Right or left ear reference changes the voltage of frontal and parietal somatosensory evoked potentials

Short-latency cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to left median nerve stimulation were recorded with either the left or right earlobe as reference. With a right earlobe reference the voltage of the parietal N20 and P27 was reduced while the voltage of the frontal P20 and N30 was enhanced. The effects were consistent, but their size varied with the SEP component considered and also among the subjects. Analysis of SEPs at different scalp sites and at either earlobe suggested that the ear contralateral to the side stimulated picked up transient potential differences, depending a.o. on side asymmetry and geometry of the neural generators as disclosed in topographic mapping. For example, the right ear potential can be shifted negatively by the right N20 field evoked by left median nerve stimulation. The changes involve the absolute potential values, but not the time features of the gradients of potential fields. Scalp current density (SCD) maps are not affected. The results are pertinent for current discussions about which reference to use and document the practical recommendation of recording short-latency cortical SEPs with a reference at the ear ipsilateral (not contralateral) to the side of stimulation.     

Pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials following CO2 laser stimulation of foot in man

Since our previous study of pain somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) following CO₂ laser stimulation of the hand dorsum could not clarify whether the early cortical component NI was generated from the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) or the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) or both, the scalp topography of SEPs following CO₂ laser stimulation of the foot dorsum was studied in 10 normal subjects and was compared with that of the hand pain SEPs and the conventional SEPs following electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve recorded in 8 and 6 of the 10 subjects, respectively. Three components (N1, N2 and P2) were recorded for both foot and hand pain SEPs. N1 of the foot pain SEPs was maximal at the midline electrodes (Cz or CPz) in all data where that potential was recognized, but the potential field distribution was variable among subjects and even between two sides within the same subject. N1 of the hand pain SEPs was maximal at the contralateral central or midtemporal electrode. The scalp distribution of N2 and P2, however, was not different between the foot and hand pain SEPs. The mean peak latency of N1 following stimulation of foot and hand was found to be 191 msec and 150 msec, respectively, but there was no significant difference in the interpeak latency of Nl-N2 between foot and hand stimulation. It is therefore concluded that NI of the foot pain SEPs is generated mainly from the foot area of SI. The variable scalp distribution of the N7 component of the foot pain SEPs is likely due to an anatomical variability among subjects and even between sides.     

Bit-mapped somatosensory evoked potentials and muscular reflex responses in man: comparative analysis in different experimental protocols

Bit-colour maps of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and muscular responses from forearm and hand muscles were simultaneously recorded after median nerve stimulation. Subjects were asked either to relax totally (A), or to contract the examined muscle continuously and isometrically at 10–20% (B) and 80–100% (C) of the maximal strength. Isotonic contractions ipsilateral (D) and contralateral to the stimulus (E) were also examined. Both SEPs and EMG responses were elicited by individual near-motor threshold pulses delivered at 0.2/sec to the median nerve at the elbow. SEPs were maximal in amplitude during complete relaxation, whilst all the components following the parietal N20 were depressed by muscle contraction. Such decrements affected predominantly the parietal and frontal peaks of positive polarity during condition B, whilst the frontal negative component (wave N30) dropped remarkably in conditions C and D. Early EMG responses (V1 = spinal circuitry) were usually absent in condition A; they were present together with later components (= V2 possibly long-loop, transcortical circuitry) in C and D, whilst they were alone recordable in B and E. The amplitudes of the frontal wave N30 in SEPs and of V2 in LLRs were inversely correlated. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that a change in the reactivity of the sensorimotor brain areas to afferent impulses is coupled to LLR elicitation in forearm and hand muscles.     

Topography of somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation in patients with cerebral lesions

Scalp distributions and topographies of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation were studied in 22 patients with 5 different types of cerebral lesion due to cerebrovascular disease or tumor (thalamic, postcentral subcortical, precentral subcortical, diffuse subcortical and parieto-occipital lesions) in order to investigate the origins of frontal (P20, N24) and central-parietal SEPs (N20, P22, P23).In 2 patients with thalamic syndrome, N16 was delayed in latency and N20/P20 were not recorded. No early SEP except for N16 was recorded in 2 patients with pure hemisensory loss due to postcentral subcortical lesion. In all 11 patients with pure hemiparesis or hemiplegia due to precentral subcortical lesion N20/P20 and P22, P23/N24 components were of normal peak latencies. The amplitude of N24 was significantly decreased in all 3 patients with complete hemiplegia. These findings support the hypothesis that N20/P20 are generated as a horizontal dipole in the central sulcus (3b), whereas P23/N24 are a reflection of multiple generators in pre- and post-rolandic fissures. P22 was very localized in the central area contralateral to the stimulation.Topographical studies of early cortical SEPs are useful for detecting each component in abnormal SEPs     

Direct recording of somatosensory evoked potentials in the vicinity of the dorsal column nuclei in man: their generator mechanisms and contribution to the scalp far-field potentials

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in the vicinity of the dorsal column nuclei in response to electrical stimulation of the median nerve (MN) and posterior tibial nerve (PTN) were studied by analyzing the wave forms, topographical distribution, effects of higher rates of stimulation and correlation with components of the scalp-recorded SEPs. Recordings were done on 4 patients with spasmodic torticollis during neurosurgical operations for microvascular decompression of the eleventh nerve. The dorsal column SEPs to MN stimulation (MN-SEPs) were characterized by a major negative wave (N1; 13 msec in mean latency), preceded by a small positivity (P1) and followed by a large positive wave (P2). Similar wave forms (P1′-N1′-P2′) were obtained with stimulation of PTN (PTN-SEPs), with a mean latency of N1′ being 28 msec. Maximal potentials of MN-SEPs and PTN-SEPs were located in the vicinity of the ipsilateral cuneate and gracile nuclei, respectively, at a level slightly caudal to the nuclei. The latencies of P1 and N1 increased progressively at more rostral cervical cord segments and medulla, but that of P2 did not. A higher rate of stimulation (16 Hz) caused no effects on P1 and N1, while it markedly attenuated the P2 component. These findings suggest that P1 and N1 of MN-SEPs, as well as P1′ and N1′ of PTN-SEPs, are generated by the dorsal column fibers, and P2 and P2′ are possibly of postsynaptic origin in the respective dorsal column nuclei.The peak latency of N1 recorded on the cuneate nucleus was identical with the scalp-recorded far-field potential of P13–14 in all patients, while no scalp components were found which corresponded to P2. These findings support the previous assumption that the scalp-recorded P13–14 is generated by the presynaptic activities of the dorsal column fibers at their terminals in the cuneate nucleus.     

The assessment of severe head injury by short-latency somatosensory and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials

The relative prognostic value of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) was assessed in 35 patients with post-traumatic coma. Analysis of the evoked potentials was restricted to those recorded within the first 4 days following head injury. Abnormal SEPs were defined as an increase in central somatosensory conduction time or an absence of the initial cortical potential following stimulation of either median nerve. Abnormal BAEPs were classified as an increase in the wave I–V interval or the loss of any or all of its 3 most stable components (waves I, III and V) following stimulation of either ear. SEPs reliably both good and bad outcomes. All 17 patients in whom SEPs were graded as normal had a favourable outcome and 15 of 18 patients in whom SEPs were abnormal had an unfavourable outcome. Although abnormal BAEPs were associated with an unfavourable outcome in almost all patients (6 of 7), only 19 of 28 patients with normal BAEPs had a favourable outcome. The finding of normal BAEPs was therefore of little prognostic significance. These results confirm the superiority and greater sensitivity of the SEP in detecting abnormalities of brain function shortly after severe head trauma.     

Abnormalities of parietal and prerolandic somatosensory evoked potentials in Huntington's disease

Cervical, parietal and prerolandic somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation at the wrist were recorded with an earlobe reference in 24 patients with Huntington's disease (HD) and in 24 age-matched normal controls. Cortical responses of abnormal wave form and reduced amplitude were constantly observed in HD patients. SEP changes affected more severely the prerolandic (P22/N30) pattern, which could not be recognized in two-thirds of patients, than the parietal (N20/P27) pattern, which could be identified in all cases. The N20 latency and the central conduction time (N13–N20 interval) were significantly increased. The occurrence of abnormalities of central conduction and of a predominant involvement of the prerolandic SEP pattern suggests an impairment of impulse transmission along the somatosensory lemniscal pathway at subcortical, possibly thalamic, level in HD.     

Topographic analyses of somatosensory evoked potentials following stimulation of tibial,sural and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves

Using topographic maps, we studied the scalp field distribution of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in response to the stimulation of the tibial (TN), sural (SN) and lateral femoral cutaneous (LFCN) nerves in 24 normal volunteers. Cortical peaks, i.e., N35, P40, N50 and P60 were generally dominant in the contralateral hemisphere for the LFCN-SEP, whereas all peaks except N35 had dominance in the ipsilateral hemisphere for TN- and SN-SEPs. The findings imply that ipsilateral or contralateral peak dominance for the lower extremity SEP is determined by where the cortical leg representation occurs. As a result, mesial hemisphere representation results in peak dominance projected to the hemisphere ipsilateral to stimulation. Representations at the superior lip of the interhemispheric fissure or lateral convexity lead to midline or contralateral peak dominance. These findings also suggest that the paradoxically lateralized P40 is not the result of a positive field dipole shadow generated by the primary negative wave in the mesial hemisphere, but is the primary positive wave, analogous to P26 of the median nerve SEP. Accordingly, contralaterally dominant N35 is likely equivalent to the first cortical potential of N20 in the median nerve SEP. The difference in vector directions of potential fields between N35 and P40 may account for the opposite hemispheric dominance for these peaks in TN- and SN-SEPs.     

Giant central N20-P22 with normal area 3b N20-P20: an argument in favour of an area 3a generator of early median nerve cortical SEPs?

Generators of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) still remain to be precisely localised. This gap in knowledge has often resulted in unclear and contrasting SEPs localisation in patients with focal hemispheric lesions. We recorded SEPs to median nerve stimulation in a patient with right frontal astrocytoma, using a 19-channel recording technique. After stimulation of the left median nerve, N20 amplitude was normal when recorded by the parietal electrode contralateral to the stimulation, while it was abnormally enhanced in traces obtained by the contralateral central electrode. The amplitude of the frontal P20 response was within normal limits. This finding suggests that two dipolar sources, tangential and radial to the scalp surface, respectively, contribute concomitantly to N20 generation. The possible location of the N20 radial source in area 3a is discussed. The P22 potential was also recorded with increased amplitude by the central electrode contralateral to the stimulation, while N30 amplitude was normal in frontal and central traces. We propose that the radial dipolar source of P22 response is independent from both N20 and N30 generators and can be located either in 3a or in area 4. This report illustrates the usefulness of multichannel recordings in diagnosing dysfunction of the sensorimotor cortex in focal cortical lesions.     

Unmasking of cortical SEP components by changes in stimulus rate: a topographic study

We performed topographic mapping of somatosensory responses to median nerve stimulation delivered at 2, 5 and 10 Hz. Parietal N20 was significantly attenuated in 10 Hz somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), while central P22 diminished between 2 and 5 Hz, remaining stable thereafter. The single component most affected by increasing stimulus rate was N30, which abated by more than 50% in 10 Hz SEPs, as compared with basal responses. N30 attenuation disclosed the existence of an earlier negative component, N24, which appeared as a notch on the N30 ascending slope in 2 Hz SEPs, but became a well-defined peak at higher stimulus rates. The N24 negativity was not significantly modified by stimulus rate; it had a parietal counterpart (P24) with the same peak latency and identical behavior during the experimental procedure. Both P24 and N24 could be differentiated from central P22 on the basis of topographical distribution and response to stimulus frequency. P22 topography could be the result of a radially oriented generator, while P24/N24 appeared as the two poles of a neural source tangential to the scalp. P27 was seen in 40% of the subjects only; it is suggested that P27 is itself a composite potential to which the generator of N30 could contribute in part. We conclude that there is no single “optimal” stimulation rate for SEP recording. On the contrary, combination of different frequencies of stimulation should enhance the diagnostic utility of this technique by allowing a more selective assessment of overlapping activities.     

Parameters of somatosensory evoked potentials in normal subjects in relation to age and height

Cortical SEPs by stimulation of median nerve at wrist (159 measurements; 144 subjects, 63 M - 81 F; mean age 39.7, range 11-70; mean height 162.5, range 134-190) and cortical SEPs by stimulation of posterior tibial nerve at ankle (100 measurements; 81 subjects, 37 M - 44 F; mean age 34.7, range 11-60; mean height 161.1, range 134-180 cm) have been performed. The latencies of N1 of median SEPs and of N1 and P1 of tibial SEPs significantly increase with the height of subjects. The statistical evaluation of latency values of each subject normalized at a height of 165 cm show a little increase of latency according to the age of the subjects; this increase is quite evident for the latency of P1 of tibial SEP.     

SEPs in two patients with localized lesions of the postcentral gyrus

Scalp distributions of median nerve SEPs were studied in normal controls and 2 patients with localized lesions of the postcentral gyrus. In controls, parieto-occipital electrodes registered N20-P27 while frontal electrodes registered P20-N27. Other small components, parieto-occipital P22 and frontal N22, were recognized in about half of the control records. The wave forms at a frontal and a parieto-occipital electrode, both distant from the central region, formed exact mirror images of each other concerning N20-(P22)-P27 and P20-(N22)-N27. Electrodes near the central region contralateral to the stimulation registered cP22-cN30 (central P22 and central N30). When the postcentral gyrus was damaged, N20/P20-P27/N27 and cP22-cN30 were eliminated and the only remaining components were a frontal negative wave (frN) and a contralateral parieto-occipital positive wave (poP). Digital nerve stimulation also evoked poP and frN in both cases. In case 2, poP coincided with P22 of the non-affected side. The following generators were proposed; N20/P20-P27/N27: area 3b, cP22-cN30: areas 1 and 2, poP/early frN (= P22/N22): area 4 at the anterior wall of the central sulcus (due to direct thalamic inputs to motor cortex), late frN: uncertain (SMA?, SII?).     

SEPs to finger joint input lack the N20-P20 response that is evoked by tactile inputs: contrast between cortical generators in areas 3b and 2 in humans

A method using a DC servo motor is described to produce brisk angular movements at finger interphalangeal joints in humans. Small passive flexions of 2° elicited sizable somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) starting with a contralateral positive P34 parietal response thought to reflect activation of a radial equivalent dipole generator in area 2 which receives joint inputs. By contrast, electric stimulation of tactile (non-joint) inputs from the distal phalanx evoked the usual contralateral negative N20 reflecting a tangential equivalent dipole generator in area 3b. Finger joint inputs also evoked a precentral positivity equivalent to the P22 of motor area 4, and a large frontal negativity equivalent to N30. It is suggested that natural stimulation allows human SEP components to the differentiated in conjunction with distinct cortical somatotopic projections.     

Scalp-recorded short and middle latency peroneal somatosensory evoked potentials in normals: comparison with peroneal and median nerve SEPs in patients with unilateral hemispheric lesions

Peroneal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were performed on 23 normal subjects and 9 selected patients with unilateral hemispheric lesions involving somatosensory pathways.Recording obtained from right and left peroneal nerve (PN) stimulations were compared in all subjects, using open and restricted frequency bandpass filters. Restricted filter (100–3000 Hz) and linked ear reference (A1–A2) enhanced the detection of short latency potentials (P1, P2, N1 with mean peak latency of 17.72, 21.07, 24.09) recorded from scalp electrodes over primary sensory cortex regions. Patients with lesions in the parietal cortex and adjacent subcortical areas demonstrated low amplitude and poorly formed short latency peroneal potentials, and absence of components beyond P3 peak with mean latency of 28.06 msec. In these patients, recordings to right and left median nerve (MN) stimulation showed absence or distorted components subsequent to N1 (N18) potential.These observations suggest that components subsequent to P3 potential in response to PN stimulation, and subsequent to N18 potential in response to MN stimulation, are generated in the parietal cortical regions.     

Maps of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to mechanical (tapping) stimuli: comparison with P14, N20, P22, N30 of electrically elicited SEPs

Bit mapped color imaging of SEPs was recorded from 19 derivations in 11 healthy volunteers after electrical stimulation of the median nerve at the wrist, index finger digital nerve stimulation, and mechanical stimulation of the index fingertips by an electromechanically driven vibrating thin metallic plate. The latencies of SEP components increased for the various stimulation modalities, being shortestafter median nerve stimulation at the wrist and longest after mechanical stimulation of the index fingertips.The scalp distribution of SEPs to mechanical stimuli was, however, the same as other SEPs, independently of the stimulation employed, and components corresponding to N20 and P22 were recorded only contralaterally to the stimulated side.     

Effect of sleep stage on somatosensory evoked potentials by median nerve stimulation

The effects of sleep stage on early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and short-latency components elicited by median nerve stimulation were studied in 12 normal volunteers. The latency of P13 in the awake stage was not significantly different from that in any sleep stage. The latencies of N16, N20 and P20 were significantly prolonged while the amplitude of N20 was decreased during the non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep stage. P22, P23 and N24 components showed double peaks (P23a, P23b, N24a, N24b) during the NREM sleep stage in 6 subjects, while N24 showed a single peak and only P22 and P23 showed double peaks in 5 other subjects. The latencies and morphologies of SEPs during rapid eye movement sleep stage were almost the same as those during the awake stage. These findings suggest that NREM sleep affects the latency, amplitude and morphology of N16 and early cortical components.     

Peri-rolandic and fronto-parietal components of scalp-recorded giant SEPs in cortical myoclonus

Scalp topography of giant SEPs to median nerve stimulation was studied in 4 patients with cortical myoclonus of various etiology. The positive peak (P30) at the contralateral parietal area was simultaneously accompanied by a negative peak at the frontal area (N30), and at least one of these two peaks was enhanced in 2 patients. Another positive peak (P25) and a negative peak (N35) were also identified at the peri-rolandic area with different latency from P30 and N30, respectively, in all patients. N35 was enhanced in 3 patients, and P25 in 2 patients. It is concluded that, as seen in normal subjects, tangential (P30-N30) and radial (P25 and N35) components of SEPs are most likely distinguishable in giant SEPs, and that either one or both of those components is enhanced in different ways depending on the patients.     

Frontal distribution of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation

The topography of early frontal SEPs (P20 and N26) to left median nerve stimulation was studied in 30 normal subjects and 3 patients with the left frontal bone defect. The amplitudes of P20 and N26 were maximum at the frontal electrode (F4) contralateral to the stimulation and markedly decreased at frontal electrodes ipsilateral to the site of stimulation. There was, however, no latency difference of P20 and N26 between ipsilateral and contralateral frontal electrodes. These results suggest that the origin of the ipsilateral and contralateral P20 and N26 is the same. The wide distribution of P20 and N26 over both frontal areas could be explained by assuming a smearing effect from generators actually located in the rolandic fissure and motor cortex.     

Somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex revealed by dipole source analysis of early somatosensory evoked potentials and 3D-NMR tomography

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve and finger stimulation were analyzed by means of spatio-temporal dipole modelling combined with 3D-NMR tomography in 8 normal subjects. The early SEPs were modelled by 3 equivalent dipoles located in the region of the brain-stem (B) and in the region of the contralateral somatosensory cortex (T and R). Dipole B explained peaks P14 and N18 at the scalp. Dipole T was tangentially oriented and explained the N20-P20, dipole R was radially oriented and modelled the P22. The tangential dipole sources T were located within a distance of 6 mm on the average and all were less than 9 mm from the posterior bank of the central sulcus. In 6 subjects the tangential sources related to finger stimulation arranged along the central sulcus according to the known somatotopy. The radial sources did not show a consistent somatotopic alignment across subjects. We conclude that the combination of dipole source analysis and 3D-NMR tomography is a useful tool for functional localization within the human hand somatosensory cortex.     

Bit-mapped imaging of somatosensory evoked potentials after stimulation of the posterior tibial nerves and dorsal nerve of the penis / clitoris

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to unilateral or bilateral posterior tibial nerve (PTN) stimulation and to stimulation of the dorsal nerve (DN) of the penis / clitoris were recorded on 32 channels in 10 volunteers. SEPs to unilateral PTN stimulation consisted of the classic ‘W’ complex P38-N45-P56-N75 maximal on the ipsilateral central and parietal leads, and two negative waves, N33 and N37, maximal on the contralateral post- and prerolandic areas, respectively. A lemniscal P30 was also recorded. Bilateral PTN stimulation caused, by algebraic summation, the disappearance of both N33 and N37; the W complex was symmetrical and the amplitude of P30 increased. The SEPs to DN stimulation were also symmetrical, and N33 and N37 were absent. These features can be explained by the bilateral character of DN stimulation. They also differed from bilateral PTN SEPs in 3 respects; the absence of P30, the small amplitude and the weaker gradients of field distribution of the ‘W’ complex, and the somewhat different distribution of penile from clitoral or bilateral PTN, N45 and P56. These differences can be explained both by physiological (the different fiber composition of the DN) and anatomical (the deeper localization of the DN cortical receiving area) mechanisms.