细胞周期分子机制的成功探索——2001年诺贝尔生理及医学奖部分工作介绍

细胞周期是指连续分裂的细胞从一次有丝分裂结束到下一次有丝分裂完成所经历的整个序贯过程.在这一过程中,细胞的遗传物质(DNA)经过复制平均分配到两个子细胞中.细胞周期中每一事件都是有规律、精确地发生,并且在时间与空间上受到严格调控.细胞周期中最关键的三类调控因子是：cdc基因、周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDKs)及细胞周期蛋白(cyclin).这些调控因子的发现对肿瘤学及发育生物学的发展都有重要的理论和实践意义.     

酿酒酵母Cdk1抑制蛋白的研究进展

细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶1(cyclin-dependent kinase 1,Cdk1)是真核生物细胞周期调控的核心,也是维持基因组稳定性的重要激酶,其活性受到严格调控.CDK抑制蛋白(cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor,CKI)是调节其活性的一类关键负调控因子,CKI功能失活导致细胞不受控制地增殖,促进癌症的发生发展.酿酒酵母作为细胞周期研究的重要模式生物,在揭示CDK活性调控机制中发挥着重要作用.酿酒酵母中已发现的Cdk1抑制蛋白CKI包括Far1、Sic1以及最近鉴定的Cip1蛋白.这三个CKI蛋白在不同细胞时期中,通过抑制Cdk1活性调控细胞周期的进程.此外,CKI还在应对环境胁迫,保持基因组稳定性中发挥重要作用.本文对酿酒酵母Cdk1抑制蛋白CKI的研究进展,尤其是CKI在细胞周期运转及胁迫应答中的作用做出综述,以期为细胞周期及癌症的基础研究提供模式依据.     

Genome sequencing in the sea urchin embryo: what is new concerning the cell cycle?

Sea urchin is a classical research model system in developmental biology; moreover, the external fertilization and growth of embryos, their rapid division cycle, their transparency and the accessibility of these embryos to molecular visualization methods, made them good specimens to analyze the regulatory mechanisms of cell division. These features as well as the phylogenetic position of sea urchin, close to vertebrates but in an outgroup within the deuterostomes, led scientists working on this model to sequence the genome of the species S. purpuratus. The genome contains a full repertoire of cell cycle control genes. A comparison of this toolkit with those from vertebrates, nematodes, drosophila, as well as tunicates, provides new insight into the evolution of cell cycle control. While some gene subtypes have undergone lineage-specific expansions in vertebrates (i.e. cyclins, mitotic kinases,...), others seem to be lost in vertebrates, for instance the novel cyclin B identified in S. purpuratus. On the other hand, some genes which were previously thought to be vertebrate innovations, are also found in sea urchins (i.e. MCM9). To note is also the absence of cell cycle inhibitors of the INK type, which are apparently confined to vertebrates. The uncovered genomic repertoire of cell-cycle regulators will thus provide molecular tools that should further enhance future research on cell cycle control and developmental regulation in this model.     

蛋白激酶C与细胞周期

近年的研究表明,PKC涉及到细胞的周期调节。在酵母细胞和哺乳动物细胞均发现PKC参与细胞周期调控,从而提示PKC可能在进化上是一种保守的细胞周期调节子。一般认为PKC在两个点上对细胞周期起作用,即G1期和G2期到M期的过渡期（G2／M）。在G1期,PKC分别在早G1期和晚G1期作用有所不同,主要作用表现在使细胞停留在G1期的中末阶段,这一过程,主要涉及到抑制肿瘤抑制因子－成视网膜细胞瘤（Rb)蛋白的磷酸化。PKC的主要作用是降低周期素依赖激酶CDK2的活性、降低周期素E和A的表达和增加周期素依赖的周期抑制蛋白p21^WAF1和p27^KIP1的表达;在G2／M期,PKC对细胞周期的调节主要与Cdc2(CDK1)的活性抑制有关。     

Cell cycle: connecting DNA replication to sporulation in Bacillus

Checkpoints have been a staple of eukaryotic cell cycle research for the past decade, but little is known about checkpoints in prokaryotes. New work on sporulation in Bacillus fills that gap by showing that such control systems function to coordinate aspects of the bacterial cell cycle.     

Engagement of DYRK2 in proper control for cell division

Dysregulation of cell cycle machinery causes abnormal cell division, leading to cancer development. To drive cell cycle properly, expression levels of cell cycle regulators are tightly regulated through the cell cycle. Dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 2 (DYRK2) is a Ser/Thr kinase, and its intracellular functions had not been elucidated for decades. Recent studies have shown that DYRK2 down-regulates key molecules on cell cycle control. This review mainly highlights the DYRK2 function during cell division. In addition, we summarize tumor suppressive role of DYRK2 in cancer cells and discuss future research directions for DYRK2 toward the novel cancer therapies.     

Towards understanding the control of the division cycle in animal cells.

The author reviewed the historical process by which classical knowledge of cell division accumulated, to give rise to the molecular biology of the cell cycle, and discussed the perspective of this field of research. The study of the control of cell division began at the turn of the century. It was hypothesized that cell division was a physiological regulation necessary for growing cells to maintain a proper nucleocytoplasmic ratio to survive, which was later substantiated by the finding that amoeba cells could be prevented from dividing by repeated excision of the cytoplasm. However, the observation in Tetrahymena that heat-shocked cells grow exceedingly, but fail to divide, suggested that the cell required the accumulation of a labile "division protein" to initiate division. Mechanisms that control the cell cycle were studied in oocytes by nuclear transplantation and cytoplasmic transfer, and in cultured mammalian cells, protozoa, and Physarum plasmodia by cell fusion. These experiments demonstrated the existence of cytoplasmic factors that control the cell cycle. Maturation promoting factor (MPF) thus discovered in frog oocytes became known to be an ubiquitous cytoplasmic factor that causes the transition from interphase to metaphase in all organisms. The insight into the molecular control of cell growth and division was gained from yeast cell genetics. For biochemical analysis of the cell cycle control, the method to observe the cell cycle in vitro was developed using frog egg extracts. Thus, MPF was identified as a cdc2--cyclin protein complex. Its activity was found to depend on synthesis and phosphorylation of these proteins. However, recently it was found that there were cell cycle phenomena that were difficult to explain in these terms. Various other cellular factors, including nucleocytoplasmic ratio and microtubule assembly, were also found to control MPF, as well as the cell cycle. It remained open to future how these factors control MPF to alter the pattern of the cell cycle.     

Cell cycle alterations and lung cancer

It is now widely accepted that human carcinogenesis is a multi-step process and phenotypic changes during cancer progression reflect the sequential accumulation of genetic alterations in cells. The recent progress of scientific research has notably increased knowledge about biological events involved in lung cancer pathogenesis and progression, thanks to the use of molecular biology and immunohistochemistry techniques. Lots of the genetic alteration found in small cells lung cancer (SCLC) and in not small cells lung cancer (NSCLC) concern the expression of cell cycle genes, actually recognized as onco-suppressor genes and the lack of equilibrium between oncogenes and oncosuppressor genes. The present review of literature widely describes the cell cycle control, the lung cancer molecular pathogenesis, the catalog of known genetic alterations and the recent advances in global expression profiles in lung tumors, on the basis of the various hystological types too. Such data suggest the potential use of this knowledges in clinical practice both as prognostic factors and innovative therapeutic possibilities and they impose the necessity of new studies about cell cycle control and lung carcinogenesis.     

Maintenance of meristem activity under stress: is there an interplay of RSS1‐like proteins with the RBR pathway?

Plants have acquired rapid responses to a constantly changing environment. These adaptive and protective responses are the result of a complex signalling network regulating different aspects, ranging from ion homeostasis to cell cycle control. It is well established that stress inhibits cell division, which negatively impacts plant growth and development and hence results in biomass decrease and yield loss. Therefore understanding the link between stress perception and cell cycle control would allow development of new crops with increased productivity when subjected to stress. However, studies on cell cycle control under stress have been limited to well‐known regulators of the cell cycle such as cyclins and stress‐related phytohormone integrators. The recent discovery of RSS1, a novel intrinsically unstructured protein of rice, opened up new insights into how stress perception can be connected with cell cycle control in meristematic zones. Whereas RSS1 is well conserved among other plant lineages, eudicots present proteins sharing little sequence homology with RSS1. Here, we discuss how RSS1‐like proteins might also be functional in dicots, and possibly act through the retinoblastoma‐related pathway to regulate both S‐phase transition and cell fate in meristems.     

Mathematical models of the early embryonic cell cycle: the role of MPF activation and cyclin degradation

Recent advances in cell biology indicate that the interactions between two proteins, cdc2 and cyclin, together with the activity of the cdc2/cyclin complex called MPF in the cytoplasm form the basis of a universal biochemical control mechanism for the cell division cycle in eukaryotes. Based on experimental facts that total cdc2 level is constant throughout the cell cycle and that onset of mitosis is subsequent to activation of MPF, we propose and analyze two different but related models — an ordinary differential equations model and a delay differential equations model — for the control of the early embryonic cell division cycle. Assuming very general reaction terms in the model equations, it is shown that MPF activation and rapid cyclin degradation triggered by active MPF drive cells to alternate between interphase and mitosis, the two phases of the cell cycle.S. Busenberg passed away on April 3, 1993 from complications of ALS (Lou Gehrig's disease). His research was supported by NSF Grant DMS-9112821Research was carried out at Harvey Mudd College and was supported by NSF Grant HRD-9252994     

Circadian and infradian aspects of the cell cycle: from past to future

A review of some aspects of circadian and infradian rhythms of the cell cycle is given. The background is that the research of the last decade has given entirely new insights into the cell cycle as a dynamic process which occurs in waves. After some short historical notes on the development of methodology for study of cell kinetics, it is reviewed how the strong variability of this function was recognized from the 1960's. This again led to an increasing understanding of the rhythmic pattern of cell renewal in various tissues of the body. Conventional methods for studying cell population kinetics gave general insights into both circadian and infradian rhythms, but were hampered by several shortcomings. The techniques were time consuming, and usually one and only one parameter could be studied at a time. However, this general knowledge both had a strong impact on the understanding of cell kinetics and provided a basis for designing cancer chemotherapy. Today we are facing a new area in the study of cell population kinetics. New, rapid and automated methods for multiparameter studies of both cell kinetics and other biological properties of cell populations have given entirely new possibilities for cell kinetic research. Methods, mainly connected to analytical cytology, can discriminate subpopulations with varying kinetic properties, and also enable monitoring of cell proliferation in normal and malignant tissues of patients. Chronobiology has had a strong impact on the understanding of cell population kinetics in the body. In the light of the new developments in the fields of growth factors and their regulatory influences on the cell cycle, important and fundamental aspects of biological rhythms are now being elucidated.     

Balance between cell division and differentiation during plant development

The processes which make possible that a cell gives rise to two daughter cells define the cell division cycle. In individual cells, this is strictly controlled both in time and space. In multicellular organisms extra layers of regulation impinge on the balance between cell proliferation and cell differentiation within particular ontogenic programs. In contrast to animals, organogenesis in plants is a post-embryonic process that requires developmentally programmed reversion of sets of cells from different differentiated states to a pluripotent state followed by regulated proliferation and progression through distinct differentiation patterns. This implies a fine coupling of cell division control, cell cycle arrest and reactivation, endoreplication and differentiation. The emerging view is that cell cycle regulators, in addition to controlling cell division, also function as targets for maintaining cell homeostasis during development. The mechanisms and cross talk among different cell cycle regulatory pathways are discussed here in the context of a developing plant.     

A quantitative model for cyclin-dependent kinase control of the cell cycle: revisited

The eukaryotic cell division cycle encompasses an ordered series of events. Chromosomal DNA is replicated during S phase of the cell cycle before being distributed to daughter cells in mitosis. Both S phase and mitosis in turn consist of an intricately ordered sequence of molecular events. How cell cycle ordering is achieved, to promote healthy cell proliferation and avert insults on genomic integrity, has been a theme of Paul Nurse's research. To explain a key aspect of cell cycle ordering, sequential S phase and mitosis, Stern & Nurse proposed 'A quantitative model for cdc2 control of S phase and mitosis in fission yeast'. In this model, S phase and mitosis are ordered by their dependence on increasing levels of cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) activity. Alternative mechanisms for ordering have been proposed that rely on checkpoint controls or on sequential waves of cyclins with distinct substrate specificities. Here, we review these ideas in the light of experimental evidence that has meanwhile accumulated. Quantitative Cdk control emerges as the basis for cell cycle ordering, fine-tuned by cyclin specificity and checkpoints. We propose a molecular explanation for quantitative Cdk control, based on thresholds imposed by Cdk-counteracting phosphatases, and discuss its implications.     

Regulation of the product of a possible human cell cycle control gene CDC2Hs in B-cells by alpha-interferon and phorbol ester

The product of the cell cycle control gene cdc2 is required in yeast for transition through both G1 and G2 control points of the cell cycle. The homologous protein in higher eukaryotes has been shown to be a component of the mitosis promoting factor complex and may thus regulate entry through the G2 control point into mitosis. It is suggested from the work presented here that, as in yeast, the human CDC2Hs gene product (p34CDC2Hs) may also play a role in cell cycle control in the G1(G0) phase of the cell cycle. Interferon-alpha inhibits the growth of the human B-cell line Daudi in the G1(G0) phase of the cell cycle and prevents cells from entering S-phase. Culturing the cells with interferon-alpha inhibits the phosphorylation of p34CDC2Hs and causes the down-regulation of CDC2Hs mRNA. Phorbol ester also inhibits the Daudi cell cycle in G1(G0) and causes the inhibition of p34CDC2Hs phosphorylation and a reduction of CDC2Hs mRNA. These studies provide insights into the process of growth control and the cytostatic mechanism of interferon-alpha.     

Cell division in the CNS: protective response or lethal event in post-mitotic neurons?

Cell cycle events have been documented to be associated with several human neurodegenerative diseases. This review focuses on two diseases--Alzheimer's disease and ataxia telangiectasia--as well as their mouse models. Cell cycle studies have shown that ectopic expression of cell cycle markers is spatially and regional correlated well with neuronal cell death in both disease conditions. Further evidence of ectopic cell cycling is found in both human diseases and in its mouse models. These findings suggest that loss of cell cycle control represents a common pathological root of disease, which underlies the defects in the affected brain tissues in both human and mouse. Loss of cell cycle control is a unifying hypothesis for inducing neuronal death in CNS. In the disease models we have examined, cell cycle markers appear before the more well-recognized pathological changes and thus could serve as early stress markers--outcome measures for preclinical trials of potential disease therapies. As a marker these events could serve as a new criterion in human pathological diagnosis. The evidence to date is compatible with the requirement for a second "hit" for a neuron to progress cell cycle initiation and DNA replication to death. If this were true, any intervention of blocking 'second' processes might prevent or slow the neuronal cell death in the process of disease. What is not known is whether, in an adult neuron, the cell cycle event is part of the pathology or rather a desperate attempt of a neuron under stress to protect itself.