Effect of antiestrogens and aromatase inhibitor on basal growth of the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 in serum-free medium

Antiestrogens are efficient inhibitors of estrogen-mediated growth of human breast cancer. Besides inhibiting estradiol-stimulated growth, antiestrogens may have a direct growth-inhibitory effect on estrogen receptor (ER) positive cells and thus be more efficient than aromatase inhibitors, which will only abrogate estrogen-dependent tumor growth. To address this issue, we have used the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7/S9 as a model system which is maintained in a chemically defined medium without serum and estrogen. The addition of estradiol results in an increase in cell growth rate. Thus, the MCF-7/S9 cell line is estrogen-responsive but not estrogen-dependent. Three different types of antiestrogens, namely tamoxifen, ICI 182,780 and EM-652 were found to exert a significant and dose-dependent inhibition of basal growth of MCF-7/S9 cells. The growth-inhibitory effect of the three antiestrogens was prevented by simultaneous estradiol treatment. Antiestrogen treatment also reduced the basal pS2 mRNA expression level, thus indicating spontaneous estrogenic activity in the cells. However, treatment with the aromatase inhibitor had no effect on basal cell growth, excluding that endogenous estrogen synthesis is involved in basal growth. These data demonstrate that in addition to their estrogen antagonistic effect, antiestrogens have a direct growth-inhibitory effect which is ER-mediated. Consequently, in the subset of ER positive breast cancer patients with estrogen-independent tumor growth, antiestrogen therapy may be superior to treatment with aromatase inhibitors which only inhibit estrogen formation but do not affect cancer cell growth in the absence of estrogens.     

Role of TGF-β signaling in the mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance

The transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling pathway plays complex role in the regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation in breast cancer. TGF-β activation can lead to multiple cellular responses mediating the drug resistance evolution, including the resistance to antiestrogens. Tamoxifen is the most commonly prescribed antiestrogen that functionally involved in regulation of TGF-β activity. In this review, we focus on the role of TGF-β signaling in the mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance, including its interaction with estrogen receptors alfa (ERα) pathway and breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs). We summarize the current reported data regarding TGF-β signaling components as markers of tamoxifen resistance and review current approaches to overcoming tamoxifen resistance based on studies of TGF-β signaling.     

Estrogen receptor-alpha 36 mediates mitogenic antiestrogen signaling in ER-negative breast cancer cells

It is prevailingly thought that the antiestrogens tamoxifen and ICI 182, 780 are competitive antagonists of the estrogen-binding site of the estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-α). However, a plethora of evidence demonstrated both antiestrogens exhibit agonist activities in different systems such as activation of the membrane-initiated signaling pathways. The mechanisms by which antiestrogens mediate estrogen-like activities have not been fully established. Previously, a variant of ER-α, EP-α36, has been cloned and showed to mediate membrane-initiated estrogen and antiestrogen signaling in cells only expressing ER-α36. Here, we investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying the antiestrogen signaling in ER-negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-436 cells that express high levels of endogenous ER-α36. We found that the effects of both 4-hydoxytamoxifen (4-OHT) and ICI 182, 780 (ICI) exhibited a non-monotonic, or biphasic dose response curve; antiestrogens at low concentrations, elicited a mitogenic signaling pathway to stimulate cell proliferation while at high concentrations, antiestrogens inhibited cell growth. Antiestrogens at l nM induced the phosphorylation of the Src-Y416 residue, an event to activate Src, while at 5 μM induced Src-Y527 phosphorylation that inactivates Src. Antiestrogens at 1 nM also induced phosphorylation of the MAPK/ERK and activated the Cyclin D1 promoter activity through the Src/EGFR/STAT5 pathways but not at 5 μM. Knock-down of ER-α36 abrogated the biphasic antiestrogen signaling in these cells. Our results thus indicated that ER-α36 mediates biphasic antiestrogen signaling in the ER-negative breast cancer cells and Src functions as a switch of antiestrogen signaling dependent on concentrations of antiestrogens through the EGFR/STAT5 pathway.     

Synthesis and structure–activity relationships of analogs of EM-652 (acolbifene), a pure selective estrogen receptor modulator. Study of nitrogen substitution

EM-652 (acolbifene) analogs have been synthesized as selective estrogen receptor modulators. Substitution on the nitrogen atom of these 2H-1-benzopyran derivatives has been studied for its influence on antiestrogenic activity. Binding to the rat estrogen receptor, inhibition of estradiol-stimulated proliferation of T-47D breast cancer cells, as well as antiuterotrophic and uterotrophic activities in ovariectomized mice have been evaluated. 2H-1-Benzopyran 1b (EM-343, racemic form of EM-652), which contains a piperidine ring, shows the best pharmacological profile; RBA=380, IC₅₀value=0.110?nM (in T-47D cells), as well as 63% and 84% antiuterotrophic inhibitions at the 7.5 and 75?nmol doses, respectively.     

Synthesis and biological evaluation of stilbene-based pure estrogen antagonists

Replacement of one of the ethyl substituents in diethylstilbestrol by side chains with functional groups converted this potent estrogen into pure antiestrogens with the potential for the treatment of breast cancer. These agents completely suppressed estrogen receptor-mediated gene activation and inhibited the growth of estrogen-sensitive MCF-7 breast cancer cells in submicromolar concentrations. The most potent derivative displayed similar activity as fulvestrant (ICI 182,780) in vitro and in the mouse uterine weight test. Obviously, the stilbene structure can act as a substitute for estradiol in the development of pure estrogen antagonists.     

Protein kinase D1 regulates ERα‐positive breast cancer cell growth response to 17β‐estradiol and contributes to poor prognosis in patients

About 70% of human breast cancers express and are dependent for growth on estrogen receptor α (ERα), and therefore are sensitive to antiestrogen therapies. However, progression to an advanced, more aggressive phenotype is associated with acquisition of resistance to antiestrogens and/or invasive potential. In this study, we highlight the role of the serine/threonine‐protein kinase D1 (PKD1) in ERα‐positive breast cancers. Growth of ERα‐positive MCF‐7 and MDA‐MB‐415 human breast cancer cells was assayed in adherent or anchorage‐independent conditions in cells overexpressing or depleted for PKD1. PKD1 induces cell growth through both an ERα‐dependent manner, by increasing ERα expression and cell sensitivity to 17β‐estradiol, and an ERα‐independent manner, by reducing cell dependence to estrogens and conferring partial resistance to antiestrogen ICI 182,780. PKD1 knockdown in MDA‐MB‐415 cells strongly reduced estrogen‐dependent and independent invasion. Quantification of PKD1 mRNA levels in 38 cancerous and non‐cancerous breast cell lines and in 152 ERα‐positive breast tumours from patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen showed an association between PKD1 and ERα expression in 76.3% (29/38) of the breast cell lines tested and a strong correlation between PKD1 expression and invasiveness (P < 0.0001). In tamoxifen‐treated patients, tumours with high PKD1 mRNA levels (n = 77, 50.66%) were significantly associated with less metastasis‐free survival than tumours with low PKD1 mRNA expression (n = 75, 49.34%; P = 0.031). Moreover, PKD1 mRNA levels are strongly positively associated with EGFR and vimentin levels (P < 0.0000001). Thus, our study defines PKD1 as a novel attractive prognostic factor and a potential therapeutic target in breast cancer.     

Control of the estrogen-like actions of the tamoxifen-estrogen receptor complex by the surface amino acid at position 351

Tamoxifen is a valuable therapeutic agent with applications in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. However, the development of drug resistance limits the usefulness of tamoxifen therapy. One form of drug resistance in breast cancer is tamoxifen-stimulated growth. We have addressed a mechanism how the tamoxifen–estrogen receptor (ER) complex can convert from being a blocking to stimulatory signal in breast cancer. We have described an effective assay system to study the action of antiestrogen–ER complex through the activation of transforming growth factor alpha gene in situ. The MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were stably transfected with cDNAs for wtER (D351), mutant Asp351Tyr ER (D351Y) and mutant Asp351Gly ER (D351G). The D351Y ER can enhance the estrogenic properties of 4OHT and change the pharmacology of raloxifene by converting it from antiestrogen to estrogen. We hypothesized that alterations in the charge of amino acid (aa) 351, and changes in the interaction with the side chain of an antiestrogen, are critical for the subsequent estrogenicity of the complex. Our goal was (1) to modulate the estrogenicity of the antiestrogen–ER complex by different aa substitutions at position 351 and (2) to examine the role of alterations in the side chain of antiestrogens on the estrogenicity of the complex. Substitution of tyrosine for aspartate at aa351 results in increased estrogenicity for a series of tamoxifen derivatives–ER complexes and the conversion of EM 652-ER and GW 7604-ER complexes from antiestrogenic to estrogen-like. Substitution of glycine for aspartate at aa 351 results in the conversion of 4OHT-ER complex from estrogen-like to antiestrogenic. We propose that the side chain of antiestrogens either neutralizes or displaces the charge at aspartate 351 thereby removing a charged site for the opportunistic binding of a novel coactivator. If no charge is present (D351G) then no coactivator can bind and the complex with any antiestrogen is not estrogen-like. However, if the charge is extended beyond the reach of an antiestrogen side chain (D351Y), then the coactivators bind and compounds are estrogen-like. The establishment of a relationship between the structure of the antiestrogen–ER complex and its function will enhance the development of novel compounds with unique biological activities and potentially avoid premature drug resistance.     

The effect of antiestrogens on the nuclear binding of the estrogen receptor

Experiments were designed to determine whether or not various antiestrogens in direct competition with estradiol-17β (E₂) would inhibit the translocation of the estrogen receptor complex from the cytoplasm to nuclei in rat uterine tissue. Incubation of the antiestrogens CI-628, $\text{cis}$-clomiphene, U-11,100A and MER-25 with rat uteri caused the nuclear uptake of the antiestrogen receptor complex which was greatest for most antiestrogens at concentrations of 1 × 10^?6 to 1 × 10^?5M. At higher concentrations of CI-628, $\text{cis}$-clomiphene, and U-11,100A the nuclear binding of the antiestrogen receptor complex was greatly decreased. Incubation of the antiestrogens with E₂ resulted in a dramatic inhibition of the nuclear uptake of the estrogen receptor. $\text{Trans}$-clomiphene, a weak estrogen, did not inhibit the movement of the uterine cytoplasmic receptor into the nuclear fraction.     

Absence of correlation between antiestrogenic activity and binding affinity for the estrogen receptor.

We have compared the binding to the estrogen receptor (R) of different androgens and antiestrogens with their antiestrogenic activities on uterine growth. We found that estradiol (E₂)¹ and hydroxytamoxifen, a potent antiestrogen, displayed the same affinity for R. Conversely, androgens which have a much lower affinity for R and a much higher dissociation rate than E₂, behave at high doses as full estrogens, with no significant antiestrogenic activity. We conclude that there is no correlation between the dissociation rate from R and the antiestrogenic activity of R ligands and that one cannot discriminate between estrogen and antiestrogen ligands by simply evaluating their $\text{in vitro}$ binding to the cytosol R.     

Functional ablation of pRb activates Cdk2 and causes antiestrogen resistance in human breast cancer cells

Estrogens are required for the proliferation of hormone dependent breast cancer cells, making estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors amenable to endocrine therapies such as antiestrogens. However, resistance to these agents remains a significant cause of treatment failure. We previously demonstrated that inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) family tumor suppressors causes antiestrogen resistance in MCF-7 cells, a widely studied model of estrogen responsive human breast cancers. In this study, we investigate the mechanism by which pRb inactivation leads to antiestrogen resistance. Cdk4 and cdk2 are two key cell cycle regulators that can phosphorylate and inactivate pRb, therefore we tested whether these kinases are required in cells lacking pRb function. pRb family members were inactivated in MCF-7 cells by expressing polyomavirus large tumor antigen (PyLT), and cdk activity was inhibited using the cdk inhibitors p16(INK4A) and p21(Waf1/Cip1). Cdk4 activity was no longer required in cells lacking functional pRb, while cdk2 activity was required for proliferation in both the presence and absence of pRb function. Using inducible PyLT cell lines, we further demonstrated that pRb inactivation leads to increased cyclin A expression, cdk2 activation and proliferation in antiestrogen arrested cells. These results demonstrate that antiestrogens do not inhibit cdk2 activity or proliferation of MCF-7 cells in the absence of pRb family function, and suggest that antiestrogen resistant breast cancer cells resulting from pRb pathway inactivation would be susceptible to therapies that target cdk2.