Analysis of Obesity and Hyperinsulinemia in the Development of Metabolic Syndrome: San Antonio Heart Study

Objective: To use standardized cut‐offs of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist‐to‐hip ratio, and fasting insulin levels to predict the development of metabolic disorders and metabolic syndrome. Research Methods and Procedures: We performed an 8‐year follow‐up study of 628 non‐Hispanic whites and 1340 Mexican Americans, ages 25 to 64 years, from the second cohort of the San Antonio Heart Study. We defined metabolic disorders as dyslipidemia (triglycerides ≥2.26 mM or high‐density lipoprotein <0.91 mM in men and <1.17 mM in women), hypertension (blood pressure ≥140/≥90 mm Hg, or receiving antihypertensive medications), and type 2 diabetes (fasting glucose ≥7.0 mM, 2‐hour test glucose ≥11.1 mM, or receiving anti‐diabetic medications). People with at least two metabolic disorders were defined as having metabolic syndrome. Results: High waist‐to‐hip ratio and fasting insulin levels were significant predictors of developing metabolic syndrome. High anthropometric indices remained significant predictors of metabolic syndrome after adjusting for fasting insulin. Waist circumference, BMI, and insulin had similar areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (0.74 to 0.76). Further multivariate analyses combining these indices showed minimal increase in prediction. Of subjects who had a combination of high BMI (≥30 kg/m²) and high waist circumference (above “Action Level 2”), 32% developed metabolic syndrome, compared with 10% of subjects with both low BMI and low waist circumference. Discussion: These findings support the National Institutes of Health recommendations for reducing the risk of metabolic syndrome. Adjustment for baseline fasting insulin levels had only a small effect on the ability of anthropometric indices to predict the metabolic syndrome.     

Relationship of body size and shape to the development of diabetes in the diabetes prevention program

Objective: We report the effects of several different measures of body size at baseline on the subsequent development of diabetes. High levels of body fat predict the onset of diabetes, but this association has not been previously reported in a large multiethnic population of overweight or obese people with impaired glucose tolerance. Research Methods and Procedures: Height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, and skinfolds were measured at baseline in 3234 participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial to treat individuals with impaired glucose tolerance with placebo, metformin, or a lifestyle modification program. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the effect of baseline body size variables on the development of diabetes. Results: Over an average of 3.2 years in both the placebo and lifestyle groups, baseline waist circumference had the highest or second highest R² value for predicting diabetes in both sexes. Cox hazard ratios per 1 standard deviation were 1.43 and 1.49 for men in the placebo or lifestyle groups, respectively, and 1.29 and 1.53 for women in the placebo and lifestyle groups, respectively, adjusted for age and self‐reported race/ethnicity. The c‐statistic from the receiver operating characteristic curves also favored the waist circumference in men and women in the lifestyle group and men in the placebo group. No components of body size were predictive in the metformin‐treated group, and metformin compared with the placebo group was effective in preventing diabetes only in individuals with a BMI ≥35 kg/m² or a waist circumference ≥98.0 cm. Discussion: Large waist circumference was a better predictor of risk for developing diabetes than most other measures in the placebo and lifestyle groups. No baseline measure of body size or shape predicted risk of diabetes in the metformin‐treated group.     

Use of Glucose,Insulin, and C‐Reactive Protein to Determine Need for Glucose Tolerance Testing

Objective: Glucose intolerance has been shown to be a better predictor of morbidity and mortality than impaired fasting glucose. However, glucose tolerance tests are inconvenient and expensive. This study evaluated the relative frequencies of glucose intolerance and impaired fasting glucose and sought to determine if 2‐hour glucose could be predicted from simple demographic and laboratory data in an obese population. Research Methods and Procedures: Eighty‐nine obese subjects (median BMI 35 kg/m², range 30 to 40 kg/m²) underwent glucose tolerance testing. Using step‐wise linear and logistic regression analysis, fasting glucose, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hsCRP), fasting insulin, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, weight, height, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist‐to‐hip ratio, sex, and age were assessed as predictors of glucose intolerance. Results: Impaired glucose tolerance was more prevalent (27%) than impaired fasting glucose (5.6%). Only fasting glucose and hsCRP were significant (p < 0.05) independent predictors of impaired 2‐hour glucose (>140 mg/dL). A fasting glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL or an hsCRP > 0.32 mg/dL (upper quartile of the normal range) detected 81% (sensitivity) of obese subjects with impaired glucose tolerance; however, specificity was poor (46%). Fasting insulin ≥ 6 μU/mL had better sensitivity (92%) but poorer specificity (30%). Discussion: Impaired glucose tolerance is more common than impaired fasting glucose in an obese population. Possible strategies to avoid doing glucose tolerance tests in all obese patients would be to do glucose tolerance testing only in those whose fasting glucose is ≥ 100 mg/dL or whose hsCRP exceeds 0.32 mg/dL or those whose fasting insulin is ≥ 6 μU/mL.     

Predicting Incident Diabetes in Jamaica: The Role of Anthropometry

Objective: To evaluate the performance of the body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR), and waist‐to‐height ratio (WHTR) in predicting incident diabetes in Jamaica. Research Methods and Procedures: A cohort of 728 nondiabetic adults (290 men and 438 women), ages 25 to 74 years and residents of Spanish Town, Jamaica, were followed for a mean of 4 years. Participants had fasting and 2‐hour postchallenge glucose concentrations measured at baseline and follow‐up. Results: There were 51 cases of incident diabetes (17 men and 34 women). All indices were independent predictors of diabetes, and none was clearly superior. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (95% confidence interval) for BMI was 0.74 (0.59 to 0.88) for men and 0.62 (0.51 to 0.72) for women. For waist circumference, these values were 0.78 (0.65 to 0.91) in men and 0.61 (0.50 to 0.71) in women. Similar results were obtained for WHR and WHTR. “Optimal” cut‐off points for BMI were 24.8 kg/m² (men) and 29.3 kg/m² (women). For waist circumference, these were 88 cm and 84.5 cm for men and women, respectively. Corresponding values for WHR were 0.87 and 0.80 and for WHTR were 0.51 and 0.54, respectively. Discussion: Cut‐off points for waist circumference and WHR were similar to those proposed in developed countries for women but lower in men. Waist circumference could be useful in health promotion as an alternative to BMI.     

Abdominal obesity and coronary heart disease in Thai men

Objective: To determine the association of four simple anthropometric indices with coronary heart disease (CHD) in Thai men, and to determine the optimal cut‐off points for each index in the prediction of CHD. Research Methods and Procedures: This is a cohort study with 17 years of follow‐up. A total of 2536 male employees from the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand 35 to 59 years of age at baseline were included in the study. Height, weight, waist circumference, and hip circumference were measured to generate BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR), and waist‐to‐height ratio (WHtR). Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios by thirds of each index. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess discrimination of CHD. Results: WHtR was most strongly associated with CHD events in Thai men. The age‐adjusted hazard ratio for those in the highest, compared with the lowest, third was 2.89 (1.37, 6.11). Although WHtR had the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with the optimal cut‐off estimated to be 0.51 (sensitivity, 55%; specificity, 61%), no statistically significant difference (p > 0.10) was found between the AUC for WHtR and that for the other three indices. Conclusion: WHtR is, marginally, the best of the four indices considered to predict CHD events in Thai men.     

Larger Hip Circumference Independently Predicts Health and Longevity in a Swedish Female Cohort

Objective: The waist circumference is widely viewed as a simple but effective measure for assessing obesity‐related health risks, whereas measurement of the hip circumference is not currently prioritized. This study examines health risks associated specifically with hip circumference in a cohort of Swedish women, to determine whether information may be lost by excluding the hip circumference from health surveys. Research Methods and Procedures: The subjects described in this report constitute a population‐based sample of 38‐ to 60‐year‐old women who underwent anthropometric examinations in 1968. The 24‐year incidence rates have been ascertained for myocardial infarction, combined cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes. All‐cause, cardiovascular, and myocardial infarction mortality also were evaluated. Results: Hip circumference was a significant independent inverse risk estimator for all endpoints studied. Using Cox regression with adjustment for age, smoking, body mass index, and waist circumference, the remaining variability associated with larger hips was associated with significantly fewer adverse health outcomes. The hip circumference became statistically informative after body mass index adjustment. The strongest protective associations were observed for cardiovascular disease and diabetes endpoints, although significant trends were also seen for total mortality. Considering hip and waist simultaneously, the strength of the inverse association for large hips generally exceeded the positive association for waist. Discussion: Recent interest in the waist circumference as an effective screening tool has taken the focus off of the hip circumference. The present results suggest that collection of hip measurements should not be discontinued in assessment of obesity‐related risk status and health promotion.     

Larger Thigh and Hip Circumferences Are Associated with Better Glucose Tolerance: The Hoorn Study

Objective: A higher waist‐to‐hip ratio, which can be due to a higher waist circumference, a lower hip circumference, or both, is associated with higher glucose levels and incident diabetes. A lower hip circumference could reflect either lower fat mass or lower muscle mass. Muscle mass might be better reflected by thigh circumference. The aim of this study was to investigate the contributions of thigh and hip circumferences, independent of waist circumference, to measures of glucose metabolism. Research Methods and Procedures: For this cross‐sectional study we used baseline data from the Hoorn Study, a population‐based cohort study of glucose tolerance among 2484 men and women aged 50 to 75. Glucose tolerance was assessed by a 75‐g oral glucose tolerance test; hemoglobin A_1c and fasting insulin were also measured. Anthropometric measurements included body mass index (BMI) and waist, hip, and thigh circumferences. Results: Stratified analyses and multiple linear regression showed that after adjustment for age, BMI, and waist circumference, thigh circumference was negatively associated with markers of glucose metabolism in women, but not in men. Standardized β values in women were ?0.164 for fasting, ?0.206 for post‐load glucose, ?0.190 for hemoglobin A_1c (all p < 0.001), and ?0.065 for natural log insulin levels (p = 0.061). Hip circumference was negatively associated with markers of glucose metabolism in both sexes (standardized betas ranging from ?0.093 to ?0.296, p < 0.05) except for insulin in men. Waist circumference was positively associated with glucose metabolism. Discussion: Thigh circumference in women and hip circumference in both sexes are negatively associated with markers of glucose metabolism independently of the waist circumference, BMI, and age. Both fat and muscle tissues may contribute to these associations.     

Which Obesity Index Best Explains Prevalence Differences in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus?

Objective: Obesity drives the diabetes epidemic. However, it is not known which obesity index best explains variations in type 2 diabetes mellitus prevalence across populations. Research Methods and Procedures: We analyzed three cross‐sectional studies from San Antonio, TX, (Mexican‐Americans and non‐Hispanic whites, n = 2839), Mexico City (n = 2233), and Spain (n = 2161) (age range, 35 to 64 years). We used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to assess performance for identifying diabetic subjects and logistic regression analysis to examine differences in diabetes prevalence. Results: AUCs for waist circumference and BMI were similar in white subjects, but the AUC for waist circumference was greater in Mexican‐origin subjects (Mexican men, 0.594 vs. 0.549, p = 0.008; and women, 0.605 vs. 0.557, p = 0.002; Mexican‐American men, 0.648 vs. 0.600, p < 0.001; and women, 0.744 vs. 0.693, p < 0.001). The AUC for waist‐to‐height ratio tended to be greater than that for waist circumference, but statistical significance was demonstrated only in Mexican women (0.628 vs. 0.613, p = 0.044), Mexican‐American women (0.774 vs. 0.758, p < 0.001), and Spanish women (0.734 vs. 0.715, p = 0.039). No obesity index was consistently superior to the others for explaining differences in diabetes prevalence among populations. Conclusions: In white and Mexican‐origin men, waist circumference may be the preferred marker for identifying diabetic subjects on account of its simplicity; in women, waist‐to‐height ratio may be better. Differences in diabetes prevalence among these populations cannot be attributed to a single measure of obesity.     

Independent Association of Hip Circumference with Metabolic Profile in Different Ethnic Groups

Objective: In whites, a larger hip circumference has been shown to be associated with a better metabolic profile, after adjustment for BMI and waist circumference. Our aim was to investigate this association in a variety of ethnic groups, some highly susceptible to type 2 diabetes. Research Methods and Procedures: We measured weight, height, waist and hip circumferences, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting and 2‐hour postload glucose, triglycerides, and high‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol in 1020 Melanesians, 767 Micronesians, 3697 Indians, and 2710 Creoles from Pacific and Indian Ocean islands. Leptin and body fat percentage were determined in Indian and Creole Mauritians only. Results: In all ethnic groups, larger hip circumference was associated with lower glucose and triglyceride levels in both sexes and higher high‐density lipoprotein levels in women only, after adjustment for waist circumference, BMI, and age. Adjustment for height or leptin did not materially change the results. Discussion: In conclusion, we confirmed the protective association of relatively larger hips in four nonwhite ethnic groups. Leptin does not seem to play a mediating role in this association.     

BMI compared with central obesity indicators in relation to diabetes and hypertension in Asians

Objective: To compare BMI with waist circumference (WC), waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR), and waist‐to‐stature ratio (WSR) in association with diabetes or hypertension. Methods and Procedures: Cross‐sectional data from 16 cohorts from the DECODA (Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative Analysis of Diagnostic criteria in Asia) study, comprising 9,095 men and 11,732 women, aged 35–74 years, of different ethnicities were included in this meta‐analysis. Results: Age‐adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for diabetes in men (women) for 1 s.d. increase in BMI, WC, WHR, and WSR were 1.52 (1.59), 1.54 (1.70), 1.53 (1.50), and 1.62 (1.70), respectively; and the corresponding ORs for hypertension were 1.68 (1.55), 1.66 (1.51), 1.45 (1.28), and 1.63 (1.50). Paired homogeneity tests (BMI with each of the three) adjusted for age and cohort showed that diabetes had stronger association with WSR than BMI (P = 0.001) in men but with WC and WSR than BMI (both P < 0.05) in women. Hypertension had stronger association with BMI than WHR in men (P < 0.001) and had the strongest with BMI than the others (WHR P < 0.001; WSR P < 0.01; and WC P < 0.05) in women. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves adjusted for age and cohort were slightly larger for diabetes for WSR 0.735 (0.748) in men (women) and WC 0.749 (women only) than BMI 0.725 (0.742) while for hypertension larger for BMI 0.760 (0.766) than WHR 0.748 (0.751), but their 95% CIs were all overlapped. Discussion: WSR was stronger than BMI in association with diabetes, but these indicators were equally strongly associated with hypertension in Asians.     

Central rather than overall obesity is related to diabetes in the Chinese population: the InterASIA study

Objective: The objective was to compare central and overall obesity measurements for identifying diabetes mellitus (DM) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) level in the Chinese population. Research Methods and Procedures: Data for 15,236 Chinese adults between the ages of 35 and 74 years, obtained by the InterASIA Study in 2000–2001, were used for the current analyses. We analyzed the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) for waist circumference (WC), waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR), and BMI to determine the ability of these indices to identify DM and IFG in the study sample and bootstrapped samples. WC was used as a measure of central obesity and BMI as a measure of overall obesity. Results: The prevalence rates of central and overall obesity in the study population were 33.97% and 9.78%, respectively. The prevalence rates of IFG and DM were 7.34% and 5.51%, respectively. ROC analysis revealed significant differences between AUCs for WHR (0.666, 95% confidence interval, 0.647 to 0.685) and BMI (0.622, 95% confidence interval, 0.601 to 0.642) and for WC (0.661, 95% confidence interval, 0.643 to 0.682) and BMI for identifying DM (all p < 0.0001). The analysis also revealed significant differences between AUCs for WHR (0.638, 95% confidence interval, 0.619 to 0.655) and BMI (0.607, 95% confidence interval, 0.589 to 0.627) and for WC (0.637, 95% confidence interval, 0.615 to 0.654) and BMI for identifying IFG (all p < 0.001). Discussion: Central obesity is more related to DM and IFG than is overall obesity in the Chinese population, and both WC and WHR are equally able to identify DM.     

Liver enzymes as a predictor for incident diabetes in a Japanese population: the Hisayama study

Objective: We studied the relationship between liver enzymes and the development of diabetes in a general Japanese population. Research Methods and Procedures: A total of 1804 non‐diabetic subjects 40 to 79 years of age were followed‐up prospectively for a mean of 9.0 years. Results: During the follow‐up, 135 subjects developed diabetes. In both sexes, the age‐adjusted cumulative incidence of diabetes increased significantly with elevating quartiles of serum γ‐glutamyltransferase (GGT) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. This pattern was also observed in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) quartiles for men but not for women. In multivariate analyses after adjusting for comprehensive risk factors and other liver enzymes, the risk of developing diabetes was significantly higher in the highest GGT quartile than in the lowest quartile [odds ratio (OR), 2.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03 to 6.26 for men; OR, 5.73; 95% CI, 1.62 to 20.19 for women]. Similar results were observed in ALT quartiles (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 0.91 to 5.92 for men; OR, 4.40; 95% CI, 1.38 to 14.06 for women) but not in AST quartiles in either sex. Significant positive associations of GGT and ALT with diabetes were seen within each stratified category of risk factors, namely fasting insulin, BMI, waist‐to‐hip ratio, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein, and alcohol consumption. In receiver operating characteristic analyses, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of GGT and ALT were significantly larger than that of AST, fasting insulin, waist‐to‐hip ratio, or C‐reactive protein. Discussion: Our findings suggest that serum GGT and ALT concentrations are strong predictors of diabetes in the general population, independent of known risk factors.     

Neck Circumference as a Simple Screening Measure for Identifying Overweight and Obese Patients

Objective: There are numerous methods of assessing overweight and obesity. We undertook an observational study to test a method of identifying overweight or obese patients solely by measuring the circumference of the neck. Research Methods and Procedures: A test sample and a second validation sample included 979 subjects (460 men and 519 women), who visited a family medicine clinic in a southern Israeli urban district for any reason between the randomly chosen months of January and September 1998. Main outcome included neck, waist, and hip circumferences; body mass index (BMI); and waist:hip ratio measures. Results: Pearson's correlation coefficients indicated a significant association between neck circumference (NC) and: BMI (men, r = 0.83; women, r = 0.71; each, p < 0.0001), age (men, r = 0.33; women, r = 0.36; each, p < 0.0001), weight (men, r = 0.7; women, r = 0.81; each, p < 0.0001), waist circumference (men, r = 0.86; women, r = 0.85; each, p < 0.0001), hip circumference (men, r = 0.62; women, r = 0.56; each, p < 0.0001), and waist:hip ratio (men, r = 0.66; women, r = 0.87; each, p < 0.0001). NC ≥37 cm for men and ≥34 cm for women were the best cutoff levels for determining the subjects with BMI ≥25.0 kg/m² using the receiver output curve analysis. In the validation unrelated group, the test characteristics were excellent with 98% sensitivity, 89% specificity, and 94% accuracy for men, and 100% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and 99% accuracy for women. NC ≥39.5 cm for men and ≥36.5 cm for women were the best cutoff levels for determining the subjects with BMI ≥30 kg/m² using the receiver output curve analysis. In the validation unrelated group, the test characteristics were excellent with 93% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 91% accuracy for men, and 93% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and 97% accuracy for women. Discussion: NC measurement is a simple and time‐saving screening measure that can be used to identify overweight and obese patients. Men with NC <37 cm and women with NC <34 cm are not to be considered overweight. Patients with NC ≥37 cm for men and ≥34 cm for women require additional evaluation of overweight or obesity status.     

Associations of leukocyte telomere length with body anthropometric indices and weight change in chinese women

Objective: This study evaluated associations of telomere length with various anthropometric indices of general and abdominal obesity, as well as weight change. Design and Methods: The study included 2,912 Chinese women aged 40‐70 years. Monochrome multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction was applied to measure relative telomere length. Results: Telomere length was inversely associated with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist‐to‐height ratio, weight, and hip circumference (P_trend = 0.005, 0.004, 0.004, 0.010, and 0.026, respectively), but not waist‐to‐hip ratio (P_trend = 0.116) or height (P_trend = 0.675). Weight change since age 50 was further evaluated among women over age 55. Women who maintained their weight within ±5% since age 50, particularly within a normal range (BMI = 18.5‐24.9 kg/m²), or reduced their weight from overweight (BMI = 25‐29.9 kg/m²) or obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) to normal range, had a longer mean of current telomere length than women who gained weight since age 50 (P_trend = 0.025), particularly those who stayed in obesity or gained weight from normal range or overweight to obesity (P = 0.023). Conclusion: Our findings show that telomere shortening is associated with obesity and that maintaining body weight within a normal range helps maintain telomere length.     

Combination of BMI and Waist Circumference for Identifying Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Whites

Objective: BMI (kilograms per meters squared) and waist circumference (WC) (measured in centimeters) are each associated with the risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Therefore, a combination of the two may be more effective in identifying subjects at risk than either alone. The present study sought to identify the combination of BMI and WC that has the strongest association with CVD risk factors in whites. Research Methods and Procedures: Subjects were 8712 white men and women from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The optimal combination of BMI and WC was developed using logistic regression models with BMI and WC as predictors and CVD risk factors as outcomes. The combined measure of BMI and WC using current cut‐off points was also examined. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristics curves were compared between the combined measures and BMI alone. Results: For white men, the optimal combination of BMI and WC for identifying CVD risk factors was 0.68 × BMI + 0.32 × WC. This combination generated a score that better estimated the odds of having CVD risk factors than either alone. For white women, WC alone largely determined the likelihood of having CVD risks. The combination of BMI and WC using current cut‐off points may provide an improved measure of CVD risk. Combined measures showed a higher sensitivity or a shorter distance in receiver operating characteristic curves in the identification of CVD risk factors. Discussion: Combined measures of BMI and WC may provide a higher overall test performance for CVD risk factors and may be useful in some ethnic groups as an improved means of screening subjects for further evaluation in the clinical setting.     

Appropriate Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference Cutoffs for Categorization of Overweight and Central Adiposity among Uighur Adults in Xinjiang

Objective

The current overweight and central adiposity guidelines based on Western populations were not consistent with many studied based on the Asian populations. Uighur people live in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region which is located in the center of Asia. Their overweight and central cutoffs were largely unknown. We aimed to identify cutoffs for body mass index (BMI; in kg/m²) and waist circumference (WC; in cm) for categorization of overweight and central adiposity among Uighur adults in Xinjiang.

Methods

4767 Uighur participants were selected from the Cardiovascular Risk Survey (CRS) which was carried out from October 2007 to March 2010. The age of the participants were from 35 to 101 years old with the mean age of 50.09 years. Anthropometric data, blood pressure, serum concentration of serum total cholesterol, triglyceride, low density lipoprotein (LDL), high density lipoprotein (HDL) and fasting glucose were documented. The prevalence, sensitivity, specificity and distance on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of each BMI and waist circumference values were calculated.

Results

The prevalence of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were higher with higher BMI for both men and women. The prevalence of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia were higher with higher waist circumference for both men and women. In women, the prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia was noticed to increase as the waist circumference increased. The shortest distance in the receiver operating characteristic curves for hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, or ≥ 2 of these risk factors suggested a BMI cutoff of 26 and a waist circumference cutoff of 90 cm for both men and women.

Conclusions

Higher cutoffs for BMI and waist circumference are needed in the identification of Uighur patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease.     

Overweight,Waist Circumference,Age, Gender,and Insulin Resistance as Risk Factors for Hyperleptinemia

Objective: To evaluate the influence of overweight, waist circumference, age, gender, and insulin resistance as risk factors for hyperleptinemia. Research Methods and Procedures: A cross‐sectional study was carried out in a population of 197 subjects: 59 men (21 aged <60 years and 38 aged ≥60 years) and 138 women (37 aged <60 years and 101 aged ≥60 years). The groups were stratified by overweight and normal weight. After a 12‐hour fasting period, we measured serum leptin and insulin levels with radioimmunoassay methods. We also measured serum glucose and lipid profile. The data were analyzed by means of comparative tests. A variance‐stabilizing transformation (natural logarithmic) was used to meet multiple linear regression, analysis of covariance, and logistic regression models. Results: The leptin serum levels were higher and statistically significant in young and older women than they were in men. We observed an interaction between gender and body mass index to explain the difference in leptin levels (p < 0.0001). Our study demonstrated an inverse relationship between leptin with age and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol. In logistic regression analysis, the overweight × gender interaction and waist circumference have a statistically significant influence as independent variables on hyperleptinemia (overweight × gender odds ratio = 6.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 46.86; p < 0.05 and waist circumference odds ratio = 4.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.47 to 12.83; p = 0.001). Discussion: Women who were overweight or had a higher waist circumference (women ≥ 88 cm and men ≥ 102 cm) have a significantly higher risk of having hyperleptinemia. The increase in age as an isolated variable is not a risk factor for hyperleptinemia.     

Trends in Waist Circumference among U.S. Adults

Objective: Waist circumference has been proposed as a measure of obesity or as an adjunct to other anthropometric measures to determine obesity. Our objective was to examine temporal trends in waist circumference among adults in the U.S. Research Methods and Procedures: We used data from 15, 454 participants ≥20 years old in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III (1988 to 1994) and 4024 participants ≥20 years old from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999 to 2000. Results: The unadjusted waist circumference increased from 95.3 (age‐adjusted, 96.0 cm) to 98.6 (age‐adjusted, 98.9 cm) cm among men and from 88.7 (age‐adjusted 88.9 cm) to 92.2 (age‐adjusted 92.1 cm) cm among women. The percentiles from the two surveys suggest that much of the waist circumference distribution has shifted. Statistically significant increases occurred among all age groups and racial or ethnic groups except men 30 to 59 years old, women 40 to 59 and ≥70 years old, and women who were Mexican American or of “other” race or ethnicity. Discussion: These results demonstrate the rapid increase in obesity, especially abdominal obesity, among U.S. adults. Unless measures are taken to slow the increase in or reverse the course of the obesity epidemic, the burden of obesity‐associated morbidity and mortality in the U.S. can be expected to increase substantially in future years.     

Lifestyle intervention in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: impact of the patient's educational background

Objective: To determine whether people with different educational backgrounds respond differently to a lifestyle intervention program for obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Research Methods and Procedures: The study consisted of a 12‐month randomized controlled trial of 147 health plan members with type 2 diabetes who were overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 27 kg/m²). Participants were randomized to lifestyle case management or usual care. Case management (CM) involved group and individual education, support, and referral by registered dietitians. Usual care (UC) participants received educational material. Both groups received ongoing primary care. A post hoc analysis was performed, evaluating the impact of education level on intervention group differences with respect to change in weight and waist circumference. Results: There was a significant education by group interaction for both changes in weight (p = 0.02) and waist circumference (p = 0.01) during the study period. Contrary to expectations, CM participants with less formal education had greater risk reductions compared with more educated participants. Models predicted that, by 12 months, those with less education in the UC group gained 1.71 kg more in weight and 3.67 cm more in waist circumference than those with greater education. However, by 12 months, those in the CM group with less education lost a model‐predicted 3.30 kg more in weight and 4.95 cm more in waist circumference than those with more formal education. Discussion: People with varied educational backgrounds may respond differently to a lifestyle intervention for weight management and diabetes control.     

Low Fasting Triglycerides: Hallmark of the Healthy Large Hip?

Body fat distribution modulates risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus. We evaluated potentially involved metabolic risk factors. In a population of 282 male and 157 female healthy subjects (data from the San Antonio and the European Group of Insulin Resistance (EGIR) study cohorts), we evaluated associations between body fat distribution (assessed by waist and hip circumference) and parameters of lipid‐ and glucose metabolism, including clamp measurements of insulin sensitivity. After stratification for BMI, fasting triglycerides were lower in the presence of a large hip, and higher in a large waist. Persons with the largest BMI (3rd tertile) showed a difference in triglyceride levels of 1.5 vs. 2.4 mmol/l in large vs. small hip circumference groups (P < 0.038), and a difference of 1.5 vs. 1.2 mmol/l in large vs. small waist circumference groups (P < 0.025). A similar analysis did not reveal a difference in insulin sensitivity. Linear regression analyses confirmed the findings; they revealed negative associations between triglycerides and hip, and (for women borderline statistically significant) positive associations between triglycerides and waist, after adjustment for BMI, mutual confounding, and age (β ± s.e.; men: ?0.48 ± 0.005, P < 0.001, and 0.21 ± 0.005, P < 0.05; women: ?0.78 ± 0.007, P < 0.001, and 0.24 ± 0.005, P < 0.065), respectively. Linear regression analyses revealed similar opposite associations with high‐density lipoprotein (HDL)‐cholesterol, though not with glucose, insulin, or insulin sensitivity as measured with the clamp method. In our study population of healthy persons, body fat distribution is associated with fasting triglycerides and HDL‐cholesterol, and not with insulin sensitivity. Metabolic risk of unfavorable body fat distribution may be modulated by lower triglyceride storage capacity.