Intracellular and viral membrane fusion: a uniting mechanism

Structural and functional analyses have revealed remarkable mechanistic similarities between viral and intracellular fusion. Both fusion processes are driven by an orchestrated cascade of protein binding and folding reactions. After an initial tethering step, activation of the fusion machinery links the opposing membranes and protein folding pulls the membranes in close proximity; fusion pores form, open and dilate, and the process culminates in the complete merging of the lipid bilayers. Viral fusion is mediated by a single fusion protein, whereas the intracellular fusion machinery is split into matching halves, the v- and t-SNAREs. SNAREs, together with synaptotagmins, emerge as the key machinery for regulated exocytosis.     

Role of Spike Protein Endodomains in Regulating Coronavirus Entry

Enveloped viruses enter cells by viral glycoprotein-mediated binding to host cells and subsequent fusion of virus and host cell membranes. For the coronaviruses, viral spike (S) proteins execute these cell entry functions. The S proteins are set apart from other viral and cellular membrane fusion proteins by their extensively palmitoylated membrane-associated tails. Palmitate adducts are generally required for protein-mediated fusions, but their precise roles in the process are unclear. To obtain additional insights into the S-mediated membrane fusion process, we focused on these acylated carboxyl-terminal intravirion tails. Substituting alanines for the cysteines that are subject to palmitoylation had effects on both S incorporation into virions and S-mediated membrane fusions. In specifically dissecting the effects of endodomain mutations on the fusion process, we used antiviral heptad repeat peptides that bind only to folding intermediates in the S-mediated fusion process and found that mutants lacking three palmitoylated cysteines remained in transitional folding states nearly 10 times longer than native S proteins. This slower refolding was also reflected in the paucity of postfusion six-helix bundle configurations among the mutant S proteins. Viruses with fewer palmitoylated S protein cysteines entered cells slowly and had reduced specific infectivities. These findings indicate that lipid adducts anchoring S proteins into virus membranes are necessary for the rapid, productive S protein refolding events that culminate in membrane fusions. These studies reveal a previously unappreciated role for covalently attached lipids on the endodomains of viral proteins eliciting membrane fusion reactions.     

Neuronal SNAREs do not trigger fusion between synthetic membranes but do promote PEG-mediated membrane fusion

At low surface concentrations that permit formation of impermeable membranes, neuronal soluble N-ethyl maleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins form a stable, parallel, trans complex when vesicles are brought into contact by a low concentration of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). Surprisingly, formation of a stable SNARE complex does not trigger fusion under these conditions. However, neuronal SNAREs do promote fusion at low protein/lipid ratios when triggered by higher concentrations of PEG. Promotion of PEG-triggered fusion required phosphatidylserine and depended only on the surface concentration of SNAREs and not on the formation of a trans SNARE complex. These results were obtained at protein surface concentrations reported for synaptobrevin in synaptic vesicles and with an optimally fusogenic lipid composition. At a much higher protein/lipid ratio, vesicles joined by SNARE complex slowly mixed lipids at 37 degrees C in the absence of PEG, in agreement with earlier reports. However, vesicles containing syntaxin at a high protein/lipid ratio (>or=1:250) lost membrane integrity. We conclude that the neuronal SNARE complex promotes fusion by joining membranes and that the individual proteins syntaxin and synaptobrevin disrupt membranes so as to favor formation of a stalk complex and to promote conversion of the stalk to a fusion pore. These effects are similar to the effects of viral fusion peptides and transmembrane domains, but they are not sufficient by themselves to produce fusion in our in vitro system at surface concentrations documented to occur in synaptic vesicles. Thus, it is likely that proteins or factors other than the SNARE complex must trigger fusion in vivo.     

SNARE protein analog‐mediated membrane fusion

Fusion of lipid membranes to form a single bilayer is an essential process for life and provides important biological functions including neurotransmitter release. Membrane fusion proteins facilitate approximation of interacting membranes to overcome the energy barrier. In case of synaptic transmission, proteins involved are known as soluble N‐ethylmaleimide‐sensitive‐factor attachment receptor (SNARE) proteins. The SNAREs from synaptic vesicles interact with the SNAREs from the target membrane to form a coiled‐coil bundle of four helices, thus pulling the membranes tightly together and initiating fusion. However, it remains unclear how these proteins function at molecular level. Natural systems are often too complex to obtain unambiguous results. Simple model systems mimicking natural proteins in synthetic lipid bilayers are powerful tools for obtaining insights into this essential biological process. An important advantage of such systems is their well‐defined composition, which can be systematically varied in order to fully understand events at molecular level. In this review, selected model systems are presented based upon specific interactions between recognition units embedded in separate lipid bilayers mimicking native SNARE protein‐mediated membrane fusion. Copyright © 2015 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Effects of proteins on phospholipid vesicle aggregation and lipid vesicle-monolayer interactions

The effects of proteins on divalent cation-induced phospholipid vesicle aggregation and phospholipid vesicle-monolayer membrane interactions (fusion) were examined. Glycophorin (from human erythrocytes) suppressed the membrane interactions more than N-2 protein (from human brain myelin) when these proteins were incorporated into acidic phospholipid vesicle membranes. The threshold concentrations of divalent cations which induced vesicle aggregation were increased by protein incorporation, and the rate of vesicle aggregation was reduced. A similar inhibitory effect by the proteins, incorporated into lipid vesicle membranes, was observed for Ca²⁺-induced lipid vesicle-monolayer interactions. However, when these proteins were incorporated only in the acidic phospholipid monolayers, the interaction (fusion) of the lipid vesicle-monolayer membranes, induced by divalent cations, was not appreciably altered by the presence of the proteins.In contrast to these two proteins, the presence of synexin in the solution did enhance the Ca²⁺-induced aggregation of phosphatidylserine vesicles, but did not seem to affect the degree of Ca²⁺-induced fusion between phosphatidylserine/phosphatidylcholine (1:1) and phosphatidylserine vesicles and monolayer membranes.     

Membrane fusion catalyzed by a Rab, SNAREs, and SNARE chaperones is accompanied by enhanced permeability to small molecules and by lysis

The fusion of sealed biological membranes joins their enclosed aqueous compartments while mixing their membrane bilayers. Reconstituted fusion reactions are commonly assayed by lipid mixing, which can result from either true fusion or from lysis and its attendant reannealing of membranes. Fusion is also frequently assayed by the mixing of lumenal aqueous compartments, using probes of low molecular weight. With several probes (biotin, methylumbelliferyl-N-acetyl-α-D-neuraminic acid, and dithionite), we find that yeast vacuolar SNAREs (SNAP [Soluble NSF attachment protein] Receptors) increase the permeability of membranes to small molecules and that this permeabilization is enhanced by homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting complex (HOPS) and Sec17p/Sec18p, the vacuolar tethering and SNARE chaperone proteins. We now report the development of a novel assay that allows the parallel assessment of lipid mixing, the mixing of intact lumenal compartments, any lysis that occurs, and the membrane permeation of small molecules. Applying this assay to an all-purified reconstituted system consisting of vacuolar lipids, the four vacuolar SNAREs, the SNARE disassembly chaperones Sec17p and Sec18p, the Rab Ypt7p, and the Rab effector/SM protein complex HOPS, we show that true fusion is accompanied by strongly enhanced membrane permeability to small molecules and a measurable rate of lysis.     

Reversible, cooperative reactions of yeast vacuole docking

Homotypic yeast vacuole fusion occurs in three stages: (i) priming reactions, which are independent of vacuole clustering, (ii) docking, in which vacuoles cluster and accumulate fusion proteins and fusion regulatory lipids at a ring-shaped microdomain surrounding the apposed membranes of each docked vacuole, where fusion will occur, and (iii) bilayer fusion/compartment mixing. These stages require vacuolar SNAREs, SNARE-chaperones, GTPases, effector complexes, and chemically minor but functionally important lipids. For each, we have developed specific ligands that block fusion and conditions that reverse each block. Using them, we test whether docking entails a linearly ordered series of catalytic events, marked by sequential acquisition of resistance to inhibitors, or whether docking subreactions are cooperative and/or reversible. We find that each fusion protein and regulatory lipid is needed throughout docking, indicative of a reversible or highly cooperative assembly of the fusion-competent vertex ring. In accord with this cooperativity, vertices enriched in one fusion catalyst are enriched in others. Docked vacuoles finally assemble SNARE complexes, yet still require physiological temperature and lipid rearrangements to complete fusion.     

IFITM3 Restricts Influenza A Virus Entry by Blocking the Formation of Fusion Pores following Virus-Endosome Hemifusion

Interferon-induced transmembrane proteins (IFITMs) inhibit infection of diverse enveloped viruses, including the influenza A virus (IAV) which is thought to enter from late endosomes. Recent evidence suggests that IFITMs block virus hemifusion (lipid mixing in the absence of viral content release) by altering the properties of cell membranes. Consistent with this mechanism, excess cholesterol in late endosomes of IFITM-expressing cells has been reported to inhibit IAV entry. Here, we examined IAV restriction by IFITM3 protein using direct virus-cell fusion assay and single virus imaging in live cells. IFITM3 over-expression did not inhibit lipid mixing, but abrogated the release of viral content into the cytoplasm. Although late endosomes of IFITM3-expressing cells accumulated cholesterol, other interventions leading to aberrantly high levels of this lipid did not inhibit virus fusion. These results imply that excess cholesterol in late endosomes is not the mechanism by which IFITM3 inhibits the transition from hemifusion to full fusion. The IFITM3''s ability to block fusion pore formation at a post-hemifusion stage shows that this protein stabilizes the cytoplasmic leaflet of endosomal membranes without adversely affecting the lumenal leaflet. We propose that IFITM3 interferes with pore formation either directly, through partitioning into the cytoplasmic leaflet of a hemifusion intermediate, or indirectly, by modulating the lipid/protein composition of this leaflet. Alternatively, IFITM3 may redirect IAV fusion to a non-productive pathway, perhaps by promoting fusion with intralumenal vesicles within multivesicular bodies/late endosomes.     

Membrane Fusion

The fusion of biological membranes results in two bilayer-based membranes merging into a single membrane. In this process the lipids have to undergo considerable rearrangement. The nature of the intermediates that are formed during this rearrangement has been investigated. Certain fusion proteins facilitate this process. In many cases short segments of these fusion proteins have a particularly important role in accelerating the fusion process. Studies of the interaction of model peptides with membranes have allowed for increased understanding at the molecular level of the mechanism of the promotion of membrane fusion by fusion proteins. There is an increased appreciation of the roles of several independent segments of fusion proteins in promoting the fusion process.Many of the studies of the fusion of biological membranes have been done with the fusion of enveloped viruses with other membranes. One reason for this is that the number of proteins involved in viral fusion is relatively simple, often requiring only a single protein. For many enveloped viruses, the structure of their fusion proteins has certain common elements, suggesting that they all promote fusion by an analogous mechanism. Some aspects of this mechanism also appears to be common to intracellular fusion, although several proteins are involved in that process which is more complex and regulated than is fusion.     

Distribution and stability of membrane proteins in lipid membranes on solid supports

Bacteriorhodopsin and the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor were biotinylated and reconstituted in lipidic membranes on silicon supports by fusion with proteoliposomes. The presence and distribution of the proteins were studied by binding with streptavidin. Radio-labelled streptavidin was employed for quantifying the amounts of protein remaining in the supported membranes after storage in buffer. The proteins within the membranes remained bound to the surface for weeks. The biological activity of reconstituted unlabelled receptor upon storage showed stability in membranes formed on silicon supports and a reduced stability when formed onto lipid monolayer covered supports. Atomic force microscopy studies on preparations in liquid showed bilayer structures but also attached, partly fused liposomes and membrane particles. In air, the surface was smoother and contained less of liposomes and more of stacked lipid layers. Preparations labelled with streptavidin conjugated to colloidal gold and imaged in air showed the proteins individually distributed, with no protein-rich patches or protein aggregates.     

Identification of an outer segment targeting signal in the COOH terminus of rhodopsin using transgenic Xenopus laevis

Mislocalization of the photopigment rhodopsin may be involved in the pathology of certain inherited retinal degenerative diseases. Here, we have elucidated rhodopsin's targeting signal which is responsible for its polarized distribution to the rod outer segment (ROS). Various green fluorescent protein (GFP)/rhodopsin COOH-terminal fusion proteins were expressed specifically in the major red rod photoreceptors of transgenic Xenopus laevis under the control of the Xenopus opsin promoter. The fusion proteins were targeted to membranes via lipid modifications (palmitoylation and myristoylation) as opposed to membrane spanning domains. Membrane association was found to be necessary but not sufficient for efficient ROS localization. A GFP fusion protein containing only the cytoplasmic COOH-terminal 44 amino acids of Xenopus rhodopsin localized exclusively to ROS membranes. Chimeras between rhodopsin and alpha adrenergic receptor COOH-terminal sequences further refined rhodopsin's ROS localization signal to its distal eight amino acids. Mutations/deletions of this region resulted in partial delocalization of the fusion proteins to rod inner segment (RIS) membranes. The targeting and transport of endogenous wild-type rhodopsin was unaffected by the presence of mislocalized GFP fusion proteins.     

A single vesicle-vesicle fusion assay for in vitro studies of SNAREs and accessory proteins

SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) proteins are a highly regulated class of membrane proteins that drive the efficient merger of two distinct lipid bilayers into one interconnected structure. This protocol describes our fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based single vesicle-vesicle fusion assays for SNAREs and accessory proteins. Both lipid-mixing (with FRET pairs acting as lipophilic dyes in the membranes) and content-mixing assays (with FRET pairs present on a DNA hairpin that becomes linear via hybridization to a complementary DNA) are described. These assays can be used to detect substages such as docking, hemifusion, and pore expansion and full fusion. The details of flow cell preparation, protein-reconstituted vesicle preparation, data acquisition and analysis are described. These assays can be used to study the roles of various SNARE proteins, accessory proteins and effects of different lipid compositions on specific fusion steps. The total time required to finish one round of this protocol is 3–6 d.     

Reconstitution of a protein into lipid vesicles using natural detergents

A method is described for reconstitution of a protein into lipid vesicles using one of the natural detergents lysophosphatidylcholine or lysophosphatidic acid. The intestinal microvillus enzyme, aminopeptidase N (EC 3.4.11.2) is incorporated into lipid vesicles prepared from a total lipid extract of the microvillus membrane. The method is based on fusion of aminopeptidase-lysophospholipid micelles with liposomes prepared by sonication. The incorporation of the protein into the lipid bilayer is analyzed by gel permeation chromatography and sucrose density gradient centrifugation. The coincidence of the protein and lipid profiles is used to evaluate protein incorporation. The incorporation is visualized by electron microscopy with negative staining. The method has the advantage of using natural detergents, lysophospholipids, which are minor but natural constituents of biological membranes. The method could be of value as a tool in studies of mechanisms of insertion of newly synthesized proteins into biological membranes.     

Intra-Golgi protein transport depends on a cholesterol balance in the lipid membrane

Transport of proteins between intracellular membrane compartments is mediated by a protein machinery that regulates the budding and fusion processes of individual transport steps. Although the core proteins of both processes are defined at great detail, much less is known about the involvement of lipids. Here we report that changing the cellular balance of cholesterol resulted in changes of the morphology of the Golgi apparatus, accompanied by an inhibition of protein transport. By using a well characterized cell-free intra-Golgi transport assay, these observations were further investigated, and it was found that the transport reaction is sensitive to small changes in the cholesterol content of Golgi membranes. Addition as well as removal of cholesterol (10 +/- 6%) to Golgi membranes by use of methyl-beta-cyclodextrin specifically inhibited the intra-Golgi transport assay. Transport inhibition occurred at the fusion step. Modulation of the cholesterol content changed the lipid raft partitioning of phosphatidylcholine and heterotrimeric G proteins, but not of other (non) lipid raft proteins and lipids. We suggest that the cholesterol balance in Golgi membranes plays an essential role in intra-Golgi protein transport and needs to be carefully regulated to maintain the structural and functional organization of the Golgi apparatus.     

What drives membrane fusion in eukaryotes?

The fusion of biological membranes is the terminal step of all vesicular trafficking reactions in eukaryotic cells. Therefore, this fusion is fundamental for the transfer of proteins and lipids between different compartments, for exocytosis and for the structural integrity of organelles. In the past decade, many parts of the molecular machinery involved in fusion have been uncovered. Although the mechanisms responsible for mutual recognition and binding of membranes inside eukaryotes are becoming reasonably well known, there is considerable uncertainty as to what causes the actual merging of the lipid bilayer. Two classes of mechanisms have been proposed. Proximity models postulate that very close apposition of membranes suffices to induce fusion. By contrast, pore models propose that continuous proteinaceous pores between apposed membranes could be the basis for fusion.     

Class I and class II viral fusion protein structures reveal similar principles in membrane fusion (Review)

Recent crystal structures of Flavivirus and Alphavirus fusion proteins (class II) confirm two major principles of protein machineries that mediate the merger of two opposing lipid bilayers. First, the fusion protein can bridge both membranes tethered by two membrane anchors. Second, refolding or domain rearrangement steps lead to the positioning of both anchors into close proximity at the same end of an elongated structure. Although these two steps are in principle sufficient to pull two opposing membranes together and initiate membrane fusion, accumulating evidence suggests that the process requires the concerted action of a number of fusion proteins at and outside the contact sites. This review will focus on the structures of viral class I and class II fusion proteins and their similarities in facilitating membrane fusion.     

Membrane-spanning lipids for an uncompromised monitoring of membrane fusion and intermembrane lipid transfer

A Förster resonance energy transfer-based fusion and transfer assay was developed to study, in model membranes, protein-mediated membrane fusion and intermembrane lipid transfer of fluorescent sphingolipid analogs. For this assay, it became necessary to apply labeled reporter molecules that are resistant to spontaneous as well as protein-mediated intermembrane transfer. The novelty of this assay is the use of nonextractable fluorescent membrane-spanning bipolar lipids. Starting from the tetraether lipid caldarchaeol, we synthesized fluorescent analogs with fluorophores at both polar ends. In addition, we synthesized radioactive glycosylated caldarchaeols. These labeled lipids were shown to stretch through bilayer membranes rather than to loop within a single lipid layer of liposomes. More important, the membrane-spanning lipids (MSLs) in contrast to phosphoglycerides proved to be nonextractable by proteins. We could show that the GM2 activator protein (GM2AP) is promiscuous with respect to glycero- and sphingolipid transfer. Saposin (Sap) B also transferred sphingolipids albeit with kinetics different from GM2AP. In addition, we could unambiguously show that the recombinant activator protein Sap C x His₆ induced membrane fusion rather than intermembrane lipid transfer. These findings showed that these novel MSLs, in contrast with fluorescent phosphoglycerolipids, are well suited for an uncompromised monitoring of membrane fusion and intermembrane lipid transfer.     

Class I and class II viral fusion protein structures reveal similar principles in membrane fusion

Recent crystal structures of Flavivirus and Alphavirus fusion proteins (class II) confirm two major principles of protein machineries that mediate the merger of two opposing lipid bilayers. First, the fusion protein can bridge both membranes tethered by two membrane anchors. Second, refolding or domain rearrangement steps lead to the positioning of both anchors into close proximity at the same end of an elongated structure. Although these two steps are in principle sufficient to pull two opposing membranes together and initiate membrane fusion, accumulating evidence suggests that the process requires the concerted action of a number of fusion proteins at and outside the contact sites. This review will focus on the structures of viral class I and class II fusion proteins and their similarities in facilitating membrane fusion.     

Virus membrane fusion

Membrane fusion of enveloped viruses with cellular membranes is mediated by viral glycoproteins (GP). Interaction of GP with cellular receptors alone or coupled to exposure to the acidic environment of endosomes induces extensive conformational changes in the fusion protein which pull two membranes into close enough proximity to trigger bilayer fusion. The refolding process provides the energy for fusion and repositions both membrane anchors, the transmembrane and the fusion peptide regions, at the same end of an elongated hairpin structure in all fusion protein structures known to date. The fusion process follows several lipidic intermediate states, which are generated by the refolding process. Although the major principles of viral fusion are understood, the structures of fusion protein intermediates and their mode of lipid bilayer interaction, the structures and functions of the membrane anchors and the number of fusion proteins required for fusion, necessitate further investigations.     

Lipids as modulators of membrane fusion mediated by viral fusion proteins

Enveloped viruses infect host cells by fusion of viral and target membranes. This fusion event is triggered by specific glycoproteins in the viral envelope. Fusion glycoproteins belong to either class I, class II or the newly described third class, depending upon their arrangement at the surface of the virion, their tri-dimensional structure and the location within the protein of a short stretch of hydrophobic amino acids called the fusion peptide, which is able to induce the initial lipid destabilization at the onset of fusion. Viral fusion occurs either with the plasma membrane for pH-independent viruses, or with the endosomal membranes for pH-dependent viruses. Although, viral fusion proteins are parted in three classes and the subcellular localization of fusion might vary, these proteins have to act, in common, on lipid assemblies. Lipids contribute to fusion through their physical, mechanical and/or chemical properties. Lipids can thus play a role as chemically defined entities, or through their preferential partitioning into membrane microdomains called "rafts", or by modulating the curvature of the membranes involved in the fusion process. The purpose of this review is to make a state of the art on recent findings on the contribution of cholesterol, sphingolipids and glycolipids in cell entry and membrane fusion of a number of viral families, whose members bear either class I or class II fusion proteins, or fusion proteins of the recently discovered third class.