Mechanisms of early neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster

The neuroectoderm of insects contains an initially indifferent population of cells which during later development will give rise to the progenitor cells of the neural and epidermal lineages. Experimental evidence indicates that cellular interactions determine which cells will adopt each one of these fates. Transplantation experiments suggest that a signal with neuralising character is required to stabilize the primary neural fate in 25% of all the neuroectodermal cells, which will develop as neuroblasts, and that an epidermalising signal contributes to suppress the neural fate in the remaining 75% of the cells, allowing in this way their development as epidermal progenitor cells. The invoked cell interactions are assumed to be mediated by the products of several genes forming a complex, not yet well understood network of interrelationships. Elements of this network are the proteins encoded by Delta and Notch, which appear to convey the regulatory signals between the cells; the proteins encoded by the achaete-scute gene complex, which regulate neural development; and the proteins encoded by the Enhancer of split gene complex, which give neuroectodermal cells access to epidermal development. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Genetic and molecular mechanisms of neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster

Cells of the neurogenic ectoderm of insects have to decide between a neural and an epidermal fate. In Drosophila, this decision id mediated by cellular interactions. The products of two different groups of genes, i.e., the neurogenic genes and the genes of the achaete-scute complex and daughterless, seem to provide the molecular basis for the elements of a signal chain that permits the commitment of the cells to a given fate.     

Regulatory signals and signal molecules in early neurogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster

Summary The ectodermal germ layer of Drosophila melanogaster gives rise to two major cell lineages, the neural and the epidermal. Progenitor cells for each of these lineages arise from groups of cells, whose elements must decide between taking on either fate. Commitment of the progenitor cells to one of the developmental fates implies two factors. One is intrinsic to the ectodermal cells and determines a propensity to take on neural fate; this factor is probably represented by the products of the so-called proneural genes, which are differentially distributed throughout the ectoderm. The other factor in the cells' decision to adopt one of the two alternative fates is intercellular communication, which is mediated by the products of the so-called neurogenic genes. Two types of interactions, one inhibiting and the other stimulating neural development, have been inferred. We discuss here the assumed role of various neurogenic genes, in particular Notch and Delta, in these processes. Offprint requests to: J.A. Campos-Ortega     

The genetics of dopa decarboxylase in Drosophila melanogaster

Of 204 mutations located in the 8–12 band Df(2L)130 region, 37B9-C1,2;37D1-2, 199 have been assigned to twelve lethal genes and one visible gene (hook). The 13 genes are not evenly distributed. Twelve, (possibly all thirteen) are in the seven band region 37B10-C4 giving a gene-to-band ratio of almost two. Only one gene, 1(2)37Cf, may be in the four band region 37C5-7, and none are localized in band 37D1. In situ hybridization places the dopa decarboxylase structural gene, Ddc, in or very close to band 37C1,2 (Hirsh and Davidson, 1981). The methyl dopa hypersensitive gene, 1(2) amd, is 0.002 map units distal to Ddc. Df(2L)VA17, 37C1,2; 37F5-38A1 may actually break in the 37C1,2 singlet. It places six genes, hook, 1(2)amd, and four lethal genes, in a maximum of five bands, 37B10, 11, 12, 13 and perhaps part of the 37C1,2 singlet and localizes six genes, Ddc plus five lethal genes, in a maximum of three bands; probably part of the 37C1,2 singlet plus bands, C3, and C4. Wild type activity of five of twelve lethal genes is necessary for female fertility. — Band 37C5 puffs at the time of pupariation; Puff Stages 8–10. Twelve of eighteen alleles of 1(2)37Cf havs been examined as heterozygotes over CyO and none affect the appearance of a homozygous 37C5 puff. — Of the 204 mutations considered here only one Ddc ^p1, affects the function of more than one gene. It eliminates Ddc ⁺ and l(2) 37Ca ⁺ function and at 30 ° C reduces l(2)37Ce ⁺ function. It is not a deficiency but could be a polar mutant.Prof. Beermann's co-authors are very pleased to dedicate this paper to him in honor of his sixtieth birthday and in recognition of his seminal, most significant, extensive, and authoritive contributions on the functional organization of chromosomes     

The enhancer of split locus and neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster

Enhancer of split (E(spl)) is one of a group of so-called neurogenic genes of Drosophila. We describe two different types of E(spl) alleles, dominant and recessive, which exert opposite effects on both central and peripheral nervous system development. The only extant dominant allele determines a reduction in the number of central neurons and peripheral sensilla; this phenotype is not reduced by a normal complement of wild-type alleles. Since animals carrying a triploidy for the wild-type locus develop similar defects, the dominant allele is probably the result of a gain-of-function mutation. Several recessive alleles, obtained as revertants of the dominant allele, are loss-of-function mutations and determine considerable neural hyperplasia. The present evidence suggests that neural defects of E(spl) mutants are due to defective segregation of neural and epidermal lineages, leading to neural commitment of less or of more cells than in the wild type, depending upon whether the animals carry the dominant or any of the recessive alleles, respectively. Therefore, E(spl) formally behaves as a gene switching between neural and epidermal pathways.     

The genetics of position-effect variegation modifying loci in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary The dose dependent effects of position-effect variegation (PEV) modifying genes were studied in chromosome arms2L, 2R and3R. Four groups of PEV modifying genes can be distinguished: haplo-abnormal suppressor and enhancer loci with or without a triplo-effect. using duplications four triplo-abnormal suppressor and four triplo-abnormal enhancer functions were localized. In two cases we proved that these functions correspond to a converse haplo-abnormal one. Altogether 43 modifier loci were identified. Most of these loci proved not to display significant triplo-effects (35). The group of haplo-abnormal loci with a triplo-effect may represent genes which play an important role in heterochromatin packaging.     

Genetic mechanisms of early neurogenesis inDrosophila melanogaster

The neurogenic ectoderm ofDrosophila melanogaster consists of the ventral neuroectoderm and the procephalic neuroectoderm. It is hypothesized that epidermal and central neural progenitor cells separate from each other in three steps: conference on the neuroectodermal cells the capability of producing neural or epidermal progenies, separation of the two classes of progenitor cells, and specification of particular types of neuroblasts and epidermoblasts. Separation of neuroblasts and epidermoblasts in controlled by proneural and neurogenic genes.Delta andNotch serve as mediators of direct protein-protein interactions. E(spl)-C inhibits neurogenesis, creating epidermal cells. The achaete-scute complex (AS-C) controls the commitment of nonoverlapping populations of neuroblasts and leads the development of neuroectodermal cells as neuroblasts.     

The genetics and cytology of a mutator factor in Drosophila melanogaster

A Drosophila melanogaster mutator factor is described whose effects include the induction of unique chromosomal aberrations and male crossing over. Results of experiments to map the factor suggest that genetic transmission is somehow chromosomally associated but not localizable to the X, Y, second or third chromosome. There appears to be a good correlation between the distributions of male crossover exchange points and unique aberration breakpoints for the second chromosome but not for the third chromosome. The male crossovers, which occur more frequently in the centromeric region, occur in euchromatin rather than in the centric heterochromatin. The male crossovers tend to be rather precise reciprocal exchanges, since cytologically detectable deletions and duplications are only infrequently produced. It is suggested that the present mutator may be identical to earlier reported mutators of D. melanogaster.     

Regulatory interactions during early neurogenesis in Drosophila

During neurogenesis in Drosophila, ectodermal cells are endowed with the capacity to become neuronal precursors. Following their selection, these cells initiate neuronal lineage development and differentiation. The processes of neuronal precursor specification and neuronal lineage development require the activities of several groups of genes functioning in a complex, hierarchical regulatory network. Whereas the proneural genes promote neurogenic potential, neurogenic genes restrict the acquisition of this identity to a subset of ectodermal cells. Following their selection, these cells express the pan neural neuronal precursor genes and a set of neuronal lineage identity genes. While lineage identity genes allow the various lineages to acquire specific identities, neuronal precursor genes presumably regulate functional and developmental characteristics common to all neuronal precursor cells. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

The peripheral nervous system of mutants of early neurogenesis inDrosophila melanogaster

Summary Mutations previously known to affect early neurogenesis inDrosophila melanogaster have been found also to affect the development of the peripheral nervous system. Anti-HRP antibody staining has shown that larval epidermal sensilla of homozygous mutant embryos occur in increased numbers, which depend on the allele considered. This increase is apparently due to the development into sensory organs of cells which in the wild-type would have developed as non-sensory epidermis. Thus, neurogenic genes act whenever developing cells have to decide between neurogenic and epidermogenic fates, both in central and peripheral nervous systems. Different regions of the ectodermal germ layer are distinguished with respect to their neurogenic abilities.