Stable versus unstable orientations of sex chromosomes in two grasshopper species

The structural basis of orientation stability was investigated. The stable unipolar orientation of the Melanoplus sanguinipes X-chromosome univalent is unique in that it is stable without tension created by forces towards opposite poles; tension is thought to be the principle component in stabilizing kinetochore orientations to a pole. Stable orientation of the X chromosome in Melanoplus sanguinipes was compared with unstable X orientation in Melanoplus differentialis. Ten cells (five of each species) were studied, firstly in living cultures where chromosome behavior was followed, then by serial-section electron microscopy where the structural basis for chromosome behavior was examined. Microtubules other than kinetochore microtubules were observed impinging on the X chromosomes. One end of these microtubules was buried in chromatin, while the other ran towards a pole. The X chromosomes of M. sanguinipes had more of these microtubules than did M. differentialis X chromosomes. It is suggested that M. sanguinipes X chromosomes are less condensed than M. differentialis X chromosomes and so allow more microtubules to penetrate the chromosome. The extra microtubules impinging on the M. sanguinipes X chromosome probably prevent reorientation by inhibiting the turning of the chromosome towards the opposite pole, i.e., more force is needed to turn a kinetochore towards the opposite pole than can be generated and attempts at reorientation fail. This may be analogous to the effect that tension has on the orientation stability of bivalents.     

CHROMOSOME MICROMANIPULATION : III. Spindle Fiber Tension and the Reorientation of Mal-Oriented Chromosomes

Kinetochore reorientation is the critical process ensuring normal chromosome distribution. Reorientation has been studied in living grasshopper spermatocytes, in which bivalents with both chromosomes oriented to the same pole (unipolar orientation) occur but are unstable: sooner or later one chromosome reorients, the stable, bipolar orientation results, and normal anaphase segregation to opposite poles follows. One possible source of stability in bipolar orientations is the normal spindle forces toward opposite poles, which slightly stretch the bivalent. This tension is lacking in unipolar orientations because all the chromosomal spindle fibers and spindle forces are directed toward one pole. The possible role of tension has been tested directly by micromanipulation of bivalents in unipolar orientation to artificially create the missing tension. Without exception, such bivalents never reorient before the tension is released; a total time "under tension" of over 5 hr has been accumulated in experiments on eight bivalents in eight cells. In control experiments these same bivalents reoriented from a unipolar orientation within 16 min, on the average, in the absence of tension. Controlled reorientation and chromosome segregation can be explained from the results of these and related experiments.     

Influence of autosome movements and of sex-chromosome movements on sex-chromosome segregation in crane fly spermatocytes

In crane fly spermatocyte meiosis 3 autosome half-bivalents normally move to each spindle pole in anaphase while the 2 amphitelic sex-chromosome univalents remain at the equator. The sex-chromosome univalents move to opposite poles after the autosomes reach the poles. — We used micromanipulation to detach half-bivalents in anaphase. When re-attached half-bivalents were syntelically oriented to the original pole, sex-chromosome segregation was usually not altered. When re-attached half-bivalents were amphitelically oriented, sex-chromosome segregation was usually altered: usually the amphitelic autosome segregated against one sex-chromosome while the other sex-chromosome remained at the equator. When re-attached half-bivalents were syntelically oriented to the opposite pole, sex-chromosome segregation was often altered: often one sex-chromosome moved normally to the spindle pole with 2 autosomal half-bivalents, while the other sex-chromosome did not move to the spindle pole with 4 autosomal half-bivalents, but remained at the equator. — The direction of motion of a sex-chromosome could be altered even after sex-chromosome segregation had begun, by suitable micromanipulation of the other sex-chromosome. — Amphitelic chromosomes that were not on the equator at the start of anaphase segregated predominantly to the closer spindle pole. Detached half-bivalents showed no preference for the closer pole when they re-attached with syntelic orientation. — We discuss some possible hypotheses for non-independent movements, and some implications of the results.     

Chromosome micromanipulation

The relationship of kinetochore orientation and reorientation to orderly chromosome distribution in anaphase has been studied experimentally by micromanipulation of living grasshopper spermatocytes. Bivalents or the X chromosome at prometaphase or metaphase I can be detached from the spindle with a microneedle and moved to any desired location within the cell. Following a pause of variable duration the detached chromosome invariably moved, kinetochores foremost, back to the spindle, reassumed its characteristic metaphase position, and, with one exception, segregated normally at anaphase I. Detachment from the spindle is demonstrated unequivocally (1) by manipulation evidence for the absence of the firm spindle connections seen both before detachment and after reattachment and (2) by a functional criterion: a given kinetochore, oriented to one pole before detachment, often orients to the opposite pole after detachment. The segregation in anaphase was always as expected from the final, post-operation, orientation. Reorientation and prometaphase and anaphase movement after detachment cannot be distinguished from their counterparts in control cells. Kinetochore position after detachment is the primary determinant of the pole to which that kinetochore will orient. Therefore, since the experimenter determines kinetochore position, he can cause any given half-bivalent to segregate to a predetermined pole at anaphase I. Similarly, orientation of both half-bivalents to the same pole can be induced. These mal-oriented bivalents invariably reorient and normal anaphase segregation ensues. Non-disjunction can, however, be produced directly in late anaphase. These experiments are based upon current views of orderly chromosome distribution; their success confirms our understanding of the fundamental orientation process.     

A comparative study of orientation at behavior of univalent in living grasshopper spermatocytes

Orientational movements and modes of segregation at anaphase I were analyzed in three different types of univalents in living spermatocytes of the grasshopper species Eyprepocnemis plorans, namely the sex univalent, three types of accessory chromosomes and spontaneous and induced autosomal univalents. When two or more univalents were present in the same spindle, their dynamics were directly compared. Chromosomes may show variable velocity and number of reorientations: the X and the most common B types (B₁ and B₂) are slow and rarely reorient, a more geographically restricted B (B₅) is faster and reorients more often, and autosomal univalents are the fastest and show the highest frequency of reorientations. Nonetheless, the X and the accessories are rigorously reductional at anaphase I whereas autosomal univalents often fail to migrate or divide equationally. This indicates that orientational and segregational behavior are controlled mainly by chromosomal rather than cellular characteristics and that chromosomes may display a great variety of strategies to achieve regular segregation.     

Relationship between the arrangement of microtubules and chromosome behaviour of syntelic autosomal univalents during prometaphase in crane fly spermatocytes

During meiotic prometaphase of crane fly spermatocytes, syntelic autosomal univalents are able to move between the spindle poles several times. The relationship between the behaviour of chromosomes and the arrangement of microtubules during this stage was studied using a fixation technique (Nicklas et al. 1979) which makes it possible to examine a certain cell in an electron microscope after live observation. After reorientation, when a syntelic univalent had started moving towards the opposite spindle pole, a short chromosome fibre was found. When a univalent had reached the equator, a chromosome fibre could be traced up to the spindle apex. During the movement towards the opposite spindle pole the degree of disorder in the chromosome fibre was high, whereas it was low in the fibre of a motionless univalent. The degree of disorder was determined by the relative proportion of skew fibre microtubules. At the beginning of reorientation a chromosome fibre was still present, but later, it was no longer possible to recognize such a fibre. Instead of a chromosome fibre, a bundle of microtubules laterally associated with the kinetochore was observed. Some microtubules of this bundle had a direct contact with the kinetochore. These observations strongly hint that the laterally associated microtubules have an important function in the reorientation of syntelic autosomal univalents.     

Orientation of nonrandomly segregating sex chromosomes in spermatocytes of the flea beetle, Alagoasa bicolor L.

In males of the flea beetle, Alagoasa bicolor L., spermatocytes have two achiasmate sex chromosomes, X and Y, each of which is approximately five times larger than the ten pairs of chiasmate autosomes. At metaphase I, these univalent sex chromosomes are located on a spindle domain separated from the autosomal spindle domain by a sheath of mitochondria. A single centriole pair is located at each pole of the spindle. In prometaphase I, each sex chromosome appears to maintain an attachment to both spindle poles via kinetochore microtubules (i.e., amphitelic orientation). Before anaphase I, this orientation changes to the syntelic orientation (both sister kinetochores connected to the same pole), perhaps by the release of microtubule attachments from the more distant pole by each of the chromosomes. The syntelic orientation just prior to anaphase I leaves each sex chromosome attached to the nearest pole via kinetochore microtubules, ensuring nonrandom segregation. As the sex chromosomes reorient, the autosomes follow in a sequential manner, starting with the bivalent closest to the sex spindle domain. We report here data that shed new light on the mechanism of this exceptional meiotic chromosome behavior.     

The induction of orientational instability and bivalent interlocking at meiosis

The administration of 40° C heat-treatments was found to induce bivalent orientational instability and interlocking at male meiosis in the locust Locusta migratoria. Only the longest members of the complement showed orientational instability and these usually possessed single distally sited chiasmata, with near-maximal intercentromeric distances. An effect on the stability of spindle fibre microtubule association, or attachment to the chromosome, is considered to be a possible explanation of the behaviour found. Bipolar orientation was generally achieved prior to anaphase I so that chromosome segregation was usually normal. Diamphitelic bivalents provided the most common exception to this rule. They sometimes lagged at anaphase, with the separation of half-bivalents and the production of structures indistinguishable from lagging univalents. The bivalent interlocking also involved the longest members of the complement. Most combinations of rod/rod, rod/ring and ring/ring types of interlocking were found. Usually only two bivalents were interlocked in any one cell, although occasionally three were found interlocked. All types appeared to involve an effect on the regulation of chromosome pairing, although at least one of the cells found showed interlocking caused by the metaphase orientational instability. In most cells, interlocked bivalents showed stable orientation and this usually involved the unipolar orientation of each bivalent's two centromeres. Such configurations provide concrete support for the importance of physical tension in the maintenance of metaphase orientational stability. They lead to double non-disjunction at anaphase I. Interlocked bivalents showed normal congression to a mid-equatorial position with no tendency for the re-adjustment of arm ratios to equalise centromere distances from the poles. This behaviour is discussed in relation to spindle fibre dynamics and it is concluded that no hypothesis of congression currently available can satisfactorily explain all that we know of the behaviour of univalents, bivalents, multivalents and interlocked bivalents.     

The non-random chromosome segregation in spermatocytes of Gryllotalpa hexadactyla

Males of Gryllotalpa hexadactyla have 22 autosomes and one X chromosome in their chromosome complement. One pair of autosomes forms a heteromorphic bivalent in meiosis: one dyad is several times the size of the other. At metaphase of the first meiotic division the large dyad and the X chromosome are invariably oriented to the same pole, and they move to this pole in anaphase. These earlier observations (Payne, White) have been confirmed by studies on living spermatocytes, and a preliminary experimental analysis by micromanipulation has been made. No physical connection between the X chromosome and the heteromorphic bivalent could be detected when either one was moved with a microneedle. When the X chromosome was detached from the spindle in prometaphase and brought to the other pole, it oriented to this pole, but it usually reoriented and moved back to the original pole. When the heteromorphic bivalent was detached from the spindle and its position inverted, the large and the small dyads oriented to the new poles. The heteromorph remained in inverted position but the X chromosome usually reoriented and moved to the pole to which the large dyad was now oriented. When the heteromorph was detached and taken out of the cell, the X chromosome reoriented and moved to the other pole, reoriented again and moved back to the original pole. When the X chromosome was detached and taken out of the cell the heteromorph did not show any reaction. It is concluded that the X chromosome's reorientation response is the critical factor in non-random segregation in Gryllotalpa.This investigation was supported in part by a research grant (GM 13745) from the division of General Medical Sciences, United States Public Health Service.     

Co-segregation of sex chromosomes in the male black widow spider <Emphasis Type="Italic">Latrodectus mactans</Emphasis> (Araneae,Theridiidae)

During meiosis I, homologous chromosomes join together to form bivalents. Through trial and error, bivalents achieve stable bipolar orientations (attachments) on the spindle that eventually allow the segregation of homologous chromosomes to opposite poles. Bipolar orientations are stable through tension generated by poleward forces to opposite poles. Unipolar orientations lack tension and are stereotypically not stable. The behavior of sex chromosomes during meiosis I in the male black widow spider Latrodectus mactans (Araneae, Theridiidae) challenges the principles governing such a scenario. We found that male L. mactans has two distinct X chromosomes, X₁ and X₂. The X chromosomes join together to form a connection that is present in prometaphase I but is lost during metaphase I, before the autosomes disjoin at anaphase I. We found that both X chromosomes form stable unipolar orientations to the same pole that assure their co-segregation at anaphase I. Using micromanipulation, immunofluorescence microscopy, and electron microscopy, we studied this unusual chromosome behavior to explain how it may fit the current dogma of chromosome distribution during cell division.     

Orientation and segregation of a micromanipulated multivalent: Familiar principles,divergent outcomes

We studied the orientation and segregation of a particular quadrivalent in living grasshopper spermatocytes. Quadrivalents were detached from the spindle by micromanipulation, then placed and bent as desired. The detached quadrivalents reattach and orient on the spindle. Their orientation is determined by the same principles that apply to ordinary chromosomes in mitosis and meiosis, but the outcome is different. Certain characteristics of the quadrivalent lead to a variety of orientations rather than the single one typical of ordinary chromosomes. Two kinetochores in the quadrivalent are linked to the others by unusually long, flexible chromosome arms. These kinetochores may face either the same pole or opposite poles and tend to orient initially to the pole toward which they face. Consequently, the initial orientation of the flexibly linked kinetochores is variable, and, moreover, they frequently reorient. In contrast, the other two kinetochores are as rigidly connected as those in a small bivalent and so display the typical back-to-back arrangement. Usually, this arrangement leads quickly to a stable orientation of the two kinetochores to opposite poles. Sometimes, however, the back-to-back arrangement changes to a side-by-side arrangement so that the orientation of both kinetochores to the same pole is favored. The combined effect of this diverse behavior is that the quadrivalent has four stable orientations, each leading to a different distribution of chromosomes in anaphase. The result is genetic chaos. Ironically, this chaos is produced by the same mechanisms that, in ordinary bivalents and mitotic chromosomes, produce a single stable orientation and genetically appropriate chromosome distribution.by P.B. Moens     

Oocyte-specific differences in cell-cycle control create an innate susceptibility to meiotic errors

Segregation of homologs at the first meiotic division (MI) is facilitated by crossovers and by a physical constraint imposed on sister kinetochores that facilitates monopolar attachment to the MI spindle. Recombination failure or premature separation of homologs results in univalent chromosomes at MI, and univalents constrained to form monopolar attachments should be inherently unstable and trigger the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). Although univalents trigger cell-cycle arrest in the male, this is not the case in mammalian oocytes. Because the spindle assembly portion of the SAC appears to function normally, two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the lack of response to univalents: (1) reduced stringency of the oocyte SAC to aberrant chromosome behavior, and (2) the ability of univalents to satisfy the SAC by forming bipolar attachments. The present study of Mlh1 mutant mice demonstrates that metaphase alignment is not a prerequisite for anaphase onset and provides strong evidence that MI spindle stabilization and anaphase onset require stable bipolar attachment of a critical mass--but not all--of chromosomes. We postulate that subtle differences in SAC-mediated control make the human oocyte inherently error prone and contribute to the age-related increase in aneuploidy.     

Tension,microtubule rearrangements,and the proper distribution of chromosomes in mitosis

The basis for stable versus unstable kinetochore orientation was investigated by a correlated living-cell/ultrastructural study of grasshopper spermatocytes. Mal-oriented bivalents having both kinetochores oriented to one spindle pole were induced by micromanipulation. Such malorientations are stable while the bivalent is subject to tension applied by micromanipulation but unstable after tension is released. Unstable bivalents always reorient with movement of one kinetochore toward the opposite pole. Microtubules associated with stably oriented bivalents, whether they are mal-oriented or in normal bipolar orientation, are arranged in orderly parallel bundles running from each kinetochore toward the pole. Similar orderly kinetochore microtubule arrangements characterize mal-oriented bivalents fixed just after release of tension. A significantly different microtubule arrangement is found only some time after tension release, when kinetochore movement is evident. The microtubules of a reorienting kinetochore always include a small number of microtubules running toward the pole toward which the kinetochore was moving at the time of fixation. All other microtubules associated with such a moving kinetochore appear to have lost their anchorage to the original pole and to be dragged passively as the kinetochore proceeds to the other pole. Thus, the stable anchorage of kinetochore microtubules to the spindle is associated with tension force and unstable anchorage with the absence of tension. The effect of tension is readily explained if force production and anchorage are both produced by mitotic motors, which link microtubules to the spindle as they generate tension forces.     

Involvement of chromatid cohesiveness at the centromere and chromosome arms in meiotic chromosome segregation: A cytological approach

Kinetochores and chromatid cores of meiotic chromosomes of the grasshopper species Arcyptera fusca and Eyprepocnemis plorans were differentially silver stained to analyse the possible involvement of both structures in chromatid cohesiveness and meiotic chromosome segregation. Special attention was paid to the behaviour of these structures in the univalent sex chromosome, and in B univalents with different orientations during the first meiotic division. It was observed that while sister chromatid of univalents are associated at metaphase I, chromatid cores are individualised independently of their orientation. We think that cohesive proteins on the inner surface of sister chromatids, and not the chromatid cores, are involved in the chromatid cohesiveness that maintains associated sister chromatids of bivalents and univalents until anaphase I. At anaphase I sister chromatids of amphitelically oriented B univalents or spontaneous autosomal univalents separate but do not reach the poles because they remain connected at the centromere by a long strand which can be visualized by silver staining, that joins stretched sister kinetochores. This strand is normally observed between sister kinetochores of half-bivalents at metaphase II and early anaphase II. We suggest that certain centromere proteins that form the silver-stainable strand assure chromosome integrity until metaphase II. These cohesive centromere proteins would be released or modified during anaphase II to allow normal chromatid segregation. Failure of this process during the first meiotic division could lead to the lagging of amphitelically oriented univalents. Based on our results we propose a model of meiotic chromosome segregation. During mitosis the cohesive proteins located at the centromere and chromosome arms are released during the same cellular division. During meiosis those proteins must be sequentially inactivated, i.e. those situated on the inner surface of the chromatids must be eliminated during the first meiotic division while those located at the centromere must be released during the second meiotic division.by D.P. Bazett-Jones     

The role of sister chromatid cohesiveness and structure in meiotic behaviour

Sister chromatid cores, kinetochores and the connecting strand between sister kinetochores were differentially silver stained to analyse the behaviour of these structures during meiosis in normal and two spontaneous desynaptic individuals of Chorthippus jucundus (Orthoptera). In these desynaptic individuals most of the chromosomes appear as univalents and orient equationally in the first meiotic division. Despite this abnormal segregation pattern, the changes in chromosome structure follow the same timing as in normal individuals and seem to be strictly phase dependent. Chromosomes in the first prometaphase have associated sister kinetochores and sister chromatid cores that lie in the chromosome midline; we propose that this promotes the initial monopolar orientation of chromosomes. However, the requirements of tension for stable attachment to the spindle force the autosomal univalents to acquire amphitelic orientation. Sister kinetochores behave in a chromosome orientation-dependent manner and, in the first metaphase, they appear to be interconnected by a strand that can be detected by silver impregnation, as seen in the second metaphase of wild-type individuals. The disappearance of the sister kinetochore-connecting strand, needed for equational chromatid segregation, however, can only take place in the second meiotic division. This connecting strand is ultimately responsible for the inability of chromosomes to segregate sister chromatids in the first anaphase. Received: 25 March 1997; in revised form: 14 July 1997 / Accepted: 22 August 1997     

Microtubules,chromosome movement,and reorientation after chromosomes are detached from the spindle by micromanipulation

The relationship between chromosome movement and mirotubules was explored by combining micromanipulation of living grasshopper spermatocytes with electron microscopy. We detached chromosomes from the spindle and placed them far out in the cytoplasm. Soon, the chromosomes began to move back toward the spindle and the cells were fixed at a chosen moment. The microtubules seen in three-dimensional reconstructions were correlated with the chromosome movement just prior to fixation. Before movement began, detached chromosomes had no kinetochore microtubules or a single one at most. Renewed movement was always accompanied by the reappearance of kinetochore microtubules; a single kinetochore microtubule appeared to suffice. Chromosome movements and kinetochore microtubule arrangements were unusual after reattachment, but their relationship was not: poleward forces, parallel to the kinetochore microtubule axis (as in normal anaphase), would explain the movement, however odd. The initial arrangement of kinetochore microtubules would have led to aberrant chromosome distribution if it persisted, but instead, reorientation to the appropriate arrangement always followed. Observations on living cells permitted us to place in sequence the kinetochore microtubule arrangements seen in fixed cells, revealing the microtubule transformations during reorientation. From the sequence of events we conclude that chromosome movement can cause reorientation to begin and that in the changes which follow, an unstable attachment of kinetochore microtubules to the spindle plays a major role.     

“Bouquet arrest”, monopolar chromosomes segregation, and correction of the abnormal spindle

According to our data, the arrest of univalents in bouquet arrangement is a widespread meiotic feature in cereal haploids and allohaploids (wide hybrids F₁). We have analyzed 83 different genotypes of cereal haploids and allohaploids with visualization of the cytoskeleton and found a bouquet arrest in 45 of them (in 30% to 100% pollen mother cells (PMCs)). The meiotic plant cell division in 26 various genotypes with a zygotene bouquet arrest was analyzed in detail. In three of them in PMCs, a very specific monopolar conic-shaped figure at early prometaphase is formed. This monopolar figure consists of mono-oriented univalents and their kinetochore fibers converging in pointed pole. Such figures are never observed at wild-type prometaphase or in asynaptic meiosis in the variants without a bouquet arrest. Later at prometaphase, the bipolar central spindle fibers join in this monopolar figure, and a bipolar spindle with all univalents connected to one pole is formed. As a result of monopolar chromosome segregation at anaphase and normal cytokinesis at telophase, a dyad with one member carrying a restitution nucleus and the other enucleated is formed. However, such phenotype has only three genotypes among 26 analyzed with a bouquet arrest. In the remaining 23 haploids and allohaploids, the course of prometaphase was altered after the conic monopolar figure formation. In these variants, the completely formed conic monopolar figure was disintegrated into a chaotic network of spindle fibers and univalents acquired a random orientation. This arrangement looks like a mid-prometaphase in the wild-type meiosis. At late prometaphase, a bipolar spindle is formed with the univalents distributed more or less equally between two poles, similar to the phenotypes without a bouquet arrest. The product of cell division is a dyad with aneuploid members. Thus, the spindle abnormality—monopolar chromosome orientation—is corrected. In some cells the correction of the prometaphase monopolus occurs by means of its splitting into two half-spindles and their rotation along the future division axis.     

Oogenesis: when most is good enough

In male meiosis an unaligned chromosome blocks meiotic progression. However, oocytes with one or more misaligned chromosomes can complete meiosis. This difference reflects a more permissive role of the spindle assembly checkpoint, rather than solely reflecting the ability of some univalents to adopt a meiosis II-like orientation on the spindle.     

Chromosome micromanipulation

Two types of unusual motion within the spindle have heen studied in a grasshopper (Melanoplus differentialis) spermatocyte. The first is the motion of granules placed by micromanipulation within the normally granule-free spindle. The most specific motions are poleward, approximate the speed of the chromosomes in anaphase, and occur in the area between the kinetochores and the nearer pole during both metaphase and anaphase. Exactly the same transport properties were earlier observed by Bajer inHaemanthus endosperm spindles. The absence of significant motion in the interzone between the separating chromosomes at anaphase has been unequivocally demonstrated inMelanoplus spermatocytes. Thus very specific motion of non-kinetochoric materials is probably a general spindle capability which would much restrict admissible models of mitotic force production,if the same forces move both granules and chromosomes. The second unusual motion is seen following chromosome detachment from the spindle by micromanipulation during anaphase. These tend to move toNearer pole rather than to the pole the chromosome's kinetochoresFace. The latter preference was earlier demonstrated after detachment during prometaphase or metaphase and has been confirmed without exception in the present studies. The apparent preference for motion to the nearer pole in anaphase provides the first evidence for poleward forces within each half-spindle which cannot be entirely specified by the chromosomal spindle fibers. Almost certainly these would be the usual forces responsible for chromosome motion since they act specifically at the kinetochores of detached chromosomes. This evidence requires interpretation, however because additional factors influence chromosome motion following detachment at anaphase. On thesimplest interpretation, certain current models of mitosis clearly are not satisfactory and others are favored.     

Meiosis in a triploid hybrid of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Gossypium</Emphasis>: high frequency of secondary bipolar spindles at metaphase II

Studies on meiosis in pollen mother cells (PMCs) of a triploid interspecific hybrid (3x = 39 chromosomes, AAD) between tetraploid Gossypium hirsutum (4n = 2x = 52,AADD) and diploid G. arboreum (2n = 2x = 26,AA) are reported. During meiotic metaphase I, 13 AA bivalents and 13 D univalents are expected in the hybrid. However, only 28% of the PMCs had this expected configuration. The rest of the PMCs had between 8 and 12 bivalents and between 12 and 17 univalents. Univalents lagged at anaphase I, and at metaphase II one or a group of univalents remained scattered in the cytoplasm and failed to assemble at a single metaphase plate. Primary bipolar spindles organized around the bivalents and multivalents. In addition to the primary spindle, several secondary and smaller bipolar spindles organized themselves around individual univalents and groups of univalents. Almost all (97%) of the PMCs showed secondary spindles. Each spindle functioned independently and despite their multiple numbers in a cell, meiosis I proceeded normally, with polyad formation. These observations strongly support the view that in plant meiocytes bilateral kinetochore symmetry is not required for establishing a bipolar spindle and that single unpaired chromosomes can initiate and stabilize the formation of a functional bipolar spindle.