Spatial specification of mammalian eye territories by reciprocal transcriptional repression of Pax2 and Pax6

We have studied the molecular basis of the Pax2 and Pax6 function in the establishment of visual system territories. Loss-of-function mutants have revealed crucial roles for Pax2 in the generation of the optic stalk and for Pax6 in the development of the optic cup. Ectopic expression of Pax6 in the optic stalk under control of Pax2 promoter elements resulted in a shift of the optic cup/optic stalk boundary indicated by the presence of retinal pigmented cells on the optic stalk. By studying mouse embryos at early developmental stages we detected an expansion of Pax2 expression domain in the Pax6(-/-) mutant and of Pax6 expression domain in the Pax2(-/-) embryo. These results suggest that the position of the optic cup/optic stalk boundary depends on Pax2 and Pax6 expression, hinting at a possible molecular interaction. Using gel shift experiments, we confirmed the presence of Pax2- and Pax6-binding sites on the retina enhancer of the Pax6 gene and on the Pax2 upstream control region, respectively. Co-transfection experiments revealed a reciprocal inhibition of Pax2 promoter/enhancer activity by Pax6 protein and vice versa. Based on our findings, we propose a model for Pax gene regulation that establishes the proper spatial regionalization of the mammalian visual system.     

Pigmented epithelium to retinal transdifferentiation and Pax6 expression in larval Xenopus laevis

This study examines the retinal transdifferentiation (TD) of retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) fragments dissected from Xenopus laevis larvae and implanted into the vitreous chamber of non-lentectomized host eyes. In these experimental conditions, most RPE implants transformed into polarized vesicles in which the side adjacent to the lens maintained the RPE phenotype, while the side adjacent to the host retina transformed into a laminar retina with the photoreceptor layer facing the cavity of the vesicle and with the ganglionar cell layer facing the host retina. The formation of a new retina with a laminar organization is the result of depigmentation, proliferation and differentiation of progenitor cells under the influence of inductive factors from the host retina. The phases of the TD process were followed using BrdU labelling as a marker of the proliferation phase and using a monoclonal antibody (mAbHP1) as a definitive indicator of retina formation. Pigmented RPE cells do not express Pax6. In the early phase of RPE to retinal TD, all depigmented and proliferating progenitor cells expressed Pax6. Changes in the Pax6 expression pattern became apparent in the early phase of differentiation, when Pax6 expression decreased in the presumptive outer nuclear layer (ONL) of the new-forming retina. Finally, during the late differentiation phase, the ONL, which contains photoreceptors, no longer expressed Pax6, Pax6 expression being confined to the ganglion cell layer and the inner nuclear layer. These results indicate that Pax6 may have different roles during the different phases of RPE to retinal TD, acting as an early retinal determinant and later directing progenitor cell fate.     

The orchestration of mammalian tissue morphogenesis through a series of coherent feed-forward loops

Tissue morphogenesis requires intricate temporal and spatial control of gene expression that is executed through specific gene regulatory networks (GRNs). GRNs are comprised from individual subcircuits of different levels of complexity. An important question is to elucidate the mutual relationship between those genes encoding DNA-binding factors that trigger the subcircuit with those that play major "later" roles during terminal differentiation via expression of specific genes that constitute the phenotype of individual tissues. The ocular lens is a classical model system to study tissue morphogenesis. Pax6 is essential for both lens placode formation and subsequent stages of lens morphogenesis, whereas c-Maf controls terminal differentiation of lens fibers, including regulation of crystallins, key lens structural proteins required for its transparency and refraction. Here, we show that Pax6 directly regulates c-Maf expression during lens development. A 1.3-kb c-Maf promoter with a 1.6-kb upstream enhancer (CR1) recapitulated the endogenous c-Maf expression pattern in lens and retinal pigmented epithelium. ChIP assays revealed binding of Pax6 and c-Maf to multiple regions of the c-Maf locus in lens chromatin. To predict functional Pax6-binding sites, nine novel variants of Pax6 DNA-binding motifs were identified and characterized. Two of these motifs predicted a pair of Pax6-binding sites in the CR1. Mutagenesis of these Pax6-binding sites inactivated transgenic expression in the lens but not in retinal pigmented epithelium. These data establish a novel regulatory role for Pax6 during lens development, link together the Pax6/c-Maf/crystallin regulatory network, and suggest a novel type of GRN subcircuit that controls a major part of embryonic lens development.     

Notch signaling reveals developmental plasticity of Pax4(+) pancreatic endocrine progenitors and shunts them to a duct fate

Relatively little is known about the developmental signals that specify the types and numbers of pancreatic cells. Previous studies suggested that Notch signaling in the pancreas inhibits differentiation and promotes the maintenance of progenitor cells, but it remains unclear whether Notch also controls cell fate choices as it does in other tissues. To study the impact of Notch in progenitors of the beta cell lineage, we generated mice that express Cre-recombinase under control of the Pax4 promoter. Lineage analysis of Pax4(+) cells demonstrates they are specified endocrine progenitors that contribute equally to four islet cell fates, contrary to expectations raised by the dispensable role of Pax4 in the specification of the alpha and PP subtypes. In addition, we show that activation of Notch in Pax4(+) progenitors inhibits their differentiation into alpha and beta endocrine cells and shunts them instead toward a duct fate. These observations reveal an unappreciated degree of developmental plasticity among early endocrine progenitors and raise the possibility that a bipotent duct-endocrine progenitor exists during development. Furthermore, the redirection of Pax4(+) cells from alpha and beta endocrine fates toward a duct cell type suggests a positive role for Notch signaling in duct specification and is consistent with the more widely defined role for Notch in cell fate determination.