Circadian temperature rhythms in clockwise and counter-clockwise rapidly rotating shift schedules

The purpose of this study was to examine the circadian temperature rhythm in clockwise (CW) and counter-clockwise (CCW) rapidly rotating shift schedules. Arguments against the CCW rotation of shifts are that they result in shortened sleep and promote greater disruption of circadian rhythms. The 3-week study included a week of day shifts (0800-1600) and 2 weeks of shiftwork. The CW 2-2-1 schedule rotated from two early mornings (0600-1400) to two evenings (1400-2200) to one midnight shift (2200-0600) allowing 24 hours off at each shift rotation and a 48-hour weekend. The CCW schedule rotated from two evenings to two early mornings to one midnight shifts allowing only 8 hours off at each shift rotation and an 80-hour weekend. Analysis of the 72-hr periods at the end of each workweek, including the midnight shifts and recovery periods during weeks 2 and 3 were compared to the same 72-hour period at the end of week 1 (baseline). A cosine function that fit the temperature curves by minimizing the sums of squares produced parameters that underwent analysis of covariance procedures. Significant differences were found between rotation conditions for amplitude and acrophase. An attenuation of amplitude and a delay in the acrophase was the found for the counter-clockwise condition. Features inherent in this schedule might explain these effects, particularly, the increased opportunity for "sleeping in" at the beginning of the week and an expanded (2-shift) workday at the end of the week.     

A Compromise Phase Position for Permanent Night Shift Workers: Circadian Phase after Two Night Shifts with Scheduled Sleep and Light/Dark Exposure

Night shift work is associated with a myriad of health and safety risks. Phase‐shifting the circadian clock such that it is more aligned with night work and day sleep is one way to attenuate these risks. However, workers will not be satisfied with complete adaptation to night work if it leaves them misaligned during days off. Therefore, the goal of this set of studies is to produce a compromise phase position in which individuals working night shifts delay their circadian clocks to a position that is more compatible with nighttime work and daytime sleep yet is not incompatible with late nighttime sleep on days off. This is the first in the set of studies describing the magnitude of circadian phase delays that occurs on progressively later days within a series of night shifts interspersed with days off. The series will be ended on various days in order to take a “snapshot” of circadian phase. In this set of studies, subjects sleep from 23:00 to 7:00 h for three weeks. Following this baseline period, there is a series of night shifts (23:00 to 07:00 h) and days off. Experimental subjects receive five 15 min intermittent bright light pulses (～3500 lux; ～1100 µW/cm²) once per hour during the night shifts, wear sunglasses that attenuate all visible wavelengths—especially short wavelengths (“blue‐blockers”)—while traveling home after the shifts, and sleep in the dark (08:30–15:30 h) after each night shift. Control subjects remain in typical dim room light (<50 lux) throughout the night shift, wear sunglasses that do not attenuate as much light, and sleep whenever they want after the night shifts. Circadian phase is determined from the circadian rhythm of melatonin collected during a dim light phase assessment at the beginning and end of each study. The sleepiest time of day, approximated by the body temperature minimum (T_min), is estimated by adding 7 h to the dim light melatonin onset. In this first study, circadian phase was measured after two night shifts and day sleep periods. The T_min of the experimental subjects (n=11) was 04:24±0.8 h (mean±SD) at baseline and 7:36±1.4 h after the night shifts. Thus, after two night shifts, the T_min had not yet delayed into the daytime sleep period, which began at 08:30 h. The T_min of the control subjects (n=12) was 04:00±1.2 h at baseline and drifted to 4:36±1.4 h after the night shifts. Thus, two night shifts with a practical pattern of intermittent bright light, the wearing of sunglasses on the way home from night shifts, and a regular sleep period early in the daytime, phase delayed the circadian clock toward the desired compromise phase position for permanent night shift workers. Additional night shifts with bright light pulses and daytime sleep in the dark are expected to displace the sleepiest time of day into the daytime sleep period, improving both nighttime alertness and daytime sleep but not precluding adequate sleep on days off.     

Phase shifts of human circadian rhythms due to shifts of artificial Zeitgebers

In special isolation units, circadian rhythms of human subjects have been investigated under the influence of artificial 24-h Zeitgebers, with 6-h advance and 6-h delay shifts of the Zeitgeber simulating time zone shifts. In most cases, the biological rhythms follow the Zeitgeber shifts in the course of several days: in rare cases, advancing Zeitgeber shifts are followed by delaying shifts of the biological rhythms, either of all variables or, partitioning, of only some of the variables. The rhythm of activity is re-entrained after both Zeitgeber shifts within a few days, independent of the shift direction. The rhythm of rectal temperature needs more time for re-entrainment than the activity rhythm; the rate of re-entrainment is consistently higher after advance than after delay shifts ('direction asymmetry'). Mean value and amplitude of the rectal temperature rhythm are, for some days, reduced after the advance but not after the delay Zeitgeber shift; among the different subjects, the reduction in amplitude is significantly correlated with the direction asymmetry. The rhythm of psychomotor performance (computation speed) re-entrains in parallel to that of rectal temperature; i.e. the performance level is decreased after advance but not after delay shifts. The direction asymmetry in the re-entrainment rates seems to contradict findings in flight experiments where this rate is mostly higher after westward than after eastward flights. Careful considerations, however, show that differences in the re-entrainment behavior after real and simulated time zone shifts disappear when the experimental designs are approximated and when identical procedures of analyzing the data are applied. The results of the time shift experiments are, in all respects tested, in agreement with theoretical postulations; hence, they confirm once more properties of the circadian system deduced earlier. On the other hand, the results are of practical importance since they state significant correlations between the re-entrainment behavior and rhythm parameters measured before the Zeitgeber shifts; this behavior, therefore, can be predicted from data obtained already before the Zeitgeber has been changed in any way: The duration of re-entrainment is correlated with the amplitude, and the decrement in performance with the phase of the rectal temperature rhythm. These practical implications may also apply to shift work.     

A compromise phase position for permanent night shift workers: circadian phase after two night shifts with scheduled sleep and light/dark exposure

Night shift work is associated with a myriad of health and safety risks. Phase-shifting the circadian clock such that it is more aligned with night work and day sleep is one way to attenuate these risks. However, workers will not be satisfied with complete adaptation to night work if it leaves them misaligned during days off. Therefore, the goal of this set of studies is to produce a compromise phase position in which individuals working night shifts delay their circadian clocks to a position that is more compatible with nighttime work and daytime sleep yet is not incompatible with late nighttime sleep on days off. This is the first in the set of studies describing the magnitude of circadian phase delays that occurs on progressively later days within a series of night shifts interspersed with days off. The series will be ended on various days in order to take a "snapshot" of circadian phase. In this set of studies, subjects sleep from 23:00 to 7:00 h for three weeks. Following this baseline period, there is a series of night shifts (23:00 to 07:00 h) and days off. Experimental subjects receive five 15 min intermittent bright light pulses (approximately 3500 lux; approximately 1100 microW/cm2) once per hour during the night shifts, wear sunglasses that attenuate all visible wavelengths--especially short wavelengths ("blue-blockers")--while traveling home after the shifts, and sleep in the dark (08:30-15:30 h) after each night shift. Control subjects remain in typical dim room light (<50 lux) throughout the night shift, wear sunglasses that do not attenuate as much light, and sleep whenever they want after the night shifts. Circadian phase is determined from the circadian rhythm of melatonin collected during a dim light phase assessment at the beginning and end of each study. The sleepiest time of day, approximated by the body temperature minimum (Tmin), is estimated by adding 7 h to the dim light melatonin onset. In this first study, circadian phase was measured after two night shifts and day sleep periods. The Tmin of the experimental subjects (n=11) was 04:24+/-0.8 h (mean+/-SD) at baseline and 7:36+/-1.4 h after the night shifts. Thus, after two night shifts, the Tmin had not yet delayed into the daytime sleep period, which began at 08:30 h. The Tmin of the control subjects (n=12) was 04:00+/-1.2 h at baseline and drifted to 4:36+/-1.4 h after the night shifts. Thus, two night shifts with a practical pattern of intermittent bright light, the wearing of sunglasses on the way home from night shifts, and a regular sleep period early in the daytime, phase delayed the circadian clock toward the desired compromise phase position for permanent night shift workers. Additional night shifts with bright light pulses and daytime sleep in the dark are expected to displace the sleepiest time of day into the daytime sleep period, improving both nighttime alertness and daytime sleep but not precluding adequate sleep on days off.     

Temperature dependence of switching of the bacterial flagellar motor by the protein CheY(13DK106YW).

The behavior of the bacterium Escherichia coli is controlled by switching of the flagellar rotary motor between the two rotational states, clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW). The molecular mechanism for switching remains unknown, but binding of the response regulator CheY-P to the motor component FliM enhances CW rotation. This effect is mimicked by the unphosphorylated double mutant CheY13DK106YW (CheY**). To learn more about switching, we measured the fraction of time that a motor spends in the CW state (the CW bias) at different concentrations of CheY** and at different temperatures. From the CW bias, we computed the standard free energy change of switching. In the absence of CheY, this free energy change is a linear function of temperature (. Biophys. J. 71:2227-2233). In the presence of CheY**, it is nonlinear. However, the data can be fit by models in which binding of each molecule of CheY** shifts the difference in free energy between CW and CCW states by a fixed amount. The shift increases linearly from approximately 0.3kT per molecule at 5 degrees C to approximately 0.9kT at 25 degrees C, where k is Boltzmann's constant and T is 289 Kelvin (= 16 degrees C). The entropy and enthalpy contributions to this shift are about -0. 031kT/ degrees C and 0.10kT, respectively.     

Mirror imaging phase response curves obtained for the circadian rhythm of a bat with single steps of light and darkness∗

Abstract

The circadian rhythm in the flight activity of a tropical microchiropteran bat Taphozous melanopogon responds at all phases with delay phase shifts to single light‐on steps (DD/LL transfers). The circadian rhythm responds at all phases with advance phase shifts to single light‐off steps (LL/DD transfers). Phase shifts were measured from the delays or advances of the onsets of flight activity on days following DD/LL and LL/DD transfers relative to the temporal course of the onsets of activity in controls. The magnitude of the phase shifts was a function of the phases in which the transfers were made. The On‐PRC and Off‐PRC plotted from such data are mirror‐images in their time‐course and wave‐form.

The phase shifts of the circadian rhythm in either direction were accompanied by changes in period (for the duration of our recordings after die transfer). The period lengthened following a delay shift and it shortened following an advance shift. The phase shifts are abrupt and discernible in the first cycle after perturbation. There are no transients.     

Thoracic surface temperature rhythms as circadian biomarkers for cancer chronotherapy

The disruption of the temperature circadian rhythm has been associated with cancer progression, while its amplification resulted in cancer inhibition in experimental tumor models. The current study investigated the relevance of skin surface temperature rhythms as biomarkers of the Circadian Timing System (CTS) in order to optimize chronotherapy timing in individual cancer patients. Baseline skin surface temperature at four sites and wrist accelerations were measured every minute for 4?days in 16 patients with metastatic gastro-intestinal cancer before chronotherapy administration. Temperature and rest-activity were recorded, respectively, with wireless skin surface temperature patches (Respironics, Phillips) and an actigraph (Ambulatory Monitoring). Both variables were further monitored in 10 of these patients during and after a 4-day course of a fixed chronotherapy protocol. Collected at baseline, during and after therapy longitudinal data sets were processed using Fast Fourier Transform Cosinor and Linear Discriminant Analyses methods. A circadian rhythm was statistically validated with a period of 24?h (p?<?0.05) for 49/61 temperature time series (80.3%), and 15/16 rest-activity patterns (93.7%) at baseline. However, individual circadian amplitudes varied from 0.04?°C to 2.86?°C for skin surface temperature (median, 0.72?°C), and from 16.6 to 146.1?acc/min for rest-activity (median, 88.9?acc/min). Thirty-nine pairs of baseline temperature and rest-activity time series (75%) were correlated (r?>?|0.7|; p?<?0.05). Individual circadian acrophases at baseline were scattered from 15:18 to 6:05 for skin surface temperature, and from 12:19 to 15:18 for rest-activity, with respective median values of 01:10 (25–75% quartiles, 22:35–3:07) and 14:12 (13:14–14:31). The circadian patterns in skin surface temperature and rest-activity persisted or were amplified during and after fixed chronotherapy delivery for 5/10 patients. In contrast, transient or sustained disruption of these biomarkers was found for the five other patients, as indicated by the lack of any statistically significant dominant period in the circadian range. No consistent correlation (r?<?|0.7|, p?≥?0.05) was found between paired rest-activity and temperature time series during fixed chronotherapy delivery. In conclusion, large inter-patient differences in circadian amplitudes and acrophases of skin surface temperature were demonstrated for the first time in cancer patients, despite rather similar rest-activity acrophases. The patient-dependent coupling between both CTS biomarkers, and its possible alteration on a fixed chronotherapy protocol, support the concept of personalized cancer chronotherapy.     

Partial sleep deprivation reduces phase advances to light in humans

Partial sleep deprivation is increasingly common in modern society. This study examined for the first time if partial sleep deprivation alters circadian phase shifts to bright light in humans. Thirteen young healthy subjects participated in a repeated-measures counterbalanced design with 2 conditions. Each condition had baseline sleep, a dim-light circadian phase assessment, a 3-day phase-advancing protocol with morning bright light, then another phase assessment. In one condition (no sleep deprivation), subjects had an 8-h sleep opportunity per night during the advancing protocol. In the other condition (partial sleep deprivation), subjects were kept awake for 4 h in near darkness (<0.25 lux), immediately followed by a 4-h sleep opportunity per night during the advancing protocol. The morning bright light stimulus was four 30-min pulses of bright light (~5000 lux), separated by 30-min intervals of room light. The light always began at the same circadian phase, 8 h after the baseline dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO). The average phase advance without sleep deprivation was 1.8 ± 0.6 (SD) h, which reduced to 1.4 ± 0.6 h with partial sleep deprivation (p < 0.05). Ten of the 13 subjects showed reductions in phase advances with partial sleep deprivation, ranging from 0.2 to 1.2 h. These results indicate that short-term partial sleep deprivation can moderately reduce circadian phase shifts to bright light in humans. This may have significant implications for the sleep-deprived general population and for the bright light treatment of circadian rhythm sleep disorders such as delayed sleep phase disorder.     

Exogenous melatonin reduces the resynchronization time after phase shifts of a nonphotic zeitgeber in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus)

Continuous melatonin administration via silastic implants accelerates the resynchronization of the circadian locomotor activity rhythm in house sparrows (Passer domesticus) after exposure to phase shifts of a weak light-dark cycle. Constant melatonin might induce this effect either by increasing the sensitivity of the visual system to a light zeitgeber or by reducing the degree of self-sustainment of the circadian pacemaker. To distinguish between these two possible mechanisms, two groups of house sparrows, one carrying melatonin implants and the other empty implants, were kept in constant dim light and subjected to advance and delay shifts of a 12-h feeding phase. The resynchronization times of their circadian feeding rhythm following the phase shifts were significantly shorter when the birds carried melatonin implants than when they carried empty implants. In a second experiment, melatonin-implanted and control birds were released into food ad libitum conditions 2 days after either a delay or an advance phase shift. The number of hours by which the activity rhythms had been shifted on the second day in food ad libitum conditions was assessed. Melatonin-implanted house sparrows had significantly larger phase shifts in their circadian feeding rhythm than control birds. This is in accordance with the first experiment since a larger phase shift at a given time reflects accelerated resynchronization. Additionally, the second experiment also excludes any possible masking effects of the nonphotic zeitgeber. In conclusion, constant melatonin accelerates resynchronization even after phase shifts of a nonphotic zeitgeber, indicating that constant high levels of melatonin can reduce the degree of self-sustainment of the circadian pacemaker independent of any effects on the photoreceptive system.     

Failure of extraocular light to facilitate circadian rhythm reentrainment in humans

Although extraocular light can entrain the circadian rhythms of invertebrates and nonmammalian vertebrates, almost all studies show that the mammalian circadian system can only be affected by light to the eyes. The exception is a recent study by Campbell and Murphy that reported phase shifts in humans to bright light applied with fiber-optic pads behind the knees (popliteal region). We tested whether this extraocular light stimulus could accelerate the entrainment of circadian rhythms to a shift of the sleep schedule, as occurs in shift work or jet lag. In experiment 1, the sleep/dark episodes were delayed 8h from baseline for 2 days, and 3h light exposures were timed to occur before the temperature minimum to help delay circadian rhythms. There were three groups: (1) bright (about 13,000 lux) extraocular light from fiber-optic pads, (2) control (dim light, 10-20 lux), and (3) medium-intensity (about 1000 lux) ocular light from light boxes. In experiment 2, the sleep/dark episodes were inverted, and extraocular light was applied either before the temperature minimum to help delay circadian rhythms or after the temperature minimum to help advance rhythms. Circadian phase markers were the salivary dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) and the rectal temperature minimum. There was no evidence that the popliteal extraocular light had a phase-shifting effect in either experiment. Possible reasons for phase shifts in the Campbell and Murphy study and not the current study include the many differences between the protocols. In the current study, there was substantial sleep deprivation before the extraocular light was applied. There was a large shift in the sleep/dark schedule, rather than allowing subjects to sleep each day from midnight to noon, as in the Campbell and Murphy study. Also, when extraocular light was applied in the current protocol, subjects did not experience a change from sleeping to awake, a change in posture (from lying in bed to sitting in a chair), or a change in ocular light (from dark to dim light). Further research is necessary to determine the conditions under which extraocular light might produce phase shifts in human circadian rhythms. (Chronobiology International, 17(6), 807-826, 2000).     

Gentamicin-Induced Chronotoxicity: Use of Body Temperature as a Orcadian Marker Rhythm

Aminoglycoside antibiotics produce varying degrees of ototoxicity, dependent on dosage time, in animals synchronized for rhythm study. Herein, we illustrate the use of an economical and reliable system to telemeter body temperature of laboratory animals as an endogenous marker rhythm for gentamicin-induxed ototoxicity. Two groups of 3 male Sprague-Dawley rats (250–400 gm) were housed in separate cages in a temperature-controlled room programmed with a 12:12 LD schedule and monitored for hearing thresholds at the frequencies of 8kHz, 16kHz, 24kHz and 32kHz at 2-week intervals. Each rat was dosed with 100 mg/kg/day gentamicin subcutaneously for a duration of 28 days. The animals from one group were dosed at their daily temperature maximum, while the animals of the other group were dosed at their daily temperature minimum. Both after 14 and 28 days of gentamicin treatment there was no important changes in auditory thresholds from baseline values when treatment was timed daily to the circadian peak of body temperature. Animals dosed daily at the trough of the circadian temperature rhythm evidenced an auditory threshold shift of between 5 and 25 dB after 14 days of treatment and a total hearing loss (80–90 dB) after 28 days of such treatment. These results document a dramatically greater level of hearing loss induced in those animals dosed with gentamicin at the body temperature trough (diurnal rest span) as compared to those dosed at the acrophase (nocturnal activity span). The findings indicate that the peak and trough of the circadian pattern of body temperature serve as meaningful markers of the resistance and susceptibility, respectively, of gentamicin-induced ototoxicity in rodent models.     

Gentamicin-Induced Chronotoxicity: Use of Body Temperature as a Orcadian Marker Rhythm

Aminoglycoside antibiotics produce varying degrees of ototoxicity, dependent on dosage time, in animals synchronized for rhythm study. Herein, we illustrate the use of an economical and reliable system to telemeter body temperature of laboratory animals as an endogenous marker rhythm for gentamicin-induxed ototoxicity. Two groups of 3 male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-400 gm) were housed in separate cages in a temperature-controlled room programmed with a 12:12 LD schedule and monitored for hearing thresholds at the frequencies of 8kHz, 16kHz, 24kHz and 32kHz at 2-week intervals. Each rat was dosed with 100 mg/kg/day gentamicin subcutaneously for a duration of 28 days. The animals from one group were dosed at their daily temperature maximum, while the animals of the other group were dosed at their daily temperature minimum. Both after 14 and 28 days of gentamicin treatment there was no important changes in auditory thresholds from baseline values when treatment was timed daily to the circadian peak of body temperature. Animals dosed daily at the trough of the circadian temperature rhythm evidenced an auditory threshold shift of between 5 and 25 dB after 14 days of treatment and a total hearing loss (80-90 dB) after 28 days of such treatment. These results document a dramatically greater level of hearing loss induced in those animals dosed with gentamicin at the body temperature trough (diurnal rest span) as compared to those dosed at the acrophase (nocturnal activity span). The findings indicate that the peak and trough of the circadian pattern of body temperature serve as meaningful markers of the resistance and susceptibility, respectively, of gentamicin-induced ototoxicity in rodent models.     

Gentamicin-induced chronotoxicity: use of body temperature as a circadian marker rhythm

Aminoglycoside antibiotics produce varying degrees of ototoxicity, dependent on dosage time, in animals synchronized for rhythm study. Herein, we illustrate the use of an economical and reliable system to telemeter body temperature of laboratory animals as an endogenous marker rhythm for gentamicin-induced ototoxicity. Two groups of 3 male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-400 gm) were housed in separate cages in a temperature-controlled room programmed with a 12:12 LD schedule and monitored for hearing thresholds at the frequencies of 8kHz, 16 kHz, 24 kHz and 32 kHz at 2-week intervals. Each rat was dosed with 100 mg/kg/day gentamicin subcutaneously for a duration of 28 days. The animals from one group were dosed at their daily temperature maximum, while the animals of the other group were dosed at their daily temperature minimum. Both after 14 and 28 days of gentamicin treatment there was no important changes in auditory thresholds from baseline values when treatment was timed daily to the circadian peak of body temperature. Animals dosed daily at the trough of the circadian temperature rhythm evidenced an auditory threshold shift of between 5 and 25 dB after 14 days of treatment and a total hearing loss (80-90 dB) after 28 days of such treatment. These results document a dramatically greater level of hearing loss induced in those animals dosed with gentamicin at the body temperature trough (diurnal rest span) as compared to those dosed at the acrophase (nocturnal activity span). The findings indicate that the peak and trough of the circadian pattern of body temperature serve as meaningful markers of the resistance and susceptibility, respectively, of gentamicin-induced ototoxicity in rodent models.     

Is sleep per se a zeitgeber in humans?

It is not clear whether shifting of sleep per se, without a concomitant change in the light-dark cycle, can induce a phase shift of the human circadian pacemaker. Two 9-day protocols (crossover, counterbalanced order) were completed by 4 men and 6 women (20-34 years) after adherence to a 2330 to 0800 h sleep episode at home for 2 weeks. Following a modified baseline constant routine (CR) protocol on day 2, they remained under continuous near-darkness (< 0.2 lux, including sleep) for 6 days. Four isocaloric meals were equally distributed during scheduled wakefulness, and their timing was held constant. Subjects remained supine inbed from 2100 to 0800 h on all days; sleep was fixed from 2330 to 0800 h in the control condition and was gradually advanced 20 min per day during the sleep advance condition until a 2-h difference had been attained. On day 9, a 25 to 27 h CR protocol (approximately 0.1 lux) was carried out. Phase markers were the evening decline time of the core body temperature (CBT) rhythm and salivary melatonin onset (3 pg/ml threshhold). In the fixed sleep condition, the phase drift over 7 days ranged from +1.62 to -2.56 h (for both CBT and melatonin rhythms, which drifted in parallel). The drifts were consistently advanced in the sleep advance schedule by +0.66 +/- 0.23 (SEM) h for CBT (p = 0.02) and by 0.27 +/- 0.14 h for melatonin rhythms (p = 0.09). However, this advance was small to medium according to effect size. Sleep per se may feed back onto the circadian pacemaker, but it appears to be a weak zeitgeber in humans.     

Changes in the diurnal rhythms of cortisol,melatonin, and testosterone after 2, 4, and 7 consecutive night shifts in male police officers

Night work is associated with a large range of acute health problems and possibly also health consequences in the long run. Yet, only very few field studies specifically investigate the effects of consecutive night shift on key physiological regulatory systems. In this field study, we investigated the effects of consecutive night shifts on three hormones, melatonin, cortisol, and testosterone, among police officers at work. More specifically, the aim was to investigate how the diurnal rhythms of melatonin, cortisol, and testosterone responded to two, four, and seven consecutive night shifts and a corresponding number of days for recovery. The study was part of the “In the Middle of the Night” project and included 73 male police officers from five different police districts. The participants were exposed to three intervention conditions: “2+2”: two consecutive night shifts followed by two consecutive day recovery days; “4+4”: four consecutive night shifts followed by four consecutive recovery days; “7+7”: seven consecutive night shifts followed by seven consecutive recovery days. On the last day with night shift and the last recovery day in each intervention, the participants collected saliva samples every 4th hour when awake. The diurnal rhythms of melatonin, cortisol, and testosterone were all affected differently by an increasing number of consecutive night shifts: the amplitude of the melatonin rhythm was suppressed by 4.9% per day (95% CI 1.4–8.2% per day; p = 0.006). The diurnal rhythm of cortisol phase was delayed with an increasing number of night shifts by 33 min/day (95% CI 18–48 min per day; p ≤ 0.001), but did not show any changes in amplitude. For the diurnal rhythm of testosterone, there was no effect of the number of consecutive night shifts and the diurnal rhythm completely followed the sleep/wake cycle. We found that there were no differences in the rhythms of melatonin, cortisol, and testosterone after 2, 4, and 7 recovery days, respectively. In conclusion, we found signs of desynchronization in terms of suppressed amplitude of melatonin and phase delay of salivary cortisol as a consequence of the increasing number of consecutive night shifts among police officers at work. Lack of synchronization has been suggested as a possible mechanism linking night work to disease, but this remains to be determined.     

TheBulla ocular circadian pacemaker

In an effort to understand the cellular basis of entrainment of circadian oscillators we have studied the role of membrane potential changes in the neurons which comprise the ocular circadian pacemaker of Bulla gouldiana in mediating phase shifts of the ocular circadian rhythm. We report that: 1. Intracellular recording was used to measure directly the effects of the phase shifting agents light, serotonin, and 8-bromo-cAMP on the membrane potential of the basal retinal neurons. We found that light pulses evoke a transient depolarization followed by a smaller sustained depolarization. Application of serotonin produced a biphasic response; a transient depolarization followed by a sustained hyperpolarization. Application of a membrane permeable analog of the intracellular second messenger cAMP, 8-bromo-cAMP, elicited sustained hyperpolarization, and occasionally a weak phasic depolarization. 2. Changing the membrane potential of the basal retinal neurons directly and selectively with intracellularly injected current phase shifts the ocular circadian rhythm. Both depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current can shift the phase of the circadian oscillator. Depolarizing current mimics the phase shifting action of light, while hyperpolarizing current produces phase shifts which are transposed approximately 180 degrees in circadian time to depolarization. 3. Altering BRN membrane potential with ionic treatments, depolarizing with elevated K+ seawater or hyperpolarizing with lowered Na+ seawater, produces phase shifts similar to current injection. 4. The light-induced depolarization of the basal retinal neurons is necessary for phase shifts by light. Suppressing the light-induced depolarization with injected current inhibits light-induced phase shifts. 5. The ability of membrane potential changes to shift oscillator phase is dependent on extracellular calcium. Reducing extracellular free Ca++ from 10 mM to 1.3 X 10(-7) M inhibits light-induced phase shifts without blocking the photic response of the BRNs. The results indicate that changes in the membrane potential of the pacemaker neurons play a critical role in phase shifting the circadian rhythm, and imply that a voltage-dependent and calcium-dependent process, possibly Ca++ influx, shifts oscillator phase in response to light.     

Rapid Changes in the Light/Dark Cycle Disrupt Memory of Conditioned Fear in Mice

Background

Circadian rhythms govern many aspects of physiology and behavior including cognitive processes. Components of neural circuits involved in learning and memory, e.g., the amygdala and the hippocampus, exhibit circadian rhythms in gene expression and signaling pathways. The functional significance of these rhythms is still not understood. In the present study, we sought to determine the impact of transiently disrupting the circadian system by shifting the light/dark (LD) cycle. Such “jet lag” treatments alter daily rhythms of gene expression that underlie circadian oscillations as well as disrupt the synchrony between the multiple oscillators found within the body.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We subjected adult male C57Bl/6 mice to a contextual fear conditioning protocol either before or after acute phase shifts of the LD cycle. As part of this study, we examined the impact of phase advances and phase delays, and the effects of different magnitudes of phase shifts. Under all conditions tested, we found that recall of fear conditioned behavior was specifically affected by the jet lag. We found that phase shifts potentiated the stress-evoked corticosterone response without altering baseline levels of this hormone. The jet lag treatment did not result in overall sleep deprivation, but altered the temporal distribution of sleep. Finally, we found that prior experience of jet lag helps to compensate for the reduced recall due to acute phase shifts.

Conclusions/Significance

Acute changes to the LD cycle affect the recall of fear-conditioned behavior. This suggests that a synchronized circadian system may be broadly important for normal cognition and that the consolidation of memories may be particularly sensitive to disruptions of circadian timing.     

Estimating the circadian rhythm in the risk of occupational injuries and accidents

The authors recently published a prototypic Risk Index (RI) to estimate the risk of critical errors associated with shift systems. This RI was based on published trends in the relative risk of injuries and accidents, and a simple additive model was proposed to estimate the risk for a given shift system. However, extending the RI to irregular work schedules requires an estimation of the phase and amplitude of the circadian rhythm in risk. This paper integrates the published evidence on three independent sources of data that allow such estimations to be made: the trend in risk over a 24 h day, over the course of the night shift, and across the three different (8 h) shifts. Despite potential confounders, maximum risk (i.e., acrophase=peak time) estimates across these three trends showed a remarkable consistency, with all three estimates occurring at about midnight, although the amplitude estimates varied considerably. The best estimate of the amplitude of the circadian rhythm in risk would appear to be that based on trend over the three (8 h) shifts, as this trend is the least confounded. The estimated acrophase (peak time) in risk appeared earlier than would be predicted from consideration of the circadian rhythm in alertness, fatigue, or performance on simple interpolated tasks, such as reaction time or performance on the Psychomotor Vigilance Test.     

FAILURE OF EXTRAOCULAR LIGHT TO FACILITATE CIRCADIAN RHYTHM REENTRAINMENT IN HUMANS

Although extraocular light can entrain the circadian rhythms of invertebrates and nonmammalian vertebrates, almost all studies show that the mammalian circadian system can only be affected by light to the eyes. The exception is a recent study by Campbell and Murphy that reported phase shifts in humans to bright light applied with fiber-optic pads behind the knees (popliteal region). We tested whether this extraocular light stimulus could accelerate the entrainment of circadian rhythms to a shift of the sleep schedule, as occurs in shift work or jet lag. In experiment 1, the sleep/dark episodes were delayed 8h from baseline for 2 days, and 3h light exposures were timed to occur before the temperature minimum to help delay circadian rhythms. There were three groups: (1) bright (about 13,000 lux) extraocular light from fiber-optic pads, (2) control (dim light, 10–20 lux), and (3) medium-intensity (about 1000 lux) ocular light from light boxes. In experiment 2, the sleep/dark episodes were inverted, and extraocular light was applied either before the temperature minimum to help delay circadian rhythms or after the temperature minimum to help advance rhythms. Circadian phase markers were the salivary dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) and the rectal temperature minimum. There was no evidence that the popliteal extraocular light had a phase-shifting effect in either experiment. Possible reasons for phase shifts in the Campbell and Murphy study and not the current study include the many differences between the protocols. In the current study, there was substantial sleep deprivation before the extraocular light was applied. There was a large shift in the sleep/dark schedule, rather than allowing subjects to sleep each day from midnight to noon, as in the Campbell and Murphy study. Also, when extraocular light was applied in the current protocol, subjects did not experience a change from sleeping to awake, a change in posture (from lying in bed to sitting in a chair), or a change in ocular light (from dark to dim light). Further research is necessary to determine the conditions under which extraocular light might produce phase shifts in human circadian rhythms. (Chronobiology International, 17(6), 807–826, 2000).     

Synchronization of the Circadian Activity Rhythm in Hamsters Following Intermittent Schedule Shifts

The time course of resynchronization of the circadian activity rhythm of hamsters was observed following a 10-hr advance or delay in the light-dark cycle (LD 12:12). Twenty-six shift patterns of the lighting schedule were studied; they consisted of continuous (daily), three-step, two-step and one-step shifting. So long as the daily shift of the lighting schedule was 1 hr or less, the locomotor rhythm followed the continuous shift perfectly. As the amount of daily shift increased, the time course of activity onset deviated more from the time of lights off; the tendency was more marked in advancing than in delaying shifts. Responses of the activity rhythm to stepwise shifting were essentially the same as those to a continuous shift. They were, however, characterized by larger individual variations, and it took additional days before entrainment was achieved. By fitting the time course of entrainment to an exponential model with a constant term, estimates of time constant and shift error were derived. The time constant became shorter with increasing amounts of daily shifts up to 2 hr per day, increasing the number of shift steps, and/or reducing the amount of the initial shift of the seies. The shift error estimated was 0.51 ± 0.12 hr, indicating precise resynchronization. Accordingly, a quicker resynchronization may be expected when a multiple step shift with a moderate initial shift are employed. In the case of a 10-hr shift, for example, a shift of 3 hr followed by another 7 hr may be recommended.