No female mate choice in Mallee dragon lizards, Ctenophorus fordi

Aspects of sexual selection were studied in a sexually monomorphic Australian agamid lizard (Ctenophorus fordi), in particular with respect to the sensory exploitation hypothesis. In enclosure trials, females were offered the choice between large vs. small males and, in a different experiment, males with blue vs. normal head color. The rationale for these experiments was: firstly, to establish if females actively solicit copulations; secondly, if so, do females solicit copulations non-randomly with respect to male size (because large males may have access to food resources); thirdly, if male coloration is manipulated to match traits of congeneric, conspicuous and sexually dimorphic species, do females show preference for this novel trait (in accordance with the sensory exploitation hypothesis). The corresponding manipulations were also made in a free-living population where the distribution of females on the home ranges of color-manipulated males were monitored. Blue-headed males were accepted as mating partners both in the staged mating trials and in the natural population. Females appeared not to express any kind of active or passive mate choice (rejection); in only one out of 62 trials did a female approach a male herself rather than being approached by the male(s). There was no discrimination against any male category regardless of size or color within a female's receptive period and the manipulation of male head color in the natural population did not result in spatial re-distribution of females. Thus, a female appears to mate unselectively within her receptive period. Rejection behaviors were used only outside of the receptive period to communicate, to all males, that the female is not receptive.     

The mixed-species chorus as public information: tungara frogs eavesdrop on a heterospecific

Multispecies choruses represent a promising but uninvestigatedforum for public information. Although frogs exposed to a potentialpredator call more readily in the presence of conspecific callsthan in their absence, none are known to make comparable useof heterospecific calls. To test for heterospecific eavesdropping,we isolated calling male túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus),presented them with a potential predator, and recorded theirresponses to playbacks of 1 of 4 stimuli: calls of a conspecific,a sympatric heterospecific (Leptodactylus labialis), an allopatriccongener (Physalaemus enesefae), or silence. We found that malescalled more in response to the L. labialis call than to eitherthe silent stimulus or the P. enesefae call. In contrast, theP. enesefae call did not result in significantly more callingthan the silent stimulus. The conspecific call was the mosteffective at promoting calling. The data indicate that túngarafrogs selectively attend to the call of a heterospecific. Wehypothesize that such heterospecific eavesdropping contributesto the emergent behavior of mixed-species choruses.     

Time flies: time of day and social environment affect cuticular hydrocarbon sexual displays in Drosophila serrata

Recent work on Drosophila cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) challenges a historical assumption that CHCs in flies are largely invariant. Here, we examine the effect of time of day and social environment on a suite of sexually selected CHCs in Drosophila serrata. We demonstrate that males become more attractive to females during the time of day that flies are most active and when most matings occur, but females become less attractive to males during the same time of day. These opposing temporal changes may reflect differences in selection among the sexes. To evaluate the effect of social environment on male CHC attractiveness, we manipulated male opportunity for mating: male flies were housed either alone, with five females, with five males or with five males and five females. We found that males had the most attractive CHCs when with females, and less attractive CHCs when with competitor males. Social environment mediated how male CHC attractiveness cycled: males housed with females and/or other males showed temporal changes in CHC attractiveness, whereas males housed alone did not. In total, our results demonstrate temporal patterning of male CHCs that is dependent on social environment, and suggest that such changes may be beneficial to males.