Origins of the Ceboidea viewed from an immunological perspective

Ceboid origins were reviewed from the standpoint of immunodiffusion systematics. Computer processing of spur size data from several thousand trefoil Ouchterlony plate comparisons using rabbit antisera to proteins of various primate, tree shrew and elephant shrew species depicted antigenic distances among the various species. A least squares procedure (executed by a new computer program AJUST) corrected for nonreciprocity in the raw antigenic distance matrix. Another computer program (UWPGM) then produced a cladogram from the normalized antigenic distance matrix. Within the cladogram, tree shrews are closer to undisputed primates than to non-primates. The undisputed primates appear as a monophyletic assemblage, consisting of two major lineages: the Strepsirhini, including lorisoid and lemuroid branches, and the Haplorhini. Haplorhini divides into a tarsioid branch and Anthropoidea. The latter consists of two sister groups, Catarrhini (Hominoidea and Cercopithecoidea) and Platyrrhini (Ceboidea). Thus, this cladogram supports those hypotheses of ceboid origins which depict the phyletic line ancestral to the extant Anthropoidea as first separating from strepsirhine and tarsioid lineages before splitting apart into Platyrrhini and Catarrhini. Present evidence does not reveal if the most recent common ancestor of platyrrhines and catarrhines was morphologically still a prosimian or if it existed late enough in the Tertiary to have reached the simian grade.     

Immunoglobulin allotypes (Gm,Am, and Km) in non-human primates

The immunoglobulin (Ig) allotypes (Gm, Am, and Km systems) are the genetic markers of the human IgG1, IgG2, IgG3(Gm), IgA2(Am), and kappa light chain(Km). The Gm system, with 18 allotypes shows the greatest degree of polymorphism and we define two Am and three Km allotypes. In this review, we report all the results observed in non-human primates belonging to Hominoidea, Cercopithecoidea, Ceboidea, Lorisoidea, Lemuroidea, and Tupaoidea superfamilies (72 species and subspecies). They concern published data and new unpublished ones. The distribution of the human allotypes and their localization are reported, as well as discordant results observed in some cases with anti-allotype reagents of the same specificity (human and animal origin). Some allotypes are restricted to man. Hominoidea have the greatest number of Gm allotypes and the richest polymorphism. Relatively few allotypes have been found in Cercopithecoidea and Prosimians; most Platyrrhinian species have no allotype. The epitopic polymorphism has been interpreted in terms of evolution of Ig allotypes from primate to man and of the phylogenetic relationships of non-human primate species.     

The skin of primates. XLIV. Numerical taxonomy of primate skin

Data on 84 characteristics of the skin of 36 species of primates were extracted from a series of articles describing the histological and histochemical properties of the skin of primates. The data were subjected to a cluster analysis. The results were in reasonably good agreement with orthodox primate taxonomies although some exceptions were apparent. The species clustered into four main groups approximately comparable to Prosimii, Cercopithecoidea, Ceboidea, and Hominoidea. The internal arrangements of the Prosimii, Cercopithecoidea, and Hominoidea are commensurate with standard taxonomic practice. Within the Ceboidea, however, the Atelinae and Alouattinae tend to group with the Hominoidea, Aotus and Saimiri show variable placements, and Callimico groups with the Callithricidae.     

Molecular evidence on Primate phylogeny from DNA sequences

Evidence from DNA sequences on the phylogenetic systematics of primates is congruent with the evidence from morphology in grouping Cercopithecoidea (Old World monkeys) and Hominoidea (apes and humans) into Catarrhini, Catarrhini and Platyrrhini (ceboids or New World monkeys) into Anthropoidea, Lemuriformes and Lorisiformes into Strepsirhini, and Anthropoidea, Tarsioidea, and Strepsirhini into Primates. With regard to the problematic relationships of Tarsioidea, DNA sequences group it with Anthropoidea into Haplorhini. In addition, the DNA evidence favors retaining Cheirogaleidae within Lemuriformes in contrast to some morphological studies that favor placing Cheirogaleids in Lorisiformes. While parsimony analysis of the present DNA sequence data provides only modest support for Haplorhini as a monophyletic taxon, it provides very strong support for Hominoidea, Catarrhini, Anthropoidea, and Strepsirhini as monophyletic taxa. The parsimony DNA evidence also rejects the hypothesis that megabats are the sister group of either Primates or Dermoptera (flying lemur) or a Primate-Dermoptera clade and instead strongly supports the monophyly of Chiroptera, with megabats grouping with microbats at considerable distance from Primates. In contrast to the confused morphological picture of sister group relationships within Hominoidea, orthologous noncoding DNA sequences (spanning alignments involving as many as 20,000 base positions) now provide by the parsimony criterion highly significant evidence for the sister group relationships defined by a cladistic classification that groups the lineages to all extant hominoids into family Hominidae, divides this ape family into subfamilies Hylobatinae (gibbons) and Homininae, divides Homininae into tribes Pongini (orangutans) and Hominini, and divides Hominini into subtribes Gorillina (gorillas) and Hominina (humans and chimpanzees). A likelihood analysis of the largest body of these noncoding orthologues and counts of putative synapomorphies using the full range of sequence data from mitochondrial and nuclear genomes also find that humans and chimpanzees share the longest common ancestry. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Phylogeny of African monkeys based upon mitochondrial 12S rRNA sequences

The suborder Anthropoidea of the primates has traditionally been divided in three superfamilies: the Hominoidea (apes and humans) and the Cercopithecoidea (Old World monkeys), together comprising the infraorder Catarrhini, and the Ceboidea (New World monkeys) belonging to the infraorder Platyrrhini.We have sequenced an approximately 390-base-pair part of the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene for 26 species of the major groups of African monkeys and apes and constructed an extensive phylogeny based upon DNA evidence. Not only is this phylogeny of great importance in classification of African guenons, but it also suggests rearrangements in traditional monkey taxonomy and evolution. Baboons and mandrills were found to be not directly related, while we could confirm that the known four superspecies of mangabeys do not form a monophyletic group, but should be separated into two genera, one clustering with baboons and the other with mandrills. Patas monkeys are clearly related to members of the genus Cercopithecus despite their divergence in build and habitat, while the talapoin falls outside the Cercopithecus clade (including the patas monkey). Correspondence to: A.C. van der Kuyl     

A molecular view of primate phylogeny and important systematic and evolutionary questions

Phylogenetic analysis of extensive nucleotide sequence data from primate beta-globin gene clusters elucidates the systematics and evolution of the order Primates and reveals that rates of accumulation of mutations vary by as much as a factor of seven among different primate lineages. The picture of primate phylogeny from DNA sequences clarifies many ambiguities of the morphological picture. In the molecular picture, dwarf and brown lemurs group together into superfamily Lemuroidea, Lemuroidea and Lorisoidea into suborder Strepsirhini, and Tarsius and Anthropoidea into suborder Haplorhini. The molecular picture also provides both significant evidence for a human-chimpanzee clade that narrowly excludes gorilla and overwhelming evidence for the gorilla-chimpanzee-human clade within Hominoidea. Rates of DNA sequence evolution appear to have been fastest in the early primates ancestral to Anthropoidea and next fastest on the lorisoid branch. Rates were slowest over the past 25 Myr of hominoid descent, suggesting that mechanisms lowering the mutation rate evolved in correlation with lengthened life spans.     

The phylogenetic system of primates—character evolution in the light of a consolidated tree

Molecular analyses of the last decades helped solving the major open questions on the external and internal phylogenetic relationships of primates. The present review uses these data for the inference of character evolution along the branches of the primate tree. Altogether, more than 200 evolutionary changes in hard and soft tissue anatomy/morphology, behavior, physiology, and protein constitution are presented in the context of their functional relevance and adaptive value. The compilation focuses on primates as a whole and on the higher-ranked primate subtaxa with living representatives: Strepsirhini: Lorisiformes, Galagidae, Lorisidae, Lemuriformes; Haplorhini: Tarsioidea, Anthropoidea, Platyrrhini, Atelidae + Cebidae, Atelidae, Cebidae, Aotinae, Callithrichinae, Cebinae, Pitheciidae, Pithecinae, Catarrhini, Cercopithecoidea, Cercopithecinae, Colobinae, Colobini, and Hominoidea. Within Hominoidea character evolution is traced down to more peripheral branches: Hylobatidae, Hominidae, Pongo, Homininae, Gorilla, Pan + Homo, Pan, and modern humans. Character states in extinct representatives of Plesiadapiformes, Omomyoidea, Propliopithecidae, Hominini, etc. are always taken into account; they are presented in detail whenever character-state distribution in living species is ambiguous or misleading. The taxonomic sample and the characters included combine to a phylogenetic system that illustrates primate evolution and diversity. The data presented additionally provide a detailed picture of the evolutionary steps and trends involved in hominization. Reflections on the frequently underestimated role of polymorphisms in phylogenetic analyses complete the survey.     

Functional aspects of primate pelvic structure: A multivariate approach

This study aims to clarify the relationship of primate bony pelvic structure to locomotor habit. As with most of the postcranial skeleton, the pelvic bones of species within the Ceboidea and the Cercopithecoidea are remarkably similar visually except for variations in size. Yet there are substantial differences in locomotor pattern between the species in these taxa. I performed canonical analyses on a sample of 17 pelvic variables describing 22 primate species of the Ceboidea, the Cercopithecoidea, and the Hominoidea to discover which variables were significant in separating them into groups. In both analyses there was good separation of major taxa and additional separation of groups that differed in locomotor habit. The separation of colobine from cercopithecine monkeys was particularly consistent. In the analysis, including all 22 species, the variables given particular weight by the canonical analysis were the same as those traditionally used by anatomists for the same purpose. Specifically, breadth of the ischial tuberosity (reflecting presence or absence of ischial callosities) separated the Old from the New World monkeys. Breadth of the iliac tuberosity, in which man and to some extent other hominoids differ from other primates, and ilium height, in which man differs from other primates, were significant. Sagittal diameter of the pelvis was also substantially weighted. Having established that the technique would select variables of anatomical significance, the same method was applied to a study of monkeys only where the characteristics that differ between groups are not well established. Breadth of the ischial tuberosity was again important in separating the Ceboidea from the Cercopithecoidea. Discrimination of locomotor groups within these large divisions was brought about mainly by ischial length and the sagittal diameter of the pelvis. In studying these variables and their relationship to size in greater detail, it was found that among cercopithecoid monkeys, the colobines showed relatively lower values than did cercopithecines for both these dimensions. Atelines showed low values for ischial length but high values for the sagittal pelvic diameter. Biomechanical explanations of these observations are suggested.     

Phylogenetic influences on hormone levels across the primate order

Adrenal and gonadal hormone levels were evaluated in representative species from Prosimii, Ceboidea, Cercopithecoidea, and Hominoidea to determine if endocrine activity was influenced by phylogenetic factors. Most small-bodied New World primates had extremely high levels of cortisol, progesterone, and testosterone when compared with Old World primates. In contrast to the high hormone levels and diversity found in Ceboidea, Old World primates showed a more similar pattern of hormone secretion. Thus, this survey supports earlier reports indicating that the callitricids and smaller cebid monkeys have a distinctive hormone profile. Although higher hormone levels tended to be associated with lower body weight, this effect was not evident in all taxa, and there were many notable exceptions. When species differ from their predicted hormone levels based on phylogenetic heritage and body weight (e.g., titi monkeys), we must look for other biological factors that influence endocrine activity. © 1992 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Sexual dimorphism and allometry in primate ossa coxae

Five measurements were taken on the ossa coxae of 454 adult primates representing Ceboidea, Cercopithecoidea and Hominoidea. Sex differences in these variables and their relationships to overall body size and sexual dimorphism were tested by means of Student's t-test and regression analysis. The study attempts to clarify the nature of primate pelvic sexual dimorphism, including allometric effects, and more specifically, test the assertion made by Mobb and Wood (1977) that sexual dimorphism in body size in not an important determinant in pelvic sex differences. Variables that contribute to the size of the birth canal tend to be larger in females than males in all taxa studied except two. In these, Hylobates and Alouatta, there were no significant differences between the sexes for any of the five variables. In general, sexual dimorphism in variables contributing to the size of the birth canal was correlated (r ? 0.8) with sexual dimorphism in body size. Furthermore, the coefficients of allometry underlying pelvic sex differences were shown to be moderately correlated (r ? 0.5) with sexual dimorphism in size. The influence of other adaptive factors on primate pelvic sexual dimorphism are also briefly discussed.     

The taxonomic and functional significance of overall body proportions in Primates

Univariate and multivariate study of 22 dimensions describing overall body proportions in 34 primate genera, has shown that these quantities effect a separation between the principal taxonomic divisions of the Primates: Prosimii, Ceboidea, Cercopithecoidea and Hominoidea. The last three do not, however, link to form a single unit, and the separation between the Ceboidea and Cercopithecoidea is imperfect. Some grouping within these major divisions appears, in certain aspects, to be of functional (locomotor), rather than of purely taxonomic, significance. For instance, within the Prosimii, the genera Microcebus, Galago and Tarsius (the two latter being saltatory forms, while leaping is a component of the locomotor pattern of the first) are associated, while within the apes, the Asiatic forms Hylobates, Symphalangus and Pongo (all brachiators) tend to be grouped, as also do the African forms Pan and Gorilla (both, to a large extent, secondarily terrestrial in habit).
The measures especially prominent in effecting this pattern of discrimination are: relative foot length, relative lower limb length and length of foot relative to lower limb length.
Similar, if less clearly defined results emerge if groups of dimensions relating to individual body regions (forelimb, hindlimb, head and trunk) are analysed separately.
The apparent failure of compounds of the measures of the limbs to give an anticipated close reflection of locomotor function stems possibly from the fact that the available dimensions are of an overall nature rather than a reflection of specific biomechanical functions. Such sub-division, according with locomotor pattern as seems to emerge from this study, appears, in fact, to be little more than that implied in current taxonomic schemata.     

Primate repetitive DNAs: evidence for new satellite DNAs and similarities in non-satellite repetitive DNA sequence properties

Repetitious DNA sequences have been isolated from a number of the primates in both Suborders Anthropoidea and Prosimii by hydroxyapatite chromatography at a C₀t of 10. In addition to finding previously unreported possible AT-rich satellite DNAs in Orangutan, Gibbon, Rhesus and Slow Loris a clear similarity to human DNA was found in the non-satellite repetitious DNA sequence properties of the primates in the Suborder Anthropoidea. This is based on the presence of the hydroxyapatite isolated 1.703 and 1.714 g/cm³ DNA families in CsCl gradients in the analytical ultracentrifuge following renaturation and extensive DNA hyperpolymer network formation. Within the superfamily Hominoidea the amount of the 1.714 g/cm³ DNA family was greater than that of the 1.703 g/cm³ DNA family while the reverse situation was true within the Superfamily Cercopithecoidea. The orangutan 1.703 and 1.714 g/cm³ DNA families were shown to exhibit the same differential reassociation behavior demonstrated previously in human DNA (Marx et al., 1976a). These data are interpreted as preliminary evidence for a similar sequence organization in the Order Primates Suborder Anthropoidea.     

Molecular phylogeny of the family of apes and humans

The morphological picture of primate phylogeny has not unambiguously identified the nearest outgroup of Anthropoidea and has not resolved the branching pattern within Hominoidea. The molecular picture provides more resolution and clarifies the systematics of Hominoidea. Protein and DNA evidence divides Hominoidea into Hylobatidae (gibbons) and Hominidae, family Hominidae into Ponginae (orangutan) and Homininae, and subfamily Homininae into two tribes, one for Gorilla, and the other for Pan (chimpanzee) and Homo. Parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses, carried out on orthologous noncoding nucleotide sequences from primate beta-globin gene clusters, provide significant evidence for the human-chimpanzee tribe and overwhelming evidence for the human-chimpanzee-gorilla clade. These analyses also indicate that the rate of molecular evolution became slower in hominoids than in other primates and mammals.     

Primate phylogeny, evolutionary rate variations, and divergence times: a contribution from the nuclear gene IRBP

The first third (ca. 1200 bp) of exon 1 of the nuclear gene encoding the interstitial retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) has been sequenced for 12 representative primates belonging to Lemuriformes, Lorisiformes, Tarsiiformes, Platyrrhini, and Catarrhini, and combined with available data (13 other primates, 11 nonprimate placentals, and 2 marsupials). Phylogenetic analyses using maximum likelihood on nucleotides and amino acids robustly support the monophyly of primates, Strepsirrhini, Lemuriformes, Lorisiformes, Anthropoidea, Catarrhini, and Platyrrhini. It is interesting to note that 1) Tarsiidae grouped with Anthropoidea, and the support for this node depends on the molecular characters considered; 2) Cheirogaleidae grouped within Lemuriformes; and 3) Daubentonia was the sister group of all other Lemuriformes. Study of the IRBP evolutionary rate shows a high heterogeneity within placentals and also within primates. Maximum likelihood local molecular clocks were assigned to three clades displaying significantly contrasted evolutionary rates. Paenungulata were shown to evolve 2.5-3 times faster than Perissodactyla and Lemuriformes. Six independent calibration points were used to estimate splitting ages of the main primate clades, and their compatibility was evaluated. Divergence ages were obtained for the following crown groups: 13.8-14.2 MY for Lorisiformes, 26.5-27.2 MY for Lemuroidea, 39.6-40.7 MY for Lemuriformes, 45.4-46.7 MY for Strepsirrhini, and 56.7-58.4 MY for Haplorrhini. The incompatibility between some paleontological and molecular estimates may reflect the incompleteness of the placental fossil record, and/or indicate that the variable IRBP evolutionary rates are not fully accommodated by local molecular clocks.     

Organization of seminiferous epithelium in primates: relationship to spermatogenic efficiency,phylogeny, and mating system

The succession in time and space of specific germ cell associations, denoted as spermatogenic stages, is a typical feature of mammalian spermatogenesis. The arrangement of these stages is either single stage (one spermatogenic stage per tubular cross-section) or multistage (more than one spermatogenic stage per tubular cross-section). It has been proposed that the single-stage versus multistage arrangement is related to spermatogenic efficiency and that the multistage arrangement is typical for hominids. In the present work, the arrangement of spermatogenic stages and the spermatogenic efficiency of 17 primate species, comprising Strepsirrhini (Prosimians: Lemuriformes, Lorisiformes), Platyrrhini (New World primates), Catarrhini (Old World primates), and Hominoidea (great apes and humans), were analyzed comparatively by quantitative histological and flow cytometric means. We found a predominant single-stage tubular organization in the Strepsirrhini, indicating that the single-stage form represents the ancestral state. The highest degree of multistage complexity was found in Hominoidea (except orangutan) and in Platyrrhini, but not in Catarrhini. Hence, no direct relationship between single-stage/multistage tubular topography and phylogeny could be established across primates. In fact, the tubule arrangement seen in Platyrrhini and Catarrhini primates is the reverse of what might be expected from phylogeny. Interestingly, spermatogenic efficiency was similar in all species. We found no correlation between single-stage/multistage arrangement and spermatogenic efficiency or mating system. We speculate that the presence of a single-stage/multistage organization might simply reflect germ cell clonal size. Our findings further indicate that sperm competition in primates is not reflected at the level of testicular function.     

Comparative study of primates' transcortin: immunoreactivity and steroid-binding activity

To investigate the phylogenic aspect of transcortin (corticosteroid-binding globulin, CBG), the immunoreactivity of transcortin with anti-human transcortin antiserum was studied in primates. The anti-human transcortin antibody was recognized by plasma proteins obtained from Catarrhini, taxonomically the most evolved monkey group. The immunoreactivity was not observed in plasma obtained from Platyrrhini and Prosimiae, classified as less evolved monkey groups than Catarrhini. Though comparison of immunoreactivity among different classes of Catarrhini was difficult because of non-parallelism of their displacement curves, displacement of 125I-labelled human transcortin from the antiserum by 1:10 and 1:100 diluted plasma was highest in human followed by Pongidae, Cercopithecoidea. The immunoreactivity of thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG) with anti-human TBG antiserum was also examined. The anti-human TBG antibody was only recognized in plasma from Pan (anthropoid ape) among Pongidae, highly evolved monkeys among Catarrhini. The existence of immunoreactive transcortin and TBG to respective human protein antibody in the highly evolved ape agreed well with the cladogenetic division of primate species delineated by Goodman and Moore (1971). Cortisol-binding activity of transcortin was detected in all monkeys except three, tafted capuchin monkey, night monkey and cotton-headed tamarin, which belong to Platyrrhini. The absence of cortisol-binding activity in these animals might be attributed to high levels of endogenous cortisol and low cortisol-binding capacity of transcortin. It is speculated that the structure of the immunoreactive site in transcortin could be modified by evolution without affecting the biologically important site, the site for cortisol binding.     

Molecular evolution of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I in primates: is there coevolution between mitochondrial and nuclear genomes?

Phylogenetic analyses carried out on cytochrome c oxidase (COX) subunit I mitochondrial genes from 14 primates representing the major branches of the order and four outgroup nonprimate eutherians revealed that transversions and amino acid replacements (i.e., the more slowly occurring sequence changes) contained lower levels of homoplasy and thus provided more accurate information on cladistic relationships than transitions (i.e., the more rapidly occurring sequence changes). Several amino acids, each with a high likelihood of functionality involving the binding of cytochrome c or interaction with COX VIII, have changed in Anthropoidea, the primate suborder grouping New World monkey, Old World monkey, ape, and human lineages. They are conserved in other mammalian lineages and in nonanthropoid primates. Maximum-likelihood ancestral COX I nucleotide sequences were determined utilizing a near most parsimonious branching arrangement for the primate sequences that was consistent with previously hypothesized primate cladistic relationships based on larger and more diverse data sets. Relative rate tests of COX I mitochondrial sequences showed an elevated nonsynonymous (N) substitution rate for anthropoid-nonanthropoid comparisons. This finding for the largest mitochondrial (mt) DNA-encoded subunit is consistent with previous observations of elevated nonsynonymous substitution/synonymous substitution (S) rates in primates for mt-encoded COX II and for the nuclear-encoded COX IV and COX VIIa-H. Other COX-related proteins, including cytochrome c and cytochrome b, also show elevated amino acid replacement rates or N/S during similar time frames, suggesting that this group of interacting genes is likely to have coevolved during primate evolution.     

Primate evolution at the DNA level and a classification of hominoids

Summary The genetic distances among primate lineages estimated from orthologous noncoding nucleotide sequences of -type globin loci and their flanking and intergenic DNA agree closely with the distances (delta T₅₀H values) estimated by cross hybridization of total genomic single-copy DNAs. These DNA distances and the maximum parsimony tree constructed for the nucleotide sequence orthologues depict a branching pattern of primate lineages that is essentially congruent with the picture from phylogenetic analyses of morphological characters. The molecular evidence, however, resolves ambiguities in the morphological picture and provides an objective view of the cladistic position of humans among the primates. The molecular data group humans with chimpanzees in subtribe Hominina, with gorillas in tribe Hominini, orangutans in subfamily Homininae, gibbons in family Hominidae, Old World monkeys in infraorder Catarrhini, New World monkeys in semisuborder Anthropoidea, tarsiers in suborder Haplorhini, and strepsirhines (lemuriforms and lorisiforms) in order Primates. A seeming incongruency between organismal and molecular levels of evolution, namely that morphological evolution appears to have speeded up in higher primates, especially in the lineage to humans, while molecular evolution has slowed down, may have the trivial explanation that relatively small genetic changes may sometimes result in marked phenotypic changes.     

Molecular Timing of Primate Divergences as Estimated by Two Nonprimate Calibration Points

The complete mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) molecule of the hamadryas baboon, Papio hamadryas, was sequenced and included in a molecular analysis of 24 complete mammalian mtDNAs. The particular aim of the study was to time the divergence between Cercopithecoidea and Hominoidea. That divergence, set at 30 million years before present (MYBP) was a fundamental reference for the original proposal of recent hominoid divergences, according to which the split among gorilla, chimpanzee, and Homo took place 5 MYBP. In the present study the validity of the postulated 30 MYBP dating of the Cercopithecoidea/Hominoidea divergence was examined by applying two independent nonprimate molecular references, the divergence between artiodactyls and cetaceans set at 60 MYBP and that between Equidae and Rhinocerotidae set at 50 MYBP. After calibration for differences in evolutionary rates, application of the two references suggested that the Cercopithecoidea/Hominoidea divergence took place >50 MYBP. Consistent with the marked shift in the dating of the Cercopithecoidea/Hominoidea split, all hominoid divergences receive a much earlier dating. Thus the estimated date of the divergence between Pan (chimpanzee) and Homo is 10–13 MYBP and that between Gorilla and the Pan/Homo linage ≈17 MYBP. The same datings were obtained in an analysis of clocklike evolving genes. The findings show that recalculation is necessary of all molecular datings based directly or indirectly on a Cercopithecoidea/Hominoidea split 30 MYBP. Received: 1 April 1998 / Accepted: 1 July 1998     

Phylogeny and geographical deployment of the Primates

A classification of the Primates into three suborders is adopted.The Paromyiformes, possibly derived from the Purgatorinae, illustrate an early radiation localized in time (Late Cretaceous-Eocene) and space (North America and Europe).The Strepsirhini pose phylogenetic problems: position of the Daubentoniidae; position of the Cheirogaleidae (possible Lorisoidea); interrelations of the Adapoidea, Lemuroidea and Lorisoidea. The cradle of the group was probably situated in Africa, which would have been the source of migrations towards Eurasia and Madagascar. It is not excluded that Madagascar could be the place of origin of the African Lorisoidea.The Haplorhini are divided into two sister-groups, early differentiated by geographical segregation on both sides of the Tethys. The Tarsiiformes, exclusively Laurasian, may have originated in North America, but their relationships with the Paromomyiformes remain problematical. The Simiiformes (= Anthropoidea) have almost certainly originated in Africa. A transatlantic migration towards the end of the Eocene constitutes the most probable hypothesis (here put forward) to explain the colonization of the neotropical region by the Platyrrhini. The Catarrhini, at first exclusively African (the question of the fossils from the Eocene of Burma remains open) have invaded Eurasia since the Miocene (arrivals at intervals since the middle Miocene) thanks to the new geographical connections resulting from the Alpine orogeny.