Therapy for Cancer of the Breast: Current Status of Steroid Hormone Receptors

Estrogen receptor (ER) assays in human breast cancer tissue have proved useful in selecting patients for endocrine therapies. The absence of ER indicates hormone independent tumors and precludes the use of endocrine therapy. Patients with positive tumor ER respond to endocrine therapy at nearly twice the rate of those patients chosen by clinical criteria, although about a third of ER positive tumors in patients still do not respond. Recently, research has been directed toward increasing the accuracy of the ER assay in the ER positive group. The absolute tumor ER value and the presence of progesterone receptor appear promising in this regard. The significance of nuclear estrogen receptor is being studied. Finally, the ER status of a primary breast tumor appears to be a marker for the length of time until recurrence after mastectomy, and for survival. The ER assay may prove valuable in planning new adjuvants in the treatment of breast cancer.     

Aromatase inhibitors: future directions

Estrogen and its cognate estrogen receptor are key players in the etiology and progression of breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors, suppressing tumor and plasma estrogen levels by blocking testosterone conversion to estrogen, have been proven to provide the most effective endocrine therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Aromatase inhibitors are now the first choice endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting for postmenopausal women. These endocrine agents also seem likely to soon become the standard adjuvant therapy, either alone or in sequence with tamoxifen, though their long-term toxicity and the optimum duration of therapy still remain to be defined. Advanced experimental studies and some clinical observations reveal the importance of blocking both the genomic and non-genomic activities of the estrogen receptor, as well as its crosstalk with growth factor and other cellular signaling, for greatest effectiveness of endocrine therapy. Consequently, these studies provide a mechanistic explanation for the superb performance of aromatase inhibitors, and also suggest how inhibiting selected growth factor receptors might delay or prevent the onset of resistance to aromatase inhibitors and other endocrine therapies.     

Estradiol receptor levels in human breast carcinomas.

The presence or absence of a specific estradiol-binding protein receptor in the cytoplasm of primary and secondary tumour cells has been used by physicians as an important guide in deciding whether to use hormonal therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer. This report gives the levels of estradiol receptors in the cytosol of 228 primary and secondary breast tumours, measured by a sensitive multiple-point assay in which dextran-coated charcoal separated bound form unbound estrogen. The data were analysed with a Scatchard plot. Of the 175 primary and 53 secondary tumours 53% and 32% respectively gave positive results. The mean receptor level in the primary tumours was significantly higher among older patients and increased with age. With metastatic lesions positive results were more common in lymph node samples tha in skin nodule samples.     

Presurgical (neoadjuvant) endocrine therapy is a useful model to predict response and outcome to endocrine treatment in breast cancer patients

Endocrine therapy of breast cancer has been improved continuously during the last decades. Currently, aromatase inhibitors are dominating treatment algorithms for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer while tamoxifen still is the most widely used drug for premenopausal women. Several research tools and study designs have been used to challenge established drugs and develop the field of antihormonal therapy. One pivotal study option has been the observation of clinical responses during presurgical/neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (PSET/NET). This strategy has several major advantages. First, the breast tumor, still present in the patient's breast during therapy, can be followed by clinical observations and radiological measurements and any treatment effect will be immediately registered. Second, tumor biopsies may be obtained before initiation and following therapy allowing intra-patient comparisons. These tumor-biopsies may be used for the evaluation of intra-tumor changes associated with drug treatment. As examples, presurgical breast cancer trials have been used to evaluate intra-tumor estrogen levels during therapy with aromatase inhibitors and also to study mechanisms involved in the adaptation processes to estrogen suppression. Biomarker studies have provided information that may be used for patient selection in the future. Finally, recently published results from presurgical trials testing combinations of classical endocrine drugs and novel targeted therapies have produced promising results.     

Managing Bone Health in Breast Cancer

ObjectiveOsteoporosis is a common condition that can be caused or exacerbated by estrogen deficiency.MethodsThis narrative review will discuss optimizing bone health in the setting of adjuvant endocrine treatments for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer and the current use of antiresorptive agents as adjuvant therapy and as bone modifying agents.ResultsAdjuvant endocrine treatments for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer (tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors) affect bone health. The exact effect depends on the agent used and the menopausal state of the woman. Antiresorptive medications for osteoporosis, bisphosphonates and denosumab, lower the risk of bone loss from aromatase inhibitors. Use of bisphosphonates as adjuvant treatment in breast cancer, regardless of hormone receptor status, is increasing because of benefits seen to cancer relapse and survival.ConclusionOptimizing bone health in women with breast cancer during and after cancer treatment is informed by an understanding of breast cancer treatment and its skeletal effect.     

Summary of aromatase inhibitor trials: the past and future

Antagonizing estrogen by inhibition of aromatase has become a mainstay of adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with hormone receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. Recent trials have shown an incremental gain for the AIs over tamoxifen when given as an up-front alternative to tamoxifen, but additionally added benefit is achieved by giving them in sequence with tamoxifen after either an early switch (2–3 years) or as a late switch (5 years). The true clinical implications of accelerated bone resorption from AIs is becoming better understood and its management defined. AI minimally effect quality of life. The chronic relapsing nature of ER+ breast cancer implies long term therapy will be of benefit in selected patients. Outstanding issues under investigation include optimal duration of endocrine therapy, optimal sequence, optimal agents and whether combining anti-estrogens will yield advantage. The role of AIs is also under investigation in premenopausal women in combination with ovarian function suppression. Identifying prognostic and predictive factors of endocrine therapy is important as is the identification and overcoming of resistance mechanisms. Both tumor and host signatures are being pursued to this end. Optimizing, expanding and extending endocrine therapy is likely to add further to patient outcome.     

Determination of nuclear DNA content and hormone receptors in breast cancer by the CAS 100 cell analysis system as related to morphologic grade and biochemical results

Quantitative DNA analysis by the CAS 100 Cell Analysis System was performed on 120 cases of primary breast carcinoma using touch preparations from fresh biopsy specimens in 110 cases and archival, restrained fine needle preparations in 10 cases. Fifteen cases of metastatic breast carcinoma and 15 cases of benign breast lesions were also analyzed. Overall, 76.7% of the carcinomas examined were aneuploid, with most DNA indices between 1.6 and 2.0. DNA anomalies were strongly related to nuclear atypia but not to structural differentiation. The hormone receptor content, when compared with DNA data and morphologic features, emerged as a biologically independent factor. Agreement between quantitative immunocytochemical assay (QICA) using the CAS system and traditional dextran-coated charcoal assay (DCCA) in discriminating positive and negative status for estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors was 86% and 82%, respectively. Marked variations, however, occurred in the numerical values. Considering the advantages of QICA and the importance of tumor heterogeneity in particular, the use of traditional DCCA as the reference technique and only guide for therapy no longer seems justified.     

Phase II clinical study of toremifene in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Preliminary communication

Twelve postmenopausal women with inoperable or metastatic breast cancer were given toremifene at a daily dose of 60 mg. The patients had no prior endocrine or cytotoxic therapy and further inclusion criteria were bidimensionally measurable disease, performance status above 50, expected survival of more than 3 months and estrogen receptor status positive or undetermined. Objective response [complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR)] was achieved in 6 patients (50%) and stable disease was obtained in 5 patients. No side effects of the treatment were noted.     

Importance of PI3-kinase pathway in response/resistance to aromatase inhibitors

Endocrine therapy has been the most effective treatment modality for hormone receptor positive breast cancer. However, its efficacy has been limited by either de novo or acquired resistance. Recent data indicates that activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling is associated with the poor outcome luminal B subtype of breast cancer and accompanied by the development of endocrine therapy resistance. Importantly, inhibition of PI3K pathway signaling in endocrine resistant breast cancer cell lines reduces cell survival and improves treatment response to endocrine agents. Interestingly, mutations in PIK3CA, the alpha catalytic subunit of the class IA PI3K, which renders cells dependent on PI3K pathway signaling, is the most common genetic abnormality identified in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. The synthetic lethality observed between estrogen deprivation and PI3K pathway inhibition in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer cell lines provides further scientific rational to target both estrogen receptor and the PI3K pathway in order to improve the outcome of ER+ breast cancer.     

Chemoprevention with aromatase inhibitors--trial strategies

Estrogen and its catechol metabolites from both the circulation and synthesized within the breast are important in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Blocking estrogen's effects on the breast with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMS) is an ongoing strategy. Thus, tamoxifen and raloxifene reduce risk as monotherapy. Aromatase (estrogen synthetase) inhibitors are a logical alternative to SERMS. To date, SERMS have demonstrated reduction only in estrogen–progesterone receptor positive cancers without reduction in receptor negative tumors. By inhibiting the parent estrogens and their catechol metabolites, true prevention of cancer initiation might occur and reduction not only in the receptor positive but also negative tumors might result. Ongoing adjuvant breast cancer trials are exploring aromatase inhibitors as alternatives to tamoxifen, or in sequence or in combination with tamoxifen. Relative efficacies including reduction in contralateral breast cancer, toxicities and end-organ effects and impact on quality of life, are being explored. Data from these trials will help to guide future chemoprevention strategies. Proof of principal trials in ‘high risk’ cohorts such as premalignant breast lesions, dense screening mammograms, high plasma estradiol levels or increased bone density are already ongoing. Issues such as dose, schedule, therapeutic index and mono versus combination therapy are important to define.     

Pathologic progression of mammary carcinomas in a C3(1)/SV40 T/t-antigen transgenic rat model of human triple-negative and Her2-positive breast cancer

The C3(1) component of the rat prostate steroid binding protein has been used to target expression of the SV40 T/t-antigen to the mammary epithelium of mice resulting in pre-neoplastic lesions that progress to invasive and metastatic cancer with molecular features of human basal-type breast cancer. However, there are major differences in the histologic architecture of the stromal and epithelial elements between the mouse and human mammary glands. The rat mammary gland is more enriched with epithelial and stromal components than the mouse and more closely resembles the cellular composition of the human gland. Additionally, existing rat models of mammary cancer are typically estrogen receptor positive and hormone responsive, unlike most genetically engineered mouse mammary cancer models. In an attempt to develop a mammary cancer model that might more closely resemble the pathology of human breast cancer, we generated a novel C3(1)/SV40 T/t-antigen transgenic rat model that developed progressive mammary lesions leading to highly invasive adenocarcinomas. However, aggressive tumor development prevented the establishment of transgenic lines. Characterization of the tumors revealed that they were primarily estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negative, and either her2/neu positive or negative, resembling human triple-negative or Her2 positive breast cancer. Tumors expressed the basal marker K14, as well as the luminal marker K18, and were negative for smooth muscle actin. The triple negative phenotype has not been previously reported in a rat mammary cancer model. Further development of a C3(1)SV40 T/t-antigen based model could establish valuable transgenic rat lines that develop basal-type mammary tumors.     

Clinical breast cancer, new developments in selection and endocrine treatment of patients.

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor among women, comprising an estimated 24% of all cancer cases and 18% of all cancer deaths. At least half of the patients with primary breast cancer will ultimately die by metastatic disease. The tumor characteristics, the natural course of the disease and the response to therapy vary strongly. A number of recently detected cell biological parameters such as oncogenes/suppressor genes, growth factors and secretory proteins are more or less important prognostic factors, because they influence the characteristics and behavior of a tumor with respect to metastatic pattern, extent of cellular differentiation, growth rate and response to treatment. However, there is no clear consensus how best to identify patients at high or low risk. In our experience c-myc amplification and pS2 protein are strong prognosticators for relapse rate, while in advanced disease (apart from a negative estrogen/progesterone receptor/pS2 status) amplification of HER2/neu is a good prognosticator for failure to endocrine therapy. In the diagnosis of breast cancer, in vivo imaging of tumors by labeled hormones or other factors also forms a new development which might have implications for treatment too. With respect to treatment both endocrine and chemotherapy can cure a minority of patients with micrometastases, but in patients with advanced disease only a prolongation of (progression-free) survival can be reached. Response rates decrease with increasing tumor load. In the past decade a number of interesting new endocrine agents has been developed such as new (pure) (anti)steroidal agents, vitamins, aromatase inhibitors, analogs of peptide hormones, prolactin inhibitors and growth factor antagonists. However, less is known on the (potential) interaction between hormones, chemotherapeutic agents, retinoids, cytokins, growth factor antagonists and irradiation. Rapid detection of new powerful combination therapies are needed to improve treatment results during the nineties.     

Immune-deficient animals to study "hormone-dependent" breast and endometrial cancer

Athymic (nu/nu) mice are T cell deficient and can accept xenografts of human tumor material. Hormone-dependent tumor growth can be demonstrated in ovariectomized athymic mice by estrogen administration. Estrogen receptor (ER) positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells implanted into the axillary mammary fat do not grow into palpable tumors unless sustained release preparations of estrogen are administered. The non-steroidal antiestrogen tamoxifen, though it exhibits estrogenic properties in the mouse, does not facilitate MCF-7 tumor growth (during short term, i.e. 8 weeks of therapy) and can prevent estradiol-stimulated growth. In contrast, ER negative MDA-MB-231 cells grow with or without estrogen administration and tamoxifen does not control tumor growth. These statements reflect current dogma concerning the value of athymic mice to confirm the hormone dependent growth of cancer cells in vivo. Our aim has been to define the limits of this dogma and to investigate the growth relationship of hormone-dependent and independent cells with their host environment. The potential endocrine or paracine effect of ER negative tumors on the growth of ER positive tumors was evaluated by transplantation on opposite sides of athymic mice or by the inoculation of different ratios of ER positive/negative cells (MCF-7:MDA-MB-231 9:1, 99:1, 999:1). MCF-7 cells could not be encouraged to grow by a rapidly growing MDA-MB-231 tumor on the opposite side of the animal. Similarly ER negative tumors grew out of the mixed tumor inoculates suggesting that ER positive tumors could not be encouraged to grow preferentially by the paracrine influences of ER negative cells. However, estrogen facilitates the growth of an ER positive tumor following inoculation of mixed cell populations. Antiestrogen treatment can blunt estrogen-stimulated growth but cannot control the growth of ER positive/negative containing tumors. ER positive endometrial tumors grow in response to estrogen treatment and some (EnCa101) have been shown to grow in response to tamoxifen or a combination of tamoxifen and estrogen. More unusual though is our recent observation that an ER negative primary endometrial tumor (BR) and its metastasis (BR-MET) grow more rapidly in estrogen-treated athymic mice. This finding seems to have far-ranging consequences for our view of hormone-dependent growth. Either our view of estrogen-stimulated growth needs to be modified or the host is specifically altered during estrogen treatment. We have taken the position that since natural killer cells (present in athymic mice) can be lowered by estrogen this may result in an increased tumor cell survival in the heterotransplant model.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Aurora-A Mitotic Kinase Induces Endocrine Resistance through Down-Regulation of ERα Expression in Initially ERα+ Breast Cancer Cells

Development of endocrine resistance during tumor progression represents a major challenge in the management of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) positive breast tumors and is an area under intense investigation. Although the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood, many studies point towards the ‘cross-talk’ between ERα and MAPK signaling pathways as a key oncogenic axis responsible for the development of estrogen-independent growth of breast cancer cells that are initially ERα+ and hormone sensitive. In this study we employed a metastatic breast cancer xenograft model harboring constitutive activation of Raf-1 oncogenic signaling to investigate the mechanistic linkage between aberrant MAPK activity and development of endocrine resistance through abrogation of the ERα signaling axis. We demonstrate for the first time the causal role of the Aurora-A mitotic kinase in the development of endocrine resistance through activation of SMAD5 nuclear signaling and down-regulation of ERα expression in initially ERα+ breast cancer cells. This contribution is highly significant for the treatment of endocrine refractory breast carcinomas, because it may lead to the development of novel molecular therapies targeting the Aurora-A/SMAD5 oncogenic axis. We postulate such therapy to result in the selective eradication of endocrine resistant ERα^low/− cancer cells from the bulk tumor with consequent benefits for breast cancer patients.     

Variation of ER status between primary and metastatic breast cancer and relationship to p53 expression*.

OBJECTIVE: Estrogen-dependent growth of breast cancer can be blocked by anti-estrogens. Estrogen receptor (ER) presence in breast cancer implies responsiveness to endocrine therapy. However, for those patients who ultimately develop resistance to endocrine therapy, the mechanisms remain unclear. The present study attempted to compare the expression status of ER mRNA in a series of primary breast tumors with matched metastases and explored the relation between ER and mutant p53 expression. METHODS: In situ hybridization using a digoxigenin-labeled estrogen receptor cDNA probe was employed to determine the expression of ER mRNA in 52 cases of primary tumors and their matched axillary lymph node metastases. Immunohistochemical staining using a monoclonal antibody against ER was also performed. RESULTS: ER expression was observed in 53.8% (28/52) of primary tumors and 48% (25/52) of metastases, while 57.7% (30/52) of primary tumors and 53.8% (28/52) of metastases showed ER mRNA positivity. There were variations in ER status between in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry measurements and between primary tumors and metastases. Mutant p53 expression was inversely associated with ER-negative, high-grade tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In situ hybridization may be a more specific and sensitive method for determination of ER status than immunohistochemistry. It is possible that the biologic properties of ER change, and these changes may influence tumor response to endocrine therapy. In view of the ER variation, it was suggested that the ER status of metastatic tumors in addition to primary tumors should be taken into consideration in order to better determine the benefit of clinical endocrine therapy.     

Minireview: Inflammation: an instigator of more aggressive estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancers

Approximately 75% of breast tumors express the estrogen receptor (ER), and women with these tumors will receive endocrine therapy. Unfortunately, up to 50% of these patients will fail ER-targeted therapies due to either de novo or acquired resistance. ER-positive tumors can be classified based on gene expression profiles into Luminal A- and Luminal B-intrinsic subtypes, with distinctly different responses to endocrine therapy and overall patient outcome. However, the underlying biology causing this tumor heterogeneity has yet to become clear. This review will explore the role of inflammation as a risk factor in breast cancer as well as a player in the development of more aggressive, therapy-resistant ER-positive breast cancers. First, breast cancer risk factors, such as obesity and mammary gland involution after pregnancy, which can foster an inflammatory microenvironment within the breast, will be described. Second, inflammatory components of the tumor microenvironment, including tumor-associated macrophages and proinflammatory cytokines, which can act on nearby breast cancer cells and modulate tumor phenotype, will be explored. Finally, activation of the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) pathway and its cross talk with ER in the regulation of key genes in the promotion of more aggressive breast cancers will be reviewed. From these multiple lines of evidence, we propose that inflammation may promote more aggressive ER-positive tumors and that combination therapy targeting both inflammation and estrogen production or actions could benefit a significant portion of women whose ER-positive breast tumors fail to respond to endocrine therapy.