Dosimetric comparison of normal breathing and deep inspiration breath hold technique for synchronous bilateral breast cancer using 6MV flattened beam and flattening filter free beam

BackgroundThe present study was to investigate the usefulness of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) in bilateral breast patients using 6MV flattened beam (FB) and flattening filter free beam (FFFB).Materials and methodsTwenty bilateral breast cancer patients were simulated, using left breast patients treated with DIBH technique. CT scans were performed in the normal breathing (NB) and DIBH method. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated.ResultsIn our study the best organ at risk (OAR) sparing is achieved in the 3DCRT DIBH plan with adequate PTV coverage (V₉₅ ≥ 47.5 Gy) as compared to 6MV FB and FFFB VMAT DIBH plans. The DIBH scan plan reduces the heart mean dose significantly at the rate of 49% in 3DCRT (p = 0.00) and 22% in VMAT (p = 0.010). Similarly, the DIBH scan plan produces lesser common lung mean dose of 18% in 3DCRT (p = 0.011) and 8% in VMAT (0.007) as compared to the NB scan. The conformity index is much better in VMAT FB (1.04 ± 0.04 vs. 1.04 ± 0.05), p =1.00 and VMAT FFFB (1.04 ± 0.05 vs. 1 ± 0.24, p = 0.345) plans as compared to 3DCRT (1.63 ± 0.2 vs. 1.47 ± 0.28, p = 0.002). The homogeneity index of all the plans is less than 0.15. The global dmax is more in VMAT FFFB DIBH plan (113.7%). The maximum MU noted in the NB scan plan (478 vs. 477MU, 1366 vs. 1299 MU and 1853 vs. 1788 MU for 3DCRT, VMAT FB and VMAT FFFB technique as compared to DIBH scan.ConclusionWe recommend that the use of DIBH techniques for bilateral breast cancer patients significantly reduces the radiation doses to OARs in both 3DCRT and VMAT plans.     

Hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy for chest wall irradiation: For a good plan,get the right mixture

PurposeTo find the optimal dose weighting for hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT), a combination of conventional 3DCRT and VMAT plans for left sided chest wall and supraclavicular radiation therapy.Methods & materials20 left-sided breast cancer patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy were considered for this study. To find the optimal weighting, 5 H-VMAT plans were generated for each study case by combining different dose proportions of 3DCRT and VMAT plans including: 90% 3DCRT/10% VMAT, 80% 3DCRT/20% VMAT, 70% 3DCRT/30% VMAT, 60% 3DCRT/40% VMAT, 50% 3DCRT/50% VMAT. Further field-in-field, optimal H-VMAT and VMAT alone plans were compared.ResultsAll H-VMAT plans achieved the expected target coverage. A higher conformity index was achieved for 50% 3DCRT/50% VMAT plan, while better homogeneity index was achieved for 80% 3DCRT/20% VMAT plan. Mean and low doses were less in 90% 3DCRT/10% VMAT plan. Compared with other proportions, 80% 3DCRT/20% VMAT and 70% 3DCRT/30% VMAT weighted H-VMAT plans achieved balanced results for PTVs and OARs.ConclusionThe optimal dose mixture for H-VMAT technique is 70% to 80% for 3DCRT and 20% to 30% for VMAT. The optimal H-VMAT achieved balanced results for the PTVs and OARs compared with field-in-field and VMAT alone plans.     

Examination of the dose distribution of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy using a high-definition multi-leaf collimator for breast cancer patients with irradiated regional lymph nodes

BackgroundA high-definition multi-leaf collimator (HD-MLC) with 5- and 10-mm fine MLCs is useful for radiotherapy. However, it is difficult to irradiate the mammary gland and supraclavicular region using a HD-MLC because of the narrow field of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the dose distribution of the VMAT dose using a HD-MLC in 15 patients with left breast cancer undergoing postoperative irradiation of breast and regional lymph nodes, including the internal mammary node.Materials and methodsThe following four plans were generated: three-arc VMAT using HD-MLC (HD-VMAT), two tangential arcs and one-arc VMAT using HD-MLC (tHD-VMAT), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) using HD-MLC, and two-arc VMAT using the Millennium 120-leaf MLC (M-VMAT). We assessed the doses to the target volume and organs at risk.ResultsThe target dose distributions were higher for HD-VMAT than 3DCRT. There were no significant differences in the heart mean dose (D_mean) or lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V20 Gy) between HD-VMAT and 3DCRT. The heart D_mean and lung V20 Gy of tHD-VMAT were higher than those of HD-VMAT, and the heart D_mean of M-VMAT was higher than that of HD-VMAT. However, the target doses of tHD-VMAT, M-VMAT, and HD-VMAT were equivalent.ConclusionsIn cases of the mammary gland and regional lymph node irradiation, including the internal mammary node in patients with left breast cancer, HD-VMAT was not inferior to M-VMAT and provided a better dose distribution to the target volume and organs at risk compared with 3DCRT and tHD-VMAT.     

Dosimetric impact of volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment

BackgroundThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the toxicity and outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated using 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique.Materials and methods68 patients treated between 2006 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Since 2009 patients received 3DCRT with 50/70 Gy to the elective/boost volumes in 35 fractions; from then, VMAT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with 54.45/69.96 Gy in 33, or 54/66 Gy in 30 fractions. Induction chemotherapy was administered in 74% of the patients, concomitant cisplatinum in 87%. Acute and late toxicity data, progression-free survival PSF and overall survival OS, and toxicity correlations with dose metrics were reported.ResultsWith a median follow-up of 64 months, complete remission at the last evaluation was in 68% of the patients, while 28% and 9% had locoregional relapse and distant disease, respectively. The 5- and 10-year progression free survival (PFS) rates were 62.7 ± 6.5% and 53.2 ± 8.7%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 78.9 ± 5.5% and 61.4 ± 9.2%, respectively. At the multivariate Cox analysis TNM stage (p = 0.02) and concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.01) resulted significant for PFS, concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.04) for OS.Improvements in acute toxicity were presented for VMAT patients due to its ability to spare OARs. Odds ratio (OR) for acute salivary toxicity, between VMAT and 3DCRT, was 4.67 (p = 0.02). Dosimetrically, salivary toxicity correlated with mean parotid dose (p = 0.05), dysphagia with laryngeal (p = 0.04) and mean oral cavity (p = 0.06) doses, when dose-volume histograms (DVHs) are corrected for fractionation.ConclusionThis study is a proof of a significant benefit of the VMAT technique compared with 3DCRT in terms of side effects in nasopharynx patients, and adds dosimetric correlations.     

Critical Structure Sparing in Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Central Lung Lesions: Helical Tomotherapy vs. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Background

Helical tomotherapy (HT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are both advanced techniques of delivering intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Here, we conduct a study to compare HT and partial-arc VMAT in their ability to spare organs at risk (OARs) when stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is delivered to treat centrally located early stage non-small-cell lung cancer or lung metastases.

Methods

12 patients with centrally located lung lesions were randomly chosen. HT, 2 & 8 arc (Smart Arc, Pinnacle v9.0) plans were generated to deliver 70 Gy in 10 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV). Target and OAR dose parameters were compared. Each technique’s ability to meet dose constraints was further investigated.

Results

HT and VMAT plans generated essentially equivalent PTV coverage and dose conformality indices, while a trend for improved dose homogeneity by increasing from 2 to 8 arcs was observed with VMAT. Increasing the number of arcs with VMAT also led to some improvement in OAR sparing. After normalizing to OAR dose constraints, HT was found to be superior to 2 or 8-arc VMAT for optimal OAR sparing (meeting all the dose constraints) (p = 0.0004). All dose constraints were met in HT plans. Increasing from 2 to 8 arcs could not help achieve optimal OAR sparing for 4 patients. 2/4 of them had 3 immediately adjacent structures.

Conclusion

HT appears to be superior to VMAT in OAR sparing mainly in cases which require conformal dose avoidance of multiple immediately adjacent OARs. For such cases, increasing the number of arcs in VMAT cannot significantly improve OAR sparing.     

Dosimetric comparison of left-sided whole-breast irradiation with 3DCRT,forward-planned IMRT,inverse-planned IMRT,helical tomotherapy,and volumetric arc therapy

PurposeThis study evaluated the dose distribution and homogeneity of four different types of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in comparison with standard wedged tangential-beam three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) of the left breast in patients who had undergone lumpectomy.Materials and methodsFive radiotherapy treatment plans, including 3DCRT, forward-planned IMRT (for-IMRT), inverse IMRT (inv-IMRT), helical tomotherapy (HT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), were created for 15 consecutive patients.ResultsAll modalities presented similar target coverage. Target max doses were reduced with for-IMRT compared to 3DCRT, and these doses were further reduced with inv-IMRT and HT. HT resulted in the lowest max doses delivered to the heart, left anterior descending artery (LAD), and ipsilateral lung, but had higher mean, max, and low doses delivered to contralateral breast. HT resulted in increased low doses to a large volume of healthy tissue. Compared to other techniques, all inverse-planned modalities significantly improved conformity number; however, VMAT had worse homogeneity. The for-IMRT plan significantly lowered monitor unit (MU) compared to the inverse-planned techniques.ConclusionAll modalities evaluated provide adequate coverage of the whole breast. For-IMRT improves target homogeneity compared with 3DCRT, but to a lesser degree than the inverse-planned inv-IMRT and HT. HT decreases the ipsilateral OAR volumes receiving higher and mean doses with an increase in the volumes receiving low doses, which is known to lead to an increased rate of radiation-induced secondary malignancies.     

Analysis of a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) single phase prostate template as a class solution

AimTo assess a class solution template for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer using plan analysis software.BackgroundVMAT is a development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with potential advantages for the delivery of radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer. Class solutions are increasingly used for facilitating RT planning. Plan analysis software provides an objective tool for evaluating class solutions.Materials and methodsThe class solution for VMAT was based on the current static field IMRT template. The plans of 77 prostate cancer patients were evaluated using a set of in-house plan quality metrics (scores) (PlanIQ™, Sun Nuclear Corporation). The metrics compared the class solution for VMAT planning with the IMRT template and the delivered clinical plan (CP). Eight metrics were associated with target coverage and ten with organs-at-risk (OAR). Individual metrics were summed and the combined scores were subjected to non-parametric analysis. The low-dose wash for both static IMRT and VMAT plans were evaluated using 40 Gy and 25 Gy isodose volumes.ResultsVMAT plans were of equal or better quality than the IMRT template and CP for target coverage (combined score) and OAR combined score. The 40 Gy isodose volume was marginally higher with VMAT than IMRT (4.9%) but lower than CP (−6.6%)(P = 0.0074). The 25 Gy volume was significantly lower with VMAT than both IMRT (−32.7%) and CP (−34.4%)(P < 0.00001).ConclusionsAutomated VMAT planning for prostate cancer is feasible and the plans are equal to or better than the current IMRT class solution and the delivered clinical plan.     

Dosimetric predictors of acute bone marrow toxicity in carcinoma cervix — experience from a tertiary cancer centre in India

BackgroundThe objective of this study was To determine the dose volume parameters predicting acute haematological toxicity in carcinoma cervix patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Materials and methodsAll patients that presented to the hospital between Jan 2019 and Dec 2019 were prospectively analyzed. Patients diagnosed to have Carcinoma Cervix and planned for concurrent chemoradiation by volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were included for analysis. Patients were assessed at baseline and every week during treatment for acute haematological toxicities. Dose volume parameters from treatment plans were correlated with RTOG grade of haematological toxicities.ResultsA total of 34 patients diagnosed to have squamous cell carcinoma of cervix were treated by radical radiotherapy by VMAT technique and concurrent chemotherapy. The most common stage of presentation was stage IIB (61.7%). 29 patients (85.2%) completed five cycles of weekly cisplatin. Statistical analysis for sensitivity and specificity of dosimetric parameters was performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The probability of developing bone marrow toxicity was analyzed using T test. Mean dose to bone marrow exceeding 28.5 Gy was significantly associated with bone marrow toxicity (sensitivity — 82.4%, specificity — 70.6%). On analyzing dose volume parameters, volume of bone marrow receiving 20 Gy, 30 Gy and 40 Gy (V20, V30 and V40) more than 71.75%, and 49.75% and 22.85%, respectively, was significantly associated with bone marrow toxicity.ConclusionsOur study concludes that mean dose to bone marrow exceeding 28.5 Gy has high sensitivity and specificity for predicting bone marrow toxicity in patients receiving IMRT. Volume of bone marrow receiving 20 Gy, 30 Gy and 40 Gy significantly correlated with acute haematological toxicity.     

Novel knowledge-based treatment planning model for hypofractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients

PurposeTo demonstrate the strength of an innovative knowledge-based model-building method for radiotherapy planning using hypofractionated, multi-target prostate patients.Material and methodsAn initial RapidPlan model was trained using 48 patients who received 60 Gy to prostate (PTV60) and 44 Gy to pelvic nodes (PTV44) in 20 fractions. To improve the model's goodness-of-fit, an intermediate model was generated using the dose-volume histograms of best-spared organs-at-risk (OARs) of the initial model. Using the intermediate model and manual tweaking, all 48 cases were re-planned. The final model, trained using these re-plans, was validated on 50 additional patients. The validated final model was used to determine any planning advantage of using three arcs instead of two on 16 VMAT cases and tested on 25 additional cases to determine efficacy for single-PTV (PTV60-only) treatment planning.ResultsFor model validation, PTV V_95% of 99.9% was obtained by both clinical and knowledge-based planning. D_1% was lower for model plans: by 1.23 Gy (PTV60, CI = [1.00, 1.45]), and by 2.44 Gy (PTV44, CI = [1.72, 3.16]). OAR sparing was superior for knowledge-based planning: ΔD_mean = 3.70 Gy (bladder, CI = [2.83, 4.57]), and 3.22 Gy (rectum, CI = [2.48, 3.95]); ΔD_2% = 1.17 Gy (bowel bag, CI = [0.64, 1.69]), and 4.78 Gy (femoral heads, CI = [3.90, 5.66]). Using three arcs instead of two, improvements in OAR sparing and PTV coverage were statistically significant, but of magnitudes < 1 Gy. The model failed at reliable DVH predictions for single PTV plans.ConclusionsOur knowledge-based model delivers efficient, consistent plans with excellent PTV coverage and improved OAR sparing compared to clinical plans.     

Radiotherapy for the treatment of pituitary adenomas: A dosimetric comparison of three planning techniques

AimOur goal was to compare conformal 3D (C3D) radiotherapy (RT), modulated intensity RT (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning techniques in treating pituitary adenomas.BackgroundRT is important for managing pituitary adenomas. Treatment planning advances allow for higher radiation dosing with less risk of affecting organs at risk (OAR).Materials and methodsWe conducted a 5-year retrospective review of patients with pituitary adenoma treated with external beam radiation therapy (C3D with flattening filter, flattening filter-free [FFF], IMRT, and VMAT). We compared dose-volume histogram data. For OARs, we recorded D2%, maximum, and mean doses. For planning target volume (PTV), we registered V95%, V107%, D95%, D98%, D50%, D2%, minimum dose, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI).ResultsFifty-eight patients with pituitary adenoma were included. Target-volume coverage was acceptable for all techniques. The HI values were 0.06, IMRT; 0.07, VMAT; 0.08, C3D; and 0.09, C3D FFF (p < 0.0001). VMAT and IMRT provided the best target volume conformity (CI, 0.64 and 0.74, respectively; p < 0.0001). VMAT yielded the lowest doses to the optic pathway, lens, and cochlea. The position of the neck in extreme flexion showed that it helps in planning mainly with VMAT by allowing only one arc to be used and achieving the desired conformity, decreasing the treatment time, while allowing greater protection to the organs of risk using C3D, C3DFFF.ConclusionsOur results confirmed that EBRT in pituitary adenomas using IMRT, VMAT, C3D, C3FFF provide adequate coverage to the target. VMAT with a single arc or incomplete arc had a better compliance with desired dosimetric goals, such as target coverage and normal structures dose constraints, as well as shorter treatment time. Neck extreme flexion may have benefits in treatment planning for better preservation of organs at risk. C3D with extreme neck flexion is an appropriate treatment option when other treatment techniques are not available.     

Dosimetric impact of statistical uncertainty on Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy using Monaco TPS for three different clinical cases

AimTo study the dosimetric impact of statistical uncertainty (SU) per plan on Monte Carlo (MC) calculation in Monaco? treatment planning system (TPS) during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for three different clinical cases.BackgroundDuring MC calculation SU is an important factor to decide dose calculation accuracy and calculation time. It is necessary to evaluate optimal acceptance of SU for quality plan with reduced calculation time.Materials and methodsThree different clinical cases as the lung, larynx, and prostate treated using VMAT technique were chosen. Plans were generated with Monaco? V5.11 TPS with 2% statistical uncertainty. By keeping all other parameters constant, plans were recalculated by varying SU, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5%. For plan evaluation, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), dose coverage to PTV, organ at risk (OAR) dose, normal tissue receiving dose ≥5 Gy and ≥10 Gy, integral dose (NTID), calculation time, gamma pass rate, calculation reproducibility and energy dependency were analyzed.ResultsCI and HI improve as SU increases from 0.5% to 5%. No significant dose difference was observed in dose coverage to PTV, OAR doses, normal tissue receiving dose ≥5 Gy and ≥10 Gy and NTID. Increase of SU showed decrease in calculation time, gamma pass rate and increase in PTV max dose. No dose difference was seen in calculation reproducibility and dependent on energy.ConclusionFor VMAT plans, SU can be accepted from 1% to 3% per plan with reduced calculation time without compromising plan quality and deliverability by accepting variations in point dose within the target.     

Dose-escalated volumetric modulated arc therapy for total marrow irradiation: A feasibility dosimetric study with 4DCT planning and simultaneous integrated boost

PurposeTo evaluate the planning feasibility of dose-escalated total marrow irradiation (TMI) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the active bone marrow (ABM) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and to assess the impact of using planning organs at risk (OAR) volumes (PRV) accounting for breathing motion in the optimization.MethodsFive patients underwent whole-body CT and thoraco-abdominal 4DCT. A planning target volume (PTV) including all bones and ABM was contoured on each whole-body CT. PRV of selected OAR (liver, heart, kidneys, lungs, spleen, stomach) were determined with 4DCT. Planning consisted of 9–10 full 6 MV photon VMAT arcs. Four plans were created for each patient with 12 Gy prescribed to the PTV, with or without an additional 4 Gy SIB to the ABM. Planning dose constraints were set on the OAR or on the PRV. Planning objective was a PTV D_mean < 110% of the prescribed dose, a PTV V_110% < 50%, and OAR D_mean ≤ 50–60%.ResultsPTV D_mean < 110% was accomplished for most plans (n = 18/20), while all achieved V_110%<50%. SIB plans succeeded to optimally cover the boost volume (median ABM D_mean = 16.3 Gy) and resulted in similar OAR sparing compared to plans without SIB (median OAR D_mean = 40–54% of the ABM prescribed dose). No statistically significant differences between plans optimized with constraints on OAR or PRV were found.ConclusionsAdding a 4 Gy SIB to the ABM for TMI is feasible with VMAT technique, and results in OAR sparing similar to plans without SIB. Setting dose constraints on PRV does not impair PTV dosimetric parameters.     

Relations between doses cumulated in bone marrow and dose delivery techniques during radiation therapy of cervical and endometrial cancer

PurposeTo compare normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and average doses in the bone marrow (BM), obtained for five different radiotherapy delivery and planning strategies of cervical and endometrial cancer.Material/methods50 patients were taken to analysis. For each case, 3 different dose delivery techniques were used: 4-field, X15MV, 3DCRT; 7-field, X6MV, IMRT; and 2-arc, X6MV, VMAT. Two optimization scenarios were used for the IMRT and VMAT plans generation: with (+) and without (−) the inclusion of the BM as an optimized structure. Average doses and dose-volume histogram parameters for the PTV, BM, bladder, rectum, bowels and femoral heads were compared. In addition, the BM doses were analyzed with respect to the PTV and/or volume of the BM, and NTCP for the BM were computed.ResultsThe dose in PTV for evaluated plans was similar. The worst doses in organs at risk were obtained for 3DCRT. Using the BM during the optimization of IMRT and VMAT reduces an average dose in BM without increasing the doses in the bladder, rectum and bowels. Differences between doses in BM for IMRT(+) and VMAT(+) plans were similar while NTCP was lower for VMAT(+). A correlation between average dose in BM and the volume ratio of BM and PTV was found for each technique.ConclusionUsing the BM during the optimization of the IMRT and VMAT plans effectively reduces the dose in BM without increasing the dose in the bladder, rectum and bowels. The VMAT(+) plans were characterized by the lowest NTCP.     

Individually selected teletherapy technique for accelerated partial breast irradiation

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to individualize accelerated partial breast irradiation based on optimal dose distribution, protect risk organ and predict most advantageous technique.Materials and methods138 breast cancer patients receiving postoperative APBI were enrolled. APBI plans were generated using 3D-conformal (3D-CRT), sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In the case of superficial tumours, additional plans were developed by adding electron beam. To planning target volume (PTV) 37.5 Gy/10 fractions, 1 fraction/day was prescribed. A novel plan quality index (PQI) served as the basis for comparisons.ResultsIMRT was the most advantageous technique regarding homogeneity. VMAT provided best conformity, 3D-CR T — the lowest lung and heart exposure. PQI was the best in 45 (32.61%) VMAT, 13 (9.42%) IMRT, 9 (6.52%) 3D-CRT plans. In 71 cases (51.45%) no difference was detected. In patients with large PTV, 3D-CRT was the most favourable. Additional electron beam improved PQI of 3D-CRT plans but had no meaningful effect on IMRT or VMAT. IMRT was superior to VMAT if the tumour was superficial (p < 0.001), situated in the medial (p = 0.032) or upper quadrant (p = 0.046).ConclusionsIn half of all cases, individually selected teletherapy techniques provide superior results over others; relevance of a certain technique may be predicted by volume and PTV localization.     

Advanced optimization methods for whole pelvic and local prostate external beam therapy

PurposeRadiation treatment planning inherently involves multiple conflicting planning goals, which makes it a suitable application for multicriteria optimization (MCO). This study investigates a MCO algorithm for VMAT planning (VMAT–MCO) for prostate cancer treatments including pelvic lymph nodes and uses standard inverse VMAT optimization (sVMAT) and Tomotherapy planning as benchmarks.MethodsFor each of ten prostate cancer patients, a two stage plan was generated, consisting of a stage 1 plan delivering 22 Gy to the prostate, and a stage 2 plan delivering 50.4 Gy to the lymph nodes and 56 Gy to the prostate with a simultaneous integrated boost. The single plans were generated by three planning techniques (VMAT–MCO, sVMAT, Tomotherapy) and subsequently compared with respect to plan quality and planning time efficiency.ResultsPlan quality was similar for all techniques, but sVMAT showed slightly better rectum (on average D_mean −7%) and bowel sparing (D_mean −17%) compared to VMAT–MCO in the whole pelvic treatments. Tomotherapy plans exhibited higher bladder dose (D_mean +42%) in stage 1 and lower rectum dose (D_mean −6%) in stage 2 than VMAT–MCO. Compared to manual planning, the planning time with MCO was reduced up to 12 and 38 min for stage 1 and 2 plans, respectively.ConclusionMCO can generate highly conformal prostate VMAT plans with minimal workload in the settings of prostate-only treatments and prostate plus lymph nodes irradiation. In the whole pelvic plan manual VMAT optimization led to slightly improved OAR sparing over VMAT–MCO, whereas for the primary prostate treatment plan quality was equal.     

Clinical Outcomes for Gastric Cancer following Adjuvant Chemoradiation Utilizing Intensity Modulated versus Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy

Purpose/Objective(s)

To determine if intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the post-operative setting for gastric cancer was associated with reduced toxicity compared to 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT).

Materials/Methods

This retrospective study includes 24 patients with stage IB-IIIB gastric cancer consecutively treated from 2001–2010. All underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of 5-FU/leucovorin (n = 21), epirubicin/cisplatin/5FU (n = 1), or none (n = 2). IMRT was utilized in 12 patients and 3DCRT in 12 patients. For both groups, the target volume included the tumor bed, anastomosis, gastric stump, and regional lymphatics.

Results

Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 19 months (range 0.4–8.5 years), and 49 months (0.5–8.5 years) in surviving patients. The 3DCRT group received a median dose of 45 Gy, and the IMRT group received a median dose of 50.4 Gy (p = 0.0004). For the entire cohort, 3-year overall survival (OS) was 40% and 3-year disease free survival (DFS) was 41%. OS and DFS did not differ significantly between the groups. Acute toxicity was similar. Between 3DCRT and IMRT groups, during radiotherapy, median weight lost (3.2 vs. 3.3 kg, respectively; p = 0.47) and median percent weight loss were similar (5.0% vs. 4.3%, respectively; p = 0.43). Acute grade 2 toxicity was experienced by 8 patients receiving 3DCRT and 11 receiving IMRT (p = 0.32); acute grade 3 toxicity occurred in 1 patient receiving 3DCRT and none receiving IMRT (p = 1.0). No patients in either cohort experienced late grade 3 toxicity, including renal or gastrointestinal toxicity. At last follow up, the median increase in creatinine was 0.1 mg/dL in the IMRT group and 0.1 mg/dL in the 3DCRT group (p = 0.78).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric cancer with IMRT to 50.4 Gy was well-tolerated and compared similarly in toxicity with 3DCRT to 45 Gy.     

A new split arc VMAT technique for lymph node positive breast cancer

PurposeTo investigate different volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) field designs for lymph node positive breast cancer patients when compared to conventional static fields and standard VMAT designs.MethodsNineteen breast cancer patients with lymph node involvement (eleven left and eight right sided) were retrospectively analyzed with different arc designs. Proposed split arc designs with total rotations of 2 × 190° and 2 × 240° were compared to conventional field in field (FinF) and previously published non-split arc techniques with the same amount of total rotations.ResultsAll VMAT plans were superior in dose conformity, when compared to the FinF plans. Split arc design decreased significantly ipsilateral lung dose and heart V5Gy for both left and right sided cases, when compared to non-split VMAT designs. For left sided cases no significant differences were seen in contralateral lung mean dose or V5Gy between different VMAT designs. For right sided cases the contralateral lung dose V5Gy was significantly higher in split VMAT group, when compared to non-split VMAT designs. The contralateral breast dose V5Gy increased significantly for split VMAT plans for both sides, when compared to non-split VMAT designs or FinF plans.ConclusionsThe proposed split VMAT technique was shown to be superior to previously published non-split VMAT and conventional FinF techniques significantly reducing dose to the ipsilateral lung and heart. However, this came with the expense of an increase in the dose to the contralateral breast and for right-sided cases to the contralateral lung.     

Evaluation of results and costs of high precision radiotherapy (VMAT) compared with conventional radiotherapy (3D) in the treatment of cancer patients with spinal cord compression of metastatic origin

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the results and economic costs of using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) (5 fr × 5 Gy), compared with other conventional 3D radiotherapy schemes such as “5 × 4 Gy” and “10 × 3 Gy”.Materials and methodsThe data about the direct costs for the public health system was obtained from the Economic Information “Management per Patient” System available at the Integrated Health Organization Ezkerraldea Enkarterri Cruces. It is a model of real costs per patient which uses a bottom-up methodology which connects all sources of information generated in clinical practice, integrating healthcare information with economic information. This system presents the real cost per individualized patient, and shows the traceability of all clinical care. The costs of “typical patients” requiring hospital admission were identified for each of the three radiotherapy schemes based on the clinical activity and the material and human resources that were used.ResultsThe 5 × 5 Gy scheme has a cost of EUR 4,801.48, which is 1.64% higher (EUR 77) than the “5 × 4 Gy” scheme (EUR 4,724.05). The “10 × 3 Gy” scheme has a cost of EUR 8,394.61, which is 74.8% higher (EUR 3,593) than the “5 × 5 Gy” scheme. The main cost factor in the “10 × 3 Gy” scheme is hospitalization, since patients are at hospital for 2 weeks compared with 1 week in the “5 × 5 Gy” scheme.ConclusionsThe cost per patient of the VMAT “5 × 5 Gy” radiotherapy scheme is notably lower than that of the “10 × 3 Gy” scheme (conventional 3D radiotherapy), with the advantage of being administered in half the time. In relation to the scheme with 5 Gy × 4 sessions, the cost is similar to that of the “5 × 5 Gy” scheme.     

Dependence of the safe rectum dose on the CTV–PTV margin size and treatment technique

Background

Late rectal injury is a common side effect of external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate what total dose may be safely delivered for prostate patients for 3DCRT and IMRT techniques and the CTV–PTV margin.

Materials and methods

3DCRT and IMRT plans were prepared for 12 patients. For each patient PTV was defined with CTV–PTV margins of 0.4, 0.6, …, 1.0 cm, and total doses of 70, 72, …, 80 Gy, with 2 Gy dose fraction. NTCP values for the rectum were calculated using the Lyman model. Both techniques were compared in terms of population mean DVH.

Results

Significantly smaller NTCPs for IMRT were obtained. For both techniques diminishing the margin CTV–PTV of 2 mm leads to decreasing the NTCP of about 0.03. For total dose of 80 Gy the NTCP was smaller than 10% for the 4 mm margin only. The QUANTEC dose volume constraints were more frequently fulfilled for the IMRT technique than for the 3DCRT technique.

Conclusions

The IMRT technique is safer for prostate patients than the 3DCRT. If very high total doses are applied the CTV–PTV margin of 0.4 cm and the IMRT technique should be used. If the CTV–PTV margin of 0.6 cm is applied, the NTCP is smaller than 10% for the 3DCRT and IMRT techniques for the total doses smaller than 74 Gy and 78 Gy, respectively.