Heart HIF-1alpha and MAP kinases during hypoxia: are they associated in vivo?

To study the in vivo dynamics of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha), master regulator of O(2)-dependent gene expression, and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) in the hypoxic myocardium, Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 4 to 6 per group) were exposed to 1-hr hypoxia (10% O(2)), 23-hr hypoxia, and 23-hr hypoxia, followed by reoxygenation. HIF-1alpha increased 15-fold after 1-hr hypoxia, remained constant for 23 hrs, and returned to baseline on reoxygenation. Extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) were unchanged throughout. Phosphorylated p38 increased 4-fold after 1-hr hypoxia and returned to baseline within 23-hr hypoxia. The activity of stress-activated protein kinases/c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinases (JNKs), measured as phosphorylated c-Jun, increased 3-fold after 1-hr hypoxia and remained sustained afterward. Furthermore, HIF-1alpha was halved in rats that were administered with the p38 inhibitor SB202190 and made hypoxic for 1 hr. In conclusion, although very sensitive to the reoxygenation, HIF-1alpha is overexpressed in vivo in the hypoxic myocardium, and its acute induction by hypoxia is correlated with that of p38.     

Monoubiquitination: the signal for p53 nuclear export?

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway has become an increasingly important regulatory mechanism for protein function. Countless proteins are degraded by the addition of polymeric ubiquitin chains, but more recently, monoubiquitination has emerged as a mechanism for regulatory functions other than proteasomal degradation. Monoubiquitination acts as a signal in nuclear export for the tumor suppressor protein p53. Different levels of Mdm2 are capable of inducing both mono- and polyubiquitination in a dosage dependent manner, thus determining p53's fate. Our findings demonstrate monoubiquitin-mediated protein trafficking can be expanded to nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling, and also imply similar scenarios may apply to other cellular factors.     

Tumor suppression by p53: fall of the triumvirate?

p53 is a key tumor suppressor protein that has numerous functions. Its primary mode of action has generally been ascribed to the induction of cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, or senescence upon stress. Li et al. challenge this dogma with evidence that all three of these programs are dispensable for p53's tumor suppressive role.     

Ribosome biogenesis and p53: Who is regulating whom?

Comment on: Krastev DB, et al. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:809-18.     

Mdmx: A p53 activator?

Comment on: Di Conza G, et al. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:749–60     

Induction and activation of the p53 pathway: a role for the protein kinase CK2?

Protein kinase CK2 has many established in vitro substrates, but it is only within the past few years that we have begun to ascertain which of these are its real physiological targets, how their phosphorylation may contribute towards regulating normal cell physiology, and how phosphorylation of these proteins might influence the development of diseases such as cancer. One of the well-characterised in vitro substrates for CK2 is the tumour suppressor protein, p53. However, the physiological nature of this interaction has never been fully established. In the present article, we summarise a recent study from our laboratory showing that phosphorylation of p53 at Ser392, the sole site modified by CK2 in vitro, is regulated by a novel mechanism where the stoichiometry of phosphorylation is governed by the rate of turnover of the p53 protein. Such a model is entirely consistent with phosphorylation by a constitutively active protein kinase such as CK2. In contrast to this, while there is overwhelming evidence that CK2 phosphorylates p53 in vitro and is the only detectable Ser392 protein kinase in cell extracts, our data raise uncertainty as to whether this interaction truly reflects events underpinning Ser392 phosphorylation in vivo. We consider the possible role of CK2 in regulating the p53 response in a wider context and suggest key issues that should be addressed experimentally to provide a more cohesive picture of the relationship between this important protein kinase and a pivotal anti-cancer surveillance system in cells.     

p53 Mutants: the Achilles’ Heel of Human Cancers?

Recent scientific discoveries have thrust mutants of the tumor suppressor protein p53 into the forefront of the war on cancer, and hold out eventual hope for a small molecule drug that will be useful in treating human cancers with mutant p53 protein.     

Guilt by association? p53 and the development of aneuploidy in cancer

Aneuploidy is one of the most frequent genetic alterations in solid tumors. It is commonly caused by cell division errors that are induced by oncogene activation or loss of tumor suppressor functions. In addition, certain viral oncoproteins have been implicated in the induction of chromosome copy number changes. Aneuploidy and inactivation of p53 frequently coincide in human cancers but there is increasing evidence that loss of p53 by itself is not a primary cause of aneuploidy. Nonetheless, p53 inactivation synergizes with additional oncogenic events to promote aneuploidy and may facilitate chromosomal imbalances through indirect mechanisms. This review summarizes the current knowledge about the association between aneuploidy and p53, and discusses two of the most controversial mechanisms that have been implicated in genomic instability associated with loss of p53: subversion of ploidy control and aberrant centrosome duplication.     

p53 and TGF-beta in development: prelude to tumor suppression?

Recent work in Xenopus embryos reveals an unexpected developmental role for the tumor suppressor gene p53. This finding may have implications for the evolution of p53, its interaction with Smads in TGF-beta dependent mesoderm specification, and the cooperation among p53 family members.     

p53 and ageing: too much of a good thing?

A recent report by Tyner et al.(1) suggests that p53 is bad for longevity. Heterozygotic mice carrying a p53 mutation that apparently enhances the stability of the wild-type protein showed shorter lifespans and faster ageing while also developing fewer tumours. This fits with the idea that cellular ageing is the price paid for better protection against unlimited proliferation of cancer cells. But other work shows that there is a strong positive association between DNA repair-mediated protection against cancer and ageing. So what are we to make of the new data with regard to overall understanding of the mechanisms of ageing?