Assessing the role of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored high density lipoprotein-binding protein 1 (GPIHBP1) three-finger domain in binding lipoprotein lipase

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored high density lipoprotein-binding protein 1 (GPIHBP1) is an endothelial cell protein that transports lipoprotein lipase (LPL) from the subendothelial spaces to the capillary lumen. GPIHBP1 contains two main structural motifs, an amino-terminal acidic domain enriched in aspartates and glutamates and a lymphocyte antigen 6 (Ly6) motif containing 10 cysteines. All of the cysteines in the Ly6 domain are disulfide-bonded, causing the protein to assume a three-fingered structure. The acidic domain of GPIHBP1 is known to be important for LPL binding, but the involvement of the Ly6 domain in LPL binding requires further study. To assess the importance of the Ly6 domain, we created a series of GPIHBP1 mutants in which each residue of the Ly6 domain was changed to alanine. The mutant proteins were expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, and their expression level on the cell surface and their ability to bind LPL were assessed with an immunofluorescence microscopy assay and a Western blot assay. We identified 12 amino acids within GPIHBP1, aside from the conserved cysteines, that are important for LPL binding; nine of those were clustered in finger 2 of the GPIHBP1 three-fingered motif. The defective GPIHBP1 proteins also lacked the ability to transport LPL from the basolateral to the apical surface of endothelial cells. Our studies demonstrate that the Ly6 domain of GPIHBP1 is important for the ability of GPIHBP1 to bind and transport LPL.     

The acidic domain of GPIHBP1 is important for the binding of lipoprotein lipase and chylomicrons

GPIHBP1, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored endothelial cell protein of the lymphocyte antigen 6 (Ly6) family, plays a key role in the lipolysis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (e.g. chylomicrons). GPIHBP1 is expressed along the luminal surface of endothelial cells of heart, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue, and GPIHBP1-expressing cells bind lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and chylomicrons avidly. GPIHBP1 contains an amino-terminal acidic domain (amino acids 24-48) that is enriched in aspartate and glutamate residues, and we previously speculated that this domain might be important in binding ligands. To explore the functional importance of the acidic domain, we tested the ability of polyaspartate or polyglutamate peptides to block the binding of ligands to pgsA-745 Chinese hamster ovary cells that overexpress GPIHBP1. Both polyaspartate and polyglutamate blocked LPL and chylomicron binding to GPIHBP1. Also, a rabbit antiserum against the acidic domain of GPIHBP1 blocked LPL and chylomicron binding to GPIHBP1-expressing cells. Replacing the acidic amino acids within GPIHBP1 residues 38-48 with alanine eliminated the ability of GPIHBP1 to bind LPL and chylomicrons. Finally, mutation of the positively charged heparin-binding domains within LPL and apolipoprotein AV abolished the ability of these proteins to bind to GPIHBP1. These studies indicate that the acidic domain of GPIHBP1 is important and that electrostatic interactions play a key role in ligand binding.     

Highly Conserved Cysteines within the Ly6 Domain of GPIHBP1 Are Crucial for the Binding of Lipoprotein Lipase

GPIHBP1, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored endothelial cell protein of the lymphocyte antigen 6 (Ly6) family, binds lipoprotein lipase (LPL) avidly and is required for the lipolytic processing of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. GPIHBP1 contains two key structural motifs, an acidic domain and an Ly6 motif (a three-fingered domain specified by 10 cysteines). The acidic domain is required for LPL binding, but the importance of the Ly6 domain is less clear. To explore that issue, we transfected cells with a wild-type GPIHBP1 expression vector or mutant GPIHBP1 vectors in which specific cysteines in the Ly6 domain were changed to alanine. The mutant GPIHBP1 proteins reached the cell surface, as judged by antibody binding studies and by the ability of a phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C to release these proteins from the cell surface. However, cells expressing the cysteine mutants could not bind LPL. The acidic domain of the cysteine mutants appeared to remain accessible, as judged by binding studies with an antibody against the acidic domain. We also developed a cell-free assay of LPL binding. We created a rat monoclonal antibody against the carboxyl terminus of mouse GPIHBP1 and used that antibody to coat agarose beads. We then tested the ability of soluble forms of GPIHBP1 that had been immobilized on monoclonal antibody-coated beads to bind LPL. In this assay, wild-type soluble GPIHBP1 bound LPL avidly, but the cysteine mutants did not. Thus, our studies suggest that a structurally intact Ly6 domain (in addition to the acidic domain) is essential for LPL binding.Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored high density lipoprotein-binding protein 1 (GPIHBP1)² is an endothelial cell protein that is required for the lipolytic processing of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in the plasma (1). In the absence of GPIHBP1, lipolysis of plasma lipoproteins is virtually abolished, leading to severe hypertriglyceridemia (1). Expression of GPIHBP1 in cultured cells confers the ability to bind lipoprotein lipase (LPL) (1). That finding, along with the fact that GPIHBP1 is located in endothelial cells, led Beigneux et al. (1) to hypothesize that GPIHBP1 serves as an endothelial cell platform for lipolysis.The discovery of the role of GPIHBP1 in lipolysis prompted interest in defining which portions of GPIHBP1 are important for its function (e.g. for its ability to bind LPL). Mature GPIHBP1 is a relatively short protein with only two noteworthy structural domains (Fig. 1). First, the amino terminus of the protein contains a strongly acidic domain (amino acids 24–48 in the mouse sequence) with a large number of aspartates and glutamates (2). This negatively charged domain is absolutely critical for binding LPL, a protein that contains two well characterized positively charged “heparin-binding domains” (3–5). Second, GPIHBP1 contains a cysteine-rich Ly6 domain (amino acids 63–135 in the mouse sequence). The function of the Ly6 domain in LPL binding is less clearly defined.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Schematic of human GPIHBP1, showing the location of the acidic domain and the 10 highly conserved cysteines of the Ly6 domain. The location of Gln¹¹⁵ is also shown; a Q115P mutation was identified in association with chylomicronemia in a young man (15). This figure is modified, with permission, from a figure published in Ref. 22.The Ly6 domain is an ancient motif containing either 8 or 10 cysteines that are organized in a highly characteristic spacing pattern (6, 7). Mammalian genomes contain ∼25–30 Ly6 proteins, of which the best studied are urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor and CD59. In those proteins, as well as in other Ly6 proteins, crystallographic studies have shown that each of the cysteines is involved in a disulfide bond, producing a three-fingered structural motif (8–10).In the case of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor and CD59, the Ly6 motif is crucial for ligand binding (8–13). But in the case of GPIHBP1, one could argue that this domain might be dispensable, simply because it is plausible that the acidic domain would be sufficient for binding the positively charged domains within LPL. On the other hand, other considerations suggest that the GPIHBP1 Ly6 domain might actually be important for GPIHBP1 function. First, the cysteines that define the Ly6 domain are perfectly conserved in the GPIHBP1 of every mammalian species from platypus to human, suggesting that the three-fingered structure of this domain is important (14). Second, Beigneux et al. (15) found that a missense mutation adjacent to a conserved cysteine (Q115P) impaired the ability of GPIHBP1 to bind LPL. The latter observation led us to entertain the possibility that the Ly6 domain could be functionally important in LPL binding.To explore the functional relevance of the GPIHBP1 Ly6 domain, we decided to mutate the highly conserved cysteines in GPIHBP1 (Fig. 1), because those mutations would be predicted to disrupt the structure of the three-fingered motif. For other Ly6 proteins, mutation of conserved cysteines appears to impair protein function. Mutation of several (but not all) of the Ly6 cysteines in CD59 reduces the ability of that molecule to inhibit complement-mediated membrane attack (13). Also, missense mutations involving cysteines were found in a secreted Ly6 protein, SLURP1, in association with a recessive palmoplantar keratoderma (16). Unfortunately, the function and the binding partner for SLURP1 are unknown, so no one has been able to use biochemical assays to rigorously assess the impact of cysteine mutations on protein function. In contrast, GPIHBP1 has a well established function—binding LPL, and a cell-based system for assessing LPL binding has been developed (1, 15, 17).In the current study, we sought to assess the impact of Ly6 cysteine mutations on the LPL binding capacity of GPIHBP1. But as we embarked on these studies, we worried that the cell-based assay system might be inadequate, for the simple reason that cysteine mutations sometimes interfere with the ability of proteins to reach the cell surface (13, 18). Accordingly, we also developed a cell-free, monoclonal antibody-based assay system for assessing the ability of GPIHBP1 to bind LPL. Both the cell-based binding system and the cell-free system were used to test the possibility that the Ly6 domain of GPIHBP1, like the acidic domain, is critical for binding LPL.     

Multimerization of Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored High Density Lipoprotein-binding Protein 1 (GPIHBP1) and Familial Chylomicronemia from a Serine-to-Cysteine Substitution in GPIHBP1 Ly6 Domain

GPIHBP1, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored glycoprotein of microvascular endothelial cells, binds lipoprotein lipase (LPL) within the interstitial spaces and transports it across endothelial cells to the capillary lumen. The ability of GPIHBP1 to bind LPL depends on the Ly6 domain, a three-fingered structure containing 10 cysteines and a conserved pattern of disulfide bond formation. Here, we report a patient with severe hypertriglyceridemia who was homozygous for a GPIHBP1 point mutation that converted a serine in the GPIHBP1 Ly6 domain (Ser-107) to a cysteine. Two hypertriglyceridemic siblings were homozygous for the same mutation. All three homozygotes had very low levels of LPL in the preheparin plasma. We suspected that the extra cysteine in GPIHBP1-S107C might prevent the trafficking of the protein to the cell surface, but this was not the case. However, nearly all of the GPIHBP1-S107C on the cell surface was in the form of disulfide-linked dimers and multimers, whereas wild-type GPIHBP1 was predominantly monomeric. An insect cell GPIHBP1 expression system confirmed the propensity of GPIHBP1-S107C to form disulfide-linked dimers and to form multimers. Functional studies showed that only GPIHBP1 monomers bind LPL. In keeping with that finding, there was no binding of LPL to GPIHBP1-S107C in either cell-based or cell-free binding assays. We conclude that an extra cysteine in the GPIHBP1 Ly6 motif results in multimerization of GPIHBP1, defective LPL binding, and severe hypertriglyceridemia.     

Angiopoietin-like 4 Modifies the Interactions between Lipoprotein Lipase and Its Endothelial Cell Transporter GPIHBP1

The release of fatty acids from plasma triglycerides for tissue uptake is critically dependent on the enzyme lipoprotein lipase (LPL). Hydrolysis of plasma triglycerides by LPL can be disrupted by the protein angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4), and ANGPTL4 has been shown to inactivate LPL in vitro. However, in vivo LPL is often complexed to glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored high density lipoprotein-binding protein 1 (GPIHBP1) on the surface of capillary endothelial cells. GPIHBP1 is responsible for trafficking LPL across capillary endothelial cells and anchors LPL to the capillary wall during lipolysis. How ANGPTL4 interacts with LPL in this context is not known. In this study, we investigated the interactions of ANGPTL4 with LPL-GPIHBP1 complexes on the surface of endothelial cells. We show that ANGPTL4 was capable of binding and inactivating LPL complexed to GPIHBP1 on the surface of endothelial cells. Once inactivated, LPL dissociated from GPIHBP1. We also show that ANGPTL4-inactivated LPL was incapable of binding GPIHBP1. ANGPTL4 was capable of binding, but not inactivating, LPL at 4 °C, suggesting that binding alone was not sufficient for ANGPTL4''s inhibitory activity. We observed that although the N-terminal coiled-coil domain of ANGPTL4 by itself and full-length ANGPTL4 both bound with similar affinities to LPL, the N-terminal fragment was more potent in inactivating both free and GPIHBP1-bound LPL. These results led us to conclude that ANGPTL4 can both bind and inactivate LPL complexed to GPIHBP1 and that inactivation of LPL by ANGPTL4 greatly reduces the affinity of LPL for GPIHBP1.     

Glycosylation of Asn-76 in mouse GPIHBP1 is critical for its appearance on the cell surface and the binding of chylomicrons and lipoprotein lipase

GPIHBP1 is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein in the lymphocyte antigen 6 (Ly-6) family that recently was identified as a platform for the lipolytic processing of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. GPIHBP1 binds both LPL and chylomicrons and is expressed on the luminal face of microvascular endothelial cells. Here, we show that mouse GPIHBP1 is N-glycosylated at Asn-76 within the Ly-6 domain. Human GPIHBP1 is also glycosylated. The N-linked glycan could be released from mouse GPIHBP1 with N-glycosidase F, endoglycosidase H, or endoglycosidase F1. The glycan was marginally sensitive to endoglycosidase F2 digestion but resistant to endoglycosidase F3 digestion, suggesting that the glycan on GPIHBP1 is of the oligomannose type. Mutating the N-glycosylation site in mouse GPIHBP1 results in an accumulation of GPIHBP1 in the endoplasmic reticulum and a markedly reduced amount of the protein on the cell surface. Consistent with this finding, cells expressing a nonglycosylated GPIHBP1 lack the ability to bind LPL or chylomicrons. Eliminating the N-glycosylation site in a truncated soluble version of GPIHBP1 causes a modest reduction in the secretion of the protein. These studies demonstrate that N-glycosylation of GPIHBP1 is important for the trafficking of GPIHBP1 to the cell surface.     

GPIHBP1, an endothelial cell transporter for lipoprotein lipase

Interest in lipolysis and the metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins was recently reignited by the discovery of severe hypertriglyceridemia (chylomicronemia) in glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored high density lipoprotein-binding protein 1 (GPIHBP1)-deficient mice. GPIHBP1 is expressed exclusively in capillary endothelial cells and binds lipoprotein lipase (LPL) avidly. These findings prompted speculation that GPIHBP1 serves as a binding site for LPL in the capillary lumen, creating "a platform for lipolysis." More recent studies have identified a second and more intriguing role for GPIHBP1-picking up LPL in the subendothelial spaces and transporting it across endothelial cells to the capillary lumen. Here, we review the studies that revealed that GPIHBP1 is the LPL transporter and discuss which amino acid sequences are required for GPIHBP1-LPL interactions. We also discuss the human genetics of LPL transport, focusing on cases of chylomicronemia caused by GPIHBP1 mutations that abolish GPIHBP1's ability to bind LPL, and LPL mutations that prevent LPL binding to GPIHBP1.     

Abnormal patterns of lipoprotein lipase release into the plasma in GPIHBP1-deficient mice

GPIHBP1-deficient mice (Gpihbp1(-/-)) exhibit severe chylomicronemia. GPIHBP1 is located within capillaries of muscle and adipose tissue, and expression of GPIHBP1 in Chinese hamster ovary cells confers upon those cells the ability to bind lipoprotein lipase (LPL). However, there has been absolutely no evidence that GPIHBP1 actually interacts with LPL in vivo. Heparin is known to release LPL from its in vivo binding sites, allowing it to enter the plasma. After an injection of heparin, we reasoned that LPL bound to GPIHBP1 in capillaries would be released very quickly, and we hypothesized that the kinetics of LPL entry into the plasma would differ in Gpihbp1(-/-) and control mice. Indeed, plasma LPL levels peaked very rapidly (within 1 min) after heparin in control mice. In contrast, plasma LPL levels in Gpihbp1(-/-) mice were much lower 1 min after heparin and increased slowly over 15 min. In keeping with that result, plasma triglycerides fell sharply within 10 min after heparin in wild-type mice, but were negligibly altered in the first 15 min after heparin in Gpihbp1(-/-) mice. Also, an injection of Intralipid released LPL into the plasma of wild-type mice but was ineffective in releasing LPL in Gpihbp1(-/-) mice. The observed differences in LPL release cannot be ascribed to different tissue stores of LPL, as LPL mass levels in tissues were similar in Gpihbp1(-/-) and control mice. The differences in LPL release after intravenous heparin and Intralipid strongly suggest that GPIHBP1 represents an important binding site for LPL in vivo.     

Assessing mechanisms of GPIHBP1 and lipoprotein lipase movement across endothelial cells

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is secreted into the interstitial spaces by adipocytes and myocytes but then must be transported to the capillary lumen by GPIHBP1, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein of capillary endothelial cells. The mechanism by which GPIHBP1 and LPL move across endothelial cells remains unclear. We asked whether the transport of GPIHBP1 and LPL across endothelial cells was uni- or bidirectional. We also asked whether GPIHBP1 and LPL are transported across cells in vesicles and whether this transport process requires caveolin-1. The movement of GPIHBP1 and LPL across cultured endothelial cells was bidirectional. Also, GPIHBP1 moved bidirectionally across capillary endothelial cells in live mice. The transport of LPL across endothelial cells was inhibited by dynasore and genistein, consistent with a vesicular transport process. Also, transmission electron microscopy (EM) and dual-axis EM tomography revealed GPIHBP1 and LPL in invaginations of the plasma membrane and in vesicles. The movement of GPIHBP1 across capillary endothelial cells was efficient in the absence of caveolin-1, and there was no defect in the internalization of LPL by caveolin-1-deficient endothelial cells in culture. Our studies show that GPIHBP1 and LPL move bidirectionally across endothelial cells in vesicles and that transport is efficient even when caveolin-1 is absent.     

Equivalent binding of wild-type lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and S447X-LPL to GPIHBP1, the endothelial cell LPL transporter

The S447X polymorphism in lipoprotein lipase (LPL), which shortens LPL by two amino acids, is associated with low plasma triglyceride levels and reduced risk for coronary heart disease. S447X carriers have higher LPL levels in the pre- and post-heparin plasma, raising the possibility that the S447X polymorphism leads to higher LPL levels within capillaries. One potential explanation for increased amounts of LPL in capillaries would be more avid binding of S447X-LPL to GPIHBP1 (the protein that binds LPL dimers and shuttles them to the capillary lumen). This explanation seems plausible because sequences within the carboxyl terminus of LPL are known to mediate LPL binding to GPIHBP1. To assess the impact of the S447X polymorphism on LPL binding to GPIHBP1, we compared the ability of internally tagged versions of wild-type LPL (WT-LPL) and S447X-LPL to bind to GPIHBP1 in both cell-based and cell-free binding assays. In the cell-based assay, we compared the binding of WT-LPL and S447X-LPL to GPIHBP1 on the surface of cultured cells. This assay revealed no differences in the binding of WT-LPL and S447X-LPL to GPIHBP1. In the cell-free assay, we compared the binding of internally tagged WT-LPL and S447X-LPL to soluble GPIHBP1 immobilized on agarose beads. Again, no differences in the binding of WT-LPL and S447X-LPL to GPIHBP1 were observed. We conclude that increased binding of S447X-LPL to GPIHBP1 is unlikely to be the explanation for more efficient lipolysis and lower plasma triglyceride levels in S447X carriers.     

A new monoclonal antibody, 4-1a,that binds to the amino terminus of human lipoprotein lipase

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) has been highly conserved through vertebrate evolution, making it challenging to generate useful antibodies. Some polyclonal antibodies against LPL have turned out to be nonspecific, and the available monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) against LPL, all of which bind to LPL's carboxyl terminus, have drawbacks for some purposes. We report a new LPL-specific monoclonal antibody, Mab 4-1a, which binds to the amino terminus of LPL (residues 5–25). Mab 4-1a binds human and bovine LPL avidly; it does not inhibit LPL catalytic activity nor does it interfere with the binding of LPL to heparin. Mab 4-1a does not bind to human hepatic lipase. Mab 4-1a binds to GPIHBP1-bound LPL and does not interfere with the ability of the LPL–GPIHBP1 complex to bind triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Mab 4-1a will be a useful reagent for both biochemists and clinical laboratories.     

Different roles of P1 and P2 Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal stalk proteins revealed by cross-linking

The stalk is an essential domain of the large ribosomal subunit formed by a complex of a set of very acidic proteins bound to a core rRNA binding component. While in prokaryotes there is only one type acidic protein, L7/12, two protein families are found in eukaryotes, phosphoproteins P1 and P2, which presumably have different roles. To search for differences zero-length cross-linking by S-S bridge formation was applied using Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant P1 and P2 proteins carrying single cysteine residues at various positions. The results show a more exposed location of the N-terminal domain of the P2 proteins, which in contrast to P1, can be found as dimers when the Cys is introduced in this domain. Similarly, the Cys containing C-terminal domain of mutant P2 proteins shows a notable capacity to form cross-links with other proteins, which is considerably lower in the P1 type. On the other hand, mutation at the conserved C-domain of protein P0, the eukaryotic stalk rRNA binding component, results in removal of about 14 terminal amino acids. Protein P2, but not P1, protects mutant P0 from this truncation. These results support a eukaryotic stalk structure in which P1 proteins are internally located with their C-terminals having a restricted reactivity while P2 proteins are more external and accessible to interact with other cellular components.     

GPIHBP1 stabilizes lipoprotein lipase and prevents its inhibition by angiopoietin-like 3 and angiopoietin-like 4

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored HDL-binding protein (GPIHBP1) binds both LPL and chylomicrons, suggesting that GPIHBP1 is a platform for LPL-dependent processing of triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins. Here, we investigated whether GPIHBP1 affects LPL activity in the absence and presence of LPL inhibitors angiopoietin-like (ANGPTL)3 and ANGPTL4. Like heparin, GPIHBP1 stabilized but did not activate LPL. ANGPTL4 potently inhibited nonstabilized LPL as well as heparin-stabilized LPL but not GPIHBP1-stabilized LPL. Like ANGPTL4, ANGPTL3 inhibited nonstabilized LPL but not GPIHBP1-stabilized LPL. ANGPTL3 also inhibited heparin-stabilized LPL but with less potency than nonstabilized LPL. Consistent with these in vitro findings, fasting serum TGs of Angptl4^−/−/Gpihbp1^−/− mice were lower than those of Gpihbp1^−/− mice and approached those of wild-type littermates. In contrast, serum TGs of Angptl3^−/−/Gpihbp1^−/− mice were only slightly lower than those of Gpihbp1^−/− mice. Treating Gpihbp1^−/− mice with ANGPTL4- or ANGPTL3-neutralizing antibodies recapitulated the double knockout phenotypes. These data suggest that GPIHBP1 functions as an LPL stabilizer. Moreover, therapeutic agents that prevent LPL inhibition by ANGPTL4 or, to a lesser extent, ANGPTL3, may benefit individuals with hyperlipidemia caused by gene mutations associated with decreased LPL stability.     

The N-terminal epidermal growth factor-like domain in factor IX and factor X represents an important recognition motif for binding to tissue factor.

Factors VII, IX, and X play key roles in blood coagulation. Each protein contains an N-terminal gamma-carboxyglutamic acid domain, followed by EGF1 and EGF2 domains, and the C-terminal serine protease domain. Protein C has similar domain structure and functions as an anticoagulant. During physiologic clotting, the factor VIIa-tissue factor (FVIIa*TF) complex activates both factor IX (FIX) and factor X (FX). FVIIa represents the enzyme, and TF represents the membrane-bound cofactor for this reaction. The substrates FIX and FX may utilize multiple domains in binding to the FVIIa*TF complex. To investigate the role of the EGF1 domain in this context, we expressed wild type FIX (FIX(WT)), FIX(Q50P), FIX(PCEGF1) (EGF1 domain replaced with that of protein C), FIX(DeltaEGF1) (EGF1 domain deleted), FX(WT), and FX(PCEGF1). Complexes of FVIIa with TF as well as with soluble TF (sTF) lacking the transmembrane region were prepared, and activations of WT and mutant proteins were monitored by SDS-PAGE and by enzyme assays. FVIIa*TF or FVIIa*sTF activated each mutant significantly more slowly than the FIX(WT) or FX(WT). Importantly, in ligand blot assays, FIX(WT) and FX(WT) bound to sTF, whereas mutants did not; however, all mutants and WT proteins bound to FVIIa. Further experiments revealed that the affinity of the mutants for sTF was reduced 3-10-fold and that the synthetic EGF1 domain (of FIX) inhibited FIX binding to sTF with K(i) of approximately 60 microm. Notably, each FIXa or FXa mutant activated FVII and bound to antithrombin, normally indicating correct folding of each protein. In additional experiments, FIXa with or without FVIIIa activated FX(WT) and FX(PCEGF1) normally, which is interpreted to mean that the EGF1 domain of FX does not play a significant role in its interaction with FVIIIa. Cumulatively, our data reveal that substrates FIX and FX in addition to interacting with FVIIa (enzyme) interact with TF (cofactor) using, in part, the EGF1 domain.     

Protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 specifically recognizes C-terminal residues of its substrates via helix alpha0

The catalytic domain of protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 possesses distinct substrate specificity. It recognizes the P-3 to P-5 residues of its substrates via the beta5-loop-beta6 region. To study the substrate specificity further, we determined the structure of the catalytic domain of SHP-1 (C455S) complexed with a less-favorable-substrate peptide originated from SIRPalpha. The complex has disordered N-terminal peptide structure and reduced interactions between the N-terminal peptide and the beta5-loop-beta6 region. This could be the basis for the lower affinity of peptide pY(427) for the catalytic domain of SHP-1. In addition, by comparing the SHP-1/less-favorable peptide complex structure with the SHP-1/substrate complex structures, we identified a novel substrate-recognition site in the catalytic domain of SHP-1. This site was formed by helix alpha0 and the alpha5-loop-alpha6 motif of SHP-1, and specifically bound residues at the P + 4 and further C-terminal positions of peptide substrates.     

Solution X-ray scattering reveals a novel structure of calmodulin complexed with a binding domain peptide from the HIV-1 matrix protein p17

The solution structures of complexes between calcium-saturated calmodulin (Ca (2+)/CaM) and a CaM-binding domain of the HIV-1 matrix protein p17 have been determined by small-angle X-ray scattering with use of synchrotron radiation as an intense and stable X-ray source. We used three synthetic peptides of residues 11-28, 26-47, and 11-47 of p17 to demonstrate the diversity of CaM-binding conformation. Ca (2+)/CaM complexed with residues 11-28 of p17 adopts a dumbbell-like structure at a molar ratio of 1:2, suggesting that the two peptides bind each lobe of CaM, respectively. Ca (2+)/CaM complexed with residues 26-47 of p17 at a molar ratio of 1:1 adopts a globular structure similar to the NMR structure of Ca (2+)/CaM bound to M13, which adopted a compact globular structure. In contrast to these complexes, Ca (2+)/CaM binds directly with both CaM-binding sites of residues 11-47 of p17 at a molar ratio of 1:1, which induces a novel structure different from known structures previously reported between Ca (2+)/CaM and peptide. A tertiary structural model of the novel structure was constructed using the biopolymer module of Insight II 2000 on the basis of the scattering data. The two domains of CaM remain essentially unchanged upon complexation. The hinge motions, however, occur in a highly flexible linker of CaM, in which the electrostatic residues 74Arg, 78Asp, and 82Glu interact with N-terminal electrostatic residues of the peptide (residues 12Glu, 15Arg, and 18Lys). The acidic residues in the N-terminal domain of CaM interact with basic residues in a central part of the peptide, thereby enabling the central part to change the conformations, while an acidic residue in the C-terminal domain interacts with two basic residues in the two helical sites of the peptide. The overall structure of the complex adopts an extended structure with the radius of gyration of 20.5 A and the interdomain distance of 34.2 A. Thus, the complex is principally stabilized by electrostatic interactions. The hydrophobic patches of Ca (2+)/CaM are not responsible for the binding with the hydrophobic residues in the peptide, suggesting that CaM plays a role to sequester the myristic acid moiety of p17.     

Structural characterization of the interaction of the delta and alpha subunits of the Escherichia coli F1F0-ATP synthase by NMR spectroscopy

A critical point of interaction between F(1) and F(0) in the bacterial F(1)F(0)-ATP synthase is formed by the alpha and delta subunits. Previous work has shown that the N-terminal domain (residues 3-105) of the delta subunit forms a 6 alpha-helix bundle [Wilkens, S., Dunn, S. D., Chandler, J., Dahlquist, F. W., and Capaldi, R. A. (1997) Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 198-201] and that the majority of the binding energy between delta and F(1) is provided by the interaction between the N-terminal 22 residues of the alpha- and N-terminal domain of the delta subunit [Weber, J., Muharemagic, A., Wilke-Mounts, S., and Senior, A. E. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 13623-13626]. We have now analyzed a 1:1 complex of the delta-subunit N-terminal domain and a peptide comprising the N-terminal 22 residues of the alpha subunit by heteronuclear protein NMR spectroscopy. A comparison of the chemical-shift values of delta-subunit residues with and without alpha N-terminal peptide bound indicates that the binding interface on the N-terminal domain of the delta subunit is formed by alpha helices I and V. NOE cross-peak patterns in 2D (12)C/(12)C-filtered NOESY spectra of the (13)C-labeled delta-subunit N-terminal domain in complex with unlabeled peptide verify that residues 8-18 in the alpha-subunit N-terminal peptide are folded as an alpha helix when bound to delta N-terminal domain. On the basis of intermolecular contacts observed in (12)C/(13)C-filtered NOESY experiments, we describe structural details of the interaction of the delta-subunit N-terminal domain with the alpha-subunit N-terminal alpha helix.     

Identification of a talin-binding site in the integrin beta(3) subunit distinct from the NPLY regulatory motif of post-ligand binding functions. The talin n-terminal head domain interacts with the membrane-proximal region of the beta(3) cytoplasmic tail.

Following platelet aggregation, integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) becomes associated with the platelet cytoskeleton. The conserved NPLY sequence represents a potential beta-turn motif in the beta(3) cytoplasmic tail and has been suggested to mediate the interaction of beta(3) integrins with talin. In the present study, we performed a double mutation (N744Q/P745A) in the integrin beta(3) subunit to test the functional significance of this beta-turn motif. Chinese hamster ovary cells were co-transfected with cDNA constructs encoding mutant beta(3) and wild type alpha(IIb). Cells expressing either wild type (A5) or mutant (D4) alpha(IIb)beta(3) adhered to fibrinogen; however, as opposed to control A5 cells, adherent D4 cells failed to spread, form focal adhesions, or initiate protein tyrosine phosphorylation. To investigate the role of the NPLY motif in talin binding, we examined the ability of the mutant alpha(IIb)beta(3) to interact with talin in a solid phase binding assay. Both wild type and mutant alpha(IIb)beta(3), purified by RGD affinity chromatography, bound to a similar extent to immobilized talin. Additionally, purified talin failed to interact with peptides containing the AKWDTANNPLYK sequence indicating that the talin binding domain in the integrin beta(3) subunit does not reside in the NPLY motif. In contrast, specific binding of talin to peptides containing the membrane-proximal HDRKEFAKFEEERARAK sequence of the beta(3) cytoplasmic tail was observed, and this interaction was blocked by a recombinant protein fragment corresponding to the 47-kDa N-terminal head domain of talin (rTalin-N). In addition, RGD affinity purified platelet alpha(IIb)beta(3) bound dose-dependently to immobilized rTalin-N, indicating that an integrin-binding site is present in the talin N-terminal head domain. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that the NPLY beta-turn motif regulates post-ligand binding functions of alpha(IIb)beta(3) in a manner independent of talin interaction. Moreover, talin was shown to bind through its N-terminal head domain to the membrane-proximal sequence of the beta(3) cytoplasmic tail.     

E230Q mutation of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase affects local structure and the binding of peptide inhibitor

The active site of the mammalian cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (C-subunit) has a cluster of nonconserved acidic residues-Glu127, Glu170, Glu203, Glu230, and Asp241-that are crucial for substrate recognition and binding. Studies have shown that the Glu230 to Gln mutant (E230Q) of the enzyme has physical properties similar to the wild-type enzyme and has decreased affinity for a short peptide substrate, Kemptide. However, recent experiments intended to crystallize ternary complex of the E230Q mutant with MgATP and protein kinase inhibitor (PKI) could only obtain crystals of the apo-enzyme of E230Q mutant. To deduce the possible mechanism that prevented ternary complex formation, we used the relaxed-complex method (Lin, J.-H., et al. J Am Chem Soc 2002, 24, 5632-5633) to study PKI binding to the E230Q mutant C-subunit. In the E230Q mutant, we observed local structural changes of the peptide binding site that correlated closely to the reduced PKI affinity. The structural changes occurred in the F-to-G helix loop and appeared to hinder PKI binding. Reduced electrostatic potential repulsion among Asp241 from the helix loop section and the other acidic residues in the peptide binding site appear to be responsible for the structural change.