Targeting topoisomerase II with the chiral DNA-intercalating ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes

Many antitumor drugs act as topoisomerase inhibitors, and the inhibitions are usually related to DNA binding. Here we designed and synthesized DNA-intercalating Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes Δ--[Ru(bpy)₂(uip)]²⁺ and Λ-[Ru(bpy)₂(uip)]²⁺ (bpy is 2,2′-bipyridyl, uip is 2-(5-uracil)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline). The DNA binding, photocleavage, topoisomerase inhibition, and cytotoxicity of the complexes were studied. As we expected, the synthesized Ru(II) complexes can intercalate into DNA base pairs and cleave the pBR322 DNA with high activity upon irradiation. The mechanism studies reveal that singlet oxygen (¹O₂) and superoxide anion radical (O₂^•−) may play an important role in the photocleavage. The inhibition of topoisomerases I and II by the Ru(II) complexes has been studied. The results suggest that both complexes are efficient inhibitors towards topoisomerase II by interference with the DNA religation and direct topoisomerase II binding. Both complexes show antitumor activity towards HELA, hepG2, BEL-7402, and CNE-1 tumor cells. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Luminescent α-diimine complexes of ruthenium(II) containing scorpionate ligands

We describe the synthesis, characterization, and reactivity of several Ru(II) complexes of the type cis-L₂Ru(Z)ⁿ⁺, where L is an α-diimine [e.g. 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy) or 1,10-phenanthroline (phen)] ligand and Z is a bis-coordinated scorpionate ligand such as tris-(1-pyrazolyl)methane (HC(pz)₃, PZ=1-pyrazolyl; n=2) or tetrakis-(1-pyrazolyl)borate anion (B(pz)₄ ⁻; n=1). The complexes each exhibit strong visible absorption assigned as a π*(L)←dπ(Ru) metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) transition characteristic of the cis-L₂Ru²⁺ kernel. A corresponding MLCT excited state emission is observed in room temperature CH₃CN solution, although emission energies, lifetimes, and quantum yields are reduced relative to Ru(bpy)₃ ²⁺. Electronic spectra and cyclic voltammetry measurements indicate that the relative π-acceptor abilities of the coordinated Z are: Z=(1H-pyrazolyl)₂(pz)₂B(pz)₂<(pyridine)₂<(pz)₂CH(pz). Uncoordinated pz groups of cis-(bpy)₂Ru(pz)₂B(pz)₂ ⁺ can be reacted to form a sterically hindered, localized-valence (K_com33 l mol⁻¹) cis,cis-(bpy)₂Ru^II(pz)₂B(pz)₂Ru^II(bpy)₂ ³⁺ dimer. The dimer properties are interpreted by comparison to the known cis-(bpy)₂Ru^II(pz)₂Ru^II(bpy)₂ ²⁺ analog. The dimer is photoreactive and undergoes an asymmetrical photocleavage in CH₃CN (yielding cis-(bpy)₂Ru^III(pz)₂B(pz)₂ ²⁺ and cis-(bpy)₂Ru^II(CH₃CN)₂ ²⁺), similar to the corresponding thermal reaction observed for the mixed-valence cis-(bpy)₂Ru^II(pz)₂Ru^III(bpy)₂ ³⁺ system.     

Electronic Effect of Substituents on the DNA Intercalation of Ruthenium(II)?Polypyridyl Complexes

Five ruthenium(II) complexes, i.e., [Ru(bpy)₂(TIP)]²⁺ (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine; TIP=2‐thiophenimidazo[4,5‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline; 1 ), [Ru(bpy)₂(5‐NTIP)]²⁺ (5‐NTIP=2‐(5‐nitrothiophen)imidazo[4,5‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline; 2 ), [Ru(bpy)₂(5‐MOTIP)]²⁺ (5‐MOTIP=2‐(5‐methoxythiophen)imidazo[4,5‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline; 3 ), [Ru(bpy)₂(5‐BTIP)]²⁺ (5‐BTIP=2‐(5‐bromothiophen)imidazo[4,5‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline; 4 ), and [Ru(bpy)₂(4‐BTIP)]²⁺ (4‐BTIP=2‐(4‐bromothiophen)imidazo[4,5‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline; 5 ), were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis and UV/VIS, IR, and ¹H‐NMR spectroscopic methods. The photophysical and DNA‐binding properties were investigated by means of UV and fluorescence spectroscopic methods and viscosity measurements, respectively. The results suggest that all five complexes can bind to CT‐DNA with various binding strength. Complexes 2 and 3 showed the strongest and the weakest binding affinity, respectively, among these five complexes. Due to the substituent position of the Br‐atom in the ligand, complex 5 interacted stronger with CT‐DNA than complex 4 . The binding affinities of the complexes decreased in the order 2, 5, 4, 1 , and 3 .     

The Effects of Grafting of 2-Pyridyl to [Ru(bpy)2(Hpip)]2+ on Acid-Base and DNA-Binding Properties: Experimental and DFT Studies

Abstract

A new Ru(II) complex of [Ru(bpy)₂(Hppip)]²⁺ {bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine; Hppip = 2-(4-(pyridin- 2-yl)phenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline} has been synthesized by grafting of 2-pyridyl to parent complex [Ru(bpy)₂(Hpip)]²⁺ {Hppip = 2-(4-phenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f] [1,10]phenanthroline}. The acid-base properties of [Ru(bpy)₂(Hppip)]²⁺ studied by UV-visible and luminescence spectrophotometric pH titrations, revealed off-on-off luminescence switching of [Ru(bpy)₂(Hppip)]²⁺ that was driven by the protonation/deprotonation of the imidazolyl and the pyridyl moieties. The complex was demonstrated to be a DNA intercalator with an intrinsic DNA binding constant of (5.56 ± 0.2) × 10⁵ M^?1 in buffered 50 mM NaCl, as evidenced by UV-visible and luminescence titrations, reverse salt effect, DNA competitive binding with ethidium bromide, steady-state emission quenching by [Fe(CN)₆]^4-, DNA melting experiments and viscosity measurements. The density functional theory method was also used to calculate geometric/electronic structures of the complex in an effort to understand the DNA binding properties. All the studies indicated that the introduction of 2-pyridyl onto Hpip ligand is more favorable for extension of conjugate plane of the main ligand than that of phenyl, and for greatly enhanced ct-DNA binding affinity accordingly.     

Benzothiazole bipyridine complexes of ruthenium(II) with cytotoxic activity

A series of benzothiazole-substituted trisbipyridine ruthenium(II) analogues {[Ru(bpy)₂(4,5′-bbtb)]²⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(5,5′-bbtb)]²⁺ and [Ru(bpy)₂(5-mbtb)]²⁺ [bpy is 2,2′-bipyridine, bbtb is bis(benzothiazol-2-yl)-2,2′-bipyridine, 5-mbtb is 5-(benzothiazol-2-yl),5′-methyl-2,2′-bipyridine]} have been prepared and compared with the complex [Ru(bpy)₂(4,4′-bbtb)]²⁺ reported previously. From the UV–vis spectral studies, substitution at the 5-position of the bpy causes the ligand-centred transitions to occur at considerably lower energy than for those with the functionality at the 4-position, while at the same time causing the emission to be effectively quenched. However, substitution at the 4-position causes the metal-to-ligand charge transfer to occur at lower energies. Fluorescent intercalator displacement studies indicate that the doubly substituted complexes displace ethidium bromide from a range of oligonucleotides, with the greater preference shown for bulge and hairpin sequences by the Λ enantiomer. Since the complexes only show small variation in the UV–vis spectra on the introduction of calf thymus DNA and a small increase in fluorescence they do not appear to be intercalators, but appear to associate within one of the grooves. All of the reported bisbenzothiazole complexes show reasonable cytotoxicity against a range of human cancer cell lines. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

DNA-Binding and Photocleavage Properties of Ru(II) Polypyridyl Complexes with DNA and Their Toxicity Studies on Eukaryotic Microorganisms

Four Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes, [Ru(bpy)₂(7-NO₂-dppz)]²⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(7-CH₃-dppz)]²⁺, [Ru(phen)₂(7-NO₂-dppz)]²⁺, and [Ru(phen)₂(7-CH₃-dppz)]²⁺ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, phen = 1,10-phenanthroline), (7-Nitro-dppz = 7-Nitro dipyrido[3,2-a:2′-3′-c]phenazine, 7-CH₃-dppz = 7-Methyl dipyrido[3,2-a:2′-3′-c]phenazine), have been synthesized and characterized by IR, UV, elemental analysis, ¹H NMR, ¹³C-NMR, and mass spectroscopy. The DNA-binding properties of the four complexes were investigated by spectroscopic and viscosity measurements. The results suggest that all four complexes bind to DNA via an intercalative mode. Under irradiation at 365 nm, all four complexes were found to promote the photocleavage of plasmid pBR 322 DNA. Toxicological effects of the selected complexes were performed on industrially important yeasts (eukaryotic microorganisms).     

Selectivity at a three-base bulge site in the DNA binding of ΔΔ-[{Ru(phen)2}2(μ-dppm)]4+ [dppm is 4,6-bis(2-pyridyl)pyrimidine; phen is 1,10-phenanthroline]

The binding of the stereoisomers of [{Ru(phen)₂}₂(μ-bpm)]⁴⁺, [{Ru(phen)₂}₂(μ-dppm)]⁴⁺ and [{Ru(phen)₂}₂(μ-bb)]⁴⁺ {phen is 1,10-phenanthroline; bpm is 2,2′-bipyrimidine, dppm is 4,6-bis(2-pyridyl)pyrimidine, bb is 1,2-bis[4-(4′-methyl-2,2′-bipyridyl)]ethane} to an oligonucleotide duplex [d(GCATCGAAAGCTACG)•d(CGTAGCCGATGC)] containing a three-base bulge has been studied using a fluorescence intercalator displacement assay. Of the dinuclear ruthenium complexes, the dppm-linked species showed the strongest binding to the oligonucleotide, with the ΔΔ isomer binding slightly more strongly than the meso isomer and the ΛΛ isomer exhibiting the weakest binding. In order to determine whether the ΔΔ-[{Ru(phen)₂}₂(μ-dppm)]⁴⁺ metal complex specifically bound at the three-base bulge site, a ¹H NMR study of the binding of the metal complex to the oligonucleotide duplex d(GCATCGAAAGCTACG)•d(CGTAGCCGATGC) was carried out. Although a detailed picture of the metal complex–oligonucleotide association could not be determined from the NMR results owing to the broadening of the resonances from the metal complex and nucleotide residues at the bulge site, the NMR results do indicate that the metal complex specifically binds at the three-base bulge site. The combined results of this study suggest that the dppm-bridged dinuclear ruthenium complexes have considerable potential as probes for the unusual secondary structure obtained by the insertion of a three-base bulge within duplex DNA.     

The effects of structural variations of thiophene-containing Ru(II) complexes on the acid–base and DNA binding properties

A phenylthiophenyl-bearing Ru(II) complex of [Ru(bpy)₂(Hbptip)](PF₆)₂ {bpy?=?2,2′-bipyridine, Hbptip?=?2-(4-phenylthiophen-2-yl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline} was synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, ¹H NMR spectroscopy, and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. The ground- and excited-state acid–base properties of the complex were studied by UV–visible absorption and photoluminescence spectrophotometric pH titrations and the negative logarithm values of the ground-state acid ionization constants were derived to be pK _a1?=?1.31?±?0.09 and pK _a2?=?5.71?±?0.11 with the pK _a2 associated deprotonation/protonation process occurring over 3 pK _a units more acidic than thiophenyl-free parent complex of [Ru(bpy)₂(Hpip)]²⁺ {Hpip?=?2-phenyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline}. The calf thymus DNA-binding properties of [Ru(bpy)₂(Hbptip)]²⁺ in Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.1 and 50?mM NaCl) were investigated by DNA viscosities and density functional theoretical calculations as well as UV–visible and emission spectroscopy techniques of UV–visible and luminescence titrations, steady-state emission quenching by [Fe(CN)₆]^4?, DNA competitive binding with ethidium bromide, DNA melting experiments, and reverse salt effects. The complex was evidenced to bind to the DNA intercalatively with binding affinity being greater than those for previously reported analogs of [Ru(bpy)₂(Hip)]²⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(Htip)]²⁺, and [Ru(bpy)₂(Haptip)]²⁺ {Hip?=?1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline, Htip?=?2-thiophenimidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline, Haptip?=?2-(5-phenylthiophen-2-yl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline}.     

Chiral ruthenium(II) anthraquinone complexes as dual inhibitors of topoisomerases I and II

Abstract  

DNA topoisomerases (I and II) have been one of the excellent targets in anticancer drug development. Here two chiral ruthenium(II) anthraquinone complexes, Δ- and Λ-[Ru(bpy)₂(ipad)]²⁺, where bpy is 2,2′-bipyridine and ipad is 2-(anthracene-9,10-dione-2-yl)imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline, were synthesized and characterized. As expected, both of the Ru(II) complexes intercalate into DNA base pairs and possess an obviously greater affinity with DNA. Topoisomerase inhibition and DNA strand passage assay confirmed that the two complexes are efficient dual inhibitors of topoisomerases I and II by interference with the DNA religation. In MTT cytotoxicity studies, two Ru(II) complexes exhibited antitumor activity against HeLa, MCF-7, HepG2 and BEL-7402 tumor cell lines. Flow cytometry analysis shows an increase in the percentage of cells with apoptotic morphological features in the sub-G1 phase for Ru(II) complexes. Nuclear chromatin cleavage has also been observed from AO/EB staining assay and alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay). The results demonstrated that Δ- and Λ-[Ru(bpy)₂(ipad)]²⁺ act as dual inhibitors of topoisomerases I and II, and cause DNA damage that can lead to cell cycle arrest and/or cell death by apoptosis.     

Interaction of [Ru(bpy)2(dppz)] with human telomeric DNA: Preferential binding to G-quadruplexes over i-motif

Inspired by the enormous importance attributed to the structure and function of human telomeric DNA, we focus our attention on the interaction of [Ru(bpy)₂(dppz)]²⁺ with the guanine-rich single-strand oligomer 5′-AGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGG-3′ (22AG) and the complementary cytosine-rich strand (22CT). In Na⁺ buffer, 22AG may adopt an antiparallel basket quadruplex, whereas, it favours a mixed parallel/antiparallel structure in K⁺ buffer. 22CT may self-associate at acidic pH into an i-motif. In this paper, the interaction between [Ru(bpy)₂(dppz)]²⁺ and each unusual DNA was evaluated. It was interesting that [Ru(bpy)₂(dppz)]²⁺ could promote the human telomeric repeat 22AG to fold into intramolecular antiparallel G-quadruplex without any other cations. What's more, [Ru(bpy)₂(dppz)]²⁺ was found to have a strong preference for binding to G-quadruplexes that were induced through either Na⁺ or K⁺, while weak binding to i-motif was observed. The results also indicated that [Ru(bpy)₂(dppz)]²⁺ could serve as a prominent molecular “light switch” for both G-quadruplexes, revealing a potential application of the title complex in luminescent signaling of G-quadruplex DNA.     

Synthesis and characterisation of bis(2,2′-bipyridine)(4-carboxy-4′-(pyrid-2-ylmethylamido)-2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) di(hexafluorophosphate): Comparison of spectroelectrochemical properties with related complexes

The new complex, [Ru^II(bpy)₂(4-HCOO-4′-pyCH₂ NHCO-bpy)](PF₆)₂ · 3H₂O (1), where 4-HCOO-4′-pyCH₂NHCO-bpy is 4-(carboxylic acid)-4′-pyrid-2-ylmethylamido-2,2′-bipyridine, has been synthesised from [Ru(bpy)₂(H₂dcbpy)](PF₆)₂ (H₂dcbpy is 4,4′-(dicarboxylic acid)-2,2′-bipyridine) and characterised by elemental analysis and spectroscopic methods. An X-ray crystal structure determination of the trihydrate of the [Ru(bpy)₂(H₂dcbpy)](PF₆)₂ precursor is reported, since it represented a different solvate to an existing structure. The structure shows a distorted octahedral arrangement of the ligands around the ruthenium(II) centre and is consistent with the carboxyl groups being protonated. A comparative study of the electrochemical and photophysical properties of [Ru^II(bpy)₂(4-HCOO-4′-pyCH₂NHCO-bpy)]²⁺ (1), [Ru(bpy)₂(H₂dcbpy)]²⁺ (2), [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ (3), [Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂] (4) and [Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂]⁺ (5) was then undertaken to determine their variation upon changing the ligands occupying two of the six ruthenium(II) coordination sites. The ruthenium(II) complexes exhibit intense ligand centred (LC) transition bands in the UV region, and broad MLCT bands in the visible region. The ruthenium(III) complex, 5, displayed overlapping LC bands in the UV region and a LMCT band in the visible. 1, 2 and 3 were found, via cyclic voltammetry at a glassy carbon electrode, to exhibit very positive reversible formal potentials of 996, 992 and 893 mV (versus Fc/Fc⁺) respectively for the Ru(III)/Ru(II) half-cell reaction. As expected the reversible potential derived from oxidation of 4 (−77 mV (versus Fc/Fc⁺)) was in excellent agreement with that found via reduction of 5 (−84 mV (versus Fc/Fc⁺)). Spectroelectrochemical experiments in an optically transparent thin-layer electrochemical cell configuration allowed UV-Vis spectra of the Ru(III) redox state to be obtained for 1, 2, 3 and 4 and also confirmed that 5 was the product of oxidative bulk electrolysis of 4. These spectrochemical measurements also confirmed that the oxidation of all Ru(II) complexes and reduction of the corresponding Ru(III) complex are fully reversible in both the chemical and electrochemical senses.     

pH effects on optical and DNA binding properties of a thiophene-containing ruthenium(II) complex

A new ruthenium(II) complex, [Ru(bpy)₂(Htip)]Cl₂ {where bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine and Htip = 2-(thiophen-2-yl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline}, has been synthesized and characterized by ¹H NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and mass spectrometry. The pH effects on UV-Vis absorption and emission spectra of the complex have been studied, and the ground- and excited-state acidity ionization constant values have been derived. The calf thymus (ct) DNA binding properties of the complex have been investigated with UV-Vis absorption and luminescence titrations, steady-state emission quenching by [Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻, DNA competitive binding with ethidium bromide, DNA melting experiments, and viscosity measurements. The molecular structures and electronic properties of [Ru(bpy)₂(Htip)]²⁺ and deprotonated form [Ru(bpy)₂(tip)]⁺ have also been investigated by means of density functional theory calculations in an effort to understand the DNA binding properties. The results suggest that the complex undergo three-step successive protonation/deprotonation reactions with one of which occurring over physiological pH region, and act as a ct-DNA intercalator with an intrinsic DNA binding constant value on 10⁵ M⁻¹ order of magnitude that is insensitive to pH.     

The interesting DNA-binding properties of three novel dinuclear Ru(II) complexes with varied lengths of flexible bridges

Three binuclear Ru(II) complexes with two [Ru(bpy)₂(pip)]²⁺-based subunits {where bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine and pip = 2-phenylimidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline} being linked by varied lengths of flexible bridges, were synthesized and characterized by ¹H NMR, elemental analysis, UV-visible (UV-vis) and photoluminescence spectroscopy. The structures of the three complexes were optimized by density functional theory calculations. The interaction of the complexes with calf thymus DNA was investigated by UV-vis and luminescence titrations, steady-state emission quenching by [Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻, DNA competitive binding with ethidium bromide, DNA melting experiments, and viscosity measurements. The experimental results indicated that the three complexes bound to the DNA most probably in a threading intercalation binding mode with high DNA binding constant values three orders of magnitude greater than the DNA binding constant value reported for proven DNA intercalator, mononuclear counterpart [Ru(bpy)₂(p-mopip)]²⁺ {p-mopip = 2-(4-methoxylphenyl)imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline}.     

Synthesis, DNA-binding and photocleavage studies of ruthenium complexes [Ru(bpy)2(mitatp)] and [Ru(bpy)2(nitatp)]

Two new ruthenium complexes [Ru(bpy)₂(mitatp)](ClO₄)₂1 and [Ru(bpy)₂(nitatp)](ClO₄)₂2 (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, mitatp = 5-methoxy-isatino[1,2-b]-1,4,8,9-tetraazatriphenylene, nitatp = 5-nitro-isatino[1,2-b]-1,4,8,9-tetraazatriphenylene) have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, ¹H NMR, mass spectrometry and cyclic voltammetry. Spectroscopic and viscosity measurements proved that the two Ru(II) complexes intercalate DNA with larger binding constants than that of [Ru(bpy)₂(dppz)]²⁺ (dppz = dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine) and possess the excited lifetime of microsecond scale upon binding to DNA. Both complexes can efficiently photocleave pBR322 DNA in vitro under irradiation. Singlet oxygen (¹O₂) was proved to contribute to the DNA photocleavage process, the ¹O₂ quantum yields was determined to be 0.43 and 0.36 for 1 and 2, respectively. Moreover, a photoinduced electron transfer mechanism was also found to be involved in the DNA cleavage process.     

Syntheses, characterization and DNA binding of mono- and diruthenium(II) complexes containing 2,2′-bis(1,2,4-triazino[5,6-f]phenanthren-3-yl)-4,4′-bipyridine and 2,2′-bipyridine ligands

A novel bridging ligand 2,2′-bis(1,2,4-triazino[5,6-f]phenanthren-3-yl)-4,4′-bipyridine (btpb) and its mononuclear ruthenium(II) complex [Ru(bpy)₂(btpb)]²⁺ (Rubtpb; bpy = 2,2′-bipyridyl) and dinuclear ruthenium(II) complex [Ru(bpy)₂(btpb)Ru(bpy)₂]⁴⁺ (Ru₂btpb) have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analyses, fast atom bombardment or electrospray mass spectra, ¹H NMR, and electronic spectroscopy. Binding behaviors of the mono- and dinuclear complexes with calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) have been investigated by absorption spectra, viscosity measurements, and equilibrium dialysis experiments. As the concentration of DNA is increased, the electronic absorption spectra bands at the metal-ligand charge transfer of the mononuclear complex Rubtpb at 501.0 nm exhibit hypochromism of about 17.4% and bathochromism of 2.0 nm, the dinuclear complex Ru₂btpb at 511.0 nm exhibits hypochromism of about 24.8% and bathochromism of 1.0 nm. The increasing amounts of the complexes on the relative viscosities of CT-DNA are much smaller than that of the classic intercalators. The experiments suggest that the Rubtpb and Ru₂btpb may be bound to DNA by non-intercalating binder.     

DNA binding and bending by dinuclear complexes comprising ruthenium polypyridyl centres linked by a bis(pyridylimine) ligand

The interaction of enantiomerically pure dinuclear complexes of the form [Ru₂(L-L)₄L¹]⁴⁺ (where L-L = 2,2^′-bipyridine (bpy) or 1,10-phenanthroline (phen) and L¹ = bis(pyridylimine) ligand ((C₅H₄N)CN(C₆H₄))₂CH₂)) with ct-DNA have been investigated by absorbance, circular dichroism, fluorescence displacement assays, thermal analysis, linear dichroism and gel electrophoresis. The complexes all bind more strongly to DNA than ethidium bromide, stabilise DNA and have a significant bending effect on DNA. The data for Δ,Δ-[Ru₂(bpy)₄L¹]⁴⁺ are consistent with it binding to DNA outside the grooves wrapping the DNA about it. By way of contrast the other complexes are groove-binders. The phen complexes provide a chemically and enantiomerically stable alternative to the DNA-coiling di-iron triple-helical cylinder previously studied. In contrast to the di-iron helicates, the phen complexes show DNA sequence effects with Δ,Δ-[Ru₂(phen)₄L¹]⁴⁺ binding preferentially to GC and Λ,Λ-[Ru₂(phen)₄L¹]⁴⁺ to AT.     

Syntheses and characterization of Co(III) binuclear complexes with bis(catecholate) ligands containing an acetylene linker

Three binuclear Co(III) complexes with 5,5′-(buta-1,3-diyne-1,4-diyl)bis(3-tert-butylcatechol) (L1), 5,5′-(2,5-dimethoxy-1,4-phenylene)bis(ethyne-2,1-diyl)bis(3-tert-butyl-catechol) (L2) and 5,5′-(4,4′-(buta-1,3-diyne-1,4-diyl)bis(2,5-dimethoxy-4,1-phenylene))bis(ethyne-2,1-diyl)bis(3-tert-butyl-catechol) (L3) have been prepared. The triple bond-containing L1, L2 and L3 ligands were synthesized by a cross-coupling reaction. These complexes were characterized by elemental analyses, electrochemical measurements, ¹H NMR and UV-Vis spectra. In [Co₂(bpy)₄(L1)]²⁺, electrochemical oxidation of the complexes occurs at the bridges as two closely spaced one-electron couples. UV-Vis spectra reveal that chemical oxidation of [Co₂(bpy)₄(L1)]²⁺ using Ag⁺ occurs as a two-electron process forming [Co₂(bpy)₄(L1^Cat,SQ)]³⁺ or [Co₂(bpy)₄(L1^SQ,SQ)]⁴⁺. On the other hand, [Co₂(bpy)₄(L2)]²⁺ and [Co₂(bpy)₄(L3)]²⁺ exhibit different oxidation behavior under the same experimental conditions. In this report we discuss the role of the distance between the two metal atoms on the oxidative behavior of binuclear Co(III) complexes.     

Synthesis,Structure, DNA‐Binding Properties,and Cytotoxicity of Ruthenium(II) Polypyridyl Complexes

Many ruthenium(II) complexes show high antitumor activities, and the in vitro antitumor activities are usually related to DNA binding. We designed and synthesized two Ru^II polypyridyl complexes, [Ru(dmp)₂(fpp)]²⁺ (dmp=2,9‐dimethyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline; fpp=2‐[3,4‐(difluoromethylenedioxy)phenyl]imidazo[4,5‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline and [Ru(phen)₂(fpp)]²⁺ (phen=1,10‐phenanthroline). The DNA‐binding properties of these complexes have been investigated by spectroscopic titration, DNA melting experiments, viscosity measurements, and photoactivated cleavage. The mechanism studies of photocleavage revealed that singlet oxygen (¹O₂) and superoxide anion radical (O$\rm{{_{2}^{{^\cdot} -}}}$ ) may play an important role in the photocleavage. The cytotoxicity of complexes 1 and 2 have been evaluated by MTT (3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyl‐2H‐tetrazolium bromide) method; complex 2 shows slightly higher anticancer potency than 1 does against all the cell lines screened.     

Variation of DNA photocleavage efficiency for [(TL)2Ru(dpp)]Cl2 complexes where TL = 2,2′-bipyridine, 1,10-phenanthroline, or 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline

The complexes [(bpy)₂Ru(dpp)]Cl₂, [(phen)₂Ru(dpp)]Cl₂, and [(Ph₂phen)₂Ru(dpp)]Cl₂ (where dpp = 2,3-bis(2-pyridyl)pyrazine, bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, Ph₂phen = 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline) have been investigated and found to photocleave DNA via an oxygen-mediated pathway. These light absorbing complexes possess intense metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transitions in the visible region of the spectrum. The [(TL)₂Ru(dpp)]²⁺ systems populate ³MLCT states after visible light excitation, giving rise to emissions in aqueous solution centered at 692, 690, and 698 nm for TL = bpy, phen, and Ph₂phen respectively. The ³MLCT states and emissions are quenched by O₂, producing a reactive oxygen species. These complexes photocleave DNA with varying efficiencies, [(Ph₂phen)₂Ru(dpp)]²⁺ > [(phen)₂Ru(dpp)]²⁺ > [(bpy)₂Ru(dpp)]²⁺. The presence of the polyazine bridging ligand will allow these chromophores to be incorporated into larger supramolecular assemblies.     

Study of the spectroscopic and electrochemical properties of tetraruthenated porphyrins by theoretical-experimental approach

The spectroscopic and electrochemical properties of two isomeric forms of the supramolecular species [μ-(H₂TPyP){Ru(bpy)₂Cl}₄]⁴⁺ (H₂TPyP = 5,10,15,20-tetra(3- or 4-pyridyl)porphyrin, bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) have been compared and consistently interpreted with the aid of molecular orbital calculations. In these complexes, the HOMO and LUMO levels are predominantly localized in the ruthenium complexes and porphyrin ring, respectively. There is an extensive mixing of the wave functions of both components in other MOs, however, and their contributions are reflected in the spectroelectrochemical and spectroscopic behavior. For example, the electronic mixing is enough to allow the energy-transfer from the peripheral complexes to the porphyrin ring, as well as the appearance of a Ru^II(dπ) → H₄P(pπ*) charge-transfer band at 700 nm in the bis-protonated [μ-(H₄TPyP){Ru(bpy)₂Cl}₄]⁴⁺ species, showing the strong stabilization of the porphyrin LUMO levels.