Reduction mammaplasty with the "owl" incision and no undermining

Reduction mammaplasty has traditionally been done using the Wise pattern of incision. Because of the box-like effect in breast shape, the lack of projection, and the long scars associated with the inverted T incision, two techniques have emerged as alternatives: the vertical reduction of Lassus/Lejour and the "round block" periareolar technique popularized by Benelli. Each of these techniques has its pros and cons.The "owl" incision combines the features of the large periareolar reduction (Benelli's) and the vertical reduction (Lassus/Lejour); the horizontal inframammary scar is either made very short or completely eliminated. Volume reduction is done through a heart-shaped parenchymal resection, leaving the nipple-areolar complex over a supero-central pedicle. Maintenance of the central parenchyma behind the nipple-areolar complex and mobilization of the vertical pillars toward the center of the breast give excellent projection and diminish the lateral fullness. Enlargement of the periareolar skin resection diminishes the length and pleating of the vertical scar; conversely, inclusion of the vertical component to the periareolar technique eliminates the pleating effect of the periareolar incision. The short horizontal excision eliminates any resultant "dog ears" in the new inframammary fold. Thus, the discrepancy in the length of scars is better distributed. There is no skin or parenchymal undermining, so drains are not needed. Excellent results are obtained immediately on the operating table, and large volumes of glandular resection and correction of severe ptosis can be accomplished without compromising vascularity of either the nipple-areolar complex or the skin flaps.Ninety-four patients in a 7-year period were operated upon using this technique. Seventy-two had bilateral reductions up to 1900 gm per breast, 12 had unilateral reduction for symmetry following breast reconstruction, and 10 were patients with severe ptosis. Complications were rare and of a minor nature. No conversion to free grafts was done, even in the larger resections. One case required minor revision under local anesthesia, one case required bilateral re-reduction, and another case required unilateral re-reduction for continued growth of breast tissue. Almost 90 percent of the patients underwent procedures as outpatients.The owl-type incision and the supero-central pedicle flap are elements of a reduction mammaplasty technique that provides excellent projection and shape with minimal visible scars. It takes advantage of the positive features of the periareolar and vertical reduction techniques and minimizes their negative features. The new design of parenchymal resection improves the vascularity of the residual flaps. Additionally, it may better preserve the sensation to the nipple-areolar complex and lactation is not compromised.     

Outcome study: periareolar mammaplasty patients' perspective

Residual scars on occasion compromise patient satisfaction with breast reduction procedures. Periareolar breast reduction was proposed to minimize the scarring produced by the operation. This technique was criticized predominantly for producing a breast with low projection, for recurrence of ptosis after surgery, and for widening of the periareolar scar. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction from this technique. In the first branch of the study, 11 patients who had periareolar or circumareolar breast reduction were compared with 13 patients who had vertical scar reduction mammaplasty. The groups were matched for patient's age, size of reduction, and follow-up period. The patients were contacted by phone and requested to comment on four aspects of their operation: breast size, symmetry, quality of scars, and appearance and position of the nipple-areola complex. The replies were converted to numerical values and analyzed statistically. A panel of three women, prospective patients for breast reduction, were presented with standardized five-view before-and-after photographs and requested to score the results using the same criteria. Their responses were analyzed in the same manner. Both phases of the study produced similar results. Breast reduction done through a periareolar scar scored higher than a vertical scar technique. The operation did not differ with respect to shape, symmetry, or nipple-areola shape but did with respect to dissatisfaction with scars, which affected the overall result. This experimental model of assessing results of cosmetic operations is proposed as a tool to assess the patient's rather than the surgeon's perspective of a surgical technique, and it could find application in assessing other cosmetic operations.     

Cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery in blacks

Black women have not embraced cosmetic and reconstructive surgery of the breast with the same enthusiasm as their Caucasian counterparts because of fear of hypertrophic scars. The authors offer suggestions on how to minimize the scarring associated with breast surgery in black women. They feel that intraareolar incisions should be used whenever circumareolar incisions are indicated in augmentation mammaplasty, because the areola, being a favored area, is less likely to produce hypertrophic scars. The Marchac technique of reduction mammaplasty is recommended because it produces a short horizontal scar of 5 to 8 cm confined to the breast without medial and lateral extension, which may hypertrophy in black women. In the reduction of large breasts, secondary excision of dogears 6 or more weeks after mammaplasty reduces the medial and lateral extents of the scar. The use of liposuction as an adjunct to reduction mammaplasty may also accomplish the same thing. Amputation and free nipple-areola grafting should be used with caution in black patients because of the tendency of the grafted areola to hypopigment. In postmastectomy reconstruction, the authors suggest that the techniques described by Ryan and Radovan should be considered first before the techniques of reconstruction utilizing myocutaneous flaps. In these procedures, no new scars which may hypertrophy are created away from the site of reconstruction. Staples should not be used in skin closure in blacks because they cause cross-hatching of the wound even when removed early.     

Dermal suspension flap in vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty

Reduction mammaplasty has the following goals: appropriate reduction of breast size, symmetric and youthful breast shape, minimal and inconspicuous scars, and stable, long-term results. Although the first two parameters can be obtained by various reduction techniques, vertical-scar mammaplasty eliminates the horizontal inframammary scar, thereby reducing total scar length. Dermal flaps have been described in various types of reduction mammaplasty. The refinement of the authors' method is the incorporation of a superiorly pedicled dermal flap for better and longer-lasting support in vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty. A total of 73 vertical breast reductions in 38 patients were performed with this technique from May of 1996 to November of 1999. Vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty with a dermal suspension flap combines minimal scars with an internal support for long-term stability of the breast shape.     

Current trends in breast reduction

Results of our study describe the long term effects of reduction mammaplasty. Many women with excessively small or large breasts have an altered personal self-image and often suffer from low self-esteem and other psychological stresses. This procedure is designed to reduce and reshape large breasts, and since the size, shape, and symmetry of a woman's breasts can have a profound effect on her mental and physical well-being it is important to observe the patient's long-term outcome. Currently, breast reduction surgery is safe, effective and beneficial to the patient. In Croatia, reduction mammoplasty is often excluded from the general health care plan. The distinction between "reconstructive" versus "cosmetic" breast surgery is very well defined by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Board of Directors. Unfortunately, the Croatian Health Society has yet to standardize such a distinction. There is an imperative need for evidence-based selection criteria. We retrospectively analyzed data of 59 female patients suffering from symptomatic macromastia who underwent reduction mammaplasty over a 16 year period (1995 until 2011). Our aim was to compare and contrast the various techniques available for reduction mammaplasty and to determine, based on patient outcome and satisfaction, which technique is most suited for each patient. The results of our study generally reinforce the observation that reduction mammaplasty significantly provides improvements in health status, long-term quality of life, postsurgical breast appearance and significantly decrease physical symptoms of pain. A number of 59 consecutive cases were initially treated with the four different breast reduction techniques: inverted-T scat or Wisa pattern breast reduction, vertical reduction mammaplasty, simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty, inferior pedicle and free nipple graft techniques. The average clinical follow-up period was 6-months, and included 48 patients. The statistical analysis of the postoperative patient complications revealed a significant positive relationship in regards to smoking. The majority of these complications were wound related, with no significant relationship between patient complications and variables such as age, BMI, ASA score, resection weight of breast parenchyma, nipple elevation, duration of surgery, and type of pedicle. The higher number of complication correlated with a lower volume of parenchyma resection (rho=-0.321). Overall satisfaction with the new breast size (79%), appearance of the postoperative scars (87%), overall cosmetic outcome score (91%), overall outcome (100%), psychosocial outcome (46%), sexual outcome (85%), physical outcome (88%), satisfaction with preoperative information data (92%), and finally satisfaction with overall care process (96%) was calculated. As expected, the physical symptoms disappeared or were minimized in 88% of patients. Each method of breast reduction has its advantages and disadvantages. The surgeon should evaluate each patient's desires on the basis of her physical presentation. Breast reduction surgery increases the overall personal and social health; not only for the patient, but for their family and friends as well. It is an imperative that every surgeon is aware of this, in order to provide the highest level of care and quality to their patients.     

Subfascial periareolar augmentation mammaplasty

Subfascial placement of implants was introduced 3 years ago. Collected data reveal very promising short-term and long-term results in comparison with subglandular and subpectoral positioned implants. The clinical experiences of 69 breast augmentations in the subfascial position are reported. The indications for this technique are proposed. The incidence of complications is described from clinical experiences and compared with that for other methods. From January of 1998 through May of 2002, 328 patients underwent periareolar augmentation mammaplasty; 105 patients had a subglandular mammaplasty, 154 patients had a subpectoral mammaplasty, and from August of 1999 through May of 2002, 69 patients had a subfascial augmentation mammaplasty. The mean postoperative follow-up time was 3.6 years in the subglandular group, 3.5 years in the subpectoral group, and 2.9 years in the subfascial group. In comparing the results of the subglandular augmentation group with those of the subpectoral and subfascial augmentation groups, the total rate of complications diminished significantly. The long-term complications of severe capsular contracture, rippling, and nipple sensation and numbness in subglandular augmentation mammaplasty could be significantly reduced (p < 0.05). The subfascial augmentation mammaplasty unites all the advantages of the subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty but eliminates the disadvantages of increased postoperative discomfort and disturbing muscle movement of the breast.     

Secondary reduction mammaplasty: is using a different pedicle safe?

Reduction mammaplasty is a frequently performed procedure and one with consistent patient satisfaction. Few patients present for revisional procedures, and even fewer present for a secondary or repeated reduction mammaplasty. This study defines secondary reduction mammaplasty as performing an additional reduction using a pedicled nipple-areola complex. Few reports of secondary reduction are found in the literature. Operative guidelines for secondary reduction mammaplasty have been published recently. However, the experience of others has differed from these guidelines, and herein is presented another experience with secondary reduction mammaplasty. Ten cases of secondary reduction over a 37-year period were identified and reviewed. The initial reductions were performed using six different techniques. An average of 307 g of tissue per breast (range, 130 to 552 g) was removed at the initial operations. The secondary reductions were performed using four different techniques, and an average of 458 g of tissue per breast (range, 147 to 700 g) was removed at the secondary operations. Three of the 10 patients underwent initial and secondary reduction with the same technique. An average of 4 years (range, 1 to 10 years) separated these surgeries. Seven of the 10 patients underwent initial and secondary reductions with different technique. An average of 15 years (range, 5 to 19 years) separated these procedures. There was an average 5-year follow-up (range, 1 to 20 years) in this series. Four of the 10 patients experienced self-limiting complications after secondary reduction, including delay in wound healing, delay in the return of nipple sensitivity, and mild fat necrosis. Three of the four patients with complications had undergone secondary reduction with a different pedicle technique. No significant or long-lasting skin, pedicle, or nipple-areola complex compromise was found after secondary reduction mammaplasty. In contrast to the recently published guidelines, this study demonstrates that secondary reduction mammaplasty is a safe and viable option when performed with either similar or different technique. This finding allows secondary reduction mammaplasty to be tailored to the individual breast type and to the abilities of the specific surgeon.     

"Zigzag" wavy-line periareolar incision

There is almost no mention of improvement in the aesthetics of areolar incisions in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature. The most visible area of the breast is the central mound; therefore, it behooves surgeons to make an areolar incision as inconspicuous as possible. Minimal incision breast operations and short-scar operations, such as mastopexy and vertical reduction mammaplasty, use a circumareolar incision. This circumareolar technique, which specifically avoids a purse-string support suture, is useful in all periareolar incisions. This method creates a scar that mimics the elusive, natural irregularity between the areola and periareolar skin. The goal is to have an irregular, random, wavy line that appears more natural. Between August of 1998 and August of 1999, 104 "zigzag" wavy-line procedures were performed. The complications seen in this series included delayed healing in four patients and hypertrophic scar in two patients. No scars were surgically revised. The results demonstrated a definite difference compared to a circular scar. The zigzag wavy-line technique complements the innovative methods that shorten scars while they create a more natural, lasting breast mound. For areolar incisions, good results are deceptively subtle, but unnatural results can be painfully obvious. The zigzag wavy-line incision subtly eludes the eye in diminishing the signs the patient has undergone an operation.     

Camouflage and the Augmentation Mammaplasty

Augmentation mammaplasty has become a safe and accepted surgical procedure since the introduction of silicone prosthesis. Proper selection of the type and size of the implant and careful attention to making the line of incision as nearly invisible as possible are important for a natural-appearing breast. Placement of a silicone gel filled prosthetic implant through a periareolar incision achieves excellent contour and consistency in the augmented breast, with an essentially invisible scar.     

Medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty for severe mammary hypertrophy

Current options in reduction mammaplasty for severe mammary hypertrophy include amputation with free-nipple graft as well as the inferior pedicle and bipedicle techniques. Complications of these procedures include nipple-areola necrosis, insensitivity, and hypopigmentation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty can minimize these complications. Twenty-three patients with severe mammary hypertrophy were studied. The medial pedicle successfully transposed the nipple-areola complex in 44 of 45 breasts (98 percent). Mean change in nipple position was 17.1 cm, and mean weight of tissue removed was 1604 g per breast. Nipple-areola sensation was retained in 43 of 44 breasts (98 percent) using a medial pedicle. Hypopigmentation was not observed, and central breast projection was restored in all patients. This study has demonstrated that medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty is a safe and reliable technique and should be given primary consideration in cases of severe mammary hypertrophy.     

Outcome analysis of reduction mammaplasty using the modified Robertson technique

The benefits of reduction mammaplasty have been well documented in previous literature. Anticipating and correcting for pseudoptosis (bottoming-out), however, can impair the cosmetic outcome as the inferior skin envelope stretches and lengthens over time. We present long-term results on patients using the modified Robertson technique for reduction mammaplasty, which appears to have significant benefit in helping to prevent bottoming-out. Surveys were sent to patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty surgery with this technique from 1987 to 1997. Patients were queried regarding preoperative and postoperative symptoms, satisfaction, and outcome related to their surgery and were also offered free follow-up examinations. The patients who returned for follow-up were then evaluated by the attending surgeons for evaluation of scarring, nipple position, ptosis, pseudoptosis, shape, and overall appearance. Reduced breasts were also compared with cosmetically optimal breasts to compare for measured levels of pseudoptosis using our defined visual inferior pole ratio measurements. Average reduction size was 910 g and follow-up was 4.7 years from the time of surgery. There was significant improvement demonstrated in all areas questioned, with the greatest relief shown in back and shoulder pain, shoulder grooving, and difficulty fitting clothing. There was also demonstrated to be significantly less use of medical modalities postoperatively and significant increases in activity levels. Satisfaction for size, shape, symmetry, and overall results was 85, 94, 98, and 94 percent, respectively. Evaluations for pseudoptosis by the attending surgeons were rated good or excellent in 95 percent of patients. Measurements of the visual inferior pole ratio for pseudoptosis also demonstrated no significant differences when compared with aesthetically optimal breasts. The modified Robertson reduction mammaplasty is a reliable technique that can be used for both small and large reductions, giving both reliable and consistent results. This technique significantly improves symptoms, as do other reduction techniques, but has the added advantage of helping to avoid pseudoptosis postoperatively.     

A Z-mammaplasty with minimal scarring

An improved technique for reduction mammaplasty is described that has the advantage of giving a satisfactory final shape to the breast while producing a minimal scar. The method involves periareolar deepithelialization with displacement of the nipple-areola complex, partial subcutaneous mastectomy at the base of the mammary cone, and a Z-plasty to interlock two triangles of skin left after the removal of a little excess skin in the region above the inframammary fold. The Z-plasty adds skin vertically to the inferior pole, resulting in a better final shape and reducing tension around the areola. Any further excess skin is left to retract spontaneously. The best indications for this operation are in young women with elastic skin free of striae "gravidarum." Our experience now covers 53 patients aged 14 to 30 years with reductions of up to 900 gm per breast, and we have encountered no major complications over a 3-year follow-up period.     

The mutagenicity of electrocautery smoke.

Careful analysis of electrocautery smoke produced during breast surgery has found organic compounds that are unidentifiable with current analytical techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential mutagenicity of the smoke produced by the electrocautery knife during reduction mammaplasty. Multiple air samples were collected in the operating room during two reduction mammaplasty procedures. Airborne smoke particles were tested for mutagenic potential in both tester strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA98 and TA100) using the standard Salmonella microsomal test (Ames test). All testing was performed by the Hazard Evaluations and Technical Assistance Branch of the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. The smoke produced with the electrocautery knife during reduction mammaplasty was found to be mutagenic to the TA98 strain. The Ames test, an established technique for evaluating the mutagenicity of a substance, was convincingly positive for the smoke collected during the breast surgery. Whether the smoke represents a serious health risk to operating room personnel is not known. Development of techniques to limit electrocautery smoke exposure in the operating room appears to be needed, and surgeons should attempt to minimize their exposure.     

The role of reduction mammaplasty in reconstructing partial mastectomy defects

The management of breast tumors in women with macromastia can be challenging. Reconstructive options are limited and breast conservation therapy is often not indicated or results in poor cosmetic outcomes. The purpose of this report was to present a series of women with macromastia who underwent simultaneous reconstruction of a partial mastectomy defect with bilateral reduction mammaplasty. A retrospective review was performed and included all women who underwent partial mastectomy with simultaneous reduction mammaplasty. Data points included patient demographics, preoperative assessment, operative intervention, adjuvant treatment, and outcomes. Twenty women were included in the series (mean age, 43 years; range, 11 to 72 years) with an average body mass index of 32.6 (range, 24.9 to 44.1). Tissue diagnosis was ductal carcinoma (n = 8), ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 6), fibroadenoma (n = 4), and benign breast tissue (n = 2). The various reduction mammaplasty techniques were documented with regard to tumor size and location. The superior medial and inferior pedicles seemed to be the most versatile techniques. One patient required completion mastectomy with autologous tissue reconstruction given positive margins. All patients were disease-free at follow-up (mean, 23 months) and postoperative cancer surveillance was not impaired by the combined procedures. The versatility of reduction mammaplasty allows this procedure to be performed in conjunction with partial mastectomy for any tumor location. Combining these procedures in patients with macromastia provides numerous therapeutic benefits at low cost, while reducing breast distortion and preserving symmetry.     

The medial periareolar approach to submuscular augmentation mammaplasty under local anesthesia

The medial approach to submuscular augmentation mammaplasty under local anesthesia begins with a medial periareolar incision around one-half or more of the areola. A subcutaneous tunnel is made toward the medial breast border, avoiding mammary ducts and sensory nerves to the nipple. The breast is reflected laterally, exposing a patch of pectoralis major muscle. A submuscular pocket is then created beneath portions of the pectoralis major, rectus abdominis, external oblique abdominis, and serratus anterior muscles, after which the implant is inserted and the muscle, dermis, and skin are closed sequentially. The periareolar incision allows for favorable scars without compromising the access or exposure necessary for accurate implant placement. Complete muscle coverage of the implant should contribute to a lower rate of capsular contracture. With a medial submuscular approach, nipple sensation is rarely altered, and revisions, if necessary, can be done through the same incision, still under local anesthesia, for increased safety, economy, and convenience. The medial approach to breast augmentation is a highly versatile, safe, and consistent method of achieving excellent results in breast augmentation in terms of scar, symmetry, and softness.     

The limited scar mastopexy: current concepts and approaches to correct breast ptosis

The literature on short scar mastopexy was reviewed, with a focus on the different techniques. Currently four techniques have been described: the periareolar, the vertical, the inverted-T, and the L-shaped scar. The different techniques were evaluated with regard to patient selection, operative techniques, scar length, and complications. A large number of techniques have been published for minimal ptosis, whereas for significant ptosis, the number of surgical options is limited. It is evident that limited scar techniques can be applied to all grades of ptosis, but there is no one technique that can satisfactorily correct all degrees of ptosis. Plastic surgeons should weigh the advantages and limitations of each technique to correctly address breast ptosis. This article reviews an algorithmic approach to correct all degrees of ptosis with mastopexy.     

A follow-up study of 105 women with breast cancer following reduction mammaplasty.

Reduction mammaplasty is one of the most common procedures performed by plastic surgeons in Canada. In a recent study of 27,500 women in the province of Ontario who underwent breast reduction surgery, 105 women were identified who developed breast cancer after reduction mammaplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare women who had breast cancer and had a previous breast reduction with women who had breast cancer but did not have a breast reduction. Specifically, we wanted to document patient demographics, cancer type, surgical and nonsurgical treatment, and eventual outcome. A comparison group of non-breast reduction women was taken from the cohort of breast cancer patients in the province of Ontario, and the two groups were matched for age, year of diagnosis, and place of diagnosis. It was found that (1) the average age at diagnosis of breast cancer is significantly younger for women who have had previous breast reduction surgery than for those who have not; (2) the median interval between breast reduction and cancer is 5 years; (3) the type, location, and side of breast cancers are similar in the two groups of women; (4) breast reduction does not significantly increase or decrease survival rate from breast cancer; and (5) women who have had breast reduction receive the same treatment for their breast cancer as women who have not had reduction mammaplasty.     

Short scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction (SPAIR) mammaplasty

A method of breast reduction is presented that maintains the blood supply and innervation to the nipple and areola complex by means of an inferior pedicle, reduces the breast volume by removing tissue from the periphery of the breast, maintains breast shape with internal plication sutures, and limits the scar using a periareolar technique with a short inferior vertical-to-oblique extension. There were 167 breasts in 98 patients reduced in this fashion. The average resection volume was 632 g per breast, with an average follow-up of 7.6 months. The complication rate was similar to that observed using traditional inferior pedicle techniques with the inverted-T cutaneous scar. This technique has proven to be versatile, technically straightforward, and applicable to breasts of all sizes for both breast reduction and mastopexy. By combining the aesthetic advantage of less cutaneous scarring with the safety and familiarity of the inferiorly based pedicle, superior results in breast reduction can be obtained that are consistent, long-lasting, and satisfying for both patient and surgeon alike.     

Physical and psychosocial symptoms among 88 volunteer subjects compared with patients seeking plastic surgery procedures to the breast

In an investigation of the relationship between macromastia and physical and psychosocial symptoms, 88 female university students, 21 augmentation mammaplasty patients, and 31 breast reduction patients graded somatic and psychosocial symptoms. The intent of the study was to discover which complaints were most common among women presenting for reduction mammaplasty and to determine whether height/weight index and brassiere chest measurement and cup size might affect their symptoms. Both the student group and the augmentation mammaplasty patients differed significantly from the breast reduction patients. Eighty-one percent of the reduction patients complained of neck and back pain. Seventy-seven percent complained of shoulder pain, 58 percent complained of chafing or rash; 45 percent reported significant limitation in their activity; and 52 percent were unhappy with their appearance (p < 0.001 compared with augmentation and student groups). Physical symptoms were related to height/weight index and bra chest and cup sizes in each of the three participating groups. It was found that patients who present for symptom-related reduction mammaplasty have a disease-specific group of physical and psychosocial complaints that are more directly related to large breast size than to being overweight.     

Review of data describing outcomes that are used to assess changes in quality of life after reduction mammaplasty.

Although plastic surgeons have empirically "known" of the benefits of reduction mammaplasty for their patients, a paucity of outcome studies have been reported. For this study, an attempt to perform a meta-analysis of outcomes in reduction mammaplasty was undertaken. A computer literature search was performed of the MEDLINE database for the period between 1966 and September of 1997 for the Medical Subject Headings mammaplasty and outcome measures. Reference lists were used for additional reports. No trials were identified that met the criteria for meta-analysis. Seventeen publications met less restrictive review criteria that evaluated quality-of-life outcome measures. A systematic evaluation of patient-focused outcome measures demonstrated that consistent improvement in physical symptoms was found across most studies, as was a high degree of patient satisfaction (78 to 95 percent very or moderately satisfied), and some have shown improvement in body image and psychological well-being. However, although this review does identify consistent improvements in patient quality of life after reduction mammaplasty, inconsistencies among study designs do not allow formal meta-analysis.