Feasibility and potential advantages using VMAT in SRS metastasis treatments

BackgroundUtilization of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) has become the technique of choice as opposed to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). The aim of this work is to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits in terms of normal tissue (NT) and dose escalation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in SRS metastasis treatment. A VMAT optimization procedure has therefore been developed for internal dose scaling which minimizes planner dependence.Materials and methodsFive patient-plans incorporating treatment with frame-based SRS with dynamic conformal arc technique (DA) were re-planned for VMAT. The lesions selected were between 4–6 cm³. The same geometry used in the DA plans was maintained for the VMAT cases. A VMAT planning procedure was performed attempting to scale the dose in inner auxiliary volumes, and to explore the potential for dose scaling with this technique. Comparison of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were obtained.ResultsVMAT allows a superior NT sparing plus conformity and dose scaling using the auxiliary volumes. The VMAT results were significantly superior in NT sparing, improving both the V₁₀ and V₁₂ values in all cases, with a 2–3 cm³ saving. In addition, VMAT improves the dose coverage D₉₅ by about 0.5 Gy. The objective of dose escalation was achieved with VMAT with an increment of the Dmean and the Dmedian of about 2 Gy.ConclusionsThis work shows a benefit of VMAT in SRS treatment with significant NT sparing. A VMAT optimization procedure, based on auxiliary inner volumes, has been developed, enabling internal dose escalation.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with breast cancer brain oligometastases — molecular subtypes and clinical outcomes

BackgroundWe sought to determine the clinical outcomes of patients with breast cancer (BC) who had undergone stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for a limited number of brain metastases (BM) and to identify factors influencing overall survival (OS) and local control.Materials and methodsThe records of 45 patients who underwent SRS for 72 brain lesions were retrospectively evaluated. Statistics included the chi-squared test, Kaplan-Meier method, and the multivariate Cox model.ResultsThe median number of treated BM was 2 (range 1–10). Median OS from BM diagnosis and post-SRS were 27.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.8–40.5) and 18.5 months (95% CI: 11.1–25.8), respectively. One-year and two-year survival rates after BM diagnosis were 55% and 41%, respectively. In a univariate analysis, the Luminal-B-human-epidermal-growth-receptor-positive (HER2+) subtype had the longest median OS at 39.1 months (95% CI: 34.1–44.1, p = 0.004). In an adjusted analysis, grade 2 [hazard ratio (HR): 0.1; 95% CI: 0.1–0.6, p = 0.005), craniotomy (HR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1–0.7; p = 0.006), and ≥ 2 systemic therapies received (HR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1–0.9, p = 0.028) were associated with improved OS. One-year and two-year intracranial progression-free survival rates were 85% and 63%, respectively. Four factors for a higher risk of any intracranial recurrence remained significant in the adjusted analysis, as follows: age < 50 years (HR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.3–36.3; p = 0.014), grade 3 (HR: 3.7; 95% CI: 1.1–13.2; p = 0.038), HER2+ (HR: 6.9; 95% CI: 1.3–36.3; p = 0.023), and whether the brain was the first metastatic site (HR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.6–14.5; p = 0.006).ConclusionIntrinsic BC characteristics are important determinants for both survival and intracranial control for patients undergoing SRS for oligometastatic brain disease.     

Intracranial chordoma: radiosurgery,hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and treatment outcomes

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to assess the results of stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for skull base chordomas.Materials and methodsTwenty-three patients aged 12–75 were treated with SRS/SRT due to skull base chordoma. In 19 patients SRS/SRT was a part of the primary therapy, while in 4, a part of the treatment of recurrence. In 4 patients SRS/SRT was used as a boost after conventional radiotherapy and in 19 cases it was the only irradiation method applied. Patients were irradiated to total dose of 6–35 Gy and median total equivalent dose of 52 Gy.ResultsDuring median follow-up of 39 months, 4 patients died. One-, two- and five-year OS was 95%, 89% and 69%, respectively. In nine patients, progression of the disease was diagnosed during study period. One-, two- and five-year progression free survival (PFS) from the end of radiotherapy was 81%, 59% and 43%, respectively. Radiotherapy was well tolerated and only two patients in our group experienced moderate treatment-related toxicity.ConclusionSRS/SRT alone or in combination with surgery is a safe and effective method of irradiation of patients with skull base chordomas. High EQD₂ is necessary to achieve satisfactory treatment results.     

Dosimetric impact of volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment

BackgroundThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the toxicity and outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated using 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique.Materials and methods68 patients treated between 2006 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Since 2009 patients received 3DCRT with 50/70 Gy to the elective/boost volumes in 35 fractions; from then, VMAT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with 54.45/69.96 Gy in 33, or 54/66 Gy in 30 fractions. Induction chemotherapy was administered in 74% of the patients, concomitant cisplatinum in 87%. Acute and late toxicity data, progression-free survival PSF and overall survival OS, and toxicity correlations with dose metrics were reported.ResultsWith a median follow-up of 64 months, complete remission at the last evaluation was in 68% of the patients, while 28% and 9% had locoregional relapse and distant disease, respectively. The 5- and 10-year progression free survival (PFS) rates were 62.7 ± 6.5% and 53.2 ± 8.7%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 78.9 ± 5.5% and 61.4 ± 9.2%, respectively. At the multivariate Cox analysis TNM stage (p = 0.02) and concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.01) resulted significant for PFS, concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.04) for OS.Improvements in acute toxicity were presented for VMAT patients due to its ability to spare OARs. Odds ratio (OR) for acute salivary toxicity, between VMAT and 3DCRT, was 4.67 (p = 0.02). Dosimetrically, salivary toxicity correlated with mean parotid dose (p = 0.05), dysphagia with laryngeal (p = 0.04) and mean oral cavity (p = 0.06) doses, when dose-volume histograms (DVHs) are corrected for fractionation.ConclusionThis study is a proof of a significant benefit of the VMAT technique compared with 3DCRT in terms of side effects in nasopharynx patients, and adds dosimetric correlations.     

Dose-escalated neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced oesophageal or oesophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with CROSS-protocol is the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate an improvement in complete pathological response (ypCR) after a dose-escalation neoadjuvant protocol compared to standard treatment. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and acute gastrointestinal toxicity.Material and methodsWe prospectively evaluated patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The radiation dose was 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions or 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with weekly administration of six intravenous cycles of carboplatin AUC 2 mg/mL and intravenous paclitaxel 50 mg/m² followed by surgery.ResultsBetween December 2015 and July 2020, 21 patients were treated according to the reported radiation schedules. Median age was 61 years (57–67). 20 (95.2%) tumors were located at the esophagogastric junction and 1 (4.8%) in the middle esophagus. Five (23.8%) were stage II and 16 (76.2%) stage III. Twelve (57.1%) patients received 41.4 Gy (standard group) and 9 (42.9%) received 50.4 Gy (intensification group), with 5 (41.67%) and 5 (55.6%) presenting ypCR in the standard and intensification group, respectively (p = 0.67). After a median follow-up of 17 months (8–30), DFS in the standard group was 17.78 months [95% (CI, confidence interval): 12.9–22.6] and 45.5 months (95% CI: 24.4–66.05) in the intensification group (p = 0.299). Grade III acute gastrointestinal toxicity was 16% and 33.33%, respectively (p = 0.552). Postoperative toxicity events ≥ Grade III were 5 (41.7%) and 4 (44.4%), respectively (p = 0.623).ConclusionsIn our study we found a trend towards a higher complete pathological response-rate and disease-free survival in the intensification group compared to the standard group, with no differences in gastrointestinal toxicity. Well-designed randomized and controlled trials are needed to obtain conclusive data.     

Role of whole brain radiotherapy in the management of infratentorial metastases from lung and breast cancer

BackgroundBrain metastases (BM) occur in almost one third of patients with systemic malignancies. Only a small number of studies focus on infratentorial location and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) as the main non-surgical management. The aim of the study was to compare the prognosis of patients treated with WBRT among patients with supra- or infratentorial lesions.Materials and methodsAt a single center, 263 patients with either breast (BC) or lung (LC) cancer, that had developed BM and received treatment with WBRT, were analyzed during an 8-year period.ResultsA total of 152 patients with BC and 111 with LC were analyzed, median age at the time of BM was 50.7 years, systemic activity other than BM was detected in 91%. Newly diagnosed BM were supratentorial in 40%, infratentorial in 10% and 51% in both locations. Median overall survival was 13 months (95% CI: 11.1–14.8 months), without significant difference between supra- or infratentorial location. WBRT alone was administered in 79% of patients, whereas WBRT with chemtoreapy was provided for 21%.ConclusionIn patients with BM from LC or BC that were not candidates for surgical resection, palliative WBRT appears to be equally effective in those with supra- or infratentorial locations.     

Outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery or whole brain radiation therapy by molecular subtype of metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundThis study quantified clinical outcomes by molecular subtype of metastatic breast cancer (BC) following whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Doing so is important for patient counseling and to assess the potential benefit of combining targeted therapy and brain radiotherapy for certain molecular subtypes in ongoing trials.Materials and methodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for BC (invasive ductal carcinoma) cases receiving brain radiotherapy (divided into WBRT and SRS ). Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors associated with SRS delivery, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling.ResultsOf 1,112 patients, 186 (16.7%) received SRS and 926 (83.3%) underwent WBRT. Altogether, 410 (36.9%), 195 (17.5%), 162 (14.6%), and 345 (31.0%) were ER+/HER2−, ER+/HER2+, ER−/HER2+, and ER−/HER2−, respectively. In the respective molecular subtypes, the proportion of subjects who underwent SRS was 13.4%, 19.4%, 24.1%, and 15.7%. Respective OS for WBRT patients were 12.9, 22.8, 10.6, and 5.8 months; corresponding figures for the SRS cohort were 28.3, 40.7, 15.0, and 12.9 months (p < 0.05 for both). When comparing OS between treatment different histologic subtypes, patients with ER−/HER2+ and ER−/HER2− disease had worse OS than patients with ER+/HER2− disease, for both patients treated with SRS and for patients treated with WBRT.ConclusionsMolecular subtype may be a useful prognostic marker to quantify survival following SRS/WBRT for metastatic BC. Patients with HER 2-enriched and triple-negative disease had the poorest survival following brain irradiation, lending credence to ongoing studies testing the addition of targeted therapies for these subtypes.     

Relations between doses cumulated in bone marrow and dose delivery techniques during radiation therapy of cervical and endometrial cancer

PurposeTo compare normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and average doses in the bone marrow (BM), obtained for five different radiotherapy delivery and planning strategies of cervical and endometrial cancer.Material/methods50 patients were taken to analysis. For each case, 3 different dose delivery techniques were used: 4-field, X15MV, 3DCRT; 7-field, X6MV, IMRT; and 2-arc, X6MV, VMAT. Two optimization scenarios were used for the IMRT and VMAT plans generation: with (+) and without (−) the inclusion of the BM as an optimized structure. Average doses and dose-volume histogram parameters for the PTV, BM, bladder, rectum, bowels and femoral heads were compared. In addition, the BM doses were analyzed with respect to the PTV and/or volume of the BM, and NTCP for the BM were computed.ResultsThe dose in PTV for evaluated plans was similar. The worst doses in organs at risk were obtained for 3DCRT. Using the BM during the optimization of IMRT and VMAT reduces an average dose in BM without increasing the doses in the bladder, rectum and bowels. Differences between doses in BM for IMRT(+) and VMAT(+) plans were similar while NTCP was lower for VMAT(+). A correlation between average dose in BM and the volume ratio of BM and PTV was found for each technique.ConclusionUsing the BM during the optimization of the IMRT and VMAT plans effectively reduces the dose in BM without increasing the dose in the bladder, rectum and bowels. The VMAT(+) plans were characterized by the lowest NTCP.     

Hippocampal dose during Linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: An observational study

IntroductionAim of the present study is to evaluate homolateral and contralateral hippocampus (H-H, C-H, respectively) dose during Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (FSRT) or Radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM).Materials & methodsPatients with BM < 5, size ≤ 30 mm, KPS ≥ 80 and a life expectancy > 3 months, were considered for SRS/FSRT (total dose 15–30 Gy, 1–5 fractions). For each BM, a Flattening Filter Free (FFF) Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plan was generated with one or two arcs. Hippocampi were not considered during optimizations phase and were contoured and evaluated retrospectively in terms of dose: the Dmedian, Dmean, D0.1cc and the V1Gy, V2Gy, V5Gy and V10Gy were analyzed.ResultsFrom April 2014 to December 2015, 81 BM were treated with FFF-FSRT/SRS. For the H-H, the average values of Dmedian, Dmean and D0.1cc were 1.5Gy, 1.54Gy and 2.2Gy, respectively, while the V1Gy, V2Gy, V5Gy and V10Gy values were 25%, 8.9%, 8.9% and 2.1%, respectively. For the C–H, the average Dmedian, Dmean and D0.1 cc were 0.7Gy, 0.7Gy, 0.9Gy, respectively, while the average values of V1Gy, V2Gy, V5Gy and V10Gy were 18%, 10.2%, 2.8% and 1.4%, respectively. Tumor dimension, tumor cranial-caudal length and the distance between BM and H-H were correlated to Dmedian, Dmean and D0.1cc. For C-H, only the distance from PTV was correlated with a dose reduction.ConclusionDuring FFF-FSRT/SRS, hippocampus received a negligible dose. Despite its clinical significance is still under evaluation, in patients with a long life expectancy, H-H should be considered during Linac-based FSRT/SRS.     

Radiation therapy with curative intention in men with de novo metastatic prostate carcinoma: shoot‘em all!

BackgroundAbout 5% of prostate cancer cases are metastatic at diagnoses. Radiotherapy of both primary tumor and secondary lesions can be, in addition to systemic treatments, a radical alternative for selected patients.Materials and methodsPatients with de novo prostate carcinoma with bone or lymph node metastases were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received moderate hypofractionated IMRT/VMAT up to 63 Gy in 21 daily fractions of 3 Gy to prostate and metastases with neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). According to known advances some patients also received abiraterone, enzalutamide, or docetaxel.ResultsBetween 2015–2020, we attended 26 prostate cancer patients (median age 69.5 years, range 52–84) with simultaneous oligometastases [mean 2.1 metastases, median 1.5 metastases (range 1–6)]. Eighteen patients (69%) presented lymph node metastases, 4 (15.5%) bone metastases and 4 (15.5%) both lymph node and bone metastases. With a median follow-up of 15.5 months (range 3–65 months), 16 patients (62%) are alive and tumor free while 10 (38%) are alive with tumor. Four patients (17%) developed tumor progression, out of irradiated area in all cases, with a median time to progression of 43.5 months (range 27–56 months). Actuarial progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 12 and 24 months were 94.1% and 84.7%, respectively. No grade > 2 acute or late complications were recorded.ConclusionsSimultaneous directed radical hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate and metastases is feasible, well tolerated and achieves an acceptable PFS rate. However, further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to definitively address these observations.     

Transitioning from conformal radiotherapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: Clinical benefit,oncologic outcomes and incidence of gastrointestinal and urinary toxicities

AimThe purpose of this study was to review genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity associated with high-dose radiotherapy (RT) delivered with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) following radical prostatectomy (RP).BackgroundRP is a therapeutic option for the management of prostate cancer (PrCa). When assessing postoperative RT techniques for PrCa, the published literature focuses on patients treated with 2-dimensional conventional methods without reflecting the implementation of 3D-CRT, IMRT, or VMAT.Materials and methodsA total of 83 patients were included in this analysis; 30 patients received 3D-CRT, and 53 patients received IMRT/VMAT. Acute and late symptoms of the GU and lower GI tract were retrospectively graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer radiation toxicity grading systems. The relapse failure-free rate and overall survival were also evaluated.ResultsThe rate of acute GU toxicity was 9.4% vs. 13.3% for the IMRT/VMAT and 3D-CRT groups (p = 0.583). The 5-year actuarial rates of late GI toxicity for IMRT/VMAT and 3D-CRT treatments were 1.9% and 6.7%, respectively. The rate of late GU toxicity for the IMRT/VMAT and 3D-CRT treatment groups was 7.5% and 16.6%, respectively (p = 0.199). We found no association between acute or late toxicity and the RT technique in univariate and multivariate analyses.ConclusionPostprostatectomy IMRT/VMAT and 3D-CRT achieved similar morbidity and cancer control outcomes. The clinical benefit of highly conformal techniques in this setting is unclear although formal analysis is needed.     

Repeat single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent vestibular schwannoma

BackgroundData are scarce on the efficacy of a second radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of vestibular schwannoma that has progressed following initial treatment with SRS. We sought to report the outcome of our repeat SRS series with long-term imaging follow-up.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 6 patients who met the following criteria: Repeat SRS at our institution between 1995 and 2018; solitary unilateral tumor; no evidence of neurofibromatosis; and magnetic resonance (MR) planning for both SRS treatments. All treatments were delivered with a linear accelerator-based system using head frame immobilization. The prescribed dose to the periphery of the tumor was 12.5 Gy in all initial and repeat SRS treatments, except for one repeat treatment to 10 Gy.ResultsFollow-up with MR scan following the second SRS treatment was a median 8.4 years. The tumor control rate (lack of progression) following the second SRS treatment was 83% (5/6). Actuarial 10-year outcomes following repeat SRS were: tumor control, 80%; absolute survival, 80%; and cause-specific survival, 100%. Of the patients with at least minimal hearing retention before initial SRS, none had ipsilateral hearing preservation after initial radiation treatment. Improvement in any pretreatment cranial nerve deficits was not seen. The only permanent grade ≥ 3 toxicity from repeat SRS was a case of infraorbital nerve deficit. No patient developed a stroke, malignant transformation, induced second tumor, or facial nerve deficit.ConclusionThere was excellent overall survival, tumor control, and low morbidity in our series for recurrent vestibular schwannoma submitted to repeat single-fraction SRS, supporting additional studies of this treatment strategy.     

Stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases in patients with lung cancer; outcome and toxicity in clinical practice

BackgroundStereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is an established modality for treating limited brain metastases (BMs). This study aimed to assess the real-life treatment outcome and associated prognostic factors for survival in a consecutive lung cancer cohort receiving SRT for BMs.Materials and methodsA retrospective review and analysis of patients with lung cancer with BMs treated with SRT in western Sweden between 2002 and 2017 were performed. Data were collected from patient charts and the radiotherapy dose planning system.ResultsOne hundred nine patients corresponding to 139 lesions were assessed; the majority were treated with single-fractionated SRT with 20 Gy. The median overall survival (OS) was 6.1 months, with a 12-month survival rate of 24%. The estimated overall disease control rate (DCR) was 84% at a median time of three months. On multivariate analysis, WHO performance status (PS) (p = 0.002) and smoking status (p = 0.005) were significant predictive factors for survival. Four percent of the patients experienced possible grade III–IV toxicity, and previously administered cranial radiation therapy was a significant independent factor (p = 0.03) associated with the risk of developing acute toxicity.ConclusionsSRT due to brain metastases from lung cancer is a well-tolerated treatment. When selecting patients suitable for treatment, PS and extracranial disease progression should be considered. Smoking cessation is probably of value even in this palliative setting. The goal of SRT for BMs is not only to improve survival but also to provide symptom relief, and future studies on SRT should assess patient-reported outcomes in addition to survival.     

The Largest Known Survival Analysis of Patients with Brain Metastasis from Thyroid Cancer Based on Prognostic Groups

PurposeTo analyze the clinical features and prognostic factors associated with the survival of patients with a very rare occurrence of brain metastasis (BM) from differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).ResultsThe median age at BM was 63 years, and the median time from initial thyroid cancer diagnosis to BM was 3.8 years. The median survival and the 1-year actuarial survival rate after BM were 8.8 months and 47%, respectively. According to univariate and multivariate analyses, four good prognostic factors (GPFs) were identified including age ≤ 60 years, PS ≤ ECOG 2, ≤ 3 BM sites, and without extracranial metastasis prior to BM. Three prognostic groups were designed based on age and number of remaining GPFs: patients ≤ 60 years of age with at least 2 GPFs (Group A) had the most favorable prognosis with a median survival of 32.8 months; patients ≤ 60 years of age with fewer than 2 GPFs and those > 60 years of age with at least 2 GPFs (Group B) had an intermediate prognosis with a median survival of 9.4 months; and patients > 60 years of age with fewer than 2 GPFs (Group C) had the least favorable prognosis with a median survival of 1.5 months.ConclusionsThe survival of patients with BM form DTC differed among the prognostic groups based on the total number of good prognostic factors.     

Local failure after primary radiotherapy in lung cancer: Is there a role for SBRT?

AimOur purpose is to construe the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of lung cancer from our early experience with SBRT for salvage treatment in patients with recurrent lung cancer after initial radiation therapy.BackgroundLocoregional recurrences are a frequent challenge in patients treated with radio-chemotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC. Conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is rarely given as salvage treatment because of the risk of toxicity. There is a paucity of published studies evaluating the role of SBRT in this clinical setting.Materials and methodsBetween 2008 and present, 10 patients with biopsy proven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) underwent 14 radiosurgical procedures for salvage therapy after failing initial radiation treatment. Patients’ age ranged from 54 to 88 years with a median of 74 years in 6 males and 4 females. Intervals from initial radiation treatment to salvage SBRT were 3–33 months with a median of 13 months. SBRT treatments were delivered using Intensity Modulated Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT). All patients received concomitant chemotherapy.ResultsOverall survival after salvage radiosurgery ranged from 6 to 41 months (mean 20 months, median 18 months). Four of the ten patients are alive with disease locally controlled. Of the remaining 6 patients, 4 had distant progression of disease with brain metastases and one had both brain and lung metastases. The other patient had a regional failure. Toxicities were found in three of the ten (30%) patients with grade I pneumonitis.ConclusionIn our early experience, salvage SBRT is an effective modality of treating patients who failed after conventional irradiation, achieving excellent results in terms of local control with acceptable toxicity. Further prospective studies are needed to determine optimal fractionation schemes.     

Comparative Effectiveness of Hepatic Artery Based Therapies for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundPatients with unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRLM) are increasingly being managed using Hepatic Artery Based Therapies (HAT), including Hepatic Arterial Infusion (HAI), Radioembolization (RE), and Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE). Limited data is available on the comparative effectiveness of these options. We hypothesized that outcomes in terms of survival and toxicity were equivalent across the three strategies.MethodsA meta-analysis was performed using a prospectively registered search strategy at PROSPERO (CRD42013003861) that utilized studies from PubMed (2003–2013). Primary outcome was median overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were treatment toxicity, tumor response, and conversion of the tumor to resectable. Additional covariates included prior or concurrent systemic therapy.ResultsOf 491 studies screened, 90 were selected for analyses—52 (n = 3,000 patients) HAI, 24 (n = 1,268) RE, 14 (n = 1,038) TACE. The median OS (95% CI) for patients receiving HAT in the first-line were RE 29.4 vs. HAI 21.4 vs. TACE 15.2 months (p = 0.97, 0.69 respectively). For patients failing at least one line of prior systemic therapy, the survival outcomes were TACE 21.3 (20.6–22.4) months vs. HAI 13.2 (12.2–14.2) months vs. RE 10.7 (9.5–12.0). Grade 3–4 toxicity for HAT alone was 40% in the HAI group, 19% in the RE group, and 18% in the TACE groups, which was increased with the addition of systemic chemotherapy. Level 1 evidence was available in 5 studies for HAI, 2 studies for RE and 1 for TACE.ConclusionHAI, RE, and TACE are equally effective in patients with unresectable CRLM with marginal differences in survival.     

Survival and prognostic factors for patients with melanoma brain metastases in the era of modern systemic therapy

Historically, the prognosis of patients with melanoma brain metastases is poor, with median overall survival (OS) of 4‐6 months. Little is known of OS in the era of modern systemic therapies and local therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or surgery. Patients diagnosed with melanoma brain metastases at Melanoma Institute Australia from January 2011 to December 2014 were included. OS and prognostic factors were analysed using Cox regression and Kaplan‐Meier survival analyses.355 patients were included. The median OS was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0‐8.1). Median OS differed by treatment modality: systemic therapy and SRS and/or surgery 14.9 months (95% CI 10.7‐19.0), SRS and/or surgery with or without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) 6.4 months (95% CI 5.4‐7.5), systemic therapy 5.4 months (95% CI 3.1‐7.7), systemic therapy and WBRT 5.2 months (95% CI 4.1‐6.4), WBRT 4.4 months (95% CI 2.4‐6.3), and best supportive care 1.8 months (95% CI 1.2‐2.3). OS for patients with melanoma brain metastases appears improved in the modern era, particularly for patients who are candidates for systemic therapy with SRS and/or surgery.     

Differential diagnosis between progression and radionecrosis in brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery using hybrid FDG-PET and MRI coregistered images

IntroductionDual phase 18 FDG brain PET is helpful to assess brain metastases (BM) as tracer will build up in metastases or tumor recurrences while its retention remains stable within normal tissue or inflammatory processes. This is useful when MRI can’t discriminate brain tumor recurrence (TR) rom radionecrosis (RN) after stereotaxic radiosurgery (SRS) for BM. Many studies have sought to improve diagnostic performance by associating FDG-PET and MRI with interesting results but many biases, mostly within image post-processing. Coregistered MRI and dual phase FDG-PET images could alleviate these biases and be used to extract prognostic biomarkers.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients treated with SRS for BM which developed a contrast-enhanced MRI lesion with non-conclusive diagnosis for TR or RN. All patients underwent MRI and FDG-PET at least 3 months after their last SRS session. Dual FDG-PET consisted in an “early” and “delayed” acquisition, respectively 30 minutes and 4 h after injection. MRI included permeability and perfusion sequences. PET and MRI data were all coregistered on the contrast enhanced T1 MRI images. Semi-automated Volumes of Interest (VOI) of the tumor were drawn on the BM and a reference contralateral white-matter ROI (WM) was drawn for standardization; every metric was calculated inside these ROIs, in particular the tumor SUVmax and its variation in time. A 20% increase in the tumor SUVmax was in favor of TR while a modification of less than 100% was in favor of RN. Imaging metrics were then evaluated for their association with TR or RN based on histological, radiological and clinical criteria after at least 6 months follow-up.ResultsNine patients were ruled out as TR and 6 as RN. After standardization, there was a significant difference between groups for VP (P = 0.042), Washin (P = 0.035), Peak Enhancement (P = 0.037), standardized delayed SUVmax (P = 0.008) and RI (P = 0.016). Semi-quantitative analysis found respectively for PET and MRI a Sensitivity of 100% and 87.5% and a Specificity of 100% and 85.71%.ConclusionCoregistered PET-MRI images accurately discriminate between TR and RN. With FDG being the most commonly used PET radiotracer, this protocol remains easily transposable and should be encouraged to obtain non-invasive prognostic and clinically relevant biomarkers.