综述: 组蛋白变体的染色质组装

真核细胞的染色质组装是组蛋白和DNA有序地形成核小体和染色质的过程．通过调节DNA的开放或折叠状态,染色质组装不但影响遗传信息的编码和存储,也决定了遗传信息的提取和解读．作为染色质组装的重要调控因子,组蛋白变体和组蛋白伴侣在与DNA相关的生命活动进程中发挥着至关重要的作用．本文综述了组蛋白变体H2A.Z以及CENP-A进行染色质组装的研究进展,并着重讨论了组蛋白变体和组蛋白伴侣在染色质组装中的重要作用．     

组蛋白H3变体H3.3及其在细胞重编程中的作用

组蛋白是真核生物中一类进化上相对保守的蛋白质。由组蛋白八聚体及缠绕其上的DNA构成的核小体是真核生物染色质的基本组成单位。核小体使DNA保持固缩状态,既能维持基因组的稳定性,又能保证DNA序列可以正确地进行复制、转录、重组和修复。核小体调控细胞的生物过程除了通过组蛋白翻译后修饰,还可以通过组蛋白变体替换的方式进行。研究发现,组蛋白H3变体H3.3与常规组蛋白H3尽管仅有几个氨基酸的区别,但H3.3却能由特异的分子伴侣介导,整合进入染色质的特定区域,从而发挥不同的作用。同时,H3.3作为一种母源因子在正常受精和体细胞核移植等细胞重编程过程中也发挥着重要作用。本文总结了H3.3的结构特点和富集情况,探讨了特异的分子伴侣及其在细胞重编程中的作用,以期为提高体细胞重编程效率提供新思路,为体细胞重编程的应用奠定基础。     

植物组蛋白变体生物学功能

组蛋白变体是重要的表观遗传调控因子,能够在染色质特定位置替换常规组蛋白,维持染色质结构进而保证转录激活或抑制的顺利进行.目前,组蛋白变体的调控功能已成为植物学研究领域的一个热点.近年来,随着植物组蛋白变体生物学功能研究的不断深入,发现组蛋白变体能够在植物生长发育和环境应答调控等多个生物学过程中发挥重要作用.该文简要介绍...     

组蛋白变体及组蛋白替换

组蛋白作为核小体的基本组分,是染色质的结构和功能必需的。对于不同状态的染色质,核小体中会组装入相应的组蛋白变体,并且各种组蛋白变体的尾部也能发生多种修饰。这些变体通过改变核小体的空间构象和稳定性,决定基因转录的激活或沉默,DNA的修复,染色体的异染色化等。在组蛋白替换过程中,组蛋白变体是通过相应的染色质重构复合物组装入核小体,不同的变体有着不同的组装途径。对组蛋白变体的研究是近年来表观遗传学新的研究热点,也是对“组蛋白密码”的新的诠释。并且,组蛋白替换揭示了DNA-组蛋白相互作用变化的一种新的机制。

     

Linker histone subtypes and their allelic variants

Members of histone H1 family bind to nucleosomal and linker DNA to assist in stabilization of higher‐order chromatin structures. Moreover, histone H1 is involved in regulation of a variety of cellular processes by interactions with cytosolic and nuclear proteins. Histone H1, composed of a series of subtypes encoded by distinct genes, is usually differentially expressed in specialized cells and frequently non‐randomly distributed in different chromatin regions. Moreover, a role of specific histone H1 subtype might be also modulated by post‐translational modifications and/or presence of polymorphic isoforms. While the significance of covalently modified histone H1 subtypes has been partially recognized, much less is known about the importance of histone H1 polymorphic variants identified in various plant and animal species, and human cells as well. Recent progress in elucidating amino acid composition‐dependent functioning and interactions of the histone H1 with a variety of molecular partners indicates a potential role of histone H1 polymorphic variation in adopting specific protein conformations essential for chromatin function. The histone H1 allelic variants might affect chromatin in order to modulate gene expression underlying some physiological traits and, therefore could modify the course of diverse histone H1‐dependent biological processes. This review focuses on the histone H1 allelic variability, and biochemical and genetic aspects of linker histone allelic isoforms to emphasize their likely biological relevance.     

Lessons from senescence: Chromatin maintenance in non-proliferating cells

Cellular senescence is an irreversible proliferation arrest, thought to contribute to tumor suppression, proper wound healing and, perhaps, tissue and organismal aging. Two classical tumor suppressors, p53 and pRB, control cell cycle arrest associated with senescence. Profound molecular changes occur in cells undergoing senescence. At the level of chromatin, for example, senescence associated heterochromatic foci (SAHF) form in some cell types. Chromatin is inherently dynamic and likely needs to be actively maintained to achieve a stable cell phenotype. In proliferating cells chromatin is maintained in conjunction with DNA replication, but how non-proliferating cells maintain chromatin structure is poorly understood. Some histone variants, such as H3.3 and macroH2A increase as cells undergo senescence, suggesting histone variants and their associated chaperones could be important in chromatin structure maintenance in senescent cells. Here, we discuss options available for senescent cells to maintain chromatin structure and the relative contribution of histone variants and chaperones in this process. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Histone chaperones and chromatin assembly.     

Identification and characterization of nucleoplasmin 3 as a histone-binding protein in embryonic stem cells

Embryonic stem (ES) cells are thought to have unique chromatin structures responsible for their capacity for self-renewal and pluripotency. To examine this possibility, we sought nuclear proteins in mouse ES cells that specifically bind to histones using a pull-down assay with synthetic peptides of histone H3 and H4 tail domain as baits. Nuclear proteins preferentially bound to the latter. We identified 45 proteins associated with the histone H4 tail and grouped them into four categories: 10 chromatin remodeling proteins, five histone chaperones, two histone modification-related proteins, and 28 other proteins. mRNA expression levels of 20 proteins selected from these 45 proteins were compared between undifferentiated and retinoic acid (RA)-induced differentiated ES cells. All of the genes were similarly expressed in both states of ES cells, except nucleoplasmin 3 (NPM3) that was expressed at a higher level in the undifferentiated cells. NPM3 proteins were localized in the nucleoli and nuclei of the cells and expression was decreased during RA-induced differentiation. When transfected with NPM3 gene, ES cells significantly increased their proliferation compared with control cells. The present study strongly suggests that NPM3 is a chromatin remodeling protein responsible for the unique chromatin structure and replicative capacity of ES cells.     

Nucleosome destabilization in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression

Assembly, mobilization and disassembly of nucleosomes can influence the regulation of gene expression and other processes that act on eukaryotic DNA. Distinct nucleosome-assembly pathways deposit dimeric subunits behind the replication fork or at sites of active processes that mobilize pre-existing nucleosomes. Replication-coupled nucleosome assembly appears to be the default process that maintains silent chromatin, counteracted by active processes that destabilize nucleosomes. Nucleosome stability is regulated by the combined effects of nucleosome-positioning sequences, histone chaperones, ATP-dependent nucleosome remodellers, post-translational modifications and histone variants. Recent studies suggest that histone turnover helps to maintain continuous access to sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins that regulate epigenetic inheritance, providing a dynamic alternative to histone-marking models for the propagation of active chromatin.     

Histone transfer among chaperones

The eukaryotic processes of nucleosome assembly and disassembly govern chromatin dynamics, in which histones exchange in a highly regulated manner to promote genome accessibility for all DNA-dependent processes. This regulation is partly carried out by histone chaperones, which serve multifaceted roles in co-ordinating the interactions of histone proteins with modification enzymes, nucleosome remodellers, other histone chaperones and nucleosomal DNA. The molecular details of the processes by which histone chaperones promote delivery of histones among their many functional partners are still largely undefined, but promise to offer insights into epigenome maintenance. In the present paper, we review recent findings on the histone chaperone interactions that guide the assembly of histones H3 and H4 into chromatin. This evidence supports the concepts of histone post-translational modifications and specific histone chaperone interactions as guiding principles for histone H3/H4 transactions during chromatin assembly.     

Chromatin proteomics and epigenetic regulatory circuits

Many phenotypic changes of eukaryotic cells due to changes in gene expression depend on alterations in chromatin structure. Processes involved in the alteration of chromatin are diverse and include post-translational modifications of histone proteins, incorporation of specific histone variants, methylation of DNA and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Interconnected with these processes are the localization of chromatin domains within the nuclear architecture and the appearance of various classes of noncoding regulatory RNAs. Recent experiments underscore the role of these processes in influencing diverse biological functions. However, the evidence to date implies the importance of an interplay of all these chromatin-changing functions, generating an epigenetic regulatory circuit that is still not well understood.     

Histone variants as emerging regulators of embryonic stem cell identity

Dynamic regulation of chromatin structure is an important mechanism for balancing the pluripotency and cell fate decision in embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Indeed ESCs are characterized by unusual chromatin packaging, and a wide variety of chromatin regulators have been implicated in control of pluripotency and differentiation. Genome-wide maps of epigenetic factors have revealed a unique epigenetic signature in pluripotent ESCs and have contributed models to explain their plasticity. In addition to the well known epigenetic regulation through DNA methylation, histone posttranslational modifications, chromatin remodeling, and non-coding RNA, histone variants are emerging as important regulators of ESC identity. In this review, we summarize and discuss the recent progress that has highlighted the central role of histone variants in ESC pluripotency and ESC fate, focusing, in particular, on H1 variants, H2A variants H2A.X, H2A.Z and macroH2A and H3 variant H3.3.