. In the absence of the SCS binding, p53 binds sc or linear (relaxed) DNA via the p53 core domain and exhibits strong sequence-specific binding. Our results support a hypothesis that alterations to DNA topology may be a component of the complex cellular regulatory mechanisms that control the switch between latent and active p53 following cellular stress.     

Cooperative binding of tetrameric p53 to DNA

We analysed by analytical ultracentrifugation and fluorescence anisotropy the binding of p53 truncation mutants to sequence-specific DNA. The synthetic 30 base-pair DNA oligomers contained the 20 base-pair recognition elements for p53, consisting of four sites of five base-pairs per p53 monomer. We found that the binding at low ionic strengths was obscured by artifacts of non-specific binding and so made measurements at higher ionic strengths. Analytical ultracentrifugation of the construct p53CT (residues 94-360, containing the DNA-binding core and tetramerization domains) gave a dissociation constant of approximately 3 microM for its dimer-tetramer equilibrium, similar to that of full-length protein. Analytical ultracentrifugation and fluorescence anisotropy showed that p53CT formed a complex with the DNA constructs with 2:1 stoichiometry (dimer:DNA). The binding of p53CT (1-100 nm range) to DNA was highly cooperative, with a Hill coefficient of 1.8 (dimer:DNA). The dimeric L344A mutant of p53CT has impaired tetramerization. It bound to full-length DNA p53 recognition sequence, but with sixfold less affinity than wild-type protein. It did not form a detectable complex with a 30-mer DNA construct containing two specific five base-pair sites and two random sites, emphasizing the high co-operativity of the binding. The fundamental active unit of p53 appears to be the tetramer, which is induced by DNA binding, although it is a dimer at low concentrations.     

p53 binds to cisplatin-damaged DNA

We have previously shown that bacterially expressed p53 protein or p53 protein isolated from cis-diamminedichloroplatinum II (cisplatin)-damaged cells is capable of binding to double-stranded platinated DNA molecules lacking any p53 DNA binding sites. Here we report using various p53 mutants that two separate domains of p53 protein affect p53 binding to platinated DNA. Mutations within the central core of p53, the domain responsible for sequence-specific DNA binding activity, completely eliminated p53 binding to platinated DNA. Based on competition experiments p53 preferred binding to sequence-specific DNA molecules over platinated DNA molecules. However, p53 binding to platinated DNA molecules was significantly stronger than p53 interactions with DNA molecules lacking damage and a p53 consensus site. Finally, an antibody specific to the C-terminal domain of p53 (pAb421) which activates sequence-specific DNA binding activity inhibited p53 binding to platinated DNA. Taken together, these results suggest that in addition to binding to p53 DNA binding sites, p53 also interacts with cisplatin-damaged DNA molecules.     

The dihedral symmetry of the p53 tetramerization domain mandates a conformational switch upon DNA binding.

The p53 tumor suppressor forms stable tetramers, whose DNA binding activity is allosterically regulated. The tetramerization domain is contained within the C-terminus (residues 323-355) and its three-dimensional structure exhibits dihedral symmetry, such that a p53 tetramer can be considered a dimer of dimers. Under conditions where monomeric p53 fails to bind DNA, we studied the effects of p53 C-terminal mutations on DNA binding. Residues 322-355 were sufficient to drive DNA binding of p53 as a tetramer. Within this region residues predicted by the three-dimensional structure to stabilize tetramerization, such as Arg337 and Phe341, were critical for DNA binding. Furthermore, substitution of Leu344 caused p53 to dissociate into DNA binding-competent dimers, consistent with the location of this residue at the dimer-dimer interface. The p53 DNA site contains two inverted repeats juxtaposed to a second pair of inverted repeats. Thus, the four repeats exhibit cyclic-translation symmetry and cannot be recognized simultaneously by four dihedrally symmetric p53 DNA binding domains. The discrepancy may be resolved by flexible linkers between the p53 DNA binding and tetramerization domains. When these linkers were deleted p53 exhibited novel DNA binding properties consistent with an inability to recognize four contiguous DNA repeats. Allosteric regulation of p53 DNA binding may involve repositioning the DNA binding domains from a dihedrally symmetric state to a DNA-bound asymmetric state.     

Structural basis of DNA recognition by p53 tetramers

The tumor-suppressor protein p53 is among the most effective of the cell's natural defenses against cancer. In response to cellular stress, p53 binds as a tetramer to diverse DNA targets containing two decameric half-sites, thereby activating the expression of genes involved in cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis. Here we present high-resolution crystal structures of sequence-specific complexes between the core domain of human p53 and different DNA half-sites. In all structures, four p53 molecules self-assemble on two DNA half-sites to form a tetramer that is a dimer of dimers, stabilized by protein-protein and base-stacking interactions. The protein-DNA interface varies as a function of the specific base sequence in correlation with the measured binding affinities of the complexes. The new data establish a structural framework for understanding the mechanisms of specificity, affinity, and cooperativity of DNA binding by p53 and suggest a model for its regulation by regions outside the sequence-specific DNA binding domain.     

Transformation by v-myb correlates with trans-activation of gene expression.

The v-myb oncogene of avian myeloblastosis virus causes acute myelomonocytic leukemia in chickens and transforms avian myeloid cells in vitro. Its protein product p48v-myb is a nuclear, sequence-specific, DNA-binding protein which activates gene expression in transient DNA transfection studies. To investigate the relationship between transformation and trans-activation by v-myb, we constructed 15 in-frame linker insertion mutants. The 12 mutants which transformed myeloid cells also trans-activated gene expression, whereas the 3 mutants which did not transform also did not trans-activate. This implies that trans-activation is required for transformation by v-myb. One of the transformation-defective mutants localized to the cell nucleus but failed to bind DNA. The other two transformation-defective mutants localized to the cell nucleus and bound DNA but nevertheless failed to trans-activate. These latter mutants define two distinct domains of p48v-myb which control trans-activation by DNA-bound protein, one within the amino-terminal DNA-binding domain itself and one in a carboxyl-terminal domain which is not required for DNA binding.     

NMR structure of the hRap1 Myb motif reveals a canonical three-helix bundle lacking the positive surface charge typical of Myb DNA-binding domains.

Mammalian telomeres are composed of long tandem arrays of double-stranded telomeric TTAGGG repeats associated with the telomeric DNA-binding proteins, TRF1 and TRF2. TRF1 and TRF2 contain a similar C-terminal Myb domain that mediates sequence-specific binding to telomeric DNA. In the budding yeast, telomeric DNA is associated with scRap1p, which has a central DNA-binding domain that contains two structurally related Myb domains connected by a long linker, an N-terminal BRCT domain, and a C-terminal RCT domain. Recently, the human ortholog of scRap1p (hRap1) was identified and shown to contain a BRCT domain and an RCT domain similar to scRap1p. However, hRap1 contained only one recognizable Myb motif in the center of the protein. Furthermore, while scRap1p binds telomeric DNA directly, hRap1 has no DNA-binding ability. Instead, hRap1 is tethered to telomeres by TRF2. Here, we have determined the solution structure of the Myb domain of hRap1 by NMR. It contains three helices maintained by a hydrophobic core. The architecture of the hRap1 Myb domain is very close to that of each of the Myb domains from TRF1, scRap1p and c-Myb. However, the electrostatic potential surface of the hRap1 Myb domain is distinguished from that of the other Myb domains. Each of the minimal DNA-binding domains, containing one Myb domain in TRF1 and two Myb domains in scRap1p and c-Myb, exhibits a positively charged broad surface that contacts closely the negatively charged backbone of DNA. By contrast, the hRap1 Myb domain shows no distinct positive surface, explaining its lack of DNA-binding activity. The hRap1 Myb domain may be a member of a second class of Myb motifs that lacks DNA-binding activity but may interact instead with other proteins. Other possible members of this class are the c-Myb R1 Myb domain and the Myb domains of ADA2 and Adf1. Thus, while the folds of all Myb domains resemble each other closely, the function of each Myb domain depends on the amino acid residues that are located on the surface of each protein.     

Reciprocal interference between the sequence-specific core and nonspecific C-terminal DNA binding domains of p53: implications for regulation.

The tumor suppressor p53 has two DNA binding domains: a central sequence-specific domain and a C-terminal sequence-independent domain. Here, we show that binding of large but not small DNAs by the C terminus of p53 negatively regulates sequence-specific DNA binding by the central domain. Four previously described mechanisms for activation of specific DNA binding operate by blocking negative regulation. Deletion of the C terminus of p53 activates specific DNA binding only in the presence of large DNA. Three activator molecules (a small nucleic acid, a monoclonal antibody against the p53 C terminus, and a C-terminal peptide of p53) stimulate sequence-specific DNA binding only in the presence of both large DNA and p53 with an intact C terminus. Our findings argue that interactions of the C terminus of p53 with genomic DNA in vivo would prevent p53 binding to specific promoters and that cellular mechanisms to block C-terminal DNA binding would be required.     

Mechanism of DNA-binding loss upon single-point mutation in p53

Over 50% of all human cancers involve p53 mutations, which occur mostly in the sequence-specific DNA-binding central domain (p53c), yielding little/non-detectable affinity to the DNA consensus site. Despite our current understanding of protein-DNA recognition, the mechanism(s) underlying the loss in protein-DNA binding affinity/specificity upon single-point mutation are not well understood. Our goal is to identify the common factors governing the DNA-binding loss of p53c upon substitution of Arg 273 to His or Cys, which are abundant in human tumours. By computing the free energies of wild-type and mutant p53c binding to DNA and decomposing them into contributions from individual residues, the DNA-binding loss upon charge/noncharge-conserving mutation of Arg 273 was attributed not only to the loss of DNA phosphate contacts, but also to longer-range structural changes caused by the loss of the Asp 281 salt-bridge. The results herein and in previous works suggest that Asp 281 plays a critical role in the sequence-specific DNA-binding function of p53c by (i) orienting Arg 273 and Arg 280 in an optimal position to interact with the phosphate and base groups of the consensus DNA, respectively, and (ii) helping to maintain the proper DNA-binding protein conformation.