Ii Chain Controls the Transport of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Molecules to and from Lysosomes

Major histocompatibility complex class II molecules are synthesized as a nonameric complex consisting of three αβ dimers associated with a trimer of invariant (Ii) chains. After exiting the TGN, a targeting signal in the Ii chain cytoplasmic domain directs the complex to endosomes where Ii chain is proteolytically processed and removed, allowing class II molecules to bind antigenic peptides before reaching the cell surface. Ii chain dissociation and peptide binding are thought to occur in one or more postendosomal sites related either to endosomes (designated CIIV) or to lysosomes (designated MIIC). We now find that in addition to initially targeting αβ dimers to endosomes, Ii chain regulates the subsequent transport of class II molecules. Under normal conditions, murine A20 B cells transport all of their newly synthesized class II I-A^b αβ dimers to the plasma membrane with little if any reaching lysosomal compartments. Inhibition of Ii processing by the cysteine/serine protease inhibitor leupeptin, however, blocked transport to the cell surface and caused a dramatic but selective accumulation of I-A^b class II molecules in lysosomes. In leupeptin, I-A^b dimers formed stable complexes with a 10-kD NH₂-terminal Ii chain fragment (Ii-p10), normally a transient intermediate in Ii chain processing. Upon removal of leupeptin, Ii-p10 was degraded and released, I-A^b dimers bound antigenic peptides, and the peptide-loaded dimers were transported slowly from lysosomes to the plasma membrane. Our results suggest that alterations in the rate or efficiency of Ii chain processing can alter the postendosomal sorting of class II molecules, resulting in the increased accumulation of αβ dimers in lysosome-like MIIC. Thus, simple differences in Ii chain processing may account for the highly variable amounts of class II found in lysosomal compartments of different cell types or at different developmental stages.The initiation of most immune responses requires antigen recognition by helper T lymphocytes. The antigen receptors on T cells can only recognize antigens as small peptides bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC)¹ class II molecules at the surface of antigen presenting cells (Cresswell, 1994; Germain, 1994). The complexes between class II molecules and antigenic peptides are formed intracellularly somewhere along the endocytic pathway (Germain, 1994; Wolf and Ploegh, 1995). This process requires the internalization of protein antigen and its delivery to a site suitable for the generation of antigenic peptides. In addition, the peptides must be generated within, or transferred to, a site to which newly synthesized MHC class II molecules are delivered and rendered competent for peptide binding (Davidson et al., 1991).Invariant (Ii) chain plays a central role in controlling the intracellular transport of MHC class II (Cresswell, 1996). In the ER, Ii chain is synthesized as a trimer that complexes with three αβ dimers of MHC class II (Roche et al., 1991). Its NH₂-terminal cytoplasmic domain contains a wellknown targeting signal that directs class II–Ii chain complexes to endosomes after exit from the TGN (Bakke and Dobberstein, 1990; Lotteau et al., 1990; Neefjes et al., 1990; Odorizzi et al., 1994; Pieters et al., 1993). Once in endosomes, Ii chain is subjected to proteolysis by acid hydrolases (Roche and Cresswell, 1991). Degradation occurs in a stepwise fashion, resulting in the appearance of class II– bound NH₂-terminal intermediates containing the Ii chain cytoplasmic domain, membrane anchor, and parts of its luminal domain (Newcomb and Cresswell, 1993). The intermediates accumulate in the presence of protease inhibitors that interfere with Ii chain processing such as the serinecysteine protease inhibitor leupeptin, treatment with which can also block the transport of at least some class II haplotypes to the cell surface (Amigorena et al., 1995; Blum and Cresswell, 1988; Neefjes and Ploegh, 1992). How leupeptin inhibits surface appearance is unknown.In human cells, Ii chain degradation intermediates include a 21–22-kD fragment (designated LIP [leupeptininducible peptide]) and a 10–12-kD fragment (designated SLIP [small leupeptin-inducible peptide]) (Blum and Cresswell, 1988; Maric et al., 1994). In murine cells, only a 10– 12-kD fragment has been identified (Ii-p10) (Amigorena et al., 1995). Ii-p10 remains as a trimer associated with three αβ dimers and blocks the binding of antigenic peptides (Amigorena et al., 1995; Morton et al., 1995). It is thus likely that Ii-p10 includes a luminal region of Ii chain (designated CLIP) known to occupy the peptide binding groove of αβ dimers. Cleavage of Ii-p10 by a leupeptinsensitive protease causes its dissociation from αβ dimers, while leaving CLIP in the peptide binding groove. The removal of CLIP is favored at acidic pH but is additionally catalyzed by a second MHC gene product, HLA-DM (Sloan et al., 1995; Denzin and Cresswell, 1995; Karlsson et al., 1994; Roche, 1995). In mutant cells lacking HLA-DM, there is defective loading of antigenic peptides and the appearance of CLIP-αβ dimers on the plasma membrane (Mellins et al., 1994; Riberdy et al., 1992).The precise site(s) where these events occur remains unclear. In A20 B cells, a specialized population of endosome-like vesicles designated CIIV (for class II vesicles) represents a site through which a majority of newly synthesized class II molecules pass en route to the cell surface and a place where antigenic peptides bind αβ dimers of the I-A^d haplotype (Amigorena et al., 1994, 1995; Barnes and Mitchell, 1995). CIIV are physically distinct from the bulk of endosomes and lysosomes and contain at least some HLA-DM (Pierre et al., 1996). Despite the fact that most of the αβ dimers reaching CIIV are newly synthesized, CIIV contain little or no intact Ii chain (Amigorena et al., 1995). Thus, Ii chain–αβ complexes first may be delivered to endosomes where Ii chain is cleaved before being delivered to CIIV. That peptide loading can occur in CIIV has been demonstrated by experiments showing that leupeptin causes CIIV to transiently accumulate Ii-p10– containing complexes, which can then bind peptide (Amigorena et al., 1995).In human Epstein-Barr virus–transformed B lymphoblasts, most class II molecules have been localized to structures collectively designated MIIC (for MHC class II compartment) (Peters et al., 1991; Tulp et al., 1994; West et al., 1994). MIICs differ from CIIVs in that the latter contain endosomal but not lysosomal markers, while MIICs have most or all of the features of lysosomes (Peters et al., 1991, 1995; Pierre et al., 1996). Interestingly, the distribution of class II between endosomal (CIIV) and lysosomal (MIIC) compartments varies widely among cell types. Since lysosomes are classically defined as terminal degradative organelles (Kornfeld and Mellman, 1989), such variations may reflect differences in the rates at which class II is turned over in different cell types. On the other hand, MIICs also contain the bulk of HLA-DM and can host the loading of antigenic peptides onto class II molecules (Sanderson et al., 1994). The extent to which these complexes escape degradation and reach the cell surface is unclear. Nor is it at all clear how different cell types regulate the intracellular distribution of class II molecules between early and late endocytic compartments.We now show that murine A20 cells expressing endogenous I-A^d and transfected I-A^b normally localize little class II in lysosomes. Selective lysosomal accumulation of I-A^b αβ dimers can be induced after leupeptin treatment. Interestingly, I-A^b dimers, but not I-A^d dimers, are induced by leupeptin to form stable complexes with Ii-p10. Upon removal of the inhibitor, the Ii-p10 was removed and class II molecules were slowly transported from lysosomes to the cell surface. Thus, the rate of dissociation of Ii chain intermediates can regulate whether newly synthesized class II molecules are transported to the plasma membrane or to lysosomes.     

The Deubiquitinating Enzyme USP10 Regulates the Post-endocytic Sorting of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator in Airway Epithelial Cells

The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), a member of the ABC transporter superfamily, is a cyclic AMP-regulated chloride channel and a regulator of other ion channels and transporters. In epithelial cells CFTR is rapidly endocytosed from the apical plasma membrane and efficiently recycles back to the plasma membrane. Because ubiquitination targets endocytosed CFTR for degradation in the lysosome, deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) are likely to facilitate CFTR recycling. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to identify DUBs that regulate the post-endocytic sorting of CFTR. Using an activity-based chemical screen to identify active DUBs in human airway epithelial cells, we demonstrated that Ubiquitin Specific Protease-10 (USP10) is located in early endosomes and regulates the deubiquitination of CFTR and its trafficking in the post-endocytic compartment. small interference RNA-mediated knockdown of USP10 increased the amount of ubiquitinated CFTR and its degradation in lysosomes, and reduced both apical membrane CFTR and CFTR-mediated chloride secretion. Moreover, a dominant negative USP10 (USP10-C424A) increased the amount of ubiquitinated CFTR and its degradation, whereas overexpression of wt-USP10 decreased the amount of ubiquitinated CFTR and increased the abundance of CFTR. These studies demonstrate a novel function for USP10 in facilitating the deubiquitination of CFTR in early endosomes and thereby enhancing the endocytic recycling of CFTR.The endocytosis, endocytic recycling, and endosomal sorting of numerous transport proteins and receptors are regulated by ubiquitination (1–6). Ubiquitin, an 8-kDa protein, is conjugated to target proteins via a series of steps that includes ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1),² ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2), and ubiquitin ligases (E3) (1). Proteins that are ubiquitinated in the plasma membrane are internalized and are either deubiquitinated and recycle back to the plasma membrane or, via interactions with the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport machinery, are delivered to the lysosome for degradation (1–7). Sorting of ubiquitinated plasma membrane proteins for either the lysosomal pathway or for the recycling pathway is regulated, in part, by the removal of ubiquitin by deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) (1–6). Thus, the balance between ubiquitination and deubiquitination regulates the plasma membrane abundance of several membrane proteins, including the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC), the epidermal growth factor receptor, the transforming growth factor-β receptor, and the cytokine receptor γ-c (8–14).CFTR is rapidly endocytosed from the plasma membrane and undergoes rapid and efficient recycling back to the plasma membrane in human airway epithelial cells, with >75% of endocytosed wild-type CFTR recycling back to the plasma membrane (15–18). A study published several years ago demonstrated that, although ubiquitination did not regulate CFTR endocytosis, ubiquitination reduced the plasma membrane abundance of CFTR in BHK cells by redirecting CFTR from recycling endosomes to lysosomes for degradation (19). However, neither the E3 ubiquitin ligase(s) responsible for the ubiquitination of CFTR nor the DUB(s) responsible for the deubiquitination of CFTR in the endocytic pathway have been identified in any cell type. Moreover, the effect of the ubiquitin status of CFTR on its endocytic sorting in human airway epithelial cells has not been reported. Thus, the goals of this study were to determine if the ubiquitin status regulates the post-endocytic sorting of CFTR in polarized airway epithelial cells, and to identify the DUBs that deubiquitinate CFTR.Approximately 100 DUBs have been identified in the human genome and are classified into five families based on sequence similarity and mechanism of action (1–6, 20, 21). To identify DUBs that regulate the deubiquitination of CFTR from this large class of enzymes, we chose an activity-based, chemical probe screening approach developed by Dr. Hidde Ploegh (4, 21, 22). This approach utilizes a hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged ubiquitin probe engineered with a C-terminal modification incorporating a thiol-reactive group that forms an irreversible, covalent bond with active DUBs. Using this approach we demonstrated in polarized human airway epithelial cells that ubiquitin-specific protease-10 (USP10) is located in early endosomes and regulates the deubiquitination of CFTR and thus its trafficking in the post-endocytic compartment. These studies demonstrate a novel function for USP10 in promoting the deubiquitination of CFTR in early endosomes and thereby enhancing the endocytic recycling of CFTR.     

Identification of Regulatory and Cargo Proteins of Endosomal and Secretory Pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana by Proteomic Dissection

The cell''s endomembranes comprise an intricate, highly dynamic and well-organized system. In plants, the proteins that regulate function of the various endomembrane compartments and their cargo remain largely unknown. Our aim was to dissect subcellular trafficking routes by enriching for partially overlapping subpopulations of endosomal proteomes associated with endomembrane markers. We selected RABD2a/ARA5, RABF2b/ARA7, RABF1/ARA6, and RABG3f as markers for combinations of the Golgi, trans-Golgi network (TGN), early endosomes (EE), secretory vesicles, late endosomes (LE), multivesicular bodies (MVB), and the tonoplast. As comparisons we used Golgi transport 1 (GOT1), which localizes to the Golgi, clathrin light chain 2 (CLC2) labeling clathrin-coated vesicles and pits and the vesicle-associated membrane protein 711 (VAMP711) present at the tonoplast. We developed an easy-to-use method by refining published protocols based on affinity purification of fluorescent fusion constructs to these seven subcellular marker proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. We present a total of 433 proteins, only five of which were shared among all enrichments, while many proteins were common between endomembrane compartments of the same trafficking route. Approximately half, 251 proteins, were assigned to one enrichment only. Our dataset contains known regulators of endosome functions including small GTPases, SNAREs, and tethering complexes. We identify known cargo proteins such as PIN3, PEN3, CESA, and the recently defined TPLATE complex. The subcellular localization of two GTPase regulators predicted from our enrichments was validated using live-cell imaging. This is the first proteomic dataset to discriminate between such highly overlapping endomembrane compartments in plants and can be used as a general proteomic resource to predict the localization of proteins and identify the components of regulatory complexes and provides a useful tool for the identification of new protein markers of the endomembrane system.Membrane compartmentalization is an essential mechanism for eukaryotic life, by which cells separate and control biological processes. Plant growth, development, and adaptation to biotic and abiotic stress all rely on the highly dynamic endomembrane system, yet we know comparatively little about the proteins regulating these dynamic trafficking events. The plasma membrane (PM) provides the main interface between the cell and its environment, mediating the transfer of material to and from the cell and is a primary site for perception of external signals. Transmembrane proteins are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and trafficked to the PM via the Golgi, although there are other secretory routes for soluble cargo (discussed in (1–4)). Post-Golgi trafficking is the main route by which newly synthesized transmembrane proteins and cell wall glycans are delivered to the PM. In plants, secretory and endocytic traffic converge at the trans-Golgi network (TGN), which also functions as an early endosome (EE). Multivesicular bodies (MVBs) are the other main endosomal compartment in plants and serve as prevacuolar compartments (PVCs) or late endosomes (LE) destined for vacuolar degradation (reviewed (1, 5, 6)).Recycling and sorting of plasma membrane proteins is essential for generating the polar localization of auxin efflux transporters (discussed in (7)), formation of the cell plate during cell division (8–11), and in defense such as localized deposition of papilla reviewed in (12, 13). Furthermore, the subcellular localization of transporters and receptors is dynamically regulated. For example, the boron transporter (BOR1) exhibits polar localization and is internalized and degraded under conditions of high boron to reduce toxicity (14, 15). Similarly the receptor-like kinases (RLKs) flagellin-sensing 2 (FLS2) and brassinosteroid insensitive 1 (BRI1), important transmembrane receptors in antibacterial immunity and plant development, respectively, are constitutively endocytosed and recycled to the PM (16–18). Both receptors and transporters are also cargoes of the LE/MVB trafficking route (16) and are probably sorted to the vacuole for degradation (19, 20). Importantly, FLS2 trafficking via the recycling endocytic or the late endocytic route depends on its activation status; inactive receptors are recycled while ligand-activated receptors are sorted to the late endosomal pathway (16). Similarly, the polar sorting of auxin efflux transporters depends on their phosphorylation status (21). These observations illustrate that membrane compartmentalization underpins important aspects of plant cell biology and has initiated a quest toward a better understanding of the endomembrane compartments and the routes and mechanisms by which cargo is trafficked and sorted within the cell.Membrane trafficking within the cell requires complex machinery consisting of a plethora of coat and adaptor proteins, small GTPases, targeting, tethering, and scission factors (reviewed in (22, 23)). Homologues of some animal and yeast and endomembrane regulators have been identified in plants, but the localization and function of many of these remain to be characterized. For example, members of the RAB GTPase family have been shown to have markedly different roles and localizations in plants compared with their animal and yeast homologs (24). Therefore, acquiring localization data for tethering complexes and other regulators in plant systems is essential. In Arabidopsis thaliana, some of these proteins have been developed as useful probes to visualize the different endomembrane compartments by fusion with fluorescent reporters (9, 25–27). These include regulators of trafficking events such as RAB GTPases that are molecular switches responsible for the assembly of tethering and docking complexes and compartment identity. RAB proteins are widely used markers of endomembrane compartments, for example RABD2a/ARA5 labels the Golgi and TGN/EE as well as post-Golgi vesicles (4, 24, 26, 28), RABF2b/ARA7 localizes to TGN/EE and LE (25), RABF1/ARA6 is a marker of the LE/MVB vesicles (25, 29), and RABG3f localizes to MVBs and the tonoplast (26, 30).Fluorescent-tagged marker lines for the live-cell imaging of plant cells have been invaluable in defining the location of proteins within and between organelles and endomembrane compartments (26). However, microscopic investigation of membrane trafficking is limited by throughput, as only few proteins can be studied simultaneously. A powerful approach to large-scale identification of proteins in endomembrane compartments is through subcellular fractionation based on physical properties to directly isolate or enrich for the subcellular compartment of interest. Subcellular fractionation-based proteomics have been successfully used to decipher the steady state and cargo proteomes of, including but not limited to, the ER, the vacuole, PM, mitochondria and chloroplasts, and smaller vesicle-like compartments such as peroxisomes and Golgi (31–41). However, the smaller, transitory vesicles of the secretory and endocytic pathways have proved challenging to purify for reliable proteomic analysis. To overcome this, affinity purification of vesicles was established in animal cells (42, 43) and recently successfully applied in plants in combination with subcellular fractionation. Affinity purification and mass spectrometry (MS) of syntaxin of plants 61 (SYP61)-positive TGN/EE compartments identified 145 proteins specifically enriched in (44), while affinity isolation of VHA-a1-GFP (vacuolar H⁺ ATPase A1) identified 105 proteins associated with the TGN/EE (45). The VHA-A1 affinity purification data were then further refined using density gradient centrifugation to differentiate cargo and steady-state proteins (45).We have further explored affinity purification of fluorescent-tagged markers localizing to defined compartments to identify proteins associated with trafficking. Our motivation was to dissect the trafficking routes by enriching for partially overlapping subpopulations of endosomal proteomes associated with small GTPases in the RAB family. We selected RABD2a/ARA5, RABF2b/ARA7, RABF1/ARA6, and RABG3f as markers for Golgi/TGN/EE/secretory vesicles, LE/MVB compartments, LE/MVB compartments and LE/MVB/tonoplast, respectively. Additionally, we used Golgi transport 1 (GOT1), which localizes to the Golgi, clathrin light chain 2 (CLC2) labeling clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) and pits and the vesicle-associated membrane protein 711 (VAMP711) present at the tonoplast (26, 27, 29, 46, 47) as comparisons. Our objective was to identify transient cargo proteins, tethers, and docking factors associated with dynamic subdomains of the endomembrane system, to supplement better-characterized “steady-state” components, and to identify components of recycling and vacuolar trafficking pathways.     

Ubiquitination Regulates Proteolytic Processing of G Protein-coupled Receptors after Their Sorting to Lysosomes

Ubiquitination is essential for the endocytic sorting of various G protein-coupled receptors to lysosomes. Here we identify a distinct function of this covalent modification in controlling the later proteolytic processing of receptors. Mutation of all cytoplasmic lysine residues in the murine δ-opioid receptor blocked receptor ubiquitination without preventing ligand-induced endocytosis of receptors or their subsequent delivery to lysosomes, as verified by proteolysis of extramembrane epitope tags and down-regulation of radioligand binding to the transmembrane helices. Surprisingly, a functional screen revealed that the E3 ubiquitin ligase AIP4 specifically controls down-regulation of wild type receptors measured by radioligand binding without detectably affecting receptor delivery to lysosomes defined both immunochemically and biochemically. This specific AIP4-dependent regulation required direct ubiquitination of receptors and was also regulated by two deubiquitinating enzymes, AMSH and UBPY, which localized to late endosome/lysosome membranes containing internalized δ-opioid receptor. These results identify a distinct function of AIP4-dependent ubiquitination in controlling the later proteolytic processing of G protein-coupled receptors, without detectably affecting their endocytic sorting to lysosomes. We propose that ubiquitination or ubiquitination/deubiquitination cycling specifically regulates later proteolytic processing events required for destruction of the receptor''s hydrophobic core.A fundamental cellular mechanism contributing to homeostatic regulation of receptor-mediated signal transduction involves ligand-induced endocytosis of receptors followed by proteolysis in lysosomes. The importance of such proteolytic down-regulation has been documented extensively for a number of seven-transmembrane or G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs),³ which comprise the largest known family of signaling receptors expressed in animals, as well as for other important signaling receptors, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (1–5).One GPCR that is well known to undergo endocytic trafficking to lysosomes is the δ-opioid peptide receptor (DOR or DOP-R) (6). Following endocytosis, DOR traffics efficiently to lysosomes in both neural and heterologous cell models (6–8), whereas many membrane proteins, including various GPCRs, recycle rapidly to the plasma membrane (9–12). Such molecular sorting of internalized receptors between divergent recycling and degradative pathways is thought to play a fundamental role in determining the functional consequences of regulated endocytosis (2, 3, 13, 14). The sorting process that directs internalized DOR to lysosomes is remarkably efficient and appears to occur rapidly (within several min) after receptor endocytosis (11). Nevertheless, biochemical mechanisms that control lysosomal trafficking and proteolysis of DOR remain poorly understood.A conserved mechanism that promotes lysosomal trafficking of a number of membrane proteins, including various signaling receptors, is mediated by covalent modification of cytoplasmic lysine residues with ubiquitin (4, 15–17). Ubiquitination was first identified as an endocytic sorting determinant in studies of vacuolar trafficking of the yeast GPCR Ste2p (18). Subsequent studies have established numerous examples of lysyl-ubiquitination being required for sorting endocytic cargo to lysosomes and have identified conserved machinery responsible for the targeting of ubiquitinated cargo to lysosomes (3, 17, 19–22).The CXCR4 chemokine receptor provides a clear example of ubiquitin-dependent lysosomal sorting of a mammalian GPCR. Ubiquitination of the carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the CXCR4 receptor, mediated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase AIP4, is specifically required for the HRS- and VPS4-dependent trafficking of internalized receptors to lysosomes. Blocking this ubiquitination event by Lys → Arg mutation of the receptor specifically inhibits trafficking of internalized receptors to lysosomes, resulting in recycling rather than lysosomal proteolysis of receptors after ligand-induced endocytosis (23–25).Lysosomal trafficking of DOR, in contrast, is not prevented by mutation of cytoplasmic lysine residues (26) and can be regulated by ubiquitination-independent protein interaction(s) (27, 28). Nevertheless, both wild type and lysyl-mutant DORs traffic to lysosomes via a similar pathway as ubiquitin-dependent membrane cargo and require both HRS and active VPS4 to do so (29). These observations indicate that DOR engages the same core endocytic mechanism utilized by ubiquitination-directed membrane cargo but leave unresolved whether ubiquitination of DOR plays any role in this important cellular mechanism of receptor down-regulation.There is no doubt that DOR can undergo significant ubiquitination in mammalian cells, including HEK293 cells (30–32), where lysosomal trafficking of lysyl-mutant receptors was first observed (26). Ubiquitination was shown previously to promote proteolysis of DOR by proteasomes and to function in degrading misfolded receptors from the biosynthetic pathway (30, 31). A specific role of ubiquitination in promoting proteasome- but not lysosome-mediated proteolysis of DOR has been emphasized (32) and proposed to contribute to proteolytic down-regulation of receptors also from the plasma membrane (33).To our knowledge, no previous studies have determined if DOR ubiquitination plays any role in controlling receptor proteolysis mediated by lysosomes, although this represents a predominant pathway by which receptors undergo rapid down-regulation following ligand-induced endocytosis in a number of cell types, including HEK293 cells (8). In the present study, we have taken two approaches to addressing this fundamental question. First, we have investigated in greater detail the effects of lysyl-mutation on DOR ubiquitination and trafficking. Second, we have independently investigated the role of ubiquitination in controlling lysosomal proteolysis of wild type DOR. Our results clearly establish the ability of DOR to traffic efficiently to lysosomes in the absence of any detectable ubiquitination. Further, they identify a distinct and unanticipated function of AIP4-dependent ubiquitination in regulating the later proteolytic processing of receptors and show that this distinct ubiquitin-dependent regulatory mechanism operates effectively downstream of the sorting decision that commits internalized receptors for delivery to lysosomes.     

Mtv-1 Superantigen Trafficks Independently of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Directly to the B-Cell Surface by the Exocytic Pathway

Presentation of the Mtv-1 superantigen (vSag1) to specific V_β-bearing T cells requires association with major histocompatibility complex class II molecules. The intracellular route by which vSag1 trafficks to the cell surface and the site of vSag1-class II complex assembly in antigen-presenting B lymphocytes have not been determined. Here, we show that vSag1 trafficks independently of class II to the plasma membrane by the exocytic secretory pathway. At the surface of B cells, vSag1 associates primarily with mature peptide-bound class II αβ dimers, which are stable in sodium dodecyl sulfate. vSag1 is unstable on the cell surface in the absence of class II, and reagents that alter the surface expression of vSag1 and the conformation of class II molecules affect vSag1 stimulation of superantigen reactive T cells.

T lymphocytes respond to peptide antigens presented by either major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I or class II molecules. Many viruses have evolved sophisticated strategies that interfere with antigen presentation by infected cells in order to escape recognition by T lymphocytes. Most strategies studied rely on disrupting MHC class I presentation, either by affecting components of the processing machinery that generate and transport viral peptides into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or by retarding transport or targeting class I molecules into the degradation pathway (for a review, see reference 73).In contrast, mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) utilizes T-cell stimulation to promote its life cycle. MMTVs encode within their 3′ long terminal repeat a viral superantigen (vSag), and coexpression of the Sag glycoprotein with MHC class II molecules on the surface of virally infected B cells induces V_β-specific T-cell stimulation, generating an immune response which is critical for amplification of MMTV and ensures vertical transmission of virus to the next generation (13, 29, 30). In the absence of B cells, MHC class II, or Sag-reactive T cells, the infection is short-lived (5, 6, 24, 28). The assembly and functional expression of vSag-class II complexes are therefore essential to the viral life cycle. When inherited as germ line elements, Mtv proviruses expressing vSags during ontogeny trigger V_β-specific clonal elimination of immature T cells and profoundly shape the T-cell repertoire (for a review, see reference 1).vSags are type II integral membrane glycoproteins (14, 36). They possess up to six potential N-linked glycosylation sites, and carbohydrate addition is essential for vSag stability and activity (45). Their protein sequence is highly conserved among all MMTV strains except at the C-terminal 29 to 32 residues, which vary and confer T-cell V_β specificity (77). Biochemical analyses of vSag7 (minor lymphocyte stimulating locus 1, Mls-1^a) molecular forms after transfection into a murine B-cell line have identified a predominant 45-kDa endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase H (endo H)-sensitive ER-resident glycoprotein, as well as multiple highly glycosylated forms (74). It is thought that an 18-kDa C-terminal fragment binds MHC class II products (75). It has also been suggested that vSags associate weakly with class II in the ER and that proteolytic processing is required for the efficient assembly of vSag-class II complexes for presentation to T cells (46, 49, 75). As yet, the intracellular route that vSags take to the cell surface, the compartment in which they bind class II, and whether they associate with peptide-loaded class II dimers have been enigmatic.Newly synthesized MHC class II αβ heterodimers assemble with invariant chain (Ii), a type II integral membrane protein, to form an oligomeric complex in the ER (37). Ii prevents class II heterodimers from binding peptides in the ER and Golgi complex (55), and signals in its cytoplasmic tail sort the complex into the endocytic pathway (4, 42). In this acidic, protease-rich compartment, Ii is degraded and class II binds antigenic peptides. After the formation of peptide-class II dimers, the complexes are exported to the plasma membrane (8, 48). In the absence of Ii, class II αβ heterodimers exhibit defective post-ER transport, and their conversion into functionally mature, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-stable compact dimers by peptide antigens is affected (7, 16, 22, 70).A specialized endosomal compartment where class II peptide loading occurs, termed the MHC class II-enriched compartment (MIIC or CIIV), has been found recently in antigen-presenting cells (2, 50, 53, 58, 68, 71). Whether nascent Ii-class II complexes traffic directly to the MIIC from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) or transit first to early endosomes, either directly or via the cell surface, before entering late endocytic vesicles and MIIC is still under debate (26, 56, 57). Transport by all these routes most probably occurs to ensure the capture and loading of antigenic peptides throughout the endocytic pathway (12). MIIC vesicles are positive for lysosome-associated membrane proteins (LAMPs) and cathepsin D and are enriched for HLA-DM or H-2M (18, 32, 59), proteins that facilitate the catalytic exchange of class II-associated invariant peptide chain (CLIP) for antigenic peptides (19, 61, 62). The ultrastructural colocalization of DM with intracellular peptide-class II complexes suggests that the MIIC is a main site where class II dimers bind exogenous and endogenous peptide antigens (47, 58).Determining the route by which vSag protein(s) trafficks to the cell surface and the cellular location where vSag1 processing and assembly with class II molecules occurs is central to understanding the mechanism whereby vSags activate T cells to maintain the viral life cycle. It has been unclear whether vSags traffic independently by the constitutive exocytic pathway or with class II and Ii to the MIIC before reaching the cell surface. Reagents that alter class II expression have been shown to affect vSag presentation (43, 46). Furthermore, mice lacking Ii show reduced intrathymic V_β-specific T-cell deletion (70), suggesting that Ii may play a role, either by ensuring proper maturation of class II dimers or by targeting vSag-class II complexes to the MIIC, in promoting efficient vSag-induced immune responses.To investigate these issues, we used immunochemical detection of vSag1 protein in combination with subcellular fractionation and surface reexpression assays. We show that class II is required for stable vSag1 surface expression. vSag1 trafficks directly to the cell surface independently of class II, and reagents that alter the conversion of newly synthesized class II into peptide-loaded SDS-stable dimers affect functional vSag1 surface expression.     

Requirement of Myosin Vb��Rab11a��Rab11-FIP2 Complex in Cholesterol-regulated Translocation of NPC1L1 to the Cell Surface

Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1) plays a critical role in the enterohepatic absorption of free cholesterol. Cellular cholesterol depletion induces the transport of NPC1L1 from the endocytic recycling compartment to the plasma membrane (PM), and cholesterol replenishment causes the internalization of NPC1L1 together with cholesterol via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Although NPC1L1 has been characterized, the other proteins involved in cholesterol absorption and the endocytic recycling of NPC1L1 are largely unknown. Most of the vesicular trafficking events are dependent on the cytoskeleton and motor proteins. Here, we investigated the roles of the microfilament and microfilament-associated triple complex composed of myosin Vb, Rab11a, and Rab11-FIP2 in the transport of NPC1L1 from the endocytic recycling compartment to the PM. Interfering with the dynamics of the microfilament by pharmacological treatment delayed the transport of NPC1L1 to the cell surface. Meanwhile, inactivation of any component of the myosin Vb·Rab11a·Rab11-FIP2 triple complex inhibited the export of NPC1L1. Expression of the dominant-negative mutants of myosin Vb, Rab11a, or Rab11-FIP2 decreased the cellular cholesterol uptake by blocking the transport of NPC1L1 to the PM. These results suggest that the efficient transport of NPC1L1 to the PM is dependent on the microfilament-associated myosin Vb·Rab11a·Rab11-FIP2 triple complex.Cholesterol homeostasis in human bodies is maintained through regulated cholesterol synthesis, absorption, and excretion. Intestinal cholesterol absorption is one of the major pathways to maintain cholesterol balance. NPC1L1 (Niemann-Pick C1-like protein 1), a polytopic transmembrane protein highly expressed in the intestine and liver, is required for dietary cholesterol uptake and biliary cholesterol reabsorption (1–4). Genetic or pharmaceutical inactivation of NPC1L1 significantly inhibits cholesterol absorption and confers the resistance to diet-induced hypercholesterolemia (1, 2, 4). Ezetimibe, an NPC1L1-specific inhibitor, is currently used to prevent and treat cardiovascular diseases (5).Human NPC1L1 contains 1,332 residues with 13 transmembrane domains (6). The third to seventh transmembrane helices constitute a conserved sterol-sensing domain (4, 7). NPC1L1 recycles between the endocytic recycling compartment (ERC)³ and the plasma membrane (PM) in response to the changes of cholesterol level (8). ERC is a part of early endosomes that is involved in the recycling of many transmembrane proteins. It is also reported that ERC is a pool for free cholesterol storage (9). When cellular cholesterol concentration is low, NPC1L1 moves from the ERC to the PM (8, 10). Under cholesterol-replenishing conditions, NPC1L1 and cholesterol are internalized together and transported to the ERC (8). Disruption of microfilament, depletion of the clathrin·AP2 complex, or ezetimibe treatment can impede the endocytosis of NPC1L1, thereby decreasing cholesterol internalization (8, 10, 11).The microfilament (MF) system, part of the cytoskeleton network, is required for multiple cellular functions such as cell shape maintenance, cell motility, mitosis, protein secretion, and endocytosis (12, 13). The major players in the microfilament system are actin fibers and motor proteins (14). Actin fibers form a network that serves as the tracks for vesicular transport (15, 16). Meanwhile, the dynamic assembly and disassembly of actin fibers and the motor proteins provides the driving force for a multitude of membrane dynamics including endocytosis, exocytosis, and vesicular trafficking between compartments (15, 16).Myosins are a large family of motor proteins that are responsible for actin-based mobility (14). Class V myosins (17, 18), comprising myosin Va, Vb, and Vc, are involved in a wide range of vesicular trafficking events in different mammalian tissues. Myosin Va is expressed mainly in neuronal tissues (19, 20), whereas myosins Vb and Vc are universally expressed with enrichment in epithelial cells (21, 22). Class V myosins are recruited to their targeting vesicles by small GTPase proteins (Rab) (23). Rab11a and Rab11 family-interacting protein 2 (Rab11-FIP2) facilitate the binding of myosin Vb to the cargo proteins of endocytic recycling vesicles (24–28).Myosin Vb binds Rab11a and Rab11-FIP2 through the C-terminal tail (CT) domain. The triple complex of myosin Vb, Rab11a, and Rab11-FIP2 is critical for endocytic vesicular transport and the recycling of many proteins including transferrin receptor (29), AMPA receptors (30), CFTR (28), GLUT4 (31, 32), aquaporin-2 (26), and β2-adrenergic receptors (33). The myosin Vb-CT domain (24) competes for binding to Rab11a and Rab11-FIP2 and functions as a dominant-negative form. Expression of the CT domain substantially impairs the transport of vesicles. Deficient endocytic trafficking is also observed in cells expressing the GDP-locked form of Rab11a (S25N) (34) or a truncated Rab11-FIP2, which competes for the rab11a binding (35).Here we investigated the roles of actin fibers and motor proteins in the cholesterol-regulated endocytic recycling of NPC1L1. Using pharmaceutical inactivation, dominant-negative forms, and an siRNA technique, we demonstrated that actin fibers and myosin Vb·Rab11a·Rab11-FIP2 triple complex are involved in the export of NPC1L1 to the PM and that this intact MF-associated triple complex is required for efficient cholesterol uptake. Characterization of the molecules involved in the recycling of NPC1L1 may shed new light upon the mechanism of cholesterol absorption.     

Endosomal Trafficking of HIV-1 Gag and Genomic RNAs Regulates Viral Egress

HIV-1 Gag can assemble and generate virions at the plasma membrane, but it is also present in endosomes where its role remains incompletely characterized. Here, we show that HIV-1 RNAs and Gag are transported on endosomal vesicles positive for TiVamp, a v-SNARE involved in fusion events with the plasma membrane. Inhibition of endosomal traffic did not prevent viral release. However, inhibiting lysosomal degradation induced an accumulation of Gag in endosomes and increased viral production 7-fold, indicating that transport of Gag to lysosomes negatively regulates budding. This also suggested that endosomal Gag-RNA complexes could access retrograde pathways to the cell surface and indeed, depleting cells of TiVamp-reduced viral production. Moreover, inhibition of endosomal transport prevented the accumulation of Gag at sites of cellular contact. HIV-1 Gag could thus generate virions using two pathways, either directly from the plasma membrane or through an endosome-dependent route. Endosomal Gag-RNA complexes may be delivered at specific sites to facilitate cell-to-cell viral transmission.The production of infectious retroviral particles is an ordered process that includes many steps (for review see Refs. 1–3). In particular, three major viral components, Gag, the envelope, and genomic RNAs have to traffic inside the cell to reach their assembly site. Viral biogenesis is driven by the polyprotein Gag, which is able to make viral-like particles when expressed alone (4). Upon release, HIV-1⁴ Gag is processed by the viral protease into matrix (MA(p17)), capsid (CA(p24)), nucleocapsid (NC(p7)), p6, and smaller peptides SP1 and SP2. Gag contains several domains that are essential for viral assembly: a membrane binding domain (M) in MA; a Gag-Gag interaction domain in CA; an assembly domain (I) in NC; and a late domain (L) in p6, which recruits the cellular budding machinery. Genomic RNAs are specifically recognized by NC, and they play fundamental roles in viral biogenesis by acting as a scaffold for Gag multimerization (5).It has been demonstrated that retroviruses bud by hijacking the endosomal machinery that sorts proteins into internal vesicles of multivesicular bodies (for review, see Refs. 6, 7). Indeed, these vesicles bud with the same topology as viral particles. Proteins sorted into this pathway are usually destined for degradation in lysosomes, but some can also recycle to the plasma membrane (for review see Refs. 8, 9). They are also frequently ubiquitinated on their cytoplasmic domain (10, 11), allowing their recognition by ESCRT complexes. ESCRT-0 and ESCRT-I recognize ubiquitinated cargo present at the surface of endosomes and recruit other ESCRT complexes (12–14). ESCRT-III is believed to function directly in the formation of multivesicular body intralumenal vesicles (12), even though its mechanism of action is currently not understood. Remarkably, Gag L domains interact directly with components of the multivesicular body-sorting machinery (for review see Ref. 15). HIV-1 Gag uses a PTAP motif to bind Tsg101, a component of ESCRT-I (16–19), and a YPLTSL motif to interact with Alix, a protein linked to ESCRT-I and -III (20–22). Finally, various ubiquitin ligases are also required directly or indirectly during HIV-1 biogenesis (23, 24; for review see Ref. 25).In many cell lines, Gag is found both at the plasma membrane and in endosomes. This has led to the hypothesis that there are several assembly sites for HIV-1 (1, 3). First, Gag can initiate and complete assembly at the plasma membrane. This is thought to occur predominantly in T lymphocytes, and this process is supported by several lines of evidences: (i) disruption of endosomal trafficking with drugs does not prevent viral production (26, 27); (ii) ESCRT complexes can be recruited at the plasma membrane, at sites where Gag accumulates (28–30); (iii) Gag can be seen multimerizing and budding from the plasma membrane in live cells (31). Second, Gag could initiate assembly in endosomes, and then traffic to the cell surface to be released. This is mainly supported by the presence of Gag in endosomes in several cell lines (32–34), including T cells and more strikingly macrophages (32, 35, 36–39). However, we are currently lacking functional experiments addressing the role of this endosomal pool of Gag, and it is still not clear to what extent it contributes to the production of viral particles. Nevertheless, the presence of Gag in endosomes might facilitate recruitment of ESCRT complexes (34, 40), packaging of viral genomic RNAs (32, 41), and incorporation of the envelope (42). It may also be important for polarized budding (43, 44) and to create a viral reservoir in infected cells (45, 46).Despite great progress, the traffic of HIV-1 components is still not fully elucidated. In particular, the transport of the genomic RNAs is poorly understood. In this study, we have used single molecule techniques to investigate the trafficking of HIV-1 RNAs in fixed and live cells, and we show that they are transported on endosomal vesicles. We also obtained functional evidence that Gag and viral RNAs can use at least two trafficking pathways to produce virions, one going directly from the plasma membrane and another one passing through endosomes.     

A Coated Vesicle-associated Kinase of 104 kDa (CVAK104) Induces Lysosomal Degradation of Frizzled 5 (Fzd5)

Receptor internalization is recognized as an important mechanism for controlling numerous cell surface receptors. This event contributes not only to regulate signal transduction but also to adjust the amount of cell surface receptors. Frizzleds (Fzds) are seven-pass transmembrane receptor family proteins for Wnt ligands. Recent studies indicated that Fzd5 is internalized in response to Wnt stimulation to activate downstream signaling pathways. After internalization, it appears that Fzd5 is recycled back to the plasma membrane. However, whether internalized Fzd5 is sorted to lysosomes for protein degradation remains unclear. We here report that a coated vesicle-associated kinase of 104 kDa (CVAK104) selectively induces lysosomal degradation of Fzd5. We identify CVAK104 as a novel binding partner of Dishevelled (Dvl), a scaffold protein in the Wnt signaling pathway. Interestingly, we find that CVAK104 also interacts with Fzd5 but not with Fzd1 or Fzd4. CVAK104 selectively induces intracellular accumulation of Fzd5 via the clathrin-mediated pathway, which is suppressed by coexpression of a dominant negative form of Rab5. Fzd5 is subsequently degraded by a lysosomal pathway. Indeed, knockdown of endogenous CVAK104 by RNA interference results in an increase in the amount of Fzd5. In contrast, Wnt treatment induces Fzd5 internalization but does not stimulate its degradation. Overexpression or knockdown of CVAK104 results in a significant suppression or activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, respectively. These results suggest that CVAK104 regulates the amount of Fzd5 by inducing lysosomal degradation, which probably contributes to the suppression of the Wnt signaling pathway.Internalization of cell surface receptors is an important event to regulate signal transduction from the extracellular environment (1, 2). This event contributes to control the amount of receptors at the plasma membrane. Internalization mainly occurs via the clathrin-dependent pathway. It is characterized by the recruitment of adaptor protein (AP),² such as AP-2, and the assembly of a clathrin coat, which helps the inward budding of clathrin-coated vesicles (3). Internalized receptors are transported to early endosomes, from where they are either recycled back to the plasma membrane or directed to degradative components, such as lysosomes. Rab5, a member of the Rab family GTPase proteins that exert regulatory functions in the endocytic and exocytic trafficking, regulates the fusion of plasma membrane-derived vesicles with early endosomes and homotypic fusion among early endosomes (4).Accumulating data indicate that numerous regulatory proteins also play important roles in endocytic processes. Coated vesicle-associated kinase of 104 kDa (CVAK104) is one of these accessory proteins, which was recently discovered by mass spectroscopy analysis of AP preparations form bovine brain (5). Several groups reported that CVAK104 interacts with clathrin (5–7). In addition, CVAK104 binds to AP-2 and phosphorylates the β subunit of AP-2 in vitro, suggesting a role in the clathrin-mediated endocytosis (5). Furthermore, it was recently demonstrated that CVAK104 also functions in trafficking between the trans-Golgi network and endosomes. For example, knockdown of CVAK104 by small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) results in missorting of the lysosomal enzyme cathepsin D (6). CVAK104 also regulates sorting of t-SNARE proteins from the trans-Golgi network to late endosomes in which they function as an adaptor for docking and fusion of vesicles (7). These reports suggest an importance of CVAK104 in intracellular trafficking that occurs after endocytosis. The Wnt signaling pathway is evolutionarily conserved from nematodes to mammals and is involved in embryonic development and various human diseases, including cancer (8–10). In this signaling pathway, Dishevelled (Dvl) functions as an essential signal transducer from the Wnt receptors to downstream components. Dvl is composed of three conserved domains: an N-terminal Dishevelled-Axin (DIX) domain, a PSD95/Dlg/ZD1 (PDZ) domain in the middle, and a C-terminal Dishevelled-Egl10-pleckstrin (DEP) domain. It is well known that these three domains are required for protein-protein interaction to transduce signals to downstream targets. Dvl also possesses a region harboring positively charged (basic) amino acid residues (termed the basic region) (11–14). It is reported that the basic region is also required for interaction with several downstream signaling components. Indeed, Frat1 and NRX (nucleoredoxin) interact with Dvl through the basic region and the PDZ domain (15, 16). Furthermore, Par1 binds only to the basic region (17). These results suggest that the basic region plays a critical role in the function of Dvl.Frizzled (Fzd) receptors are seven-pass transmembrane proteins. The Fz genes were first identified in Drosophila in a screen for mutations that disrupt the polarity of epidermal cells in the adult fly (18). Ten genes encoding Fzds have been identified in the human genome (19), and the overall structure of Fzd receptors is well conserved among the 10 proteins and also throughout evolution (20, 21). Accumulating evidence indicates that Fzd receptors are internalized in response to their Wnt ligands. Wnt5a induces the internalization of Fzd4 (22). Wnt3a induces the internalization of Fzd5 via the clathrin-dependent pathway (23). In addition, Wnt11 cooperates with atypical receptor-related tyrosine kinase to promote the internalization of Fzd7 via the β-arrestin-2-dependent pathway (24). These ligand-dependent internalizations of Fzd receptors are required for activating signaling pathways. Recent studies also demonstrate that Dvl not only functions as a signal transducer but also plays important roles in internalization of the Fzd receptor. It has been reported that Dvl recruits β-arrestin-2 to internalize Fzd4 in response to Wnt5a treatment (22) and that interaction between Dvl and AP-2 is needed to stimulate internalization of Fzd4 (25). After internalization, cell surface receptors are generally recycled back to the plasma membrane or sorted to lysosomes for protein degradation. It has also been reported that Fzd5 internalized in a ligand-dependent manner appears to be recycled back to the plasma membrane, because internalized Fzd5 co-localizes with Rab11, which plays an important role in the recycling process (23). However, whether receptor degradation, another common consequence after receptor internalization, occurs in the case of Fzd5 still remains unknown.In this study, we search for in vivo Dvl binding partners and identify CVAK104 as a novel Dvl-interacting protein. We also find that CVAK104 interacts with Fzd5 and that expression of CVAK104 induces intracellular accumulation of Fzd5 through the clathrin-dependent pathway. Interestingly, CVAK104 selectively interacts with and induces accumulation of Fzd5 but not Fzd1 or Fzd4. In addition, we find that Fzd5 internalized in the presence of CVAK104 is subsequently degraded by a lysosomal pathway, suggesting a novel mechanism for regulating the turnover of a specific subclass of Fzd receptors.     

Targeting a Polyepitope Protein Incorporating Multiple Class II-Restricted Viral Epitopes to the Secretory/Endocytic Pathway Facilitates Immune Recognition by CD4+ Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes: a Novel Approach to Vaccine Design

The role of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ cells in the generation of an effective immune response against viral infections is well established. Moreover, there is an increasing realization that subunit vaccines which include both CD4⁺- and CD8⁺-T-cell epitopes are highly effective in controlling viral infections, as opposed to those which are designed to activate a CD8⁺- or CD4⁺-T-cell response alone. One of the major limitations of epitope-based vaccines designed to stimulate virus-specific CD4⁺ T cells is that endogenously expressed class II-restricted minimal cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes are poorly recognized by CD4⁺ CTLs. In the present study we attempted to enhance the efficiency of class II-restricted endogenous presentation of minimal class II-restricted CTL epitopes by specifically targeting a polyepitope protein to class II processing compartments through the endosomal and/or lysosomal pathway. A significantly enhanced stimulation of virus-specific CD4⁺-T-cell clones by antigen-presenting cells (APC) expressing the recombinant polyepitope protein targeted to the endocytic/secretory pathway was readily demonstrated in cytotoxicity assays. In addition, in vitro activation of Epstein-Barr virus- and influenza virus-specific CD4⁺ memory CTLs by the recombinant constructs encoding the polyepitope protein, specifically targeted to the lysosomal compartment, was also demonstrated. The enhanced stimulatory capacity of APC expressing a lysosome-targeted polyepitope protein has important implications for vaccine design.There is now increasing evidence to suggest that both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells are critical for the generation of an effective immune response against intracellular pathogens. Although both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells recognize nonnative forms of the antigen in association with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, the presentation of antigen to these two types of T lymphocytes occurs through distinct pathways (24). In fact, the disparity in antigen presentation to these T cells is not due to processing differences but rather reflects the differences in the capacities of class I and class II molecules to bind antigenic determinants in an intracellular compartment. Indeed, earlier studies have shown that for processing and interaction with MHC class II molecules, antigen expressed de novo needs to be targeted to an endosomal or lysosomal compartment (5). There are two major pathways by which antigens are targeted to these compartments. The traditional pathway involves the phagocytosis or endocytosis of exogenous antigens, followed by degradation by acid proteases in the endosomal or lysosomal compartments (3, 8, 26, 41). On the other hand, class II-restricted presentation of endogenously synthesized proteins mainly involves membrane antigens which are thought to enter the endosomal or lysosomal pathway by internalization from the cell surface (11). Although, in certain experimental systems, cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins may also enter this endogenous pathway, generally these proteins are targets for the class I processing pathway (9, 14, 20, 27).One of the major limitations of the epitope-based vaccines designed to stimulate virus-specific CD4⁺ T cells is that endogenously expressed class II-restricted minimal cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes are poorly recognized by CD4⁺ CTLs (2, 35, 38). Based on these observations, we reasoned that a molecular approach that directly routes these epitopes into the MHC class II pathway, such as the endocytic or lysosomal compartments, might facilitate endogenous presentation to CD4⁺ T cells. The lysosome-associated membrane protein (LAMP-1) and the invariant chain (Ii) are transmembrane proteins which are localized predominantly in the lysosomes and endosomes, respectively. The cytoplasmic domains of these proteins contain specific targeting signals that mediate their translocation to the specific compartments. We therefore designed a chimeric polyepitope construct capable of encoding multiple class II-restricted CTL epitopes from Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and influenza virus linked to the cytoplasmic and/or transmembrane domains of LAMP-1 and the Ii protein, with the aim of targeting the epitopes to the endosomal and lysosomal compartments. The data presented in this study clearly demonstrate that if the endogenously synthesized polyepitope protein is targeted to the endocytic/secretory pathway, processing and presentation of all the epitopes are dramatically enhanced. More importantly, minimal epitope sequences, without any natural flanking sequences, were adequate for efficient stimulation of the virus-specific memory CTL response, a result that has important implications for epitope-based vaccine design.     

Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Algorithms for Finding Small Attractors in Boolean Networks

A Boolean network is a model used to study the interactions between different genes in genetic regulatory networks. In this paper, we present several algorithms using gene ordering and feedback vertex sets to identify singleton attractors and small attractors in Boolean networks. We analyze the average case time complexities of some of the proposed algorithms. For instance, it is shown that the outdegree-based ordering algorithm for finding singleton attractors works in time for , which is much faster than the naive time algorithm, where is the number of genes and is the maximum indegree. We performed extensive computational experiments on these algorithms, which resulted in good agreement with theoretical results. In contrast, we give a simple and complete proof for showing that finding an attractor with the shortest period is NP-hard.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Mapping of Vps21 and HOPS Binding Sites in Vps8 and Effect of Binding Site Mutants on Endocytic Trafficking

Vps8 is a subunit of the CORVET tethering complex, which is involved in early-to-late endosome fusion. Here, we examine the role of Vps8 in membrane fusion at late endosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We demonstrate that Vps8 associates with membranes and that this association is independent of the class C/HOPS core complex and, contrary to a previous report, also independent of the Rab GTPase Vps21. Our data indicate that Vps8 makes multiple contacts with membranes. One of these membrane binding regions could be mapped to the N-terminal part of the protein. By two-hybrid analysis, we obtained evidence for a physical interaction between Vps8 and the Rab5 homologue Vps21. In addition, the interaction with the HOPS core complex was confirmed by immunoprecipitation experiments. By deletion analysis, the Vps21 and HOPS binding sites were mapped in Vps8. Deletions that abrogated HOPS core complex binding had a strong effect on the turnover of the endocytic cargo protein Ste6 and on vacuolar sorting of carboxypeptidase Y. In contrast, deletions that abolished Vps21 binding showed only a modest effect. This suggests that the Vps21 interaction is not essential for endosomal trafficking but may be important for some other aspect of Vps8 function.The compartments of the exocytic/endocytic membrane system are dynamic structures that continuously exchange materials by budding and fusion of transport vesicles. Despite this continuous exchange, the compartments maintain their specific identities. A basic machinery consisting of tethering factors, Rab GTPases, SNARE proteins, and Sec1/Munc18 (SM) proteins accomplishes membrane targeting and fusion. For each individual membrane fusion event, a characteristic set of proteins is used.We are interested in a particular membrane fusion step, the fusion of early endosome-derived vesicles with late endosomes. Screening for vps (vacuolar protein sorting) mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified factors involved in this fusion step (3). Mutants defective in the early-to-late endosome trafficking step belong to the class D group of vps mutants, whose hallmark is an enlarged vacuole (21). Among the class D functions, representatives of the main groups of targeting and fusion factors can be found. The Q-SNARE protein Pep12, for instance, a member of the syntaxin family, serves as a marker for late endosomal membranes (2). Together with the Q-SNAREs Vti1 and Syn8 or Tlg1, it forms two alternative t-SNARE complexes on late endosomal membranes (17). These t-SNAREs combine with the v-SNARES Snc1/Snc2 or Ykt6 to form functional trans-SNARE complexes. Pep12 functionally interacts with another class D protein, the SM protein Vps45 (4). Another component of the basic fusion machinery at late endosomes is the class D protein Vps21, a member of the Rab GTPase family and the yeast homologue of mammalian Rab5 (8, 12, 30). Rab proteins are key regulators of membrane fusion (9). They are involved in the recruitment of tethering and docking factors, and by their interplay with Rab effectors they contribute to the establishment of specific membrane domains. Another class D protein connected to Rab function is Vps9, a guanidine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Vps21 (11).Additional class D proteins are involved in vesicle tethering at late endosomes. Basically, there are two kinds of tethers, proteins containing extensive coiled-coil domains and large multisubunit complexes (33). The prototype of the coiled-coil tethers is p115, with its yeast homologue Uso1, involved in tethering of vesicles to Golgi apparatus membranes (25). Another member of this class is EEA1, which is involved in tethering of vesicles to endosomes. The yeast class D protein Vps19/Pep7/Vac1 could be functionally similar to EEA1 (16). Two further class D proteins, Vps3 and Vps8, are part of the multisubunit (class C core vacuole/endosome tethering) CORVET tethering complex (20, 32). This complex shares core components with the HOPS (homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting) tethering complex involved in homotypic vacuolar fusion (28). This core complex, the class C Vps complex, consists of Vps11/Pep5, Vps16, Vps18/Pep3, and the SM protein Vps33 (26). Instead of Vps3 and Vps8, HOPS contains two additional subunits, Vps39/Vam6 and Vps41 (35), which appear to be functionally equivalent to Vps3 and Vps8 (20). In addition to bridging donor and acceptor membranes, tethers appear to be involved in coordinating Rab and SNARE functions. This was suggested by the finding that the equivalent CORVET/HOPS subunits Vps3 and Vps39/Vam6 both display GEF activity toward their respective Rab proteins, Vps21 and Ypt7 (20, 35). In addition, whole tethering complexes act as Rab effectors by binding to activated Rab-GTP and interact with the corresponding SNARE complexes (6, 20, 31).How exactly the tethers coordinate Rab and SNARE functions during membrane fusion is at present unclear. Here, we examine the function of the CORVET subunit Vps8 (5, 13) in membrane fusion at late endosomes in yeast. We demonstrate that Vps8 directly associates with membranes. Contrary to a previous report (13), we show that this membrane association is not dependent on Vps21. We further investigate the functional relationship between Vps8 and Vps21. We found that Vps21 physically interacts with Vps8 but that this interaction does not appear to be absolutely required for endosomal trafficking. Finally, we speculate that Vps8 could be part of a higher-order structure.     

Stomatin-like Protein-1 Interacts with Stomatin and Is Targeted to Late Endosomes

The human stomatin-like protein-1 (SLP-1) is a membrane protein with a characteristic bipartite structure containing a stomatin domain and a sterol carrier protein-2 (SCP-2) domain. This structure suggests a role for SLP-1 in sterol/lipid transfer and transport. Because SLP-1 has not been investigated, we first studied the molecular and cell biological characteristics of the expressed protein. We show here that SLP-1 localizes to the late endosomal compartment, like stomatin. Unlike stomatin, SLP-1 does not localize to the plasma membrane. Overexpression of SLP-1 leads to the redistribution of stomatin from the plasma membrane to late endosomes suggesting a complex formation between these proteins. We found that the targeting of SLP-1 to late endosomes is caused by a GYXXΦ (Φ being a bulky, hydrophobic amino acid) sorting signal at the N terminus. Mutation of this signal results in plasma membrane localization. SLP-1 and stomatin co-localize in the late endosomal compartment, they co-immunoprecipitate, thus showing a direct interaction, and they associate with detergent-resistant membranes. In accordance with the proposed lipid transfer function, we show that, under conditions of blocked cholesterol efflux from late endosomes, SLP-1 induces the formation of enlarged, cholesterol-filled, weakly LAMP-2-positive, acidic vesicles in the perinuclear region. This massive cholesterol accumulation clearly depends on the SCP-2 domain of SLP-1, suggesting a role for this domain in cholesterol transfer to late endosomes.Human stomatin-like protein-1 (SLP-1),³ also known as STOML-1, STORP (1), slipin-1 (2), or hUNC-24 (3), is the human orthologue of Caenorhabditis elegans UNC-24 and a member of the stomatin protein family that comprises 5 human members: stomatin (4–6), SLP-1 (1, 7), SLP-2 (8), SLP-3 (9, 10), and podocin (11). SLP-1 is predominantly expressed in the brain, heart, and skeletal muscle (7, 8) and can be identified in most other tissues (1). Its structure contains a hydrophilic N terminus, a 30-residue hydrophobic domain that is thought to anchor the protein to the cytoplasmic side of the membrane, followed by a stomatin/prohibitin/flotillin/HflK/C (SPFH) domain (12) that is also known as prohibitin (PHB) domain (13), and a C-terminal sterol carrier protein-2 (SCP-2)/nonspecific lipid transfer protein domain (14, 15). This unique structure that was first revealed in C. elegans UNC-24 (16) suggests that SLP-1 may be involved in lipid transfer and transport (17).The founder of the family, stomatin, is a major protein of the red blood cell membrane (band 7.2) and is ubiquitously expressed (18). It is missing in red cells of patients with overhydrated hereditary stomatocytosis, a pathological condition characterized by increased permeability of the red cells for monovalent ions and stomatocytic morphology (19, 20). However, the lack of stomatin is not due to a mutation in its gene but rather to a transport defect (21, 22). Stomatin is a monotopic, oligomeric, palmitoylated, cholesterol-binding membrane protein (18) that is associated with lipid rafts (23, 24) or raft-like detergent-resistant membranes (DRMs) (25), serving as a respective marker (26–28). Other stomatin family members like podocin (29, 30) and SLP-3 (9) are also enriched in DRMs. Many SPFH/PHB proteins share this property suggesting that the SPFH/PHB domain plays an important role in lipid raft/DRM targeting (13, 31). Several interactions of stomatin with membrane proteins have been revealed, notably with the acid sensing ion channels (32) and the glucose transporter GLUT1 (33, 34). Interestingly, stomatin functions as a switch of GLUT1 specificity from glucose to dehydroascorbate in the human red blood cell thus increasing vitamin C recycling and compensating the human inability to synthesize vitamin C (35).The C. elegans genome contains 10 members of the stomatin family. Defects in three of these genes (mec-2, unc-1, and unc-24) cause distinct neuropathologic phenotypes, namely uncoordinated movement and defect in mechanosensation, respectively (36, 37). These are explained by dysfunction of the respective stomatin-like proteins in complex with degenerin/epithelial sodium channels that also affects the sensitivity to volatile anesthetics (38, 39). Importantly, MEC-2 and human podocin bind cholesterol and form large supercomplexes with various ion channels thus modulating channel activity (40). The biological functions of the SLP-1 orthologue UNC-24 and stomatin orthologue UNC-1 are associated, because the unc-24 gene controls the distribution or stability of the UNC-1 protein (41). In addition, UNC-24 co-localizes and interacts with MEC-2 and is essential for touch sensitivity (36). Based on these observations, we hypothesize that human stomatin and SLP-1 similarly interact and modify the distribution of each other. These proteins may have important functions in regulating the activity of ion channels in the human brain and muscle tissues. Despite its putative role in cellular lipid distribution, SLP-1 has not been studied to date.In this work, we characterized human SLP-1 as a late endosomal protein and identified an N-terminal GYXXΦ motif as the targeting signal. We found that SLP-1 interacts with stomatin in vitro and in vivo and associates with DRMs. Regarding the proposed lipid transfer function, we showed that SLP-1 induces the formation of large, cholesterol-rich vesicles or vacuoles when cholesterol trafficking from the late endosomes is blocked suggesting a net cholesterol transfer to the late endosomes and/or lysosomes. This effect was clearly attributed to the SCP-2/nonspecific lipid transfer protein domain of SLP-1, in line with the original hypothesis.     

The Wavelet-Based Cluster Analysis for Temporal Gene Expression Data

A variety of high-throughput methods have made it possible to generate detailed temporal expression data for a single gene or large numbers of genes. Common methods for analysis of these large data sets can be problematic. One challenge is the comparison of temporal expression data obtained from different growth conditions where the patterns of expression may be shifted in time. We propose the use of wavelet analysis to transform the data obtained under different growth conditions to permit comparison of expression patterns from experiments that have time shifts or delays. We demonstrate this approach using detailed temporal data for a single bacterial gene obtained under 72 different growth conditions. This general strategy can be applied in the analysis of data sets of thousands of genes under different conditions.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]