Orientational preferences of neighboring helices can drive ER insertion of a marginally hydrophobic transmembrane helix

α-helical integral membrane proteins critically depend on the correct insertion of their transmembrane α helices into the lipid bilayer for proper folding, yet a surprisingly large fraction of the transmembrane α helices in multispanning integral membrane proteins are not sufficiently hydrophobic to insert into the target membrane by themselves. How can such marginally hydrophobic segments nevertheless form transmembrane helices in the folded structure? Here, we show that a transmembrane helix with a strong orientational preference (N(cyt)-C(lum) or N(lum)-C(cyt)) can both increase and decrease the hydrophobicity threshold for membrane insertion of a neighboring, marginally hydrophobic helix. This effect helps explain the "missing hydrophobicity" in polytopic membrane proteins.     

Interhelical hydrogen bonding drives strong interactions in membrane proteins

Polar residues in transmembrane alpha-helices may strongly influence the folding or association of integral membrane proteins. To test whether a motif that promotes helix association in a soluble protein could do the same within a membrane, we designed a model transmembrane helix based on the GCN4 leucine zipper. We found in both detergent micelles and biological membranes that helix association is driven strongly by asparagine, independent of the rest of the hydrophobic leucine and/or valine sequence. Hydrogen bonding between membrane helices gives stronger associations than the packing of surfaces in glycophorin A helices, creating an opportunity to stabilize structures, but also implying a danger that non-specific interactions might occur. Thus, membrane proteins may fold to avoid exposure of strongly hydrogen bonding groups at their lipid exposed surfaces.     

Transmembrane helix uniformity examined by spectral mapping of torsion angles

The environment and unique balance of molecular forces within lipid bilayers has a profound impact upon the structure, dynamics, and function of membrane proteins. We describe the biophysical foundations for the remarkable uniformity of many transmembrane helices that result from the molecular interactions within lipid bilayers. In fact, the characteristic uniformity of transmembrane helices leads to unique spectroscopic opportunities allowing for phi,psi torsion angles to be mapped directly onto solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) PISEMA spectra. Results from spectral simulations, the solid state NMR-derived structure of the influenza A M2 proton channel transmembrane domain, and high-resolution crystal structures of 27 integral membrane proteins demonstrate that transmembrane helices tend to be more uniform than previously thought. The results are discussed through the definition of a preferred range of backbone varphi,psi torsion angles for transmembrane alpha helices and are presented with respect to improving biophysical characterizations of integral membrane proteins.     

Current status of membrane protein structure classification

For over 2 decades, continuous efforts to organize the jungle of available protein structures have been underway. Although a number of discrepancies between different classification approaches for soluble proteins have been reported, the classification of membrane proteins has so far not been comparatively studied because of the limited amount of available structural data. Here, we present an analysis of α‐helical membrane protein classification in the SCOP and CATH databases. In the current set of 63 α‐helical membrane protein chains having between 1 and 13 transmembrane helices, we observed a number of differently classified proteins both regarding their domain and fold assignment. The majority of all discrepancies affect single transmembrane helix, two helix hairpin, and four helix bundle domains, while domains with more than five helices are mostly classified consistently between SCOP and CATH. It thus appears that the structural constraints imposed by the lipid bilayer complicate the classification of membrane proteins with only few membrane‐spanning regions. This problem seems to be specific for membrane proteins as soluble four helix bundles, not restrained by the membrane, are more consistently classified by SCOP and CATH. Our findings indicate that the structural space of small membrane helix bundles is highly continuous such that even minor differences in individual classification procedures may lead to a significantly different classification. Membrane proteins with few helices and limited structural diversity only seem to be reasonably classifiable if the definition of a fold is adapted to include more fine‐grained structural features such as helix–helix interactions and reentrant regions. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Interactions of alpha-helices with lipid bilayers: a review of simulation studies

Membrane proteins, of which the majority seem to contain one or more alpha-helix, constitute approx. 30% of most genomes. A complete understanding of the nature of helix/bilayer interactions is necessary for an understanding of the structural principles underlying membrane proteins. This review describes computer simulation studies of helix/bilayer interactions. Key experimental studies of the interactions of alpha-helices and lipid bilayers are briefly reviewed. Surface associated helices are found in some membrane-bound enzymes (e.g. prostaglandin synthase), and as stages in the mechanisms of antimicrobial peptides and of pore-forming bacterial toxins. Transmembrane alpha-helices are found in most integral membrane proteins, and also in channels formed by amphipathic peptides or by bacterial toxins. Mean field simulations, in which the lipid bilayer is approximated as a hydrophobic continuum, have been used in studies of membrane-active peptides (e.g. alamethicin, melittin, magainin and dermaseptin) and of simple membrane proteins (e.g. phage Pf1 coat protein). All atom molecular dynamics simulations of fully solvated bilayers with transmembrane helices have been applied to: the constituent helices of bacteriorhodopsin; peptide-16 (a simple model TM helix); and a number of pore-lining helices from ion channels. Surface associated helices (e.g. melittin and dermaseptin) have been simulated, as have alpha-helical bundles such as bacteriorhodopsin and alamethicin. From comparison of the results from the two classes of simulation, it emerges that a major theoretical challenge is to exploit the results of all atom simulations in order to improve the mean field approach.     

Structural features of transmembrane helices

A total of 160 transmembrane helices of 15 non-homologous high-resolution X-ray protein structures have been analyzed in respect of their structural features. The dihedral angles and hydrogen bonds of the helical sections that span the hydrophobic interior of the lipid bilayer have been investigated. The Ramachandran plot of protein channels and solute transporters exhibit a significant shift Delta (phi- and psi-angles) of Delta mean (+4.5 degrees and -5.4 degrees ), compared to a reference group of 151 alpha-helices of the same average length derived from water-soluble globular proteins. At the C-termini of transmembrane helices structural motifs equivalent to the Gly-caps of helices in globular proteins have been found, with two third of the transmembrane Gly-caps taking up a primary structure that is typically not found at helix termini exposed to a polar solvent. The structural particularities reported here are relevant for the three-dimensional modelling of membrane protein structures.     

Proline residues in transmembrane alpha helices affect the folding of bacteriorhodopsin

Proline residues occur frequently in transmembrane alpha helices, which contrasts with their behaviour as helix-breakers in water-soluble proteins. The three membrane-embedded proline residues of bacteriorhodopsin have been replaced individually by alanine and glycine to give P50A, or P50G on helix B, P91A, or P91G on helix C, and P186A or P186G on helix F, and the effect on the protein folding kinetics has been investigated. The rate-limiting apoprotein folding step, which results in formation of a seven transmembrane, alpha helical state, was slower than wild-type protein for the Pro50 and Pro91 mutants, regardless of whether they were mutated to Ala or Gly. These proline residues give rise to several inter-helix contacts, which are therefore important in folding to the seven transmembrane helix state. No evidence for cis-trans isomerisations of the peptidyl prolyl bonds was found during this rate-limiting apoprotein folding step. Mutations of all three membrane-embedded proline residues affected the subsequent retinal binding and final folding to bacteriorhodopsin, suggesting that these proline residues contribute to formation of the retinal binding pocket within the helix bundle, again via helix/helix interactions. These results point to proline residues in transmembrane alpha helices being important in the folding of integral membrane proteins. The helix/helix interactions and hydrogen bonds that arise from the presence of proline residues in transmembrane alpha helices can affect the formation of transmembrane alpha helix bundles as well as cofactor binding pockets.     

How important are transmembrane helices of bitopic membrane proteins?

The topology of a bitopic membrane protein consists of a single transmembrane helix connecting two extra-membranous domains. As opposed to helices from polytopic proteins, the transmembrane helices of bitopic proteins were initially considered as merely hydrophobic anchors, while more recent studies have begun to shed light on their role in the protein's function. Herein the overall importance of transmembrane helices from bitopic membrane proteins was analyzed using a relative conservation analysis. Interestingly, the transmembrane domains of bitopic proteins are on average, significantly more conserved than the remainder of the protein, even when taking into account their smaller amino acid repertoire. Analysis of highly conserved transmembrane domains did not reveal any unifying consensus, pointing to a great diversity in their conservation patterns. However, Fourier power spectrum analysis was able to show that regardless of the conservation motif, in most sequences a significant conservation moment was observed, in that one side of the helix was conserved while the other was not. Taken together, it may be possible to conclude that a significant proportion of transmembrane helices from bitopic membrane proteins participate in specific interactions, in a variety of modes in the plane of the lipid bilayer.     

How important are transmembrane helices of bitopic membrane proteins?

The topology of a bitopic membrane protein consists of a single transmembrane helix connecting two extra-membranous domains. As opposed to helices from polytopic proteins, the transmembrane helices of bitopic proteins were initially considered as merely hydrophobic anchors, while more recent studies have begun to shed light on their role in the protein's function. Herein the overall importance of transmembrane helices from bitopic membrane proteins was analyzed using a relative conservation analysis. Interestingly, the transmembrane domains of bitopic proteins are on average, significantly more conserved than the remainder of the protein, even when taking into account their smaller amino acid repertoire. Analysis of highly conserved transmembrane domains did not reveal any unifying consensus, pointing to a great diversity in their conservation patterns. However, Fourier power spectrum analysis was able to show that regardless of the conservation motif, in most sequences a significant conservation moment was observed, in that one side of the helix was conserved while the other was not. Taken together, it may be possible to conclude that a significant proportion of transmembrane helices from bitopic membrane proteins participate in specific interactions, in a variety of modes in the plane of the lipid bilayer.     

Sequence and conformational preferences at termini of α‐helices in membrane proteins: Role of the helix environment

α‐helices are amongst the most common secondary structural elements seen in membrane proteins and are packed in the form of helix bundles. These α‐helices encounter varying external environments (hydrophobic, hydrophilic) that may influence the sequence preferences at their N and C‐termini. The role of the external environment in stabilization of the helix termini in membrane proteins is still unknown. Here we analyze α‐helices in a high‐resolution dataset of integral α‐helical membrane proteins and establish that their sequence and conformational preferences differ from those in globular proteins. We specifically examine these preferences at the N and C‐termini in helices initiating/terminating inside the membrane core as well as in linkers connecting these transmembrane helices. We find that the sequence preferences and structural motifs at capping (Ncap and Ccap) and near‐helical (N' and C') positions are influenced by a combination of features including the membrane environment and the innate helix initiation and termination property of residues forming structural motifs. We also find that a large number of helix termini which do not form any particular capping motif are stabilized by formation of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions contributed from the neighboring helices in the membrane protein. We further validate the sequence preferences obtained from our analysis with data from an ultradeep sequencing study that identifies evolutionarily conserved amino acids in the rat neurotensin receptor. The results from our analysis provide insights for the secondary structure prediction, modeling and design of membrane proteins. Proteins 2014; 82:3420–3436. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Marginally hydrophobic transmembrane α‐helices shaping membrane protein folding

Cells have developed an incredible machinery to facilitate the insertion of membrane proteins into the membrane. While we have a fairly good understanding of the mechanism and determinants of membrane integration, more data is needed to understand the insertion of membrane proteins with more complex insertion and folding pathways. This review will focus on marginally hydrophobic transmembrane helices and their influence on membrane protein folding. These weakly hydrophobic transmembrane segments are by themselves not recognized by the translocon and therefore rely on local sequence context for membrane integration. How can such segments reside within the membrane? We will discuss this in the light of features found in the protein itself as well as the environment it resides in. Several characteristics in proteins have been described to influence the insertion of marginally hydrophobic helices. Additionally, the influence of biological membranes is significant. To begin with, the actual cost for having polar groups within the membrane may not be as high as expected; the presence of proteins in the membrane as well as characteristics of some amino acids may enable a transmembrane helix to harbor a charged residue. The lipid environment has also been shown to directly influence the topology as well as membrane boundaries of transmembrane helices—implying a dynamic relationship between membrane proteins and their environment.     

Crosslinking between alpha and beta subunits defines the orientation and spatial relationship of some of the transmembrane helices of the proton-translocating pyridine nucleotide transhydrogenase of Escherichia coli

The proton-translocating pyridine nucleotide transhydrogenase of Escherichia coli is composed of two types of subunits, alpha and beta, organized as an alpha(2)beta(2) tetramer. The protein contains three recognizable domains, of which domain II is the transmembrane region of the molecule containing the pathway for proton translocation. Domain II is composed of four transmembrane helices at the carboxyl-terminus of the alpha subunit and either eight or nine transmembrane helices at the amino-terminal region of the beta subunit. We have introduced pairs of cysteine residues into a cysteine-free transhydrogenase by site-directed mutagenesis. Disulfide bond formation between some of these cysteine residues occurred spontaneously or on treatment with cupric 1, 10-phenanthrolinate. Analysis of crosslinked products confirmed that there are nine transmembrane helices in the domain II region of the beta subunit. The proximity to one another of several of the transmembrane helices was determined. Thus, helices 2 and 4 are close to helix 6 (nomenclature of Meuller and Rydstr?m, J. Biol. Chem. 274, 19072-19080, 1999), and helix 3 and the carboxyl-terminal eight residues of the alpha subunit are close to helix 7. In the alpha(2)beta(2) tetramer, helices 2 and 4 of one alpha subunit are close to the same pair of transmembrane helices of the other alpha subunit, and helix 6 of one beta subunit is close to helix 6 of the other beta subunit.     

Functional competition within a membrane: Lipid recognition vs. transmembrane helix oligomerization

Binding of specific lipids to large, polytopic membrane proteins is well described, and it is clear that such lipids are crucial for protein stability and activity. In contrast, binding of defined lipid species to individual transmembrane helices and regulation of transmembrane helix monomer–oligomer equilibria by binding of distinct lipids is a concept, which has emerged only lately. Lipids bind to single-span membrane proteins, both in the juxta-membrane region as well as in the hydrophobic membrane core. While some interactions counteract transmembrane helix oligomerization, in other cases lipid binding appears to enhance oligomerization. As reversible oligomerization is involved in activation of many membrane proteins, binding of defined lipids to single-span transmembrane proteins might be a mechanism to regulate and/or fine-tune the protein activity. But how could lipid binding trigger the activity of a protein? How can binding of a single lipid molecule to a transmembrane helix affect the structure of a transmembrane helix oligomer, and consequently its signaling state? These questions are discussed in the present article based on recent results obtained with simple, single-span transmembrane proteins. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Lipid–protein interactions.     

Molecular packing and packing defects in helical membrane proteins

The packing of helices spanning lipid bilayers is crucial for the stability and function of alpha-helical membrane proteins. Using a modified Voronoi procedure, we calculated packing densities for helix-helix contacts in membrane spanning domains. Our results show that the transmembrane helices of protein channels and transporters are significantly more loosely packed compared with helices in globular proteins. The observed packing deficiencies of these membrane proteins are also reflected by a higher amount of cavities at functionally important sites. The cavities positioned along the gated pores of membrane channels and transporters are noticeably lined by polar amino acids that should be exposed to the aqueous medium when the protein is in the open state. In contrast, nonpolar amino acids surround the cavities in those protein regions where large rearrangements are supposed to take place, as near the hinge regions of transporters or at restriction sites of protein channels. We presume that the observed deficiencies of helix-helix packing are essential for the helical mobility that sustains the function of many membrane protein channels and transporters.     

Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing

The packing structures of transmembrane helices are traditionally attributed to patterns in residues along the contact surface. In this view, besides keeping the helices confined in the membrane, the bilayer has only a minor effect on the helices structure. Here, we use two different approaches to show that the lipid environment has a crucial effect in determining the cross-angle distribution of packed helices. We analyzed structural data of a membrane proteins database. We show that the distribution of cross angles of helix pairs in this database is statistically indistinguishable from the cross-angle distribution of two noninteracting helices imbedded in the membrane. These results suggest that the cross angle is, to a large extent, determined by the tilt angle of the individual helices. We test this hypothesis using molecular simulations of a coarse-grained model that contains no specific residue interactions. These simulations reproduce the same cross-angle distribution as found in the database. As the tilt angle of a helix is dominated by hydrophobic mismatch between the protein and surrounding lipids, our results indicate that hydrophobic mismatch is the dominant factor guiding the transmembrane helix packing. Other short-range forces might then fine-tune the structure to its final configuration.     

Conformations of proline residues in membrane environments

Although noted as hydrophilic residues with helix-breaking potential, proline residues are observed in putatively alpha-helical transmembrane (TM) segments of many channel-forming integral membrane proteins. In addition to the recognized property of X-Pro peptide bonds (where X = any amino acid) to occur in cis as well as trans isomeric states, the tertiary amide character of the X-Pro bond confers increased propensity for involvement of its carbonyl group in specific H-bonded structures (e.g., beta- and gamma-turns) and/or liganding interactions with positively charged species. To examine this latter situation in further detail, we identified Leu-Pro-Phe as a consensus sequence triad based on actual occurrences of intramembranous Pro residues in transport protein TM segments. Accordingly, we have undertaken the synthesis of hydrophobic peptides with potential membrane affinity, of which t-butyloxycarbonyl-L-Ala-L-Ala-L-Ala-L-Leu-L-Pro-L-Phe-OH (t-Boc-AAALPF-OH) is an initial compound. Partitioning of this peptide into model membrane environments composed of lipid micelles induces specific conformation(s) for the membrane-bound hexapeptide, as monitored by 75-MHz 13C-nmr spectral behavior of 13C-enriched Leu and Pro carbonyl carbons, and by 300-MHz 1H-nmr spectra of peptide alpha, beta, and aromatic protons. Data are interpreted in terms of an intramolecularly H-bonded inverse gamma-turn conformation in the membrane environment involving the Leu-Pro-Phe triad. The inherent structural instability of a Pro-containing segment in a TM helix due to the multiplicity of possible local conformations is discussed as a functional aspect of membrane-buried prolines in transport proteins.     

Dynamic regulation of lipid–protein interactions

We review the importance of helix motions for the function of several important categories of membrane proteins and for the properties of several model molecular systems. For voltage-gated potassium or sodium channels, sliding, tilting and/or rotational movements of the S4 helix accompanied by a swapping of cognate side-chain ion-pair interactions regulate the channel gating. In the seven-helix G protein-coupled receptors, exemplified by the rhodopsins, collective helix motions serve to activate the functional signaling. Peptides which initially associate with lipid-bilayer membrane surfaces may undergo dynamic transitions from surface-bound to tilted-transmembrane orientations, sometimes accompanied by changes in the molecularity, formation of a pore or, more generally, the activation of biological function. For single-span membrane proteins, such as the tyrosine kinases, an interplay between juxtamembrane and transmembrane domains is likely to be crucial for the regulation of dimer assembly that in turn is associated with the functional responses to external signals. Additionally, we note that experiments with designed single-span transmembrane helices offer fundamental insights into the molecular features that govern protein–lipid interactions.This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Lipid–protein interactions.     

Modeling of the structural features of integral-membrane proteins reverse-environment prediction of integral membrane protein structure (REPIMPS)

The Profiles-3D application, an inverse-folding methodology appropriate for water-soluble proteins, has been modified to allow the determination of structural properties of integral-membrane proteins (IMPs) and for testing the validity of solved and model structures of IMPs. The modification, known as reverse-environment prediction of integral membrane protein structure (REPIMPS), takes into account the fact that exposed areas of side chains for many residues in IMPs are in contact with lipid and not the aqueous phase. This (1) allows lipid-exposed residues to be classified into the correct physicochemical environment class, (2) significantly improves compatibility scores for IMPs whose structures have been solved, and (3) reduces the possibility of rejecting a three-dimensional structure for an IMP because the presence of lipid was not included. Validation tests of REPIMPS showed that it (1) can locate the transmembrane domain of IMPs with single transmembrane helices more frequently than a range of other methodologies, (2) can rotationally orient transmembrane helices with respect to the lipid environment and surrounding helices in IMPs with multiple transmembrane helices, and (3) has the potential to accurately locate transmembrane domains in IMPs with multiple transmembrane helices. We conclude that correcting for the presence of the lipid environment surrounding the transmembrane segments of IMPs is an essential step for reasonable modeling and verification of the three-dimensional structures of these proteins.     

Determination of the border between the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of human integrin subunits

In this study we have determined the position of the C-terminal end of the transmembrane domains of human integrin subunits (alpha2, alpha5, beta1, beta2) in microsomal membranes using the glycosylation mapping technique. In contrast to the common view, the transmembrane helices were found to extend roughly to Phe(1129) in alpha2, to Phe(1026) in alpha5, to Ile(757) in beta1, and to His(728) in beta2. The alpha-carbon of the conserved lysine present near the C-terminal end of the transmembrane helix (Lys(1125) in alpha2, Lys(1022) in alpha5, Lys(752) in beta1, and Lys(724) in beta2) is buried in the plasma membrane, and the charged amino group most likely reaches into the polar head-group region of the lipid bilayer. A possible role for the conserved lysine in integrin function is discussed.     

Topology and immersion depth of an integral membrane protein by paramagnetic rates from dissolved oxygen

In studies of membrane proteins, knowledge of protein topology can provide useful insight into both structure and function. In this work, we present a solution NMR method for the measurement the tilt angle and average immersion depth of alpha helices in membrane proteins, from analysis of the paramagnetic relaxation rate enhancements arising from dissolved oxygen. No modification to the micelle or protein is necessary, and the topology of both transmembrane and amphipathic helices are readily determined. We apply this method to the measure the topology of a monomeric mutant of phospholamban (AFA-PLN), a 52-residue membrane protein containing both an amphipathic and a transmembrane alpha helix. In dodecylphosphocholine micelles, the amphipathic helix of AFA-PLN was found to have a tilt angle of 87° ± 1° and an average immersion depth of 13.2 ?. The transmembrane helix was found to have an average immersion depth of 5.4 ?, indicating residues 41 and 42 are closest to the micelle centre. The resolution of paramagnetic relaxation rate enhancements from dissolved oxygen compares favourably to those from Ni (II), a hydrophilic paramagnetic species.