The visual pigment and visual cycle of the lobster,Homarus

Summary The visual pigment of the American lobster,Homarus americanus, has been studied in individual isolated rhabdoms by microspectrophotometry. Lobster rhodopsin has _max at 515 nm and is converted by light to a stable metarhodopsin with _max at 490 nm. These figures are in good agreement with corresponding values obtained by Wald and Hubbard (1957) in digitonin extracts. Photoregeneration of rhodopsin to metarhodopsin is also observed. The absorbance spectrum of lobster metarhodopsin is invariant with pH in the range 5.4–9, indicating that even after isomerization of the chromophore fromcis totrans, the binding site of the chromophore remains sequestered from the solvent environment. Total axial density of the lobster rhabdom to unpolarized light is about 0.7.As described for several other Crustacea, aldehyde fixation renders the metarhodopsin susceptible to photobleaching, a process that is faster at alkaline than at neutral or acid pH. Small amounts of a photoproduct with _max at 370 nm are occasionally seen. A slower dark bleaching of lobster rhabdoms (_1/2–2 h) also occurs, frequently through intermediates with absorption similar to metarhodopsin.The molar extinction coefficient of metarhodopsin is about 1.2 times greater than that of rhodopsin, each measured at their respective _max. Isomerization of the chromophore fromcis totrans is accompanied by a change in the orientation of the absorption vector of about 3°. The absorption vector of metarhodopsin is either tilted more steeply into the membrane or is less tightly oriented with respect to the microvillar axes.When living lobsters are kept at room temperature, light adaptation does not result in an accumulation of metarhodopsin. At 4 °C, however, the same adapting lights cause a reduction of rhodopsin and an increase in metarhodopsin. There is thus a temperature-sensitive regeneration mechanism that supplements photoregeneration. Following 1 ms, 0.1 joule xenon flashes that convert about 70% of the rhodopsin to metarhodopsin in vivo, dark regeneration occurs in the living eye with half-times of about 25 and 55 min at 22 °C and 15 °C respectively.This work was supported by USPHS research grant EY 00222 to Yale University. S.N.B. was aided by NIH Postdoctoral Fellowship EY 52378.     

Visual pigment,dark adaptation and rhodopsin renewal in the eye of Pontoporeia affinis (Crustacea,Amphipoda)

The benthic amphipod Pontoporeia affinis lives in the Baltic sea and in northern European lakes in an environment where very little light is available for vision. The eyes, consisting of 40–50 ommatidia, are correspondingly modified. Microspectrophotometric recordings on isolated eyes show the presence of at least two kinds of screening pigments in the ommatidia with maxima at 540–580 nm and 460–500 nm. Difference spectra obtained from the rhabdoms after exposure to red and blue light, respectively, give evidence of a single rhodopsin with its maximum at 548 nm and a 500-nm metarhodopsin. In ERG recordings sensitivity in the dark-adapted state, after saturating exposures to blue and to red light, stabilizes at levels determined by the rhodopsin concentration. No change is observed during 10–14 h after the beginning of dark adaptation. However, using animals pre-exposed with a strong red light and then kept in darkness, it is found that after a delay of 20–40 h sensitivity of the dark-adapted eye begins to increase and finally, after 5–6 days reaches a level corresponding to 100% rhodopsin. Thus, a slow renewal of rhodopsin appears to occur in darkness, where a photoisomerization of metarhodopsin is excluded.Abbreviations ERG electroretinogram - IR infrared - MSP microspectrophotometry     

Visual Adaptation in the Retina of the Skate

The electroretinogram (ERG) and single-unit ganglion cell activity were recorded from the eyecup of the skate (Raja erinacea and R. oscellata), and the adaptation properties of both types of response compared with in situ rhodopsin measurements obtained by fundus reflectometry. Under all conditions tested, the b-wave of the ERG and the ganglion cell discharge showed identical adaptation properties. For example, after flash adaptation that bleached 80% of the rhodopsin, neither ganglion cell nor b-wave activity could be elicited for 10–15 min. Following this unresponsive period, thresholds fell rapidly; by 20 min after the flash, sensitivity was within 3 log units of the dark-adapted level. Further recovery of threshold was slow, requiring an additional 70–90 min to reach absolute threshold. Measurements of rhodopsin levels showed a close correlation with the slow recovery of threshold that occurred between 20 and 120 min of dark adaptation; there is a linear relation between rhodopsin concentration and log threshold. Other experiments dealt with the initial unresponsive period induced by light adaptation. The duration of this unresponsive period depended on the brightness of the adapting field; with bright backgrounds, suppression of retinal activity lasted 20–25 min, but sensitivity subsequently returned and thresholds fell to a steady-state value. At all background levels tested, increment thresholds were linearly related to background luminance.     

Responses of crayfish photoreceptor cells following intense light adaptation

Summary After intense orange adapting exposures that convert 80% of the rhodopsin in the eye to metarhodopsin, rhabdoms become covered with accessory pigment and appear to lose some microvillar order. Only after a delay of hours or even days is the metarhodopsin replaced by rhodopsin (Cronin and Goldsmith 1984). After 24 h of dark adaptation, when there has been little recovery of visual pigment, the photoreceptor cells have normal resting potentials and input resistances, and the reversal potential of the light response is 10–15 mV (inside positive), unchanged from controls. The log V vs log I curve is shifted about 0.6 log units to the right on the energy axis, quantitatively consistent with the decrease in the probability of quantum catch expected from the lowered concentration of rhodopsin in the rhabdoms. Furthermore, at 24 h the photoreceptors exhibit a broader spectral sensitivity than controls, which is also expected from accumulations of metarhodopsin in the rhabdoms. In three other respects, however, the transduction process appears to be light adapted: (i) The voltage responses are more phasic than those of control photoreceptors. (ii) The relatively larger effect (compared to controls) of low extracellular Ca⁺⁺ (1 mmol/1 EGTA) in potentiating the photoresponses suggests that the photoreceptors may have elevated levels of free cytoplasmic Ca⁺⁺. (iii) The saturating depolarization is only about 30% as large as the maximal receptor potentials of contralateral, dark controls, and by that measure the log V-log I curve is shifted downward by 0.54 log units. The gain (change in conductance per absorbed photon) therefore appears to have been diminished.     

Photopigment and receptor properties in Drosophila compound eye and ocellar receptors

A review of the spectral sensitivity and the rhodopsin and metarhodopsin characteristics in three compound eye receptor types (R1–6, R7, and R8) and ocellar receptors is presented (Fig. 1). Photopigment properties were determined from measures of conversion efficiency. The photopigments of R1–6 were studied using in vivo microspectrophotometry in the deep pseudopupil of white-eyed flies. These studies yielded a refined estimate of the R1–6 metarhodopsin spectrum (Fig. 2). The quantum efficiency relative to the spectral sensitivity estimate of the rhodopsin spectrum was factored out. The quantum efficiency of rhodopsin is about 1.75 times that of metarhodopsin. The peak absorbance of metarhodopsin was estimated to be about 2.6 times that of rhodopsin. The mechanism of the two-peaked R1–6 spectral sensitivity and metarhodopsin spectrum is discussed in terms of evidence that there is only one rhodopsin in R1–6 and that vitamin A deprivation preferentially lowers ultraviolet sensitivity. The prolonged depolarizing afterpotential is reviewed from the standpoint of the internal transmitter hypothesis of visual excitation. A careful comparison of the intensity-responsivity for photopigment conversion and its adaptional consequences is made (Fig. 3).     

Neural and Photochemical Mechanisms of Visual Adaptation in the Rat

The effects of light adaptation on the increment threshold, rhodopsin content, and dark adaptation have been studied in the rat eye over a wide range of intensities. The electroretinogram threshold was used as a measure of eye sensitivity. With adapting intensities greater than 1.5 log units above the absolute ERG threshold, the increment threshold rises linearly with increasing adapting intensity. With 5 minutes of light adaptation, the rhodopsin content of the eye is not measurably reduced until the adapting intensity is greater than 5 log units above the ERG threshold. Dark adaptation is rapid (i.e., completed in 5 to 10 minutes) until the eye is adapted to lights strong enough to bleach a measurable fraction of the rhodopsin. After brighter light adaptations, dark adaptation consists of two parts, an initial rapid phase followed by a slow component. The extent of slow adaptation depends on the fraction of rhodopsin bleached. If all the rhodopsin in the eye is bleached, the slow fall of threshold extends over 5 log units and takes 2 to 3 hours to complete. The fall of ERG threshold during the slow phase of adaptation occurs in parallel with the regeneration of rhodopsin. The slow component of dark adaptation is related to the bleaching and resynthesis of rhodopsin; the fast component of adaptation is considered to be neural adaptation.     

Dark adaptation processes in the amphibian rod

Rod dark adaptation in the amphibian retina appears to be due to three processes: 1. background adaptation, occurring immediately after the extinction of an adapting or bleaching light, 2. intermediate adaptation, that frequently lasts 30 min or more and 3. opsin adaptation, which in the isolated retina where regeneration of rhodopsin is insignificant, is observed as a permanent loss of sensitivity after the completion of intermediate adaptation. Intermediate adaptation is characterized by a linear relation between log threshold and the amount of retinal present, a similar relation is obtained between log threshold and the amount of rhodopsin bleached in opsin adaptation.These adaptation processes are discussed in terms of a model of the rod outer segment.Presented at the EMBO-Workshop on Transduction Mechanism of Photoreceptors, Jülich, Germany, October 4–8, 1976     

Spectral absorption and sensitivity measurements in single ommatidia of the green crab,Carcinus

Summary Rhabdoms of the green crabCarcinus maenas were examined by microspectrophotometry and found to contain a visual pigment with _max at 502–506 nm. Upon irradiation, a stable metarhodopsin formed with unchanged _max and molar extinction coefficient. In the presence of 5% glutaraldehyde the rhabdoms were photobleached. Partial bleaching experiments indicate that in the rhabdoms studied, only one visual pigment was present, with an absorption spectrum appropriate for a hypothetical rhodopsin from Dartnall's (1953) nomogram.Retinular (photoreceptor) cells were studied with microelectrodes. They had negative resting potentials of 30–65 mV and responded to light with depolarizing receptor potentials. All cells had maximum sensitivity at ~493 nm, as did the ERG (electroretinogram). Selective adaptation failed to alter the spectral sensitivity functions of single cells or the ERG. If these spectral sensitivity data are pooled with Wald's (1968), the average sensitivity of the dark-adapted eye is accounted for adequately by the pigment of the rhabdom.The results of this work do not support the hypothesis of Horridge (1967) that each ommatidium ofCarcinus has two color receptors.This work was supported by U.S. P.H.S. grant EY 00222.     

Analysis of the rhodopsin cycle in limulus ventral photoreceptors using the early receptor potential

The early receptor potential (ERP) was recorded intracellularly from Limulus ventral photoreceptors. The ERP in cells dissected under red light was altered by exhaustive illumination. No recovery to the original wafeform was observed, even after 1 h in the dark. The ERP waveform could be further altered by chromatic adaptation or by changes in pH. The results indicate that at pH 7.8 there are two interconvertible pigment states with only slightly different lambdamax, whereas at pH 9.6 there are two interconvertible states with very different lambdamax. Under all conditions studied the ERPs were almost identical with those previously obtained in squid retinas. This strongly suggests that light converts Limulus rhodopsin to a stable photoequilibrium mixture of rhodopsin to a stable photoequilibrium mixture of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin and that, as in squid, the lambdamax of metarhodopsin depends on pH. This conversion at pH 7.8 is associated with a small (0.7 log unit) decrease in the maximum sensitivity of the late receptor potential. Thus the component of adaptation linked to changes in rhodopsin concentration is unimportant in comparison to the "neural" component.     

The dorsal eye of the dragonfly Sympetrum: specializations for prey detection against the blue sky

Dragonflies of the genus Sympetrum have compound eyes conspicuously divided into dorsal and ventral regions. Using anatomical, optical, electrophysiological, in-vivo photochemical and microspectrophotometrical methods, we have investigated the design and physiology of the dorsal part which is characterized by a pale yellow-orange screening pigment and extremely large facets. The upper part of the yellow dorsal region is a pronounced fovea with interommatidial angles approaching 0.3°, contrasting to the much larger values of 1.5°–2° in the rest of the eye. The dorsal eye part is exclusively sensitive to short wavelengths (below 520 nm). It contains predominantly blue-receptors with a sensitivity maximum at 420 nm, and a smaller amount of UV-receptors. The metarhodopsin of the blue-receptors absorbs maximally at 535 nm. The yellow screening pigment transmits longwavelength light (cut-on 580 nm), which increases the conversion rate from metarhodopsin to rhodopsin (see Fig. 11a). We demonstrate that because of the yellow pigment screen nearly all of the photopigment is in the rhodopsin state under natural conditions, thus maximizing sensitivity. Theoretical considerations show that the extremely long rhabdoms (1.1 mm) in the dorsal fovea are motivated for absorption reasons alone. A surprising consequence of the long rhabdoms is that the sensitivity gain, caused by pumping photopigment into the rhodopsin state, is small. To explain this puzzling fact we present arguments for a mechanism producing a gradient of rhodopsin concentration along the rhabdom, which would minimize saturation of transduction units, and hence improve the signal-to-noise ratio at high intensities. The latter is of special importance for the short integration time and high contrast sensitivity these animals need for spotting small prey at long distances.Abbreviations ERG electroretinogram - R rhodopsin - M metarhodopsin     

Afterpotentials in dronefly retinula cells

Summary The wavelength dependence of the afterpotentials following a bright illumination was studied in single photoreceptor cells of the droneflyEristalis. Cells with only a spectral sensitivity peak in the blue were selected. As previously demonstrated, these cells contain a rhodopsin absorbing maximally at about 450–460 nm, which upon photoconversion transforms into a metarhodopsin absorbing maximally at about 550 nm (Tsukahara and Horridge, 1977).With the visual pigment initially all in the rhodopsin form, a high rate of visual pigment conversion results in an afterhyperpolarization (AHP) when the fraction of metarhodopsin remains negligible after illumination as occurs at longer wavelengths if the intensity is high. Intensive illumination at short wavelengths is followed by a prolonged depolarizing afterpotential (PDA). The magnitude of the PDA peaks at low intensities at about 450–460 nm, corresponding to the peak of the cell's spectral sensitivity (i.e. the rhodopsin peak). With increasing intensity of illumination, however, the peak shifts progressively towards 430 nm, which corresponds to the photoequilibrium with maximum metarhodopsin that can be established by monochromatic light. From this result, it is inferred that the PDA is related to the induced fall in the rhodopsin fraction. The PDA can be abolished, or knocked down, by a long-wavelength flash which reconverts remaining metarhodopsin into rhodopsin. Therefore the decline of the PDA is restrained by the existing amount of metarhodopsin. Possible theories of afterpotentials are discussed.     

Reversible phosphorylation of opsin induced by irradiation of blowfly retinae

Summary Light-induced phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the visual pigment protein, opsin, was investigated in isolated retinae of the blowfly making use of the fact that photon capture by rhodopsin leads to the formation of a thermostable metarhodopsin. Retinae were exposed, in the presence of exogenous³²P-orthophosphate, to an intense blue light which initiated the phosphorylation of opsin (half-time about 5 min at 25 °C). Subsequent exposure of the retina to red light converted all the metarhodopsin present into rhodopsin and triggered a relatively rapid dephosphorylation of rhodopsin (half-time less than 20 s). It is proposed that the phosphorylated forms of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin represent inactive states of the pigment, i.e. phosphorylated metarhodopsin does not initiate reactions leading to the excitation of the photoreceptor cell and phosphorylated rhodopsin cannot be converted into physiologically active metarhodopsin without first being dephosphorylated.Abbreviations R1–6 peripheral retinula cells of the blowfly ommatidium - PDA prolonged depolarizing afterpotential - R rhodopsin - M metarhodopsin - R-P _n phosphorylated rhodopsin - M-P _n phosphorylated metarhodopsin - SDS-PAGE sodium dodecylsulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis     

Renewal of visual pigment in photoreceptors of the blowfly

Summary Spectrophotometric measurements of photoreceptors 1–6 in the blowfly demonstrate that rhodopsin undergoes a continuous renewal. This involves, in the dark, the slow degradation of rhodopsin whereas metarhodopsin is degraded at a much faster rate. The effect of light is to reduce the rate at which metarhodopsin is degraded, i.e. the rate is inversely related to the intensity of the light. Rhodopsin synthesis is dependent on the presence of 11-cis retinal which is formed via a photoreaction from all-trans retinal resulting from the breakdown of rhodopsin and/or metarhodopsin: the biosynthesis of rhodopsin is therefore a light dependent process. Light of the blue/violet spectral range was found to mediate the isomerization of all-trans retinal into the 11-cis form. It is proposed that this stereospecificity is the result of all-trans retinal being bound to a protein. On the basis of the results a visual pigment cycle is proposed.     

Sensitivity and photopigments of R1-6, a two-peaked photoreceptor,inDrosophila, Calliphora andMusca

Summary Low vitamin A rearing decreases sensitivity and eliminates the ultraviolet but not the blue sensitivity maximum in R1-6 inDrosophila, Calliphora andMusca (Figs. 2–4). Spectral adaptation functions for control and vitamin A deprived flies yielded derived stable metarhodopsin absorption spectra from spectral sensitivity. Metarhodopsin has a long wavelength maximum and also has an ultraviolet maximum especially in the normal vitamin A condition (Figs. 2–4). M-potentials (fast early-receptor-like potentials) were obtained (Fig. 1) from all three genera in normal vitamin A rearing and were used for spectral adaptation studies (Figs. 2–3); the latter data are approximate inverses of sensitivity based spectral adaptation data. Thus, sensitivity must reflect proportion of rhodopsin, with metarhodopsin being inert in receptor potential generation.Vitamin A effects on spectral functions were further investigated inDrosophila. Ultraviolet (370 nm) and visible (470 nm) sensitivities varied approximately linearly with dietary vitamin A dose (Fig. 5); 370 nm sensitivity decreased more than 470 nm sensitivity at lower doses. Increasing adaptation intensities of 370 and 470 nm caused parallel decreases in spectral sensitivity assayed at 370 and 470 nm in normal vitamin A flies (Fig. 6); the adapting intensities were sufficient to convert photopigment. These and previous results suggest that the two R1-6 spectral peaks are ultimately mediated by one rhodopsin. R1-6 rhabdomeres were structurally similar in high and low vitamin A flies but emitted a long wavelength fluorescence to ultraviolet excitation in high vitamin A flies only (Fig. 7). These results suggest some form of energy transfer; i.e., a carotenoid may capture ultraviolet quanta and transfer energy to rhodopsin via inductive resonance. Spectral adaptation data are consistent with a calculated high rhabdomeric optical density of ECL=0.26 (i.e., 45% of incident light is absorbed) derived from presently available data onDrosophila. Calculations show electro-retinographic sensitivity to be extremely high, perhaps measurable at less than one absorbed quantum per rhabdomere.Supported by NSF grants BMS-74-12817 and BNS-76-11921. We thank M. Chapin, K. Hu, D. Lakin, G. Pransky, D. Sawyer and W. Zitzmann for technical assistance. We are indebted to numerous colleagues especially W. Harris, for comments and suggestions.Chalky Calliphora were obtained from the laboratories of Dr. G. McCann at Caltech and Dr. L. Bishop at the University of Southern California.W-II Musca were from Dr. D. Wagoner at the U.S.D.A. in Fargo, North Dakota.     

Spectral responses of sustaining fibers in the optic tracts of crayfish (Procambarus)

Summary Spectral response curves were recorded for 60–70 individual sustaining fibers in the optic nerve of the crayfish Procambarus. These cells belong to at least 8 of the 14 classes of sustaining fibers described by Wiersma and Yamaguchi (1966) on the basis of receptive fields. About 90 percent of the cells receive predominant input from yellow-green receptors and are maximally sensitive at 560 to 570 nm; a much smaller number receive principal input from blue receptors and are maximally sensitive near 460 nm.The wavelength sensitivity of optic fibers receiving their major input from yellow-green receptors depends on the state of dark adaptation of the animal and the intensity of illumination. Early in dark adaptation and at high intensities of stimulation the spectral response curve is distorted by light which has been filtered through the sleeves of red-brown shielding pigment. During dark adaptation a shift in maximum spectral response to shorter wavelengths parallels the retraction of the migratory pigment to the dark position and the development of retinal glow. The effects are reversed by injecting into a dark-adapted animal an extract of eyestalks containing the hormone controlling pigment migration: the pigment sleeves lengthen, retinal glow disappears, and shoulders or peaks of sensitivity appear in the red region of the spectrum.This work was supported by USPHS research grant EY 00222 to Yale University. A. E. R. W. was aided by a Fulbright-Hays travel grant. We are grateful to Prof. C. A. G. Wiersma and Dr. R. M. Glantz for a helpful demonstration of the recording technique.     

Rhodopsin photoproducts and rod sensitivity in the skate retina

The late photoproducts that result from the isomerization of rhodopsin have been identified in the isolated all-rod retina of the skate by means of rapid spectrophotometry. The sequence in which these intermediates form and decay could be described by a scheme that incorporates two pathways for the degradation of metarhodopsin II (MII) to retinol: one via metarhodopsin III (MIII) and the other (which bypasses MIII) through retinal. Computer simulation of the model yielded rate constants and spectral absorbance coefficients for the late photoproducts which fit experimental data obtained at temperatures ranging from 7 degrees C to 27 degrees C. Comparing the kinetics of the thermal reactions with the changes in rod threshold that occur during dark adaptation indicated that the decay of MII and the fall in receptor thresholds exhibit similarities with regard to their temperature dependence. However, the addition of 2 mM hydroxylamine to a perfusate bathing the retina greatly accelerated the photochemical reactions, but had no significant effect on the rate of recovery of rod sensitivity. It appears, therefore, that the late bleaching intermediates do not control the sensitivities of skate rods during dark adaptation.     

Distribution of rhodopsin and retinochrome in the squid retina

The cephalopod retina contains two kinds of photopigments, rhodopsin and retinochrome. For many years retinochrome has been thought to be localized in the inner segments of the visual cells, whereas rhodopsin is in the outer segments. However, it is now clear that retinochrome can be extracted also from fragments of outer segments. In the dark-adapted retina of Loligo pealei retinochrome is distributed half-and-half in the inner and outer segments. Todarodes pacificus contains much more retinochrome than Loligo, and it is more abundant in the outer than in the inner segments. The outer segments of Loligo contain retinochrome and metarhodopsin in addition to rhodopsin, whether squids are kept in the dark or in the light. But there is extremely little metarhodopsin (about 3% of rhodopsin) even in light-adapted eyes. The inner segments contain only retinochrome, and much less in the light than in the dark. On the other hand, retinochrome in the outer segments increases markedly during light adaptation. These facts suggest the possibility that some retinochrome moves forward from the inner to the outer segments during light adaptation and there reacts with metarhodopsin to promote regeneration of rhodopsin.     

Differential wavelength sensitivity in the receptive fields of sustaining fibers in the optic tract of the crayfishProcambarus

Summary Spike discharges were measured at 473 nm and at 573 nm in 40–50 individual sustaining fibers (slowly-adapting units signaling intensity levels over large receptive fields). The units belonged to five of the 14 classes of sustaining fibers recognized by Wiersma and Yamaguchi (1966) on the basis of the positions of their receptive fields. The test wavelengths were selected because they lie near the peaks of sensitivity of the two spectral types of receptor known to be present in the ommatida. Relative sensitivity was measured at 5 ° intervals as the test lights were moved around the eye on various arcs, and the receptive fields were described in terms of contours of equal sensitivity for each wavelength.No large differences in relative spectral sensitivity were observed as a function of position in the receptive field, but there was a consistent tendency for sensitivity to blue light to be relatively greater in the dorsal region of the eye. The difference was modest, generally being 0.5 log units or less. This effect could be caused either by regional variation in the population density of the blue and yellow-green receptors, or by weighting of inputs in the optic neuropile.This work was supported by USPHS research grant EY00222 to Yale University. A.E.R.W. was aided by a Fulbright-Hays travel grant.     

The rhodopsin system of the squid

Squid rhodopsin (λ_max 493 mµ)—like vertebrate rhodopsins—contains a retinene chromophore linked to a protein, opsin. Light transforms rhodopsin to lumi- and metarhodopsin. However, whereas vertebrate metarhodopsin at physiological temperatures decomposes into retinene and opsin, squid metarhodopsin is stable. Light also converts squid metarhodopsin to rhodopsin. Rhodopsin is therefore regenerated from metarhodopsin in the light. Irradiation of rhodopsin or metarhodopsin produces a steady state by promoting the reactions, See PDF for Equation Squid rhodopsin contains neo-b (11-cis) retinene; metarhodopsin all-trans retinene. The interconversion of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin involves only the stereoisomerization of their chromophores. Squid metarhodopsin is a pH indicator, red (λ_max 500 mµ) near neutrality, yellow (λ_max 380 mµ) in alkaline solution. The two forms—acid and alkaline metarhodopsin—are interconverted according to the equation, Alkaline metarhodopsin + H⁺ acid metarhodopsin, with pK 7.7. In both forms, retinene is attached to opsin at the same site as in rhodopsin. However, metarhodopsin decomposes more readily than rhodopsin into retinene and opsin. The opsins apparently fit the shape of the neo-b chromophore. When light isomerizes the chromophore to the all-trans configuration, squid opsin accepts the all-trans chromophore, while vertebrate opsins do not and hence release all-trans retinene. Light triggers vision by affecting directly the shape of the retinene chromophore. This changes its relationship with opsin, so initiating a train of chemical reactions.     

Dark regeneration of rhodopsin in crayfish photoreceptors

The eyes of crayfish were exposed to lights of known spectral composition, and the course of regeneration was followed in the dark by measuring the content of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin in single rhabdoms isolated at various times after the adaptation, using an assay that is based on the fluorescence of metarhodopsin. Complete recovery requires several days in the dark after intense adaptation to orange light, but requires less than 2 d after blue light exposure. Following an orange light exposure with blue produces recovery kinetics characteristic of the blue light exposure alone. This quickening of recovery occurs whether the receptors are exposed to blue light either immediately or many hours after the original exposure to orange. Conversely, following blue light adaptation with orange leads to slow recovery, which is characteristic of orange alone. Recovery from long-wavelength adaptation is slower principally because many rhabdoms seem to delay the onset of regeneration. We suggest that the regeneration system is itself photosensitive, and after orange light adaptation the supply of active chromophore (presumably 11-cis retinal) limits the rate of recovery. Once started, recovery proceeds slowly and continuously, and the total pigment concentration (rhodopsin plus metarhodopsin) in the rhabdomeric membrane remains approximately constant. Within hours after intense adapting exposures, the rhabdoms become altered in appearance, the surfaces become coated with accessory pigment, and the bands of microvilli are less distinct. These changes persist until recovery of rhodopsin proceeds, which suggests that visual pigment regeneration results from addition of newly synthesized rhodopsin associated with membrane turn-over.