Open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: the mechanism of polymerase-induced strand separation of double helical DNA

Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is able to site-specifically melt 12 bp of promoter DNA at temperatures far below those normally associated with DNA melting. Here we consider several models to explain how RNA polymerase destabilizes duplex DNA. One popular model proposes that upon binding to the promoter, RNA polymerase untwists the spacer DNA between the –10 and –35 regions, which results in a destabilization of the –10 region at a TA base step where melting initiates. Promoter untwisting may result, in part, from extensive wrapping of the DNA around RNA polymerase. Formation of the strand-separated open complex appears to be facilitated by specific protein-DNA interactions which occur predominantly on the non-template strand. Recent evidence suggests that these include important contacts with Sigma factor region 2.3, which we propose binds the displaced single strand of DNA.     

The -11A of promoter DNA and two conserved amino acids in the melting region of sigma70 both directly affect the rate limiting step in formation of the stable RNA polymerase-promoter complex, but they do not necessarily interact

Formation of the stable, strand separated, ‘open’ complex between RNA polymerase and a promoter involves DNA melting of approximately 14 base pairs. The likely nucleation site is the highly conserved −11A base in the non-template strand of the −10 promoter region. Amino acid residues Y430 and W433 on the σ⁷⁰ subunit of the RNA polymerase participate in the strand separation. The roles of −11A and of the Y430 and W433 were addressed by employing synthetic consensus promoters containing base analog and other substitutions at −11 in the non-template strand, and σ⁷⁰ variants bearing amino acid substitutions at positions 430 and 433. Substitutions for −11A and for Y430 and W433 in σ⁷⁰ have small or no effects on formation of the initial RNA polymerase-promoter complex, but exert their effects on subsequent steps on the way to formation of the open complex. As substitutions for Y430 and W433 also affect open complex formation on promoter DNA lacking the −11A base, it is concluded that these amino acid residues have other (or additional) roles, not involving the −11A. The effects of the substitutions at −11A of the promoter and Y430 and W433 of σ⁷⁰ are cumulative.     

Different roles for basic and aromatic amino acids in conserved region 2 of Escherichia coli sigma(70) in the nucleation and maintenance of the single-stranded DNA bubble in open RNA polymerase-promoter complexes.

Amino acid residues in region 2 of final sigma(70) have been shown to play an important role in the strand separation step that is necessary for formation of the functional or open RNA polymerase-promoter complex. Here we present a comparison of the roles of basic and aromatic amino acids in the accomplishment of this process, using RNA polymerase bearing alanine substitutions for both types of amino acids in region 2. We determined the effects of the substitutions on the kinetics of open complex formation, as well as on the ability of the RNA polymerase to form complexes with single-stranded DNA, and with forked DNA duplexes carrying a single-stranded overhang consisting of bases in the -10 region. We concluded that two basic amino acids (Lys(414) and Lys(418)) are important for promoter binding and demonstrated distinct roles, at a subsequent step, for two aromatic amino acids (Tyr(430) and Trp(433)). It is likely that these four amino acids, which are close to each other in the structure of final sigma(70), together are involved in the nucleation of the strand separation process.     

Intermediates in the formation of the open complex by RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the sigma factor sigma 32 at the groE promoter

The interaction of E sigma 32 with the groE promoter at temperatures between 0 degrees C and 37 degrees C was studied using DNase I footprinting and dimethyl sulfate methylation. Three distinct complexes were observed. At 0 degrees C E sigma 32 fully protected sequences between -60 and -5 from DNase I digestion on the top (non-template) strand of the promoter. At 16 degrees C the majority of the E sigma 32 promoter complexes had a DNase I footprint almost identical with that seen at 37 degrees C, protecting the DNA from about -60 to +20; however, little DNA strand separation had occurred, and the changes in sensitivity of guanine residues to dimethyl sulfate methylation caused by E sigma 32 differed from those seen at 37 degrees C. DNA strand separation, and changes in the pattern of protections from and enhancements of methylation by dimethyl sulfate to those characteristic of the open complex, occurred at temperatures between 16 degrees C and 27 degrees C. It is plausible to assume that these temperature-dependent isomerizations are analogous to the time-dependent sequence of intermediates on the pathway to open complex formation at 37 degrees C. Therefore we propose that the formation of an open complex by E sigma 32 at the groE promoter involves three classes of steps: E sigma 32 initially binds to the promoter in a closed complex (RPC1) in which the enzyme interacts with a smaller region of the DNA than in the open complex. E sigma 32 then isomerizes to form a second closed complex (RPC2) in which the enzyme interacts with the same region of the DNA as in the open complex. Finally, a process of local DNA denaturation (strand opening) leads to formation of the open complex (RPO).     

Genetic and physiological studies of Bacillus subtilis sigma A mutants defective in promoter melting.

The Bacillus subtilis sigA gene encodes the primary sigma factor of RNA polymerase and is essential for cell growth. We have mutated conserved region 2.3 of the sigma A protein to substitute each of seven aromatic amino acids with alanine. Several of these aromatic amino acids are proposed to form a melting motif which facilitates the strand separation step of initiation. Holoenzymes containing mutant sigma factors recognize promoters, but some are defective for DNA melting in vitro. We have studied the ability of each mutant sigma factor to support cell growth by gene replacement and complementation. The two region 2.3 mutants least impaired in promoter melting in vitro (Y180A and Y184A) support cell growth in single copy, although the Y184A allele imparts a slow-growth phenotype at low temperatures. A strain expressing only the Y189A variant of the sigma A protein, known to be defective in DNA melting in vitro, grows very slowly and is altered in its pattern of protein synthesis. Only the wild-type and Y180A sigma A proteins efficiently complement a temperature-sensitive allele of sigA. Overexpression of three of the sigma A proteins defective for promoter melting in vitro (Y189A, W192A, and W193A) leads to a decrease in RNA synthesis and cell death. These results indicate that mutations which specifically impair DNA melting in vitro also impair sigma function in vivo and therefore support the hypothesis that sigma plays an essential role in both DNA melting and promoter recognition.     

Sigma38 (rpoS) RNA polymerase promoter engagement via -10 region nucleotides

Band shift assays using DNA probes that mimic closed and open complexes were used to explore the determinants of promoter recognition by sigma38 (rpoS) RNA polymerase. Duplex recognition was found to be much weaker than that observed in sigma70 promoter usage. However, binding to fork junction probes, which attempt to mimic melted DNA, was very strong. This binding occurs via the non-template strand with the identity of the two conserved junction nucleotides (-12T and -11A) being of paramount importance. A modified promoter consensus sequence identified these two nucleotides as among only four (underlined) that are highly conserved, and all four were in the -10 region (CTAcacT from -13 to -7). The remaining two nucleotides were shown to have different roles, -13C in preventing recognition by the heterologous sigma70 polymerase and -7T in directing enzyme isomerization. These -10 region nucleotides appear to have their primary function prior to full melting because probes that had a melted start site were relatively insensitive to substitution at these positions. These results suggest the sigma38 mechanism differs from the sigma70 mechanism, and this difference likely contributes to selective use of sigma38 under conditions that exist during stationery phase.     

Effect of DNA bases and backbone on sigma70 holoenzyme binding and isomerization using fork junction probes

Abasic substitutions in the non-template strand and promoter sequence changes were made to assess the roles of various promoter features in σ70 holoenzyme interactions with fork junction probes. Removal of –10 element non-template single strand bases, leaving the phosphodiester backbone intact, did not interfere with binding. In contrast these abasic probes were deficient in promoting holoenzyme isomerization to the heparin resistant conformation. Thus, it appears that the melted –10 region interaction has two components, an initial enzyme binding primarily to the phosphodiester backbone and a base dependent isomerization of the bound enzyme. In contrast various upstream elements cooperate primarily to stimulate binding. Features and positions most important for these effects are identified.     

Structural modeling of sequence specificity by an autoantibody against single-stranded DNA

11F8 is a sequence-specific pathogenic anti-single-stranded (ss)DNA autoantibody isolated from a lupus prone mouse. Site-directed mutagenesis of 11F8 has shown that six binding site residues (R31VH, W33VH, L97VH, R98VH, Y100VH, and Y32VL) contribute 80% of the free energy for complex formation. Mutagenesis results along with intermolecular distances obtained from fluorescence resonance energy transfer were implemented here as restraints to model docking between 11F8 and the sequence-specific ssDNA. The model of the complex suggests that aromatic stacking and two sets of bidentate hydrogen bonds between binding site arginine residues (R31VH and R96VH) and loop nucleotides provide the molecular basis for high affinity and specificity. In part, 11F8 utilizes the same ssDNA binding motif of Y32VL, H91VL, and an aromatic residue in the third complementarity-determining region to recognize thymine-rich sequences as do two anti-ssDNA autoantibodies crystallized in complex with thymine. R31SVH is a dominant somatic mutation found in the J558 germline sequence that is implicated in 11F8 sequence specificity. A model of the mutant R31S11F8.ssDNA complex suggests that different interface contacts occur when serine replaces arginine 31 at the binding site. The modeled contacts between the R31S11F8 mutant and thymine are closely related to those observed in other anti-ssDNA binding antibodies, while we find additional contacts between 11F8 and ssDNA that involve amino acids not utilized by the other antibodies. These data-driven 11F8.ssDNA models provide testable hypotheses concerning interactions that mediate sequence specificity in 11F8 and the effects of somatic mutation on ssDNA recognition.