Reconstructive management of contralateral breast cancer in patients who previously underwent unilateral breast reconstruction

When a patient who has had unilateral breast reconstruction presents with a new cancer on the opposite side, the reconstructive management of the second breast can be unclear. This study was performed to determine whether reconstruction of the second breast is oncologically reasonable and to evaluate the reconstructive options available to these patients.Patients who had mastectomy with unilateral breast reconstruction between 1988 and 1994 and who had a minimal follow-up of 5 years from the initial breast cancer were reviewed. Of 469 patients reviewed, 18 patients (4 percent) were identified who developed contralateral breast cancer. Mean age at the initial breast cancer presentation was 43 years (range, 26 to 57 years), and mean age at presentation with contralateral breast cancer was 48 years (range, 36 to 67). The mean interval between the initial and contralateral breast cancer presentations was 5 years (range, 1 to 10 years). Mean follow-up from the time of contralateral breast cancer was 5 years (range, 1 to 9 years). In most cases, contralateral breast cancer presented at an early stage (13 of 18 patients; 72 percent), and a shift to an earlier stage at presentation of the contralateral cancer was evident compared with the initial breast cancer. Of the 18 patients who developed contralateral breast cancer, 16 (89 percent) had no evidence of disease, one was alive with disease, and one died. Reconstructive management after the initial mastectomy included 16 transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps (seven free and nine pedicled), one latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap with implant, and one superior gluteal free flap. Surgical management of the second breast after contralateral breast cancer included breast conservation in two patients, mastectomy without reconstruction in four, and mastectomy with reconstruction in 12. Reconstruction of the second breast included one free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, three extended latissimus dorsi flaps, two latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps with implants, three implants alone, two Rubens flaps, and one superior gluteal free flap. No major complications were noted after the reconstruction of the second breast. The best symmetry was obtained when similar methods and tissues were used on both sides.The incidence of contralateral breast cancer after mastectomy and unilateral breast reconstruction is low. In most cases, contralateral breast cancer presents at an earlier stage compared with the initial breast cancer, and the prognosis is good. In patients who develop a contralateral breast cancer after mastectomy and unilateral breast reconstruction, the reconstruction of the second breast after mastectomy is oncologically reasonable and should be offered to provide optimal breast symmetry and a better quality of life. The best result is obtained when similar methods and tissues are used on both sides.     

Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction

In patients with early-stage breast cancer who are scheduled to undergo mastectomy and desire breast reconstruction, the optimal timing of reconstruction depends on whether postmastectomy radiation therapy will be needed. Immediate reconstruction offers the best aesthetic outcomes if postmastectomy radiation therapy is not needed, but if postmastectomy radiation therapy is required, delayed reconstruction is preferable to avoid potential aesthetic and radiation-delivery problems. Unfortunately, the need for postmastectomy radiation therapy cannot be reliably determined until review of the permanent tissue sections. The authors recently implemented a two-stage approach, delayed-immediate breast reconstruction, to optimize reconstruction in patients at risk for requiring postmastectomy radiation therapy when the need for postmastectomy radiation therapy is not known at the time of mastectomy. Stage 1 consists of skin-sparing mastectomy with insertion of a completely filled textured saline tissue expander. After review of permanent sections, patients who did not require post-mastectomy radiation therapy underwent immediate reconstruction (stage 2) and patients who required postmastectomy radiation therapy completed postmastectomy radiation therapy and then underwent standard delayed reconstruction. In this study, the feasibility and outcomes of this approach were reviewed. Fourteen patients were treated with delayed-immediate reconstruction between May of 2002 and June of 2003. Twelve patients had unilateral reconstruction and two patients had bilateral reconstruction, for a total of 16 treated breasts. All patients completed stage 1. Tissue expanders were inserted subpectorally in 15 breasts and subcutaneously in one breast. The mean intraoperative expander fill volume was 475 cc (range, 250 to 750 cc). Three patients required postmastectomy radiation therapy and underwent delayed reconstruction. Eleven patients did not require postmastectomy radiation therapy. Nine patients had 11 breast reconstructions (stage 2), six with free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps, one with a superior gluteal artery perforator flap, and four with a latissimus dorsi flap plus an implant. The median interval between stages was 13 days (range, 11 to 22 days). Two patients who did not require postmastectomy radiation therapy have not yet had stage 2 reconstruction, one because she wished to delay reconstruction and the other because she required additional tissue expansion before permanent implant placement. Six complications occurred. The stage 1 complications involved two cases of mastectomy skin necrosis in patients who required post-mastectomy radiation therapy; one patient required removal of the subcutaneously placed expander before postmastectomy radiation therapy and the other patient had a subpectorally placed expander that only required local wound care. The stage 2 complications were a recipient-site seroma in a patient with a latissimus dorsi flap, a recipient-site hematoma in the patient with the superior gluteal artery perforator flap, and two arterial thromboses in patients with TRAM flaps. Both TRAM flaps were salvaged. Delayed-immediate reconstruction is technically feasible and safe in patients with early-stage breast cancer who may require postmastectomy radiation therapy. With this approach, patients who do not require postmastectomy radiation therapy can achieve aesthetic outcomes essentially the same as those with immediate reconstruction, and patients who require postmastectomy radiation therapy can avoid the aesthetic and radiation-delivery problems that can occur after an immediate breast reconstruction.     

Postoperative adjuvant irradiation: effects on tranverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction

The use of postoperative irradiation following oncologic breast surgery is dictated by tumor pathology, margins, and lymph node involvement. Although irradiation negatively influences implant reconstruction, it is less clear what effect it has on autogenous tissue. This study evaluated the effect of postoperative irradiation on transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction. A retrospective review was performed on all patients undergoing immediate TRAM flap breast reconstruction followed by postoperative irradiation between 1988 and 1998. Forty-one patients with a median age of 48 years received an average of 50.99 Gy of fractionated irradiation within 6 months after breast reconstruction. All except two received adjuvant chemotherapy. Data were obtained from personal communication, physical examination, chart, and photographic review. The minimum follow-up time was 1 year, with an average of 3 years, after completion of radiation therapy. Nine patients received pedicled TRAM flaps and 32 received reconstruction with microvascular transfer. Fourteen patients had bilateral reconstruction, but irradiation was administered unilaterally to the breast with the higher risk of local recurrence. The remaining 27 patients had unilateral reconstruction. All patients were examined at least 1 year after radiotherapy. No flap loss occurred, but 10 patients (24 percent) required an additional flap to correct flap contracture. Nine patients (22 percent) maintained a normal breast volume. Hyperpigmentation occurred in 37 percent of the patients, and 56 percent were noted to have a firm reconstruction. Palpable fat necrosis was noted in 34 percent of the flaps and loss of symmetry in 78 percent. Because the numbers were small, there was no statistical difference between the pedicled and free TRAM group. However, as a group, the findings were statistically significant when compared with 1,443 nonirradiated TRAM patients. Despite the success of flap transfer, unpredictable volume, contour, and symmetry loss make it difficult to achieve consistent results using immediate TRAM breast reconstruction with postoperative irradiation. TRAM flap reconstruction in this setting should be approached cautiously, and delayed reconstruction in selected patients should be considered. Patients should be aware that multiple revisions and, possibly, additional flaps are necessary to correct the progressive deformity from radiation therapy.     

Breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty: treatment by skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction

Breast conservation has been associated with poor cosmetic outcome when used to treat breast cancer in patients who have undergone prior augmentation mammaplasty. Radiation therapy of the augmented breast can increase breast fibrosis and capsular contraction. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction are examined as an alternative treatment.Six patients with prior breast augmentation were treated for breast cancer by skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. One patient underwent a contralateral prophylactic skin-sparing mastectomy. Silicone gel implants had been placed in the submuscular location in five patients and in the subglandular position in one patient a mean of 10.2 years (range, 6 to 20 years) before breast cancer diagnosis. The mean patient age was 41.3 years (range, 33 to 56 years). Four independent judges reviewed postoperative photographs to grade the aesthetic results in comparison with the opposite native or reconstructed breast.The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging was stage 0 in one patient, stage I for four patients, and stage II for one patient. Five of the six patients presented with a palpable breast mass. Latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction was performed in four patients (bilaterally in one) and a transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap was used in two patients. Three patients were treated by skin-sparing mastectomy with preservation of the breast implant (two patients with latissimus flaps, and one patient with a TRAM flap). The tumor location necessitated the removal of implants in two patients (one patient with a latissimus flap and one with a TRAM. A saline implant was placed under the latissimus flap after gel implant removal. The patient who underwent bilateral skin-sparing mastectomies desired explantation and placement of saline implants. No remedial surgery was performed on the opposite breast to achieve symmetry. Complications occurred in two patients at the latissimus dorsi donor site (seroma in one patient, and seroma and infection in one). Five patients underwent complete nipple reconstructions. The mean duration of follow-up was 33.6 months (range, 15.5 to 70.3 months), and there were no recurrences of breast cancer. The aesthetic results were judged to be good to excellent in all cases.Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction can be used in patients with prior breast augmentation, with good to excellent cosmetic results. Depending on the tumor and implant location, the implant may be preserved without compromising local control.     

Reconstruction of large sacral defects following total sacrectomy

Total sacrectomies for cancer ablation often result in extensive defects that are challenging to reconstruct. In an effort to elucidate the criteria to select the most effective reconstructive options, we reviewed our experience with the management of large sacral wound defects. All patients who had a sacral defect reconstruction after a total sacrectomy at our institution between January of 1993 and August of 1998 were reviewed. The size of the defect, the type of reconstruction, postoperative complications, and functional outcome in each patient were assessed. A total of 27 flaps were performed in 25 patients for sacral defect reconstruction after a total sacrectomy. Diagnoses consisted of chordoma (n = 13), giant cell carcinoma (n = 2), sarcoma (n = 5), rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 4), and radiation induced necrosis (n = 1). The size of sacral defects ranged from 18 to 450 cm2 (mean, 189.8 cm2). Ten patients, including five who had preoperative radiation therapy, underwent transpelvic vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap reconstruction for sacral defects with a mean size of 203.3 cm2. Of these, five patients (50 percent) had complications (four minor wound dehiscences and one seroma). Eight patients, including one who had preoperative radiation therapy, underwent bilateral gluteal advancement flap reconstruction for sacral defects with a mean size of 198.0 cm2. They had no complications. Two patients, both of whom had preoperative radiation therapy, underwent gluteal rotation flap reconstruction for sacral defects of 120 cm2 and 144 cm2. Both patients had complications (one partial flap loss and one nonhealing wound requiring a free flap). Three patients, including one who had preoperative radiation therapy, underwent reconstruction with combined gluteal and posterior thigh flaps for sacral defects with a mean size of 246 cm2; two of these patients had partial necrosis of the posterior thigh flaps. Three patients, all of whom had preoperative radiation therapy, underwent free flap reconstruction for sacral defects with a mean size of 144.3 cm2. They had no complications. Our experience suggests that there are three reliable options for the reconstruction of large sacral wound defects: bilateral gluteal advancement flaps, transpelvic rectus myocutaneous flaps, and free flaps. In patients with no preoperative radiation therapy and intact gluteal vessels, the use of bilateral gluteal advancement flaps should be considered. In patients with a history of radiation to the sacral area and in patients whose gluteal vessels have been damaged, the use of the transpelvic VRAM flap should be considered. If the transpelvic VRAM flap cannot be used because of previous abdominal surgery, a free flap should be considered as a last option.     

Comparison of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Tumor pathologic features and the extent of nodal involvement dictate whether radiation therapy is given after mastectomy for breast cancer. It is generally well accepted that radiation negatively influences the outcome of implant-based breast reconstruction. However, the long-term effect of radiation therapy on the outcome of breast reconstruction with the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap is still unclear. For patients who need postmastectomy radiation therapy, the optimal timing of TRAM flap reconstruction is controversial. This study compares the outcome of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients who received postmastectomy radiation therapy.All patients at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center who received postmastectomy radiation therapy and who also underwent free TRAM flap breast reconstruction between January of 1988 and December of 1998 were included in the study. Patients who received radiation therapy before delayed TRAM flap reconstruction were compared with patients who underwent immediate TRAM flap reconstruction before radiation therapy. Early and late complications were compared between the two groups. Early complications included vessel thrombosis, partial or total flap loss, mastectomy skin flap necrosis, and local wound-healing problems, whereas late complications included fat necrosis, volume loss, and flap contracture of free TRAM breast mounds. Late complications were evaluated at least 1 year after the completion of radiation therapy for patients who had delayed reconstruction and at least 1 year after reconstruction for patients who had immediate reconstruction.During the study period, 32 patients had immediate TRAM flap reconstruction before radiation therapy and 70 patients had radiation therapy before TRAM flap reconstruction. Mean follow-up times for the immediate reconstruction and delayed reconstruction groups were 3 and 5 years, respectively. The mean radiation dose was 50 Gy in the immediate reconstruction group and 51 Gy in the delayed reconstruction group.One complete flap loss occurred in the delayed reconstruction group, and no flap loss occurred in the immediate reconstruction group. The incidence of early complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, the incidence of late complications was significantly higher in the immediate reconstruction group than in the delayed reconstruction group (87.5 percent versus 8.6 percent; p = 0.000). Nine patients (28 percent) in the immediate reconstruction group required an additional flap to correct the distorted contour from flap shrinkage and severe flap contraction.These findings indicate that, in patients who are candidates for free TRAM flap breast reconstruction and need postmastectomy radiation therapy, reconstruction should be delayed until radiation therapy is complete.     

Postmastectomy reconstruction of the previously augmented breast: diagnosis, staging, methodology, and outcome

Although many of the health and safety issues associated with breast augmentation have been thoroughly discussed over the past decade, the literature is remarkably silent regarding postmastectomy reconstruction of the previously augmented breast. A retrospective review of the senior author's reconstructive practice was performed for the years 1983 through March of 1999, revealing 21 women who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction after previous breast augmentation. For purposes of measuring aesthetic results, these 21 patients were matched to a carefully selected control group of 15 patients. They were also compared with other, larger populations, including 777 of the senior author's other breast reconstructions, the breast cancer registry at the Lombardi Cancer Center in Washington, D.C., and several large, published epidemiologic studies.The interval between the previous augmentation and the diagnosis of breast cancer ranged from 9 months to 18 years, with a mean of 9.3 years. None of the previous augmentation implants was ruptured at the time of mastectomy. Of the nine patients with previous subpectoral augmentation, cancer was detected mammographically in five (56 percent), whereas of the 12 patients with previous subglandular augmentation, cancer was first detected mammographically in only three (25 percent). This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). Overall, eight of the study patients' tumors (38 percent) were first detected mammographically, which is similar to other published reports of breast cancer patients in the general population. Seventy-one percent of the 21 study patients were node-negative, which also compares favorably with other published series.Sixteen of the women with previous augmentation (76 percent) had purely prosthetic reconstructions. Flaps were used in the other five reconstructions (23 percent): three latissimus dorsi flaps (14 percent) and two transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps (9 percent). All five flaps were used in patients who had undergone radiation therapy. Throughout the senior author's entire reconstructive practice history, transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps were more frequently used [282 of 777 nonaugmented reconstructions (36 percent)], whereas latissimus dorsi flaps were less frequently used [17 of 777 nonaugmented reconstructions (2.2 percent)] (p < 0.001).The cosmetic results of the breast reconstructions in the previously augmented study group were generally good-to-excellent, with a mean score by blinded observers of 3.35 of a possible 4.0. These results were comparable to or better than those in the matched controls, who scored a mean of 3.0.     

Immediate breast reconstruction using a laparoscopically harvested omental flap

Use of an omental flap to reconstruct the breast after cancer surgery was first reported by Kiricuta in 1963. Since then, the omentum has been widely used in cancer surgery to cover extensive thoracic defects associated with radionecrosis. In contrast, for breast reconstruction or augmentation mammaplasty, rectus abdominis and latissimus dorsi flaps have been used far more often than omental flaps. This article describes a new technique for immediate breast reconstruction using laparoscopically harvested omentum and reports the results obtained in 10 patients. Nine patients underwent immediate breast reconstruction after subcutaneous mastectomy. In the other patient, omentum was used in combination with skin grafting to cover a postmastectomy defect. Follow-up exceeded 16 months in the first patients. The results suggest that breast reconstruction using a laparoscopically harvested omental flap may be extremely dependable in terms of vascular supply (there was one case of partial necrosis, which healed with local management alone). The postoperative course of all patients was uneventful, and the use of laparoscopy reduced the hospital stay to less than 7 days. Donor-site scars were minimal. There was no residual loss of function, and there were no cases of incisional ventral hernia. Cosmetic results were satisfactory, with a soft breast that was both natural in appearance and stable in volume. However, in two patients the amount of omentum was found to be inadequate during the procedure; consequently, an implant was inserted under the omental flap. Breast reconstruction using a laparoscopically harvested omental flap is a new technique that allows autogenous reconstruction without disfigurement of the do-nor site and that results in a soft, natural-looking breast.     

Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications

A retrospective review was performed of one surgeon's experience with 40 consecutive patients who had undergone two-stage saline-filled implant breast reconstruction and radiation during the period from 1990 through 1997. A randomly selected group of 40 other two-stage saline-filled implant breast reconstructions from the same surgeon and time period served as controls. This review was undertaken because of the absence of specific information on the outcome of staged saline implant reconstructions in the radiated breast. Previously published reports on silicone gel implants and radiation have been contradictory. At the same time, the criteria for the use of radiation in the treatment of breast cancer have been expanded and the numbers of reconstruction patients who have been radiated are increasing dramatically. For example, in a 1985 report on immediate breast reconstruction, only 1 of 185 patients over a 6-year period underwent adjuvant radiation therapy, whereas in this review, there were 40 radiated breasts with saline-filled implants, 19 of which received adjuvant radiation therapy during their expansion. The study parameters included patient age, breast cup size, implant size, length of follow-up, number of procedures, coincident flap operations, Baker classification, complications, opposite breast procedures, pathologic stage, indications for and details about the radiation, and outcomes. The use of radiation in this review of reconstructed breasts can logically be divided into four groups: previous lumpectomy and radiation (n = 7), mastectomy and radiation before reconstruction (n = 9), mastectomy and adjuvant radiation during reconstruction/expansion (n = 19), and radiation after reconstruction (n = 5). The largest and most rapidly growing group of patients is of those receiving postmastectomy adjuvant radiation therapy. A total of 47.5 percent (19 of 40) of radiated breasts with saline implants ultimately needed the addition of, or replacement by, a flap. Ten percent of a control group with nonradiated saline implant reconstructions also had flaps, none as replacements. Fifty percent or more of both the radiated and control groups had contralateral surgery. Complications were far more common in the radiated group; for example, there were 32.5 percent capsular contractures compared with none in the control group. The control nonradiated implant-only group and the flap plus implant radiated group did well cosmetically. The radiated implant-only group was judged the worst. The increasing use of radiation after mastectomy has important implications for breast reconstruction. The possibility for radiation should be thoroughly investigated and anticipated preoperatively before immediate breast reconstruction. Patients with invasive disease, particularly with large tumors or palpable axillary lymph nodes, are especially likely to be encouraged to undergo postmastectomy radiation therapy. The indications for adjuvant radiation therapy have included four or more positive axillary lymph nodes, tumors 4 cm (or more) in diameter, and tumors at or near the margin of resection. More recently, some centers are recommending adjuvant radiation therapy for patients with as few as one positive lymph node or even in situ carcinoma close to the resection margin. The use of latissimus dorsi flaps after radiation has proven to be an excellent solution to postradiation tissue contracture, which can occur during breast expander reconstruction. The use of the latissimus flap electively with skin-sparing mastectomy preradiation is probably unwise, unless postmastectomy radiation is unlikely. Skin-sparing mastectomy with a latissimus flap thus should be preserved for patients unlikely to undergo adjuvant radiation therapy. Purely autologous reconstruction such as a TRAM flap is another option for these patients, either before or after radiation therapy.     

Autologous breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap

The extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap can provide autogenous tissue replacement of breast volume without an implant. Nevertheless, experience with the extended latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction is relatively limited. In this study, the authors evaluated their experience with the extended latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction to better understand its indications, limitations, complications, and clinical outcomes. All patients who underwent breast reconstruction with extended latissimus dorsi flaps at the authors' institution between January of 1990 and December of 2000 were reviewed. During the study period, 75 extended latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstructions were performed in 67 patients. Bilateral breast reconstructions were performed in eight patients, and 59 patients underwent unilateral breast reconstruction. There were 45 immediate and 30 delayed reconstructions. Mean patient age was 51.5 years. Mean body mass index was 31.8 kg/m2. Flap complications developed in 21 of 75 flaps (28.0 percent), and donor-site complications developed in 29 of 75 donor sites (38.7 percent). Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (17.3 percent) and donor-site seroma (25.3 percent) were found to be the most common complications. There were no flap losses. Patients aged 65 years or older had higher odds of developing flap complications compared with those 45 years or younger (p = 0.03). Patients with size D reconstructed breasts had significantly higher odds of flap complications compared with those with size A or B reconstructed breasts (p = 0.05). Obesity (body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2) was associated with a 2.15-fold increase in the odds of developing donor-site complications compared with patients with a body mass index less than 30 kg/m2 (p = 0.01). No other studied factors had a significant relationship with flap or donor-site complications. In most patients, the extended latissimus dorsi flap alone, without an implant, can provide good to excellent autologous reconstruction of small to medium sized breasts. In selected patients, larger breasts may be reconstructed with the extended latissimus dorsi flap alone. This flap's main disadvantage is donor-site morbidity with prolonged drainage and risk of seroma. Patients who are obese are at higher risk of developing these donor-site complications. In conclusion, the extended latissimus dorsi flap is a reliable method for total autologous breast reconstruction in most patients and should be considered more often as a primary choice for breast reconstruction.     

Intraarterial chemotherapy: the effects on free-tissue transfer

Multimodal therapy including intraarterial chemotherapy is recognized as state-of-the art therapy for soft-tissue cancer. Multimodal therapy often involves regional limb perfusion followed by sarcoma surgery with reconstruction of the resulting defect. This study was performed in an effort to evaluate the potential of free flap reconstruction after intraarterial therapy. A retrospective chart review of 52 patients who had undergone limb perfusion between 1988 and 1998 at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Bochum, Germany, identified 16 patients who had undergone intraarterial limb perfusion that was then followed by surgical resection and free flap reconstruction. There were seven women and nine men, with an average age of 37.9 years. All sixteen patients had received preoperative adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Reconstruction of the lower extremity was performed most commonly with rectus abdominis and latissimus dorsi free flaps. All vessels used for donor recipient anastomosis had been previously perfused. A vein graft was used in one case. Split-thickness skin grafting over the free flaps was used in four cases. The average length of hospitalization was 21.75 days, with an average follow-up of 20 months. No flap loss or infection was observed. Two flaps demonstrated partial edge necrosis. Three patients developed partial split-thickness skin graft loss and one developed a seroma that required no treatment. A draining sinus tract required resection in one patient. The overall flap success rate was 100 percent, with no flap failures. The overall surgical outcome was considered to be good in 12 patients on the basis of improved function and ambulation, and fair in four who had limitations in function and/or ambulation on the basis of both the patient self-evaluation and the physical therapy evaluation. Seven patients had recurrence of their disease. The overall mean survival time after surgery was 20.6 months. Currently, 10 patients are alive and six have died from their disease. The results of this study indicate that preoperative intraarterial chemotherapy does not significantly increase the risk of immediate free flap complications. Although our numbers are small, we believe that there is no clinical evidence justifying hesitation or refusal of free flap reconstruction after limb perfusion and intraarterial chemotherapy. Routine care in vessel selection and microsurgical technique should be performed to maximize favorable outcomes. Vessels should be inspected for their suitability before undertaking any free flap reconstruction.     

An approach to the repair of partial mastectomy defects

In many cases, breast deformity caused by partial mastectomy can be reduced or corrected by plastic surgery. Partial breast reconstruction is best performed immediately after the partial mastectomy using an approach determined by the size of the breast and the defect. Small defects in large breasts usually need no reconstruction. For larger defects in large breasts, breast reshaping (similar to reduction mammaplasty) combined with a contralateral breast reduction is usually the best option. For medium-sized or smaller breasts with small to moderate-sized defects, local flaps from the subaxillary region are very useful. If the defect is too large for correction with local tissue, a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap is usually the best choice. Using these techniques, patients can achieve aesthetically better outcomes from breast-conservation therapy, even when larger tumors are being treated or when wider margins are taken to reduce the risk of tumor recurrence. By working together with an oncologic surgeon and facilitating the removal of larger tumors, the plastic surgeon can widen the indications for both breast-conservation therapy and breast reconstruction at the same time.     

Breast reconstruction by superior gluteal microvascular free flaps without silicone implants

The author's experience with 10 gluteus maximus myodermal free flap breast reconstructions is reviewed against the current methods of reconstruction using silicone implants, latissimus dorsi flaps, regional skin flaps, and rectus abdominis myodermal flaps. The superior gluteal free flap can achieve a reliable, permanent, and aesthetic reconstruction of the breast without silicone implants. The softness, projection, natural appearance, and patient satisfaction are excellent compared with other methods. It is particularly useful in patients who object to the use of artificial implants, are not suitable for regional flaps, or have disappointing results from previous reconstructions. Technical modifications of the flap design and selection of the recipient vessels are important.     

Immediate free TRAM reconstruction in lumpectomy and radiation failure patients

Local recurrence after lumpectomy and radiation therapy indicates failed breast conservation surgery. These patients often proceed to mastectomy and are candidates for autogenous breast reconstruction. Free transverse rectus abdominus muscle (TRAM) reconstruction in these patients is complicated by repeated axillary dissection and the use of irradiated tissue. Complication rates for pedicled TRAMs have been reported at 33 percent when used in irradiated tissue beds. We report our results using the free TRAM for breast reconstruction after lumpectomy and radiation failure. All patients within this study developed a local recurrence after lumpectomy and radiation therapy. All patients had undergone axillary dissection for staging at the time of their lumpectomy. Patient records were reviewed for patient age, total radiation dose, associated risk factors for TRAM failure, operative time, donor vessels used for anastomosis, status of the native thoracodorsal vessels at the time of surgery, and postoperative complications. Over a 7-year period, 16 TRAM patients had undergone previous breast conservation surgery. Of these 16 patients, 14 underwent reconstruction with a planned free TRAM after simple mastectomy. Average operating room time was 7 hours. There were no partial or total flap losses. Complications were seen in 14 percent of the overall group. Overall, we found that the free TRAM provided an excellent aesthetic result with a lower complication rate than previously reported for pedicled TRAM flaps in irradiated beds. The thoracodorsal vessels provided an adequate donor vessel in 93 percent of the cases. The free TRAM provides a superior alternative in immediate reconstruction in patients who have failed breast conservative surgery.     

Breast reconstruction in older women: advantages of autogenous tissue

As the population ages, the treatment of breast cancer among elderly women is becoming increasingly common. Decisions with regard to breast reconstruction require not only consideration of patient age and comorbidities but also a need to balance life expectancy with quality of life. Although it is often assumed that implant-based breast reconstruction is the least disruptive method, especially among patients who may be facing limited survival times, it was hypothesized that autogenous tissue breast reconstruction is a well-tolerated and perhaps preferable means of reconstruction for older women who choose to undergo reconstruction following mastectomy. No large series of autogenous tissue reconstructions in this age group has been presented. A retrospective study of 84 postmastectomy reconstructions (66 unilateral and 18 bilateral; 78.6 percent immediate) performed at the authors' institution for 81 women 65 years of age or older, between April of 1987 and December of 2000, was undertaken. Reconstructions were implant-based ( = 26), latissimus dorsi flap-based ( = 24), or transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap-based ( = 34). Of the 34 TRAM flaps, 21 were free or supercharged. Breast complications were more frequent ( < 0.05) among recipients of implant-based reconstructions (76.9 percent) than among recipients of latissimus dorsi flap (41.7 percent) or TRAM flap (35.3 percent) reconstructions. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, comorbidities, smoking, radiotherapy, and body mass index had no effect. Medical complications without long-term sequelae were observed for two patients who underwent latissimus dorsi flap reconstructions and two patients who underwent free TRAM flap reconstructions; the difference in the rates of medical complications was not significant. At the mean follow-up time of 4.2 years, 92.8 percent of all study patients exhibited no evidence of disease. Notably, despite being free of disease, seven of the 26 patients (27 percent) who underwent implant-based reconstructions abandoned further reconstructive efforts after complications necessitated implant removal. It was concluded that age alone should not determine the type of breast reconstruction and that autogenous tissue breast reconstruction can be a safe successful alternative for women 65 years of age or older.     

The coincidence of TRAM flaps and prostheses in the setting of breast reconstruction

It is well known that transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps can be used to replace unsatisfactory prosthetic breast reconstructions; however, little has been written about the scope of breast implant use in TRAM flap patients. In this study, to ascertain the range of such therapeutic options, their frequency, and their clinical outcomes, the authors retrospectively reviewed the senior author's breast reconstruction experience from 1989 to 2000 with patients in whom both a TRAM flap and an implant were used for breast reconstruction. The authors examined the surgical indications, body habitus, bra size, chest wall irradiation history, flap type, implant type, complications, and outcomes for those patients with TRAM flap and breast implant combinations.Thirty-two women who had 50 (various) combinations of a TRAM flap and a breast implant were identified. There were more clinical scenarios than patients because many of the women had multiple scenarios. The 50 combination scenarios were then divided into six groups. Group I consisted of 14 patients who had elective prostheses placed beneath simultaneous TRAM flaps; group II consisted of 10 patients who had TRAM flaps with contralateral prosthetic reconstruction (in which two implants were received before the TRAM flaps, five implants were received simultaneously with the TRAM flaps, and three implants were received after the TRAM flaps); group III consisted of eight patients who had contralateral augmentation in addition to their TRAM flaps; group IV consisted of 11 patients who had TRAM flaps that were used to cover or replace previous prosthetic reconstructions; group V consisted of four patients in whom prostheses were used to augment or improve previous TRAM flap reconstructions; and group VI consisted of three patients who required prostheses to either reconstruct or salvage total or near-total TRAM flap failures. A broad range of implant types was used, although anatomic saline implants predominated. Forty-one percent of the patients in the review had undergone irradiation during the course of their treatment for breast cancer. Eight of the 32 patients experienced a total of twelve complications, four of which were related to the implants and eight of which involved the TRAM flaps and abdominal donor sites.Although complex, the wide variety of potential TRAM flap/breast implant combinations can be useful for patients with challenging reconstructive scenarios, particularly those that involve radiation therapy. In the group of patients reviewed by the authors, TRAM flaps were most often used in successful partnership either on the same side as or opposite to an implant reconstruction. A TRAM flap was used to salvage or replace an unsatisfactory implant reconstruction in less than a third of the patients. From a risk point of view, implants used opposite a TRAM flap reconstruction had a lower incidence of complication than did implants used beneath TRAM flaps.     

Delay in unipedicled TRAM flap reconstruction of the breast: a review of 76 consecutive cases

Since its introduction in 1982, the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap has become the standard therapy in autogenous breast reconstruction. A lower rate of partial flap (fat) necrosis is associated with microvascular free-flap transfer compared with the conventional (unipedicled) TRAM flap because of its potentially improved blood supply. A TRAM flap delay before flap transfer has been advocated, especially in a high-risk patient population (obesity, history of cigarette smoking, radiation therapy, or abdominal scar). The authors reviewed a series of 76 consecutive delayed unipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions during a 5-year period. Data were analyzed with respect to type of procedure and time of delay, overall outcome, general surgical complications, flap-related (specific) complications (partial or complete flap loss), and patient satisfaction. Seventy-six unilateral breast reconstructions using the unipedicled TRAM flap were performed between 1995 and 2000 in 76 patients (mean age, 47.4 years). Fifty-four flaps were performed as immediate reconstructions, and 22 as secondary procedures. Seventy-two flaps were based on the contralateral pedicle, and four flaps were based on an ipsilateral pedicle. In all cases, a flap delay consisted of ligature of both deep inferior epigastric arteries and veins, accessed from an inferior flap incision down to the fascia, with a mean of 13.9 days before the flap transfer. No acute flap take-back procedure had to be performed. There was no complete flap loss, and breast reconstruction was achieved in all cases. In five cases (6.6 percent), a partial (fat) flap necrosis occurred. Interestingly, the majority of these cases (four of five) were secondary breast reconstructions. In addition, of the five patients who had partial flap necrosis, four had a history of smoking, two received radiation therapy, three received chemotherapy, and three patients were obese (body mass index greater than or equal to 30) or overweight (body mass index greater than or equal to 25). In three cases, an early surgical complication (two wound infections at the flap interface and one at the donor site) occurred. One patient developed a deep vein thrombosis. Five patients developed secondary ventral hernias necessitating repair (6.6 percent). Forty-one patients underwent secondary nipple-areola reconstruction. In 19 patients of this group, a secondary procedure (e.g., scar revision, limited liposuction, and/or excision of contour deformities) was simultaneously performed. A survey of patient satisfaction was performed using a modified SF-36 questionnaire. Fifty-one patients participated (67 percent). The overall satisfaction was very high and 51 patients reported that they would recommend the procedure to others (100 percent). Multiple factors such as patient selection, surgical expertise, and preoperative and postoperative management contribute to the success of any type of autogenous breast reconstruction. However, rare partial and absent complete flap necrosis in the authors' series may be attributable to the flap delay. A low morbidity rate and short hospital stay may become increasingly relevant, with limited structural and financial resources in the future. Therefore, the delayed unipedicled TRAM flap should be regarded as a valuable option in attempted breast reconstruction using autogenous tissue in both a high-risk and the general patient population.     

Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps

Breast reconstruction using the lower abdominal free superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap has the potential to virtually eliminate abdominal donor-site morbidity because the rectus abdominis fascia and muscle are not incised or excised. However, despite its advantages, the free SIEA flap for breast reconstruction is rarely used. A prospective study was conducted of the reliability and outcomes of the use of SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction compared with transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Breast reconstruction with an SIEA flap was attempted in 47 consecutive free autologous tissue breast reconstructions between August of 2001 and November of 2002. The average patient age was 49 years, and the average body mass index was 27 kg/m. The SIEA flap was used in 14 (30 percent) of these breast reconstructions in 12 patients. An SIEA flap was not used in the remaining 33 cases because the SIEA was absent or was deemed too small. The mean superficial inferior epigastric vessel pedicle length was approximately 7 cm. The internal mammary vessels were used as recipients in all SIEA flap cases so that the flap could be positioned sufficiently medially on the chest wall. The average hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with SIEA flaps than it was for those who underwent reconstruction with TRAM or DIEP flaps. Of the 47 free flaps, one SIEA flap was lost because of arterial thrombosis. Medium-size and large breasts were reconstructed with hemi-lower abdominal SIEA flaps, with aesthetic results similar to those obtained with TRAM and DIEP flaps. The free SIEA flap is an attractive option for autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Harvest of this flap does not injure the anterior rectus fascia or underlying rectus abdominis muscle. This can potentially eliminate abdominal donor-site complications such as bulge and hernia formation, and decrease weakness, discomfort, and hospital stay compared with TRAM and DIEP flaps. The disadvantages of an SIEA flap are a smaller pedicle diameter and shorter pedicle length than TRAM and DIEP flaps and the absence or inadequacy of an arterial pedicle in most patients. Nevertheless, in selected patients, the SIEA flap offers advantages over the TRAM and DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.     

Donor site sequelae after autologous breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi flap

The indications for autologous reconstruction are increasing. The standard procedure is the transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap; however, this flap has contraindications and drawbacks. The latissimus dorsi muscle flap is simple and reliable. Hokin et al. demonstrated in 1983 that this flap can be extended and used for breast reconstruction without an implant. Since then, it has been widely studied in this setting and is known to provide good aesthetic results. Dorsal sequelae, conversely, were not appraised. The aim of this study was to assess objective and subjective dorsal sequelae after the harvest of an extended flap. Forty-three consecutive patients who had had breast reconstruction with an autologous latissimus dorsi flap were assessed by a surgeon and a physiotherapist for muscular strength and shoulder mobility. Patient opinion was studied through a questionnaire. Mean delay between the operation and the evaluation was 19 months. Early complications, mainly dorsal seromas, were frequent after the harvest of an extended flap (72 percent). There was no late morbidity and, especially, no flap loss or partial necrosis. As for functional results, 37 percent of the patients had complete adjustment and 70 to 87 percent demonstrated no change in shoulder strength. Sixty percent of the patients experienced no limitation in everyday life, and 90 percent said they would undergo this procedure again. The authors show that dorsal sequelae after an extended latissimus dorsi flap are minimal and that this technique compares favorably with the transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap.