Topography of somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation in patients with cerebral lesions

Scalp distributions and topographies of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation were studied in 22 patients with 5 different types of cerebral lesion due to cerebrovascular disease or tumor (thalamic, postcentral subcortical, precentral subcortical, diffuse subcortical and parieto-occipital lesions) in order to investigate the origins of frontal (P20, N24) and central-parietal SEPs (N20, P22, P23).In 2 patients with thalamic syndrome, N16 was delayed in latency and N20/P20 were not recorded. No early SEP except for N16 was recorded in 2 patients with pure hemisensory loss due to postcentral subcortical lesion. In all 11 patients with pure hemiparesis or hemiplegia due to precentral subcortical lesion N20/P20 and P22, P23/N24 components were of normal peak latencies. The amplitude of N24 was significantly decreased in all 3 patients with complete hemiplegia. These findings support the hypothesis that N20/P20 are generated as a horizontal dipole in the central sulcus (3b), whereas P23/N24 are a reflection of multiple generators in pre- and post-rolandic fissures. P22 was very localized in the central area contralateral to the stimulation.Topographical studies of early cortical SEPs are useful for detecting each component in abnormal SEPs     

Bit-mapped imaging of somatosensory evoked potentials after stimulation of the posterior tibial nerves and dorsal nerve of the penis / clitoris

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to unilateral or bilateral posterior tibial nerve (PTN) stimulation and to stimulation of the dorsal nerve (DN) of the penis / clitoris were recorded on 32 channels in 10 volunteers. SEPs to unilateral PTN stimulation consisted of the classic ‘W’ complex P38-N45-P56-N75 maximal on the ipsilateral central and parietal leads, and two negative waves, N33 and N37, maximal on the contralateral post- and prerolandic areas, respectively. A lemniscal P30 was also recorded. Bilateral PTN stimulation caused, by algebraic summation, the disappearance of both N33 and N37; the W complex was symmetrical and the amplitude of P30 increased. The SEPs to DN stimulation were also symmetrical, and N33 and N37 were absent. These features can be explained by the bilateral character of DN stimulation. They also differed from bilateral PTN SEPs in 3 respects; the absence of P30, the small amplitude and the weaker gradients of field distribution of the ‘W’ complex, and the somewhat different distribution of penile from clitoral or bilateral PTN, N45 and P56. These differences can be explained both by physiological (the different fiber composition of the DN) and anatomical (the deeper localization of the DN cortical receiving area) mechanisms.     

Effect of manipulation and fractionated finger movements on subcortical sensory activity in man

Previous studies have shown that the somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) recorded from the scalp are modified or gated during motor activity in man. Animal studies show corticospinal tract terminals in afferent relays, viz. dorsal horn of spinal cord, dorsal column nuclei and thalamus. Is the attenuation of the SEP during movement the result of gating in subcortical nuclei? This study has investigated the effect of manipulation and fractionated finger movements of the hand on the subcortically generated short latency SEPs in 9 healthy subjects. Left median nerve SEPs were recorded with electrodes optimally placed to record subcortical activity with the least degree of contamination. There was no statistically significant change in amplitude or latency of the P9, N11, N13, P14, N18 and N20 potentials during rest or voluntary movement of the fingers of the left hand or manipulation of objects placed in the hand. The shape of the N13 wave form was not modified during these 3 conditions. It is concluded that in man attenuation of cortical waves during manipulation is not due to an effect of gating in the subcortical sensory relay nuclei.     

Monitoring of subcortical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy: comparison with stump pressure levels

Monitoring of multichannel somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) has been performed in 40 cases of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). SEPs were obtained after median nerve stimulation at wrist, recording from 2nd cervical and from the scalp parietal (ipsi- and contralateral) and central (contralateral) positions. The reduction of CBF due to clamping of the carotid artery provoked SEP abnormalities in 10 of the 40 cases. None of the 30 patients with unmodified SEPs developed post-surgical neurological sequelae.SEP alterations were characterized exclusively by amplitude decrements and latency increases of the cortical components, the subcortical ones being unaffected. In 5 of these patients, SEPs returned to normal values before the end of the intervention and no neurological deficit was observed on awakening. In the remaining 5 cases SEPs retained their abnormalities and patients developed post-surgery neurological sequelae (4 immediately, 1 the day after).SEP alterations affected parietal and central components to a similar extent; however, in a few cases cerebral blood flow deficits provoked by carotid clamping modified differently the central P22 and the parietal N20–P25 waves.Comparisons with stump (back) pressure in the carotid artery revealed a higher sensitivity of the SEP technique in detecting vascularization problems due to carotid clamping.The time course of the appearance of SEP abnormalities seems to discriminate alterations secondary to collateral revascularization from those determined by embolization.     

Discrepancy between SEPs directly recorded from the dorsal column nuclei following upper and lower limb stimulation in patients with syringomyelia

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in response to electrical stimulation of the median nerve (MN) and posterior tibial nerve (PTN) were studied in 2 patients with syringomyelia. Intraoperative recordings were made from the surface of the dorsal column nuclei as well as from the scalp. Following MN stimulation, there was a preservation of scalp-recorded P9, P11, P13 and N20, however, there was an absence of spinal N13-P13. The dorsal column SEPs to MN stimulation were normal, characterized by a major negativity (N1), preceded by a small positivity (P1) and followed by a large positivity (P2). On the other hand, there was little or no cortical response (P37) to PTN stimulation. The dorsal column SEPs to PTN stimulation showed a disappearance of the normal P1′-N1′-P2′ configuration, being replaced by a series of small spiky waves. The syringomyelic cavity may have thus compressed the gracile dorsal column which courses more medially than the cuneate pathway, causing desynchronization of the dorsal column SEPs. These findings suggest that dorsal column pathway arising from the lower limb is more vulnerable than that from the upper limb when a cervical syrinx is present.     

Direct recording of somatosensory evoked potentials in the vicinity of the dorsal column nuclei in man: their generator mechanisms and contribution to the scalp far-field potentials

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in the vicinity of the dorsal column nuclei in response to electrical stimulation of the median nerve (MN) and posterior tibial nerve (PTN) were studied by analyzing the wave forms, topographical distribution, effects of higher rates of stimulation and correlation with components of the scalp-recorded SEPs. Recordings were done on 4 patients with spasmodic torticollis during neurosurgical operations for microvascular decompression of the eleventh nerve. The dorsal column SEPs to MN stimulation (MN-SEPs) were characterized by a major negative wave (N1; 13 msec in mean latency), preceded by a small positivity (P1) and followed by a large positive wave (P2). Similar wave forms (P1′-N1′-P2′) were obtained with stimulation of PTN (PTN-SEPs), with a mean latency of N1′ being 28 msec. Maximal potentials of MN-SEPs and PTN-SEPs were located in the vicinity of the ipsilateral cuneate and gracile nuclei, respectively, at a level slightly caudal to the nuclei. The latencies of P1 and N1 increased progressively at more rostral cervical cord segments and medulla, but that of P2 did not. A higher rate of stimulation (16 Hz) caused no effects on P1 and N1, while it markedly attenuated the P2 component. These findings suggest that P1 and N1 of MN-SEPs, as well as P1′ and N1′ of PTN-SEPs, are generated by the dorsal column fibers, and P2 and P2′ are possibly of postsynaptic origin in the respective dorsal column nuclei.The peak latency of N1 recorded on the cuneate nucleus was identical with the scalp-recorded far-field potential of P13–14 in all patients, while no scalp components were found which corresponded to P2. These findings support the previous assumption that the scalp-recorded P13–14 is generated by the presynaptic activities of the dorsal column fibers at their terminals in the cuneate nucleus.     

Somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by dorsal penile and posterior tibial nerve stimulation

SEPs were elicited by stimulation of the dorsal penile nerve (DPN) or posterior tibial nerve (PTN) under 3 conditions of stimulation: random and constant interstimulus intervals, and subject-initiated stimulation. Within these conditions, the effects of repeated stimulation were also examined. The latency of the N90 peak decreased with repeated stimulation. N90 amplitude decreased with increased foreknowledge as well as with repeated stimulation. Factors extracted by principal components analysis revealed similar effects. A difference between DPN and PTN stimulation was seen in a factor associated with the N90 peak, wherein the condition involving subject self-initiation of the stimulus reflected a significantly greater decrease in SEP amplitude when the DPN was stimulated. Morphological commonalities were observed in the SEPs elicited by DPN and PTN for a given subject.     

Electric and CO2 laser SEPs in a patient with asymptomatic syringomyelia

We recorded electrically stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials (electric SEPs) and pain-related SEPs following CO₂ laser stimulation (CO₂ laser SEPs) from a 17-year-old patient affected by myotonic dystrophy whose MRI disclosed a large syrinx extending from spinal level C2 to S3. Careful clinical and electromyographic examinations revealed no motor or sensory disturbances, apart from myotonia. The only abnormality noted in median and ulnar nerve short-latency electric SEPs (recorded with a non-cephalic reference electrode) was the absence of cervical component N13, the other SEP responses (N9, N10, N11, P14, N20) being normal. The cutaneous pain threshold and CO₂ laser SEPs (both obtained by a CO₂ laser beam applied to the back of the hand) were normal. Thus cervical component N13 appears to be highly sensitive to the effects of central cord lesions, even when these are asymptomatic.     

Scalp topography and distribution of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation

Topographies and distributions of cortical SEPs to median nerve stimulation were studied in 8 normal adults and 5 neurological patients. SEPs recorded from C4, P4, Pz, T6-A1A2 derivations to left median nerve stimulation were composed of 2 early negative (N16, N20) and 2 positive components (P12, P23), whereas those recorded from frontal electrodes (Fz, Fp1, Fp2) disclosed 2 early negativities (N16, N24) and 2 early positivities (P12, P20). N20 and P20, and P23 and N24, reversed across the rolandic fissure with no significant difference in their peak latencies. P23 was of slightly shorter latency at C4 than at more posterior electrodes (P4, T6, Pz).In 3 patients with complete hemiplegia but normal sensation, all the early SEP components were normal in scalp distribution and peak latencies except for a decrease of N24 amplitude. In 2 patients with complete hemiplegia and sensory loss no early cortical SEPs were seen. These findings suggest that N20 and P20 are generated as a single horizontal dipole in the central fissure, whereas P23 and N24 are a reflection of multiple generators in pre- and postrolandic regions.     

Primary Sensory and Motor Cortex Excitability Are Co-Modulated in Response to Peripheral Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) is a common clinical technique known to induce changes in corticomotor excitability; PES applied to induce a tetanic motor contraction increases, and PES at sub-motor threshold (sensory) intensities decreases, corticomotor excitability. Understanding of the mechanisms underlying these opposite changes in corticomotor excitability remains elusive. Modulation of primary sensory cortex (S1) excitability could underlie altered corticomotor excitability with PES. Here we examined whether changes in primary sensory (S1) and motor (M1) cortex excitability follow the same time-course when PES is applied using identical stimulus parameters. Corticomotor excitability was measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and sensory cortex excitability using somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) before and after 30 min of PES to right abductor pollicis brevis (APB). Two PES paradigms were tested in separate sessions; PES sufficient to induce a tetanic motor contraction (30–50 Hz; strong motor intensity) and PES at sub motor-threshold intensity (100 Hz). PES applied to induce strong activation of APB increased the size of the N₂₀-P₂₅ component, thought to reflect sensory processing at cortical level, and increased corticomotor excitability. PES at sensory intensity decreased the size of the P25-N33 component and reduced corticomotor excitability. A positive correlation was observed between the changes in amplitude of the cortical SEP components and corticomotor excitability following sensory and motor PES. Sensory PES also increased the sub-cortical P₁₄-N₂₀ SEP component. These findings provide evidence that PES results in co-modulation of S1 and M1 excitability, possibly due to cortico-cortical projections between S1 and M1. This mechanism may underpin changes in corticomotor excitability in response to afferent input generated by PES.     

The usefulness of the spinal and subcortical components of the posterior tibial nerve SEPs for spinal cord monitoring during aortic coarctation repair

This study examines how the recording of the lumbar and subcortical components of the posterior tibial nerve (PTN) SEPs may usefully replace that of cortical components in situations in which these components cannot be reliably obtained (infants, high concentrations of halogenated gasses). Lumbar, brain-stem, and cortical PTN SEPs were intraoperatively monitored in 7 patients undergoing repair of aortic coarctation under variable isoflurane concentration (up to 1.2%). Four patients were less than 1 year old. Two distinct activities were evidenced at the lumbar level in all of the patients: the dorsal root component (DRC) and the dorsal horn negativity (DHN). The equivalent of the adult P30 (lemniscal positivity; LP) was also present in all of the patients, whatever their age or the concentration of isoflurane. By contrast, the parietal activities were absent intraoperatively in the youngest patients. Spinal-cord ischemia consecutive to aortic cross-clamping gave rise to early DHN changes and later alterations of the LP in the two patients in which it occurred, while the DRC and the peripheral nerve activities remained unchanged. This elective sensitivity of the DHN is likely due to it being dependent on the gray matter of the spinal cord, the basal metabolism of which is greater than that of the white matter and to the situation of the DHN generator in a watershed zone of the spinal cord. This study emphasizes the interest of PTN SEPs for spinal-cord monitoring in vascular surgery and the importance of combining the recording of parietal activities with that of the lumbar spinal components.     

Scalp-recorded short and middle latency peroneal somatosensory evoked potentials in normals: comparison with peroneal and median nerve SEPs in patients with unilateral hemispheric lesions

Peroneal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were performed on 23 normal subjects and 9 selected patients with unilateral hemispheric lesions involving somatosensory pathways.Recording obtained from right and left peroneal nerve (PN) stimulations were compared in all subjects, using open and restricted frequency bandpass filters. Restricted filter (100–3000 Hz) and linked ear reference (A1–A2) enhanced the detection of short latency potentials (P1, P2, N1 with mean peak latency of 17.72, 21.07, 24.09) recorded from scalp electrodes over primary sensory cortex regions. Patients with lesions in the parietal cortex and adjacent subcortical areas demonstrated low amplitude and poorly formed short latency peroneal potentials, and absence of components beyond P3 peak with mean latency of 28.06 msec. In these patients, recordings to right and left median nerve (MN) stimulation showed absence or distorted components subsequent to N1 (N18) potential.These observations suggest that components subsequent to P3 potential in response to PN stimulation, and subsequent to N18 potential in response to MN stimulation, are generated in the parietal cortical regions.     

Bit-mapped somatosensory evoked potentials and muscular reflex responses in man: comparative analysis in different experimental protocols

Bit-colour maps of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and muscular responses from forearm and hand muscles were simultaneously recorded after median nerve stimulation. Subjects were asked either to relax totally (A), or to contract the examined muscle continuously and isometrically at 10–20% (B) and 80–100% (C) of the maximal strength. Isotonic contractions ipsilateral (D) and contralateral to the stimulus (E) were also examined. Both SEPs and EMG responses were elicited by individual near-motor threshold pulses delivered at 0.2/sec to the median nerve at the elbow. SEPs were maximal in amplitude during complete relaxation, whilst all the components following the parietal N20 were depressed by muscle contraction. Such decrements affected predominantly the parietal and frontal peaks of positive polarity during condition B, whilst the frontal negative component (wave N30) dropped remarkably in conditions C and D. Early EMG responses (V1 = spinal circuitry) were usually absent in condition A; they were present together with later components (= V2 possibly long-loop, transcortical circuitry) in C and D, whilst they were alone recordable in B and E. The amplitudes of the frontal wave N30 in SEPs and of V2 in LLRs were inversely correlated. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that a change in the reactivity of the sensorimotor brain areas to afferent impulses is coupled to LLR elicitation in forearm and hand muscles.     

The interaction of the somatosensory evoked potentials to simultaneous finger stimuli in the human central nervous system. A study using direct recordings

In order to investigate the interaction of sensory electrophysiologic fields arising from the adjacent second (II) and third (III) fingers and the distant second and fifth (V) fingers, direct recordings of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were performed from the sensory and motor cortices, the sensory thalamic nucleus (nucleus ventralis caudalis, VC) and the cuneate nucleus in humans during neurosurgical operations. Electrical stimulation was given to the II, III or V fingers individually, and also to pairs of either the II and III fingers or the II and V fingers simultaneously. The interaction ratio OR) was devised as the ratio of amplitude attenuation caused by the simultaneous stimulation to two fingers compared with the amplitude of the arithmetically summed SEPs to the individual stimulation of two fingers. The IRs were calculated on N20 and P25 from the sensory cortex, P22 from the motor cortex, P17_thal from the VC, and N16_cune and P35_cune from the cuneate nucleus.With both stimulations to the II and III fingers and the II and V fingers, P25 showed the greatest IR, followed by P22, then by P17_thal while N16_cune exhibited the smallest IR. N20 and P35_cune showed similar IRs and significantly greater IRs with II and III finger stimulation compared with II and V finger stimulation.These results thus indicate that the interaction of somatosensory impulses occurs in several structures along the sensory pathway in CNS, including the cuneate nucleus, the sensory thalamic nucleus, as well as sensory and motor cortices, with the greatest IRs in the cerebral cortices and the weakest ones in the brain-stem. They also suggest that the receptive fields of the fingers in the cortical area generating N20 are arranged according to the order of the fingers while those in the generating sites for cortical P25 and P22, thalamic P17_thal and cuneate N16_cune tend to be arranged in clusters, while P35_cune is possibly modulated by the somatosensory cortex through a long-loop feedback pathway.     

Secretin activates vagal primary afferent neurons in the rat: evidence from electrophysiological and immunohistochemical studies

In this study, we evaluated the vagal afferent response to secretin at physiological concentrations and localized the site of secretin's action on vagal afferent pathways in the rat. The discharge of sensory neurons supplying the gastrointestinal tract was recorded from nodose ganglia. Of 91 neurons activated by electrical vagal stimulation, 19 neurons showed an increase in firing rate in response to intestinal perfusion of 5-HT (from 1.5 +/- 0.2 to 25 +/- 4 impulses/20 s) but no response to intestinal distension. A close intra-arterial injection of secretin (2.5 and 5.0 pmol) elicited responses in 15 of these 19 neurons (from 1.5 +/- 0.2 impulses/20 s at basal to 21 +/- 4 and 43 +/- 5 impulses/20 s, respectively). Subdiaphragmatic vagotomy and perivagal application of capsaicin, but not supranodose vagotomy, completely abolished the secretin-elicited vagal nodose neuronal response. In a separate study, 9 tension receptor afferents among 91 neurons responded positively to intestinal distension but failed to respond to luminal 5-HT. These nine neurons also showed no response to administration of secretin. As expected, immunohistochemical studies showed that secretin administration significantly increased the number of Fos-positive neurons in vagal nodose ganglia. In conclusion, we demonstrated for the first time that vagal sensory neurons are activated by secretin at physiological concentrations. A subpopulation of secretin-sensitive vagal afferent fibers is located in the intestinal mucosa, many of which are responsive to luminal 5-HT.     

Nerve,spinal cord and brain somatosensory evoked responses: a comparative study during electrical and magnetic peripheral nerve stimulation

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and compound nerve action potentials (cNAPs) have been recorded in 15 subjects during electrical and magnetic nerve stimulation. Peripheral records were gathered at Erb's point and on nerve trunks at the elbow during median and ulnar nerve stimulation at the wrist. Erb responses to electrical stimulation were larger in amplitude and shorter in duration than the magnetic ones when ‘electrical’ and ‘magnetic’ compound muscle action potentials (cMAPs) of comparable amplitudes were elicited. SEPs were recorded respectively at Cv7 and on the somatosensory scalp areas contra- and ipsilateral to the stimulated side. SEPs showed a statistically significant difference in amplitude only for the brachial plexus response and for the ‘cortical’ N20-P25 complex; differences were not found between the magnetic and electrical central conduction times (CCTs) or for the peripheral nerve response latencies. Magnetic stimulation preferentially excited the motor and proprioceptive fibres when the nerve trunks were stimulated at motor threshold intensities.     

Giant central N20-P22 with normal area 3b N20-P20: an argument in favour of an area 3a generator of early median nerve cortical SEPs?

Generators of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) still remain to be precisely localised. This gap in knowledge has often resulted in unclear and contrasting SEPs localisation in patients with focal hemispheric lesions. We recorded SEPs to median nerve stimulation in a patient with right frontal astrocytoma, using a 19-channel recording technique. After stimulation of the left median nerve, N20 amplitude was normal when recorded by the parietal electrode contralateral to the stimulation, while it was abnormally enhanced in traces obtained by the contralateral central electrode. The amplitude of the frontal P20 response was within normal limits. This finding suggests that two dipolar sources, tangential and radial to the scalp surface, respectively, contribute concomitantly to N20 generation. The possible location of the N20 radial source in area 3a is discussed. The P22 potential was also recorded with increased amplitude by the central electrode contralateral to the stimulation, while N30 amplitude was normal in frontal and central traces. We propose that the radial dipolar source of P22 response is independent from both N20 and N30 generators and can be located either in 3a or in area 4. This report illustrates the usefulness of multichannel recordings in diagnosing dysfunction of the sensorimotor cortex in focal cortical lesions.     

Dissociation induced by voluntary movement between two different components of the centro-parietal P40 SEP to tibial nerve stimulation

Whether the two earliest cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to tibial nerve stimulation (N37 and P40) are generated by the same dipolar source or, instead, originate from different neuronal populations is still a debated problem. We recorded the early scalp SEPs to tibial nerve stimulation in 10 healthy subjects at rest and during voluntary movement of the stimulated foot. We found that the P40, which reached its highest amplitude on the vertex at rest, changed its topography during movement, since its amplitude was reduced much more in the central than in the parietal traces. These findings suggest that two different components contribute to the centro-parietal positivity at rest: (1) the P37 response, which is parietally distributed and is not modified by movement, and (2) the `real' P40 SEP, which is focused on the vertex and is reduced in amplitude during voluntary movement. Since, also, the N37 response did not vary its amplitude under interference condition, it is possible that the N37 and P37 potentials are generated by the same dipolar source. Other later components, namely P50 and N50, were significantly reduced in amplitude during foot movement. Lastly, the subcortical P30 far-field remained unchanged and this suggests that the phenomenon of amplitude reduction during movement (i.e. gating) occurs above the cervico-medullary junction.     

Origin of frontal N15 component of somatosensory evoked potential in man

Origin of the frontal somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) by median nerve stimulation was investigated in normal volunteers and in patients with localized cerebrovascular diseases, and the following results were obtained.

• 1.(1) In normal subjects, SEPs recorded at F3 (or F4) contralateral to the stimulating median nerve were composed of P12, N15, P18.5 and N26. Similar components were recognized in SEP recorded at Fz.
• 2.(2) In patients in whom putaminal or thalamic hemorrhages had destroyed the posterior limbs of the internal capsules, frontal N15 and parietal N18 (N20) disappeared. These components were also absent in patients with cortical (parietal) infarctions. Among these patients, the thalamus was not affected in cases with putaminal hemorrhages and cortical infarctions.

These facts indicate that the generator of the frontal N15 does not exist in the thalamus but that it originates from the neural structure central to the internal capsule, which suggests a similarity to the generator of the parietal N18.Because N15 was recorded in the midline of the frontal region with shorter latency than parietal N18, the frontal N15 might represent a response to the sensory input of the frontal lobe via the non-specific sensory system.     

Effect of sleep stage on somatosensory evoked potentials by median nerve stimulation

The effects of sleep stage on early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and short-latency components elicited by median nerve stimulation were studied in 12 normal volunteers. The latency of P13 in the awake stage was not significantly different from that in any sleep stage. The latencies of N16, N20 and P20 were significantly prolonged while the amplitude of N20 was decreased during the non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep stage. P22, P23 and N24 components showed double peaks (P23a, P23b, N24a, N24b) during the NREM sleep stage in 6 subjects, while N24 showed a single peak and only P22 and P23 showed double peaks in 5 other subjects. The latencies and morphologies of SEPs during rapid eye movement sleep stage were almost the same as those during the awake stage. These findings suggest that NREM sleep affects the latency, amplitude and morphology of N16 and early cortical components.