Regulation of the lateral association of phospholipase Cbeta2 and G protein subunits by lipid rafts

One function of membrane domains of liquid-ordered lipids or "rafts" may be to stabilize complexes of signaling proteins, thereby playing a role in the transduction of cellular signals. Here, we have used fluorescence methods to directly test this idea by assessing the ability of phospholipase Cbeta2 (PLCbeta2) to associate with G protein subunits on model membranes in the fluid phase and on membranes that contain domains of lipids in the liquid-ordered phase (rafts). We find that the apparent dissociation constant for the equilibrium between PLCbeta2 and Galpha(q)(GTPgammaS) was identical on both types of membrane surfaces. However, the degree of association between PLCbeta2 and Gbetagamma subunits was significantly reduced on the surfaces containing rafts. Time studies indicate that this phenomenon is a dynamic process. Incorporating the lipid substrate of PLCbeta2 into membranes that forms rafts, we find that its basal activity is unaffected. However, its activation by Gbetagamma subunits is inhibited, supporting a reduced degree of interaction between these two proteins when rafts are present. Since lipid rafts affected PLCbeta2-Gbetagamma association and not PLCbeta2-Galpha(q)(GTPgammaS) association, we explored the possibility that the membrane interaction of Gbetagamma differed when rafts are present. We find that although the membrane partition coefficient of Gbetagamma is not significantly changed in the presence of rafts, proteolysis of Gbetagamma by trypsin increases and the ability of Gbetagamma Tyr/Trp fluorescence to be quenched by iodide ions decreases when rafts are present. These results suggest a model in which lipid rafts occlude the PLCbeta2 interaction site on Gbetagamma subunits by localizing these subunits at the domain interface.     

Determination of the activation volume of PLCbeta by Gbeta gamma-subunits through the use of high hydrostatic pressure

Activation of phospholipase Cbeta (PLCbeta) by G-proteins results in increased intracellular Ca(2+) and activation of protein kinase C. We have previously found that activated PLCbeta-Gbetagamma complex can be rapidly deactivated by Galpha(GDP) subunits without dissociation, which led to the suggestion that Galpha(GDP) binds to PLCbeta-Gbeta gamma and perturbs the activating interaction without significantly affecting the PLCbeta-Gbeta gamma binding energy. Here, we have used high pressure fluorescence spectroscopy to determine the volume change associated with this interaction. Since PLCbeta and G-protein subunits associate on membrane surfaces, we worked under conditions where the membrane surface properties are not expected to change. We also determined the pressure range in which the proteins remain membrane bound: PLCbeta binding was stable throughout the 1-2000 bars range, Gbeta gamma binding was stable only at high membrane concentrations, whereas Galpha(s)(GDP) dissociated from membranes above 1 kbar. High pressure dissociated PLCbeta-Gbeta gamma with a DeltaV = 34 +/- 5 ml/mol. This same volume change is obtained for a peptide derived from Gbeta which also activates PLCbeta. In the presence of Galpha(s)(GDP), the volume change associated with PLCbeta-Gbeta gamma interaction is reduced to 25 +/- 1 ml/mol. These results suggest that activation of PLCbeta by Gbeta gamma is conferred by a small (i.e., 3-15 ml/mol) volume element.     

Determination of the contact energies between a regulator of G protein signaling and G protein subunits and phospholipase C beta 1

Cell signaling proteins may form functional complexes that are capable of rapid signal turnover. These contacts may be stabilized by either scaffolding proteins or multiple interactions between members of the complex. In this study, we have determined the affinities between a regulator of G protein signaling protein, RGS4, and three members of the G protein-phospholipase Cbeta (PLC-beta) signaling cascade which may allow for rapid deactivation of intracellular Ca(2+) release and activation of protein kinase C. Specifically, using fluorescence methods, we have determined the interaction energies between the RGS4, PLC-beta, G-betagamma, and both deactivated (GDP-bound) and activated (GTPgammaS-bound) Galpha(q). We find that RGS4 not only binds to activated Galpha(q), as predicted, but also to Gbetagamma and PLCbeta(1). These interactions occur through protein-protein contacts since the intrinsic membrane affinity of RGS4 was found to be very weak in the absence of the protein partner PLCbeta(1) or a lipid regulator, phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5 trisphosphate. Ternary complexes between Galpha(q), Gbetagamma and phospholipase Cbeta(1) will form, but only at relatively high protein concentrations. We propose that these interactions allow RGS4 to remain anchored to the signaling complex even in the quiescent state and allow rapid transfer to activated Galpha(q) to shut down the signal. Comparison of the relative affinities between these interacting proteins will ultimately allow us to determine whether certain complexes can form and where signals will be directed.     

The visual G protein of fly photoreceptors interacts with the PDZ domain assembled INAD signaling complex via direct binding of activated Galpha(q) to phospholipase cbeta

Visual transduction in the compound eye of flies is a well-established model system for the study of G protein-coupled transduction pathways. Pivotal components of this signaling pathway, including the principal light-activated Ca(2+) channel transient receptor potential, an eye-specific protein kinase C, and the norpA-encoded phospholipase Cbeta, are assembled into a supramolecular signaling complex by the modular PDZ domain protein INAD. We have used immunoprecipitation assays to study the interaction of the heterotrimeric visual G protein with this INAD signaling complex. Light-activated Galpha(q)- guanosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) and AlF(4)(-)-activated Galpha(q), but not Gbetagamma, form a stable complex with the INAD signaling complex. This interaction requires the presence of norpA-encoded phospholipase Cbeta, indicating that phospholipase Cbeta is the target of activated Galpha(q). Our data establish that the INAD signaling complex is a light-activated target of the phototransduction pathway, with Galpha(q) forming a molecular on-off switch that shuttles the visual signal from activated rhodopsin to INAD-linked phospholipase Cbeta.     

Clathrin-mediated endocytosis of m3 muscarinic receptors. Roles for Gbetagamma and tubulin

Receptors as well as some G protein subunits internalize after agonist stimulation. It is not clear whether Galpha(q) or Gbetagamma undergo such regulated translocation. Recent studies demonstrate that m3 muscarinic receptor activation in SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells causes recruitment of tubulin to the plasma membrane. This subsequently transactivates Galpha(q) and activates phospholipase Cbeta1. Interaction of tubulin-GDP with Gbetagamma at the offset of phospholipase Cbeta1 signaling appears involved in translocation of tubulin and Gbetagamma to vesicle-like structures in the cytosol (Popova, J. S., and Rasenick, M. M. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 34299-34308). The relationship of this internalization to the clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the activated m3 muscarinic receptors or Galpha(q) involvement in this process has not been clarified. To test this, SK-N-SH cells were treated with carbachol, and localization of Galpha(q), Gbetagamma, tubulin, clathrin, and m3 receptors were analyzed by both cellular imaging and biochemical techniques. Upon agonist stimulation both tubulin and clathrin translocated to the plasma membrane and co-localized with receptors, Galpha(q) and Gbetagamma. Fifteen minutes later receptors, Gbetagamma and tubulin, but not Galpha(q), internalized with the clathrin-coated vesicles. Coimmunoprecipitation of m3 receptors with Gbetagamma, tubulin, and clathrin from the cytosol of carbachol-treated cells was readily observed. These data suggested that Gbetagamma subunits might organize the formation of a multiprotein complex linking m3 receptors to tubulin since they interacted with both proteins. Such protein assemblies might explain the dynamin-dependent but beta-arrestin-independent endocytosis of m3 muscarinic receptors since tubulin interaction with dynamin might guide or insert the complex into clathrin-coated pits. This novel mechanism of internalization might prove important for other beta-arrestin-independent endocytic pathways. It also suggests cross-regulation between G protein-mediated signaling and the dynamics of the microtubule cytoskeleton.     

Gbetagamma inhibits Galpha GTPase-activating proteins by inhibition of Galpha-GTP binding during stimulation by receptor

Gbetagamma subunits modulate several distinct molecular events involved with G protein signaling. In addition to regulating several effector proteins, Gbetagamma subunits help anchor Galpha subunits to the plasma membrane, promote interaction of Galpha with receptors, stabilize the binding of GDP to Galpha to suppress spurious activation, and provide membrane contact points for G protein-coupled receptor kinases. Gbetagamma subunits have also been shown to inhibit the activities of GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), both phospholipase C (PLC)-betas and RGS proteins, when assayed in solution under single turnover conditions. We show here that Gbetagamma subunits inhibit G protein GAP activity during receptor-stimulated, steady-state GTPase turnover. GDP/GTP exchange catalyzed by receptor requires Gbetagamma in amounts approximately equimolar to Galpha, but GAP inhibition was observed with superstoichiometric Gbetagamma. The potency of inhibition varied with the GAP and the Galpha subunit, but half-maximal inhibition of the GAP activity of PLC-beta1 was observed with 5-10 nM Gbetagamma, which is at or below the concentrations of Gbetagamma needed for regulation of physiologically relevant effector proteins. The kinetics of GAP inhibition of both receptor-stimulated GTPase activity and single turnover, solution-based GAP assays suggested a competitive mechanism in which Gbetagamma competes with GAPs for binding to the activated, GTP-bound Galpha subunit. An N-terminal truncation mutant of PLC-beta1 that cannot be directly regulated by Gbetagamma remained sensitive to inhibition of its GAP activity, suggesting that the Gbetagamma binding site relevant for GAP inhibition is on the Galpha subunit rather than on the GAP. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer between cyan or yellow fluorescent protein-labeled G protein subunits and Alexa532-labeled RGS4, we found that Gbetagamma directly competes with RGS4 for high-affinity binding to Galpha(i)-GDP-AlF4.     

The pleckstrin homology domain of phospholipase Cbeta transmits enzymatic activation through modulation of the membrane-domain orientation

Phospholipase Cbeta (PLCbeta) enzymes are activated by Galpha q and Gbetagamma subunits and catalyze the hydrolysis of the minor membrane lipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2]. Activation of PLCbeta2 by Gbetagamma subunits has been shown to be conferred through its N-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, although the underlying mechanism is unclear. Also unclear are observations that the extent of Gbetagamma activation differs on different membrane surfaces. In this study, we have identified a unique region of the PH domain of the PLCbeta2 domain (residues 71-88) which, when added to the enzyme as a peptide, causes enzyme activation similar to that with Gbetagamma subunits. This PH domain segment interacts strongly with membranes composed of lipid mixtures but not those containing lipids with electrically neutral zwitterionic headgroups. Also, addition of this segment perturbs interaction of the catalytic domain, but not the PH domain, with membrane surfaces. We monitored the orientation of the PH and catalytic domains of PLC by intermolecular fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) using the Gbetagamma activatable mutant, PLCbeta2/delta1(C193S). We find an increase in the level of FRET with binding to membranes with mixed lipids but not to those containing only lipids with electrically neutral headgroups. These results suggest that enzymatic activation can be conferred through optimal association of the PHbeta71-88 region to specific membrane surfaces. These studies allow us to understand the basis of variations of Gbetagamma activation on different membrane surfaces.     

Regulator of G-protein signaling 3 (RGS3) inhibits Gbeta1gamma 2-induced inositol phosphate production, mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, and Akt activation

Regulator of G-protein signaling 3 (RGS3) enhances the intrinsic rate at which Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) hydrolyze GTP to GDP, thereby limiting the duration in which GTP-Galpha(i) and GTP-Galpha(q) can activate effectors. Since GDP-Galpha subunits rapidly combine with free Gbetagamma subunits to reform inactive heterotrimeric G-proteins, RGS3 and other RGS proteins may also reduce the amount of Gbetagamma subunits available for effector interactions. Although RGS6, RGS7, and RGS11 bind Gbeta(5) in the absence of a Ggamma subunit, RGS proteins are not known to directly influence Gbetagamma signaling. Here we show that RGS3 binds Gbeta(1)gamma(2) subunits and limits their ability to trigger the production of inositol phosphates and the activation of Akt and mitogen-activated protein kinase. Co-expression of RGS3 with Gbeta(1)gamma(2) inhibits Gbeta(1)gamma(2)-induced inositol phosphate production and Akt activation in COS-7 cells and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in HEK 293 cells. The inhibition of Gbeta(1)gamma(2) signaling does not require an intact RGS domain but depends upon two regions in RGS3 located between acids 313 and 390 and between 391 and 458. Several other RGS proteins do not affect Gbeta(1)gamma(2) signaling in these assays. Consistent with the in vivo results, RGS3 inhibits Gbetagamma-mediated activation of phospholipase Cbeta in vitro. Thus, RGS3 may limit Gbetagamma signaling not only by virtue of its GTPase-activating protein activity for Galpha subunits, but also by directly interfering with the activation of effectors.     

Reassembly of phospholipase C-beta2 from separated domains: analysis of basal and G protein-stimulated activities

Phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C-betas (PLC-betas) are the only PLC isoforms that are regulated by G protein subunits. To further understand the regulation of PLC-beta(2) by G proteins and the functional roles of PLC-beta(2) structural domains, we tested whether the separately expressed amino and carboxyl halves of PLC-beta(2) could associate to form catalytically active enzymes as two polypeptides, and we explored how the complexes thus formed would be regulated by G protein betagamma subunits (Gbetagamma). We expressed cDNA constructs encoding PLC-beta(2) fragments of different lengths in COS-7 cells and demonstrated by coimmunoprecipitation that the coexpressed fragments could assemble and functionally reconstitute an active PLC-beta(2). The pleckstrin homology domain of PLC-beta(2) was required for its targeting to the membrane and for substrate hydrolysis. Reconstituted enzymes that contained the linker region that joins the two catalytic domains were as active or more active than the wild-type PLC-beta(2). When the linker region was removed, basal PLC-beta(2) enzymatic activity was increased further, suggesting that the linker region exerts an inhibitory effect on basal PLC-beta(2) activity. The reconstituted enzymes, like wild-type PLC-beta(2), were activated by Gbetagamma; when the C-terminal region was present in these constructs, they were also activated by Galpha(q). Gbetagamma and Galpha(q) activated these PLC-beta(2) constructs equally in the presence or absence of the linker region. We conclude that the linker region is an inhibitory element in PLC-beta(2) and that Gbetagamma and Galpha(q) do not stimulate PLC-beta(2) through easing the inhibition of enzymatic activity by the linker region.     

Selective regulation of Galpha(q/11) by an RGS domain in the G protein-coupled receptor kinase, GRK2

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are well characterized regulators of G protein-coupled receptors, whereas regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins directly control the activity of G protein alpha subunits. Interestingly, a recent report (Siderovski, D. P., Hessel, A., Chung, S., Mak, T. W., and Tyers, M. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 211-212) identified a region within the N terminus of GRKs that contained homology to RGS domains. Given that RGS domains demonstrate AlF(4)(-)-dependent binding to G protein alpha subunits, we tested the ability of G proteins from a crude bovine brain extract to bind to GRK affinity columns in the absence or presence of AlF(4)(-). This revealed the specific ability of bovine brain Galpha(q/11) to bind to both GRK2 and GRK3 in an AlF(4)(-)-dependent manner. In contrast, Galpha(s), Galpha(i), and Galpha(12/13) did not bind to GRK2 or GRK3 despite their presence in the extract. Additional studies revealed that bovine brain Galpha(q/11) could also bind to an N-terminal construct of GRK2, while no binding of Galpha(q/11), Galpha(s), Galpha(i), or Galpha(12/13) to comparable constructs of GRK5 or GRK6 was observed. Experiments using purified Galpha(q) revealed significant binding of both Galpha(q) GDP/AlF(4)(-) and Galpha(q)(GTPgammaS), but not Galpha(q)(GDP), to GRK2. Activation-dependent binding was also observed in both COS-1 and HEK293 cells as GRK2 significantly co-immunoprecipitated constitutively active Galpha(q)(R183C) but not wild type Galpha(q). In vitro analysis revealed that GRK2 possesses weak GAP activity toward Galpha(q) that is dependent on the presence of a G protein-coupled receptor. However, GRK2 effectively inhibited Galpha(q)-mediated activation of phospholipase C-beta both in vitro and in cells, possibly through sequestration of activated Galpha(q). These data suggest that a subfamily of the GRKs may be bifunctional regulators of G protein-coupled receptor signaling operating directly on both receptors and G proteins.     

RACK1 regulates specific functions of Gbetagamma

We showed previously that Gbetagamma interacts with Receptor for Activated C Kinase 1 (RACK1), a protein that not only binds activated protein kinase C (PKC) but also serves as an adaptor/scaffold for many signaling pathways. Here we report that RACK1 does not interact with Galpha subunits or heterotrimeric G proteins but binds free Gbetagamma subunits released from activated heterotrimeric G proteins following the activation of their cognate receptors in vivo. The association with Gbetagamma promotes the translocation of RACK1 from the cytosol to the membrane. Moreover, binding of RACK1 to Gbetagamma results in inhibition of Gbetagamma-mediated activation of phospholipase C beta2 and adenylyl cyclase II. However, RACK1 has no effect on other functions of Gbetagamma, such as activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway or chemotaxis of HEK293 cells via the chemokine receptor CXCR2. Similarly, RACK1 does not affect signal transduction through the Galpha subunits of G(i), G(s), or G(q). Collectively, these findings suggest a role of RACK1 in regulating specific functions of Gbetagamma.     

Dissecting G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathways with membrane-permeable blocking peptides. Endogenous 5-HT(2C) receptors in choroid plexus epithelial cells

To determine the intracellular signaling mechanism of the 5-HT(2C) receptor endogenously expressed in choroid plexus epithelial cells, we implemented a strategy of targeted disruption of protein-protein interactions. This strategy entails the delivery of conjugated membrane-permeable peptides that disrupt domain interaction at specific steps in the signaling cascade. As proof of concept, two peptides targeted against receptor-G protein interaction domains were examined. Only G(q)CT, which targets the receptor-G(q) protein interacting domain, disrupted 5-HT(2C) receptor-mediated phosphatidylinositide hydrolysis. G(s)CT, targeting the receptor-G(s) protein, disrupted beta2 adrenergic receptor-mediated activation of cAMP but not 5-HT(2C) receptor-mediated phosphatidylinositide hydrolysis. The peptide MPS-PLCbeta1M, mimicking the domain of phospholipase Cbeta1 (PLCbeta1) interacting with active Galpha(q), also blocked 5-HT(2C) receptor activation. In contrast, peptides PLCbeta2M and Phos that bind to and sequester free Gbetagamma subunits were ineffective at blocking 5-HT(2C) receptor-mediated phosphoinositol turnover. However, both peptides disrupted Gbetagamma-mediated alpha(2A) adrenergic receptor activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. These results provide the first direct demonstration that active Galpha(q) subunits mediate endogenous 5-HT(2C) receptor activation of PLCbeta and that Gbetagamma subunits released from Galpha(q) heterotrimeric proteins are not involved. Comparable results were obtained with metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 expressed in astrocytes. Thus, conjugated, membrane-permeable peptides are effective tools for the dissection of intracellular signals.     

The Gbetagamma dimer drives the interaction of heterotrimeric Gi proteins with nonlamellar membrane structures

Heterotrimeric G proteins are peripheral membrane proteins that propagate signals from membrane receptors to regulatory proteins localized in distinct cellular compartments. To facilitate signal amplification, G proteins are in molar excess with respect to G protein-coupled receptors. Because G proteins are capable of translocating from membrane to cytosol, protein-lipid interactions play a crucial role in signal transduction. Here, we studied the binding of heterotrimeric G proteins (Galphabetagamma) to model membranes (liposomes) and that of the entities formed upon receptor-mediated activation (Galpha and Gbetagamma). The model membranes used were composed of defined membrane lipids capable of organizing into either lamellar or nonlamellar (hexagonal H(II)) membrane structures. We demonstrated that although heterotrimeric G(i) proteins and Gbetagamma dimers can bind to lipid bilayers of phosphatidylcholine, their binding to membranes was markedly and significantly enhanced by the presence of nonlamellar phases of phosphatidylethanolamine. Conversely, activated G protein alpha subunits showed an opposite membrane binding behavior with a marked preference for lamellar membranes. These results have important consequences in cell signaling. First, the binding characteristics of the Gbetagamma dimer account for the lipid binding behavior and the cellular localization of heterotrimeric G proteins. Second, the distinct protein-lipid interactions of heterotrimeric G proteins, Gbetagamma dimers, and Galpha subunits with membrane lipids explain, in part, their different cellular mobilizations during signaling upon receptor activation. Finally, their differential interactions with lipids suggest an active role of the membrane lipid secondary structure in the propagation of signals through G protein-coupled receptors.     

Specificity of Gbetagamma signaling to Kir3 channels depends on the helical domain of pertussis toxin-sensitive Galpha subunits

Acetylcholine signaling through muscarinic type 2 receptors activates atrial G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) (Kir3) channels via the betagamma subunits of G proteins (Gbetagamma). Different combinations of recombinant Gbetagamma subunits have been shown to activate Kir3 channels in a similar manner. In native systems, however, only Gbetagamma subunits associated with the pertussis toxin-sensitive Galpha(i/o) subunits signal to K(+) channels. Additionally, in vitro binding experiments supported the notion that the C terminus of Kir3 channels interacts preferentially with Galpha(i) over Galpha(q). In this study we confirmed in two heterologous expression systems a preference of Galpha(i) over Galpha(q) in the activation of K(+) currents. To identify determinants of Gbetagamma signaling specificity, we first exchanged domains of Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) subunits responsible for receptor coupling selectivity and swapped their receptor coupling partners. Our results established that the G proteins, regardless of the receptor type to which they coupled, conferred specificity to Kir3 activation. We next tested signaling through chimeras between the Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) subunits in which the N terminus, the helical, or the GTPase domains of the Galpha subunits were exchanged. Our results revealed that the helical domain of Galpha(i) (residues 63-175) in the background of Galpha(q) could support Kir3 activation, whereas the reverse chimera could not. Moreover, the helical domain of the Galpha(i) subunit conferred "Galpha(i)-like" binding of the Kir3 C terminus to the Galpha(q) subunits that contained it. These results implicate the helical domain of Galpha(i) proteins as a critical determinant of Gbetagamma signaling specificity.     

Parallel regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3 (MKK3) and MKK6 in Gq-signaling cascade

Heterotrimeric G protein G(q) stimulates the activity of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) in mammalian cells. To investigate the signaling mechanism whereby alpha and betagamma subunits of G(q) activate p38 MAPK, we introduced kinase-deficient mutants of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3 (MKK3), MKK4, and MKK6 into human embryonal kidney 293 cells. The activation of p38 MAPK by Galpha(q) and Gbetagamma was blocked by kinase-deficient MKK3 and MKK6 but not by kinase-deficient MKK4. In addition, Galpha(q) and Gbetagamma stimulated MKK3 and MKK6 activities. The MKK3 and MKK6 activations by Galpha(q), but not by Gbetagamma, were dependent on phospholipase C and c-Src. Galpha(q) stimulated MKK3 in a Rac- and Cdc42-dependent manner and MKK6 in a Rho-dependent manner. On the other hand, Gbetagamma activated MKK3 in a Rac- and Cdc42-dependent manner and MKK6 in a Rho-, Rac-, and Cdc42-dependent manner. Gbetagamma-induced MKK3 and MKK6 activations were dependent on a tyrosine kinase other than c-Src. These results suggest that Galpha(q) and Gbetagamma stimulate the activity of p38 MAPK by regulating MKK3 and MKK6 through parallel signaling pathways.     

Galpha(q/11) and gbetagamma proteins and membrane signaling of calcitriol and estradiol.

17beta-estradiol and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3)()(calcitriol) rapidly increase (< 5 sec) the concentration of intracellular calcium by mobilizing Ca(2+) from the endoplasmic reticulum and forming inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP(3)) and diacylglycerol. Calcitriol increases InsP(3) formation via activation of phospholipase C (PLC)-beta1 linked to a pertussis toxin (PTX)-insensitive G-protein, and estradiol via activation of PLC-beta2 linked to a PTX-sensitive G-protein. Since PLC are effectors of different subunits of various G-proteins, we looked for and identified several G-subunits (Galpha(q/11), Galphas, Galphai, Gbeta and Ggamma) in female rat osteoblasts using Western immunoblotting. The action of calcitriol on InsP(3) formation and Ca(2+) mobilization in Fura-2-loaded confluent osteoblasts involved Galpha(q/11). The membrane effects of estradiol involved Gbetagamma; subunits, and principally Gbeta subunits, but not alpha-subunits. These results may provide additional evidence for membrane receptors of steroid hormones. Since PLC-beta1 is the target effector of Galpha(q/11), whereas PLC-beta2 is only activated by betagamma subunits, this specificity may help to generate membrane receptor-specific responses in vivo.     

The role of G beta gamma and domain interfaces in the activation of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2

In response to extracellular signals, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) catalyze guanine nucleotide exchange on Galpha subunits, enabling both activated Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits to target downstream effector enzymes. One target of Gbetagamma is G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), an enzyme that initiates homologous desensitization by phosphorylating activated GPCRs. GRK2 consists of three distinct domains: an RGS homology (RH) domain, a protein kinase domain, and a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, through which it binds Gbetagamma. The crystal structure of the GRK2-Gbetagamma complex revealed that the domains of GRK2 are intimately associated and left open the possibility for allosteric regulation by Gbetagamma. In this paper, we report the 4.5 A structure of GRK2, which shows that the binding of Gbetagamma does not induce large domain rearrangements in GRK2, although small rotations of the RH and PH domains relative to the kinase domain are evident. Mutation of residues within the larger domain interfaces of GRK2 generally leads to diminished expression and activity, suggesting that these interfaces are important for stability and remain intact upon activation of GRK2. Geranylgeranylated Gbetagamma, but not a soluble mutant of Gbetagamma, protects GRK2 from clostripain digestion at a site within its kinase domain that is 80 A away from the Gbetagamma binding site. Equilibrium ultracentrifugation experiments indicate that neither abnormally large detergent micelles nor protein oligomerization can account for the observed protection. The Gbetagamma-mediated binding of GRK2 to CHAPS micelles or lipid bilayers therefore appears to rigidify the kinase domain, perhaps by encouraging stable contacts between the RH and kinase domains.     

Lipid-dependent targeting of G proteins into rafts

Domains rich in sphingolipids and cholesterol, or rafts, may organize signal transduction complexes at the plasma membrane. Raft lipids are believed to exist in a state similar to the liquid-ordered phase. It has been proposed that proteins with a high affinity for an ordered lipid environment will preferentially partition into rafts (Melkonian, K. A., Ostermeyer, A. G., Chen, J. Z., Roth, M. G., and Brown, D. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 3910-3917). We investigated the possibility that lipid-lipid interactions between lipid-modified proteins and raft lipids mediate targeting of proteins to these domains. G protein monomers or trimers were reconstituted in liposomes, engineered to mimic raft domains. Assay for partitioning of G proteins into rafts was based on Triton X-100 insolubility. Myristoylation and palmitoylation of Galpha(i) were necessary and sufficient for association with liposomes and partitioning into rafts. Strikingly, the amount of fatty-acylated Galpha(i) in rafts was significantly reduced when myristoylated Galpha(i) was thioacylated with cis-unsaturated fatty acids instead of saturated fatty acids such as palmitate. Prenylated betagamma subunits were excluded from rafts, whether reconstituted alone or with fatty-acylated alpha subunits. These results suggest that the structural difference between lipids that modify proteins is one basis for the selectivity of protein targeting to rafts.     

Signaling by a non-dissociated complex of G protein βγ and α subunits stimulated by a receptor-independent activator of G protein signaling, AGS8

Accumulating evidence suggests that heterotrimeric G protein activation may not require G protein subunit dissociation. Results presented here provide evidence for a subunit dissociation-independent mechanism for G protein activation by a receptor-independent activator of G protein signaling, AGS8. AGS8 is a member of the AGS group III family of AGS proteins thought to activate G protein signaling primarily through interactions with Gbetagamma subunits. Results are presented demonstrating that AGS8 binds to the effector and alpha subunit binding "hot spot" on Gbetagamma yet does not interfere with Galpha subunit binding to Gbetagamma or phospholipase C beta2 activation. AGS8 stimulates activation of phospholipase C beta2 by heterotrimeric Galphabetagamma and forms a quaternary complex with Galpha(i1), Gbeta(1)gamma(2), and phospholipase C beta2. AGS8 rescued phospholipase C beta binding and regulation by an inactive beta subunit with a mutation in the hot spot (beta(1)(W99A)gamma(2)) that normally prevents binding and activation of phospholipase C beta2. This demonstrates that, in the presence of AGS8, the hot spot is not used for Gbetagamma interactions with phospholipase C beta2. Mutation of an alternate binding site for phospholipase C beta2 in the amino-terminal coiled-coil region of Gbetagamma prevented AGS8-dependent phospholipase C binding and activation. These data implicate a mechanism for AGS8, and potentially other Gbetagamma binding proteins, for directing Gbetagamma signaling through alternative effector activation sites on Gbetagamma in the absence of subunit dissociation.     

A docking site for G protein βγ subunits on the parathyroid hormone 1 receptor supports signaling through multiple pathways

The G protein-coupled receptor for PTH and PTH-related protein (PTH1R) signals via many intracellular pathways. The purpose of this work is to investigate a G protein binding site on an intracellular domain of the PTH1R. The carboxy-terminal, cytoplasmic tail of the PTH1R fused to glutathione-S-transferase interacts with Gi/o proteins in vitro. All three subunits of the heterotrimer interact with the receptor C-tail. Activation of the heterotrimeric complex with GTPgammaS has no effect on Gbetagamma interactions, but markedly disrupts binding of the Galphai/o subunits to the receptor tail, suggesting that direct Gbetagamma binding indirectly links Galpha subunits to this region of the receptor. Gbetagamma subunits alone bind the C-tail with an affinity that is comparable to the heterotrimeric G protein complex. G protein complexes consisting of Galphashis6-beta1gamma2 and Galphaqhis6-beta1gamma2 also interact with the PTH1R tail in vitro. The Gbetagamma interaction domain is located on the juxta-membrane region of the tail between amino acids 468 and 491. Mutations that disrupt Gbetagamma interactions block PTH signaling via phospholipase Cbeta/[Ca2+]i and MAPK and markedly reduce signaling via adenylyl cyclase/cAMP. Herein, we define a domain on the PTH1R that is capable of binding G protein heterotrimeric complexes via direct Gbetagamma interactions.