Electron radiotherapy (IOERT) for applications outside of the breast: Dosimetry and influence of tissue inhomogeneities

PurposeThe purpose of study is to investigate the dosimetry of electron intraoperative radiotherapy (IOERT) of the Intraop Mobetron 2000 mobile LINAC in treatments outside of the breast. After commissioning and external validation of dosimetry, we report in vivo results of measurements for treatments outside the breast in a large patient cohort, and investigate if the presence of inhomogeneities can affect in vivo measurements.Methods and materialsApplicator factors and profile curves were measured with a stereotactic diode. The applicators factors of the 6 cm flat and beveled applicators were also confirmed with radiochromic films, parallel-plate ion chamber and by an external audit performed with ThermoLuminescent Dosimeters (TLDs). The influence of bone on dose was investigated by using radiochromic films attached to an insert equivalent to cortical bone, immersed in the water phantom. In vivo dosimetry was performed on 126 patients treated with IOERT using metal oxide-silicon semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) placed on the tumor bed.ResultsRelatively small differences were found among different detectors for measurements of applicator factors. In the external audit, the agreement with the TLD was mostly within ±0.2%. The largest increase of dose due to the presence of cortical bone insert was +6.0% with energy 12 MeV and 3 cm applicator. On average, in vivo dose was significantly (+3.1%) larger than prescribed dose.ConclusionIOERT in applications outside the breast results in low discrepancies between in vivo and prescribed doses, which can be also explained with the presence of tissue inhomogeneity.     

Effects of shielding on pelvic and abdominal IORT dose distributions

PurposeTo study the impact of shielding elements in the proximity of Intra-Operative Radiation Therapy (IORT) irradiation fields, and to generate graphical and quantitative information to assist radiation oncologists in the design of optimal shielding during pelvic and abdominal IORT.MethodAn IORT system was modeled with BEAMnrc and EGS++ Monte Carlo codes. The model was validated in reference conditions by gamma index analysis against an experimental data set of different beam energies, applicator diameters, and bevel angles. The reliability of the IORT model was further tested considering shielding layers inserted in the radiation beam. Further simulations were performed introducing a bone-like layer embedded in the water phantom. The dose distributions were calculated as 3D dose maps.ResultsThe analysis of the resulting 2D dose maps parallel to the clinical axis shows that the bevel angle of the applicator and its position relative to the shielding have a major influence on the dose distribution. When insufficient shielding is used, a hotspot nearby the shield appears near the surface. At greater depths, lateral scatter limits the dose reduction attainable with shielding, although the presence of bone-like structures in the phantom reduces the impact of this effect.ConclusionsDose distributions in shielded IORT procedures are affected by distinct contributions when considering the regions near the shielding and deeper in tissue: insufficient shielding may lead to residual dose and hotspots, and the scattering effects may enlarge the beam in depth. These effects must be carefully considered when planning an IORT treatment with shielding.     

Thermoluminescence dosimetry of the dose received by scrotum and testes in radiotherapy of rectal cancer,compared to the point doses calculated by 3D-planning software

PurposeRadiation received by the testes in the course of radiotherapy for rectal cancer may cause oligospermia and azospermia. We sought to determine the dose to the scrotum and testes with thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD), and compare it to the dose calculated by 3D planning software.MethodsThe TLDs were fixed to the scrotum in six points anteriorly and posteriorly in two fractions of radiotherapy. All patients received a 50–50.4 Gy total dose in prone position with 3D-planning. The average dose of TLD measurements was compared to the average of 6 relevant point doses calculated by the planning software.ResultsThe mean scrotal dose of radiation in 33 patients as measured by TLD was 3.77 Gy (7.5% of the total prescribed dose), and the mean of point doses calculated by the planning software was 4.11 Gy (8.1% of the total dose), with no significant difference. A significant relationship was seen between the position of the inferior edge of the fields and the mean scrotal dose (P = .04). Also body mass index (BMI) was inversely related with the scrotal dose (P = .049).ConclusionWe found a dose of about 4 Gy received by the scrotum and testes from a total prescribed dose of 50 Gy in the radiotherapy of rectal carcinoma patients, with TLD measurements confirming testicular dose estimations by the planning software. This dose could be significantly harmful for spermatogenesis. Thus careful attention to the testicular dose in radiotherapy of rectal cancer for men desiring continued fertility is a necessity.     

Absolute dose verification of static intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with ion chambers of various volumes and TLD detectors

Aim

This study aims at examining absolute dose verification of step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation treatment (IMRT) of prostate and brain patients by use of ion chambers of two different volumes and thermoluminescent detectors (TLD).

Radiation dose verification of an X-ray based blood irradiator using EBT3 radiochromic films calibrated using Gamma Knife machine

AimBlood irradiators (BI) initial acceptance testing and routine annual dosimetry checks require radiation dose measurements in order to comply with regulatory requirements.BackgroundTraditionally thermo-luminescence dosimeters (TLD) have been used to measure the dose. The EBT3 film is reported to be a better dosimeter for low energy X-rays than its predecessors EBT2 and EBT. To the best of our knowledge, the use of EBT3 films to perform dosimetry on X-ray based BI has not been reported yet.Materials and methodsWe performed routine radiation dosimetry checks using EBT3 films on a new X-ray based BI and compared the results with TLD dosimetry. Calibration films were irradiated with radiation beam from a Co-60 Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery machine and, alternatively, using an Ir-192 high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy device. The films were calibrated to cover a wide dose range from 1 to 40 Gy. Such a wide dose range has not been reported yet in BI film dosimetry.ResultsWe obtained a relative difference of about 6.6% between doses measured using TLD and those measured using EBT3 films. Both irradiation methods using GK or HDR were found to be adequate for the calibration of the EBT3 Gafchromic films.ConclusionsWe recommend the use of EBT3 films in routine X-ray based BI dosimetry checks. The presented method takes advantage of available radiotherapy equipment that can be efficiently used for EBT3 films calibration. The method is fast, reproducible and saves valuable medical physicist's time.     

In vivo dosimetry with MOSFETs and GAFCHROMIC films during electron IORT for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the delivered dose to the expected intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) dose with in vivo dosimetry. For IORT using electrons in accelerated partial breast irradiation, this is especially relevant since a high dose is delivered in a single fraction.MethodsFor 47 of breast cancer patients, in vivo dosimetry was performed with MOSFETs and/or GAFCHROMIC EBT2 films. A total dose of 23.33 Gy at d_max was given directly after completing the lumpectomy procedure with electron beams generated with an IORT dedicated mobile accelerator. A protection disk was used to shield the thoracic wall.ResultsThe results of in vivo MOSFET dosimetry for 27 patients and GAFROMIC film dosimetry for 20 patients were analysed. The entry dose for the breast tissue, measured with MOSFETs, (mean value 22.3 Gy, SD 3.4%) agreed within 1.7% with the expected dose (mean value 21.9 Gy). The dose in breast tissue, measured with GAFCHROMIC films (mean value 23.50 Gy) was on average within 0.7% (SD = 3.7%, range −5.5% to 5.6%) of the prescribed dose of 23.33 Gy.ConclusionsThe dose measured with MOSFETs and GAFROMIC EBT2 films agreed well with the expected dose. For both methods, the dose to the thoracic wall, lungs and heart for left sided patents was lower than 2.5 Gy even when 12 MeV was applied. The positioning time of GAFCHROMIC films is negligible and based on our results we recommend its use as a standard tool for patient quality assurance during breast cancer IORT.     

End-to-end dosimetric audit: A novel procedure developed for Irish HDR brachytherapy centres

PurposeA dosimetric audit of Ir-192 high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy remote after-loading units was carried out in 2019. All six brachytherapy departments on the island of Ireland participated in an end-to-end test and in a review of local HDR dosimetry procedures.Materials and methodsA 3D-printed customised phantom was created to position the following detectors at known distances from the HDR source: a Farmer ionization chamber, GafChromic film and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Dedicated HDR applicator needles were used to position an Ir-192 source at 2 cm distance from these detectors. The end-to-end dosimetry audit pathway was performed at each host site and included the stages of imaging, applicator reconstruction, treatment planning and delivery. Deviations between planned and measured dose distributions were quantified using gamma analysis methods. Local procedures were also discussed between auditors and hosts.ResultsThe mean difference between Reference Air Kerma Rate (RAKR) measured during the audit and RAKR specified by the vendor source certificate was 1.3%. The results of end-to-end tests showed a mean difference between calculated and measured dose of 2.5% with TLDs and less than 0.5% with Farmer chamber measurements. GafChromic films showed a mean gamma passing rates of >95% for plastic and metal applicators with 2%/1 mm global tolerance criteria.ConclusionsThe results of this audit indicate dosimetric consistency between centres. The ‘end to end’ dosimetry audit methodology for HDR brachytherapy has been successfully implemented in a multicentre environment, which included different models of Ir-192 sources and different treatment planning systems.The ability to create a 3D-printed water-equivalent phantom customised to accurately position all three detector types simultaneously at controlled distances from the Ir-192 source under evaluation gives good reproducibility for end-to-end methodology.     

Application of Gafchromic EBT2 film for intraoperative radiation therapy quality assurance

PurposeIntraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) using electron beam is commonly done by mobile dedicated linacs that have a variable range of electron energies. This paper focuses on the evaluation of the EBT2 film response in the green and red colour channels for IORT quality assurance (QA).MethodsThe calibration of the EBT2 films was done in two ranges; 0–8 Gy for machine QA by red channel and 8–24 Gy for patient-specific QA by green channel analysis. Irradiation of calibration films and relative dosimetries were performed in a water phantom. To evaluate the accuracy of the film response in relative dosimetry, gamma analysis was used to compare the results of the Monte Carlo simulation and ionometric dosimetry. Ten patients with early stage breast cancer were selected for in-vivo dosimetry using the green channel of the EBT2 film.ResultsThe calibration curves were obtained by linear fitting of the green channel and a third-order polynomial function in the red channel (R2 = 0.99). The total dose uncertainty was up to 4.2% and 4.7% for the red and green channels, respectively. There was a good agreement between the relative dosimetries of films by the red channel, Monte Carlo simulations and ionometric values. The mean dose difference of the in-vivo dosimetry by green channel of this film and the expected values was about 1.98% ± 0.75.ConclusionThe results of this study showed that EBT2 film can be considered as an appropriate tool for machine and patient-specific QA in IORT.     

Assessment of clinically relevant dose distributions in pelvic IOERT using Gafchromic EBT3 films

PurposeIn IOERT a single dose of radiation is delivered to the tumour site during surgery. Manual dose calculations are used and the irradiation target volume, electron energy and applicator are decided on site by the radiation oncologist. This work assesses the effect that irregular and curved surfaces, typical of pelvic IOERT, may have on the expected dose distribution.MethodsThe feasibility of using Gafchromic EBT3 films and a slab phantom to obtain 2D dose distributions was investigated. Different set-ups were tested by comparison with water tank measurements, applying the gamma function analysis with 2% and 2 mm criteria. The validated set-up was then used to obtain reference dose distributions, which were converted to colour-coded graphical representations. Phantoms with step-like and curved surfaces were created to simulate typical pelvic IOERT irradiation surfaces, and the dose distributions were obtained and compared with the reference distributions.ResultsGood agreement with water tank measurements was obtained for all applicators below 2 mm, using the chosen setup in reference conditions. In non-reference conditions, the presence of a step-like surface creates an adjacent hotspot, followed by a quick reduction of the dose in depth. With curved surfaces, the dose distribution is shifted forward, becoming curved and deeper, but when the applicator is larger than the hole, hotspots are also observed.ConclusionsThe shape of the irradiation surfaces alters the dose distribution. Visualization of these effects is important to assess target coverage and interpret in vivo measurements in pelvic IOERT.     

Precision IORT – Image guided intraoperative radiation therapy (igIORT) using online treatment planning including tissue heterogeneity correction

BackgroundTo the present date, IORT has been eye and hand guided without treatment planning and tissue heterogeneity correction. This limits the precision of the application and the precise documentation of the location and the deposited dose in the tissue. Here we present a set-up where we use image guidance by intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for precise online Monte Carlo treatment planning including tissue heterogeneity correction.Materials and methodsAn IORT was performed during balloon kyphoplasty using a dedicated Needle Applicator. An intraoperative CBCT was registered with a pre-op CT. Treatment planning was performed in Radiance using a hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm simulating dose in homogeneous (MCwater) and heterogeneous medium (MChet). Dose distributions on CBCT and pre-op CT were compared with each other. Spinal cord and the metastasis doses were evaluated.ResultsThe MCwater calculations showed a spherical dose distribution as expected. The minimum target dose for the MChet simulations on pre-op CT was increased by 40% while the maximum spinal cord dose was decreased by 35%. Due to the artefacts on the CBCT the comparison between MChet simulations on CBCT and pre-op CT showed differences up to 50% in dose.ConclusionsigIORT and online treatment planning improves the accuracy of IORT. However, the current set-up is limited by CT artefacts. Fusing an intraoperative CBCT with a pre-op CT allows the combination of an accurate dose calculation with the knowledge of the correct source/applicator position. This method can be also used for pre-operative treatment planning followed by image guided surgery.     

Occupational radiation dose of personnel involved in sentinel node biopsy procedure

IntroductionSentinel node biopsy is a procedure used for axillary nodal staging in breast cancer surgery. The process uses radioactive ^99mTc isotope for mapping the sentinel node(s) and all the staff involved in the procedure is potentially exposed to ionizing radiation. The colloid for radiolabelling (antimone-sulphide) with ^99mTc isotope (half-life 6 h) is injected into the patient breast. The injection has activity of 18.5 MBq. The surgeon removes the primary tumor and detects active lymph nodes with gamma detection unit. The tumor as well as the active nodal tissue is transferred to pathologist for the definitive findings. The aim of the study was to measure dose equivalents to extremities and whole body for all staff and suggest practice improvement in order to minimize exposure risk.Materials and methodsThe measurements of the following operational quantities were performed: Hp(10) personal dose equivalent to whole body and Hp(0.07) to extremities for staff as well as ambiental dose for operating theatre and during injection.Hp(0.07) were measured at surgeon’s finger by ring thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) type MTS-N, and reader RADOS RE2000. Surgeon and nurse were wearing TLD personal dosimeter at the chest level. Anesthesiologist and anesthetist were wearing electronic personal dosimeters, while pathologist was wearing ring TLD while manipulating tissue samples.Electronic dosimeters used were manufactured by Polimaster, type PM1610.All TLD and electronic dosimeters data were reported, including background radiation. Background radiation was also monitored separately. Personal TLDs are standard for this type of personal monitoring, provided by accredited laboratory.Measurements of ambiental dose in workplaces of other staff involved around the patient was performed before the surgery took place, by calibrated survey meters manufactured by Atomtex, type 1667.The study involved two surgeons and one pathologist, two anesthesiologists and three anesthetists during two months period.Results and discussionThe doses received by all staff are evaluated using passive and active personal dosimeters and ambiental dose monitors and practice was improved based on results collected. Average annual whole body dose for all staff involved in the procedure was less than 0.8 mSv. Extremity dose equivalents to surgeon and pathologist were far below the limits set for professionally exposed (surgeon) and for public (pathologist).ConclusionsAlthough has proven to be very safe for all staff, additional measures for radiation protection, in accordance to ALARA principle (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) should be conducted. The recommendations for practice improvement with respect to radiation protection were issued.     

Phantom development for daily checks in electron intraoperative radiotherapy with a mobile linac

PurposeIORT with mobile linear accelerators is a well-established modality where the dose rate and, therefore, the dose per pulse are very high. The constancy of the dosimetric parameters of the accelerator has to be checked daily. The aim of this work is to develop a phantom with embedded detectors to improve both accuracy and efficiency in the daily test of an IORT linac at the surgery room.MethodsThe developed phantom is manufactured with transparent polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), allocating 6 parallel-plate chambers: a central one to evaluate the on-axis beam output, another on-axis one placed at a fixed depth under the previous one to evaluate the energy constancy and four off-axis chambers to evaluate the flatness and symmetry. To analyse the readings a specific application has been developed.ResultsFor all chambers and energies, the mean saturation and polarization corrections were smaller than 0.7%. The beam is monitored at different levels of the clinical beam. Output, energy constancy and flatness correlate very well with the correspondent values with the complete applicator. During the first six months of clinical use the beam dosimetric parameters showed excellent stability.ConclusionsA phantom has been developed with embedded parallel plate chambers attached to the upper applicator part of an IORT linac. The phantom allows a very efficient setup reducing the time to check the parameters. It provides complete dosimetric information (output, energy and flatness) with just one shot and using ionization chambers with minimum saturation effect, as this highly pulsed beam requires.     

Impact of spherical applicator diameter on relative biologic effectiveness of low energy IORT X-rays: A hybrid Monte Carlo study

IntroductionLow-kV IORT (Low kilovoltage intraoperative radiotherapy) using INTRABEAM machine and dedicated spherical applicators is a candidate modality for breast cancer treatment. The current study aims to quantify the RBE (relative biologic effectiveness) variations of emitted X-rays from the surface of different spherical applicators and bare probe through a hybrid Monte Carlo (MC) simulation approach.Materials and methodsA validated MC model of INTRABEAM machine and different applicator diameters, based on GEANT4 Toolkit, was employed for RBE evaluation. To doing so, scored X-ray energy spectra at the surface of each applicator diameter/bare probe were used to calculate the corresponding secondary electron energy spectra at various distances inside the water and breast tissue. Then, MCDS (Monte Carlo damage simulation) code was used to calculate the RBE values according to the calculated electron spectra.ResultsPresence of spherical applicators can increase the RBE of emitted X-rays from the bare probe by about 22.3%. In return, changing the applicator diameter has a minimal impact (about 3.2%) on RBE variation of emitted X-rays from each applicator surface. By increasing the distance from applicator surface, the RBE increments too, so that its value enhances by about 10% with moving from 2 to 10 mm distance. Calculated RBE values within the breast tissue were higher than those of water by about 4% maximum value.ConclusionBall section of spherical IORT applicators can affect the RBE value of the emitted X-rays from INTRABEAM machine. Increased RBE of breast tissue can reduce the prescribed dose for breast irradiation if INTRABEAM machine has been calibrated inside the water.     

Energy and dose dependence of GafChromic EBT3-V3 film across a wide energy range

AimTo determine the energy and dose dependence of GafChromic EBT3-V3 film over an energy range 0.2 mm Al HVL to 6 MV.BackgroundThe decay scheme of a brachytherapy source may be complex and the spectrum of energy can be wide. LiF TLDs are the golden standard recommended for dosimetric measures in brachytherapy, for their energy independence, but TLDs could be not available in some centres. An alternative way to perform dose measurements is to use GafChromic films, but they show energy dependence.Methods and materialsFilms have been irradiated at increasing dose with three different beams: 6 MV beam, TPR20, 10 = (0.684 ± 0.01), HVL = (2.00 ± 0.01)mmAl and HVL = (0.20 ± 0.01)mmAl. Calibration curves were generated using the same dose range (0cGy to 850cGy) for the three energies. Using the 6 MV calibration curve as reference, the film response in terms of net optical density (OD) was evaluated.ResultsThe difference in the calibration curve obtained by irradiating the film with 6 MV and 2 mm Al HVL energy beams is less than 3 %, within the calibration uncertainty, in the dose range 500-850cGy. The OD of EBT3-V3 film is significantly lower at 0.2 mmAl HVL compared to 6 MV, showing differences up to 25 %.ConclusionWithin the range 6 MV-2 mm Al HVL and dose higher than 500cGy, GafChromic EBT3-V3 films are energy independent. In this dose range, films can be calibrated in a simple geometry, using a 6 MV Linac beam, and can be used for brachytherapy sources dose measures. The use of EBT3 films can be extended to reference dosimetry in Ir-192 clinical brachytherapy.     

Influence of different Fletcher–Suit applicator geometries on sagittal dose distribution

IntroductionOne of the brachytherapy treatment modality of cervix carcinomas is insertion with Fletcher–Suit (FS) applicator. Depending on the patient anatomy and pathology and on the construction of the FS applicator different geometrical arrangements in ovoid separation, in ovoids' sagittal level with respect to the tandem were experienced. The multiple insertions show minor differences in applicator geometries. The aim of the study is to evaluate the influence of main geometrical parameters: the ovoid separation, symmetry and the ovoids' sagittal shift on dose distribution in different FS applicator arrangements. We tested the effect of dwell time settings in improvement of dose distribution of less adequate insertions. We also investigated the effect of inter-fractional variation of applicator geometry.Materials and methodsWe considered 73 treatment fractions of 22 patients. All insertions were performed by the same gynaecologist with the same type of FS applicator, while the treatment plans were generated by the same physicist using the same treatment planning method. We compared the sagittal dose distribution of different FS applicator geometries with dose levels at two applicator points, defined 2 cm apart from the tandem towards the bladder and rectum. We computed the Pearson correlation coefficients between the dose levels at the applicator points and the ovoid separation, symmetry and the ovoids' sagittal shift. We also investigated the effect of dwell time settings in ovoids in order to decrease the dose to organs at risk. The inter-fractional variation of the FS applicator geometries and the influence on the dose levels at the two applicator points were also tested.Results and conclusionsStrong correlation was found between the ovoid separation and dose values to applicator points defined in sagittal direction of FS applicator arrangements. Also strong correlation was between the ovoids' sagittal position with respect to the tandem and the applicator point defined towards the rectum, while the ovoid symmetry had no influence on the sagittal dose distribution. The standard deviations of inter-fractional variation of the ovoid separation and the ovoids' sagittal position were within ±5.2 mm and ±10.2 mm respectively. The inter-fractional variations in FS applicator geometry resulted in variation in dose levels at the applicator points ±0.8 Gy typically, while the largest value was ±1.6 Gy.     

Calculation and measurement of doses in the surface layers of a phantom when using Tomotherapy

BackgroundThe calculation and measurement on the surface of the skin presents a significant dosimetric problem because of numerous factors which have an influence on the dose distribution in this region.AimThe overall aim of this study was to check the agreement between doses measured with thermoluminescent detectors (TLD) during tomotherapy photon beam irradiation of the skin area of a solid water cylindrical phantom with doses calculated with Hi-Art treatment planning system (TPS).Material and MethodThe measurements of the dose were made with the use of a solid water cylindrical phantom - Cheese Phantom. Two bolus phantoms were used: 5 mm and 10 mm Six different planning treatments were generated. The doses were measured using TL detectors.ResultsIn the case of a tumor located near the surface of the skin, the mean dose for 0.5 cm bolus was - 1.94 Gy, and for 1 cm bolus - 2.03 Gy. For the tumor located inside the phantom and organ at risk on the same side that TL detectors, for a 0.5 cm bolus, mean dose was 0.658 Gy, and for a 1 cm bolus, 0.62 Gy.ConclusionThe analysis of results showed that the relative percentage difference between measured and planned dose in the field of irradiation was less than 10%, while the largest differences were on the board of the field of radiation and outside of the field of irradiation, where the dose was 0.08 Gy to 1 Gy.     

Evaluation of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) for Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance

Background

Purpose of the present work was to investigate thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) response to intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) beams. In an IOERT treatment, a large single radiation dose is delivered with a high dose-per-pulse electron beam (2–12 cGy/pulse) during surgery. To verify and to record the delivered dose, in vivo dosimetry is a mandatory procedure for quality assurance. The TLDs feature many advantages such as a small detector size and close tissue equivalence that make them attractive for IOERT as in vivo dosimeters.

Methods

LiF:Mg,Ti dosimeters (TLD-100) were irradiated with different IOERT electron beam energies (5, 7 and 9 MeV) and with a 6 MV conventional photon beam. For each energy, the TLDs were irradiated in the dose range of 0–10 Gy in step of 2Gy. Regression analysis was performed to establish the response variation of thermoluminescent signals with dose and energy.

Results

The TLD-100 dose-response curves were obtained. In the dose range of 0–10 Gy, the calibration curve was confirmed to be linear for the conventional photon beam. In the same dose region, the quadratic model performs better than the linear model when high dose-per-pulse electron beams were used (F test; p<0.05).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the TLD dose response, for doses ≤10Gy, has a parabolic behavior in high dose-per-pulse electron beams. TLD-100 can be useful detectors for IOERT patient dosimetry if a proper calibration is provided.     

Characterization of a microDiamond detector in high-dose-per-pulse electron beams for intra operative radiation therapy

PurposeTo characterize a synthetic diamond dosimeter (PTW Freiburg microDiamond 60019) in high dose-per-pulse electron beams produced by an Intra Operative Radiation Therapy (IORT) dedicated accelerator.MethodsThe dosimetric properties of the microDiamond were assessed under 6, 8 and 9 MeV electron beams by a NOVAC11 mobile accelerator (Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A.).The characterization was carried out with dose-per-pulse ranging from 26 to 105 mGy per pulse. The microDiamond performance was compared with an Advanced Markus ionization chamber and a PTW silicon diode E in terms of dose linearity, percentage depth dose (PDD) curves, beam profiles and output factors.ResultsA good linearity of the microDiamond response was verified in the dose range from 0.2 Gy to 28 Gy. A sensitivity of 1.29 nC/Gy was measured under IORT electron beams, resulting within 1% with respect to the one obtained in reference condition under ⁶⁰Co gamma irradiation. PDD measurements were found in agreement with the ones by the reference dosimeters, with differences in R₅₀ values below 0.3 mm. Profile measurements evidenced a high spatial resolution of the microDiamond, slightly worse than the one of the silicon diode. The penumbra widths measured by the microDiamond resulted approximately 0.5 mm larger than the ones by the Silicon diode. Output factors measured by the microDiamond were found within 2% with those obtained by the Advanced Markus down to 3 cm diameter field sizes.ConclusionsThe microDiamond dosimeter was demonstrated to be suitable for precise dosimetry in IORT applications under high dose-per-pulse conditions.     

Verification in the water phantom of the irradiation time calculation done by the algorithm used in intraoperative radiotherapy

AimThe investigation of the irradiation time calculation accuracy of the GGPB algorithm used for IORT.BackgroundConventionally, breast conserving therapy consists of breast conserving surgery followed by postoperative whole breast irradiation and boost. The use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) enables the boost to be delivered already during the surgery. In this case, the treatment dose for IORT can be calculated by use of General Gaussian Pencil Beam (GGPB) algorithm, which is implemented in TPS Eclipse.Materials and methodsPDDs and OFs for electron beams from Mobetron and all available applicators were measured in order to configure the GGPB algorithm. Afterwards, the irradiation times for the prescribed dose of 3 Gy were calculated by means of it. The results of calculations were verified in the water phantom using the Marcus ionization chamber.ResultsThe results differed between energies. For 6 MeV the irradiation times calculated by the GGPB algorithm were correct, for the energy of 9 MeV they were too small and for the energy of 4 MeV they were too large for applicators with smaller diameters, while acceptable for the remaining ones.ConclusionThe GGPB algorithm can be used in intraoperative radiotherapy for energy and applicator sets for which no significant difference between the measured and the prescribed dose was obtained. For the rest of energy-applicator sets the configuration should be verified and possibly repeated.