非小细胞肺癌脑转移瘤综合治疗的预后影响因素分析

目的:研究综合治疗的非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)脑转移瘤患者生存预后影响因素,为NSCLC脑转移瘤的治疗提供更多的参考依据。方法:收集83例诊断为NSCLC脑转移瘤的患者进行回顾性研究,随访后建立临床资料数据库,采用单因素分析及Cox回归模型分析不同因素对非小细胞肺癌脑转移瘤患者生存期的影响。结果:患者中位生存期为11个月,6月、12月、18月的生存率分别为79.0%、32.7%、19.4%。经单因素和多因素分析结果显示脑转移瘤的病理类型、原发灶控制情况、治疗方式、靶向治疗是NSCLC脑转移生存的独立影响预后因素。单发转移瘤中,手术联合全脑放疗(Whole brain radiotherapy,WBRT)与手术相比风险率(hazard rate,HR)为0.645(P>0.05),说明联合方式并没有在生存中获益。多发转移瘤中,手术与WBRT相结合与单纯手术对比HR=0.297(P<0.05),有统计学意义。结论:病理类型为非腺癌,原发灶未得到控制,治疗方式不当以及未应用靶向治疗是NSCLC脑转移瘤的独立危险因素。对于单发脑转移瘤患者的局部治疗,单独手术治疗可能具有更高的优势;对于多发脑转移瘤患者的局部治疗,手术与WBRT联合可能具有更多的生存获益。     

非小细胞肺癌的免疫治疗进展

肺癌是最致命的恶性肿瘤之一,也是男性肿瘤患者致死率最高的,5年生存率低于18%。尽管非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)在手术治疗、化疗、放疗以及靶向治疗方面均取得了一定的成果,但晚期NSCLC的预后依然很差。免疫治疗为NSCLC患者提供了一个新的治疗方向。免疫治疗目前主要研究方向在免疫检查点抑制剂(Ipilimumab、Nivolumab、MK-3475)和肿瘤疫苗(MAGE-A3,L-BLP25,TG4010,Belagenpumatucel-L)等。免疫治疗具有针对性强、副作用少、效率高的特点,并在Ⅱ、Ⅲ期临床试验中取得了较好的疗效,成为在手术、化疗、放疗以及靶向治疗后一种新的重要治疗手段。本文就当前非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗原理、临床试验及待解决问题作一综述。     

Stereotactic radiotherapy for early lung cancer: Evidence-based approach and future directions

AimTo review key studies evaluating stereotactic radiotherapy in the setting of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for inoperable or high-risk patients, and discuss areas of ongoing research and clinical trials.BackgroundThe use of stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has increased rapidly over the past decade. Numerous studies have reported outcomes for patients treated with SBRT who are unfit for surgical resection, or at high risk of surgical complications.Materials and methodsA narrative review.ResultsThe preponderance of evidence suggests that SBRT is associated with excellent local control (∼90% at 3 years) and a favorable toxicity profile. In patients with higher operative risks, such as the elderly and patients with severe COPD, SBRT may provide a less-toxic treatment than surgery with similar oncologic outcomes. Ongoing studies are evaluating the use of SBRT for locally advanced or oligometastatic NSCLC.ConclusionsA large body of evidence now exists to support the use of SBRT for early-stage NSCLC. Decisions regarding the optimal choice of treatment should be individualized, and made in the context of a multidisciplinary team.     

Napromienianie dwa razy dziennie podwyższoną dawką frakcyjną chorych z przerzutami nowotworów złośliwych do mózgu. Wyniki końcowe prospektywnego badania klinicznego w nierandomizowanej grupie chorych

AimTo evaluate the morbidity and effectivness of twice a day hypofractionation in patients with brain metastases.Material / methodsBetween 1992 and 2000, 116 patients with brain metastases have been treated with whole brain radiotherapy alone and only in 33 patients radiotherapy was applied as adjuvant treatment after surgery. Radiotherapy was given in two of 3 Gy fractions daily with minimum 6 hours intervals between fractions to total dose of 39 Gy. Mean age of treated patients was 55 years. All patients were in general performance status evaluated according to the Karnofsky Performance Scale of at least 50.ResultsEarly tolerance of treatment was acceptable. Of 116 patients only 20 patients were treated with supportive treatment (anti-oedema drugs). Improvement of the neurological status was obtained in 26 patients (22%). The one-year overall survival was 21%. The one–year survival without clinical progression of disease was observed in 10% of all treated patients. Patients with solitary brain metastases treated with surgery and radiotherapy showed the best results.ConclusionsOur results showed that twice a day hypo-fractionation radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases is well tolerated and may provides benefit.     

Biology of brain metastases and novel targeted therapies: Time to translate the research

Brain metastases (BM) occur in 20% to 40% of patients with cancer and result in significant morbidity and poor survival. The main therapeutic options include surgery, whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery and chemotherapy. Although significant progress has been made in diagnostic and therapeutic methods, the prognosis in these patients remains poor. Furthermore, the poor penetrability of chemotherapy agents through the blood brain barrier (BBB) continues to pose a challenge in the management of this disease. Preclinical evidence suggests that new targeted treatments can improve local tumor control but our clinical experience with these agents remains limited. In addition, several clinical studies with these novel agents have produced disappointing results. This review will examine the knowledge of targeted therapies in BM. The preclinical and clinical evidence of their use in BM induced by breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma will be presented. In addition, we will discuss the role of antiangiogenic and radiosensitising agents in the treatment of BM and the current strategies available to increase BBB permeability. A better understanding of the mechanism of action of these agents will help us to identify the best targets for testing in future clinical studies.     

非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗的研究进展

肺癌(lung cancer)是全球发病率及死亡率最高的恶性肿瘤之一,非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)占肺癌的85%,其五年生存率只有15%,传统的抗肿瘤治疗方法(手术、放疗和化疗等)在抑制肿瘤进展中的作用有限,即使有手术机会,也有40%以上患者出现局部复发或远处转移。目前多学科治疗较大程度提高了晚期NSCLC的生存期,研究表明,免疫治疗(immunotherapy)可改善肺癌的预后,有望成为肺癌的重要辅助治疗方式。其中,治疗性肿瘤疫苗(vaccination)如MAGE-A3、L-BLP25、Belagenpum atucel-L等、免疫检查点抑制剂(immune checkpoint inhibition)如ipilimumab、nivolumab、pembrolizumab等得到广泛关注。一系列临床试验表明免疫治疗可以使非小细胞肺癌的死亡率得到缓解,本文就其原理、临床试验、不良反应及有待解决问题的临床研究作系统综述。     

Local failure after primary radiotherapy in lung cancer: Is there a role for SBRT?

AimOur purpose is to construe the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of lung cancer from our early experience with SBRT for salvage treatment in patients with recurrent lung cancer after initial radiation therapy.BackgroundLocoregional recurrences are a frequent challenge in patients treated with radio-chemotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC. Conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is rarely given as salvage treatment because of the risk of toxicity. There is a paucity of published studies evaluating the role of SBRT in this clinical setting.Materials and methodsBetween 2008 and present, 10 patients with biopsy proven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) underwent 14 radiosurgical procedures for salvage therapy after failing initial radiation treatment. Patients’ age ranged from 54 to 88 years with a median of 74 years in 6 males and 4 females. Intervals from initial radiation treatment to salvage SBRT were 3–33 months with a median of 13 months. SBRT treatments were delivered using Intensity Modulated Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT). All patients received concomitant chemotherapy.ResultsOverall survival after salvage radiosurgery ranged from 6 to 41 months (mean 20 months, median 18 months). Four of the ten patients are alive with disease locally controlled. Of the remaining 6 patients, 4 had distant progression of disease with brain metastases and one had both brain and lung metastases. The other patient had a regional failure. Toxicities were found in three of the ten (30%) patients with grade I pneumonitis.ConclusionIn our early experience, salvage SBRT is an effective modality of treating patients who failed after conventional irradiation, achieving excellent results in terms of local control with acceptable toxicity. Further prospective studies are needed to determine optimal fractionation schemes.     

Radiotherapy in lung cancer. Mandatory or optional?

The purpose of the paper is to outline the current treatment strategies in lung cancer focusing on the possibile role of radiotherapy. METHOD: It defines the place of radiotherapy at the main histological types and stadiums proposing indications according to evidence based medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy is mandatory in non-operated NSCLC st. I-II in perioperative or palliative management of superior sulcus tumours; in the combined modality treatment of limited SCLC and in postoperative adjustment of resected single brain metastasis of lung cancer. It is optional after NSCLC segmentectomy; in palliation or postoperative adjuvation of NSCLC st. III Radiotherapy can be chosen as a part of best supportive care at NSCLC st. IV extensive SCLC and in case of multiple brain or localised lytic bone metastases.     

非小细胞肺癌体部寡转移的立体定向放射治疗

非小细胞肺癌(Non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)寡转移是NSCLC转移过程中的一种中间状态,是肿瘤生物侵袭过程中较温和的一个阶段,它介于原发灶与远处广泛转移之间,转移瘤数目≦5个,受累器官≦2个,此时肿瘤细胞尚不具备全身播散的倾向。晚期恶性肿瘤患者很大部分处于寡转移状态,而约30%的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者死于寡转移,目前对于寡转移的治疗以局部治疗为主(包括手术、放疗以及射频消融)。治疗隐匿性转移灶、寡转移灶及全身化学治疗结束后清除残留局部病灶成为治疗寡转移的关键,越来越得到专家共识。在无法手术或者拒绝手术的患者中,局部放放射治疗凸显巨大优势,尤其是体部立体定向放射治疗(Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, SBRT),大量临床研究结果显示体部立体定向放射治疗NSCLC寡转移是安全有效的,并能提高转移灶的局部控制率。本文旨在对SBRT治疗非小细胞肺癌寡转移的临床进展做一综述。     

Tumor vasculature as a therapeutic target in non-small cell lung cancer

Despite developments in conventional (chemo)radiotherapy and surgery, survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains poor. Treatments with targeted molecular drugs offer novel therapeutic strategies. Bevacizumab, a recombinant anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody, is the antiangiogenic drug at the most advanced stage of development in the therapy of NSCLC. However, a number of questions and future challenges relating to the use of bevacizumab in NSCLC remain. Furthermore, novel agents targeting the pre-existing NSCLC vasculature (i.e. vascular disrupting agents, VDAs) or multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors have emerged as unique drug classes delivering promising results in several preclinical and clinical studies. Herein, we review the most recent data using these novel targeted agents either alone or in combination with chemotherapy in NSCLC.     

EGFR突变与替莫唑胺联合IGRT大分割放射治疗非小细胞肺癌脑转移瘤疗效的相关性

摘要 目的：研究表皮生长因子受体（EGFR）突变对替莫唑胺联合图像引导大分割放射（IGRT）治疗非小细胞肺癌脑转移瘤临床疗效的影响。方法：选择2015年1月到2018年12月在我院接受治疗的非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者86例,根据是否出现EGFR突变分为对照组（EGFR未突变组）和研究组（EGFR突变组）,每组43人,两组患者均接受替莫唑胺联合IGRT大分割放射治疗。比较两组患者临床治疗疗效、不良反应发生情况、复发时间、生存时间和生活质量。结果：研究组患者临床治疗总有效率较对照组患者高（P<0.05）。研究组患者治疗后复发时间和生存时间均显著高于对照组患者（P<0.05）。两组患者治疗期间头痛、恶心、疲乏以及神经毒性等不良反应的发生情况比较无显著差异（P>0.05）。两组患者治疗前生活质量KarnofSky活动状态评分（KPS）和肺癌相关症状量表（LCSS评分）无显著差异（P>0.05）;治疗后,研究组患者KPS评分显著高于对照组（P<0.05）,而LCSS评分显著低于对照组患者（P<0.05）。结论：替莫唑胺联合IGRT大分割放射治疗EGFR突变的非小细胞肺癌脑转移瘤临床疗效更好,并且治疗后患者生活质量更优。     

Management of non-small cell lung cancer in the era of personalized medicine

Despite major advances in the molecular definition of the disease, screening and therapy, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still characterized by a disappointing overall survival, depending on subtype and tumor stage. To address this challenge, in the last years the therapeutic algorithm of NSCLC has become much more complex and articulated, with different kinds of drugs, including chemotherapy, targeted-based agents, angiogenesis inhibitors and immunotherapy, and multiple lines of treatments, for patients with squamous and non-squamous hystology, EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement. This short viewpoint describes the emerging strategies for the management of NSCLC, indicating how a personalized approach, characterized by a specific multidisciplinary involvement, implies a process that starts with early detection and includes surgery and systemic therapy.     

Long-term survival results after treatment for oligometastatic brain disease

AimThe aim of this study was to characterize the survival results of patients with up to four brain metastases after intense local therapy (primary surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy) if extracranial metastases were absent or limited to one site, e.g. the lungs.BackgroundOligometastatic disease has repeatedly been reported to convey a favorable prognosis.Material and methodsThis retrospective study included 198 German and Norwegian patients treated with individualized approaches, always including brain radiotherapy. Information about age, extracranial spread, number of brain metastases, performance status and other variables was collected. Uni- and multivariate tests were performed.ResultsMedian survival was 16.5 months (single brain metastasis) and 9.8 months (2–4, comparable survival for 2, 3 and 4), respectively (p = 0.001). After 5 years, 15 and 2% of the patients were still alive. In patients alive after 2 years, added median survival was 23 months and the probability of being alive 5 years after treatment was 26%. In multivariate analysis, extracranial metastases were not significantly associated with survival, while primary tumor control was.ConclusionLong-term survival beyond 5 years is possible in a minority of patients with oligometastatic brain disease, in particular those with a single brain metastasis. The presence of extracranial metastases to one site should not be regarded a barrier towards maximum brain-directed therapy.     

Innovative Therapy,Monoclonal Antibodies and Beyond

The seventh Edition of “Innovative Therapy, Monoclonal Antibodies and Beyond” Meeting took place in Milan, Italy, on January 27, 2017. The two sessions of the meeting were focused on: 1) Preclinical assays and novel biotargets; and 2) monoclonal antibodies, cell therapies and targeted molecules. Between these two sessions, a lecture entitled “HLA-antigens modulation and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy” was also presented. Despite the impressive successes in cancer immunotherapy in recent years, the response to immune based interventions occurs only in a minority of patients (∼20%). Several basic and translational mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) were discussed during the meeting: 1. the impact of tumor microenvironment on the activity of immune system; 2. strategies to inhibit the cross-talk between extracellular matrix and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in the preclinical setting; 3. microRNA expression as a biomarker and as a target of therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); 4. the significance of complement activation pathways in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors; 5. the immunosuppressive activity of the microbiota by inducing IL-17 producing cells; and 6. modulation of HLA antigens as possible markers of response to ICB therapy. In order to overcome the deficiency in active anti-tumor T cells, several clinically applicable combination strategies were also discussed: 1. strategies to enhance the anticancer effects of immunogenic cell death inducing-chemotherapy; 2. the use of CAR T-cells in solid tumors; 3. the use of combination strategies involving oncolytic viruses and ICBs; 4. combinations of new ICBs with anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 therapy; and 4. combinations of targeted therapies and ICBs in melanoma. Overall, this conference emphasized the many novel strategies that are being investigated to improve the overall patient response to cancer immunotherapy. Optimization of biomarkers to accurately select patients who will respond to immunotherapy, coupled with combination strategies to improve long term patient survival remain critical challenges in the immuno-oncology field.     

Whole Brain Radiotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

The aim of the present meta-analysis is to evaluate the response rate, median survival time (MST) and toxicity in patients with brain metastases (BM) originating from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and who were treated using either whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plus concurrent chemotherapy or WBRT alone.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, clinical trials and current controlled trials were searched to identify any relevant publications. After screening the literature and undertaking quality assessment and data extraction, the meta-analysis was performed using Stata11.0 software.

Results

In total, six randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving 910 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the analysis indicate that WBRT plus concurrent chemotherapy was more effective at improving response rate (RR = 2.06, 95% CI [1.13, 3.77]; P = 0.019) than WBRT alone. However, WBRT plus concurrent chemotherapy did not improve median survival time (MST) (HR = 1.09, 95%CI [0.94, 1.26]; P = 0.233) or time of neurological progression (CNS-TTP) (HR = 0.93, 95%CI [0.75, 1.16]; P = 0.543), and increased adverse events (Grade≥3) (RR = 2.59, 95% CI [1.88, 3.58]; P = 0.000). There were no significant differences in Grade 3–5 neurological or hematological toxicity between two patient groups (RR = 1.08, 95%CI [0.23, 5.1]; P = 0.92).

Conclusion

The combination of chemotherapy plus WBRT in patients with BM originating from NSCLC may increase treatment response rates of brain metastases with limited toxicity. Although the therapy schedule did not prolong MST or CNS-TTP, further assessment is warranted.     

Dose escalation using 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in management of non-small cell lung cancer; preliminary results on 22 patients

PurposeTo determine the feasibility of radiation dose escalation > 70 Gy to Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) using 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3-DCRT).Methods and MaterialsFrom December 1997 to November 1998, 22 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were included. Tumour stage was I in 3 cases, II in 6 cases, III in 10 cases, and there were 3 locoregional recurrences after surgery. A 3-D treatment planning system with BEV was used for all patients. Patients underwent limited elective nodal irradiation of 56 Gy. The GTV with 1 cm margin received a dose of at least 70 Gy. Acute and late toxicity were estimated according to the RTOG/EORTC score.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 217 (80–360) days. Seventeen patients received 74 Gy, two had 72 Gy, and one had 70 Gy. In one patient with the largest irradiation volume a toxic death due to radiation pneumonitis occured. Except this fatality acute toxicity was acceptable. Seventeen patients were evaluable for response. There were 3 (18%) complete responses, all in patients staged I and II, seven (41%) partial responses, 5 (29%) non-responses and two (12%) local progressions. Two local progressions and two distant failures occured in stage III patients.ConclusionsDose escalation >70 Gy using 3-DCRT in management of NSCLC is feasible with acceptable acute toxicity.     

Tolerability and toxicity of prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer – Results of a phase II study (with estimation of hematological toxicity,pituitary function and magnetic resonance spectra changes)

AimTo evaluate the tolerability and toxicity of PCI in patients with NSCLC.BackgroundProphylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is a standard treatment for patients with small cell lung cancer. There are data showing a decreasing ratio of brain metastases after PCI for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC-non small cell lung cancer) patients but, so far, there is no evidence for increasing overall survival. The main concern in this setting is the tolerance and toxicity of the treatment.Materials and methodsFrom 1999 to 2007, 50 patients with NSCLC treated with radical intent underwent PCI (30 Gy in 15 fractions). Mean follow-up was 2.8 years. The tolerability and hematological toxicity were evaluated in all patients, a part of participants had done neuropsychological tests, magnetic resonance imaging with ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra, and estimation of pituitary function.ResultsDuring follow-up, 20 patients developed distant metastases, 4-brain metastases. Fourteen (30%) patients had acute side effects: (headache, nausea, erythema of the skin). The symptoms did not require treatment breaks. Six patients complained of late side effects (vertigo, nausea, anxiety, lower extremity weakness, deterioration of hearing and olfactory hyperesthesia). Hematological complications were not observed. Testosterone levels tended to decrease (p = 0.062). Visual-motor function deteriorated after treatment (p < 0.059). Performance IQ decreased (p < 0.025) and the difference between performance IQ and verbal IQ increased (p < 0.011). Degenerative periventricular vascular changes were observed in two patients. Analysis of the spectroscopic data showed metabolic but reversible alterations after PCI.ConclusionPCI in the current series was well tolerated and associated with a relatively low toxicity.     

Serum Biomarkers Associated with Clinical Outcomes Fail to Predict Brain Metastases in Patients with Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers

BackgroundLung cancers account for the majority of brain metastases which pose major therapeutic challenges. Biomarkers prognosticating for the development of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) may improve personalized care. Six serum proteomic biomarkers were previously investigated at Memorial Sloan Kettering but their associations with brain metastases were unknown.MethodsSerum NSE, CYFRA 21–1, ProGRP, SCC-Ag, TIMP1, and HE4 by ELISA-based proteomic assays were prospectively collected from consecutive patients with stage IV NSCLC. Pre-treatment serum biomarker levels as well as age, histology, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status were evaluated for association with the baseline presence of brain metastases using logistic regression and multivariable analysis. For patients without brain metastases at baseline, the cumulative incidence of subsequent brain metastases were compared according to baseline biomarkers and clinical factors using Gray’s test.ResultsA total of 118 patients were enrolled, 31 (26%; 95% CI 0.19–0.35) had brain metastases at baseline and a further 26 (22%; 95% CI 0.15–0.30) developed brain metastases subsequently. Pre-treatment serum biomarker levels were available in 104 patients. There was no significant association between the six serum biomarkers and the baseline presence or subsequent development of brain metastases. Age younger than 65 years was the only clinical factor significantly associated with brain metastasis at baseline (OR 3.00; 95% CI 1.22–7.34, P = 0.02) by multivariable analysis. A trend toward increased cumulative incidence of subsequent brain metastases was observed in patients with EGFR mutation (p = 0.2), but this was not statistically significant possibly due to small sample size.ConclusionsSerum NSE, CYFRA 21–1, Pro-GRP, SCC-Ag, TIMP1, and HE4 are not significantly associated with brain metastases. Our methods taking into account follow-up time may be applied to independent datasets to identify a patient cohort with a higher biologic propensity for developing brain metastases. Such information may be useful for the study of agents targeting the development of brain metastases.     

Motexafin gadolinium injection for the treatment of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Despite recent advances in technology, targeting, and chemotherapy, brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a significant problem. The vast majority of patients with this diagnosis undergo whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). However, outcomes are still quite poor with median survivals measured in only months. In an effort to enhance outcomes from external beam radiation treatments, radiosensitizers have been investigated. Motexafin gadolinium (MGd) (Xcytrin, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is a novel radiation sensitizer with a unique mechanism of action that may increase the therapeutic index of WBRT for patients with brain metastases, particularly in those with NSCLC histologies. Here we review the rationale for the use of this drug as well as its current and future role as a radiation enhancer in the management of NSCLC brain metastasis.